DOCSLIB.ORG

2017 Colorado Sheep & Goat

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

C OLORADO PARKS & WILDLIFE 2017 Colorado Sheep & Goat APPLICATION DEADLINE: APRIL 4 online brochure cpw.state.co.us 2017 Colorado Sheep & Goat Hunting Online Features Watch more Colorado Parks and Wildlife videos on our VIMEO & YOUTUBE VIDEO CHANNELS VIDEOS: WHAT’S NEW: 2017 BIG GAME GET UPDATED on the new, general regulatory changes to the 2017 Sheep & Goat and Big Game brochures. See this brochure for species- and unit- specific changes. THE FUTURE OF CONSERVATION LEARN HOW your license dollars contribute directly to the conservation of wildlife species and outdoor recreation in Colorado. HUNTER PINK GET INFORMED about the new hunter pink cloth- ing alternative to fluorescent orange. There’s a link MORE ONLINE to the fact sheet in the video too! QUIZ AND RESOURCES: MOUNTAIN GOAT IDENTIFICATION HUNTING COLORADO’S If you are hunting mountain goats, it is difficult — but extremely impor- tant — that you identify female goats properly. Read the CPW online PUBLIC LANDS guide and take the quiz to ensure you know your target and avoid fines once you are hunting in the field. CLICK TO TAKE THE QUIZ HEAR THE DETAILS about big game, small game Rocky Mountain Bighorn Sheep and waterfowl hunting on Colorado’s public lands, © Wayne Lewis, CPW 2 including State Wildlife Areas, State Trust Lands and State Parks. 2017 Colorado Sheep & Goat Hunting 2017 Colorado Sheep & Goat Hunting TABLE OF CONTENTS 2017 What’s New ...................................................1 CPW OFFICE LOCATIONS cpw.state.co.us License Fees & Information ................................. 1 ADMINISTRATION Watch more Colorado Parks and Wildlife videos on our VIMEO & YOUTUBE VIDEO CHANNELS • Fees and surcharges 1313 Sherman St., #618 • Hunter education requirements Denver, 80203 303-297-1192 In the Field & Special License Information .......... 2 • RFW, BSAP and special management licenses ONLY the offices below can assist hunters with animal checks and taking samples that are related to hunting activities. See the CPW website for a complete list of our parks locations • TIPs program details that can also sell licenses, issue duplicate licenses and accept licenses for refunds. • Forest Service road closures; using pack goats • Evidence of sex; attaching carcass tags BRUSH (closed until further notice) GRAND JUNCTION MONTE VISTA 122 E. Edison 711 Independent Ave. 0722 S. Road 1 E. • Regulations for transporting and donating meat Brush, 80723 Grand Junction, 81505 Monte Vista, 81144 970-842-6300 970-255-6100 719-587-6900 Identification, Mandatory Checks ....................... 3 • Bighorn sheep and mountain goat identification tips COLORADO SPRINGS GUNNISON MONTROSE • Legal hunting hours; sunrise/sunset table 4255 Sinton Road 300 W. New York Ave. 2300 S. Townsend Ave. Colorado Springs, 80907 Gunnison, 81230 Mont rose, 81401 • Mandatory checks and reporting for sheep, goat 719-227-5200 970-641-7060 970-252-6000 • Hunter orientations • Land closures DENVER HOT SULPHUR SPRINGS PUEBLO 6060 Broadway 346 Grand County Rd. 362 600 Reservoir Road License & Hunting Requirements.....................4–5 Denver, 80216 Hot Sulphur Springs, 80451 Pueblo, 81005 303-291-7227 970-725-6200 719-561-5300 • License and residency requirements .........................................4 LAMAR • Auction and raffle licenses ...........................................................4 DURANGO SALIDA 151 E. 16th St. 2500 S. Main St. 7405 Hwy. 50 • Hunting rules and illegal activities ............................................5 Durango, 81301 Lamar, 81052 Salida, 81201 • Legal hunting methods ................................................................5 970-247-0855 719-336-6600 719-530-5520 Applications .......................................................... 6 FORT COLLINS MEEKER STEAMBOAT SPRINGS 925 Weiss Dr. • Where to submit your application 317 W. Prospect Road 73485 Hwy. 64 Meeker, 81641 Steamboat Springs, 80487 • How to get refunds Fort Collins, 80526 970-472-4300 970-878-6090 970-870-2197 • Using preference points • How to apply as a group GLENWOOD SPRINGS 0088 Wildlife Way Bighorn Sheep ...................................................7–9 Glenwood Springs, 81601 • Hunt code tables ...................................................................... 7–9 970-947-2920 • MAP: Bighorn sheep units ...........................................................9 GET THE BROCHURE ONLINE: cpw.state.co.us/sh/brochure Mountain Goats .............................................10–11 • Hunt code tables .........................................................................10 • MAP: Mountain goat units ......................................................11 Printed for free distribution by GMU Descriptions ......................................... 12–13 Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) Important Dates ................................... back cover 6060 Broadway, Denver, CO 80216 303-297-1192 cpw.state.co.us COVER: ▶ Surrounded by about 20 Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep at Editor: Chelsea Harlan Waterton Canyon while on a walk with his dad, Trevor got a shot of one of the males as the herd finished drinking from the river Cover photo © Trevor Bennion and began to reascend the canyon slopes. Printed Jan. 2017 by Publication Printers, Denver. 85,000 copies. © Trevor Bennion Printing paid for with hunting and fishing license fees. OTHER PHOTOS, LEFT TO RIGHT: GIVE US YOUR BEST SHOT Colorado Parks and Wildlife Director: Robert Broscheid ▶ Jerry Hanson with his billy from We’re looking for fishing photos! Email us pictures of you casting a line or the G4 Mt. Evans area. © Jeff Barber with your catch for a chance to be featured The Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission members are (as of November 2016): in one of our brochures or online: [email protected] James Pribyl, Chair • John Howard, Jr., Vice Chair • Michelle Zimmerman, Secretary • ▶ Blake Fenimore on his second Robert W. Bray • Chris Castilian • Jeanne Horne • Bill Kane • Dale Pizel • bighorn sheep hunt with his dad, James Vigil • Dean Wingfield • Alex Zipp • Don Brown, ex-officio member • Cal Fenimore, in the S41 Peru Creek region. © Cal Fenimore Bob Randall, ex-officio member • Robert Broscheid, CPW Director ▶ Kacee Harris (a Huntmaster in CPW’s Hunter Outreach Program) CPW receives federal financial assistance from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. In accordance with her mountain goat from the G7 Grays Peak area, taken while on a hunt with her dad, Dan Harris. © Dan Harris with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and Title ▶ Juan Cerda in the S39 Mt. Silverheels region with his bighorn IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, the U.S. Department of the Interior and its bureaus ram, taken with his late son Juan Jr.’s rifle. © Carlos Cerda prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability or sex. ▶ Mike Miller waited 11 years for his chance to draw a tag and NOTE: Laws and regulations in this brochure are paraphrased for easier understanding and are take this mountain goat right below Mt. Eolus in the Wemi- intended only as a guide. Complete Colorado wildlife statutes and regulations are available at nuche Wilderness. © Mike Miller CPW offices listed above and online: cpw.state.co.us/Regulations 3 2017 Colorado Sheep & Goat Hunting LICENSE FEES HABITAT STAMPS FEE » 2017 Habitat Stamp (required) ........................................................... $10 2017 Only one is required per person ages 18–64 per year buying or applying for a license. WHAT’S NEW » Lifetime Habitat Stamp ................................................................................... $300.25 » CPW LICENSING SYSTEM CHANGES... or pink, although all hunters may wish CPW is in the process of transitioning to to consider wearing it if concerned about LICENSES FEE an upgraded licensing, pass, registration visibility to other hunters. Read the fact RESIDENTS and reservation system in 2017/18. All sheet at cpw.state.co.us/thingstodo/ customers will need to have an individ- Pages/Hunt.aspx. » Rocky Mountain Bighorn ................................................................. $254 ual email address and password to apply » Mountain Goat ..................................................................................... $254 for or purchase CPW products with the » SEVERAL HUNTING UNITS NOW » Desert Bighorn ...................................................................................... $254 new system; make sure your contact COMBINED... Hunters in units S12, S30 information and email are correct now and S60 can now hunt in an additional NONRESIDENTS (must use paper applications to apply) when you apply for your license. CPW unit. See hunt code tables on pages 7 and is also in the process of going paper- 8 for valid units and season dates. » Rocky Mountain Bighorn/fishing combo................................... $2,149 less for hunting license applications in » Mountain Goat/fishing combo ........................................................ $2,149 2018. The final year for paper hunting » ARCHERY SEASON DATES FOR » Desert Bighorn/fishing combo ...................................................... $1,434 UNIT S57 CHANGED... license applications is 2017. Find more The dates for Nonresident annual fishing licenses are good through March 31, 2018. information on our website soon: cpw. the bighorn ram season in S57 have been state.co.us/CPWshop moved from
Recommended publications
  • Aerial Survey Highlights for Colorado 2014

    Aerial Survey Highlights for Colorado 2014

    Aerial Survey Highlights for Colorado 2014 Aerial detection surveys of tree killing or damaging insects and diseases are conducted annually over Colorado’s forest lands. This is a cooperative effort between the US Forest Service and the Colorado State Forest Service. In 2014, 28 million acres were surveyed by 7 trained federal and state surveyors. Highlights of the survey by damage agent are reported below. In 2014, all reported agents are insects that kill and/or defoliate trees. This report includes only forest damage that is visible from the air. Spruce Beetle • Since 1996, spruce beetle has affected approximately 1,397,000 acres to varying degrees in Colorado. • Spruce beetle activity was detected on 485,000 acres in Colorado in 2014. Of these, 253,000 acres are in areas not previously mapped as having spruce beetle activity (new acres). This epidemic continues to expand rapidly (Figures 1, 2). In some areas, the outbreak has moved through entire drainages in the course of one year. In the most heavily impacted drainages, nearly every mature spruce has been killed (Figure 3). • The spruce beetle epidemic is expanding most rapidly in southern Colorado’s Forests and impacts many thousands of acres. Areas affected are found from the La Garita Wilderness Area to north of Cottonwood Pass, the Sangre de Cristo and Wet Mountains, as well as south to the Colorado border and into New Mexico. Aerial survey in south central Colorado showed spruce beetle epidemics expanded on the San Juan (26,000 new acres on 53,000 active acres), Rio Grande (78,000 new acres on 192,000 active acres), Gunnison (54,000 new acres on 79,000 active acres), and San Isabel (26,000 new acres on 31,000 active acres) National Forests.
  • Estimating Natural Visibility Conditions Under the Regional Haze Rule EPA-454/B-03-005 September 2003

    Estimating Natural Visibility Conditions Under the Regional Haze Rule EPA-454/B-03-005 September 2003

    Guidance for Estimating Natural Visibility Conditions Under the Regional Haze Rule EPA-454/B-03-005 September 2003 Guidance for Estimating Natural Visibility Conditions Under the Regional Haze Program Contract No. 68-D-02-0261 Work Order No. 1-06 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Emissions, Monitoring and Analysis Division Air Quality Trends Analysis Group Research Triangle Park, NC DISCLAIMER This report is a work prepared for the United States Government by Battelle. In no event shall either the United States Government or Battelle have any responsibility or liability for any consequences of any use, misuse, inability to use, or reliance upon the information contained herein, nor does either warrant or otherwise represent in any way the accuracy, adequacy, efficacy, or applicability of the contents hereof. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Environmental Protection Agency wishes to acknowledge the assistance and input provided by the following advisors in the preparation of this guidance document: Rodger Ames, National Park Service, Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere (CIRA); Shao-Hang Chu, USEPA; Rich Damberg, USEPA; Tammy Eagan, Florida Dept. of Environmental Protection; Neil Frank, USEPA; Eric Ginsburg, USEPA; Dennis Haddow, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Ann Hess, Colorado State University; Hari Iyer, Dept. of Statistics, Colorado State University; Mike Koerber, Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium; Bill Leenhouts, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; William Malm, National Park Service (CIRA); Debbie Miller, National Park Service; Tom Moore , Western Regional Air Partnership; Janice Peterson, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; Marc Pitchford, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Air Resources Laboratory; Rich Poirot, State of Vermont, Dept.
  • Historical Range of Variability and Current Landscape Condition Analysis: South Central Highlands Section, Southwestern Colorado & Northwestern New Mexico

    Historical Range of Variability and Current Landscape Condition Analysis: South Central Highlands Section, Southwestern Colorado & Northwestern New Mexico

    Historical Range of Variability and Current Landscape Condition Analysis: South Central Highlands Section, Southwestern Colorado & Northwestern New Mexico William H. Romme, M. Lisa Floyd, David Hanna with contributions by Elisabeth J. Bartlett, Michele Crist, Dan Green, Henri D. Grissino-Mayer, J. Page Lindsey, Kevin McGarigal, & Jeffery S.Redders Produced by the Colorado Forest Restoration Institute at Colorado State University, and Region 2 of the U.S. Forest Service May 12, 2009 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY … p 5 AUTHORS’ AFFILIATIONS … p 16 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS … p 16 CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION A. Objectives and Organization of This Report … p 17 B. Overview of Physical Geography and Vegetation … p 19 C. Climate Variability in Space and Time … p 21 1. Geographic Patterns in Climate 2. Long-Term Variability in Climate D. Reference Conditions: Concept and Application … p 25 1. Historical Range of Variability (HRV) Concept 2. The Reference Period for this Analysis 3. Human Residents and Influences during the Reference Period E. Overview of Integrated Ecosystem Management … p 30 F. Literature Cited … p 34 CHAPTER II. PONDEROSA PINE FORESTS A. Vegetation Structure and Composition … p 39 B. Reference Conditions … p 40 1. Reference Period Fire Regimes 2. Other agents of disturbance 3. Pre-1870 stand structures C. Legacies of Euro-American Settlement and Current Conditions … p 67 1. Logging (“High-Grading”) in the Late 1800s and Early 1900s 2. Excessive Livestock Grazing in the Late 1800s and Early 1900s 3. Fire Exclusion Since the Late 1800s 4. Interactions: Logging, Grazing, Fire, Climate, and the Forests of Today D. Summary … p 83 E. Literature Cited … p 84 CHAPTER III.
  • A Natural Resource Condition Assessment for Rocky Mountain National Park

    A Natural Resource Condition Assessment for Rocky Mountain National Park

    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center A Natural Resource Condition Assessment for Rocky Mountain National Park Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/WRD/NRR—2010/228 ON THE COVER Rocky Mountain National Park Photograph by: Billy Schweiger A Natural Resource Condition Assessment for Rocky Mountain National Park Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/WRD/NRR—2010/228 David M. Theobald1,2 Jill S. Baron2,3 Peter Newman1 Barry Noon4 John B. Norman III1,2 Ian Leinwand1 Sophia E. Linn1 Richard Sherer4 Katherine E. Williams2,5 Melannie Hartman2 1Department of Human Dimensions of Natural Resources, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1480 2Natural Resource Ecology Lab, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1499 3U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins, CO 80523 4Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1474 5Current address: Department of Biology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071 This report was prepared under Task Order J2380060103 (Cooperative Agreement #H1200040001) July 2010 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientific community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. Natural Resource Reports are the designated medium for disseminating high priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application.
  • COLORADO CONTINENTAL DIVIDE TRAIL COALITION VISIT COLORADO! Day & Overnight Hikes on the Continental Divide Trail

    COLORADO CONTINENTAL DIVIDE TRAIL COALITION VISIT COLORADO! Day & Overnight Hikes on the Continental Divide Trail

    CONTINENTAL DIVIDE NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL DAY & OVERNIGHT HIKES: COLORADO CONTINENTAL DIVIDE TRAIL COALITION VISIT COLORADO! Day & Overnight Hikes on the Continental Divide Trail THE CENTENNIAL STATE The Colorado Rockies are the quintessential CDT experience! The CDT traverses 800 miles of these majestic and challenging peaks dotted with abandoned homesteads and ghost towns, and crosses the ancestral lands of the Ute, Eastern Shoshone, and Cheyenne peoples. The CDT winds through some of Colorado’s most incredible landscapes: the spectacular alpine tundra of the South San Juan, Weminuche, and La Garita Wildernesses where the CDT remains at or above 11,000 feet for nearly 70 miles; remnants of the late 1800’s ghost town of Hancock that served the Alpine Tunnel; the awe-inspiring Collegiate Peaks near Leadville, the highest incorporated city in America; geologic oddities like The Window, Knife Edge, and Devil’s Thumb; the towering 14,270 foot Grays Peak – the highest point on the CDT; Rocky Mountain National Park with its rugged snow-capped skyline; the remote Never Summer Wilderness; and the broad valleys and numerous glacial lakes and cirques of the Mount Zirkel Wilderness. You might also encounter moose, mountain goats, bighorn sheep, marmots, and pika on the CDT in Colorado. In this guide, you’ll find Colorado’s best day and overnight hikes on the CDT, organized south to north. ELEVATION: The average elevation of the CDT in Colorado is 10,978 ft, and all of the hikes listed in this guide begin at elevations above 8,000 ft. Remember to bring plenty of water, sun protection, and extra food, and know that a hike at elevation will likely be more challenging than the same distance hike at sea level.
  • Code of Colorado Regulations

    Code of Colorado Regulations

    DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Division of Wildlife CHAPTER 0 – GENERAL PROVISIONS 2 CCR 406-0 [Editor’s Notes follow the text of the rules at the end of this CCR Document.] ARTICLE I – DEFINITIONS [Eff. 03/02/2009] #000 – The following definitions supplement the statutory definitions found in the Wildlife Act including, but not limited to, those definitions found in section 33-1-102, C.R.S. A. General Definitions Including Manner of Take Definitions 1. "Aggregate" when applied to bag and possession limits, means the total number of species which are covered by such bag and possession limits. Any combination of the species may be possessed up to the total number established as the aggregate bag and possession limits. 2. "Archery" means the use of a hand-held bow. 3. "Bag Limit" means the maximum number of wildlife which may be taken in a single day during an established open season. This includes any wildlife which are consumed or donated during the same day they were legally taken. The terms "bag limit," "daily bag" and "bag" are considered to have the same meaning. 4. "Baiting" means the placing, exposing, depositing, distributing, or scattering of any salt, mineral, grain, or other feed so as to constitute a lure, attraction or enticement for wildlife. 5. "Crossbow" means a bow which is attached at a right angle to a stock with a mechanical mechanism for holding the bow string in a cocked position and fired from the shoulder. 6. “Feral Hog” means any species or hybrid of species from the family Suidae (European boar, Eurasian boar, Russian boar, feral hog) or the family Tayassuidae (Javelina and peccary), which possesses one or more morphological characteristic distinguishing it from domestic swine including, but not limited to, an elongated snout, visible tusks, muscular shoulders with small hams and short loins, coarse hair, or a predominant ridge of hair along its back.
  • Appendix C - Roadless Areas

    Appendix C - Roadless Areas

    Appendix C - Roadless Areas Purpose The purpose of this appendix is to describe roadless areas and the analysis factors used in evaluating individual roadless areas on the Routt National Forest. It includes a description of the physical and biological features, primitive recreation and education opportunities, resources, and present management situation for each area. Background Roadless Area Review and Evaluation In 1970, the Forest Service studied all administratively designated primitive areas and inventoried and reviewed all roadless areas in the National Forest System greater than 5,000 acres. This study was known as the Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (RARE). RARE was halted in 1972 due to legal challenge. RARE identified 711,043 acres of roadless area on the Routt National Forest. In 1977, the Forest Service began another nation-wide Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (RARE II) to identify roadless and undeveloped areas within the National Forest System that were suitable for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System. Twenty nine areas, totalling 566,756 acres, were inventoried on the Routt National Forest (including the Middle Park Ranger District of the Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest). As a result of RARE II, four areas on the forest - Williams Fork, St. Louis Peak, Service Creek, and Davis Peak - were administratively designated as Further Planning Areas (FPA). This further planning area designation meant that more information was needed before the Forest Service would recommend any of these areas to Congress for wilderness designation. In January 1979, the Forest Service issued nationally a Final Environmental Impact Statement documenting a review of 62 million acres of roadless and undeveloped areas within the 191-million-acre National Forest System.
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas

    Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas

    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
  • Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests DRAFT Wilderness Evaluation Report August 2018

    Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests DRAFT Wilderness Evaluation Report August 2018

    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests DRAFT Wilderness Evaluation Report August 2018 Designated in the original Wilderness Act of 1964, the Maroon Bells-Snowmass Wilderness covers more than 183,000 acres spanning the Gunnison and White River National Forests. In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form.
  • Region Forest Number Forest Name Wilderness Name Wild

    Region Forest Number Forest Name Wilderness Name Wild

    WILD FIRE INVASIVE AIR QUALITY EDUCATION OPP FOR REC SITE OUTFITTER ADEQUATE PLAN INFORMATION IM UPWARD IM NEEDS BASELINE FOREST WILD MANAGED TOTAL PLANS PLANTS VALUES PLANS SOLITUDE INVENTORY GUIDE NO OG STANDARDS MANAGEMENT REP DATA ASSESSMNT WORKFORCE IM VOLUNTEERS REGION NUMBER FOREST NAME WILDERNESS NAME ID TO STD? SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE FLAG SCORE SCORE COMPL FLAG COMPL FLAG SCORE USED EFF FLAG 02 02 BIGHORN NATIONAL CLOUD PEAK 080 Y 76 8 10 10 6 4 8 10 N 8 8 Y N 4 N FOREST WILDERNESS 02 03 BLACK HILLS NATIONAL BLACK ELK WILDERNESS 172 Y 84 10 10 4 10 10 10 10 N 8 8 Y N 4 N FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP FOSSIL RIDGE 416 N 59 6 5 2 6 8 8 10 N 6 8 Y N 0 N GUNNISON NATIONAL WILDERNESS FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP LA GARITA WILDERNESS 032 Y 61 6 3 10 4 6 8 8 N 6 6 Y N 4 Y GUNNISON NATIONAL FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP LIZARD HEAD 040 N 47 6 3 2 4 6 4 6 N 6 8 Y N 2 N GUNNISON NATIONAL WILDERNESS FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP MOUNT SNEFFELS 167 N 45 6 5 2 2 6 4 8 N 4 6 Y N 2 N GUNNISON NATIONAL WILDERNESS FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP POWDERHORN 413 Y 62 6 6 2 6 8 10 10 N 6 8 Y N 0 N GUNNISON NATIONAL WILDERNESS FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP RAGGEDS WILDERNESS 170 Y 62 0 6 10 6 6 10 10 N 6 8 Y N 0 N GUNNISON NATIONAL FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP UNCOMPAHGRE 037 N 45 6 5 2 2 6 4 8 N 4 6 Y N 2 N GUNNISON NATIONAL WILDERNESS FOREST 02 04 GRAND MESA UNCOMP WEST ELK WILDERNESS 039 N 56 0 6 10 6 6 4 10 N 6 8 Y N 0 N GUNNISON NATIONAL FOREST 02 06 MEDICINE BOW-ROUTT ENCAMPMENT RIVER 327 N 54 10 6 2 6 6 8 6
  • A MODEL for BIOMASS ASSESSMENT E-023 SUBMITTED BY: Dr

    A MODEL for BIOMASS ASSESSMENT E-023 SUBMITTED BY: Dr

    • A MODEL FOR BIOMASS ASSESSMENT E-023 SUBMITTED BY: Dr. Stephen J. Walsh Associate Professor Dr. George p. Malanson Assistant Professor Dr. John D. Vitek Associate Professor Dr. David R. Butler Assistant Professor Department of Geography Oklahoma State University & in conjunction with USDA/Agricultural Research Service SUBMITTED TO: Dr. Norman N. Durham, Director Water Research Center Oklahoma State University March 14, 1983 Introduction The surface of the earth is a complex system responding to the input of energy, natural and human. Human use of the surface for maximum agricultural efficiency requires knowledge of the interactions of all variables involved in the system. Broad categories of phenomena, including the atmosphere (weather and climate), biosphere (vegetation, fauna, and human activity), hydrosphere (precipitation, runoff, infiltration, fluvial erosion, and evapotranspiration), and the lithosphere (soil, topography, and parent material), can be identified as the major variables in any assessment. Assessment of interactions requires data from various sources. The emergence of remote sensing as a source of data for assessments in the last decade permits the development of more accurate predictive models. Refinements in data acquisition, such as improved resolution, the use of radar, and the correlation of detailed surface observations with satellite overpasses, provide researchers with the capability to assess inter­ relationships and create accurate models. A conceptual model, Figure 1, illustrates the interaction of the Department of Geography/CARS and the USDA/Agricultural Research Service with components of the natural system for the purpose of creating a predictive model for biomass assessment~~CARS, the remote sensing center at Oklahoma State University, plus ARS of the USDA bring different skills to this joint research effort.
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)

    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)

    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.