TOURISTS Fact Sheet DELIVERABLE

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

TOURISTS Fact Sheet DELIVERABLE TOURISTS Fact Sheet DELIVERABLE 2.4 WP 2: Communication & Organisation Knowledge Centres Published in August 2015 www.velo-citta.eu Bike sharing for tourists Target Group Charateristics and Best Practice Tourists in the VeloCittà cities Tourists who are visiting a city are a large potential market segment for bike sharing schemes. In addition to people who visit for multiple days, we also consider visitors for one day as tourists. Business travellers are also included in this segment. All VeloCittà cities have significant numbers of tourists visiting. Burgos, with a population of around 180.000, receives annually about one million tourists of whom 30% stay overnight in the city. Burgos hosts several World Heritage sites and it brands itself as a whole-family destination as well as a nature destination. There are many sights and hotels in its city centre, close to the BSS docking stations. Research has shown that tourists are often unfamiliar with the bike sharing scheme, but they do have an interest in using the bike more often. Krakow is Poland’s second largest city and welcomes around 9 million tourists per year, of which 77% were foreign tourists in 2012(1). This number is ever increasing. British, Germans, Italians, French and Russians top the list of foreign travellers. The majority of the current BSS docking stations are located in the histo- ric old town. London Lambeth and London Southwark are neighbouring boroughs. Lambeth hosts the London Eye, a popular tourist attraction, as well as many other key London attractions. The famous Tate Modern can be found in Southwark. Of the more than 15 million international tourists that London received in 2007, around 7 million visited the Borough of Lambeth (excluding business travellers). For Southwark the num- bers are similar. Padua is an important tourist destination in northern Italy, profiting from the massive numbers of tourists visiting its neighbouring city Venice. Padua has a population of 210.000 and hosts around 607.00 tourists per year. Many visitors arrive in Padua by train. The historical city centre is a car-free zone and most of the bicycle docking stations are situated in that area. Located in the Southern part of Hungary, Szeged is the third largest city of Hungary with a population of around 163.000. It is known as the “City of Sunshine”, because it has the highest number of sunny days throughout the year. Szeged is the main city in Csongrád County and serves as a commercial and cultural centre of the region. Today’s Szeged is an important university town and a popular tourist attraction. It is famous for its Art Nouveau buildings in the city centre and a number of open-air events in summer. Ap- proximately 206.000 tourists visit every year. What Tourists need Tourists form a significant target group in all VeloCittà cities. To accommodate their needs and achieve a lasting positive image of bike sharing, some basic requirements should be fulfilled. High visibility: Many bike sharing schemes, except the one in London, lack visibility among tourists. Tourists need clearly visible BS stations along the main touristic sights, near the railway station and hotels. They may need to know the rent-a-bike price to compare. The city can increase visibility by including the BSS service in a city visitor’s card, making the service immediately available to tourists Ease of use: The registration should be as simple and straightforward as possible and information about registra- tion should be available in at least English and preferably additional languages based on the main tourist originations. Cooperation with the tourist sector: Cooperation should de sought with hotels and conference centres. Clear and concise information on the BSS should be delivered in information points for tourists or any other institutions that maintain any relations with tourists. Pre-registration by for example hotels or the Tourist Offices should be made available. Safety: Tourists need to perceive the whole system – registration, the bicycles itself and the cycling lanes - as safe. Even though a BS system can be widely known, like in London, if the common perception is that cycling in the tourist destination is dangerous this can completely undermine its usage. Integrated ticket: Unique card or ticket for public transport and shared bicycles offers to tourists a smooth and simple multimodal journey. With the possibility to connect bike sharing with other modes of transport new mobility options are being created. How Bike Sharing Schemes benefit from Tourists The decision to actively involve tourists and to target them as users for the local bike sharing scheme ge- nerates a number of benefits for the scheme itself, for the tourist sector and for the municipality. Visibility & perception: For many cities, tourists come in such large numbers that they are a great potential increase the overall scheme visibility. Their positive experiences with bike sharing can bring added value and be - nefits not only to bike sharing schemes but more in general to cycling mobility. City branding: As cities are competing for tourists and guests, they invest a big effort in presenting their city as modern and innovative. In that context bike sharing can be seen as an environmentally friendly service to support the modernity and individuality of a city. Getting to know the city by bicycle can be promoted more actively as a unique experience. Bike sharing schemes and city marketing should go hand in hand and can open up new areas for visitors. Scheme size & density: New or enlarged stations at main tourist destinations, close to big hotels or close to conference centres contribute directly to the overall scheme size. Turnover: Tourists generally have a high individual willingness-to-pay and can thus contribute considerable additional turnovers to the scheme. Diversification: The target group “tourists” reaches a differentiated public with regard to gender, age, income and cultural belonging. Challenges Tourists bring along Tourists bring not only benefits for the local bike sharing scheme but can also put the scheme to the test. Scheme availability: Long and very frequent rentals at a few “hot-spots” reduce the overall availability of bikes for other users. Redistribution can be logistically complex in a crowded, possibly car-free, city centre. Operating costs: Building BSS-infrastructure in the touristic centre or close to popular sights is often difficult due to monument protection or lack of space. Additionally the overall maintenance costs increase when bikes are heavily used. Low customer loyalty: Tourists are by definition only visiting shortly and therefore do not form a reliable, fixed customer base. Safety: Tourists are not always familiar with cycling, which can offer challenges regarding safety and related infrastructure. First findings about Tourists in VeloCittà In the framework of a comprehensive market segmentation task, tourists and day visitors were surveyed in the VeloCittà sites. The survey provided some interesting findings about their mobility behaviour and revealed some possible strategies to market the local bike sharing scheme to tourists. Krakow Lambeth Southwark Burgos Padova Szeged Sample 77 35 110 100 26 75 Safety In all of the surveyed cities, the large majority of respondents is capable of riding a bicycle. This obviously is an important prerequisite, but not something obvious, as tourists come from all over the world, some- times from countries without any cycling culture. In London Lambeth, Padova and Szeged, 45-60% of the interviewees considers cycling to be a dangerous activity (figure 1), which may considerably hinder the uptake of bike sharing. Targeted campaigns on this topic seem justified here. In Lambeth and Padova, the majority of respondents also think cycling is slow, whereas in the other cities cycling is more generally considered a fast way to move around town. Figure 1: DistaImage of cycling – safe versus dangerous Familiarity with the scheme The London sites stand out with regard to the high knowledge tourists have of the system. On the opposi- te side, in Burgos only 10% of tourists know the system. None of the respondents used it, however, 90% of them are very interested in using the BSS. In Krakow, Padova and Szeged, knowledge of the system is also on the low side. Efforts need to be made to increase this in order to use the full potential that the tou- rist segment offers. In various cities, the website of the scheme is only in the local language which makes registration difficult for foreign tourists. This is a relatively fast and cheap thing to change. Figure 2: Knowledge and usage of the bike sharing scheme Price Even though knowledge about the current pricing is quite low, the willingness to pay is high in most surveyed sites. This is especially the case in Burgos, Szeged and Krakow, where tourists are sometime willing to pay more than the actual price. In Burgos and Szeged, hotels were interviewed as well and they often agreed that costs of the system are fairly low and they could provide the bikes as a service to their customers. The interviewed hotels in Krakow already provide free bikes to their guests. In London it is an opportunity to talk to hotels about sponsoring and pre-registration, as the tourists are enthusiastic of cycling in London. Figure 3: Willingness to pay How to address Tourists in VeloCittà Operators of bike sharing schemes who want to target tourists must consider that two different groups have to be addressed: tourists themselves as users of the scheme and hotels or conference centres are as potential payers. The following actions are recommended: • Make BSS as accessible as possible for tourists; simple language, many languages. Use websites in pre- paration of their visit; offer them info in their hotels, hostels and conference centres.
Recommended publications
  • Agenda ● January 11, 2017
    MCHENRY COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE (PTAC) AGENDA ● JANUARY 11, 2017 Public Meeting Conference Room A 1:30 PM 667 Ware Rd., Woodstock, IL 60098 I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call B. Introductions II. MINUTES APPROVAL A. Public Transportation Advisory Committee (PTAC) - Public Meeting - Nov 9, 2016 1:30 PM III. PUBLIC COMMENT Any members of the public wishing to address the committee may do so at this time. IV. MEMBER COMMENTS Any members of the committee wishing to address the committee may do so at this time. V. SUBCOMMITTEES A. MCRide Subcommittee At the November 9, 2016 PTAC meeting the MCRide Subcommittee was formed. Members of this subcommittee include the municipalities and townships that financial support the MCRide program. Proposed Meeting Dates April 12, 2017 - 3:00pm July 12, 2017 - 3:00pm October 11, 2017 - 3:00pm All MCRide subcommittee meetings will start immediately following PTAC meetings. VI. OLD BUSINESS A. MCRide Program Update B. PTAC Goals for 2017 C. Transportation Network Company Pilot Program VII. NEW BUSINESS A. Restructuring of Local Government Contributions for MCRide B. Bike Share System Feasibility C. People in Need Forum McHenry County Page 1 Updated 1/5/2017 10:00 AM Agenda Public Transportation Advisory Committee January 11, 2017 VIII. ADJOURNMENT A. Next Meeting Date and Location April 12, 2017 - 1:30 pm McHenry County Administration Building Conference Room 667 Ware Road Woodstock, IL 60098 McHenry County Page 2 Updated 1/5/2017 10:00 AM 2.A MCHENRY COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE (PTAC) MINUTES ● NOVEMBER 9, 2016 Public Meeting County Board Conference Room 1:30 PM 667 Ware Rd, Administration Building, Woodstock, IL 60098 I.
    [Show full text]
  • Platform Innovation in Urban Mobility Transitions the Case of Dockless Bike Sharing
    platform innovation in urban mobility transitions the case of dockless bike sharing arnoud van waes colofon Dit proefschrift werd (mede) mogelijk gemaakt met financiële steun van de Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO) als onder- deel van het onderzoeksprogramma Smart Urban Regions of the Future (no. 438-15-160 397). Platform innovation in urban mobility transitions: The case of dockless bike sharing. PhD thesis. Author: Arnoud van Waes Bookdesign & illustrations: Ilse Schrauwers; isontwerp.nl Printing: Gildeprint Enschede; gildeprint.nl ISBN: 9789492303424 © Arnoud van Waes, 2021 All rights reserved. No part of this production may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without prior written permission by the author. Platform innovation in urban mobility transitions The case of dockless bike sharing Platform innovatie in stedelijke mobiliteitstransities Een studie naar innovatieve deelfietssystemen (met een samenvatting in het Nederlands) Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit Utrecht op gezag van de rector magnificus, prof.dr. H.R.B.M. Kummeling, ingevolge het besluit van het college voor promoties in het openbaar te verdedigen op donderdag 27 mei 2021 des ochtends te 10.15 uur door Arnoud Harry Marianne van Waes geboren op 21 oktober 1987 te Terneuzen promotor Prof. dr. R.P.J.M. Raven copromotoren Dr. J.C.M. Farla Dr. A. Nikolaeva manuscriptcommissie Prof. dr. N.M.P. Bocken Prof. dr. M.C.G. te Brömmelstroet Prof. dr. C. Castaldi Prof. dr. ir. Q.C. van Est Prof. dr. A. Meijer 1 content Preface .
    [Show full text]
  • New Generation of Bike-Sharing Systems in China: Lessons for European Cities
    Volume XI • Issue 33 (September 2018) JMFS pp. 25–42 Journal of Management Warsaw School of Economics and Financial Sciences Collegium of Management and Finance Tomasz Bieliński, Agnieszka Ważna Faculty of Economics University of Gdańsk New Generation of Bike-Sharing Systems in China: Lessons for European Cities ABSTRACT Rising mobility of societies and the urban sprawl cause the need to shape passengers’ behaviour accordingly. For urbanised areas, the biggest challenge is to overcome the problem of dominant private cars usage. Bike-sharing systems are considered to be a successful tool for the popularisation of alternative ways of travelling. Recently Chinese companies have developed new solutions to bike-sharing systems that proved to be successful in China and could be implemented in Europe. However, their implementation will be associated with challenges for municipal authorities and companies conducting the business. The aim of the paper is to identify major advantages and challenges resulting from the implementation of the Chinese solutions in Europe or expansion of bike-sharing companies to Europe. The scientific method used in the paper is the case study of the Chinese bike-sharing market with the special focus on market leaders Mobike and Ofo. Despite existing obstacles, it is possible to succeed in introducing the new generation of bike-sharing systems in Europe. As Chinese enterprises have already entered the European market, it is crucial to make policy makers aware of the obstructions. Keywords: sustainable transportation, urban transport, bicycles, public bikes, Ofo, Mobike, envi- ronmentally friendly transport, dockless bikes, passenger transport innovation JEL Classification Codes: R41, R42 26 Tomasz Bieliński, Agnieszka Ważna Introduction Major challenges of the EU transport policy are to a great extent linked with sustainable development.
    [Show full text]
  • Warsaw Nno.O
    Maps Events Restaurants Cafés Nightlife Sightseeing Shopping Hotels Warsaw NNo.o. 882,2, AAugustugust - SSeptembereptember 22014014 The Warsaw Uprising Awe Inspiring - 70 Years On inyourpocket.com ł No. 82 - 5z ȱȱ¢ȱȱȱ ȱȱ¢ȱȱ ȱȱȱȱ ȱ ȱȱĴȱȱ ǯȱȱŝǰȱ£ ȱǯǯǯȱ ǯȱŘŘȱŞŚŞȱŗŘȱŘśǰȱǯȦ¡ȱŘŘȱŞŚŞȱŗśȱşŖ ǯǯǯȱȱ ȱȱȱ ǯ£ǯǯ ǯ ȱ ȱȱȱȱȱǰȱ¢ȱȱ ȱȱ ȱȱȱ ȱȱȱ ȱȱ¢ȱ ȱ ȱ Ěȱȱȱȱ¢ȱ¢ǯ ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ dz Contents Feature Further Afi eld Warsaw Uprising 8 Łódź 106 Arrival & Transport 12 Leisure 108 City Basics 18 Shopping 112 Culture & Events 20 Directory 118 Restaurants 26 Hotels 120 Cafés 57 Maps & Index Street Index 124 Nightlife 58 City Centre Map 125 Sightseeing City Map 126-127 Essential Warsaw 71 Country Map 128 Sightseeing 72 Listings Index 129 Old Town 84 The Royal Route 87 Features Index 130 Palace of Culture and Science 89 Praga 90 Copernicus Science Center 92 Łazienki 94 IN PRINT Wilanów 97 Jewish Warsaw 100 ONLINE Chopin 103 ON YOUR MOBILE PLAC TEATRALNY 3, WARSAW TEL. +48 601 81 82 83 Monument to the Warsaw Uprising Photo by Zbigniew Furman. Courtesy of Warsaw Uprising Museum. [email protected] 4 Warsaw In Your Pocket warsaw.inyourpocket.com Foreword Welcome to Warsaw and the 82nd edition of Warsaw Publisher In Your Pocket! Summer is in full swing and the city is IYP City Guides Sp. z o.o. Sp.k. absolutely sizzling. It’s the perfect time to take advantage ul. Sławkowska 12, 31-014 Kraków the capitals’ many fi ner points - exploring the parks, [email protected] gardens (beer) and breathtaking urban riverwalks (take www.inyourpocket.com a walk on the wild side!).
    [Show full text]
  • Mobility Payment Integration: State-Of-The-Practice Scan
    Mobility Payment Integration: State-of-the-Practice Scan OCTOBER 2019 FTA Report No. 0143 Federal Transit Administration PREPARED BY Ingrid Bartinique and Joshua Hassol Volpe National Transportation Systems Center COVER PHOTO Courtesy of Edwin Adilson Rodriguez, Federal Transit Administration DISCLAIMER This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. Mobility Payment Integration: State-of-the- Practice Scan OCTOBER 2019 FTA Report No. 0143 PREPARED BY Ingrid Bartinique and Joshua Hassol Volpe National Transportation Systems Center 55 Broadway, Kendall Square Cambridge, MA 02142 SPONSORED BY Federal Transit Administration Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 AVAILABLE ONLINE https://www.transit.dot.gov/about/research-innovation FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION i FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION i Metric Conversion Table SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL LENGTH in inches 25.4 millimeters mm ft feet 0.305 meters m yd yards 0.914 meters m mi miles 1.61 kilometers km VOLUME fl oz fluid ounces 29.57 milliliters mL gal gallons 3.785 liter L ft3 cubic feet 0.028 cubic meters m3 yd3 cubic yards 0.765 cubic meters m3 NOTE: volumes greater than 1000 L shall be shown in m3 MASS oz ounces 28.35 grams g lb pounds 0.454 kilograms kg megagrams T short tons (2000 lb) 0.907 Mg (or “t”) (or “metric ton”) TEMPERATURE (exact degrees) o 5 (F-32)/9 o F Fahrenheit Celsius C or (F-32)/1.8 FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION i FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION ii REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No.
    [Show full text]
  • Adopting and Promoting a 100% Renewable Energy Target Vancouver, Canada
    ADOPTING AND PROMOTING A 100% RENEWABLE ENERGY TARGET VANCOUVER, CANADA Reducing heat consumption in buildings is seen as a pivotal first step Vancouver is Canada’s third largest city, with an estimated 631 486 inhabitants within its municipal boundaries (City of Vancouver, 2017a) and more Vancouver has than 2.5 million in the greater metropolitan area (BC Stats, 2016). As a major economic and cultural committed to hub, the City of Vancouver sees approximately 400 000 additional people travel through it each using exclusively day (City of Vancouver, 2015a). renewable The City of Vancouver has adopted strategies and plans to reduce greenhouse gas emissions energy by 2050 and promote renewable energy deployment. Two key documents are the Greenest City 2020 Action Plan adopted in 2011, and the Renewable City Strategy for 2050, launched in 2015 and updated in September 2017 (City of Vancouver, 2017c). In its Greenest City 2020 Action Plan, Vancouver adopted a city-wide GHG emissions reduction target of 33% by 2020 (against 2007 levels). The challenge of promoting 100% renewables, particularly in buildings and transport In 2014, Vancouver sourced 31% of its energy from renewable sources and 69% from fossil fuels. The renewable portion consisted of 25% large hydro, 2% run-of-river hydro, 3% biomass, and less than 1% solar and wind power. On the fossil fuel side, natural gas contributed 45% (primarily for heating buildings) and transportation fuels (gasoline and diesel, but also bio-fuels) accounted for the remaining 24%. In 2015, total energy use was 59.3 million gigajoules (GJ), a 4% reduction from the 62 million GJ in 2007 (City of Vancouver, 2015a).
    [Show full text]
  • Vancouver Bike Share 2018 Member Survey Results
    VANCOUVER BIKE SHARE 2018 MEMBER SURVEY RESULTS Research Project: Understanding a New Bike Share Program in Vancouver Report Prepared for: The City of Vancouver & Mobi by Shaw Go Partners Spring 2019 Dr. Meghan Winters, Lead Investigator Suzanne Therrien, Research Coordinator Jennifer McKeen, Project Coordinator, MPH Student Kate Hosford, Research Assistant Cities, Health, & Active Transportation Research (CHATR) Lab Simon Fraser University Health Sciences With funding from CHIR, the City of Vancouver, Mitacs, and Mobi by Shaw Go Understanding a New Bike Share Program in Vancouver 2018 Mobi Member Survey Results EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Cities, Health, and Active Transportation Research (CHATR) lab conducted online surveys of the Vancouver public bike share (Mobi by Shaw Go) members 5 months (fall 2016), one year (fall 2017), and two years (fall 2018) after the system’s launch. This report focuses on 2018 results, providing select comparisons with 2016 and 2017 results where notable. Description of Respondents All current annual and monthly Mobi by Shaw Go members were invited to participate in the survey in 2018. One third (n=1722) of members completed the survey. Of these, nearly half had signed up that year. Compared to Vancouver census data, respondents were more likely to be male, younger to middle aged; born in Canada; employed; highly educated; and from a higher income household. Most also lived and/or worked 500 meters from a Mobi docking station. Transportation Patterns Walking was the most common mode of transportation for respondents. Overall, 65% belonged to a car share program and 40% did not own a personal bicycle. The proportion of members that thought bicycling was safe (somewhat or very) in Vancouver increased over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibit B Kelowna Bikeshare Systems Pilot Opportunity Background
    Kelowna Bikeshare Systems December 11th, 2017 kelowna.ca CITY OF KELOWNA Kelowna Bikeshare Systems: Background Report TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Options/Discussion: .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Operating Models for Bikeshare: ................................................................................................................... 4 Benefits of Bikeshare: ................................................................................................................................... 6 Governance Models for Bikeshare: ................................................................................................................ 7 Objectives for Bikeshare in Kelowna: ............................................................................................................ 8 Opportunities for Bikeshare in Kelowna: ........................................................................................................... 9 Opportunity for Pilot Testing: ........................................................................................................................... 9 Key Issues for a Bikeshare Pilot ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pioneer Valley Regional Bike Share System Pilot
    Pioneer Valley Regional Bike Share System Pilot Pioneer Valley Regional Bike Share System Pilot April 2016 Alta Planning + Design | Page 0 Pioneer Valley Regional Bike Share System Pilot Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................................................ 2 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 2. Business Models ......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Overview .............................................................................................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Business Model Matrix ................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Proposed Business Model............................................................................................................................................. 7 3. System Costs and Revenues .................................................................................................................................................. 9 3.1 Cost Components ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Readiness for Shared Micromobility: Public Perceptions in Metro Vancouver
    Readiness for Shared Micromobility: Public Perceptions in Metro Vancouver Recommendations from Case Studies Summary Report Prepared for TransLink July 2020 HUB Cycling: With funding from: Gavin Davidson, Lead Planner Tim Davidson, Planner TransLink New Mobility Research Grant Program With support from: Mitacs Cities, Health & Active Transportation Research (CHATR) Lab, Simon Fraser University: Meghan Winters, PhD Sarah Tremblay, MPP Executive Summary This report is complementary to the Readiness for Shared Micromobility Case Studies report and provides recommendations derived from the findings of case studies that were conducted between January and March 2020 by HUB Cycling with the support of the Cities, Health, and Active Transportation Research (CHATR) Lab. HUB Cycling has taken the findings from the case studies and compiled recommendations for the implementation of shared micromobility in Metro Vancouver and the responsible organizations. Shared micromobility (SMM) is a catch-all phrase that is used to describe a growing variety of shared, publicly available, human and electric powered vehicles, the most common of which include bike share (dockless and station-based), electric bicycles and electric scooters. SMM, and shared e-scooters in particular, prior to COVID-19, were booming in cities all around the world, growing from 35 to 84 million trips annually between 2017 and 2018 (NACTO, 2018). HUB Cycling and CHATR Lab examined SMM programs in Vancouver and at University of British Columbia, Calgary, Seattle, Portland, and Washington DC, to inform possible expansion of SMM in Metro Vancouver. Our research considers implications for established transportation systems and the role that SMM might play in supporting economic, social and environmental objectives identified in TransLink’s Regional Transportation Strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Virtual Conference Sponsorship Deck
    2021 NABSA Virtual Conference Sponsorship Packages and Pricing The Future is Shared ABOUT THE CONFERENCE The NABSA Annual Conference is the only conference of its kind globally. The NABSA conference is an international cross- sector convening of all sectors involved in shared micromobility planning and implementation-- host cities, equipment manufacturers, operators, technology providers, consultants, data analytics companies, and other service providers that all contribute to realizing shared micromobility in communities. Sponsorship provides multiple venues and collateral items to connect you to the people you want to know, and who want to know you. Gain exposure to city officials, operators, and private industry professionals, and make your mark in the shared micromobility industry. The Future is Shared ABOUT THE CONFERENCE The NABSA conference is a global stage. The NABSA Conference is the longest-running and only conference of it’s kind globally. Professionals from all over the world attend this must-go event! The 2020 NABSA virtual conference had 400 attendees. The 2018 & 2019 in-person NABSA conferences had between 300-350 bikeshare and shared mobility professionals in attendance - government officials, private industry and non-profit professionals. NABSA’s annual conference is the best way to connect with the leaders, influencers and decision-makers that are driving shared micromobility forward. Attendees include representatives from many cities across North America engaged in shared micromobility, and looking to implement and
    [Show full text]
  • Guideline for Bike Rental Transdanube.Pearls Final Draft
    Transdanube.Pearls - Network for Sustainable Mobility along the Danube http://www.interreg-danube.eu/approved-projects/transdanube-pearls Guideline for bike rental Transdanube.Pearls Final Draft WP/Action 3.1 Author: Inštitút priestorového plánovania Version/Date 3.0, 23.11.2017 Document Revision/Approval Version Date Status Date Status 3.0 23/11/2017 Final draft xx.xx.xxxx final Contacts Coordinator: Bratislava Self-governing Region Sabinovská 16, P.O. Box 106 820 05 Bratislava web: www.region-bsk.sk Author: Inštitút priestorového plánovania Ľubľanská 1 831 02 Bratislava web: http://ipp.szm.com More information about Transdanube.Pearls project are available at www.interreg-danube.eu/approved-projects/transdanube-pearls Page 2 of 41 www.interreg-danube.eu/approved-projects/transdanube-pearls Abbreviations BSS Bike Sharing Scheme ECF European Cyclists´ Federation POI Point of Interest PT Public Transport Page 3 of 41 www.interreg-danube.eu/approved-projects/transdanube-pearls Table of content Contacts ..................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Bike Rental ................................................................................................................................................................ 5 Execuive summary ................................................................................................................................................. 5 1. Best practice examples from across
    [Show full text]