GLONASS Naya Sputnikovaya Sistema — Or Global Coordination Board, and Chairman of Satellite Navigation System.) the Forum’S Plenary Session; and Lt

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

GLONASS Naya Sputnikovaya Sistema — Or Global Coordination Board, and Chairman of Satellite Navigation System.) the Forum’S Plenary Session; and Lt GNSS WOrld deputy chief, head of the GLONASS naya Sputnikovaya Sistema — or global coordination board, and chairman of satellite navigation system.) the forum’s plenary session; and Lt. Gen. Alexander Kvasnikov, deputy Official Imprimatur gLOnASS commander of the Russian Space Formally enshrined in an April 19, Forces. 2006, government directive, Russia’s They were joined at the opening initiative to develop mass market The Way Ahead session by Yuri Urlichich, director gen- equipment and applications faces many eral of the Russian Institute of Space of the same obstacles to commercial- Device Engineering (RISDE), which ization that GPS has had to overcome designs the GLONASS space and during the past 15–20 years and some gLen gibbOns ground equipment; Nikolai Testoyedov, new challenges as well. Editor, insidE gnss director general of NPO PM “Reshet- The participation of several high- nev,” which builds the GLONASS satel- ranking U.S. officials involved in GPS lites; M. G. Lebedev, a senior advisor affairs reflected the growing coopera- to the Russian minister of communi- tion in GNSS programs between the Russia’s first major satellite cations and information; and Sergei two countries: Ken Hodgkins, deputy navigation conference underscores Burov, vice-governor of the Yaroslavs- director of the State Department’s kaya region near Moscow that has Office of Space & Advanced Technolo- the intention of the nation’s leaders served as a kind of GNSS showcase. gy; Mike Shaw, director of the National to turn GLONASS into a resource Roscosmos’ Perminov noted, Coordination Office for Space-Based for commercial and civil users. “Development of positioning, naviga- Positioning, Navigation, and Timing; And a surprising number of home- tion, and timing capabilities is one and U.S. Air Force Col. Mark Crews, of the top priorities of the Russian chief engineer at the GPS Wing in the grown GNSS providers attend to Federation, particularly through use Space & Missile Center, Los Angeles show some of the ways that they of GLONASS as a dual-use system. We Air Force Base. are transforming policy changes have a primary objective of [achiev- “Multiple [GNSS] systems create into business opportunities. ing] compatibility and interoperability a winning situation for consumers,” with, first, GPS, and, second, Galileo.” Urlichich said, announcing an initia- Russia has increased its federal tive to create a GLONASS Forum or budget allocation for GLONASS to 9.88 what he called “an association of lovers billion rubles ($379.7 million) in 2007, of GLONASS.” By working to make the more than double the 4.72 billion ruble various systems more compatible and ($181.4 million) federal expenditure interoperable, Urlichich said, Russia in 2006. Launches of six modernized will help lay the foundation for global GLONASS-M spacecraft are scheduled mass markets. “All together, it will esigners and manufacturers of GNSS products for Satellite Navigation Forum, which featured 87 speakers and this year — a triple launch in Septem- make it possible for mass consumers to consumer mass markets may find their next big three tracks of technical sessions. The event was organized by ber and another in December. have GNSS.” boost coming from a surprising source — Russia’s Profi-T-Centre, a Moscow-based conferencing company, and Despite its international title, the Russia’s struggle to transform a DGLONASS system. endorsed by the Russian Federal Space Agency (Roscosmos), event drew a largely Russian audience, command economy shaped by more That was an unmistakable message — and aspiration the Russian Ministry of Communications and Information, with only a few dozen attendees from than 70 years of top-down, Communist — expressed by a series of high-ranking Russian governmen- and the Moscow City Government on whose premises the outside the country. Nosenko under- Party–led governmental planning and tal officials and representatives of home-grown commercial forum took place. lined this aspect of the forum, saying, direction remains a work in progress. enterprises speaking at a major GNSS conference in Moscow An announcement of a decision to add a CDMA signal to “The primary purpose is to inform Many of the institutions, terminology, on April 9 and 10 — the 25th anniversary of the GLONASS GLONASS that would more closely align the Russian system a broad Russian audience of satellite and practices of market-based econo- program. with GPS and Galileo was not forthcoming at the conference, navigation and its applications.” mies remain unfamiliar to both public With 15 operational GLONASS satellites expected to be as many had hoped. Nonetheless, a remarkable number of Unlike GNSS conferences in most officials and nascent businesspeople. broadcasting by the end of April and 18 by the end of the private companies and public institutes joined the proceed- other venues, the focus was pointedly Lebedev, the Communications and year, Russia is looking to bolster its domestic market for ings and discussed their efforts to build and use combined on Russia’s own GLONASS system. Information Ministry advisor, under- GNSS commercial applications and project its presence into GLONASS and GPS receivers. Indeed, although the English transla- took a sort of tutorial on entrepre- international markets over the next few years. Russian offi- Russian President Vladimir Putin has put the restoration tion of the event’s title was “satellite neurialism and private business in his cials are fostering a GLONASS industry association and at of and modernization of GLONASS high on his political navigation,” the Russian name was presentation. “It is necessary,” he told least 120 Russian companies were reported to be active in the agenda and is following its progress closely, a fact underlined “International GLONASS Forum.” (In his plenary audience, “to understand GNSS sector. by the stature of the officials taking part in the forum: Anato- fact, GLONASS itself is the Russian the value chain in order to successfully More than 600 delegates registered for the International ly Perminov, head of Roscosmos; Yuri Nosenko, Roscosmos acronym for Global’naya Navigatsion- develop markets.” 20 InsideGNSS spring 2007 www.insidegnss.com www.insidegnss.com spring 2007 InsideGNSS 21 GNSS WOrld should complete the unit by CdMA: Decision Still to Come single point of failure if all GNSS signals at L1/E1, national next year. All this GNSS development activity is particularly remark- security issues, the matter of paying for new civil signal RISDE and the St. Peters- able considering that GLONASS is a frequency division mul- design, and an element of Russian uniqueness. burg–based Russian Institute tiple access (FDMA) system that differs markedly from GPS Numerous GNSS manufacturers — among them JNS, for Radionavigation and Time and Galileo. FDMA is, in fact, the inverse of GPS’s code divi- NovAtel, Trimble, Leica, Magellan, and Topcon — already (RIRT), two institutes that have sion multiple access (CDMA) design in which each satellite offer combined GPS/GLONASS receivers, typically for pro- relied on government support broadcasts a distinctly coded signal on a common frequency. fessional and commercial activities such as surveying, geod- for much of their existence, In contrast, GLONASS transmits a single code on dif- esy, and construction. But such equipment is substantially have launched commercial ferent frequencies allocated to antipodal sets of GLONASS more complicated in design and expensive — a long way development activities. RISDE’s satellites using two swaths of spectrum — currently from from becoming consumer-friendly. M. G. Lebedev Yuri Urlichich Lt. Gen. Alexander Kvasnikov Urlichich described an agree- 1598.0625 to 1609.3125 MHz (above GPS L1 centered at By having a L1 civil signal apart from the band in which ment signed last month for a 1575.42 MHz) and from 1242.9375 – 1251.6875 MHz for L2 consumers will find most benefit from GPS and Galileo (and, Lebedev showed several slides from presentations by the “public-private partnership that will develop and produce (compared with 1227.6 MHz for GPS L2). for that matter, China’s Compass GNSS), GLONASS requires Galileo Joint Undertaking and the U.S. Office of Space Com- user equipment.” The $64 million question — or, closer to the mark, the manufacturers to widen the reach of their receivers’ antennas merce to illustrate the GNSS value-added chain and GNSS S. V. Filantchenkov, deputy chief of RIRT’s research divi- $68-billion question (to pick up on Shaw’s projection for the and “front-end” components. market projections. Later, he noted that in order to “extract sion, traced several generations of GPS/GLONASS receivers global GNSS market in 2010) — is how compatible the Rus- As the GPS Wing’s Crews pointed out in his presentation, profits in this sector, we need to develop business models.” developed by the institute since 2004. Known primarily for sians will decide that GLONASS will be. Russia has commit- the key technical issue may be that CDMA-based systems Although the level of such discussions might seem basic developing the atomic clocks for GLONASS satellites and ted to reaching a decision on the question of adding a CDMA can more easily filter out a common delay in the GNSS time — even primitive — to Western ears, it does reflect a clear ground facilities, RIRT is currently designing a receiver that signal by the end of 2007. signals on a common frequency. With FDMA systems, he desire to learn how to do business in a completely new way. can process GLONASS M and GPS IIR signals. By next year, Different perspectives and philosophies are competing continued, “We can calibrate our filtering for multiple fre- Filantchenkov said, the institute’s engineers expect to com- among the country’s various institutional groups. A new gen- quencies [and time delays], but it increases costs. That means Home-Grown GNSS plete an OEM GPS/GLONASS/Galileo RFIC module that eration of engineers appears inclined to forge greater interop- it’s an issue for making affordable, mass market equipment.” Perhaps the most notable aspect of the conference emerged in would sell in the $12 range for large volumes.
Recommended publications
  • GLONASS System As a Tool for Space Weather Monitoring
    GLONASS System as a tool for space weather monitoring V.V. Alpatov, S.N. Karutin, А.Yu. Repin Institute of Applied Geophysics, Roshydromet TSNIIMASH, Roscosmos BAKU-2018 PLAN OF PRESENTATION General information about GLONASS Goals Organization and Management Technical information about GLONASS Space Weather Effects On Space Systems On Ground based Systems Possible Opportunities of GLONASS for Monitoring Space Weather Effects Russian Monitoring System for Monitoring Space Weather Effects with Use Opportunities of GLONASS 2 GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT GLONASS NATIONAL SATELLITE NAVIGATION POLICY AND ORGANIZATION Presidential Decree of May 17, 2007 No. 638 On Use of GLONASS (Global Navigation Satellite System) for the Benefit of Social and Economic Development of the Russian Federation Federal Program on GLONASS Sustainment, Development and Use for 2012-2020 – planning and budgeting instrument for GLONASS development and use Budget planning for the forthcoming decade – up to 2030 GLONASS Program governance: Roscosmos State Space Corporation Government Contracting Authority – Program Coordinator Government Contracting Authorities Program Scientific and Coordination Board GLONASS Program Goals: Improving GLONASS performance – its accuracy and integrity Ensuring positioning, navigation and timing solutions in restricted visibility of satellites, interference and jamming conditions Enhancing current application efficiency and broadening application domains 3 CHARACTERISTICS IMPROVEMENT PLAN Accuracy Improvement by means of: . Ground Segment
    [Show full text]
  • GLONASS Interface Control Document Specifies Parameters of Interface Between GLONASS Space Segment and User Equipment
    GLOBALNAVIGATION SATELLITE SYSTEM GLONASS TION CENTER INTERFACE CONTROL DOCUMENT COORDINATION SCIENTIFIC INFORMA MOSCOW 1998ã. Version 4.0 1998 GLONASS ICD COORDINATION SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION CENTER TABLE OF CONTENTS FIGURES................................................................................................................................................................... 2 TABLES .................................................................................................................................................................... 3 ABBREVIATIONS.................................................................................................................................................... 4 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 GLONASS PURPOSE.......................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 GLONASS COMPONENTS .................................................................................................................................. 5 1.3 NAVIGATION DETERMINATION CONCEPT ............................................................................................................. 5 2. GENERAL............................................................................................................................................................. 6 2.1 ICD DEFINITION ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Posture in Space
    Russia’s Posture in Space: Prospects for Europe Executive Summary Prepared by the European Space Policy Institute Marco ALIBERTI Ksenia LISITSYNA May 2018 Table of Contents Background and Research Objectives ........................................................................................ 1 Domestic Developments in Russia’s Space Programme ............................................................ 2 Russia’s International Space Posture ......................................................................................... 4 Prospects for Europe .................................................................................................................. 5 Background and Research Objectives For the 50th anniversary of the launch of Sputnik-1, in 2007, the rebirth of Russian space activities appeared well on its way. After the decade-long crisis of the 1990s, the country’s political leadership guided by President Putin gave new impetus to the development of national space activities and put the sector back among the top priorities of Moscow’s domestic and foreign policy agenda. Supported by the progressive recovery of Russia’s economy, renewed political stability, and an improving external environment, Russia re-asserted strong ambitions and the resolve to regain its original position on the international scene. Towards this, several major space programmes were adopted, including the Federal Space Programme 2006-2015, the Federal Target Programme on the development of Russian cosmodromes, and the Federal Target Programme on the redeployment of GLONASS. This renewed commitment to the development of space activities was duly reflected in a sharp increase in the country’s launch rate and space budget throughout the decade. Thanks to the funds made available by flourishing energy exports, Russia’s space expenditure continued to grow even in the midst of the global financial crisis. Besides new programmes and increased funding, the spectrum of activities was also widened to encompass a new focus on space applications and commercial products.
    [Show full text]
  • GLONASS Spacecraft
    INNO V AT IO N The task of designing and developing the GLONASS GLONASS spacecraft fell to the Scientific Production Association of Applied Mechan­ ics (Nauchno Proizvodstvennoe Ob"edinenie Spacecraft Prikladnoi Mekaniki or NPO PM) , located near Krasnoyarsk in Siberia. This major aero­ Nicholas L. Johnson space industrial complex was established in 1959 as a division of Sergei Korolev 's Kaman Sciences Corporation Expe1imental Design Bureau (Opytno Kon­ struktorskoe Byuro or OKB). (Korolev , among other notable achievements , led the Fourteen years after the launch of the effort to develop the Soviet Union's first first test spacecraft, the Russian Global Nav­ launch vehicle - the A launcher - which igation Satellite System (Global 'naya Navi­ placed Sputnik 1 into orbit.) The founding gatsionnaya Sputnikovaya Sistema or and current general director and chief GLONASS) program remains viable and designer is Mikhail Fyodorovich Reshetnev, essentially on schedule despite the economic one of only two still-active chief designers and political turmoil surrounding the final from Russia's fledgling 1950s-era space years of the Soviet Union and the emergence program. of the Commonwealth of Independent States A closed facility until the early 1990s, (CIS). By the summer of 1994, a total of 53 NPO PM has been responsible for all major GLONASS spacecraft had been successfully Russian operational communications, navi­ Despite the significant economic hardships deployed in nearly semisynchronous orbits; gation, and geodetic satellite systems to associated with the breakup of the Soviet Union of the 53 , nearly 12 had been normally oper­ date. Serial (or assembly-line) production of and the transition to a modern market economy, ational since the establishment of the Phase I some spacecraft, including Tsikada and Russia continues to develop its space programs, constellation in 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 BMW Cospas-Sarat Updates Secretariat
    2012 Beacon Manufacturers’ Workshop Orlando, Florida 28 September 2012 Cospas-Sarsat Updates Dany St-Pierre Cospas-SSSarsat Secretar iat 0 Source: CNES – D. Ducros Cospas-Sarsat Updates • Intern ati on al Cospas-Sarsat Pr ogr amm e • Space Segment and LUTs status • Saves and Events • MEOSAR System and status • IBRD and Website Updates • Upcoming Events and Activities Cospas-Sarsat Mission and Objective Mission: To provide accurate, timely and reliable distress alert and location data to help SAR authorities assist persons in distress. Objective: To reduce, as far as possible, delays in the provision of distress alerts to SAR and the time to locate a distress and provide assistance. Strategy: To implement, maintain, co-ordinate and operate a satellite system capable of detecting tiitransmissions from radio-beacons tha t complywith C/S specifications. Cospas-Sarsat Participants Netherlands New Algeria Zealand Argentina Nigeria Australia Norway Brazil Pakistan Canada Peru Chile Poland China (P.R.) Russia Cyprus Saudi Denmark Arabia Finland Serbia France Singapore Germany South Africa Greece Spain Hong Kong Sweden India Switzerland Indonesia Thailand Italy Tunisia ITDC Turkey Japan UAE Korea (R. of) UK 4 Founders: Canada, France, Russia and the USA Madagascar USA • 60 % of world land area Vietnam 26 GdStPidGround Segment Providers • 72 % of world population 11 User States 2 Organisations • 84 % of estimated world wealth Cospas-Sarsat System Combined LEO / GEO Operations • LEOSAR: Sarsat (NOAA, MetOp) and Cospas • GEOSAR: GOES (USA), INSAT
    [Show full text]
  • Nüvi® 610/660/670 © 2006–2007 Garmin Ltd
    Owner’s Manual nüvi® 610/660/670 © 2006–2007 Garmin Ltd. or its subsidiaries Garmin International, Inc. Garmin (Europe) Ltd. Garmin Corporation 1200 East 151st Street, Unit 5, The Quadrangle, No. 68, Jangshu 2nd Olathe, Kansas 66062, USA Abbey Park Industrial Estate, Road, Shijr, Taipei Tel. 913/397.8200 or Romsey, SO51 9DL, UK County, Taiwan 800/800.1020 Tel. +44 (0) 870.8501241 (outside the UK) or Tel. 886/2.2642.9199 Fax 913/397.8282 0808 2380000 (UK only) Fax 886/2.2642.9099 Fax 44/0870.8501251 All rights reserved. Except as expressly provided herein, no part of this manual may be reproduced, copied, transmitted, disseminated, downloaded or stored in any storage medium, for any purpose without the express prior written consent of Garmin. Garmin hereby grants permission to download a single copy of this manual onto a hard drive or other electronic storage medium to be viewed and to print one copy of this manual or of any revision hereto, provided that such electronic or printed copy of this manual must contain the complete text of this copyright notice and provided further that any unauthorized commercial distribution of this manual or any revision hereto is strictly prohibited. 0191 Information in this document is subject to change without notice. Garmin reserves the right to change or improve its products and to make changes in the content without obligation to notify any person or organization of such changes or improvements. Visit the Garmin Web site (www.garmin.com) for current updates and supplemental information concerning the use and operation of this and other Garmin products.
    [Show full text]
  • GLONASS Space Service Volume
    GLONASS space service volume JSC “Academician M.F.Reshetnev” Information Satellite Systems” V. Kosenko, A. Grechkoseev, M. Sanzharov ICG-9 WG-B, Prague, Czech Republic– November 2014 Spacecraft in Highly Geosynchronous Altitude Elliptical Orbit GLONASS Altitude: 19100 km Low Earth Orbit: Altitudes < 3000 km GLONASS Satellite GLONASS ‘Main Lobe’ Spacecraft in GLONASS Geosynchronous Orbit ‘over-the-limb’ signal CSNC-2011ICG-9 WGConference B May 2011 Prague, November 2014 2 Definitions Notes Lower Space Service Volume (also Four GLONASS signals available simultaneously a majority known as 'MEO altitudes'): 3000 to of the time but GLONASS signals over the limb of the Earth 8000 km altitude become increasingly important. One-meter orbit accuracies are feasible (post processed). Upper Space Service Volume (GEO Nearly all GLONASS signals received over the limb of the and HEO with the exception of the Earth. Accuracies ranging from 20 to 200 meters are feasible perigee area): 8000 to 36000 km (post-processed) depending on receiver sensitivity and local altitude oscillator stability. CSNC-2011ICG-9 WGConference B May 2011 Prague, November 2014 3 Parameters Value User range error 1.4 meters Minimum Received Civilian Signal With account of the Reference Off-Boresite Angle Power (GEO) GLONASS satellite’s transmitter antenna gain pattern L11,2 -180 ÷ -185 dBW 14 – 20 deg L2 -177 ÷ -184.4 dBW 14 – 28 deg L3 -176 ÷ -184 dBW 14 – 28 deg Signal availability3 MEO at 8000 km At least 1 signal 4 or more signals L1 81% 64% L2, L3 100% 66% Upper Space Service Volume (HEO/ At least 1 signal 4 or more signals GEO) L1 70% 2.7% L2, L3 100% 29% Note 1 – FDMA signals in L1 and L2 bands and CDMA signals in L3 Note 2 – L1, L2 signals are transmitted by GLONASS-M and GLONASS-K satellites.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALGARY New Enhanced Sensitivity Detection
    UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY New Enhanced Sensitivity Detection Techniques for GPS L1 C/A and Modernized Signal Acquisition by Surendran K. Shanmugam A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF GEOMATICS ENGINEERING CALGARY, ALBERTA January, 2008 c Surendran K. Shanmugam 2008 ISBN: 978-0-494-38222-6 Abstract Throughout history, there has been a constant effort to master the art of navigation for its importance in trade and commerce. Even today, this pursuit of better navigation is still active for its continual impact in various fields. In the last decade, the navigation field witnessed drastic changes with the advent of global navigation satellite system (GNSS) in the form of the global positioning system (GPS). This decade is currently witnessing the expansion of its scope far beyond its traditional focus. On the other hand, these expansions has brought upon new challenges to the current GPS system that were never encountered before. Hence, the legacy GPS system is expected to overcome some stern impediments inherent to these new applications for its continual dominance. For instance, massive signal attenuation, radio frequency interference (RFI) and multipath readily represents, the axis of evil, in the view point of GPS operations as applied to these new applications. More specifically, massive signal attenuation and RFI conditions poses a grave difficulty in terms of traditional GPS operations. Subsequently, one has to resort to enhanced sensitivity GPS receivers for successful GPS operations under these adverse signal conditions. A number of detection algorithms have been utilized to permit successful GPS operations under degraded signal environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Technology and Telecommunication" Cluster of the Skolkovo Foundation
    STRATEGIC DIRECTIONS AND PRIORITY AREAS OF DEVELOPMENT FOR "S PACE TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATION " CLUSTER OF THE SKOLKOVO FOUNDATION 2012 Strategic Directions and Priority Areas of Development for "Space Technology and Telecommunication" Cluster of the Skolkovo Foundation The present document describes the results of methodology development and evaluation of strategic directions and priority areas for "Space Technology and Telecommunication" Cluster of the Skolkovo Fund. The first iteration was obtained by ST&T expert group with assistance of leading space R&D institutes using the Federal Space Agency materials. The Strategic Directions will be subsequently specified under the foresight research based on the contract between the Skolkovo Fund and one of the leading R&D and consulting organizations in the field of space activity and its results' commercialization. The Glossary can be found at the end of the document EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: PRIORITIES ST&T Cluster ensures search for, attraction and selection of potential subjects of innovative process in the field of development and target use of spacecrafts operation and diversification of rocket and space industry potential, facilitates their cooperation and provides the environment for full cycle innovation process establishment, based on the Strategic directions and priority areas of development, initially defined by this document and regularly updated considering opinion of sci-tech and business community that is identified in process of foresight procedure. At the moment, the Cluster finds it necessary, along with comprehensive support for innovative activity of the Skolkovo Fund participants and applicants, to focus on proactive implementation of several priority areas which particularly include: Establishing national infrastructure of full cycle microsatellite technology which involves leading universities.
    [Show full text]
  • English and Russian Only
    A/AC.105/C.1/2013/CRP.22 18 February 2013 English and Russian only Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space Scientific and Technical Subcommittee Fiftieth session Vienna, 11-22 February 2013 International cooperation in the peaceful uses of outer space: activities of Member States* Note by the Secretariat I. Introduction 1. In the report on its forty-ninth session, the Scientific and Technical Subcommittee of the Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space recommended that the Secretariat continue to invite Member States to submit annual reports on their space activities (A/AC.105/1001, para. 29). 2. In a note verbale dated 31 July 2012, the Secretary-General invited Governments to submit their reports by 19 October 2012. The present note was prepared by the Secretariat on the basis of a report received from the Russian Federation after 19 October 2012 in response to that invitation. 3. The replies contained in the present document are original documents, as submitted, and were not formally edited. __________________ * The present paper is reproduced in the form in which it was received. V.13-80960 (E) *1380960* A/AC.105/C.1/2013/CRP.22 II. Replies received from Member States Russian Federation [English] National activities and international cooperation of the Russian Federation in the exploration and use of outer space for peaceful purposes in 2012 (as at 31 December 2012) The national space activities of the Russian Federation in 2012 were carried out by the Russian Federal Space Agency (Roscosmos) under the Russian Federal Space Programme, the Global Navigation Satellite System (GLONASS) special federal programme and other special programmes, in cooperation with the Russian Academy of Sciences, the Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation and other clients and users of space information and services.
    [Show full text]
  • User Guide for Egnos Application Developers
    USER GUIDE FOR EGNOS APPLICATION DEVELOPERS ED 2.0, 15/12/2011 Preface After more than 10 years of development and qualification efforts bringing together actors from across the European continent, including project teams, industrial teams, and operators, for the first time Europe has at its disposal a GNSS infrastructure which delivers, on a permanent basis and according to international civil aviation standards, a satellite navigation service covering much of the continent. For all space sector participants, it is extremely gratifying to see a programme having origina- ted in research and development leaving the space agency sphere and entering into the world of services addressed at a vast community of users. After telecommunications, meteorology, oceanography, search and rescue and Earth observation, we are now seeing the emergence of a new area of operational space activity, which clearly illustrates the unique and essential contribution space can make to citizens. The success of a development activity is a crucial step on the way to the success of a pro- gramme. For it to become a total success, efforts must now focus on ensuring that users, in all application areas, can obtain easy access to services, making those services straightforward to use and, of course, on guaranteeing quality of service over time. This guide is designed to acquaint the user with the system and to provide the essential tech- nical information that users and application developers require if they are to make the best possible use of EGNOS. CNES, the European Space Agency and the European Commission are proud to have contri- buted to the development of the EGNOS system, and thank all participants in this effort, both public and industrial, for their contributions to and support for the programme.
    [Show full text]
  • GLONASS Global Satellite Navigation System
    GLONASS Global Satellite System GLONASSGLONASS GlobalGlobal SatelliteSatellite NavigationNavigation SystemSystem Author: Y. Medvedkov - GEOTsUP Presented by: M. Sowinski - SGS Belgium Status: December 2002 GLONASS Global Satellite System About the presentation • This presentation was developed in the scope of the EuropeAid funded project: “Certification of the Global Satellite Navigation System (GNSS) - creation of a unified system to certify GNSS equipment and a certification centre” • Project duration: 7 June 2000 - 7 August 2002 • Project leader: SGS-Belgium • Consortium Members: – International Institute of Air and Space Law (IIASL) - NL – IMEC - B, Aero-DB - B – Russian and CIS experts from: GeoTSUP, RAKA, Rostelecom, Gosstandard of RF, Morsvyazsputnik, SDB Kamerton -BR, MinTran - Ukraine, Temir Zholy - KZ GLONASS Global Satellite System GLONASS System Architecture OrbitalOrbital Constellation: Constellation: 2424 satellites satellites (3(3 planes planes x x 8 8 satellites satellites)) OrbitOrbit type: type:circularcircular, , HH = = 19 19 100 100 km km,, i i= = 64.8° 64.8° OrbitalOrbital period: period: 1111hrhr1515minmin TheThe orbits orbits are are shifted shifted by by 120°120° along along the the equator equator GLONASS Global Satellite System Normative documents of the GLONASS development Directive of the RF President ? 38-rp as of February 18th, 1999 Ø GLONASS is treated as a dual-purpose space technology. Ø It is allowed to attract foreign investments to finance works on GLONASS through making the system available for the implementation of an international global satellite navigation system. Resolution of the RF Government ? 346 as of March 29th, 1999 Ø Decision on making GLONASS available for the implementation and development of international global satellite navigation systems. Ø Regulation validated on sharing responsibilities on maintenance, operation and development of GLONASS between the Federal Executive Agencies.
    [Show full text]