LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT

PARLIAMENT LIBRARY AND REFERENCE, RESEARCH, DOCUMENTATION AND INFORMATION SERVICE (LARRDIS)

MEMBERS’ REFERENCE SERVICE

REFERENCE NOTE . No. 1/RN/Ref./February/2016

For the use of Members of Parliament Not for Publication

DISPLACEMENT BY DISASTERS

------The reference material is for personal use of the Members in the discharge of their Parliamentary duties, and is not for publication. This Service is not to be quoted as the source of the information as it is based on the sources indicated at the end/in the text. This Service does not accept any responsibility for the accuracy or veracity of the information or views contained in the note/collection. DISPLACEMENT BY DISASTERS

INTRODUCTION Disaster is defined as the “serious disruption of the functioning of a community or a society causing widespread human, material, economic or environmental losses which exceed the ability of the affected community or society to cope using its own resources”. They are the result of a combination of risk factors that can be summarized as the exposure of people and assets to hazards, and their pre-existing vulnerability to them.

Displacement is the forced or obliged movement, evacuation or relocation of individuals or groups of people from their homes or places of habitual residence in order to avoid the threat or impact of a disaster. It refers to situations where people are forced to move by other people and organisations, including local or national authorities, but also when people act of their own will in response to the threats and severe conditions they face1.

Disasters brought on by natural hazards force millions of people to flee their homes each year across all regions of the world. The displacement caused is a global phenomenon, and its growing scale, frequency and complexity pose huge challenges for exposed and vulnerable populations, Governments, Humanitarian and Development Organizations and Disaster Risk Managers2.

THE GLOBAL PICTURE

Latest estimates  More than 19.3 million people were displaced by disasters in 100 countries in 2014.  Since 2008, an average of 26.4 million people have been displaced by disasters each year - equivalent to one person every second.

Displacement by hazard type  17.5 million people were displaced by disasters brought on by weather-related hazards in 2014, and 1.7 million by geophysical hazards.  An average of 22.5 million people have been displaced each year by climate or weather- related disasters in the last seven years - equivalent to 62,000 people every day.

1 Global Estimates 2015 - People Displaced by Disasters, p. 13 2 Global Estimates 2014 - People Displaced by Disasters, p. 7 -2-

 The largest increases in displacement are related to weather and climate-related hazards, and floods in particular.

 Climate change, in tandem with people’s increasing exposure and vulnerability, is expected to magnify this trend, as extreme weather events become more frequent and intense in the coming decades.

Displacement trend from 1970 to 2014  Latest historical models suggest that even after adjusting for population growth, the likelihood of being displaced by a disaster today is 60 per cent higher than it was four decades ago.

 1998 was a peak year for displacement, which correlates with the strongest iteration of El Nino on record. Extreme weather events associated with it included hurricane Mitch, which devastated several countries in Central America.

Displacement by region and country  Asia is home to 60 per cent of the world’s population, but accounted for 87 per cent of the people displaced by disasters worldwide in 2014. 16.7 million people were forced to flee their homes in the region. Eleven of the 20 countries worst affected by displacement over the last seven years are in Asia.

 Europe experienced double its average level of displacement for the past seven years in 2014, with 190,000 people displaced, most of them by Flooding in the Balkans.

 Displacement in Africa was three times lower than average in 2014 in absolute terms, but many African countries experienced high levels relative to their population size. The highest level of displacement in relative terms in 2014 was in Sudan, where rainy season floods displaced 159,000 people.

 In Chile, one of the largest displacements of the year highlighted the benefit of investment in disaster prevention and preparedness. Around 970,000 people fled low- lying coastal areas in response to an 8.2 magnitude offshore earthquake and tsunami warning. Most people were able to return home the following day.

 Developing countries are consistently the worst affected, with almost 175 million people displaced since 2008, accounting for 95 per cent of global total. The figure for 2014 was 17.4 million, or 91 per cent of the global total. -3-

The big three: China, India and the  China, India and the Philippines experienced the highest levels of displacement in absolute terms, both in 2014 and from 2008 to 2014.

 Disasters related to floods, storms, earthquakes and volcanic eruptions in the three countries accounted for 15 of the 20 largest displacements in 2014.

 Multiple and repeated displacements in the same parts of the three countries point to areas of particularly high exposure and vulnerability.

 The Philippines was among the three worst-affected countries in relative and absolute terms, both in 2014 and over the 2008 to 2014 period.

 Large-scale evacuations prompted by two category-three in the Philippines caused the largest displacements worldwide for the second year running in 20143.

INDIAN SCENE The frequency and severity of natural disasters in India are increasing. In 2013-14 alone India witnessed several major natural disasters- floods and landslides in Uttarakhand, drought in Maharashtra, cyclones Phailin and Hudhud in Odisha and Andhra Pradesh, respectively - that affected millions of people and caused an unprecedented scale of financial loss, including the cost of response and recovery. The level of intensity and the degree of loss raise the question regarding the effectiveness/ preparedness of disaster risk management in India. India is among the world's most vulnerable areas to natural hazards, particularly earthquakes, floods, droughts, cyclones, and landslides. The Global Climate Change and Vulnerability Index 2011 ranked India as the second "extreme risk" country in the world after Bangladesh, vulnerable to natural and Climate Change hazards. As per the latest seismic zoning map brought out by the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), about 60% of the country is prone to earthquakes of intensity VII or more on the Medvedev-Sponheuer-Karnik (MSK) scale. Over 8% of India's landmass is susceptible to cyclone hazards and almost 76% of the 7,516 kilometer-long coastline is prone to cyclones and tsunamis. Approximately 68% of the country is drought prone; 12% of the area is susceptible to floods, and approximately 15% of the total area of the country is susceptible to landslides.

3 Op.cit., Global Estimates 2015, pp. 8-9 -4-

Climate-induced hazards are very common in the entire Himalayan region. According to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the incidence of floods in the Himalayan region are expected to increase as a result of a rise in precipitation during the monsoon season and glacial melt, both occurring due to changing climate.

In addition, India's high level of poverty and rapid urban growth further increases the vulnerability of its people to the impact of natural hazards and Climatic Changes. New residents and urban poor living in peri-urban areas and informal settlements concentrated in high-risk zones are particularly vulnerable to natural hazards due to lack of adequate infrastructure, insufficient enforcement of building codes, a near absence of financial and insurance mechanisms that help transfer risk, and limited access to basic and emergency services.

Thus, with urban development unable to keep up with rising demands, the vulnerability of people and infrastructure in cities have a higher degree of defencelessness to natural hazards and effects of climate change. It is estimated that around 200 million city dwellers in India will be exposed to storms and earthquakes by 20504.

People Displaced By Disasters In India India experiences high levels of displacement along its east coast, where communities are exposed to tropical storms from the Bay of Bengal, and in the Ganges, Brahmaputra and Yamuna river basins in the North and North-east of the country.

Northern and eastern India suffered a number of large-scale disasters caused by exceptionally heavy rains and riverine floods in 2014. In September, the worst floods to hit Jammu and Kashmir in 50 years displaced around 812,000 people in urban areas of the state. Across the contested line of control with Pakistan, hundreds of thousands more were displaced in Pakistan occupied Kashmir.

In Assam, the fourth poorest state in the country,41 floods in July were followed by worse flooding in September and October 2014, which also affected the neighbouring State of Meghalaya. Some 367,000 people were displaced. Despite the regular occurrence of floods in

4 Economic and Political Weekly, January 31, 2015, Vol. L No. 5, p. 36 -5- this region, few long-term measures have been put in place to mitigate flooding in the Brahmaputra river basin.

Further south in the State of Odisha, floodwaters engulfed vast areas of the Mahanadi river delta in July 2014 and displaced more than a million people. Mass evacuations from low- lying areas were undertaken. On 12 October 2014, cyclone Hudhud made landfall near the eastern port city of Visakhapatnam in Andhra Pradesh as a category four storm, bringing widespread floods and landslides. It triggered one of the most costly disasters of the year, causing losses of around $11 billion.

Learning from experiences ahead of cyclone Phailin almost exactly a year earlier, the Andhra Pradesh and Odisha State authorities increased their efforts to convince residents of coastal and hill communities that they should evacuate for their own safety ahead of Hudhud. For thousands of people from the hill tribes, this was their first time to ever leave their home areas. The evacuation of around 600,000 people can be credited with helping to minimize fatalities. When a huge storm hit the area 15 years earlier,10000 people were killed State officials put the death toll from Hudhud at 41(see Annexure I for details of displacement in India and neighbouring countries) 5.

ROLE OF THE CENTRAL AND THE STATE GOVERNMENTS The basic responsibility for undertaking rescue, relief and rehabilitation measures in the event of a disaster rests with the State Governments concerned. The Central Government supplements the efforts of the State Governments by providing logistics and financial support in case of severe Natural Disasters. The logistics support includes deployment of aircrafts and boats, specialist team of Armed forces, Central Armed Police Forces and personnel of National Disaster Response Force, arrangements for relief materials and essential commodities including medicinal stores, restoration of critical infrastructure facilities including communication network and such other assistance as may be required by the affected States to meet the situation effectively6.

Given the vulnerability and exposure to disasters, over the past decade India has made major strides in formulating guidelines, procedures, and putting in place systems to address

5 Ibid, pp. 36-37; 40-41 6 India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Annual Report 2014-15, p. 192 -6- such events. The exposure and experience from past disasters (particularly the Odisha super cyclone in 1999, the Gujarat earthquake in 2001, and the tsunami of 2004) have brought disaster management to the forefront of India's development agenda with the enactment of the Disaster Management Act in 2005.

The Government of India has in place an institutional and strategic approach towards disaster management- the Ministry of Home Affairs is the key nodal agency for coordinating hazard relief and mitigation activities in conjunction with the National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA), the State Disaster Management Authorities (SDMAs), the National Institute of Disaster Management (NIDM) for trainings and the National Disaster Response Force (NDRF). The Twelfth Five-Year has outlined the aim of consolidating progress made towards disaster preparedness, prevention and risk mitigation by integrating them into the development process7.

The concerned State Governments undertake relief activities according to the magnitude of the ground situation, in the wake of natural disasters from the State Disaster Response Fund (SDRF) already placed at their disposal in accordance with items and norms approved by the Government of India. When the available resources are inadequate in the State, an additional assistance is extended from the National Disaster Response Fund (NDRF) by following the laid down procedure, which includes an assessment based on the spot field visit of an Inter- Ministerial Central Team. The financial assistance is towards relief and not for compensation of loss as suffered. The details of the losses due to natural disasters reported by the State Governments/ Union Territories during the last one year and current year are at Annexure-II.

The Ministry of Home Affairs does not maintain centrally status of farmers/ affected families whom relief is provided, since execution of relief activities on the ground is the responsibility of the State concerned. As per the scheme of SDRF the State Government is responsible to ensure that money drawn from the SDRF account is actually utilized for the purposes for which the SDRF has been set up and only on item of expenditure and as per norms approved by the GOI. The State Accountant General is required to monitor the expenditure as per the items and norms of assistance. The Comptroller and Auditor General of India conducts audit of SDRF every year. State-wise details of the memoranda submitted to this Ministry and assistance approved from NDRF during the last one year and current year, are

7 Op.cit., EPW, pp. 36-37 -7- given at Annexure-III. The details of allocation and releases from SDRF and NDRF during the last one year and the current year are given at Annexure-IV 8.

GLOBAL POLICY FRAMEWORKS AND PROCESSES OF RELEVANCE FOR DISASTER- RELATED DISPLACEMENT The Sendai Framework on Disaster Risk Reduction 2015 – 2030 acknowledges the large number of disaster displaced persons identified in recent years as one of the devastating effects of disasters. The Framework underlines, inter alia, the need to prepare for “ensuring rapid and effective response to disasters and related displacement, including access to safe shelter, essential food and non food relief supplies” and encourages States to adopt, at national and local levels “policies and programmes addressing disaster induced human mobility to strengthen the resilience of affected people and that of host communities as per national laws and circumstances.” It also calls for “transboundary cooperation to build resilience and reduce disaster risk, including displacement risk.

The Agenda for Sustainable Development also adopted in 2015 contains a commitment “to cooperate internationally to ensure the humane treatment”, inter alia, of “displaced persons,” and to build the resilience of those in vulnerable situations to climate- related extreme events and other disasters.

The first World Humanitarian Summit (WHS) will be held in Istanbul on 23 and 24 May 2016 and will bring together Governments, Humanitarian Organizations, people affected by humanitarian crises and other relevant stakeholders to develop a set of concrete actions aimed at enabling countries and communities to better prepare for crisis and emergencies, including preparing for increased frequency and intensity of Climate Change related natural hazards. It will be important to ensure the inclusion of human mobility challenges into such proposals and promote actions that can protect people from being displaced and ensure movement in dignity and safety when displacement is unavoidable.

The United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development (Habitat III) will take place in Quito, Ecuador, on 17-20 October 2016. The goal of the conference is to secure renewed political commitment for sustainable urban development, assess accomplishments to date, address poverty, and identify and address new and emerging

8 Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 1344 dated 3.3.2015 -8- challenges. The first implementing conference of the Post-2015 sustainable development and climate change agendas, Habitat III offers a unique opportunity to discuss the important challenge of urban areas vulnerability to Climate Change (especially informal settlements) and as destinations for those uprooted by Climate Change effects9.

CONCLUSION As most disasters are as much man-made as they are natural, much more can be done in order to strengthen community-based and national resilience to prevent the worst impacts of natural hazards, and to better prepare for events that cannot be avoided. Policies and practice that protect and respect the rights of displaced people and those at risk of displacement, and that target their specific needs, can play a vital role in mitigating impacts, breaking recurrent patterns and avoiding protracted situations.10 After a detailed exercise, the Ministry of Home Affairs in collaboration with the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), has developed a draft India Disaster Recovery Framework, which also incorporates views/ comments of the States and other stakeholders. A draft executive guidelines for its implementation also has been prepared11.

9 Human Mobility In the Context of Climate Change UNFCCC-Paris COP-21, p.8 10 Op.cit., Global Estimates 2014, p. 7 11 www.ndmindia.nic.in -9-

Annexure-I

Largest Displacement in India and Neighbouring Countries, 2014 Rank Country Event name Affected areas Figure Month Relative Absolute source(s)* estimate** estimate 1. Philippines Manila and Govt: July 29,911 Rammasun (local Southern Luzon NDRRMC name Glenda) island, Bicol region and Eastern Visayas

2. Philippines (local name Govt: December 1,823,200 18,214 Ruby) Landfall in NDRRMC Dolores, Eastern Samar; other locations: Masbate, Sibuyan island, Romblon, Tablas island and Oriental Mindoro in Eastern Samar

3. India Flood Odisha state; Internationa July 1,073,700 847 Jajpur, Cuttack, l NGO: Sambalpur, Oxfam Bhadrak and Keonjhar districts

4. Chile Iquique North Pacific Govt: April 972,500 54,715 earthquake and coastline National tsunami Director of ONEMI

5. India Riverine flood Jammu and Govt: State October 812,000 640 Kashmir; worst authorities affected districts were Srinagar, Anantnag, Baramulla, Pulwama, Ganderbal, Kulgam, Budgam, Rajouri, Poonch and Reasi

6. Pakistan Riverine flood OCHA, NDMA September 3,997 Azad Kashmir, 740,150 Punjab, GilgitBaltistan, Sindh, PKP and Balochistan

7. India Cyclone Hudhud Coastal districts of IAG/Sphere October 639,300 504 Andhra Pradesh India; state- Advisor to Visakhapatnam, the Andhra Vizianagaram and Pradesh East Godavari; government Odisha state - and Odisha Gajapati, Koraput, chief Makangiri and minister Rayagadathe worst affected of eight districts -10-

8. China Typhoon Hainan province, IFRC July 628,000 450 Rammasun Guangdong province and Guangxi Zhung autonomous region, Yunnan province; provinces in southern China, Guizhou province

9. Typhoon Halong Mie prefecture JMA August 570,000 4,488

10. Bangladesh Flood Nilphamari, Govt Augus t 542,000 3,419 Lalmonirhat, Kurigram, Rangpur, Gaibandha, Jamalpur, Sirajganj, Sunamjong and Sylhet districts: Bolha in the south

11. China Storm Provinces of Unspecified May 447,000 320 Guangdong, Guizhou, Hunan and Jiangxi, Chongqing, Sichuan, Yunnan, Fujian and Guangxi

12. China Flood Guizhou, Hunan, Govt: July 403,000 289 Jiangxi, Hubei, Ministry of Sichuan, Yunnan Civil Affairs and Anhui provinces, and Chongqing municipality

13. Philippines Tropical storm Northern Mindanao, Govt: January 400,000 3,996 Lingling (local Davao region, NDRRMC name Agaton) Caraga, ARMM and SOCCSKSARGEN

14. India Flood Assam state - Govt: September 367,000 289 Goalpara, Kamrup Assam and Boko districts; State Meghalaya state - Disaster Tura and Garo Hills Managemen districts t Authority

15. China Flood Nine southern Govt (Media: June 337,000 241 provinces including Xinhua) Hunan, Jiangxi, Guangxi, Sichuan and Fujian

16. China Liaoning, Jiangsu, Govt: July 289,000 207 Zhejiang, Anhui, Ministry of Fujian, Jiangxi, Civil Affairs Shandong and Guangdong provinces 17. China Typhoon Guangdong, Hainan Govt: September 252,000 180 Kalmaegi and Guangxi Ministry of provinces Civil Affairs

18. Malaysia Flood Kelantan (worst hit), Govt: December 247,100 8,185 Johor, Pahang, Unspecified Perak and -11-

Terengganu states

19. China Flood Guizhou, Govt: June 239,000 171 Chongqing, Sichuan, National Guangxi, Hunan, Commission Guangdong and for Disaster Zhijiang provinces Reduction

20. China Ludian Ludian county of Govt: August 169 earthquake Zhaotong city in Ministry of 236,900 Yunnan province Civil Affairs

21. Philippines Tropical storm Northern tip of Govt: September 206,400 2,061 Fung-Wong (local Cagayan province on NDRRMC name Mario) Luzon island; Metro Manila and Bulacan and Rizal provinces

22. Indonesia Flood Bekasi, Cianjur, Govt: BNPB January 196,700 778 Subang, Karawang, West Bandung and Indramayu districts in West Java province

23. Bolivia Flood Beni department IOM January 190,000 17,514 worst affected; floods across the country

24. Indonesia Seasonal flood Batang, Pekalongan Govt: BNPB January 165,900 656 City, Pati, Jepara, Kudus, Pemalang, Demak, Cilacap, Semarang City, Kebumen, Purbalingga, Kendal, Banjarnegara, Brebes, Klaten, Purworejo districts in Central Java province

25. India Flood Assam state - Govt: Assam August 163,000 128 Barpeta, State Bongaigaon, Disaster Dhemaji, Management Dibrugarh, Jorhat, Authority Lakhimpur, Morigaon, Kamrup, Nagaon, Nalbari, Tinsukia, Sivasagar, Sonitpur, Golaghat, Udalguri and Goalpara districts

26. Sudan Rainy season Khartoum, Kassala, IFRC: August 159,000 4,102 flood Gezira, Northern, Sudanese Sennar, North Red Kordufan, South Crescent Kordofan, River Nile, West Darfur and White Nile states

-12-

27. China Cyclone Fung Zhejiang province Govt: September 158,000 113 Wong and Shanghai Unspecified

28. Philippines Tropical storm Central and Govt: December 1,555 Jangmi (local southern provinces NDRRMC 155,700 name Seniang)

29. India Flood Bihar state Govt: August 130,000 102 Disaster management authorities

30. China Flood Wuxi County in Govt: August 121,700 87 Chongqing province, Ministry of Sichuan and Civil Affairs Guizhou provinces

31. Sri Lanka Monsoon flood North and north-east UN, DMC, December 120,000 5,595 central regions OCHA

32. India Flood Nalanda (worst Bihar state August 116,100 91 affected), Saharsa, Bihar Inter- Supaul, West agency Champaran, Group Madhubani, Darbhanga, Muzaffarpur, Sitamarhi, Patna, Sheohar, Araria, Sheikhpura, Khagaria and Gopalganj districts in

* Text in parentheses indicates the original source cited by the publisher of the information. Only the source(s) selected for the final event estimate are shown. The estimate for most events, especially those of larger scale, drew on multiple sources that were cross-checked before selecting the one that appeared to be the most comprehensive and reliable figure for the total incidence of displacement.

** Figures rounded to the nearest 100

Source: Global Estimates 2015- People Displaced by Disasters

-13-

Annexure-II

State-wise details of damage due to Cyclonic storms/ heavy rains/ floods/ landslides/ earthquake etc. during the years 2013-14 and 2014-15 Year 2013-14 2014-15 (as on 31.12.14) Crops lives Cattle Crops Sl. lives lost Cattle Houses area (in lost lost Houses area (in No. State (No.) lost (No.) (No.) lakh ha.) (No.) (No.) (No.) lakh ha.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 Andhra Pr. 60 2517 59639 13.12 61 4777 40379 3.30 2 Arunachal Pr. 52 401 2316 2.20 61 1992 2742 0.28 3 Assam ------0.013 90 8961 138000 3.67 4 Bihar 231 6458 156986 4.00 144 28 5621 1.16 5 Chhattisgarh ------27 199 6053 0.004 6 Gujarat 186 274 407 -- 27 112 875 -- 7 Goa -- -- 139 0.04 -- -- 41 -- 8 Haryana ------9 Himachal Pr. 52 23648 5633 0.53 45 698 1963 0.136 10 J & K 30 74 72574 -- 304 61326 253184 6.48 11 Jharkhand ------12 Karnataka 86 286 11061 2.27 27 85 19125 0.91 13 Kerala 182 1366 10672 0.11 132 527 8292 0.20 14 Madhya Pr. 390 1166 22816 9.25 ------15 Maharashtra 365 2164 147369 7.49 151 53 44 -- 16 Manipur ------17 Meghalaya ------66 8822 10701 0.159 18 Mizoram ------19 Nagaland -- 2680 982 0.08 17 2860 14537 0.31 20 Odisha 59 5688 474250 11.00 50 672 83140 3.65 21 Punjab 41 954 9774 4.00 31 127 24795 1.06 22 Rajasthan ------23 Sikkim ------24 Tamil Nadu ------75 341 3750 -- 25 Tripura ------21 -- 1139 0.015 26 Uttar Pradesh 380 519 54994 7.97 132 107 75564 5.00 27 Uttarakhand 3547 9470 10625 0.36 66 348 1824 0.013 28 West Bengal 183 45285 169296 1.31 169 145 33621 0.508 29 Puducherry 01 48 694 0.003 ------Total 5845 102998 1210227 63.74 1696 92180 725390 26.855

Source: Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 1344 dated 3.3.2015 -14-

Annexure-III Status of memoranda received from the State Governments seeking additional Central assistance from National Disaster Response Fund (NDRF) during 2013-14 and 2014-15.

Sl. State Type of disasters Assistance Status of assistance from NDRF No. projected by the State 1 2 3 6 I-Memoranda received during 2013-14

1 J & K Earthquake 1st May 609.33 Rs. 42.74 crore from NDRF subject to the 2013 adjustment of 75% of the balance available in the SDRF account for instant disaster.

2 Uttarakhand- Cloudburst/ flash 1533.48 Rs. 1187.87 crore from NDRF subject to the Floods/ landslides adjustment of 90% of the balance available in 2013 the SDRF account for instant disaster.

3 Kerala Flood/ landslide – 504.14 Rs. 94.47 crore (Rs. 90.76 cr. on 24-10-2013 + Rs. 13 3.71 cr. on 16-01-2014) from NDRF subject to the adjustment of 75% of the balance available in the SDRF account for instant disaster. 4 Himachal Pradesh Avalanches, flash 2101.06  Rs. 240.20 crore (Rs. 95.68 crore on 24-10- Flood/ landslide/ 2013 + Rs. 144.52 crore on 16-01-2014) from cloudburst- 13 NDRF subject to the adjustment of 90% of the balance available in the SDRF account for instant disaster.  Air bills, as per actual, based on the bills received from MoD. 5. Maharashtra Flood – 13 2841.78 Rs. 921.98 crore from NDRF subject to the adjustment of 75% of the balance available in the SDRF account for instant disaster.

6. Karnataka Flood - 13 610.85 Rs. 154.25 crore from NDRF subject to the adjustment of 75% of the balance available in the SDRF account for instant disaster.

7. Odisha Cyclone ‘Phailin’/ 5832.50 Rs. 934.61 crore from NDRF subject to the floods -13 adjustment of 75% of the balance available in the SDRF account for instant disaster.

8. Madhya Pradesh Floods -13 575.19 Rs. 388.75 crore from NDRF subject to the adjustment of 75% of the balance available in the SDRF account for instant disaster.

Air bills, as per actual, based on the bills received from MoD.

9. Uttar Pradesh Floods -13 3210.19 Rs. 230.06 crore from NDRF subject to the adjustment of 75% of the balance available in the SDRF account for instant disaster. 10. Arunachal Pradesh Floods/ landslides - 1368.54 Rs 56.17 crore from NDRF subject to the 13 adjustment of 75% of the balance available in the SDRF account for instant disaster. -15-

11. Andhra Pradesh Cyclone ‘Phailin’/ 9370.49 Rs 770.15 crore from NDRF subject to the floods -13 adjustment of 75% of the balance available in the SDRF account for instant disaster.

Distribution of assistance between Telangana Andhra Pr. 312.83 cr. 457.32 cr

12. Andhra Pradesh Cyclone ‘Helen and 383.74 Rs 181.89 crore from NDRF subject to the Leher -13 adjustment of 75% of the balance available in the SDRF account for instant disaster.

Distribution of assistance between Telangana Andhra Pr. 73.88 cr. 108.01 cr

II-Memoranda received during 2014-15

1. Kerala- (1st memo) Flood/ landslide-14 141.65 Rs 38.77 crore from NDRF subject to the adjustment of 75% of the balance available in the SDRF account for instant disaster.

2. Nagaland Flood/ landslide-14 220.88 Rs 20.20 crore from NDRF subject to the adjustment of 90% of the balance available in the SDRF account for instant disaster.

3. Karnataka Flood -14 371.23 Rs 71.37 crore from NDRF subject to the adjustment of 75% of the balance available in the SDRF account for instant disaster.

4. Uttar Pradesh Flood -14 769.07 Report received from IMCT and being placed before the HLC. 5. Arunachal Pr. Flood/ landslide-14 2426.12 Rs 134.22 crore from NDRF subject to the adjustment of 90% of the balance available in the SDRF account for instant disaster.

6. J & K Flood/ landslides - 2926.11 Rs 1602.56 crore from NDRF subject to the 14 adjustment of 90% of the balance available in the SDRF account for instant disaster.

7. Kerala- (2nd memo) Flood/ landslide-14 258.22 Rs 64.46 crore from NDRF subject to the adjustment of 75% of the balance available in the SDRF account for instant disaster.

8. Meghalaya Flood/ landslide-14 930.79 Rs 72.82 crore from NDRF subject to the adjustment of 90% of the balance available in the SDRF account for instant disaster.

9. Andhra Pradesh Cyclone hudhud/ 4861.18 Rs 737.60 crore from NDRF subject to the flood -14 adjustment of 75% of the balance available in the SDRF account for instant disaster. 10 Himachal Pr. Flood/ landslide/ 831.84 Report received from IMCT and being placed cloudburst-14 before the HLC. -16-

11 Odisha Cyclone hudhud/ 776.18 Rs 136.43 crore from NDRF subject to the flood -14 adjustment of 75% of the balance available in the SDRF account for instant disaster.

12 Assam Flood -14 2534.88 Upon receipt of report from IMCT it will be processed for placing before the SC- NEC and thereafter before HLC.

Source: Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 1344 dated 3.3.2015 -17-

Annexure-IV

Statement showing State-wise details of allocation and releases of SDRF and NDRF during the years 2013-14 and 2014-15 (Rs. in crore) Allocation under SDRF Centre's share of SDRF released Released from NDRF Sl. 2013-14 2014-15 2013-14 2014-15 (till date) 2013-14 2014-15 (till No. State date) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 Andhra Pradesh 589.04 367.26 @ 520.89 230.85 763.53 578.03 2 Arunachal Pr. 42.54 44.67 38.29 40.20 140.46 125.96 3 Assam 305.35 320.62 68.77 425.97 # 0.00 0.00 4 Bihar 387.21 406.57 290.41 152.465 0.00 0.00 5 Chhattisgarh 175.17 183.93 128.25 # 134.665 0.00 0.00 6 Goa 3.43 3.60 3.735 # 2.635 0.00 0.00 7 Gujarat 581.27 610.33 435.95 228.875 0.00 0.00 8 Haryana 223.31 234.48 235.46 # 255.41 # 0.00 0.00 9 Himachal Pradesh 151.38 158.95 136.24 143.06 95.84 1.419 10 J & K 199.64 209.62 423.93 # 278.50 # 0.00 43.53 11 Jharkhand 300.34 315.36 225.26 236.52 0.00 0.00 12 Karnataka 186.33 195.65 139.75 146.74 245.68 205.83 13 Kerala 151.74 159.33 121.51 119.50 61.74 0.00 14 Madhya Pradesh 454.66 477.39 341.00 358.04 502.59 83.13 15 Maharashtra 512.46 538.08 567.375 # 201.78 1269.11 0.00 16 Manipur 8.36 8.78 7.52 3.95 0.00 0.00 17 Meghalaya 16.96 17.81 22.53 # 16.03 0.00 30.56 18 Mizoram 9.90 10.40 13.145 # 4.68 0.00 0.00 19 Nagaland 5.75 6.04 5.18 5.44 36.60 19.43 20 Odisha 453.31 475.98 419.99 276.98 750.00 0.00 21 Punjab 258.06 270.96 193.55 203.22 0.00 0.00 22 Rajasthan 695.33 730.10 521.50 547.58 0.00 0.00 23 Sikkim 26.33 27.65 23.70 24.89 1.018 0.00 24 Tamil Nadu 339.79 356.78 376.19 # 133.795 453.87 0.00 25 Telangana -- 251.23 @ -- 153.90 -- 18.51 26 Tripura 22.35 23.47 29.70 # 21.12 0.00 0.00 27 Uttar Pradesh 446.13 468.44 334.60 351.33 0.00 522.99 28 Uttarakhand 136.22 143.02 145.00 # -- 329.50 216.81 28 West Bengal 352.87 370.51 264.65 277.88 0.00 0.00 Total 7035.23 7387.01 6034.08 4976.00 4649.94 1846.20

* Centre's share of SDRF not released for want of information relating to crediting of earlier released funds, utilisation certificate and annual report. # Including arrears of SDRF for the previous year. @ The allocation of SDRF between Andhra Pradesh and Telangana has been divided in the ratio 60 : 40 for the year 2014-15. Source: Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 1344 dated 3.3.2015