DOCSLIB.ORG

Superpedestrian Is Launching a Shared E Service Called Link

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

6/22/2020 Superpedestrian is launching a shared e-scooter service called Link Superpedestrian is launching a shared e service called Link Sean O'Kane 6/4/2020 Boston-based micromobility startup Superpedestrian is launching a shared electric scooter-sharing service called Link, which is built around the super durable and smart e-scooters the company announced in late 2018. To bolster that effort, Superpedestrian is acquiring “substantially all of the assets” of fellow Boston mobility startup Zagster, in what is https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/superpedestrian-is-launching-a-shared-e-scooter-service-called-link/ar-BB152FKn 1/6 6/22/2020 Superpedestrian is launching a shared e-scooter service called Link the latest in a rash of consolidations in the space brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic. Superpedestrian tells The Verge it specifically bought the “permits, software and other IP, and talent” related to Zagster’s scooter fleet division, which is in line with what the Boston Business Journal first reported last Friday. It appears that whatever is left of Zagster has gone under. Superpedestrian has been trialing Link in the small town of Fort Pierce, Florida for about five months now with Zagster, as TechCrunch first reported. But it’s now about to move forward with a wider launch after taking in $15 million of fresh investment from growth equity investment firm Edison Partners, a new backer, and existing investors Spark Capital and General Catalyst. Link is already operating in Florida and Provo, Utah, and is hiring elsewhere CEO Assaf Biderman tells The Verge Link will soon launch in four cities in the US and in Europe. He declined to name them, but Superpedestrian is hiring operations associates or managers in Columbus, Ohio, and Asbury Park, New Jersey. The Verge has learned that Link has already deployed e-scooters in Provo, Utah, and is also hiring in Salt Lake City. Link has applied to be part of an upcoming expansion to Tacoma, Washington’s shared e- scooter program, and TechCrunch reported that the company has been negotiating with Manhattan, Kansas as well. Superpedestrian was spun out of MIT’s Senseable City Lab in 2009 in an effort to commercialize an e-bike accessory called the Copenhagen Wheel. The startup announced in late 2018 that it https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/superpedestrian-is-launching-a-shared-e-scooter-service-called-link/ar-BB152FKn 2/6 6/22/2020 Superpedestrian is launching a shared e-scooter service called Link was pivoting to making intelligent hardware for the booming shared e-scooter market, and disclosed at the end of 2019 that it had raised another $20 million, bringing its total funding at the time to $64 million. The company had not attempted to run its own service until the end of last year, when it teamed up with Zagster in Florida. Biderman says the Superpedestrian-designed scooters performed really well during that test run. He says they can last for 2,500 rides, well above the average lifetime of other shared e-scooters. Video player from: YouTube (Privacy Policy, Terms) But the crucial component of the Superpedestrian-designed scooters, Biderman says, is the software. The e-scooters use onboard computing power to determine what components will need servicing and when. This helps cut down on the parts and labor costs, Biderman says, but also the overall operating costs. Fewer problems mean Link needs fewer people tending to the e- scooters, as does longer-lasting hardware. By buying Zagster, Biderman says Link can become a vertically integrated e-scooter service that not only is cheaper to operate, but is less of a headache for cities to partner with. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/superpedestrian-is-launching-a-shared-e-scooter-service-called-link/ar-BB152FKn 3/6 6/22/2020 Superpedestrian is launching a shared e-scooter service called Link The Superpedestrian-designed scooters know when something’s about to break Biderman says he started discussions with Zagster about an acquisition not long after they partnered on the Florida project, but that the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the acquisition process — a claim that tracks with what’s been happening with Zagster lately. Zagster was founded in 2007, well ahead of the Birds and Limes of the world, and has operated bike-share and e-scooter fleets in dozens of cities across the United States. The company typically partnered up with local governments, universities, and even shared mobility giants like Zipcar instead of striking out on its own. But like many other transportation companies, Zagster shut down its services in late March as the pandemic spread throughout the United States. “We understand that many of you use Zagster for essential functions like commuting to work or getting to stores for supplies, so this was not an easy decision to make. However, at this time we have decided that it is necessary to prioritize the safety of our maintenance staff and other riders,” the company wrote at the time. Multiple Zagster employees have since left the company, according to their LinkedIn profiles, including founder and former CEO Tim Ericson. (Ericson did not respond to a request for comment.) Zagster also suddenly started winding down the bike- share services it operated around the country last week, accordingto multiple local media reports. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/superpedestrian-is-launching-a-shared-e-scooter-service-called-link/ar-BB152FKn 4/6 6/22/2020 Superpedestrian is launching a shared e-scooter service called Link “The effects of COVID-19 on our communities has been tragic,” Zagster said in an email to the city officials it had been working with. “Sadly, the pandemic has also impacted Zagster’s business, and it is with heavy hearts that we must inform you that Zagster will no longer be providing bike share services in your community. This was a difficult decision but a necessary one, for which we are truly sorry.” Zagster abruptly shut down its bike-share services last week, and some cities aren’t happy Some cities, like Kankakee, Illinois, are not happy with that explanation. “Zagster is [leaving] without any intention to repay the $90,000 the [Kankakee County Convention & Visitors Bureau] had collected from local communities and groups to fund the program for 2020. That in itself is egregious, but there’s more: Zagster intends to retrieve the 50 bikes it previously placed here without settling the debt,” the Kankakee Daily Journal wrote in an editorial. “CVB Director Staci Wilken told the Daily Journal the bikes won’t be returned until the money is repaid, and the organization’s attorney will send a letter to Zagster demanding the repayment.” Zagster could not be reached for comment. The company’s marketing manager lost his job a few weeks ago, according to a LinkedIn post, and attempts to reach more than a dozen other employees and board members went unanswered. The pandemic has triggered a wave of closures and consolidations in the micromobility space. Most notably, Lime recently acquired Uber’s money-losing Jump e-bike and e-scooter business as part of a larger investment round from the ride-hailing giant. Shortly https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/superpedestrian-is-launching-a-shared-e-scooter-service-called-link/ar-BB152FKn 5/6 6/22/2020 Superpedestrian is launching a shared e-scooter service called Link after that deal was announced, Uber scrapped tens of thousands of Jump bikes. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/superpedestrian-is-launching-a-shared-e-scooter-service-called-link/ar-BB152FKn 6/6.
Recommended publications
  • Agenda ● January 11, 2017

    Agenda ● January 11, 2017

    MCHENRY COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE (PTAC) AGENDA ● JANUARY 11, 2017 Public Meeting Conference Room A 1:30 PM 667 Ware Rd., Woodstock, IL 60098 I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call B. Introductions II. MINUTES APPROVAL A. Public Transportation Advisory Committee (PTAC) - Public Meeting - Nov 9, 2016 1:30 PM III. PUBLIC COMMENT Any members of the public wishing to address the committee may do so at this time. IV. MEMBER COMMENTS Any members of the committee wishing to address the committee may do so at this time. V. SUBCOMMITTEES A. MCRide Subcommittee At the November 9, 2016 PTAC meeting the MCRide Subcommittee was formed. Members of this subcommittee include the municipalities and townships that financial support the MCRide program. Proposed Meeting Dates April 12, 2017 - 3:00pm July 12, 2017 - 3:00pm October 11, 2017 - 3:00pm All MCRide subcommittee meetings will start immediately following PTAC meetings. VI. OLD BUSINESS A. MCRide Program Update B. PTAC Goals for 2017 C. Transportation Network Company Pilot Program VII. NEW BUSINESS A. Restructuring of Local Government Contributions for MCRide B. Bike Share System Feasibility C. People in Need Forum McHenry County Page 1 Updated 1/5/2017 10:00 AM Agenda Public Transportation Advisory Committee January 11, 2017 VIII. ADJOURNMENT A. Next Meeting Date and Location April 12, 2017 - 1:30 pm McHenry County Administration Building Conference Room 667 Ware Road Woodstock, IL 60098 McHenry County Page 2 Updated 1/5/2017 10:00 AM 2.A MCHENRY COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE (PTAC) MINUTES ● NOVEMBER 9, 2016 Public Meeting County Board Conference Room 1:30 PM 667 Ware Rd, Administration Building, Woodstock, IL 60098 I.
  • Mobility Payment Integration: State-Of-The-Practice Scan

    Mobility Payment Integration: State-Of-The-Practice Scan

    Mobility Payment Integration: State-of-the-Practice Scan OCTOBER 2019 FTA Report No. 0143 Federal Transit Administration PREPARED BY Ingrid Bartinique and Joshua Hassol Volpe National Transportation Systems Center COVER PHOTO Courtesy of Edwin Adilson Rodriguez, Federal Transit Administration DISCLAIMER This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. Mobility Payment Integration: State-of-the- Practice Scan OCTOBER 2019 FTA Report No. 0143 PREPARED BY Ingrid Bartinique and Joshua Hassol Volpe National Transportation Systems Center 55 Broadway, Kendall Square Cambridge, MA 02142 SPONSORED BY Federal Transit Administration Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 AVAILABLE ONLINE https://www.transit.dot.gov/about/research-innovation FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION i FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION i Metric Conversion Table SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL LENGTH in inches 25.4 millimeters mm ft feet 0.305 meters m yd yards 0.914 meters m mi miles 1.61 kilometers km VOLUME fl oz fluid ounces 29.57 milliliters mL gal gallons 3.785 liter L ft3 cubic feet 0.028 cubic meters m3 yd3 cubic yards 0.765 cubic meters m3 NOTE: volumes greater than 1000 L shall be shown in m3 MASS oz ounces 28.35 grams g lb pounds 0.454 kilograms kg megagrams T short tons (2000 lb) 0.907 Mg (or “t”) (or “metric ton”) TEMPERATURE (exact degrees) o 5 (F-32)/9 o F Fahrenheit Celsius C or (F-32)/1.8 FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION i FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION ii REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No.
  • Pioneer Valley Regional Bike Share System Pilot

    Pioneer Valley Regional Bike Share System Pilot

    Pioneer Valley Regional Bike Share System Pilot Pioneer Valley Regional Bike Share System Pilot April 2016 Alta Planning + Design | Page 0 Pioneer Valley Regional Bike Share System Pilot Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................................................ 2 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 2. Business Models ......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Overview .............................................................................................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Business Model Matrix ................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Proposed Business Model............................................................................................................................................. 7 3. System Costs and Revenues .................................................................................................................................................. 9 3.1 Cost Components ............................................................................................................................................................
  • 2021 Virtual Conference Sponsorship Deck

    2021 Virtual Conference Sponsorship Deck

    2021 NABSA Virtual Conference Sponsorship Packages and Pricing The Future is Shared ABOUT THE CONFERENCE The NABSA Annual Conference is the only conference of its kind globally. The NABSA conference is an international cross- sector convening of all sectors involved in shared micromobility planning and implementation-- host cities, equipment manufacturers, operators, technology providers, consultants, data analytics companies, and other service providers that all contribute to realizing shared micromobility in communities. Sponsorship provides multiple venues and collateral items to connect you to the people you want to know, and who want to know you. Gain exposure to city officials, operators, and private industry professionals, and make your mark in the shared micromobility industry. The Future is Shared ABOUT THE CONFERENCE The NABSA conference is a global stage. The NABSA Conference is the longest-running and only conference of it’s kind globally. Professionals from all over the world attend this must-go event! The 2020 NABSA virtual conference had 400 attendees. The 2018 & 2019 in-person NABSA conferences had between 300-350 bikeshare and shared mobility professionals in attendance - government officials, private industry and non-profit professionals. NABSA’s annual conference is the best way to connect with the leaders, influencers and decision-makers that are driving shared micromobility forward. Attendees include representatives from many cities across North America engaged in shared micromobility, and looking to implement and
  • Bike Share Feasibility Study

    Bike Share Feasibility Study

    Sonoma County Transportation Authority MODE SHIFT PLAN Bike Share Feasibility November 2016 MODE SHIFT PLAN – BIKE SHARE FEASIBILITY Sonoma County Transportation Authority Table of Contents Bike Share Feasibility Study ....................................................................................................... 1 Goals ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 Evaluation of Potential Operating Models ........................................................................................... 2 Market Analysis Indicators ....................................................................................................................... 9 Site Identification ..................................................................................................................................... 32 Recommendations and Next Steps ....................................................................................................... 34 Appendix A: Organizational Models Explained Appendix B: Potential Designated Bike Share Hub Locations Appendix C: Electric Bicycle Share Systems Table of Figures Figure 1 Bike Share Contribution to Mode Shift Goals ..................................................................... 1 Figure 2 Bike Share Equipment by Operational Model ................................................................... 2 Figure 3 Advantages and Challenges of the Dock-Based Systems ...............................................
  • Cleveland Bike Share the Potential and Possibility

    Cleveland Bike Share the Potential and Possibility

    Cleveland Bike Share The Potential and Possibility Spring 2012 Weatherhead School of Management - MBA Practicum in Sustainable Value and Social Entrepreneurship (ORBH 430B) Gabriel Forte, Amogh Garg, Indrajeet Ghatge, David Hanna, Kandy Hricik, MBA Candidates May 2012 Executive Summary The purpose of this report is to gather and summarize information on current United States bike sharing programs including initiation, funding, initial steps, sustainability, long term revenue sources, cost and demand factors, user demographics and the critical success factors. In addition, interviews were conducted with local stakeholders regarding potential work on bike sharing and to gain insight into the general climate regarding the potential for bike sharing programs. A small group meeting was also conducted with local biking advocates to identify potential barriers to success and assist in developing next steps. Summaries of the research, interviews and potential barriers are included within the report. Next Steps 1. Establish position and governance structure to oversee research, planning and align partnerships for Cleveland bike-sharing program While there is considerable interest among local stakeholders and potential grant and sponsorship funding sources, the project requires a formal leader with an appropriately connected governing body such as a recognized agency, existing committee or carefully selected board of directors to provide structure and accountability for moving the project forward. After discussion with the project sponsors, Chris Bongorno of University Circle Inc. and Brad Chase of GreenCityBlueLake (GCBL), and other local stakeholders such as Chris Alvarado, President of Bike Cleveland, and John Mitterholzer of the Gund Foundation, and a review of the evolution of other bike sharing programs, it is our recommendation that ownership of the research and planning should be conducted under the direction of Bike Cleveland, an advocacy organization for the biking community in Cleveland.
  • Developing a Bike-Share Program for Salinas and CSUMB

    Developing a Bike-Share Program for Salinas and CSUMB

    California State University, Monterey Bay Digital Commons @ CSUMB Capstone Projects and Master's Theses Capstone Projects and Master's Theses 12-2016 Developing a Bike-Share Program for Salinas and CSUMB Brittany Whalen California State University, Monterey Bay Ryan Blackman California State University, Monterey Bay Monica Mata California State University, Monterey Bay Madi Hare California State University, Monterey Bay Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/caps_thes_all Recommended Citation Whalen, Brittany; Blackman, Ryan; Mata, Monica; and Hare, Madi, "Developing a Bike-Share Program for Salinas and CSUMB" (2016). Capstone Projects and Master's Theses. 67. https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/caps_thes_all/67 This Capstone Project (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by the Capstone Projects and Master's Theses at Digital Commons @ CSUMB. It has been accepted for inclusion in Capstone Projects and Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ CSUMB. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Brittany Whalen Ryan Blackman Monica Mata Madi Hare Daniel Fernandez, PhD. ENSTU 471 Fall 2016 Developing a Bike-Share Program for Salinas and CSUMB Introduction Bike-share programs are alternate forms of transportation most commonly found on college campuses or in city centers. These programs allow citizens, visitors, students and others to check-out a bike from a self-serve station and take it from point A to point B. Bike-share programs have grown worldwide at an increasing rate within the past decade. Image 1 shows that in 2001 there were only four worldwide cities that adopted a bike-share program, but that number dramatically increased from the years 2002 to 2014, when there were eight-hundred and fifty-five worldwide cities with bike-share programs.
  • GOVERNING MICRO-MOBILITY: a NATIONWIDE ASSESSMENT of ELECTRIC SCOOTER REGULATIONS --Manuscript Draft

    GOVERNING MICRO-MOBILITY: a NATIONWIDE ASSESSMENT of ELECTRIC SCOOTER REGULATIONS --Manuscript Draft

    Transportation Research Record GOVERNING MICRO-MOBILITY: A NATIONWIDE ASSESSMENT OF ELECTRIC SCOOTER REGULATIONS --Manuscript Draft-- Full Title: GOVERNING MICRO-MOBILITY: A NATIONWIDE ASSESSMENT OF ELECTRIC SCOOTER REGULATIONS Abstract: The character of urban transportation and mobility is dramatically changing in part because of the explosive growth of shared-use modes (SUM) of travel such as ridesourcing bikesharing, carsharing and, more recently, electronic (e-)scooter-sharing. Although these new forms of mobility are freeing riders from mode- and ownership- constrained choices of travel, they are also creating tremendous uncertainty among planners and policymakers who are struggling to both understand and manage their potential impacts. Developing, adopting and enforcing regulations that aim to maximize transportation options while simultaneously ensuring public safety and the public good is proving to be a challenging task for municipal transportation planners given the rapid pace at which new systems of travel are evolving. Greater coordination between cities and the private and public sectors via the sharing of policy responses and transportation technology information will help facilitate collective learning and smoother transitions toward growing alternative transportation options in cities. Toward this end, the present paper draws from contemporary news articles, municipal and statewide policies and professional reports to provide timely guidance related to e- scooter sharing programs including information about vendors, vehicles,
  • Regional Bike Share in the Pioneer Valley

    Regional Bike Share in the Pioneer Valley

    Regional Bike Share in the Pioneer Valley Feasibility Study Produced by the Pioneer Valley Planning Commission in collaboration with the Bike Share Feasibility Study Advisory Committee and municipalities of Northampton, Amherst, Holyoke and Springfield December 2014 Produced by the Pioneer Valley Planning Commission with guidance from the Bike Share Feasibility Study Advisory Committee December 2014 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Section 1: Introduction and Purpose of Study .............................................................................................. 2 Background ........................................................................................................................................... 2 Funding Source and Study Participants ................................................................................................ 2 Advisory Committee ............................................................................................................................. 2 Goals and Objectives ............................................................................................................................. 4 History of Biking in Springfield .............................................................................................................. 6 Section 2: What Is Bike Sharing ? ................................................................................................................
  • 2017 Station Blvd Transportation Plan Update

    2017 Station Blvd Transportation Plan Update

    City of Aurora Station Boulevard Transit-Oriented Development – Transportation Plan Update December 5, 2017 Prepared in Partnership by: The Regional Transportation Authority The City of Aurora, IL Project Background and Overview The Station Boulevard Transportation Plan Update, completed by the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) through its Community Planning Program, and in partnership with the City of Aurora (City), examines multi-modal connections to the Route 59 Metra station for residential neighborhoods along Station Boulevard. Local knowledge, input and guidance was provided through the development of this plan by a steering committee comprised of representatives from the neighborhood, including residents and developers, as well as Metra staff. Additionally, Pace Suburban Bus and BNSF Railway staff offered technical assistance as needed through the duration of the project. The Station Boulevard Corridor is a Transit-Oriented Development located just south of the Route 59 Metra Station in Aurora. Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) is defined by the RTA as moderate to high-density, mixed-use communities located within close proximity of a rail or bus station designed to maximize walkability and transit access. TOD provides residents with increased mobility options, a variety of commercial outlets and jobs within a short distance of their homes while the compact style of development preserves open space. The Route 59 station is served by Metra Commuter Rail, connecting the residents along Station Boulevard with Downtown Chicago and points in between. This plan recommends multi-modal improvements that will enhance resident access to and from the station and is an update to the “Station Boulevard Shuttle” plan developed in 2009 for the City.
  • Dockless Bikes: Regulation Breakdown

    Dockless Bikes: Regulation Breakdown

    Brandon Bordenkircher & Riley L. O’Neil Twelve Tone Consulting [email protected] Dockless Bikes: Regulation Breakdown Photo by Riley L. O’Neil Introduction Over the past year, the streets of many international cities have been flooded with dockless bikes and that wave is currently hitting the U.S. Unlike current docking systems in the U.S., dockless bikes allow riders to end their rides and park anywhere they like. Dockless got its start in the U.S. in 2012, when Buffalo, NY launched their system using Social Bicycles (now called JUMP) and operated by Shared Mobility, Inc (now called Reddy Bikeshare) (Galligano, 2015). This paper looks at many positive and negative externalities dockless bikes can bring: offering affordable transit; ability to solve the issue of the last mile; saving cities money and making transportation more equitable by servicing transit deserts; and offering cities rider data with the potential to help city planners implement new bike infrastructure. The negative externalities deal with: bikes blocking public ways, thrown into trees and rivers; stories of companies launching without a proper permit and without notifying city officials; safety issues; reports of lack of maintenance on broken bikes; and problems of inconsistent availability and locations. Present day Amsterdam, a city with vast cycling culture that first introduced the historic “white” bike share in 1965, allowed dockless companies to launch without solidifying regulations. The launch went poorly, resulting in complete clutter (the opposite of the city's reputation) and the city eventually banned dockless bikes. The lesson to learn from Amsterdam is: no matter how 1 Brandon Bordenkircher & Riley L.
  • Table of Contents

    Table of Contents

    THE BIKE AND SCOOTERSHARING TELEMATICS MARKET INDEX Index Table of Contents Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................... i List of Figures ............................................................................................................................. vi Executive summary ..................................................................................................................... 1 1 Introduction to micromobility ............................................................................................... 3 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 3 1.1.1 Passenger cars in use by region ........................................................................... 5 1.1.2 New passenger car registration trends ................................................................. 6 1.1.3 Bicycle and scooter usage .................................................................................... 9 1.1.4 Shared mobility services ..................................................................................... 13 1.2 Market trends ............................................................................................................. 15 1.2.1 Peak car use and car ownership ......................................................................... 15 1.2.2 The sharing economy ........................................................................................