DOCSLIB.ORG

Geology and Coal Resources Op North Park, Colorado

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geology and Coal Resources Op North Park, Colorado DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIBECTOR' 596 GEOLOGY AND COAL RESOURCES OP NORTH PARK, COLORADO BY A. L. BEEKLY WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1915 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction _ ______ _,___________ 7 Location and area__ _ _ _____. __________1___ 7 Accessibility_________________________________ 8 Explorations in the region________________________ 8 Preparation of the map___________________________ 10 Base map_.______________________________ 10 ' Field work_______________________________ 10 Office work______________._________ __ 11 Acknowledgments_______________________________ 11 Geography ______________ ______________________ 12 Relief______________________________________ 12 Major features..____________.________________ 12 Medicine Bow Range_______.________ ______ 12 Park Range____________________________ 13 Continental Divide____________.___________ 13 Floor of the park____________ '._.___________ 13 Minor features________________:_. ______ 14 Drainage___________________ ______________ 16 Settlement__________i_______________________ 18 Stratigraphy __________ __________.___________ 19 Sedimentary rocks ______________________________ 19 Age and correlation.. ______!____ .___________ 19 Geologic section________________._________'_ 20 Carboniferous (?) system_______________________ 21 Pennsylvanfan or Permian (?) series______________ 21 Distribution and character_____.___________ 21 Stratigraphic relations________.___________ 21 Fossils_____________________________ 22 Triassic (?) system___________________________ 23 Chugwater formation_______________________ 23 Distribution, character, and thickness__________ 23 Stratigraphic relations____________________ 24 Fossils____________________________ 26 Jurassic or Cretaceous system___ ____ _ 26 Morrison formation___________________^___ .26 : Character, thickness, and distribution___________ 26 Stratigraphic relations_________________ _ 27 Fossils,________________________._____ 29 Cretaceous system (Upper Cretaceous series).__ 30 Dakota sandstone____________________ _ 30 Correlation_____________________ __ 30 Character and thickness__________ 30 Distribution ____ ________ 31 Stratigraphic relations __________ _ 33 Fossils _________.,__________________ 34 3 4 CONTENTS. Stratigraphy Continued. Page. Sedimentary rocks Continued. Cretaceous system (Upper Cretaceous series) Continued. Colorado group __________________'__________- 34 General features_______________:_______ 34 Benton shale ________________________ 34 Character and thickness________:________ 34 Distribution _______________________ 35 Stratigraphic relations.___________ ___ 36 Fossils _________,.________________ 38 Niobrara formation_____________________ 39 Distribution, character, and thickness________ 39 Stratigraphic relations________________ 41 Fossils __________________________ 42 Montana group _________________________._ 43 General features____________________ __ 43 Pierre shale___.______________________ 43 Character and thickness__^____._________ 43 Distribution _______________________ 45 Stratigraphic relations_________________ 45 Fossils __________________:________ 47 Cretaceous or Tertiary system_______________ ___ 49 Coalmont formation____________________ _ __ 49 General features_________________________ 49 Character and thickness____________ _ 50 Distribution __________________________ 58 Stratigraphic relations_______________ 58 Fossils _________*___________________ 61 Tertiary system___________:_________________ 66 North Park formation_______________________ 66 Designation__________________________ 66 Character and thickness_______:___________ 66 Distribution ______________1*._________ 67 Stratigraphic relations_________________ 68 Quaternary system ______________;__ ___ 71 General features_________________________ 71 Alluvium ______________________"- 71 Terrace gravel______'____________________ 72 Dune sand _____________________:_____ 72 Glacial deposits and glaciation___________________ 73 General features_______________________ 73 Park Range______________________ __ 74 Arapaho Creek ___:_______________________ 75 Medicine Bow Range____________________- 75 Igneous and metamorphic rocks______________________ 76 General features_______________..___..________^__ 76 Crystalline rocks___r._______________________'________ __ 76 Volcanic rocks__l___________ _ _ _____ _ 78 Extent of volcanism____ ________ 78 Distribution and character '____ .. 78 Age of eruptive rocks__ _ 81 Structure___________________ :~ 81 General character and representation_____ _ 81 CONTENTS. 0 Structure Continued. ' Page. Major features. _ _____ _________ 82 Location and character_________________________ 82 Park Range and Medicine Bow uplifts_________ 82 Divide between North and Middle parks________ 83 Independence Mountain fault _______.____________ 83 Minor features. _______________________"__ 83 Faults __________________________________ 83 Extent and influence_________________ ___ 83 Independence Mountain fault____________ 84 Sheep Mountain fault series______________ __ 84 Sentinel Mountain fault _______________ __ 86 Kerr ranch fault__________________________ 86 Hill Valley fault___._______________________ 88 Fault near north end of McCallum anticline___ _ 88 Miscellaneous small faults__ __ _ __ 89 Folds _______________________1________ 89 Location and origin__________________ ___ 89 North Park syncline_______________________ 90 McCallum anticline__________________________ 90 Folds near the Kerr ranch,________________ ______ 92 Pinkham Creek folds______________________ 92 Miscellaneous small folds_______:_______ ____ 93 Economic geology ________ -_________________ ____ 93 Mineral resources_________________________ ____ 93 Coal ______________'________ __________,.____ 93 Geologic occurrence ______________.__-_________ 93 McCallum anticline district________________ ____ 95 General features____________±___________ _ 95 Coal beds of the district_______________ ____ 95 Sudduth bed_________________________ 95 Capron beds_________________ __ _ _ 98 Winscom beds __________________ ____ 98 Hill bed ____________________________ 99 Development _______________________ _ _ 99 McCallum mine ________________ _ 99 Sudduth mine_________________________ 100 Marr mine_____ _______ __ __ _ 100 Kerr mine_^__________________________ 101 Lange, Manning, and Ballinger prospects___ ____ 101 Capron mine_________________________ 101 Winscom mine___________________ ___ 102 .Hill mine-.___________________________ 102 Coalmont district _____________________ ___ 102 General features __________________________ 102 Coal beds______________________________ 103 Riach bed ___________J________________ 103 Lower beds of Coalmont section______________ 104 Development_________________.__________ ' 106 Northern Colorado Coal Co.'s mine____________ 106 Abandoned mines _______ ____________ 106 Local coal areas _____________________________ 107 Mitchell________________'________________ 107 Location and extent-______ _ ___~____ 107 D ILLUSTRATIONS: Economic geology "Continued. c Page. Coal Continued. Local coal areas Continued. Mitchell Continued. - . Coal bed____________________________ 107 Mitchell mine ________________________ 107 Monahan __ __________r___________ 108 Location and extent_____________________ 108 Coal beds _______:___....._____________ 108 Monahan mine_________________________ 108 Colorado Creek _______________,__________ 109 Arapaho Pass____________________________ 109 Character of the coal__________________________ 109 Physical properties________________________ 109 Chemical properties _______________________ 111 Classification.__________________________ 114 Production ______.._ _____'.-_________________________ 114 Estimated tonnage ________..__________________ 114 Future development __________________________ 115 Metals_____________________________________ 116 Copper____________..____________________ 116 Gold._____________..____________________ 117 Silver___________________________________ 117 Gilsonitel___________________________________ 117 Index________________________________i________ 119 ILLUSTRATIONS. Page. PLATE I. A, Eroded sandstone of Coalmont formation; B, Crest of Zir- kel Mountain ___ _____ _________________ 12 II. Floor and rim in southeast part of North Park__________ 13 III. A, Dune sand; B, Banded gneiss near top of Zirkel Mountain.. 72 IV. Mouth of Red Canyon ____ _____ 73 V. A, Weathered granite; B, Erosion forms in granite_______ 78 VI. A, Columnar basalt capping Spicer Peak; B, Volcanic breccia__ 79 VII. Porphyry dike ____ ! 80 VIII. Delanos Butte ___________ _____ _. 81 IX. A, V-shaped fold in Dakota sandstone; B, Marr coal bank 92 X. Sections of coal beds of North Park, Colo__ 96 XI. A, Coalmont from the southeast; B, Upper 30 feet of Riach coal bed ________________________ _-_ 102 XII. Geologic map and sections of North Park, Colo_:_ In pocket. FIGURE 1. Index map of Colorado, showing location of North Park. 7 GEOLOGY AID COAL RESOURCES OF NORTH PARK, COLORADO. By A. L. BEEKLT. INTRODUCTION. LOCATION AND AREA. North Park is a great natural depression in the Rocky Mountains of northern Colorado. Its remoteness from much frequented routes of travel, amounting until recent years almost to isolation, has re­ sulted in its geology remaining but very little known until the pres- 200 MILES FIGURE 1. Index, map of Colorado, showing location of North Park. ent time. It covers about 1,400 square miles, including practically all of Jackson County. (See fig. 1.) Its northern boundary is
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A History of Northwest Colorado
    II* 88055956 AN ISOLATED EMPIRE BLM Library Denver Federal Center Bldg. 50, OC-521 P-O. Box 25047 Denver, CO 80225 PARE* BY FREDERIC J. ATHEARN IrORIAh ORADO STATE OFFICE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 1976 f- W TABLE OF CONTENTS Wb Preface. i Introduction and Chronological Summary . iv I. Northwestern Colorado Prior to Exploitation . 1 II. The Fur Trade. j_j_ III. Exploration in Northwestern Colorado, 1839-1869 23 IV. Mining and Transportation in Early Western Colorado .... 34 V. Confrontations: Settlement Versus the Ute Indians. 45 VI. Settlement in Middle Park and the Yampa Valley. 63 VII. Development of the Cattle and Sheep Industry, 1868-1920... 76 VIII. Mining and Transportation, 1890-1920 .. 91 IX. The "Moffat Road" and Northwestern Colorado, 1903-1948 . 103 X. Development of Northwestern Colorado, 1890-1940. 115 Bibliography 2&sr \)6tWet’ PREFACE Pu£Eose: This study was undertaken to provide the basis for identification and evaluation of historic resources within the Craig, Colorado District of the Bureau of Land Management. The narrative of historic activities serves as a guide and yardstick regarding what physical evidence of these activities—historic sites, structures, ruins and objects—are known or suspected to be present on the land, and evaluation of what their historical significance may be. Such information is essential in making a wide variety of land management decisions effecting historic cultural resources. Objectives: As a basic cultural resource inventory and evaluation tool, the narrative and initial inventory of known historic resources will serve a variety of objectives: 1. Provide information for basic Bureau planning docu¬ ments and land management decisions relating to cultural resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating Natural Visibility Conditions Under the Regional Haze Rule EPA-454/B-03-005 September 2003
    Guidance for Estimating Natural Visibility Conditions Under the Regional Haze Rule EPA-454/B-03-005 September 2003 Guidance for Estimating Natural Visibility Conditions Under the Regional Haze Program Contract No. 68-D-02-0261 Work Order No. 1-06 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Emissions, Monitoring and Analysis Division Air Quality Trends Analysis Group Research Triangle Park, NC DISCLAIMER This report is a work prepared for the United States Government by Battelle. In no event shall either the United States Government or Battelle have any responsibility or liability for any consequences of any use, misuse, inability to use, or reliance upon the information contained herein, nor does either warrant or otherwise represent in any way the accuracy, adequacy, efficacy, or applicability of the contents hereof. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Environmental Protection Agency wishes to acknowledge the assistance and input provided by the following advisors in the preparation of this guidance document: Rodger Ames, National Park Service, Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere (CIRA); Shao-Hang Chu, USEPA; Rich Damberg, USEPA; Tammy Eagan, Florida Dept. of Environmental Protection; Neil Frank, USEPA; Eric Ginsburg, USEPA; Dennis Haddow, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Ann Hess, Colorado State University; Hari Iyer, Dept. of Statistics, Colorado State University; Mike Koerber, Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium; Bill Leenhouts, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; William Malm, National Park Service (CIRA); Debbie Miller, National Park Service; Tom Moore , Western Regional Air Partnership; Janice Peterson, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; Marc Pitchford, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Air Resources Laboratory; Rich Poirot, State of Vermont, Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Range of Variability and Current Landscape Condition Analysis: South Central Highlands Section, Southwestern Colorado & Northwestern New Mexico
    Historical Range of Variability and Current Landscape Condition Analysis: South Central Highlands Section, Southwestern Colorado & Northwestern New Mexico William H. Romme, M. Lisa Floyd, David Hanna with contributions by Elisabeth J. Bartlett, Michele Crist, Dan Green, Henri D. Grissino-Mayer, J. Page Lindsey, Kevin McGarigal, & Jeffery S.Redders Produced by the Colorado Forest Restoration Institute at Colorado State University, and Region 2 of the U.S. Forest Service May 12, 2009 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY … p 5 AUTHORS’ AFFILIATIONS … p 16 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS … p 16 CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION A. Objectives and Organization of This Report … p 17 B. Overview of Physical Geography and Vegetation … p 19 C. Climate Variability in Space and Time … p 21 1. Geographic Patterns in Climate 2. Long-Term Variability in Climate D. Reference Conditions: Concept and Application … p 25 1. Historical Range of Variability (HRV) Concept 2. The Reference Period for this Analysis 3. Human Residents and Influences during the Reference Period E. Overview of Integrated Ecosystem Management … p 30 F. Literature Cited … p 34 CHAPTER II. PONDEROSA PINE FORESTS A. Vegetation Structure and Composition … p 39 B. Reference Conditions … p 40 1. Reference Period Fire Regimes 2. Other agents of disturbance 3. Pre-1870 stand structures C. Legacies of Euro-American Settlement and Current Conditions … p 67 1. Logging (“High-Grading”) in the Late 1800s and Early 1900s 2. Excessive Livestock Grazing in the Late 1800s and Early 1900s 3. Fire Exclusion Since the Late 1800s 4. Interactions: Logging, Grazing, Fire, Climate, and the Forests of Today D. Summary … p 83 E. Literature Cited … p 84 CHAPTER III.
    [Show full text]
  • COLORADO CONTINENTAL DIVIDE TRAIL COALITION VISIT COLORADO! Day & Overnight Hikes on the Continental Divide Trail
    CONTINENTAL DIVIDE NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL DAY & OVERNIGHT HIKES: COLORADO CONTINENTAL DIVIDE TRAIL COALITION VISIT COLORADO! Day & Overnight Hikes on the Continental Divide Trail THE CENTENNIAL STATE The Colorado Rockies are the quintessential CDT experience! The CDT traverses 800 miles of these majestic and challenging peaks dotted with abandoned homesteads and ghost towns, and crosses the ancestral lands of the Ute, Eastern Shoshone, and Cheyenne peoples. The CDT winds through some of Colorado’s most incredible landscapes: the spectacular alpine tundra of the South San Juan, Weminuche, and La Garita Wildernesses where the CDT remains at or above 11,000 feet for nearly 70 miles; remnants of the late 1800’s ghost town of Hancock that served the Alpine Tunnel; the awe-inspiring Collegiate Peaks near Leadville, the highest incorporated city in America; geologic oddities like The Window, Knife Edge, and Devil’s Thumb; the towering 14,270 foot Grays Peak – the highest point on the CDT; Rocky Mountain National Park with its rugged snow-capped skyline; the remote Never Summer Wilderness; and the broad valleys and numerous glacial lakes and cirques of the Mount Zirkel Wilderness. You might also encounter moose, mountain goats, bighorn sheep, marmots, and pika on the CDT in Colorado. In this guide, you’ll find Colorado’s best day and overnight hikes on the CDT, organized south to north. ELEVATION: The average elevation of the CDT in Colorado is 10,978 ft, and all of the hikes listed in this guide begin at elevations above 8,000 ft. Remember to bring plenty of water, sun protection, and extra food, and know that a hike at elevation will likely be more challenging than the same distance hike at sea level.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Studies of the Platte River, South-Central Nebraska and Adjacent Areas—Geologic Maps, Subsurface Study, and Geologic History
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Publications of the US Geological Survey US Geological Survey 2005 Geologic Studies of the Platte River, South-Central Nebraska and Adjacent Areas—Geologic Maps, Subsurface Study, and Geologic History Steven M. Condon Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgspubs Part of the Earth Sciences Commons Condon, Steven M., "Geologic Studies of the Platte River, South-Central Nebraska and Adjacent Areas—Geologic Maps, Subsurface Study, and Geologic History" (2005). Publications of the US Geological Survey. 22. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgspubs/22 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the US Geological Survey at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications of the US Geological Survey by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Geologic Studies of the Platte River, South- Central Nebraska and Adjacent Areas—Geologic Maps, Subsurface Study, and Geologic History Professional Paper 1706 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Studies of the Platte River, South-Central Nebraska and Adjacent Areas—Geologic Maps, Subsurface Study, and Geologic History By Steven M. Condon Professional Paper 1706 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director Version 1.0, 2005 This publication and any updates to it are available online at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/pp1706/ Manuscript approved for publication, March 3, 2005 Text edited by James W. Hendley II Layout and design by Stephen L.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C - Roadless Areas
    Appendix C - Roadless Areas Purpose The purpose of this appendix is to describe roadless areas and the analysis factors used in evaluating individual roadless areas on the Routt National Forest. It includes a description of the physical and biological features, primitive recreation and education opportunities, resources, and present management situation for each area. Background Roadless Area Review and Evaluation In 1970, the Forest Service studied all administratively designated primitive areas and inventoried and reviewed all roadless areas in the National Forest System greater than 5,000 acres. This study was known as the Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (RARE). RARE was halted in 1972 due to legal challenge. RARE identified 711,043 acres of roadless area on the Routt National Forest. In 1977, the Forest Service began another nation-wide Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (RARE II) to identify roadless and undeveloped areas within the National Forest System that were suitable for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System. Twenty nine areas, totalling 566,756 acres, were inventoried on the Routt National Forest (including the Middle Park Ranger District of the Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest). As a result of RARE II, four areas on the forest - Williams Fork, St. Louis Peak, Service Creek, and Davis Peak - were administratively designated as Further Planning Areas (FPA). This further planning area designation meant that more information was needed before the Forest Service would recommend any of these areas to Congress for wilderness designation. In January 1979, the Forest Service issued nationally a Final Environmental Impact Statement documenting a review of 62 million acres of roadless and undeveloped areas within the 191-million-acre National Forest System.
    [Show full text]
  • Region Forest Number Forest Name Wilderness Name Wild
    WILD FIRE INVASIVE AIR QUALITY EDUCATION OPP FOR REC SITE OUTFITTER ADEQUATE PLAN INFORMATION IM UPWARD IM NEEDS BASELINE FOREST WILD MANAGED TOTAL PLANS PLANTS VALUES PLANS SOLITUDE INVENTORY GUIDE NO OG STANDARDS MANAGEMENT REP DATA ASSESSMNT WORKFORCE IM VOLUNTEERS REGION NUMBER FOREST NAME WILDERNESS NAME ID TO STD? SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE FLAG SCORE SCORE COMPL FLAG COMPL FLAG SCORE USED EFF FLAG 02 02 BIGHORN NATIONAL CLOUD PEAK 080 Y 76 8 10 10 6 4 8 10 N 8 8 Y N 4 N FOREST WILDERNESS 02 03 BLACK HILLS NATIONAL BLACK ELK WILDERNESS 172 Y 84 10 10 4 10 10 10 10 N 8 8 Y N 4 N FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP FOSSIL RIDGE 416 N 59 6 5 2 6 8 8 10 N 6 8 Y N 0 N GUNNISON NATIONAL WILDERNESS FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP LA GARITA WILDERNESS 032 Y 61 6 3 10 4 6 8 8 N 6 6 Y N 4 Y GUNNISON NATIONAL FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP LIZARD HEAD 040 N 47 6 3 2 4 6 4 6 N 6 8 Y N 2 N GUNNISON NATIONAL WILDERNESS FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP MOUNT SNEFFELS 167 N 45 6 5 2 2 6 4 8 N 4 6 Y N 2 N GUNNISON NATIONAL WILDERNESS FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP POWDERHORN 413 Y 62 6 6 2 6 8 10 10 N 6 8 Y N 0 N GUNNISON NATIONAL WILDERNESS FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP RAGGEDS WILDERNESS 170 Y 62 0 6 10 6 6 10 10 N 6 8 Y N 0 N GUNNISON NATIONAL FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP UNCOMPAHGRE 037 N 45 6 5 2 2 6 4 8 N 4 6 Y N 2 N GUNNISON NATIONAL WILDERNESS FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP WEST ELK WILDERNESS 039 N 56 0 6 10 6 6 4 10 N 6 8 Y N 0 N GUNNISON NATIONAL FOREST 02 06 MEDICINE BOW-ROUTT ENCAMPMENT RIVER 327 N 54 10 6 2 6 6 8 6
    [Show full text]
  • The Routt National Forest
    100 YEARS OF CONSERVATION AND PUBLIC SERVICE ON THE ROUTT NATIONAL FOREST The Early History of Forest Reserves and National Forests that formed the Routt National Forest by Mary Peterson, Forest Supervisor 2005 marks the 100th anniversary of conservation and public service for the Forest Service nationally! The Routt National Forest has also been the result of a long and colorful history in the last 100+ years! Over the next year, I’d like to share with you some of this great history of the Routt National Forest in a series of articles to celebrate our Centennial. The Routt National Forest is comprised of the dramatic and beautiful Park, Gore, Medicine Bow, Elkhead, and Flat Tops Mountain Ranges. Fortunately for us today, the beauty and resources of these mountain ranges were recognized by early conservation leaders and were set aside as forest reserves, national forests, and a national park. Over the last 100+ years, the current Routt National Forest experienced several boundary and name changes. Following is a brief reconstruction of those changes. The current Routt National Forest was produced from the entire Park Range Forest Reserve and portions of the Medicine Bow, Sierra Madre, and White River Plateau Forest Reserves, established respectively in 1905, 1902, 1906, and 1891. By an Act of Congress approved March 4, 1907, the forest reserves were renamed “national forests”, thus resulting in the creation of the Park Range, Medicine Bow, Sierra Madre, and White River National Forests. Portions of the current Routt National Forest contained portions of these four "early" national forests as well as portions of the Hayden, Colorado, and Arapaho National Forests, and Rocky Mountain National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildland Shrubs, Seed, Soil, Restoration, Rehabilitation, Seed Bank, Seed
    Soils and Vegetation of the Snowy Range, Southeastern Wyoming Wildland Shrub Symposium Field Trip: Laramie to Woods Landing, Riverside, Libby Flats, and Centennial, Wednesday, August 14, 2002 Larry Munn C. Lynn Kinter Laramie, Wyoming, was established as a railroad con- trains also used 2 million gallons of water each day from the struction town in May, 1868. The transcontinental railroad Laramie River. Stops along the track where coal and water (Union Pacific) came across the Rockies in the late 1860s, were available developed into towns, for example, Rawlins across the then unsettled landscape that now contains and Rock Springs. We left town heading southwest via Cheyenne and Laramie, after a southern route through Highway 230. Elevation at Laramie is 7,170 ft (2,185 m), and Colorado was rejected because of the terrain. A relic of the precipitation is 10.5 inches (26 cm), most of which falls in Tertiary Ogallala formation called the “Gangplank” west of March through July. Cheyenne provided an access ramp across the mountains; Stop 1: University of Wyoming, Monolith Ranch by this was the first place north of Denver where it was feasible the fishing access to a Laramie River site with greasewood to build the railroad. It was also the first place west of (Sarcobatus vermiculatus). This is an area that was farmed Missouri that railroad ties could be cut from the surrounding at the turn of the last century. In 1906, a grain elevator forests, and railroaders timbered for ties extensively in the capable of loading 50,000 bushels onto railroad cars daily Laramie and Snowy Ranges (about 3,000,000 ties were cut was built in Laramie.
    [Show full text]
  • Qt53v080hx.Pdf
    UC Berkeley PaleoBios Title A new Early Pliocene record of the toothless walrus Valenictus (Carnivora, Odobenidae) from the Purisima Formation of Northern California Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/53v080hx Journal PaleoBios, 34(0) ISSN 0031-0298 Author Boessenecker, Robert W. Publication Date 2017-06-15 DOI 10.5070/P9341035289 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California PaleoBios 34:1-6, June 15, 2017 PaleoBios OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA MUSEUM OF PALEONTOLOGY Boessenecker, Robert W. (2017). A New Early Pliocene Record of the Toothless Walrus Valenictus (Carnivora, Odobenidae) from the Purisima Formation of Northern California. Cover photo: Life restoration of the extinct Pliocene walrus Valenictus and flightless auks (Mancalla) hauled out on the rocky shore of the uplifted Coast Ranges of California (top right); cliff exposures of the Purisima Formation near Santa Cruz, from where Valenictus was collected by Wayne Thompson (left); bivalves, chiefly Clinocardium meekianum, exposed in the Purisima Formation near the locality (bottom). Photo credit and original artwork: Robert W. Boessenecker. Citation: Boessenecker, Robert W. 2017. A New Early Pliocene Record of the Toothless Walrus Valenictus (Carnivora, Odobenidae) from the Puri- sima Formation of Northern California. PaleoBios, 34. ucmp_paleobios_35289 A New Early Pliocene Record of the Toothless Walrus Valenictus (Carnivora, Odobenidae) from the Purisima Formation of Northern California ROBERT W. BOESSENECKER1,2 1Department of Geology and Environmental Geosciences, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC 29424; [email protected] 2University of California Museum of Paleontology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 The walrus (Odobenus rosmarus) is a large tusked molluskivore that inhabits the Arctic and is the sole living member of the family Odobenidae.
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Geologic Resources Division Denver, Colorado Rocky Mountain National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Report Rocky Mountain National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Geologic Resources Division Denver, Colorado U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, DC Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... 1 Dedication and Acknowledgements............................................................................ 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 3 Purpose of the Geologic Resource Evaluation Program ............................................................................................3 Geologic Setting .........................................................................................................................................................3 Geologic Issues............................................................................................................. 5 Alpine Environments...................................................................................................................................................5 Flooding......................................................................................................................................................................5 Hydrogeology .............................................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]