Rationales for Animal Species Considered for Designation As Species of Conservation Concern Inyo National Forest

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rationales for Animal Species Considered for Designation As Species of Conservation Concern Inyo National Forest Rationales for Animal Species Considered for Designation as Species of Conservation Concern Inyo National Forest Prepared by: Wildlife Biologists and Natural Resources Specialist Regional Office, Inyo National Forest, and Washington Office Enterprise Program for: Inyo National Forest August 2018 1 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: [email protected]. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender. Animal Rationales Species of Conservation Concern Contents Rationales for Animal Species Considered for Species of Conservation Concern Inyo National Forest ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 Species of Conservation Concern Compared to Forest Service Sensitive Species ................. 1 Procedure for Evaluation of Animal Species of Conservation Concern ................................. 2 Inyo National Forest Species of Conservation Concern .......................................................... 3 References ............................................................................................................................... 3 Chapter 1 – Rationale for Animal Species Determined to be Species of Conservation Concern 4 Mammals ................................................................................................................................. 4 Fisher - Pekania pennanti ................................................................................................... 9 Nelson desert bighorn sheep - Ovis Canadensis nelsoni .................................................... 4 Sierra marten - Martes caurina sierrae .............................................................................. 9 Birds ...................................................................................................................................... 26 Bald eagle - Haliaeetus leucocephalus ............................................................................. 26 Bi-State sage grouse - Centrocercus urophasianus .......................................................... 32 California spotted owl - Strix occidentalis occidentalis ................................................... 38 Great Gray Owl - Strix nebulosa ...................................................................................... 44 Mount Pinos Sooty Grouse - Dendragapus fuliginosus howardi ..................................... 51 Willow Flycatcher - Empidonax traillii ........................................................................... 55 Amphibians ........................................................................................................................... 61 Black toad - Bufo exsul ..................................................................................................... 61 Inyo Mountains slender salamander - Batrachoseps campi ............................................. 67 Kern Plateau salamander - Batrachoseps robustus .......................................................... 71 Fish ........................................................................................................................................ 75 California golden trout - Oncorhynchus mykiss aquabonita ............................................ 75 Terrestrial Invertebrates ......................................................................................................... 80 Sierra sulphur - Colias behrii ........................................................................................... 80 Square dotted blue - Euphilotes battoides mazourka ....................................................... 87 Mono Lake checkerspot - Euphydryas editha monoensis ................................................ 89 Boisduval's blue - Plebejus icarioides inyo ...................................................................... 93 San Emigdio blue - Plebulina emigdionis ........................................................................ 95 Apache fritillary - Speyeria nokomis apacheana ............................................................. 98 A cave obligate pseudoscorpion - Tuberochernes aalbui .............................................. 102 Aqautic Insects .................................................................................................................... 104 Owens Valley springsnail - Pygulopsis owensensis ....................................................... 104 Western pearlshell - Margaritifera falcata ..................................................................... 108 Wong’s springsnail - Pyrgulopsis wongi ........................................................................ 113 Chapter 2 – Rationale for Animal Species Determined Not to be Species of Conservation Concern ................................................................................................................................... 119 Mammals ............................................................................................................................. 119 American badger - Taxidea taxus ................................................................................... 119 American pika - Ochotona princeps, Ochotona princeps schisticeps ............................ 119 Fringed myotis, Myotis thysanodes ................................................................................ 122 Little brown myotis - Myotis lucifugus .......................................................................... 126 Lodgepole chipmunk - Neotamias speciosus speciosus ................................................. 127 Long-eared myotis - Myotis evotis ................................................................................. 128 Long-legged myotis - Myotis volans .............................................................................. 129 Owens Valley vole - Microtus californicus vallicola ..................................................... 129 i Animal Rationales Species of Conservation Concern Pallid bat - Antrozous pallidus ....................................................................................... 130 Pronghorn - Antilocapra americana ............................................................................... 132 Pygmy rabbit - Brachylagus idahoensis ......................................................................... 133 Sierra Nevada mountain beaver - Aplodontia rufa californica ...................................... 135 Sierra Nevada Snowshoe Hare - Lepus americanus tahoensis ....................................... 137 Silver-haired bat - Lasionycteris noctivagans ................................................................ 140 Spotted bat - Euderma maculatum ................................................................................. 142 Townsend's big-eared bat - Corynorhinus townsendii ................................................... 144 Western white-tailed jack rabbit - Lepus townsendii townsendii ................................... 154 Yuma myotis - Myotis yumanensis................................................................................. 155 Birds .................................................................................................................................... 156 American peregrine falcon - Falco peregrinus anatum ................................................. 156 American white pelican - Pelecanus erythrorhynchos ................................................... 160 Bank swallow - Riparia riparia ..................................................................................... 162 Barrow's goldeneye - Bucephala islandica ...................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Management Plan for the Yellow Rail in Canada
    Species at Risk Actl Management Plan Series Management Plan for the Yellow Rail (Coturnicops noveboracensis) in Canada Yellow Rail 2013 Recommended citation: Environment Canada. 2013. Management Plan for the Yellow Rail (Coturnicops noveboracensis) in Canada. Species at Risk Act Management Plan Series. Environment Canada, Ottawa. iii + 24 pp. For copies of the management plan, or for additional information on species at risk, including COSEWIC Status Reports, residence descriptions, action plans, and other related recovery documents, please visit the Species at Risk (SAR) Public Registry (www.sararegistry.gc.ca). Cover photo: ©Jacques Brisson Également disponible en français sous le titre « Plan de gestion du Râle jaune (Coturnicops noveboracensis) au Canada » © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of the Environment, 2013. All rights reserved. ISBN 978-1-100-21199-2 Catalogue no. En3-5/38-2013E-PDF Content (excluding the illustrations) may be used without permission, with appropriate credit to the source. Management Plan for the Yellow Rail 2013 PREFACE The federal, provincial, and territorial government signatories under the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk (1996) agreed to establish complementary legislation and programs that provide for effective protection of species at risk throughout Canada. Under the Species at Risk Act (S.C. 2002, c.29) (SARA), the federal competent ministers are responsible for the preparation of management plans for listed Special Concern species and are required to report on progress within five years. The Minister of the Environment and the Minister responsible for the Parks Canada Agency are the competent ministers for the management of the Yellow Rail and have prepared this plan, as per section 65 of SARA.
    [Show full text]
  • The Indo-Pacific Amalda (Neogastropoda, Olivoidea, Ancillariidae) Revisited with Molecular Data, with Special Emphasis on New Caledonia
    European Journal of Taxonomy 706: 1–59 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2020.706 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2020 · Kantor Yu.I. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C4C4D130-1EA7-48AA-A664-391DBC59C484 The Indo-Pacific Amalda (Neogastropoda, Olivoidea, Ancillariidae) revisited with molecular data, with special emphasis on New Caledonia Yuri I. KANTOR 1,*, Magalie CASTELIN 2, Alexander FEDOSOV 3 & Philippe BOUCHET 4 1,3 A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninski Prospect 33, 119071 Moscow. 2,4 Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité, ISYEB, UMR7205 (CNRS, EPHE, MNHN, UPMC), Muséum national d’histoire naturelle, Sorbonne Universités, 43 Rue Cuvier, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France. * Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 Email: [email protected] 3 Email: [email protected] 4 Email: [email protected] 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48F89A50-4CAC-4143-9D8B-73BA82735EC9 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:9464EC90-738D-4795-AAD2-9C6D0FA2F29D 3 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:40BCE11C-D138-4525-A7BB-97F594041BCE 4 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:FC9098A4-8374-4A9A-AD34-475E3AAF963A Abstract. In the ancillariid genus Amalda, the shell is character rich and 96 described species are currently treated as valid. Based on shell morphology, several subspecies have been recognized within Amalda hilgendorfi, with a combined range extending at depths of 150–750 m from Japan to the South-West Pacific. A molecular analysis of 78 specimens from throughout this range shows both a weak geographical structuring and evidence of gene flow at the regional scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Assessment for Boreal Toad (Bufo Boreas Boreas)
    SPECIES ASSESSMENT FOR BOREAL TOAD (BUFO BOREAS BOREAS ) IN WYOMING prepared by 1 2 MATT MCGEE AND DOUG KEINATH 1 Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Ave, Dept. 3381, Laramie, Wyoming 82071; 307-766-3023 2 Zoology Program Manager, Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Ave, Dept. 3381, Laramie, Wyoming 82071; 307-766-3013; [email protected] drawing by Summers Scholl prepared for United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Wyoming State Office Cheyenne, Wyoming March 2004 McGee and Keinath – Bufo boreas boreas March 2004 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 3 NATURAL HISTORY ........................................................................................................................... 4 Morphological Description ...................................................................................................... 4 Taxonomy and Distribution ..................................................................................................... 5 Habitat Requirements............................................................................................................. 8 General ............................................................................................................................................8 Spring-Summer ...............................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive Multilocus Assessment of Sparrow (Aves: Passerellidae) Relationships ⇑ John Klicka A, , F
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 77 (2014) 177–182 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Short Communication A comprehensive multilocus assessment of sparrow (Aves: Passerellidae) relationships ⇑ John Klicka a, , F. Keith Barker b,c, Kevin J. Burns d, Scott M. Lanyon b, Irby J. Lovette e, Jaime A. Chaves f,g, Robert W. Bryson Jr. a a Department of Biology and Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture, University of Washington, Box 353010, Seattle, WA 98195-3010, USA b Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, 100 Ecology Building, 1987 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA c Bell Museum of Natural History, University of Minnesota, 100 Ecology Building, 1987 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA d Department of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA e Fuller Evolutionary Biology Program, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Cornell University, 159 Sapsucker Woods Road, Ithaca, NY 14950, USA f Department of Biology, University of Miami, 1301 Memorial Drive, Coral Gables, FL 33146, USA g Universidad San Francisco de Quito, USFQ, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, y Extensión Galápagos, Campus Cumbayá, Casilla Postal 17-1200-841, Quito, Ecuador article info abstract Article history: The New World sparrows (Emberizidae) are among the best known of songbird groups and have long- Received 6 November 2013 been recognized as one of the prominent components of the New World nine-primaried oscine assem- Revised 16 April 2014 blage. Despite receiving much attention from taxonomists over the years, and only recently using molec- Accepted 21 April 2014 ular methods, was a ‘‘core’’ sparrow clade established allowing the reconstruction of a phylogenetic Available online 30 April 2014 hypothesis that includes the full sampling of sparrow species diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Habitat Plan
    WILDLIFE HABITAT PLAN City of Novi, Michigan A QUALITY OF LIFE FOR THE 21ST CENTURY WILDLIFE HABITAT PLAN City of Novi, Michigan A QUALIlY OF LIFE FOR THE 21ST CENTURY JUNE 1993 Prepared By: Wildlife Management Services Brandon M. Rogers and Associates, P.C. JCK & Associates, Inc. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS City Council Matthew C. Ouinn, Mayor Hugh C. Crawford, Mayor ProTem Nancy C. Cassis Carol A. Mason Tim Pope Robert D. Schmid Joseph G. Toth Planning Commission Kathleen S. McLallen, * Chairman John P. Balagna, Vice Chairman lodia Richards, Secretary Richard J. Clark Glen Bonaventura Laura J. lorenzo* Robert Mitzel* Timothy Gilberg Robert Taub City Manager Edward F. Kriewall Director of Planning and Community Development James R. Wahl Planning Consultant Team Wildlife Management Services - 640 Starkweather Plymouth, MI. 48170 Kevin Clark, Urban Wildlife Specialist Adrienne Kral, Wildlife Biologist Ashley long, Field Research Assistant Brandon M. Rogers and Associates, P.C. - 20490 Harper Ave. Harper Woods, MI. 48225 Unda C. lemke, RlA, ASLA JCK & Associates, Inc. - 45650 Grand River Ave. Novi, MI. 48374 Susan Tepatti, Water Resources Specialist * Participated with the Planning Consultant Team in developing the study. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii PREFACE vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY viii FRAGMENTATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES " ., , 1 Consequences ............................................ .. 1 Effects Of Forest Fragmentation 2 Edges 2 Reduction of habitat 2 SPECIES SAMPLING TECHNIQUES ................................ .. 3 Methodology 3 Survey Targets ............................................ ., 6 Ranking System ., , 7 Core Reserves . .. 7 Wildlife Movement Corridor .............................. .. 9 FIELD SURVEY RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS , 9 Analysis Results ................................ .. 9 Core Reserves . .. 9 Findings and Recommendations , 9 WALLED LAKE CORE RESERVE - DETAILED STUDy.... .. .... .. .... .. 19 Results and Recommendations ............................... .. 21 GUIDELINES TO ECOLOGICAL LANDSCAPE PLANNING AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Locomotion on the Brain Evolution of Squirrels and Close Relatives ✉ Ornella C
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-01887-8 OPEN The impact of locomotion on the brain evolution of squirrels and close relatives ✉ Ornella C. Bertrand 1 , Hans P. Püschel 1, Julia A. Schwab 1, Mary T. Silcox 2 & Stephen L. Brusatte1 How do brain size and proportions relate to ecology and evolutionary history? Here, we use virtual endocasts from 38 extinct and extant rodent species spanning 50+ million years of evolution to assess the impact of locomotion, body mass, and phylogeny on the size of the brain, olfactory bulbs, petrosal lobules, and neocortex. We find that body mass and phylogeny are highly correlated with relative brain and brain component size, and that locomotion strongly influences brain, petrosal lobule, and neocortical sizes. Notably, species living in 1234567890():,; trees have greater relative overall brain, petrosal lobule, and neocortical sizes compared to other locomotor categories, especially fossorial taxa. Across millions of years of Eocene- Recent environmental change, arboreality played a major role in the early evolution of squirrels and closely related aplodontiids, promoting the expansion of the neocortex and petrosal lobules. Fossoriality in aplodontiids had an opposing effect by reducing the need for large brains. 1 School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Grant Institute, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK. 2 Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto Scarborough, ✉ Toronto, ON, Canada. email: [email protected] COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY | (2021) 4:460 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-01887-8 | www.nature.com/commsbio 1 ARTICLE COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY | https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-01887-8 hat ecological and evolutionary factors affect brain size striking differences between living sciurids and aplodontiids raise in mammals? Studies have assessed the impact of the question of how this modern rodent assemblage emerged.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Butterfly Observations in the Karaganda Oblast of Kazakstan (Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera) by Bent Kjeldgaard Larsen Received 3.111.2003
    ©Ges. zur Förderung d. Erforschung von Insektenwanderungen e.V. München, download unter www.zobodat.at Atalanta (August 2003) 34(1/2): 153-165, colour plates Xl-XIVa, Wurzburg, ISSN 0171-0079 Some butterfly observations in the Karaganda Oblast of Kazakstan (Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera) by Bent Kjeldgaard Larsen received 3.111.2003 Abstract: Unlike the Ural Mountains, the Altai, and the Tien Shan, the steppe region of Cen­ tral Asia has been poorly investigated with respect to butterflies - distribution maps of the re­ gion's species (1994) show only a handful occurring within a 300 km radius of Karaganda in Central Kazakstan. It is therefore not surprising that approaching 100 additional species were discovered in the Karaganda Oblast during collecting in 1997, 2001 and 2002. During two days of collecting west of the Balkash Lake in May 1997, nine species were identified. On the steppes in the Kazakh Highland, 30 to 130 km south of Karaganda, about 50 butterflies were identified in 2001 and 2002, while in the Karkaralinsk forest, 200 km east of Karaganda, about 70 were encountered. Many of these insects are also to be found in western Europe and almost all of those noted at Karkaralinsk and on the steppes occur in South-Western Siberia. Observations revealed Zegris eupheme to be penetrating the area from the west and Chazara heydenreichi from the south. However, on the western side of Balkash Lake the picture ap­ peared to change. Many of the butterflies found here in 1997 - Parnassius apollonius, Zegris pyrothoe, Polyommatus miris, Plebeius christophi and Lyela myops - mainly came from the south, these belonging to the semi-desert and steppe fauna of Southern Kazakstan.
    [Show full text]
  • Relational Database Systems 1
    Relational Database Systems 1 Wolf-Tilo Balke Jan-Christoph Kalo Institut für Informationssysteme Technische Universität Braunschweig www.ifis.cs.tu-bs.de Summary last week • Data models define the structural constrains and possible manipulations of data – Examples of Data Models: • Relational Model, Network Model, Object Model, etc. – Instances of data models are called schemas • Careful: Often, sloppy language is used where people call a schema also a model • We have three types of schemas: – Conceptual Schemas – Logical Schemas – Physical Schemas • We can use ER modeling for conceptual and logical schemas Relational Database Systems 1 – Wolf-Tilo Balke – Institut für Informationssysteme – TU Braunschweig 2 Summary last week • Entity Type Name • Weak Entity Type Name • Attribute name • Key Attribute name • name Multi-valued Attribute name name • Composite Attribute name • Derived Attribute name • Relationship Type name • Identifying Relationship Type name EN 3.5 Relational Database Systems 1 – Wolf-Tilo Balke – Institut für Informationssysteme – TU Braunschweig 3 Summary last week • Total participation of E2 in R E1 r E2 • Cardinality – an instance of E1 may relate to multiple instances of E2 (0,*) (1,1) E1 r E2 • Specific cardinality with min and max – an instance of E1 may relate to multiple instances of E2 (0,*) (0,1) E1 r E2 EN 3.5 Relational Database Systems 1 – Wolf-Tilo Balke – Institut für Informationssysteme – TU Braunschweig 4 3 Extended Data Modeling • Alternative ER Notations • Extended ER – Inheritance – Complex Relationships
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Use and Population Structure of Protected Butterflies
    DE TTK 1949 HABITAT USE AND POPULATION STRUCTURE OF PROTECTED BUTTERFLIES VÉDETT NAPPALI LEPKÉK ÉLŐHELYHASZNÁLATA ÉS POPULÁCIÓSZERKEZETE Egyetemi doktori (PhD) értekezés ÖRVÖSSY NOÉMI témavezető DR. VARGA ZOLTÁN DEBRECENI EGYETEM Természettudományi Doktori Tanács Juhász-Nagy Pál Doktori Iskola Debrecen, 2014. Ezen értekezést a Debreceni Egyetem Természettudományi Doktori Tanács Juhász-Nagy Pál Doktori Iskola Biodiverzitás programja keretében készítettem a Debreceni Egyetem természettudományi doktori (PhD) fokozatának elnyerése céljából. Debrecen, 2014. december 10. Örvössy Noémi Tanúsítom, hogy Örvössy Noémi doktorjelölt 2004- 2014 között a fent megnevezett Doktori Iskola Biodiverzitás programjának keretében irányításommal végezte munkáját. Az értekezésben foglalt eredményekhez a jelölt önálló alkotó tevékenységével meghatározóan hozzájárult. Az értekezés elfogadását javasolom. Debrecen, 2014. december 10. Prof. Dr. Varga Zoltán HABITAT USE AND POPULATION STRUCTURE OF PROTECTED BUTTERFLIES Értekezés a doktori (Ph.D.) fokozat megszerzése érdekében a biológia. tudományágban Írta: Örvössy Noémi okleveles biológus Készült a Debreceni Egyetem Juhász-Nagy Pál doktori iskolája (Biodiverzitás programja) keretében Témavezető: Dr. Varga Zoltán A doktori szigorlati bizottság: elnök: Dr. Pócsi István ....................................................... tagok: Dr. Rózsa Lajos ....................................................... Dr. Földvári Mihály ....................................................... A doktori szigorlat időpontja: 2013. február
    [Show full text]
  • Coccidology. the Study of Scale Insects (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Coccoidea)
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria (E-Journal) Revista Corpoica – Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria (2008) 9(2), 55-61 RevIEW ARTICLE Coccidology. The study of scale insects (Hemiptera: Takumasa Kondo1, Penny J. Gullan2, Douglas J. Williams3 Sternorrhyncha: Coccoidea) Coccidología. El estudio de insectos ABSTRACT escama (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: A brief introduction to the science of coccidology, and a synopsis of the history, Coccoidea) advances and challenges in this field of study are discussed. The changes in coccidology since the publication of the Systema Naturae by Carolus Linnaeus 250 years ago are RESUMEN Se presenta una breve introducción a la briefly reviewed. The economic importance, the phylogenetic relationships and the ciencia de la coccidología y se discute una application of DNA barcoding to scale insect identification are also considered in the sinopsis de la historia, avances y desafíos de discussion section. este campo de estudio. Se hace una breve revisión de los cambios de la coccidología Keywords: Scale, insects, coccidae, DNA, history. desde la publicación de Systema Naturae por Carolus Linnaeus hace 250 años. También se discuten la importancia económica, las INTRODUCTION Sternorrhyncha (Gullan & Martin, 2003). relaciones filogenéticas y la aplicación de These insects are usually less than 5 mm códigos de barras del ADN en la identificación occidology is the branch of in length. Their taxonomy is based mainly de insectos escama. C entomology that deals with the study of on the microscopic cuticular features of hemipterous insects of the superfamily Palabras clave: insectos, escama, coccidae, the adult female.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny, Biogeography and Systematic Revision of Plain Long-Nosed Squirrels (Genus Dremomys, Nannosciurinae) Q ⇑ Melissa T.R
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 94 (2016) 752–764 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Phylogeny, biogeography and systematic revision of plain long-nosed squirrels (genus Dremomys, Nannosciurinae) q ⇑ Melissa T.R. Hawkins a,b,c,d, , Kristofer M. Helgen b, Jesus E. Maldonado a,b, Larry L. Rockwood e, Mirian T.N. Tsuchiya a,b,d, Jennifer A. Leonard c a Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, Center for Conservation and Evolutionary Genetics, National Zoological Park, Washington DC 20008, USA b Division of Mammals, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 37012, Washington DC 20013-7012, USA c Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Conservation and Evolutionary Genetics Group, Avda. Americo Vespucio s/n, Sevilla 41092, Spain d George Mason University, Department of Environmental Science and Policy, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA 20030, USA e George Mason University, Department of Biology, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA 20030, USA article info abstract Article history: The plain long-nosed squirrels, genus Dremomys, are high elevation species in East and Southeast Asia. Received 25 March 2015 Here we present a complete molecular phylogeny for the genus based on nuclear and mitochondrial Revised 19 October 2015 DNA sequences. Concatenated mitochondrial and nuclear gene trees were constructed to determine Accepted 20 October 2015 the tree topology, and date the tree. All speciation events within the plain-long nosed squirrels (genus Available online 31 October 2015 Dremomys) were ancient (dated to the Pliocene or Miocene), and averaged older than many speciation events in the related Sunda squirrels, genus Sundasciurus.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancillariidae
    WMSDB - Worldwide Mollusc Species Data Base Family: ANCILLARIIDAE Author: Claudio Galli - [email protected] (updated 06/lug/2017) Class: GASTROPODA --- Taxon Tree: CAENOGASTROPODA-NEOGASTROPODA-OLIVOIDEA ------ Family: ANCILLARIIDAE Swainson, 1840 (Sea) - Alphabetic order - when first name is in bold the species has images DB counters=528, Genus=16, Subgenus=11, Species=356, Subspecies=20, Synonyms=124, Images=342 abdoi, Ancillus abdoi Awad & Abed, 1967 † (FOSSIL) abessensis , Alocospira abessensis Lozouet, 1992 † (FOSSIL) abyssicola , Amalda abyssicola Schepman, 1911 acontistes , Ancilla acontistes Kilburn, 1980 acuminata , Ancilla acuminata (Sowerby, 1859) acuta , Amalda acuta Ninomiya, 1991 acutula , Eoancilla acutula Stephenson, 1941 † (FOSSIL) adansoni , Ancilla adansoni Blainville, 1825 - syn of: Anolacia mauritiana (Sowerby, 1830) adelaidensis , Ancilla adelaidensis Ludbrook, 1958 † (FOSSIL) adelphae , Ancilla adelphae Bourguignat, 1880 - syn of: Ancilla adelphe Kilburn, 1981 adelphe , Ancilla adelphe Kilburn, 1981 aegyptica, Ancilla aegyptica Oppenheim, 1906 † (FOSSIL) africana , Vanpalmeria africana Adegoke, 1977 † (FOSSIL) agulhasensis , Ancilla agulhasensis Thiele, 1925 - syn of: Ancilla ordinaria Smith, 1906 akontistes , Turrancilla akontistes (Kilburn, 1980) akontistes , Ancilla akontistes Kilburn, 1980 - syn of: Turrancilla akontistes (Kilburn, 1980) alazana , Ancillina alazana Cooke, 1928 † (FOSSIL) alba , Ancilla alba Perry, 1811 - syn of: Bullia vittata (Linnaeus, 1767) albanyensis , Amalda albanyensis Ninomiya,
    [Show full text]