Note on the Historical Results Deducible from Recent Discoveries in Afghanistan Henry Thoby Prinsep
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Seleucid Coinage and the Legend of the Horned Bucephalas
Seleucid coinage and the legend of the horned Bucephalas Autor(en): Miller, Richard P. / Walters, Kenneth R. Objekttyp: Article Zeitschrift: Schweizerische numismatische Rundschau = Revue suisse de numismatique = Rivista svizzera di numismatica Band (Jahr): 83 (2004) PDF erstellt am: 04.10.2021 Persistenter Link: http://doi.org/10.5169/seals-175883 Nutzungsbedingungen Die ETH-Bibliothek ist Anbieterin der digitalisierten Zeitschriften. Sie besitzt keine Urheberrechte an den Inhalten der Zeitschriften. Die Rechte liegen in der Regel bei den Herausgebern. Die auf der Plattform e-periodica veröffentlichten Dokumente stehen für nicht-kommerzielle Zwecke in Lehre und Forschung sowie für die private Nutzung frei zur Verfügung. Einzelne Dateien oder Ausdrucke aus diesem Angebot können zusammen mit diesen Nutzungsbedingungen und den korrekten Herkunftsbezeichnungen weitergegeben werden. Das Veröffentlichen von Bildern in Print- und Online-Publikationen ist nur mit vorheriger Genehmigung der Rechteinhaber erlaubt. Die systematische Speicherung von Teilen des elektronischen Angebots auf anderen Servern bedarf ebenfalls des schriftlichen Einverständnisses der Rechteinhaber. Haftungsausschluss Alle Angaben erfolgen ohne Gewähr für Vollständigkeit oder Richtigkeit. Es wird keine Haftung übernommen für Schäden durch die Verwendung von Informationen aus diesem Online-Angebot oder durch das Fehlen von Informationen. Dies gilt auch für Inhalte Dritter, die über dieses Angebot zugänglich sind. Ein Dienst der ETH-Bibliothek ETH Zürich, Rämistrasse 101, 8092 Zürich, Schweiz, www.library.ethz.ch http://www.e-periodica.ch RICHARD P. MILLER AND KENNETH R.WALTERS SELEUCID COINAGE AND THE LEGEND OF THE HORNED BUCEPHALAS* Plate 8 [21] Balaxian est provincia quedam, gentes cuius Macometi legem observant et per se loquelam habent. Magnum quidem regnum est. Per successionem hereditariam regitur, quae progenies a rege Alexandra descendit et a filia regis Darii Magni Persarum... -
Problems of Chronology in Gandhāran Art
Rienjang and Stewart (eds) Problems of Chronology in Gandhāran Art Edited by Wannaporn Rienjang Peter Stewart Problems of Chronology in Gandhāran Art Since the beginning of Gandhāran studies in the nineteenth century, chronology has been one of the most significant challenges to the understanding of Gandhāran art. Many other ancient societies, including those of Greece and Rome, have left a wealth of textual sources which have put their fundamental chronological frameworks beyond doubt. In the absence of such sources on a similar scale, even the historical eras cited on inscribed Gandhāran works of art have been hard to place. Few sculptures have such inscriptions and the majority lack any record of find-spot or even general provenance. Those known to have been found at particular sites were sometimes moved and reused in antiquity. Consequently, the provisional dates assigned to extant Gandhāran sculptures have sometimes differed by centuries, while the narrative of artistic development remains doubtful and inconsistent. Building upon the most recent, cross-disciplinary research, debate and excavation, this volume reinforces a new consensus about the chronology of Gandhāra, bringing the history of Gandhāran art into sharper focus than ever. By considering this tradition in its wider context, alongside contemporary Indian art and subsequent developments in Central Asia, the authors also open up fresh questions and problems which a new phase of research will need to address. Problems of Chronology in Gandhāran Art is the first publication of the Gandhāra Connections project at the University of Oxford’s Classical Art Research Centre, which has been supported by the Bagri Foundation and the Neil Kreitman Foundation. -
History of India
HISTORY OF INDIA VOLUME - 2 History of India Edited by A. V. Williams Jackson, Ph.D., LL.D., Professor of Indo-Iranian Languages in Columbia University Volume 2 – From the Sixth Century B.C. to the Mohammedan Conquest, Including the Invasion of Alexander the Great By: Vincent A. Smith, M.A., M.R.A.S., F.R.N.S. Late of the Indian Civil Service, Author of “Asoka, the Buddhist Emperor of India” 1906 Reproduced by Sani H. Panhwar (2018) Preface by the Editor This volume covers the interesting period from the century in which Buddha appeared down to the first centuries after the Mohammedans entered India, or, roughly speaking, from 600 B.C. to 1200 A.D. During this long era India, now Aryanized, was brought into closer contact with the outer world. The invasion of Alexander the Great gave her at least a touch of the West; the spread of Buddhism and the growth of trade created new relations with China and Central Asia; and, toward the close of the period, the great movements which had their origin in Arabia brought her under the influences which affected the East historically after the rise of Islam. In no previous work will the reader find so thorough and so comprehensive a description as Mr. Vincent Smith has given of Alexander’s inroad into India and of his exploits which stirred, even if they did not deeply move, the soul of India; nor has there existed hitherto so full an account of the great rulers, Chandragupta, Asoka, and Harsha, each of whom made famous the age in which he lived. -
Gandharan Sculptures in the Peshawar Museum (Life Story of Buddha)
Gandharan Sculptures in the Peshawar Museum (Life Story of Buddha) Ihsan Ali Muhammad Naeem Qazi Hazara University Mansehra NWFP – Pakistan 2008 Uploaded by [email protected] © Copy Rights reserved in favour of Hazara University, Mansehra, NWFP – Pakistan Editors: Ihsan Ali* Muhammad Naeem Qazi** Price: US $ 20/- Title: Gandharan Sculptures in the Peshawar Museum (Life Story of Buddha) Frontispiece: Buddha Visiting Kashyapa Printed at: Khyber Printers, Small Industrial Estate, Kohat Road, Peshawar – Pakistan. Tel: (++92-91) 2325196 Fax: (++92-91) 5272407 E-mail: [email protected] Correspondence Address: Hazara University, Mansehra, NWFP – Pakistan Website: hu.edu.pk E-mail: [email protected] * Professor, Department of Archaeology, University of Peshawar, Currently Vice Chancellor, Hazara University, Mansehra, NWFP – Pakistan ** Assistant Professor, Department of Archaeology, University of Peshawar, Pakistan CONTRIBUTORS 1. Prof. Dr. Ihsan Ali, Vice Chancellor Hazara University, Mansehra, Pakistan 2. Muhammad Naeem Qazi, Assistant Professor, Department of Archaeology, University of Peshawar, Pakistan 3. Ihsanullah Jan, Lecturer, Department of Cultural Heritage & Tourism Management, Hazara University 4. Muhammad Ashfaq, University Museum, Hazara University 5. Syed Ayaz Ali Shah, Department of Archaeology, University of Peshawar, Pakistan 6. Abdul Hameed Chitrali, Lecturer, Department of Cultural Heritage & Tourism Management, Hazara University 7. Muhammad Imran Khan, Archaeologist, Charsadda, Pakistan 8. Muhammad Haroon, Archaeologist, Mardan, Pakistan III ABBREVIATIONS A.D.F.C. Archaeology Department, Frontier Circle A.S.I. Archaeological Survery of India A.S.I.A.R. Archaeological Survery of India, Annual Report D.G.A. Director General of Archaeology E.G.A.C. Exhibition of the German Art Council I.G.P. Inspector General Police IsMEO Instituto Italiano Per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente P.M. -
The Western Kshatrapa Dāmazāda 173
THE WESTERN KSHATRAPA DĀMAZĀDA 173 The Western Kshatrapa Dāmazāda PANKAJ TANDON1 IN THEIR comprehensive survey of the coinage of the Western Kshatrapas, Jha and Rajgor2 (hereinafter J&R) argue that Rudradāman I had three sons who followed him in ruling their kingdom: J&R name them Dāmajadasri, Dāmaghsada, and Rudrasimha. In this J&R went against the view of Rapson who, in his catalogue of Western Kshatrapa coins in the British Museum,3 had speculated that Dāmajadasri and Dāmaghsada were in fact the same person. Most authors seem to have accepted Jha and Rajgor’s view.4 In this paper, I present new information that strengthens the argument that these ‘two’ rulers were indeed one, and that his name was Dāmazāda. Part of the argument involves a radical new proposal: that we can distinguish different mints for the Western Kshatrapa coinage. This innovation also helps resolve another century-old problem. The crux of the issue revolves around the fact that the name ‘Dāmaghsada’ as it is inscribed on the coins contains an unusual Brāhmī compound letter that is transliterated by most numismatists as ghsa. This letter appears also in the name of Chastana’s father, normally written as Ghsamotika. In the fi rst part of the paper, I argue that these names should be presented differently, as Zamotika and Dāmazāda, to better represent the way they must have been pronounced. The argument has two parts: fi rst, that the compound letter is in fact not ghsa but ysa, and, second, that this compound letter (regardless of whether it was written as ysa or ghsa) was intended to represent the foreign sound za for which Brāhmī had no representation. -
Catalog List 10
Persic Gallery P.O.Box 130372, Boston MA, 02113 Tel 617-286-2351 [email protected] www.persicgallery.com List No. 10: February 2013 !! Persic Gallery P.O.Box 130372 - Boston - MA 02113 • www.persicgallery.com Table of Contents Ancient 1 Arab Sasanian 3 Islamic: Iran- The Early Dynasties 3 Islamic: Central Asia 4 Islamic: Afghan Dynasties 4 Islamic: Civic Copper 5 India: Sultanates 6 India: Mughal Empire 6 Modern Afghanistan 7 ! Persic Gallery - P.O.Box 130372 - Boston - MA 02113 • www.persicgallery.com List 10- February 2013 Ancient 9-90039: !Indo Scythian. Azes II. AE unit. 58-20 BC. Brahma bull right; monogram above/ Lion right; monogram above. MIG-850I, RS-102.110, vf, 13.85g. !$110 2-7223: !Bactrian. Eucratides I. AR Obol. 170-145 BC. Diade- med bust right/ palms and pilei of Dioscuri right. 39-39057:!Indo Scythian. Azes II. AE penta-chalkon. 58-12 BC. MIG-180d, vf, 0.61g. !$150 Elephant advancing right; letter above/ Zebu stand- ing right; two monograms above. MIG-817c, 2-7234:!Indo Greek. Agathocleia with Strato. AE hemi-obol. RS-100.40, axf, 10.2g. !$150 130-125BC. Helmeted bust of Athena right/ Hercules seated left on rock holding club. Dark brown patina. 39-39059:!Indo Scythian. Azes. AR tetradrachm. 57-35 BC. King MIG-307a, Bop-3, axf, 8.4g. !$250 on horseback right, holding spear; monograms be- fore/ Tyche standing left, holding lamp and palm; 2-7235: !Indo Greek. Zoilos I. AE square hemi-obol. 130-120 monogram before and behind. MIG-801d, RS-56.522T, BC. -
BATTRIA (Afganistan) Pagina 1 Di 3 BATTRIA=BACTRIA=BATTRIANA
BATTRIA (Afganistan) BATTRIA=BACTRIA=BATTRIANA=GRECO-BATTRIANO A PERSIA a.C. 520-329 a.C. Satrapi 520-510 DARSHISH 510- -340 340-329 BESSO=BESSUS A MACEDONIA a.C. 329-312 a.C. (a.C. 329-301 a.C.) Re macedoni 330-323 ALESSANDRO il Grande=Magno (ALESSANDRO III re Macedonia) (sposa ROXANA) 323-317 FILIPPO=FILIPPO Arrideo (fratellastro)(FILIPPO III re Macedonia) 317-310 ALESSANDRO (figlio di ALESSANDRO Magno)(ALESSANDRO IV re Macedonia) Satrapi 329 ARTABAZO=ARTABAZUS 329 CLITO il Nero=CLITUS 328-321 AMINTA NICCOLAO=AMYNTAS NIKOLAOS 328-321 SCITEO=SCYTHAEUS 323-321 FILIPPO 321-312 STASANORE=STASANOR il Soliano A SIRIA (SELEUCIDI) a.C. 312-256 a.C. Satrapi REGNO a.C. 256-10 a.C. (a.C. 250-10 a.C.) *Dinastia Diodotidea **Dinastia Eutidemiana=Eutidemide=Magnesiaca=di Magnesia ***Dinastia Eucratide=Eucratidea #Dinastia Diodotidea 256-248 (256-230)(256-235)(256-246)(250-230)(250-240) DIODOTO I=DIODOTUS I=DIODOTOS I=DIODITO I=TEODOTO I= DIODOTO I SOTERO=DIODOTO SOTER (satrapo di PARTIA)(in Battria- Sogdiana-Fergana-Aracosia)* 248-235 (230-200)(235)(250-230)(230)(246-227)(240-230)(235-230)(248-230) DIODOTO II (figlio)(primo re)* 235 (230)(200)(227) ANTIOCO=ANTIOCO NICATORE (incerto)* 235-200(230-200)(227-189)(200-190)(223-200)(235-195) EUTIDEMO I=EUTIDEMO TEO=EUTIDEMO THEOS=EUTHYDEMUS I (forse satrapo in Sogdiana)(in Battria-Sogdiana-Fergana-Margiana-Ariana)** 200-190(190-180)(200-171)(190-175)(189-167)(200-185)(200-180)(200-195)(195-180) DEMETRIO I l’Invincibile=DEMETRIOS I (figlio)(in Battria-Sogdiana- Fergana-Margiana-Ariana-Paropamisade-Aracosia-Gandara-Punjab-Kashmir) -
Posthumous Azes Coins in Stupa Deposits from Ancient Afghanistan
Posthumous Azes Coins In stupa deposits from ancient Afghanistan ONS 2 March 2013 ‘Donation of Śivarakṣita, son of Mujavada, offered with relics of the Lord, in honour of all buddhas’ Deposits from Bimaran 2 stupa with the gold casket and Posthumous Azes coins Courtesy of Piers Baker Shevaki Stupa, Kabul Courtesy of Piers Baker Shevaki Stupa from afar Courtesy of Piers Baker Guldara Stupa, Kabul The ‘Indo-Scythians’ kings and satraps in coin sequences (Based on Errington & Curtis 2007) Kings Satraps Basileos / Maharaja Satrap, Strategos / Chatrap Maues (c.75-65BC) Kharahostes (early 1st AD) Vonones (c.65-50BC) Zeionises (c.AD30-50) Spalyrises (c.50-40BC) Rajavula Azes I (c.46-1BC) Aspavarma (c.AD33-64)* Azilises (c.1BC-AD16) * With the name ‘Azes’ on the obverse Azes II (c.16-30AD) Indo-Scythian coins from Buddhist sites in ancient Pakistan and Afghanistan (Based on Errington 1999/2000) Swat Darunta/Jalalabad/ Peshawar Hadda Taxila Posthumous Azes Maues c.75-65BC Azilises c.1BC-AD16 Zeionises c.AD30-50 Vonones c.65-50BC Azes II c.AD16-30 Rajavula Azes I c.46-1BC Kharahostes early 1st AD Aspavarma c.AD33-64 Pontic to Central Asian steppes Iranian Plateau Arabia Nomadic and sedentary groups living in areas extending from the Pontic to Central Asian steppes during the first millennium BC ‘Σκυϑοι’ in Greek sources / ‘Sakas’ in Iranian sources ‘Śakas’ in Indian sources / ‘Sai’ or ‘Se’ in Chinese sources Three types of Sakas according to the Naqš-i-Rustam inscription of Darius I Sakas ‘who are across the sea’ (Saka Paradraya) The Pontic steppe -
UNIT 148 – UPSC - HISTORY and IMPACT of Indo-Greeks
GAUTAM SINGH UPSC STUDY MATERIAL – INDIAN HISTORY 0 7830294949 UNIT 148 – UPSC - HISTORY AND IMPACT OF Indo-Greeks After Alexander the Great, the greed seleukidan dynasty of Persia held on to the trans-Indus region. After seleukos Nikator was defeated by Chanragupta Maurya in 303 B.C. the trans-Indus region was transferred to the Mauryas. In mid third century B.C. the seleukidan rule was ended by two peoples. In Iran the parthiar became independent and their sassanians in 226 A.D. In like manner the greeks of Bactria rose in revolt under the leadership of Diodotus. These Greeks were later known as Indo-Greeks when they gained a foot-hold in the Indian sub-continent. Bactria situated between the Hindu Kush and the oxus, was a fertile region and it controlled the trade routes from Gandhara to the West. The greek settlement in Bactria began in the 5th century B.C. when Persian emperors settled the Greek exiles in that area. Bactria figured in history with the revolt of diodotus against Antiochus the seleukidan king. This breakaway of Bactria was recnised by the seleukidans when the grandson of Diodotus, Enthymemes. Was given a seleukidan bride in about 200 B.C. About the same time the seleukidan king defeated king subhagasena after crossing the Hindu Kush in 206 B.C. This defeat reveals the unguarded nature of northwestern India. Thus begins the history of Indo-Greeks. The history of the Indo-Greeks is mainly gathered from their coins. This evidence is very often confusion because many kings had identical names. -
Gandhara: an Appriasal of Its Meanings and History
Mr. Tauqeer Ahmad Warraich GANDHARA: AN APPRIASAL OF ITS MEANINGS AND HISTORY Gandhara---Meaning: The word Gandhara makes its first appearance in the oldest religious literature of South Asia, i-e, Rig-veda (Griffeth 1968:652), which is generally thought to have approximately been composed between 1500 to 1000 BC (Basham 1963:31). So for as the meanings of the world Gandhara is concerned it is often translated as ‘the land of fragrance’------- taking “gand” as fragrance and “hara” the land. Thus, the composite form of the word Gandhara suggests “a country or piece of land the soil of which yielded abundant fragrance and because of this quality it, apparently, came to be known as Gandhara ‘the land of fragrance’. In the Vedic and -Puranic literaute the Gandhara is frequently referred to as “Uttara” (northern) country, inhabited by gandharas (Raposn 1955:26). Moreover, kien-to-lo of the Chinese pilgrims is also identified as Gandhara (Cuningham 1924:55). The measurement of its boundaries are however for the first time described only by Xuan Zang (Beal 1969:55). Thus, the country of kien-to-lo measures 1000 li east to west and 800 li form north to west. This measurement corresponds with present valley of Peshawar as it is marked by Jalalabad hills on its west and eastern limits by river Sindhu, Swat and Burner hills on northern, and Kala Bagh hills on southern sides, respectively (Cunningham 1924:55). It seems that the term Gandhara is not unusual in the region as we have other nomenclatures on the same pattern such as Nagarahara, Pothohara (or correctly Pithohara), Vanahara etc, which are stretching to western and eastern sides of Gandhara. -
Rudradaman I (Reign 130 AD – 150 AD)
Origins Scythians (referred to as Sakas in Indian sources) were a group of Iranian nomadic pastoral tribes. In the second century BC, central Asian nomadic tribes and tribes from the Chinese region invaded the region of present-day Kazakhstan whose inhabitants were Scythians. This promoted the Scythians to move towards Bactria and Parthia. After defeating the Parthian king, they moved towards India. Scythians who migrated to India are known as Indo-Scythians. The Sakas had an Indian kingdom larger than the Indo-Greeks. Maues (Reign 80 BC – 65 BC) Maues, also known as Moga was the earliest Indo-Scythian king. He ruled over Gandhara (present Pakistan and Afghanistan). He invaded the Indo-Greek territories but unsuccessfully. His capital was at Sirkap (Punjab, Pakistan). Many coins issued by Maues have been found. They contain Buddhist and also Hindu symbols. The languages used in these coins were Greek and Kharoshti. His son Azes I acquired the remaining Indo-Greek territories by defeating Hippostratos. Chastana (Reign 78 AD – 130 AD) He was a Saka ruler of the Western Kshatrapas (Satraps) dynasty who ruled over Ujjain. The Saka Era is believed to have started at his ascension to power in 78 AD. Ptolemy mentions him as “Tiasthenes” or “Testenes”. He was the founder of one of the two major Saka Kshatrapa dynasties in northwest India, the Bhadramukhas. The other dynasty was called Kshaharatas and included the king Nahapana (who was defeated by Satavahana king Gautamiputra Satakarni). Rudradaman I (Reign 130 AD – 150 AD) He is considered the greatest of the Saka rulers. He is from the Western Kshatrapa dynasty. -
Sogdiana During the Hellenistic Period by Gurtej Jassar B.Sc, Th
Hellas Eschate The Interactions of Greek and non-Greek Populations in Bactria- Sogdiana during the Hellenistic Period by Gurtej Jassar B.Sc, The University of British Columbia, 1992 B.A.(Hon.), The University of British Columbia, 1995 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Department of Classical, Near Eastern, and Religious Studies) We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA April 1997 ©Gurtej Jassar, 1997 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of OA,S5J The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada DE-6 (2/88) II ABSTRACT This study deals with the syncretism between Greek and non-Greek peoples as evidenced by their architectural, artistic, literary and epigraphic remains. The sites under investigation were in the eastern part of the Greek world, particularly Ai Khanoum, Takht-i-Sangin, Dilberdjin, and Kandahar. The reason behind syncretism was discussed in the introduction, which included the persistence of the ancient traditions in Egypt, Mesopotamia, and Bactria even after being conquered by the Greeks.