Abbott, Alysia 2003 Effects of Evolutionary Processes on Lithic Raw Material Procurement and Use During the Puebloan Period at Bosson Wash, Zuni, New Mexico

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Abbott, Alysia 2003 Effects of Evolutionary Processes on Lithic Raw Material Procurement and Use During the Puebloan Period at Bosson Wash, Zuni, New Mexico Abbott, Alysia 2003 Effects of evolutionary processes on lithic raw material procurement and use during the Puebloan period at Bosson Wash, Zuni, New Mexico. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of New Mexico. Abbott, David R. 2000 Ceramics and Community Organization among the Hohokam. University of Arizona Press, Tucson. Achim, Douglas V. 1987 A Serpentine Pendant From a Viejo Period Casas Grandes Site. The Artifact 25(1):79-80. Adams, E. Charles 1983 The Architectural Analogue to Hopi Social Organization and Room Use - Implications in Northern Southwest. American Antiquity 48(1):44-61. 1991 The Origin and Development of the Katsina Cult. Uinversity of Arizona Press, Tucson. Adams, E Charles, Miriam T. Stark, and Deborah S. Dosh 1993 Ceramic Distribution and Exchange - Jeddito Yellow Ware and Implications on Social Complexity. Journal of Field Archaeology 20(1):3- 21. Adams, E. C. 1994 The Katsina Cult: A Western Pueblo Perspective. In Kachinas in the Pueblo World, edited by P. Schaafsma, pp. 35-46. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque. 1996 The Pueblo III-Pueblo IV Transition in the Hopi Area, Arizona. In The Prehistoric Pueblo World, A.D. 1150-1350, edited by M. Adler, pp. 48-58. University of Arizona Press, Tucson. 1998 Late Prehistory in the Middle Little Colorado River Area: A Regional Perspective. In Migration and Reorganization: The Pueblo IV Period in the American Southwest, edited by K.A. Spielmann. Arizona State University Anthropological Research Paper 51, Tempe. Adams, E. Charles, Miriam T. Stark and Deborah S. Dosh 1993 Ceramic Distribution and Exchange: Jeddito Yellow Ware and Implications for Social Complexity. Journal of Field Archaeology 20(1). Adams, Richard E. W. 1973 The Collapse of Maya Civilization: A Review of Previous Theories. In The Classic Maya Collapse, edited by T. Patrick Culbert, pp. 21-34. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque. Adams, William Hampton and Sarah Jane Boling 1989 Status and Ceramics for Planters and Slaves on Three Georgia Coastal Plantations. Historical Archaeology 23(1):69. 1989 Artifact Illustration Using Computer Videographs. Historical Archaeology 23(2):113-118. Adamson, D. A. and et al. 1987 Pottery tempered with Sponge from the White Nile, Sudan. African Archaeological Review 5:115-128. Adan-Bayewitz, David and Moshe Wieder 1992 Ceramics from Roman Galilee: A Comparison of several techniques for Fabric Characterization. Journal of Field Archaeology 19(2):189-205. Adler, Michael 1994 Population Aggregation and the Anasazi Social Landscape: A View from the Four Corners. In The Ancient Southwestern Community: Models and Methods for the Study of Prehistoric Social Organization, edited by W. H. Wills and Robert D. Leonard, pp. 85-101. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque. Adler, M. and R.H. Wilshusen 1990 Large-Scale Integrative Facilities in Tribal Societies: Cross-Cultural and Southwestern U.S. Examples. World Archaeology 22(2):133-144. Adler, Michael A. 1989 Ritual Facilities and Social Integration in Nonranked Societies. In The Architecture of Social Integration in Prehistoric Pueblos, edited by William D. Lipe and Michelle Hegmon, pp. 35-52. Crow Canyon Archaeological Center, Cortez, Colorado. 1996 Land Tenure, Archaeology, and the Ancestral Pueblo Social Landscape. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 15:337-371. Adler, M. A. (editor) 1996 The Prehistoric Pueblo World: A.D. 1150-1350. University of Arizona Press, Tucson. Adler, Michael A., Todd Van Pool and Robert D. Leonard 1996 Ancestral Pueblo Population Aggregation and Abandonment in the North American Southwest. Journal of World Prehistory 10(3):375-438. Agrinier, Pierre 1989 Mirador-Plumajillo, Chiapas, y sus Relaciones con Cuatro Sitios del Horizonte Olmeca en Veracruz, Chiapas y la Costa de Guatemala. Arqueología 2:19-36. Ahler, S. A. 1973 Chemical Analysis of Deposits at Rodgers Shelter, Missouri. Plains Anthropologist 18(1):116-131. Ahlrichs, J. L. 1972 The Soil Environment. In Organic Chemicals in the Soil Environment, edited by C. A. I. Goring and J. W. Hamaker, pp. 3-46. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York. Ahlstrom, Richard, Jeffrey Dean, and William Robinson 1991 Evaluating Tree-Ring Interpretations at Walpi Pueblo, Arizona. American Antiquity 56(4):628-644. Ahlstrom, Richard, Jeffrey Dean, and Carla VanWest 1995 Environmental and Chronological Factors in the Mesa Verde - Northern Rio Grande Migration. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 14:125-142. Ahlstrom, Richard V. N. 1985 The interpretation of archaeological tree-ring dates. 1992 Pothunting in Central Arizona: The Perry Mesa Archeological Site Vandalism Study. U. S. D. A. Forest Service, Southwestern Region, Cultural Resources Management Report No. 13, Phoenix. Ahlstrom, Richard V. N. and Heidi Roberts 1995 Prehistory of Perry Mesa: The Short-Lived Settlement of a Mesa- Canyon Complex in Central Arizona, ca. A.D. 1200-1450. Arizona Archaeological Society: Arizona Archaeologist No. 28, Phoenix. Aitken, Barbara 1930 Temperament in Native American Religion. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 60:363-387. Albert, Lois E. 1986 Physical and Cultural Variables Affecting Phosphate Deposition and Preservation at Archaeological Sites. Bulletin of the Oklahoma Anthropological Society 35:13-22. Aldenderfer, Mark 1996 Introduction. In Anthropology, Space and Geographic Information Systems, edited by Mark Aldenderfer and Herbert D. G. Maschner, pp. 3- 18. Spatial Information Series, M. F. Goodchild, P. A. Burrough, R. McDonnell and P. Switzer, general editor. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Aldenderfer, Mark and Herbert D. G. Maschner (editors) 1996 Anthropology, Space and Geographic Information Systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Alef, Kassam and Paolo Nannipieri (editors) 1995 Methods in Applied Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry. Academic Press, London. Allen, J. R. L. 1965 A Review of the Origin and Characteristics of Recent Alluvial Sediments. Sedimentology 5:89-191. Allen, Kathleen M. S. 1996 Iroquoian Landscapes: People, Environments, and the GIS Context. In New Methods, Old Problems: Geographic Information Systems in Modern Archaeological Research, edited by Herbert D. G. Maschner, pp. 198-222. Occasional Paper No. 23, Center for Archaeological Investigations, general editor. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale. Allen, K. M. S., S. W. Green and E. B. W. Zubrow (editors) 1990 Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology. Taylor and Francis, New York. Allen, Susan Heuck 1994 Trojan Grey Ware at Tel Miqne-Ekron. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research (BASOR) 293:39-52. Allison, James A. 2000 Craft specialization and exchange in small-scale societies- A Virgin Anasazi case study. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Arizona State University. Alloway, B. J. 1995 Heavy Metals in Soils. 2nd ed. Blackie Academic & Professional, London. Altieri, M. 1987 Agroecology: The Scientific Basis of Alternative Agriculture. Westview Press, Boulder. Anderson, J. P. E. and K. H. Domsch 1978 A Physiological Method for the Quantitative Measurement of Microbial Biomass in Soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 10:215-221. Anderson, Patricia K 1998 Yula, Yucatan, Mexico: Terminal Classic Maya Ceramic Chronology for the Chichen Itza Area. Ancient Mesoamerica 9(1):151- 166. Anderson, William P. 1990 The Beginnings of Phoenician Pottery: vessel Shape, Style, and Ceramic Technology in the early Phases of the Phoenician Iron Age. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research (BASOR) 279:35- 54. Andrade, Angela 1983 Estudio arqueológico de los antrosoles de Araracuara (Amazonas). Boletín del Museo del Oro, Banco de la República 14:35-40. Andrews, E. Wyllys V. 1988 Ceramic Units from Komschen, Yucatan, Mexico. Ceramica de Cultura Maya et al 15:51-64. Anonymous 1975 Soil Taxonomy: A Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys. Handbook 436. United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC. 1980 Soil as Evidence. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin April, 1975 (Revised May, 1980). 1984 Keys to Soil Taxonomy. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. Anthony, David 1990 Migration in Archaeology: The Baby and the Bathwater. American Anthropologist 92:895-914. Anthony, David 1990. Antoci, P. R. and N. Petraco 1993 A Technique for Comparing Soil Colours in the Forensic Laboratory. Journal of Forensic Sciences 38(2):437-441. Anyon, Roger, T.J. Ferguson, Loretta Jackson, and Lillie Lane 1996 Native American Oral Traditions and Archaeology. Society of American Archaeology Bulletin 14(2). Anyon, Roger, Patricia A. Gilman and Steven A. LeBlanc 1981 A Re-evaluation of the Mimbres-Mogollon Sequence. Kiva 46:253- 277. Anyon, Roger and Steven A. LeBlanc 1980 The Architectural Evolution of Mogollon-Mimbres Communal Structures. Kiva 45:252-277. Aristotle 384 - 322 BC Peri Kosmon. Armillas, Pedro 1969 The Arid Frontier of Mexican Civilization. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, Series II 31(6):697-704. Arnauld, Charlotte M. 1988 Ceramic Units from Southwestern Alta Verapaz, Guatemala. Ceramica de Cultura Maya et al 15:79-83. Arnold, Dean E. 1985 Ceramic Theory and Cultural Process. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 1993 Review of Domestic Ceramic Production and Spatial Organization: A Mexican Case Study in Ethnoarchaeology, by Phillip J. Arnold III. Journal of Latin AMerican Antiquity 4:297-299. Arnold, Dean E., Hector Neff and Ronald L. Bishop 1991 Compositional Analysis and "Sources": of Pottery: An Ethnoarchaeological Approach. AMerican Anthropologist
Recommended publications
  • The Archaeology of Two Lakes in Minnesota
    BLM LIBRARY 88000247 BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT EASTERN STATES OFFICE THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF TWO LAKES IN MINNESOTA by Christina Harrison CULTURAL RESOURCE SERIES NO. 2 Cover drawing by Shelly H. Fischman. Copies of this report may be obtained from the Bureau of Land Management, Eastern States Office, 350 South Pickett Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22304, or National Technical Information Services, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161, (703)487-4650. BLM/ES/PT-85-001-4331 # w*^ •Ml THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF TWO LAKES IN MINNESOTA By Christina Harrison BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT LIBRARY Denver, Colorado 8866624? Richard Brook General Editor 1985 Management Bureau of Land Center BR Denver Federal Denver, CO 80225 FOREWORD This report combines under one cover the results of archaeological investigations conducted along two Minnesota lakes — Birch Lake Reservoir in the north, along which 21-SL-165 [gator, Ms. Christina Harrison and her assistants. The BLM is very appreciative of the excellent work. The excavation program at SL-165 was part of the BLM compliance requirements for approval for public sale of the parcel on which the site is located. By contrast, the investigation of BE-4A, The settlement picture at BE-44 confirms an existing and more clearly elucidated pattern characteristic of late Archaic-early Woodland occupation in this part of Minnesota. Generally, during this time period, groups ^ *._.._ j ~ J -r„i„_j„ j ___j i i± a. «. _ „i in i_i j .. _ j The contractor has outlined several management recommendations to be considered in reducing or alleviating the erosion problems on BE-44.
    [Show full text]
  • The Moki Messenger
    THE MOKI MESSENGER MARCH 2020 SAN JUAN BASIN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY www.sjbas.org Next Meeting – March 11th Our next meeting will be on Wednesday, March 11th, Table of Contents at 7:00 p.m. in the lyceum at the Center of Southwest Page 1 Next meeting – March 11th Studies at Fort Lewis College. After a brief business Page 2 The Next 40 Years! – Volunteering for SJBAS meeting, John Hoffecker will present: “The early Page 2 Come visit our SJBAS Website Upper Paleolithic archaeology of the East European Page 2 Know your SJBAS neighbor – Janice Sheftel Plain.” There will be a pre-meeting social at 6:30. Page 3 Board Meeting Highlights – February 26 Page 4 Traditional Technologies Presentation – March 4 John’s primary research focus is the global dispersal Page 4 Mesa Verde Panel Discussion – March 6 of anatomically modern humans, which began more Page 4 Upcoming PAAC classes than 50,000 years ago in Africa. His specific Page 5 Excavation Opportunity – Champagne Springs geographic focus is Eastern Europe, where he has Page 5 Crow Canyon Travel Seminars 2020 done field and lab research since the late 1980s. Since Page 5 How did the last Neanderthals live? 2001, he has been working at open-air sites on the Page 6 Upcoming Activity and Field Trip Schedule East European Plain, in both Russia and Ukraine, that Page 9 Regional Archaeology News Page 11 Board of Directors Contact List were occupied by modern humans more than 30,000 years ago. In 2012, he began a new field project at Mira, located on the Lower Dnepr River.
    [Show full text]
  • Megaliths and the Early Mezcala Urban Tradition of Mexico
    ICDIGITAL Separata 44-45/5 ALMOGAREN 44-45/2013-2014MM131 ICDIGITAL Eine PDF-Serie des Institutum Canarium herausgegeben von Hans-Joachim Ulbrich Technische Hinweise für den Leser: Die vorliegende Datei ist die digitale Version eines im Jahrbuch "Almogaren" ge- druckten Aufsatzes. Aus technischen Gründen konnte – nur bei Aufsätzen vor 1990 – der originale Zeilenfall nicht beibehalten werden. Das bedeutet, dass Zeilen- nummern hier nicht unbedingt jenen im Original entsprechen. Nach wie vor un- verändert ist jedoch der Text pro Seite, so dass Zitate von Textstellen in der ge- druckten wie in der digitalen Version identisch sind, d.h. gleiche Seitenzahlen (Pa- ginierung) aufweisen. Der im Aufsatzkopf erwähnte Erscheinungsort kann vom Sitz der Gesellschaft abweichen, wenn die Publikation nicht im Selbstverlag er- schienen ist (z.B. Vereinssitz = Hallein, Verlagsort = Graz wie bei Almogaren III). Die deutsche Rechtschreibung wurde – mit Ausnahme von Literaturzitaten – den aktuellen Regeln angepasst. Englischsprachige Keywords wurden zum Teil nach- träglich ergänzt. PDF-Dokumente des IC lassen sich mit dem kostenlosen Adobe Acrobat Reader (Version 7.0 oder höher) lesen. Für den Inhalt der Aufsätze sind allein die Autoren verantwortlich. Dunkelrot gefärbter Text kennzeichnet spätere Einfügungen der Redaktion. Alle Vervielfältigungs- und Medien-Rechte dieses Beitrags liegen beim Institutum Canarium Hauslabgasse 31/6 A-1050 Wien IC-Separatas werden für den privaten bzw. wissenschaftlichen Bereich kostenlos zur Verfügung gestellt. Digitale oder gedruckte Kopien von diesen PDFs herzu- stellen und gegen Gebühr zu verbreiten, ist jedoch strengstens untersagt und be- deutet eine schwerwiegende Verletzung der Urheberrechte. Weitere Informationen und Kontaktmöglichkeiten: institutum-canarium.org almogaren.org Abbildung Titelseite: Original-Umschlag des gedruckten Jahrbuches.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
    [Show full text]
  • David M. Carballo
    David M. Carballo Department of Archaeology, Boston University 675 Commonwealth Ave., Boston, MA 02215 Phone: (617) 358-1660; Fax: (617) 353-6800; Email: [email protected] EDUCATION University of California, Los Angeles, PhD in Anthropology, 2001-2005. University of California, Los Angeles, MA in Anthropology, 1999-2001. Colgate University, Hamilton, NY, BA in Political Science, with honors, 1991-1995. CURRENT APPOINTMENTS Associate Professor, Archaeology, Boston University. Programmatic appointment, Anthropology, Boston University. Programmatic appointment, Latin American Studies Program, Boston University. PRIOR APPOINTMENTS Assistant Professor, Archaeology, Boston University, 2010-2016. Assistant Professor, Anthropology, University of Alabama, 2009 – 2010. Lecturer, Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University, 2008 – 2009. Visiting Assistant Professor, Anthropology, University of West Georgia, 2007 – 2008. Visiting Assistant Professor, Anthropology, University of Oklahoma, 2005 – 2006. FELLOWSHIPS Santander Visiting Scholar, David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies, Harvard University, spring 2017. Junior Fellow, Center for the Humanities, Boston University, 2013-2014. Visiting Fellow, Center for U.S. – Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego, spring 2007. RESEARCH GRANTS National Science Foundation, Senior Research Grant, Archaeology (BCS-1522630), 2015-2018. “Collaborative Research: Origins of Urbanization and State Formation: Investigations at the Plaza of the Columns Complex at Teotihuacan, Mexico” ($77,717). National Science Foundation, Senior Research Grant, Archaeology (BCS-1321247), 2013-2016. “Collaborative Research: Urbanism, Neighborhood Organization, and Domestic Economy at the Tlajinga District, Teotihuacan, Mexico” ($188,238). National Science Foundation, Senior Research Grant, Archaeology (BCS-0941278), 2009-2011. “The Evolution of Community Ritual and Effects of State Expansion in Central Mexico at La Laguna, Tlaxcala” ($81,579). National Geographic Society, Committee for Research and Exploration (CRE-8634-09), 2009-2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoindian to Preclassic Period Faunal Use at Maya Hak Cab Pek Rockshelter in Southern Belize
    University of Mississippi eGrove Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2016 From Turkeys To Tamales: Paleoindian To Preclassic Period Faunal Use At Maya Hak Cab Pek Rockshelter In Southern Belize Stephanie Raye Orsini University of Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Orsini, Stephanie Raye, "From Turkeys To Tamales: Paleoindian To Preclassic Period Faunal Use At Maya Hak Cab Pek Rockshelter In Southern Belize" (2016). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 358. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/etd/358 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FROM TURKEYS TO TAMALES: PALEOINDIAN TO PRECLASSIC PERIOD FAUNAL USE AT MAYA HAK CAB PEK ROCKSHELTER IN SOUTHERN BELIZE A Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Sociology and Anthropology The University of Mississippi by STEPHANIE R. ORSINI May 2016 Copyright © 2016 by Stephanie R. Orsini All rights reserved ABSTRACT Very little is known about Paleoindian and Archaic subsistence strategies of the people of Mesoamerica prior to the development of ceramics. Rockshelters with good preservation and stratigraphic deposits can provide excellent contexts for a comparative faunal analysis though time. In February of 2014, the Bladen Paleoindian and Archaic Project (BPAP), directed by Dr. Keith Prufer, began excavations at the rockshelter Maya Hak Cab Pek (MHCP). The site has evidence for human activities from the Paleoindian period (11,500 BC to 8,000 BC) through the Preclassic Maya period (2,000 BC to AD 250).
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropology 6186 (4930)
    Anthropology 6186/4930 Sec 2A75/ Dr. Susan D. deFrance Spring 2020 1350-B Turlington Hall [email protected] Office hours T and Thurs 2:30-4:00 pm and by appt. The Archaeology of Maritime Adaptations Course Objectives and Goals: This seminar examines human adaptations to maritime and coastal settings using evidence from archaeological, ethnohistoric and ethnographic contexts. Issues to be examined include: 1) DEFINITIONS OF MARITIME ADAPTATIONS 2) CHARACTERISTICS OF MARINE RESOURCES AND HABITATS 3) HISTORY OF INVESTIGATIONS 4) TECHNOLOGY AND ORGANIZATION OF MARITIME PREDATION 5) OWNERSHIP, TERRITORY, AND RESOURCE RIGHTS 6) POPULATION, SETTLEMENT AND SITE SIZE 7) HEALTH AND BIOLOGY OF MARITIME POPULATIONS 8) ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL ORGANIZATION 9) COMPLEXITY OF MARITIME SOCIETIES 10) ETHNOGRAPHY OF MARITIME PEOPLES 11) MODERN ISSUES RELATED TO CONSERVATION, CLIMATE CHANGE, AND SEA LEVEL RISE Populations and cultures exhibiting maritime adaptations, among others, include: Jomon, Pacific Islands, Yagan, Andean Coast, Chumash, Northwest Coast, Eskimo/Aleut, Red Paint Archaic, Calusa, European Mesolithic, Coastal Maya Readings are available on the course elearning/Canvas site. Written Work and Class Presentations: 1) Weekly Assignments: 1-2 page review (critique, evaluation – not summaries) of ALL weekly readings. These are due at the start of class; late papers are not accepted without prior permission. 2) Each session students will be assigned one reading to present in detail (max. 15 minutes). Oral presentations will rotate between students depending on the number of reading assignments per week. All students must be prepared to discuss all the weekly readings at class time. 3) Final Paper (due APRIL 25 AT 4 PM- NO late papers, No incompletes, emergencies excluded) – on an approved topic related to the Archaeology of Maritime Adaptations.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Presentación. 2.Fundamentación
    1 UNIVERSIDAD VERACRUZANA INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES HISTORICO-SOCIALES INTRODUCCION A MESOMERICA Y NUEVOS DESCUBRIMIENTOS PROFR. DR. PEDRO JIMENEZ LARA I.I.H-S 1. Presentación. El presente curso pretende ofrecer una visión de los elementos y períodos culturales que identifican al México Antiguo. Las regiones son: oasisamérica, aridoamérica y mesoamérica Los horizontes que la componen son: arqueolítico, cenolítico inferior, cenolítico superior, protoneolítico, oasisamérica, aridoamérica, mesoamérica y los primeros contactos en el s. XVI: Planteamiento que se hace de esta manera para una mejor comprensión del curso y entender la evolución de los grupos asentados en territorio mexicano. 2.Fundamentación. Las área culturales del México Antiguo no solo se reduce a Mesoamérica como el período de máximo florecimiento que le antecedió a la conquista. En otros tiempos, antes de conocerse esta macroárea cultural, llegaron diversos grupos de cazadores-recolectores nómadas. El proceso evolutivo de estos grupos fue largo y lento, permitiendo avanzar e ir tocando diferentes niveles de desarrollo y los conocimientos necesarios para el cultivo y domesticación de las plantas como uno de los descubrimientos mas importantes durante esta fase que cambio el curso de la historia. Otra de las regiones es la llamada Oasisamérica localizada al sw de E.U. y norte de México, compuesta por grupos sedentarios agrícolas pero con una complejidad similar a la Mesoamericana. El área denominada mesoamérica, espacio donde interactuaron y se desarrollaron diversos grupos culturales, fue la “…sede de la mas alta civilización de la América precolombina. (Niederbeger, 11, 1996), se desarrollo en la mayor parte del territorio mexicano. Mesoamérica, definida así por Kirchhoff en 1943, es punto de referencia no solo para estudiosos del período prehispánico, en el convergen diversos especialistas amparados en diferentes corrientes ideológicas y enfoques: antropólogos, geógrafos prehistoriadores, historiadores, sociólogos, arquitectos, biólogos, sociólogos, por mencionar a algunos.
    [Show full text]
  • NOTICE to AUTHORS Latin American Antiquity Publishes
    NOTICE TO AUTHORS Latin American Antiquity publishes original papers on the archaeology, prehistory, and ethnohis- tory of Latin America, i.e., those countries—primarily Spanish speaking—comprising Mesoamerica, Central America, and South America, together with culturally affiliated adjacent regions. Authors submit manuscripts to the editor for consideration as ARTICLES or REPORTS in English, Spanish, or Portuguese. Authors should submit an original and three copies of their manuscripts (including all figures, tables, references, and notes), along with an abstract in both English and Spanish. Detailed information on policy, style, and technical matters of manuscript preparation is given in the "Editorial Policy, Information for Authors, and Style Guide for American Antiquity and Latin American Antiquity," which appeared in September 1992 (vol. 3, no. 3), and can be read on the World Wide Web at http://www.saa.org/Publica- tions/StyleGuide/styframe.html. For additional information, updates, or clarification, consult the managing editor at the SAA office in Washington, D.C. EXECUTIVE BOARD OF THE SOCIETY FOR AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGY Officers President: WILLIAM LIPE, Department of Anthropology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-4910 President-elect: VINCAS STEPONAITIS, Research Labs of Anthropology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3120 Secretary: KEITH KINTIGH, Department of Anthropology, Arizona State University, Tempe AZ 85287 Secretary-elect: LYNNE SEBASTIAN, State Historic Preservation Division, 228 East Palace Avenue, Santa Fe, NM 87501 Treasurer: ROBERT L. BETTINGER, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Box 500, Davis CA 95617 Board Members-at-Large C. MELVIN AIKENS, Department of Anthropology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403 CATHERINE CAMiERON, Department of Anthropology, University of Colorado, Campus Box 233, Boulder, CO 80309-0233 MARGARET C.
    [Show full text]
  • Bone Flutes and Whistles from Archaeological Sites in Eastern North America
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 12-1976 Bone Flutes and Whistles from Archaeological Sites in Eastern North America Katherine Lee Hall Martin University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Martin, Katherine Lee Hall, "Bone Flutes and Whistles from Archaeological Sites in Eastern North America. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1976. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/1226 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Katherine Lee Hall Martin entitled "Bone Flutes and Whistles from Archaeological Sites in Eastern North America." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. Charles H. Faulkner, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Major C. R. McCollough, Paul W . Parmalee Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Katherine Lee Hall Mar tin entitled "Bone Flutes and Wh istles from Archaeological Sites in Eastern North America." I recormnend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a maj or in Anthropology.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesoamerican Figurines: the Cholula Perspective
    Mesoamerican Figurines: The Cholula Perspective Chantelle Hug University of Calgary BA Archaeology Honours Thesis: Spring 2007 Supervisor: Dr. Geoffrey McCafferty 1 Background Geography The present day city and archaeological site of Cholula is located in the state of Puebla, Mexico. Puebla is situated in the center of the Mesoamerican culture area, making it an important area for exchange and interaction between the north and south, and the east and west (Plunket and Uruñuela 2005:90). There are several areas with which it could have easily interacted, these include; the Basin of Mexico, the Gulf Coast, the Tehuacán Valley and the Mixteca Baja (McCafferty 2000: 342), all important culture areas. It is located a mere 100 km from the site of Teotihuacán (McCafferty 2001: 281). Situated in the Puebla/ Tlaxcala valley, east of the Basin of Mexico, Cholula is located on a fertile alluvial plain (McCafferty 2000A: 342), which would have been ideal for agricultural pursuits. In the past the area would have supported harvests of maguey, chillies, and most importantly beans and maize. The area and its people enjoyed an abundance of water due to the snow-capped mountains surrounding the valley. This in turn allowed for irrigation of crops, even during the dry season (McCafferty 2001: 282). In pre-contact times there appears to have once been a marshy area that may have supported chinampa style agriculture. The marsh would have most likely attracted waterfowl (McCafferty 2000A: 342), that could then have been exploited by the local people. The site was also located on a bed of clay (Bonfil Batalla 1973 cited in McCafferty 2000A:342), which enabled ceramic production and was also used in modern brick production.
    [Show full text]
  • Cocina Mexicana Y Cultura Raíces Gastronómicas Comunes Del Norte De México Y Sur De Los Estados Unidos
    COCINA MEXICANA Y CULTURA RAÍCES GASTRONÓMICAS COMUNES DEL NORTE DE MÉXICO Y SUR DE LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS JOSÉ N. ITURRIAGA www.periodicobuenviaje.com » JOSÉ N. ITURRIAGA COCINA MEXICANA Y CULTURA RAÍCES GASTRONÓMICAS COMUNES DEL NORTE DE MÉXICO Y SUR DE LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS MARCO GEOGRÁFICO José N. Iturriaga es economista e historiador. Este artículo fue La frontera que divide a México de Estados Unidos es en su origen una presentado durante el Primer Congreso sobre Patrimonio convención política, aunque a la postre devino asimismo en frontera cultu- Gastronómico de la Frontera Norte, que se llevó a cabo del 4 al 6 de junio ral. Hasta 1848, el norte de México iba mucho más allá del sur de los actuales de 2006 en Ciudad Juárez, Chihuahua. Estados Unidos. Hay en esas partes de los dos países una realidad geográfica y climática compartida, claramente expresada en el término contemporáneo de Aridoamérica, acuñado como contraste con el de Mesoamérica, una espe- cie de contrapartida meridional. En efecto, aquel concepto alude a una característica común de aridez y conlleva un esquema de biodiversidad similar en toda la región. Se trata de zo- nas desérticas y semidesérticas con flora y fauna muy parecidas. Recordemos de paso que 31% de nuestro territorio nacional es árido y 36% es semiárido, en tanto que sólo 33% es húmedo o subhúmedo. Aquellas especies vegetales y animales que allá existen constituyen los alimentos prístinos de los habitantes de Aridoamérica, por cierto más nume- rosos de lo que podría suponerse pues tratándose de un desierto se presta a equivocación. El desierto que abarca el noroeste de México y el suroeste de Estados Unidos es particularmente rico en biodiversidad e incluso en especies endé- micas, esto es que sólo se reproducen y viven en esa región del planeta y en ninguna otra más.
    [Show full text]