Sponsa Christi Constitution and Instruction 1950

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sponsa Christi Constitution and Instruction 1950 Sponsa Christi Constitution and Instruction 1950 APOSTOLIC CONSTITUTION “SPONSA CHRISTI” and INSTRUCTION of the Sacred Congregation of Religious Copyright by the Daughters of St. Paul 1950 Reformatted for Letter Size soft copy with Links N.B. Original spellings retained as well as bullet and list formats Page !1 of !26 Sponsa Christi Constitution and Instruction 1950 CONTENTS [page numbers adjusted for format] (when viewing file on computer: clicking on contents below or their page number will jump to that page in the text) PAGE APOSTOLIC CONSTITUTION “SPONSA CHRISTI” 3 General Statutes of Nuns 13 INSTRUCTION 19 OF THE SACRED CONGREGATION OF RELIGIOUS I. Major and Minor Cloister for Nuns 19 A. Major Papal Cloister 20 B. Minor Papal Cloister 21 II. Federations of Monasteries of Nuns 22 III. Monastic Labor 26 Page !2 of !26 Sponsa Christi Constitution and Instruction 1950 APOSTOLIC CONSTITUTION “Sponsa Christi” PIUS BISHOP Servant of the Servants of God for a perpetual memorial The Church, the Spouse of Christ, has from the very beginning of her history not only repeatedly manifested by action and inference but also clearly expressed in her authentic teaching the esteem and tender maternal affection which she bears toward Virgins consecrated to God. And no wonder, for Christian Virgins, "the choice portion of the flock of Christ", impelled by charity, disdaining all the distracting preoccupations of the world and conquering the easy but perilous temptation to divide their affections, not only consecrated themselves entirely to Christ as the true Spouse of their souls, but dedicated their whole lives, resplendent with the jewels of all Christian virtues, to the Lord Jesus Christ and to His Church forever. This mystical attachment of Virgins to the service of Christ and their dedication to the Church was, in the earliest Christian times, done spontaneously and by acts rather than words. Afterward, however, when Virgins came to constitute not merely a certain class of persons but a definite state and order recognized by the Church, the profession of virginity began to be made publicly and to become more and more strictly binding. Later still the Church, in accepting the holy vow or resolution of virginity, inviolably consecrated the Virgin to God and to the Church by a solemn rite which is rightly counted among the more beautiful records of the ancient liturgy, and thus clearly set her apart from others who bound themselves to God by merely private bond. The profession of the life of virginity was protected by a watchful and severe discipline and was at the same time nourished and promoted by all the practices of piety and virtue. The early teaching of the Fathers, of the Greeks and other Orientals as well as of the Latins, gives us a faithful and very beautiful picture of the Christian Virgin. With the greatest care and affection the Fathers illustrated and vividly described in their writings all the elements, whether internal or external, which could have any connection with virginal sanctity and perfection. How well the angelic life of Christian Virgins in that first stage of its history corresponded to the exhortations and descriptions of the Fathers, and how lofty were the heroic virtues which adorned it, we know in part from the direct and certain Page !3 of !26 Sponsa Christi Constitution and Instruction 1950 testimony of historical documents and records, and in part we can conjecture and even deduced beyond any doubt from other reliable sources. Especially after peace was granted to the Church, it became the more and more frequent practice, after the example of the Hermits and Cenobites, that the state of virginity consecrated to God should be completed and confirmed by an express and explicit profession of the counsels of poverty and strict obedience. Women making profession of virginity, who through love of solitude and for protection against the very grave dangers which threatened them on all sides in the corrupt Roman society, had already come together in a community life segregated as much as possible from ordinary human contacts, later, when circumstances became favorable, rather quickly followed the example of the great number of Cenobites, and, leaving the eremitical life mostly to men, imitated the cenobitical life, and nearly all of them entered into it. The Church recommended to Virgins in general the common life understood in a rather wide sense, but for a long time did not wish strictly to impose the monastic life even on consecrated Virgins, but rather left them free in the world, though honored as befitted their state. It came about, however, that Virgins liturgically consecrated and living in their own homes or in a common life of a freer sort became more and more rare, until they were in many places no longer recognized in the law of the Church and were as a matter of fact extinct everywhere; they were never generally restored as a legal institution, and later still were even prohibited. Consequently the Church turned her maternal solicitude chiefly upon those Virgins who, choosing the better part, abandoned the world entirely and embraced a life of complete Christian perfection in monasteries, professing strict poverty and full obedience as well as virginity. The Church provided an external safeguard for their profession of the common life by increasingly rigorous laws of cloister. At the same time she so regulated the internal order of their life that in her laws and religious discipline there gradually emerged as a clearly defined type the figure of the Monastic Sister or Nun entirely devoted to the contemplative life under a strict and regular regime. About the beginning of the middle ages, when consecrated Virgins living in the world had entirely disappeared, these Monastic Nuns, who had grown tremendously in number, in fervor and in variety, were regarded as the sole Virgins of earlier times; yet not only as their heirs and successors, but also as the faithful representatives and industrious managers of the continuing heritage, who after having received five talents had gained other five over and above. This origin and dignity of Monastic Nuns, together with their merit and holiness, are proved and vindicated by liturgical records, Page !4 of !26 Sponsa Christi Constitution and Instruction 1950 canonical documents and historical testimonies of every kind, in writing, sculpture and painting. For several centuries up to the close of the middle ages, as clearly appears from the Decretals and from the entire Corpus Iuris Canonici, the state of perfection, which had already been so solemnly approved and so fully recognized that its public nature was more and more evident, had as its sole representatives among women the Monastic Nuns, side by side with the Monks and Canons Regular. After that, though many grave difficulties had to be overcome, first all the Brothers, who were called Mendicants, or Hospitalers, or for the Redemption of Captives, or by some other name, and then about three centuries later also the Clerics who were called Regulars, were included among true religious and regulars along with the Monks and the Canons Regular; while all the Nuns, both those who clung to the old monasticism or to the life of canonesses and those who were received into second Orders of the Mendicant Brothers canonically belonged to one and the same noble and ancient institute and followed the same way of religious life. Hence, up to the time of the first Congregations of women, which arose either in the sixteenth or in the seventeenth century, they only were considered Nuns who in fact and in law professed an acknowledged form of the religious life. And even after the Congregations were tolerated, and in the course of time recognized first in fact and then as a sort of working arrangement by the law, up to the promulgation of the Code of Canon Law, Nuns alone were strictly recognized as true religious and regulars. And if we turn our attention to the inner elements of the monastic life, who can number and weigh the treasures of religious perfection which lay hid in monasteries? How many flowers and fruits of sanctity these enclosed gardens presented to Christ and to the Church! What efficacious prayers, what treasures of devotedness, what benefits of every sort did not the Nuns strive to bring to their Mother the Church for her embellishment, support and strengthening! * * * The strict and well defined figure of the Nun, as it was engraved on the pages of Canon Law and of religious practice, was accepted readily, and in its main outlines faithfully too, by the numberless Orders, Monasteries, Convents which constantly existed in the Church, and was tenaciously retained for several centuries. From this general fidelity and constancy the sacred institution of Nuns acquired a solid consistency which always enabled it to resist innovations of any kind more vigorously than institutes of any other regulars or religious of either sex. Within certain proper limits this is certainly to its credit. Page !5 of !26 Sponsa Christi Constitution and Instruction 1950 This essential unity among Nuns, which we have commended, does not mean that there were not, even from very early times, both as regards practice and interior disciplines, various figures and varieties, with which God, who is wonderful in His Saints, endowed and adorned the Church His Spouse. These variations among Nuns seem to have sprung from variations of the same sort in Orders and religious Institutes of men, to which the Orders of Nuns were in a sense accessory. In fact nearly all the Monks, Canons Regular, and especially Mendicants, sought to establish second Orders which, keeping the general character of institutes of Nuns, yet differed among themselves in much the same way as did the first Orders.
Recommended publications
  • Women and Men Entering Religious Life: the Entrance Class of 2018
    February 2019 Women and Men Entering Religious Life: The Entrance Class of 2018 Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate Georgetown University Washington, DC Women and Men Entering Religious Life: The Entrance Class of 2018 February 2019 Mary L. Gautier, Ph.D. Hellen A. Bandiho, STH, Ed.D. Thu T. Do, LHC, Ph.D. Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 1 Major Findings ................................................................................................................................ 2 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Part I: Characteristics of Responding Institutes and Their Entrants Institutes Reporting New Entrants in 2018 ..................................................................................... 7 Gender ............................................................................................................................................. 8 Age of the Entrance Class of 2018 ................................................................................................. 8 Country of Birth and Age at Entry to United States ....................................................................... 9 Race and Ethnic Background ........................................................................................................ 10 Religious Background ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Institutes - Property and Tax Issues
    The Catholic Lawyer Volume 33 Number 1 Volume 33, Number 1 Article 7 October 2017 Religious Institutes - Property and Tax Issues Sister Cecilia Meighan Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/tcl Part of the Catholic Studies Commons, Property Law and Real Estate Commons, and the Tax Law Commons Recommended Citation Sister Cecilia Meighan (1990) "Religious Institutes - Property and Tax Issues," The Catholic Lawyer: Vol. 33 : No. 1 , Article 7. Available at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/tcl/vol33/iss1/7 This Diocesan Attorneys' Papers is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Catholic Lawyer by an authorized editor of St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RELIGIOUS INSTITUTES- PROPERTY AND TAX ISSUES SISTER CECILIA MEIGHAN, R.S.M. OF WILKES-BARRE, PA. Religious Institutes-Structures Under Canon Law I will be using the terms religious institute, religious order and reli- gious congregation interchangeably. There is a canonical distinction be- tween religious congregation and religious order; the former's members take simple vows, the latter's members take solemn vows, a distinction of importance in regard to the ownership of property which I will elaborate on shortly. Religious institute is the canonical term, religious order is fa- vored in civil law and by the IRS, and religious congregation and religious community are the more popular terms. A religious institute comes into existence when a group of Catholic Christians who choose to live a common life in service to God's people on behalf of the Church receive the Holy See's or a local bishop's approval.
    [Show full text]
  • MISSIONARIES of the POOR to the STATUS of PONTIFICAL RIGHT “THE LORD HEARS the CRY of the POOR” (Ps
    DECEMBER 2014 NEWSLETTER POPE FRANCIS RAISES THE MISSIONARIES OF THE POOR TO THE STATUS OF PONTIFICAL RIGHT “THE LORD HEARS THE CRY OF THE POOR” (Ps. 34) His Holiness, Pope Francis, by formal decree, has approved the Missionaries of the Poor (MOP) as Lay Religious Institute of PONTIFICAL RIGHT on December 8, 2014, feast of the Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary. Institutes of pontifical right are those erected or approved by the Holy See by formal decree. MOP was founded by Very Rev. Fr. Richard Ho Lung in 1981. It is an international monastic order of Brothers, Priests and Sister dedicated to "Joyful Service with Christ on the Cross" to serve the poorest of the poor. It has now grown to over 550 brothers from 13 countries serving the Lord in nine missions around the world. With hearts full of gratitude to God, together with our Blessed Mother Mary, and our Poor, we sing the Magnificat: “My soul proclaims the greatness of the Lord, my spirit exults Very Rev. Fr. Richard Ho Lung, founder of in God my Savior! He has looked upon his servant in her lowliness, with favor on the humble estate of the Missionaries of the Poor. his servant” (Luke 1: 46-48). CONGRATULATIONS TO THE NEW MOP SUPERIOR GENERAL BROTHER AUGUSTO SILOT JR! THE MISSIONARIES of the Poor has elected a new superior general, Brother Augusto Silot Jr., to succeed Father Richard Ho Lung, who founded the institution dedicated to serving the poorest of the poor, and has served at the helm since 1981.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Report on Religious Life
    Catholic News Agency and women who Year-long MAJOR ORDERS TYPES OF RELIGIOUS ORDERS dedicate their lives celebrations AND THEIR CHARISMS to prayer, service The Roman Catholic Church recognizes different types of religious orders: and devotion. Year of Marriage, A religious order or congregation is Many also live as Nov. 2014- distinguished by a charism, or particular • Monastic: Monks or nuns live and work in a monastery; the largest monastic order, part of a commu- Dec. 2015 grace granted by God to the institute’s which dates back to the 6th century, is the Benedictines. nity that follows a founder or the institute itself. Here • Mendicant: Friars or nuns who live from alms and actively participate in apostolic work; specific religious Year of Faith, are just a few religious orders and the Dominicans and Franciscans are two of the most well-known mendicant orders. rule. They can Year of Prayer, congregations with their charisms: • Canons Regular: Priests living in a community and active in a particular parish. include both Oct. 2012- • Clerks Regular: Priests who are also religious men with vows and who actively clergy and laity. Nov. 2013 Order/ participate in apostolic work. Most make public Congregation: Charism: vows of poverty, Year for Priests, obedience and June 2009- Dominicans Preaching and chastity. Priests June 2010 teaching who are religious Benedictines Liturgical are different from Year of St. Paul, prayer and diocesan priests, June 2008- monasticism who do not take June 2009 Missionaries Serving God vows. of Charity among the Religious congregations differ from reli- “poorest of the gious orders mainly in terms of the vows poor” that are taken.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Indiana ) in the Marion Superior Court ) Ss: County of Marion ) Cause No
    Filed: 5/11/2020 7:32 PM Clerk Marion County, Indiana STATE OF INDIANA ) IN THE MARION SUPERIOR COURT ) SS: COUNTY OF MARION ) CAUSE NO. 49D01-1907-PL-27728 JOSHUA PAYNE-ELLIOTT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF ) INDIANAPOLIS, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ARCHDIOCESE’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF RECONSIDERATION OF MOTION TO DISMISS The Archdiocese respectfully submits this motion to offer clarification on the questions of canon law raised by the Court’s May 1 Order (“Order”)—namely, whether Cathedral could have appealed the Archdiocese’s directive, and whether the actions in this case proceeded from the highest ecclesiastical authority. Order 6-7. The Archdiocese recognizes that these questions were not fully explored in the parties’ briefing on the motion to dismiss and that, due to the coronavirus, the Court was unable to address these issues at oral argument. Accordingly, the Archdiocese respectfully asks the Court to reconsider the ruling with the benefit of additional clarity on the key canon-law matters it has identified. Taking the Complaint and exhibits as true, and taking judicial notice of undisputed canon law, the Archbishop’s directive to Cathedral could not be appealed within the Church, and the Archbishop is the “highest ecclesiastical authority”—as the Order uses that term—over Cathedral’s affiliation with the Catholic Church. Should the Court in considering this jurisdictional question under Rule 12(b)(1) wish to consider evidence on how canon law governs the relationships among Cathedral, the Archbishop, and the broader Church, the Archdiocese submits an affidavit from Fr. Joseph L. Newton, an expert in canon law, attached as Exhibit A.
    [Show full text]
  • From the General Curia3 Decree of Establishament of the Province of Saint Vincent De Paul – Spain
    1 From the General Curia3 Decree of Establishament of the Province of Saint Vincent de Paul – Spain The undersigned, Father Tomaž Mavrič, Superior General of the Congregation of the Mission (Padres Paúles), a Society of Apostolic Life and of Pontifical Right, established on January 25th, 1625, with residence at Via dei Capasso, #30, 00164, Rome (Italy). Pope Urban VIII gave pontifical approval on January 12th, 1633 through the publication of the Bull, Salvatoris Nostri. In accord with canon #621 of the Code of Canon Law and article 107.3 of the Constitutions of the Congregation of the Mission and after verifying that the conditions established in the Constitutions for the erection of a new Province within the Congregation have been fulfilled, I, as the legitimate authority responsible for the erection of provinces of the Congregation with the consent of the General Council, DECREE [1] To canonically establish the entity known as the PROVINCE OF SAINT VINCENT DE PAUL – SPAIN, a province of the Congregation of the Mission (Padres Paúles) which will enjoy all the rights, privileges, and faculties and will have the duties and obligations that correspond to provinces and that are in accord with the law that is applicable to our Congregation. [2] To note that the residence of the Province is located in 28039 Madrid (Spain), calle de Serafin Ramírez #5B and its territory extends to the autonomous communities of Andalucía, Asturias, Cantabria, Cataluña, Comunidad Valenciana, Extremadura, Galicia, Islas Baleares and Madrid; to the autonomous cities of Melilla and Ceuta; to the civil provinces of Ávila, Burgos, León, Palencia, Salamanca, Segovia, Valladolid, Zamora, Toledo and Ciudad Real … all in the country of Spain and its mission in the Republic of Honduras.
    [Show full text]
  • Directory of Discipline of The
    25 DIRECTORY OF DISCIPLINE OF THE CANONS REGULAR OF THE NEW JERUSALEM I. INTRODUCTION: 1. The principal end of the Canons Regular of the New Jerusalem is the sanctification of its members through the perfection of charity (Constitutions 1, 10, 24b, 55, 59, 63). This end is achieved through means of community life, liturgical worship according to the particular law of the institute, ascetic discipline and religious vows. 2. The purpose of this Directory of Discipline (DOD) is to establish a pattern in daily personal and community practices which assist members in striving towards that charity which is the common goal of all. For this reason this Directory constitutes a set of particular laws intended to lead members, and the community as a whole, towards the common goal set forth in the Constitutions. 3. A vocation to the Canons Regular of the New Jerusalem is founded in a voluntary self-abandonment to God through the context of its common life. Deliberate disregard of the Rule, Constitutions or Directory of Discipline contradicts the voluntary desire for sanctification expressed by membership. Thus every one incorporated into the CRNJ’s community life is, by his own free choice, bound to obey the whole of the Rule, Constitutions and DOD in a spirit of Christian perfection (cf. Cons., 60, 61). 4. Voluntary disobedience constitutes a breach of charity which effects the life of the community and the member’s place in it. For this reason disobedience is subject to lawful correction for the good of the member and the community as a whole. 5.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Tale of a Nun'
    ‘Tale of a nun’ Vertaald door: L. Housman en L. Simons bron L. Housman en L. Simons (vert.), ‘Tale of a nun’. In: The Pageant 1 (1896), p. 95-116 Zie voor verantwoording: http://www.dbnl.org/tekst/_bea001tale01_01/colofon.php © 2012 dbnl 95 Tale of a nun * SMALL good cometh to me of making rhyme; so there be folk would have me give it up, and no longer harrow my mind therewith. But in virtue of her who hath been both mother and maiden, I have begun the tale of a fair miracle, which God without doubt hath made show in honour of her who fed him with her milk. Now I shall begin and tell the tale of a nun. May God help me to handle it well, and bring it to a good end, even so according to the truth as it was told me by Brother Giselbrecht, an ordained monk of the order of Saint William; he, a dying old man, had found it in his books. The nun of whom I begin my tale was courtly and fine in her bearing; not even nowadays, I am sure, could one find another to be compared to her in manner and way of kooks. That I should praise her body in each part, exposing her beauty, would become me not well; I will tell you, then, what office she used to hold for a long time in the cloister where she wore veil. Custodian she was there, and whether it were day or night, I can tell you she was neither lazy nor slothful.
    [Show full text]
  • What They Wear the Observer | FEBRUARY 2020 | 1 in the Habit
    SPECIAL SECTION FEBRUARY 2020 Inside Poor Clare Colettines ....... 2 Benedictines of Marmion Abbey What .............................. 4 Everyday Wear for Priests ......... 6 Priests’ Vestments ...... 8 Deacons’ Attire .......................... 10 Monsignors’ They Attire .............. 12 Bishops’ Attire ........................... 14 — Text and photos by Amanda Hudson, news editor; design by Sharon Boehlefeld, features editor Wear Learn the names of the everyday and liturgical attire worn by bishops, monsignors, priests, deacons and religious in the Rockford Diocese. And learn what each piece of clothing means in the lives of those who have given themselves to the service of God. What They Wear The Observer | FEBRUARY 2020 | 1 In the Habit Mother Habits Span Centuries Dominica Stein, PCC he wearing n The hood — of habits in humility; religious com- n The belt — purity; munities goes and Tback to the early 300s. n The scapular — The Armenian manual labor. monks founded by For women, a veil Eustatius in 318 was part of the habit, were the first to originating from the have their entire rite of consecrated community virgins as a bride of dress alike. Belt placement Christ. Using a veil was Having “the members an adaptation of the societal practice (dress) the same,” says where married women covered their Mother Dominica Stein, hair when in public. Poor Clare Colettines, “was a Putting on the habit was an symbol of unity. The wearing of outward sign of profession in a the habit was a symbol of leaving religious order. Early on, those the secular life to give oneself to joining an order were clothed in the God.” order’s habit almost immediately.
    [Show full text]
  • Culross Abbey
    Property in Care (PIC) ID: PIC0 20 Designations: Scheduled Monument (SM13334) Taken into State care: 1913 (Guardianship) Last reviewed: 2011 HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT SCOTLAND STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE CULROSS ABBEY We continually revise our Statements of Significance, so they may vary in length, format and level of detail. While every effort is made to keep them up to date, they should not be considered a definitive or final assessment of our properties. Historic Environment Scotland – Scottish Charity No. SC045925 Principal Office: Longmore House, Salisbury Place, Edinburgh EH9 1SH Historic Environment Scotland – Scottish Charity No. SC045925 Principal Office: Longmore House, Salisbury Place, Edinburgh EH9 1SH CULROSS ABBEY SYNOPSIS The monument comprises the ruins of the former Cistercian abbey of St Mary and St Serf at Culross. It was founded in the 13th century by Malcolm, Earl of Fife, as a daughter-house of Kinloss. After the Protestant Reformation (1560), the east end of the monastic church became the parish church of Culross. The structures in care comprise the south wall of the nave, the cloister garth, the surviving southern half of the cloister's west range and the lower parts of the east and south ranges. The 17th-century manse now occupies the NW corner of the cloister, with the garth forming the manse’s garden. The east end of the abbey church is not in state care but continues in use as a parish church. CHARACTER OF THE MONUMENT Historical Overview: 6th century - tradition holds that Culross is the site of an early Christian community headed by St Serf, and of which St Kentigern was a member.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beginning Everything Started from Father Gemelli’S Inspiring Ideas
    The beginning Everything started from father Gemelli’s inspiring ideas. He had the project of founding a Catholic University, the dream of Italian Catholics, to overcome at last the cultural inferiority caused by the Non expedit of the Church. (The Non expedit was a Vatican disposition forbidding the participation of Catholics in politics). The Non expedit (you cannot) had, in fact, a strong influence and caused the detachment of the majority of Catholics from political life. Father Gemelli believed that, to make the University strong and lasting, it was absolutely necessary to have a spiritual institution including people at all levels (professors, assistant professors, technical and financial staff, public relations staff and even door-keepers) supporting its life and activities by all means. He thought of the possibility of a lay consecration to God in the world, with vows taken secretly by lay people. The initial problem was that this type of consecration was considered impossible and unimaginable at that time, as it did not exist in the canon law. He started, however, with the women’s Institute of “the Missionaries of the Kingship of Christ” originated within the Third Order as “a branch of the great and prolific Franciscan tree”. The first twelve “Franciscan Tertiaries of the Social Kingdom of the Sacred Heart” consecrated themselves to the Lord, in the little choir of the church of San Damiano in Assisi, on the nineteenth of November 1919. This was before the foundation of the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart that took place in 1921. These early Missionaries, through their witness of consecrated life in the world, gave a great contribution to the official acknowledgement of this special vocation by the Church.
    [Show full text]
  • Sacred Landscapes and the Early Medieval European Cloister
    Sacred Landscape and the Early Medieval European Cloister. Unity, Paradise, and the Cosmic Mountain Author(s): Mary W. Helms Source: Anthropos, Bd. 97, H. 2. (2002), pp. 435-453 Published by: Anthropos Institute Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40466044 . Accessed: 29/07/2013 13:52 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Anthropos Institute is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Anthropos. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 152.13.249.96 on Mon, 29 Jul 2013 13:52:20 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions § ANTHROPOS 97.2002:435-453 r'jT! _ Sacred Landscape and the Early Medieval European Cloister Unity,Paradise, and theCosmic Mountain Mary W. Helms Abstract. - The architecturalformat of the early medieval Impressiveevidence of the lattermay be found monastery,a widespread feature of the Western European both in the structuralforms and iconograph- landscape,is examinedfrom a cosmologicalperspective which ical details of individual or argues thatthe garden,known as the garth,at the centerof buildings comp- the cloister reconstructedthe firstthree days of creational lexes dedicatedto spiritualpurposes and in dis- paradiseas describedin Genesis and, therefore,constituted the tributionsof a numberof such constructions symboliccenter of the cloistercomplex.
    [Show full text]