DOCSLIB.ORG

Full Versions of Final Reports for Nlos

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Full Versions of Final Reports for Nlos Legal Study on Homophobia and Discrimination on Grounds of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity United Kingdom January 2014 Update Authors of the 2014 Update: David Harris Therese Murphy Jeffrey Kenner Toni Johnson Ana Filipa Santos Franet contractor: Human Rights Law Centre, University of Nottingham Authors of the 2010 Update and 2008 report: David Harris Therese Murphy Jeffrey Kenner Toni Johnson DISCLAIMER: This document was commissioned under contract as background material for comparative analysis by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) for the project ‘Protection against discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation, gender identity and sex characteristics in the EU, Comparative legal analysis, Update 2015’. The information and views contained in the document do not necessarily reflect the views or the official position of the FRA. The document is made publicly available for transparency and information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or legal opinion. Contents Executive summary .............................................................................................................. 1 1 Implementation of Employment Directive 2000/78/EC .......................................... 9 1.1 Equality Act Personal and Material Scope ................................................................... 12 1.2 Equality Act Occupational Requirements .................................................................... 18 1.3 Equality Act Enforcement for Employment ................................................................. 20 1.4 Implementation of Article 9/2 of Directive 2000/78 .................................................... 21 1.5 National Human Rights Institution – Equality and Human Rights Commission ......... 22 2 Freedom of movement .............................................................................................. 24 3 Asylum and subsidiary protection .......................................................................... 29 3.1 Asylum Framework ...................................................................................................... 29 3.2 Jurisprudential evolution of LGBT asylum claims ...................................................... 31 3.3 Subsidiary Protection ................................................................................................... 34 3.4 Humanitarian Protection............................................................................................... 35 3.5 Discretionary Leave ..................................................................................................... 36 3.6 Reuniting LGBT families in the asylum system .......................................................... 37 3.6.1 UK based partner has refugee status ................................................................. 37 3.6.2 UK based partner has been granted humanitarian protection .......................... 38 4 Family reunification ................................................................................................. 40 4.1 Entry as a civil partner.................................................................................................. 40 4.2 Entry as a ‘proposed’ civil partner ............................................................................... 41 Civil partnership ‘visit’ visa ......................................................................................... 42 4.3 Recognition of legal partnerships and same-sex marriages entered into abroad- Applicants applying from overseas .............................................................................. 42 4.4 Applications for ‘leave to remain’ emanating from within the UK ............................. 43 4.5 Same-sex partners rule ................................................................................................. 43 5 Freedom of assembly ................................................................................................ 46 6 Criminal law .............................................................................................................. 49 6.1 Incitement to hatred ...................................................................................................... 49 6.2 Homophobic motivation as an aggravating factor in a common crime ........................ 52 7 Transgender issues .................................................................................................... 55 7.1 Discrimination against transgender people in employment, vocational training, and the provision of goods, facilities and services .................................................................... 55 7.2 Freedom of Movement, Asylum and Subsidiary Protection, and Family Reunification ...................................................................................................................................... 59 7.3 Freedom of Assembly .................................................................................................. 60 7.4 Criminal Law ................................................................................................................ 60 7.5 Legislation regarding names and changes of names for transgender people................ 61 7.6 Legislation regarding change of gender/sex ................................................................. 62 7.7 Other relevant legislation ............................................................................................. 64 8 Miscellaneous ............................................................................................................ 65 9 Intersex ...................................................................................................................... 66 9.1 Legislation, jurisprudence and policies ........................................................................ 66 9.2 Surgical and medical interventions .............................................................................. 67 10 Good practices ........................................................................................................... 70 10.1 Criminal law: homophobic and transphobic crimes ..................................................... 70 10.1.1 Assisted or third party reporting of homophobic and transphobic crimes ........ 70 10.1.2 Incitement to hatred on grounds of sexual orientation ...................................... 71 10.1.3 Pioneering Public NGO Research into Homophobic and Transphobic Crimes 71 10.2 Transgender People and Employment .......................................................................... 72 10.2.1 Job Applications and Criminal Record Information .......................................... 72 10.2.2 ‘Gender Reassignment: A Guide for Employers’ ............................................... 73 10.3 Education on sexual orientation ................................................................................... 74 10.4 Government Policies .................................................................................................... 74 11 Annex 1 – Case law ................................................................................................... 76 11.1 Chapter 2, the interpretation and/or implementation of Employment Equality Directive 2000/78/EC ................................................................................................................... 76 11.1.1 Chapter 2, the interpretation and/or implementation of Employment Equality Directive 2000/78/EC, case 1 ............................................................................ 76 11.1.2 Chapter 2, the interpretation and/or implementation of Employment Equality Directive 2000/78/EC, case 2 ............................................................................ 77 11.1.3 Chapter 2, interpretation and/or implementation of Employment Equality Directive 2000/78/EC, case 3 ............................................................................ 78 11.1.4 Chapter 2, interpretation and/or implementation of Employment Equality Directive 2000/78/EC, case 4 ............................................................................ 79 11.1.5 Chapter 2, interpretation and/or implementation of Employment Equality Directive 2000/78/EC, case 5 ............................................................................ 80 11.1.6 Chapter 2, interpretation and/or implementation of Employment Equality Directive 2000/78/EC, case 6 ............................................................................ 82 11.1.7 Chapter 2, interpretation and/or implementation of Employment Equality Directive 2000/78/EC, case 7 ............................................................................ 83 11.1.8 Chapter 2, interpretation and/or implementation of Employment Equality Directive 2000/78/EC, case 8................................................................................................ 84 11.1.9 Chapter 2, interpretation and/or implementation of Employment Equality Directive 2000/78/EC, case 9................................................................................................ 85 11.1.10 Chapter 2, interpretation and/or implementation of Employment Equality Directive 2000/78/EC, case 10 .......................................................................... 86 11.1.11 Chapter 2, interpretation and/or implementation of Employment Equality Directive 2000/78/EC, case 11 .......................................................................... 87 11.1.12 Chapter 2, interpretation and/or
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LGBT Rights at Work
    LGBT Rights at Work An advice leaflet for Usdaw Members Rights for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) Workers As a result of many years of Although the Equality Act has not been enacted in Northern Ireland, similar campaigning by lesbian, gay, legislation applies protecting LGBT people bisexual and transgender from discrimination. The information in this leaflet therefore applies equally to LGBT (LGBT) organisations and members in Northern Ireland. Trade Unions, LGBT workers As well as the recent improvements in now enjoy the same rights at legal rights, social attitudes have also dramatically changed but this doesn’t mean work as their heterosexual that harassment and discrimination relating (straight) colleagues. to sexual orientation or gender identity has disappeared from our workplaces. The Equality Act, introduced in October Millions of LGBT workers still don’t feel 2010 in England, Scotland and Wales, made safe enough to be out about their sexual it unlawful for employers to discriminate orientation or gender identity at work and against someone or harass them for reasons thousands of these workers will be Usdaw relating to either their sexual orientation or members. This leaflet summarises the legal their gender identity. rights LGBT members have at work. 1 The issues Gender Identity The law also means that transgender Whilst Usdaw recognises that lesbians, gay members are fully protected from men, bisexuals and transgender members discrimination by the law. A transgender each have distinct and separate problems at person is someone who lives their life in work, they also share a range of concerns a gender different to that in which they and experiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Policy 2018 – 2020
    Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Policy 2018 – 2020 1 Contents About this document................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 5 What does Equality, Diversity and Inclusion mean to the HCPC? .............................. 5 Legal duties ................................................................................................................ 6 Vision and values ....................................................................................................... 8 Equality, diversity and inclusion objectives ................................................................. 9 Setting measures ..................................................................................................... 10 Measuring success................................................................................................... 10 Accountability ........................................................................................................... 11 More Information ...................................................................................................... 13 Contact us ................................................................................................................ 13 2 About Us We are the Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC). We are a regulator and we were set up to protect the public. To do this, we keep a register of professionals
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in the Commonwealth
    Human Rights, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in The Commonwealth Struggles for Decriminalisation and Change Edited by Corinne Lennox and Matthew Waites Human Rights, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in The Commonwealth: Struggles for Decriminalisation and Change Edited by Corinne Lennox and Matthew Waites © Human Rights Consortium, Institute of Commonwealth Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London, 2013 This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NCND 4.0) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/ Available to download free at http://www.humanities-digital-library.org ISBN 978-1-912250-13-4 (2018 PDF edition) DOI 10.14296/518.9781912250134 Institute of Commonwealth Studies School of Advanced Study University of London Senate House Malet Street London WC1E 7HU Cover image: Activists at Pride in Entebbe, Uganda, August 2012. Photo © D. David Robinson 2013. Photo originally published in The Advocate (8 August 2012) with approval of Sexual Minorities Uganda (SMUG) and Freedom and Roam Uganda (FARUG). Approval renewed here from SMUG and FARUG, and PRIDE founder Kasha Jacqueline Nabagesera. Published with direct informed consent of the main pictured activist. Contents Abbreviations vii Contributors xi 1 Human rights, sexual orientation and gender identity in the Commonwealth: from history and law to developing activism and transnational dialogues 1 Corinne Lennox and Matthew Waites 2
    [Show full text]
  • Vision for Change: Acceptance Without Exception for Trans People
    A VISION FOR CHANGE Acceptance without exception for trans people 2017-2022 A VISION FOR CHANGE Acceptance without exception for trans people Produced by Stonewall Trans Advisory Group Published by Stonewall [email protected] www.stonewall.org.uk/trans A VISION FOR CHANGE Acceptance without exception for trans people 2017-2022 CONTENTS PAGE 5 INTRODUCTION FROM STONEWALL’S TRANS ADVISORY GROUP PAGE 6 INTRODUCTION FROM RUTH HUNT, CHIEF EXECUTIVE, STONEWALL PAGE 7 HOW TO READ THIS DOCUMENT PAGE 8 A NOTE ON LANGUAGE PAGE 9 EMPOWERING INDIVIDUALS: enabling full participation in everyday and public life by empowering trans people, changing hearts and minds, and creating a network of allies PAGE 9 −−THE CURRENT LANDSCAPE: o Role models o Representation of trans people in public life o Representation of trans people in media o Diversity of experiences o LGBT communities o Role of allies PAGE 11 −−VISION FOR CHANGE PAGE 12 −−STONEWALL’S RESPONSE PAGE 14 −−WHAT OTHERS CAN DO PAGE 16 TRANSFORMING INSTITUTIONS: improving services and workplaces for trans people PAGE 16 −−THE CURRENT LANDSCAPE: o Children, young people and education o Employment o Faith o Hate crime, the Criminal Justice System and support services o Health and social care o Sport PAGE 20 −−VISION FOR CHANGE PAGE 21 −−WHAT SERVICE PROVIDERS CAN DO PAGE 26 −−STONEWALL’S RESPONSE PAGE 28 −−WHAT OTHERS CAN DO PAGE 30 CHANGING LAWS: ensuring equal rights, responsibilities and legal protections for trans people PAGE 30 −−THE CURRENT LANDSCAPE: o The Gender Recognition Act o The Equality Act o Families and marriage o Sex by deception o Recording gender o Asylum PAGE 32 −−VISION FOR CHANGE PAGE 33 −−STONEWALL’S RESPONSE PAGE 34 −−WHAT OTHERS CAN DO PAGE 36 GETTING INVOLVED PAGE 38 GLOSSARY INTRODUCTION FROM STONEWALL’S TRANS ADVISORY GROUP The UK has played an While many of us benefited from the work to give a voice to all parts of trans successes of this time, many more communities, and we are determined important role in the did not.
    [Show full text]
  • Lydia Foy and the Struggle for Transgender Rights in Ireland
    Lydia Foy and the Struggle for Transgender Rights in Ireland In March 1993 transgender woman Lydia Foy wrote to the Irish Registrar of Births seeking a new birth certificate in her female gender. Nearly 21 years later she is still waiting. Ireland is now the only state in the European Union that does not have any procedure for the legal recognition of transgender persons. And Lydia Foy is still fighting for the right to be officially recognised in the gender she has been living in for the last 21 years. Taking a legal challenge After four years of fruitless correspondence with the Registrar’s office, Lydia, represented by legal human rights group Free Legal Advice Centres Ireland (FLAC), issued legal proceedings in the Irish High Court in April 1997. It was a hard and painful struggle. Lydia’s marriage had broken up under the strain of her transition to her female gender. She had lost her home, her family and her job as a health service dentist. “I was completely alone ...I had one door after another closed in my face. Even those who sympathised with my case felt they could do nothing to help – they certainly couldn’t support me in public”. The Court hearing lasted for 14 days with a distressing and intrusive scrutiny of Lydia’s personal life and sensational media coverage. At the end, in July 2002, the Judge rejected Lydia’s claim. He was sympathetic but he could not find anything in Irish law that would allow her to change the gender in which she had originally been registered.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Feminist Judgment Foy V an Tard Chlaraitheoir
    Draft Feminist Judgment for Foy v An t-Ard Chláraitheoir Lydia Foy, Plaintiff v. An t-Ard Chláraitheoir, Defendants; Jennifer and Claire Foy, Notice Parties [2007] IEHC 470, [2006 No. 33 S.P.]; [2009] IESC 1 High Court 19 th October, 2007 Supreme Court 19 th November, 2009 Ní Mhuirthile J. 19 th November, 2009 Introduction [1] Labour wards all over the world reverberate to joyous exclamations of ‘it’s a boy!’ or ‘it’s a girl!’ A seemingly simple statement: one that lies at the very heart of this case. At its core, this case revolves around the question of how legal gender is constructed. How does one become a man or a woman for the purposes of coming sui juris ? Is the exclamation in the birthing chamber and the consequent recording of sex on the birth certificate a definitive determination on a point of law, or is it merely, as Mr Justice McKechnie noted in the 2002 High Court judgment on this matter, “a “snap shot” of matters on a particular day and does not purport to be otherwise”? If the latter, how then is legal gender determined? This is the question which the appellant asks this Court to resolve. [2] The appellant was born on Monday 23rd June, 1947 in Athlone, Co. Westmeath. As required by law, the appellant’s mother registered the birth of her baby, naming her child “Donal Mark” and noting her baby’s sex as male. The case arises as the appellant asserts that as he grew he developed a female gender identity.
    [Show full text]
  • Religion, the Rule of Law and Discrimination Transcript
    Religion, the Rule of Law and Discrimination Transcript Date: Thursday, 26 June 2014 - 6:00PM Location: Barnard's Inn Hall 26 June 2014 Religion, the Rule of Law and Discrimination The Rt Hon. Sir Terence Etherton Chancellor of the High Court of England and Wales 1. One of the most difficult and contentious areas of our law today is the resolution of disputes generated by a conflict between, on the one hand, the religious beliefs of an individual and, on the other hand, actions which that individual is required to take, whether that requirement is by a public body, a private employer or another individual. The problem is particularly acute where the conflict is directly or indirectly between one individual’s religious beliefs and another’s non-religious human rights.[1] 2. It is a subject that affects many countries as they have become more liberal, multicultural and secular.[2] The issues in countries which are members of the Council of Europe and of the European Union, like England and Wales, are affected by European jurisprudence as well as national law. The development of the law in England is of particular interest because the Protestant Church is the established Church of England but the protection for secular and other non-Protestant minorities has progressed at a pace and in a way that would have been beyond the comprehension of most members of society, including judges and politicians, before the Second World War. 3. This subject is large and complex and the law relevant to it is growing at a remarkably fast pace.[3] For the purpose of legal commentary, it falls naturally into two parts: (1) tracing the legal history and reasons for the developments I have mentioned, and (2) analysing the modern jurisprudence.
    [Show full text]
  • LGBT History Month 2016
    Inner Temple Library LGBT History Month 2016 ‘The overall aim of LGBT History Month is to promote equality and diversity for the benefit of the public. This is done by: increasing the visibility of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (“LGBT”) people, their history, lives and their experiences in the curriculum and culture of educational and other institutions, and the wider community; raising awareness and advancing education on matters affecting the LGBT community; working to make educational and other institutions safe spaces for all LGBT communities; and promoting the welfare of LGBT people, by ensuring that the education system recognises and enables LGBT people to achieve their full potential, so they contribute fully to society and lead fulfilled lives, thus benefiting society as a whole.’ Source: www.lgbthistorymonth.org.uk/about Legal Milestones ‘[A] wallchart has been produced by the Forum for Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Equality in Further and Higher Education and a group of trade unions in association with Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans (LGBT) History Month. The aim has been to produce a resource to support those raising awareness of sexual orientation and gender identity equality and diversity. Centred on the United Kingdom, it highlights important legal milestones and identifies visible and significant contributions made by individuals, groups and particularly the labour movement.’ Source: www.lgbthistorymonth.org.uk/wallchart The wallchart is included in this leaflet, and we have created a timeline of important legal milestones. We have highlighted a selection of material held by the Inner Temple Library that could be used to read about these events in more detail.
    [Show full text]
  • Statutory Code of Practice: Services, Public Functions and Associations
    Equality Act 2010 Code of Practice Services, public functions and associations Statutory Code of Practice Equality Act 2010 Code of Practice Services, public functions and associations Statutory Code of Practice Equality Act 2010 Statutory Code of Practice Services, public functions and associations www.equalityhumanrights.com © Equality and Human Rights Commission (2011) The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental and agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Equality and Human Rights Commission copyright and the document title specified. Where third party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at www.equalityhumanrights.com This publication is also available on www.official-documents.gov.uk ISBN: 9780108509728 ID P002411441 01/11 Printed in the UK by The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. Contents 01 Contents 15 Foreword 17 Chapter 1: Introduction 17 Purpose of the Equality Act 2010 18 Status of the Code 18 Scope of the Code 19 Age as a protected characteristic 20 Marriage and Civil Partnership 20 Purpose of the Code 21 Human Rights 22 Large and small service providers 22 How to use the Code 23 Examples in the Code
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the Equality Act 2010 on Charities
    The Impact of the Equality Act 2010 on Charities Debra Morris, Anne Morris and Jennifer Sigafoos Charity Law & Policy Unit, School of Law and Social Justice, University of Liverpool Published by: Charity Law & Policy Unit University of Liverpool Liverpool L69 7ZA August 2013 website: http://www.liv.ac.uk/law/research/charity-law-and-policy/about/ © Charity Law & Policy Unit ISBN 978-0-9536666-6-9 ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 1 I Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 9 II Overview/ General Themes ......................................................................................................... 17 III The Legal Context: Charity Law ................................................................................................ 29 IV The Legal Context: Equality Laws ............................................................................................. 41 V The Legal Context: Interrelation between Charity and Equality Law ........................... 90 VI Case Studies .................................................................................................................................. 104 Religious Charities 104 Higher Education 117 Single-sex Provision 135 Challenges to Public Sector Spending Cuts 142 VII Conclusion and Recommendations ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PILA and PILS Conference Political Commitment, Practical Protection, Using the ECHR, North and South the Long Road to Change
    PILA and PILS Conference Political Commitment, Practical Protection, Using the ECHR, North and South The Long Road to Change – The Case of Lydia Foy Michael Farrell, Senior Solicitor, FLAC I have been asked to talk about the Lydia Foy case as a case study of the use of the European Convention on Human Rights 2003, and particularly the provision for a Declaration of Incompatibility with the Convention, as tools for protecting the rights of marginalised communities. But first of all I would like to go back a good bit further in time to October 1962, the month I started as a student in Queens University, Belfast, and a story that made a deep impression on me at the time. For that month another student was enrolling in another university 5000 miles away. James Meredith was the first black student to enrol in the University of Mississippi in the rigidly segregated deep South of the United States. A federal court had ordered that Meredith should be admitted to the university but a huge crowd of white segregationists gathered to stop him and President Kennedy had to send in the National Guard and regular troops to control the situation. That was eight years after the most famous public interest law case of them all, Brown v The Board of Education 1, where the US Supreme Court ordered the desegregation of schools in Topeka, Kansas. And it was long after 1962 before US schools and colleges were fully integrated – to the extent that they are even today. I mention this story just to make the point that while winning court battles is an important and sometimes crucial step in securing legal and social change, it is 1 US Supreme Court, Brown v Board of Education , 347 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting the Public Sector Equality Duty Stonewall Scotland Guide To
    A GUIDE FOR PUBLIC AUTHORITIES ON MEETING THE PUBLIC SECTOR EQUALITY DUTY A guide for public authorities on meeting the Public Sector Equality Duty 1 2 FOREWORD The Equality Act 2010 and the Public Sector Equality Duty are some of the most important legal safeguards for LGBT equality. They go further than prohibiting discrimination and harassment - they put a legal obligation on public bodies to act to reduce inequalities faced by LGBT people in day to day life. But too many public authorities struggle with these duties, whether it’s setting equality outcomes that have a direct positive impact on issues LGBT people face, or gathering information about the sexual orientation of their employees. This guide is here to help you meet your obligations to LGBT people under the Public Sector Equality Duty, and use the duty to create real change. As well as guiding you through writing equality outcomes to tackle the barriers faced by LGBT people, this guide will show you how to find and use data on LGBT people’s experiences. We’ll also share some of the best practice we’ve gathered through working with public authorities all across Scotland, giving you sample templates and equality outcomes to work with. Public authorities affect our lives every day, making them vital partners in our ongoing work for LGBT equality. Stonewall Scotland already works with public authorities all over Scotland, from criminal justice agencies and health boards to colleges and local authorities, helping them to support and include their LGBT staff and service users. All our work is driven by your needs, so please do take us up on our offer of support.
    [Show full text]