DOCSLIB.ORG

Region Forest Number Forest Name Wilderness Name Wild

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Region Forest Number Forest Name Wilderness Name Wild WILD FIRE INVASIVE AIR QUALITY EDUCATION OPP FOR REC SITE OUTFITTER ADEQUATE PLAN INFORMATION IM UPWARD IM NEEDS BASELINE FOREST WILD MANAGED TOTAL PLANS PLANTS VALUES PLANS SOLITUDE INVENTORY GUIDE NO OG STANDARDS MANAGEMENT REP DATA ASSESSMNT WORKFORCE IM VOLUNTEERS REGION NUMBER FOREST NAME WILDERNESS NAME ID TO STD? SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE FLAG SCORE SCORE COMPL FLAG COMPL FLAG SCORE USED EFF FLAG 02 02 BIGHORN NATIONAL CLOUD PEAK 080 Y 76 8 10 10 6 4 8 10 N 8 8 Y N 4 N FOREST WILDERNESS 02 03 BLACK HILLS NATIONAL BLACK ELK WILDERNESS 172 Y 84 10 10 4 10 10 10 10 N 8 8 Y N 4 N FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP FOSSIL RIDGE 416 N 59 6 5 2 6 8 8 10 N 6 8 Y N 0 N GUNNISON NATIONAL WILDERNESS FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP LA GARITA WILDERNESS 032 Y 61 6 3 10 4 6 8 8 N 6 6 Y N 4 Y GUNNISON NATIONAL FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP LIZARD HEAD 040 N 47 6 3 2 4 6 4 6 N 6 8 Y N 2 N GUNNISON NATIONAL WILDERNESS FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP MOUNT SNEFFELS 167 N 45 6 5 2 2 6 4 8 N 4 6 Y N 2 N GUNNISON NATIONAL WILDERNESS FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP POWDERHORN 413 Y 62 6 6 2 6 8 10 10 N 6 8 Y N 0 N GUNNISON NATIONAL WILDERNESS FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP RAGGEDS WILDERNESS 170 Y 62 0 6 10 6 6 10 10 N 6 8 Y N 0 N GUNNISON NATIONAL FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP UNCOMPAHGRE 037 N 45 6 5 2 2 6 4 8 N 4 6 Y N 2 N GUNNISON NATIONAL WILDERNESS FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP WEST ELK WILDERNESS 039 N 56 0 6 10 6 6 4 10 N 6 8 Y N 0 N GUNNISON NATIONAL FOREST 02 06 MEDICINE BOW-ROUTT ENCAMPMENT RIVER 327 N 54 10 6 2 6 6 8 6 N 6 2 N N 2 N NATIONAL FOREST WILDERNESS 02 06 MEDICINE BOW-ROUTT HUSTON PARK 326 N 54 10 6 2 6 6 8 6 N 6 2 N N 2 N NATIONAL FOREST WILDERNESS 02 06 MEDICINE BOW-ROUTT MOUNT ZIRKEL 034 Y 60 6 6 10 4 6 8 6 N 6 4 N N 4 Y NATIONAL FOREST WILDERNESS 02 06 MEDICINE BOW-ROUTT PLATTE RIVER 348 Y 63 0 5 0 10 10 8 10 N 10 6 N N 4 N NATIONAL FOREST WILDERNESS 02 06 MEDICINE BOW-ROUTT SARVIS CREEK 417 Y 78 10 10 10 6 6 10 10 N 10 6 N N 0 N NATIONAL FOREST WILDERNESS 02 06 MEDICINE BOW-ROUTT SAVAGE RUN 130 N 52 10 10 0 4 2 8 6 N 6 4 N N 2 Y NATIONAL FOREST WILDERNESS 02 07 NEBRASKA NATIONAL SOLDIER CREEK 359 N 54 6 10 0 4 6 8 6 Y 6 8 Y N 0 N FOREST WILDERNESS 02 09 RIO GRANDE NATIONAL SOUTH SAN JUAN 171 Y 67 10 5 10 6 10 8 4 N 8 6 Y N 0 N FOREST WILDERNESS 02 10 ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT BYERS PEAK 412 Y 60 6 10 6 6 6 8 6 N 6 4 N N 2 Y NATIONAL FOREST WILDERNESS 02 10 ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT CACHE LA POUDRE 160 Y 62 6 6 6 6 6 10 6 Y 6 8 Y N 2 Y NATIONAL FOREST WILDERNESS 02 10 ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT COMANCHE PEAK 162 Y 62 6 6 6 6 6 6 8 N 6 8 Y N 4 Y NATIONAL FOREST WILDERNESS 02 10 ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT INDIAN PEAKS 134 Y 61 6 5 10 6 6 6 6 N 6 8 Y N 2 Y NATIONAL FOREST WILDERNESS 02 10 ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT JAMES PEAK 427 Y 63 6 5 10 6 4 8 6 N 6 8 Y N 4 N NATIONAL FOREST WILDERNESS 02 10 ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NEOTA WILDERNESS 168 Y 62 6 6 6 6 6 10 6 Y 6 8 Y N 2 Y NATIONAL FOREST 02 10 ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NEVER SUMMER 169 Y 64 6 10 6 6 6 8 8 N 8 4 N N 2 Y NATIONAL FOREST WILDERNESS 02 10 ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT RAWAH WILDERNESS 035 Y 60 6 6 6 6 6 6 8 N 6 8 Y N 2 Y NATIONAL FOREST 02 10 ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT VASQUEZ PEAK 415 Y 60 6 10 6 6 6 6 6 N 6 6 Y N 2 Y NATIONAL FOREST WILDERNESS 02 12 PIKE-SAN ISABEL NATIONAL BUFFALO PEAKS 410 N 47 6 3 2 6 6 6 8 N 6 4 Y N 0 N FOREST WILDERNESS 02 12 PIKE-SAN ISABEL NATIONAL COLLEGIATE PEAKS 161 N 49 6 3 2 6 6 8 8 N 6 4 Y N 0 N FOREST WILDERNESS 02 12 PIKE-SAN ISABEL NATIONAL GREENHORN MOUNTAIN 411 Y 61 8 5 6 6 6 6 8 N 6 8 Y N 2 Y FOREST WILDERNESS 02 12 PIKE-SAN ISABEL NATIONAL LOST CREEK 164 Y 63 3 6 10 6 6 8 8 N 6 8 Y N 2 Y FOREST WILDERNESS 02 12 PIKE-SAN ISABEL NATIONAL MOUNT EVANS 165 Y 63 3 6 10 6 6 8 8 N 6 8 Y N 2 Y FOREST WILDERNESS 02 12 PIKE-SAN ISABEL NATIONAL MOUNT MASSIVE 166 N 49 6 3 2 6 6 8 8 N 6 4 Y N 0 N FOREST WILDERNESS 02 12 PIKE-SAN ISABEL NATIONAL SANGRE DE CRISTO 414 Y 76 8 10 10 6 8 6 8 N 8 8 Y N 4 Y FOREST WILDERNESS 02 12 PIKE-SAN ISABEL NATIONAL SPANISH PEAKS 426 Y 60 8 6 6 6 6 6 8 N 6 6 Y N 2 Y FOREST WILDERNESS 02 13 SAN JUAN NATIONAL WEMINUCHE 036 Y 84 10 6 10 10 10 10 4 N 10 10 Y Y 4 Y FOREST WILDERNESS 02 14 SHOSHONE NATIONAL FITZPATRICK 117 Y 62 10 6 10 6 4 6 4 N 8 8 Y Y 0 N FOREST WILDERNESS 02 14 SHOSHONE NATIONAL NORTH ABSAROKA 082 Y 60 10 6 10 4 2 4 8 N 8 8 Y Y 0 N FOREST WILDERNESS 02 14 SHOSHONE NATIONAL POPO AGIE WILDERNESS 083 N 56 10 6 10 4 2 4 4 N 8 8 Y Y 0 N FOREST 02 14 SHOSHONE NATIONAL WASHAKIE WILDERNESS 085 Y 62 10 6 10 4 2 6 8 N 8 8 Y Y 0 N FOREST 02 15 WHITE RIVER NATIONAL EAGLES NEST 031 Y 64 10 6 10 4 6 4 8 N 6 8 Y N 2 Y FOREST WILDERNESS 02 15 WHITE RIVER NATIONAL FLAT TOPS WILDERNESS 030 Y 68 10 6 10 6 6 4 10 N 10 2 N N 4 Y FOREST 02 15 WHITE RIVER NATIONAL HOLY CROSS 163 Y 67 10 5 10 4 10 4 8 N 6 8 Y N 2 Y FOREST WILDERNESS 02 15 WHITE RIVER NATIONAL HUNTER-FRYINGPAN 121 Y 61 10 3 10 4 6 8 4 N 8 6 Y N 2 Y FOREST WILDERNESS 02 15 WHITE RIVER NATIONAL MAROON BELLS- 033 Y 78 8 6 10 10 10 10 4 N 10 8 Y N 2 Y FOREST SNOWMASS WILDERNESS 02 15 WHITE RIVER NATIONAL PTARMIGAN PEAK 418 Y 64 10 6 10 4 6 4 8 N 6 8 Y N 2 Y FOREST WILDERNESS AVERAGE 61.46 7.09 6.20 6.70 5.65 6.17 7.04 7.35 6.78 6.65 1.83.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Black Hills Hydrology Study —By Janet M
    Prepared in cooperation with the South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the West Dakota Water Development District The Black Hills Hydrology Study —By Janet M. Carter, Daniel G. Driscoll, and Joyce E. Williamson o Introduction 104o 45' 103 30' Indian Horse o Belle Fourche EXPLANATION 44 45' Reservoir Cr The Black Hills area is an impor- Owl Newell Outcrop of Madison Limestone BELLE Creek Creek tant resource center that provides an Nisland Outcrop of Minnelusa Formation F BELLE FOURCHE OU economic base for western South RCHE RIVER Approximate extent of the Black Hay Creek R E BUTTE CO Vale Hills area, represented by Dakota through tourism, agriculture, I V ER R MEADE CO REDWAT LAWRENCE CO generalized outer extent of the timber, and mineral resources. Water Cox the outcrop of Inyan Kara Saint Creek Lake Crow Onge Group originating from the area is used for Creek reek municipal, industrial, agricultural, and 30' Gulch Spearfish C Whitewood Bear x Gulch Butte Bottom Creek e recreational purposes throughout ls Bear a Creek F Whitewood Butte Higgins much of western South Dakota. The Cr Creek Squ STURGIS Spearfish a Central Tinton Cr w li Iron CityCr ka ood DEADWOOD l o Black Hills area also is an important Cr w A 103 ad 15' Beaver Cr e D Cr Lead Bear h nnie Cr s A berry recharge area for aquifers in the north- i traw f S r Cr Creek Tilford a hitetail e W p Cheyenne Elk S ern Great Plains. Crossing Little Creek Roubaix ek Creek N Elk re Elk Little C Population growth, resource devel- .
    [Show full text]
  • APPEAL of DECISION NOTICE, GUNNISON RANGER DISTRICT Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests
    APPEAL OF DECISION NOTICE, GUNNISON RANGER DISTRICT Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests DOUBLE HEART RANCH, ON BEHALF OF LOCAL LANDOWNERS AND INTERESTED CITIZENS APPELLANTS Notice of Appeal, Statement of Reasons and Request for Relief Regarding the Geothermal Lease Nomination COC- 73584 EA and DN v. CHARLES RICHMOND GMUG FOREST SUPERVISOR AND JOHN MURPHY GUNNISON RANGER DISTRICT RESPONDENTS NOTICE OF APPEAL STATEMENT OF REASONS AND RELIEF REQUESTED DATED this 25 th day of March, 2011 Matthew R. Jones Double Heart Ranch 7500 County Road 887 Gunnison, CO 81230 Direct: (512) 635-7814 Fax: (214) 378-7501 Email: [email protected] David Brown Ranch Manager: (970) 641-0690 1 NOTICE OF APPEAL On February 10, 2011, Forest Supervisor Charles Richmond signed the Decision Notice for Geothermal Lease Nomination COC-73584. This is a Notice of Appeal of that decision pursuant to 36 C.F.R. Part 215. The Double Heart Ranch, Local Landowners, and a great many others use and enjoy the Tomichi Dome, and the surrounding lands covered by this decision. Further, DH Ranch submitted comments at every stage of this process to every agency involved to be considered for this National Environmental Policy Act process. DH Ranch also attended every public meeting, even when notice was grossly insufficient and public comment was inappropriately restricted and prevented. This appeal is timely pursuant to 36 C.F.R. §215.14. Appellant requests that the DN be withdrawn, a proper NEPA process be conducted, and a new decision of No Action be issued, protecting our public resources. THE APPELLANTS The Double Heart Ranch is a historic Colorado property wholly situated on or around the Tomichi Dome and the property encompassed by this decision.
    [Show full text]
  • Tax Lien Sale Notice 2020
    TAX LIEN SALE NOTICE DELINQUENT REAL ESTATE TAXES, AND SPECIAL DISTRICTS, PAYABLE IN 2020 Office of the County Treasurer County of Pueblo State of Colorado INTERNET PUBLIC AUCTION: 2 Day Sale October 19 & 20, 2020 8:00 A.M. county.pueblo.org/treasurer zeusauction.com Tax payment must be received in the Pueblo County Treasurer's Office on or before Thursday, October 15, 2020 by 4:30 p.m., in cash or certified funds to avoid the delinquent property tax lien from being sold. If the property tax is sold at the tax lien sale, YOU WILL BE REQUIRED TO PAY INTEREST AT THE RATE OF NINE PERCENT (9%) PER ANNUM. Redemption payments will be accepted beginning November 6, 2020. Redemption of these taxes must be paid in cash or certified funds within three (3) years or a Treasurer's Deed may be issued to the holder of the tax lien certificate of purchase. All delinquent taxes must be paid to the Pueblo County Treasurer. Please contact the Pueblo County Treasurer's Office for any information regarding delinquent taxes at (719)583-6689, (719)583-6015, or (719)583-6683. DELINQUENT TAXPAYER NAMES WILL APPEAR IN ALL ISSUES OF DELINQUENT TAX LIST. *PUBLISHED IN THE PUEBLO CHIEFTAIN, SEPTEMBER 19, 26 & OCTOBER 3, 2020 *PUBLISHED WEEKLY FOR THREE CONSECUTIVE WEEKS. NO DELETIONS TO THIS ADVERTISING LIST CAN BE MADE. Page 2 PUBLIC NOTICE The Pueblo Chieftain, September/October 2020 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE The Pueblo Chieftain, September/October 2020 PUBLIC NOTICE Page 3 Page 4 PUBLIC NOTICE The Pueblo Chieftain, September/October 2020 PUBLIC NOTICE 3812 AUGUSTA
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Record
    BULL MOOSE SPORTSMENS ALLIANCE/COLORADO BACKCOUNTRY HUNTERS AND ANGLERS/COLORADO TROUT UNLIMITED/COLORADO WILDLIFE FEDERATION/NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION/THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP/TROUT UNLIMITED/WESTERN NATIVE TROUT INITIATIVE Sportsmen's Recommendations for Supporting the Proposed Colorado Roadless Rule Problem 1: At 562,000 acres, the upper tier category in the preferred alternative is too small and fails to include much of the most important fish and wildlife habitat. Solution: After further upper tier areas are included by the agency for the Pike-San Isabel and Rio Grande national forests, the acreage of upper tier lands in the preferred alternative should increase to a total of at least 1.4 million acres (33% of Colorado's road less acres) using the prioritized list of road less areas below. Upper tier lands bordering Community Protection Zones may be cut back in acreage so the bordering areas are not included in the upper tier (the overlap is roughly 22,000 acres total). All Alternative 2 lands already placed in upper tier should remain there. Rationale: The upper tier category has been created to balance narrowly defined exceptions in the CO rule such as coal mining, ski area development, and community protection zone logging. This is very similar to the "Primitive" and "Wild Land Recreation" categories used to balance development allowances in the Idaho roadless rule. While important, the preferred alternative (alt. 2) acres are limited to areas where forest plans already prohibit road building. Using these acres as upper tier does not address key fish and wildlife habitat nor does it illustrate a commitment by the Forest Service to go beyond their current plans and create a truly protective rule.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Locatable Mineral Reports for Colorado, South Dakota, and Wyoming provided to the U.S. Forest Service in Fiscal Years 1996 and 1997 by Anna B. Wilson Open File Report OF 97-535 1997 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. CONTENTS page INTRODUCTION ................................................................... 1 COLORADO ...................................................................... 2 Arapaho National Forest (administered by White River National Forest) Slate Creek .................................................................. 3 Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests Winter Park Properties (Raintree) ............................................... 15 Gunnison and White River National Forests Mountain Coal Company ...................................................... 17 Pike National Forest Land Use Resource Center .................................................... 28 Pike and San Isabel National Forests Shepard and Associates ....................................................... 36 Roosevelt National Forest Larry and Vi Carpenter ....................................................... 52 Routt National Forest Smith Rancho ............................................................... 55 San Juan National
    [Show full text]
  • It's Unfair to the People of This Area for Us To
    “It’s unfair to the people of this area for us to collect taxes from our customers to help TVA [Tennessee Valley Authority] sell power at a lower price to their customers.” NEIL SIMPSON, President, Black Hills Power and Light Company 60 Expanding Futures on the Great Plains 4 EXPANDING FUTURES ON THE GREAT PLAINS Black Hills Power and Light continued to expand. The company absorbed smaller utilities. It offered power and transmission services to other areas in collaboration with public power agencies and rural electric cooperatives. But tensions with the rural cooperatives were building over territories and customers. As the federal government began to construct dams and hydroelectric facilities on the Missouri River, company officials scrambled to hold onto Black Hills Power and Light’s market and customers. 61 Expanding Futures on the Great Plains Govenor Peter Norbeck’s plan to build a dam dams on the river would revive the state’s proponents of the public power district bill were and hydroelectric facilities on the Missouri River economy. Their efforts to encourage the federal able to convince legislators that new districts after World War I died for lack of sufficient government to build a series of dams gained were needed to secure the power to be generated demand, but the idea lingered in the minds of momentum in 1943 after spring floods caused by Missouri River hydroelectric plants. The public many policymakers in Pierre and Washington, major damage to downstream communities, power district bill passed in 1950. D.C. After drought, depression and war, South especially Omaha, Nebraska.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests Road - Light Duty ¤£87 Q Private Intermittent Stream 550 Disclaimer ¤£ ¤£50 114 U.S
    9 9 9 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 9 2 2 0 00 0 9000 0 0 0 9 9 000 0 2 9 0 200 9 0 96 0 2 0 00 0 ! 00 ! 90 8800 90 C o 94 ! 00 k 9600 a e 0 17 80 l e 8 9 ! 9 9 C 0 16 r 2 40 0 0 ! 00 00 13 0 0 9 r 940 9 C 14 200 0 18 e ! 15 ! ! s e k a k e l 7 l 00 4 e 90 17 15 0 r ! a 16 9400 0 00 14 C 17 D 6 C r 9 Propose13d Whitehouse Add1i8tions to the 20 ! h e ! k c a W t 8600 8 ! r t ! n x Willow i 7 7 o h 8 n e 2 9200 D 1 F i 0 D 9400 o t 0 0 t Swamp e n n 5 s 9 h Mt. Sneffels Wilderness, 2 00 8 ! 00 w 78 e ! D o o 7 u i W T t 2 ! 1 V c s ! 5 0 Moonshine y e 0 . a ! 0 h 6 60 2 n a 8 9 7 c C March 22, 2018 ! 0 A 0 e w 960 r Park ! g 9600 5 C e ! d 8 r Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre i e e 8 k ! e R ! 5 00 k 6 ! 9 ! 2 ! ! . Lake 9600 0 1 1 40 . and Gunnison 9 A ! Map depicts proLpenooresed boundaries for the Whitehouse ! 1 ! 21 5 ! ! 9 ! ! 8 8 0 ! 0 0 ! 22 9 B 0 6 National Forests Additions to the Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • VGP) Version 2/5/2009
    Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS (VGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), any owner or operator of a vessel being operated in a capacity as a means of transportation who: • Is eligible for permit coverage under Part 1.2; • If required by Part 1.5.1, submits a complete and accurate Notice of Intent (NOI) is authorized to discharge in accordance with the requirements of this permit. General effluent limits for all eligible vessels are given in Part 2. Further vessel class or type specific requirements are given in Part 5 for select vessels and apply in addition to any general effluent limits in Part 2. Specific requirements that apply in individual States and Indian Country Lands are found in Part 6. Definitions of permit-specific terms used in this permit are provided in Appendix A. This permit becomes effective on December 19, 2008 for all jurisdictions except Alaska and Hawaii. This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, December 19, 2013 i Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 William K. Honker, Acting Director Robert W. Varney, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1 6 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, Barbara A.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating Natural Visibility Conditions Under the Regional Haze Rule EPA-454/B-03-005 September 2003
    Guidance for Estimating Natural Visibility Conditions Under the Regional Haze Rule EPA-454/B-03-005 September 2003 Guidance for Estimating Natural Visibility Conditions Under the Regional Haze Program Contract No. 68-D-02-0261 Work Order No. 1-06 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Emissions, Monitoring and Analysis Division Air Quality Trends Analysis Group Research Triangle Park, NC DISCLAIMER This report is a work prepared for the United States Government by Battelle. In no event shall either the United States Government or Battelle have any responsibility or liability for any consequences of any use, misuse, inability to use, or reliance upon the information contained herein, nor does either warrant or otherwise represent in any way the accuracy, adequacy, efficacy, or applicability of the contents hereof. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Environmental Protection Agency wishes to acknowledge the assistance and input provided by the following advisors in the preparation of this guidance document: Rodger Ames, National Park Service, Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere (CIRA); Shao-Hang Chu, USEPA; Rich Damberg, USEPA; Tammy Eagan, Florida Dept. of Environmental Protection; Neil Frank, USEPA; Eric Ginsburg, USEPA; Dennis Haddow, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Ann Hess, Colorado State University; Hari Iyer, Dept. of Statistics, Colorado State University; Mike Koerber, Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium; Bill Leenhouts, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; William Malm, National Park Service (CIRA); Debbie Miller, National Park Service; Tom Moore , Western Regional Air Partnership; Janice Peterson, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; Marc Pitchford, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Air Resources Laboratory; Rich Poirot, State of Vermont, Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Hills Corporation Announces Acquisition of Cheyenne Light, Fuel & Power and Approval of Holding Company Application
    NEWS RELEASE Black Hills Corporation Announces Acquisition of Cheyenne Light, Fuel & Power and Approval of Holding Company Application 1/21/2005 RAPID CITY, S.D., Jan. 21 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Black Hills Corporation (NYSE: BKH) today announced the completion of its acquisition and the assumption of operational responsibility of Cheyenne Light, Fuel & Power Company (CLF&P). Black Hills Corporation purchased all the common stock of CLF&P, including the assumption of outstanding debt of approximately $25 million, for approximately $90 million, plus a working capital adjustment to be nalized in the second quarter of 2005. CLF&P was purchased from Xcel Energy Inc. (NYSE: XEL). Cheyenne Light, Fuel & Power serves approximately 38,000 electric and 31,000 natural gas customers in Cheyenne and other parts of Laramie County Wyoming. Its electric system peak load is 163 megawatts (MW), and power is supplied to the utility under an all-requirements contract with Public Service Company of Colorado, a subsidiary of Xcel Energy. The all-requirements contract expires in 2007. Annual gas distribution and transportation is approximately 5,000,000 MMBtu (million British thermal units). David R. Emery, President and Chief Executive Ocer of Black Hills Corporation, said, "We welcome this opportunity to serve our new customers in and around Cheyenne and to deliver reliable, value-priced energy. This acquisition increases the scope of our Wyoming-based energy endeavors, which includes power generation, wholesale and retail power delivery, coal mining and oil and natural gas production. We are very pleased with this acquisition and believe it increases our potential to expand our regional presence in the future." REGISTERED HOLDING COMPANY APPLICATION APPROVED The Company also announced that its application for nancing and investment authority in connection with its registration as a holding company under the Public Utilities Holding Company Act of 1935 was recently approved by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Range of Variability and Current Landscape Condition Analysis: South Central Highlands Section, Southwestern Colorado & Northwestern New Mexico
    Historical Range of Variability and Current Landscape Condition Analysis: South Central Highlands Section, Southwestern Colorado & Northwestern New Mexico William H. Romme, M. Lisa Floyd, David Hanna with contributions by Elisabeth J. Bartlett, Michele Crist, Dan Green, Henri D. Grissino-Mayer, J. Page Lindsey, Kevin McGarigal, & Jeffery S.Redders Produced by the Colorado Forest Restoration Institute at Colorado State University, and Region 2 of the U.S. Forest Service May 12, 2009 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY … p 5 AUTHORS’ AFFILIATIONS … p 16 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS … p 16 CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION A. Objectives and Organization of This Report … p 17 B. Overview of Physical Geography and Vegetation … p 19 C. Climate Variability in Space and Time … p 21 1. Geographic Patterns in Climate 2. Long-Term Variability in Climate D. Reference Conditions: Concept and Application … p 25 1. Historical Range of Variability (HRV) Concept 2. The Reference Period for this Analysis 3. Human Residents and Influences during the Reference Period E. Overview of Integrated Ecosystem Management … p 30 F. Literature Cited … p 34 CHAPTER II. PONDEROSA PINE FORESTS A. Vegetation Structure and Composition … p 39 B. Reference Conditions … p 40 1. Reference Period Fire Regimes 2. Other agents of disturbance 3. Pre-1870 stand structures C. Legacies of Euro-American Settlement and Current Conditions … p 67 1. Logging (“High-Grading”) in the Late 1800s and Early 1900s 2. Excessive Livestock Grazing in the Late 1800s and Early 1900s 3. Fire Exclusion Since the Late 1800s 4. Interactions: Logging, Grazing, Fire, Climate, and the Forests of Today D. Summary … p 83 E. Literature Cited … p 84 CHAPTER III.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 – Complexes: Area-Specific Management Recommendations
    Wild Connections Conservation Plan for the Pike & San Isabel National Forests Chapter 5 – Complexes: Area-Specific Management Recommendations This section contains our detailed, area-specific proposal utilizing the theme based approach to land management. As an organizational tool, this proposal divides the Pike-San Isabel National Forest into eleven separate Complexes, based on geo-physical characteristics of the land such as mountain ranges, parklands, or canyon systems. Each complex narrative provides details and justifications for our management recommendations for specific areas. In order to emphasize the larger landscape and connectivity of these lands with the ecoregion, commentary on relationships to adjacent non-Forest lands are also included. Evaluations of ecological value across public and private lands are used throughout this chapter. The Colorado Natural Heritage Programs rates the biodiversity of Potential Conservation Areas (PCAs) as General Biodiversity, Moderate, High, Very High, and Outranking Significance. The Nature Conservancy assesses the conservation value of its Conservation Blueprint areas as Low, Moderately Low, Moderate, Moderately High and High. The Southern Rockies Ecosystem Project's Wildlands Network Vision recommends land use designations of Core Wilderness, Core Agency, Low and Moderate Compatible Use, and Wildlife Linkages. Detailed explanations are available from the respective organizations. Complexes – Summary List by Watershed Table 5.1: Summary of WCCP Complexes Watershed Complex Ranger District
    [Show full text]