DOCSLIB.ORG

List of Russian Space Launch Vehicle Failures Since Dec. 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
List of Russian Space Launch Vehicle Failures Since Dec. 2010 Fact Sheet Updated March 25, 2019 LIST OF RUSSIAN SPACE LAUNCH FAILURES SINCE DEC. 2010 Russia’s once reliable fleet of space launch vehicles began a string of failures beginning in December 2010 that has created significant consternation in Russia’s space program and brought about firings and reorganizations, but the failures continue. Following is a list, with links to SpacePolicyOnline.com articles where available. • December 2010, Proton-Block DM, upper stage failure, three Russian GLONASS navigation satellites lost • February 2011, GEO-IK2, Rokot-Briz, upper stage failure, Russian geodetic satellite stranded in transfer orbit • August 2011, Ekspress AM-4, Proton-Briz, upper stage failure, Russian communications satellite stranded in transfer orbit • August 2011, Progress M-12M (called Progress 44 by NASA), Soyuz U-Fregat, third stage failure due to clogged fuel line, Russian cargo spacecraft for International Space Station lost • November 2011, Phobos-Grunt, Zenit-Fregat, upper stage failure, Russian Mars-bound spacecraft stranded in Earth orbit • December 2011, Soyuz 2.1a, third stage failure, Russian Meridian military communication satellite lost • August 2012, Proton-Briz, upper stage failure, Russian Ekspress-MD2 and Indonesian Telkom-3 communications satellites stranded in transfer orbit • December 2012, Proton-Briz, upper stage failure, Russian Yamal 402 communications satellite delivered to wrong orbit. • January 2013, Rokot-Briz KM, upper stage failure. Three Russian Strela military communications satellites incorrectly placed into orbit; one (Kosmos 2483) nonfunctional. • February 2013, Zenit-3SL Sea Launch, first stage hydraulic pump failure, Intelsat-27 communications satellite lost • July 2013, Proton-M failure immediately after launch due to incorrectly installed angular velocity sensors, three Russian GLONASS navigation satellites lost • May 2014, Proton-M failure, failed bearing in third stage steering engine, Russian Ekspress-AM4R communications satellite and Briz upper stage lost (replacement for Ekspress-AM4 satellite lost in August 2011) • August 2014, Soyuz ST-B/Fregat malfunction due to frozen hydrazine left two European Galileo navigation satellites in wrong orbit (launch was by Arianespace from Kourou, French Guiana) • April 2015, Soyuz 2.1a malfunction at time of separation from Progress M-27M spacecraft, a cargo mission to ISS (NASA calls it Progress 59). Spacecraft placed in wrong orbit, made uncontrolled reentry over Pacific Ocean May 7, 2015 EDT. Investigation determine cause was “design peculiarity.” • (list continues on next page) By Marcia S. Smith ©Space and Technology Policy Group, LLC 2 • May 2015, Proton-M/Briz-M failure, design flaw in turbopump of third stage steering engine. Mexican MexSat-1 (Centenario) lost. • December 2015, Soyuz 2.1v Volga upper stage failure, military Kanopus-ST satellite lost • June 9, 2016 – not a Proton launch failure (the Intelsat 31 satellite successfully reached orbit), but problems with the second stage resulted in an investigation that grounded all Proton launches for almost a year after manufacturing defects were found in the second and third stage engines [see Anatoly Zak’s account on RussianSpaceWeb.com for details]. • December 2016, Soyuz-U, malfunction during third stage operation, Progress MS-04 cargo spacecraft lost due to third stage engine failure (fire in the oxidizer pump) • November 2017, Soyuz 2.1b/Fregat, Meteor M2-1 weather satellite and 18 cubesats lost apparently due to incorrect programming of navigation equipment on the Fregat upper stage. • October 2018, Soyuz FG, Soyuz MS-10 crew launch to ISS. Strap-on collided with core stage approximately 2 minutes after liftoff instead of separating due to human error when mating the strap-on to the rocket (separation pin was bent). Automated systems instantly separated the crew capsule carrying Russian cosmonaut Aleksey Ovchinin and NASA astronaut Nick Hague and it landed safely. By Marcia S. Smith ©Space and Technology Policy Group, LLC .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GLONASS System As a Tool for Space Weather Monitoring
    GLONASS System as a tool for space weather monitoring V.V. Alpatov, S.N. Karutin, А.Yu. Repin Institute of Applied Geophysics, Roshydromet TSNIIMASH, Roscosmos BAKU-2018 PLAN OF PRESENTATION General information about GLONASS Goals Organization and Management Technical information about GLONASS Space Weather Effects On Space Systems On Ground based Systems Possible Opportunities of GLONASS for Monitoring Space Weather Effects Russian Monitoring System for Monitoring Space Weather Effects with Use Opportunities of GLONASS 2 GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT GLONASS NATIONAL SATELLITE NAVIGATION POLICY AND ORGANIZATION Presidential Decree of May 17, 2007 No. 638 On Use of GLONASS (Global Navigation Satellite System) for the Benefit of Social and Economic Development of the Russian Federation Federal Program on GLONASS Sustainment, Development and Use for 2012-2020 – planning and budgeting instrument for GLONASS development and use Budget planning for the forthcoming decade – up to 2030 GLONASS Program governance: Roscosmos State Space Corporation Government Contracting Authority – Program Coordinator Government Contracting Authorities Program Scientific and Coordination Board GLONASS Program Goals: Improving GLONASS performance – its accuracy and integrity Ensuring positioning, navigation and timing solutions in restricted visibility of satellites, interference and jamming conditions Enhancing current application efficiency and broadening application domains 3 CHARACTERISTICS IMPROVEMENT PLAN Accuracy Improvement by means of: . Ground Segment
    [Show full text]
  • GLONASS Interface Control Document Specifies Parameters of Interface Between GLONASS Space Segment and User Equipment
    GLOBALNAVIGATION SATELLITE SYSTEM GLONASS TION CENTER INTERFACE CONTROL DOCUMENT COORDINATION SCIENTIFIC INFORMA MOSCOW 1998ã. Version 4.0 1998 GLONASS ICD COORDINATION SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION CENTER TABLE OF CONTENTS FIGURES................................................................................................................................................................... 2 TABLES .................................................................................................................................................................... 3 ABBREVIATIONS.................................................................................................................................................... 4 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 GLONASS PURPOSE.......................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 GLONASS COMPONENTS .................................................................................................................................. 5 1.3 NAVIGATION DETERMINATION CONCEPT ............................................................................................................. 5 2. GENERAL............................................................................................................................................................. 6 2.1 ICD DEFINITION ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Shuttle-Mir Rendezvous & [Locking Missions
    / tv -t_ ---Fi>{ NASA-TM-II2692 • _7, w- -_ ° ;: Fourth Report of the Task Force on the Shuttle-Mir Rendezvous & [locking Missions March 1, 1995 A Task Force of the NASA Advisory Council THOMAS P. STAFFORD 1006 Cameron Street Alexandria, VA 22314 March 1, 1995 Dr. Bradford Paxkinson Chairman, National Aeronautics and Space Administration Advisory Council National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, DC 20546-0001 Dear Dr. Parkinson: Enclosed is the fourth report of the NAC Task Force on the Shuttle-Mir Rendezvous and Docking Missions. This report is the culmination of a two and one-half month review of preparations in Russia for the Phase 1A missions (Soyuz TM-21, Mir 18 Main Expedition, and STS-71). Once again the Task Force received tremendous support from many individuals and organizations at NASA. The same applied to our site visits in Russia where we were met with an openness and candor which served to reinforce our confidence in the ultimate success of the upcoming missions. Over the next two months, the Task Force will be focusing its efforts in two areas. The first are the preparations for STS-71, including the status of the Orbiter Docking System and the analysis of data produced by the STS-63 mission. The second area is the NASA and NASA contractor presence in Russia, including the interaction of Phase 1 and Phase 2 personnel, NASA and contractor functions, and the transition from Phase 1 to Phase 2. Sincerely, Thomas P. Stafford CC: NASA/HQ/Code A/Mr. Goldin NASA/HQ/Code A/Gen. Dailey NASA/HQ/Code A/Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • OUFTI-1 Environmental Impact Assessment
    Date: 11/02/2016 Issue: 1 Rev: 1 Page: 1 of 11 OUFTI-1 Environmental Impact Assessment Reference 3_OUF_ENV_IMPACT_1.0 Issue/Rev Issue 1 Rev 0 Date 11/02/2016 Distribution OUFTI-1 team OUFTI-1 Environmental Impact Assessment Date: 11/02/2016 Issue: 1 Rev: 1 Page: 2 of 11 AUTHORS Name Email Telephone X. Werner [email protected] +32 4 366 37 38 S. De Dijcker [email protected] +32 4 366 37 38 RECORD OF REVISIONS Iss/Rev Date Author Section/page Change description 1/0 11/02/2016 X.Werner, All Initial issue S. De Dijcker Copyright University of Liège [2016]. OUFTI-1 Environmental Impact Assessment Date: 11/02/2016 Issue: 1 Rev: 1 Page: 3 of 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS Authors ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Record of revisions ..................................................................................................................... 2 1. Activities and Objectives ................................................................................................... 4 1.1. Project description ....................................................................................................... 4 1.2. Soyuz launch vehicle ................................................................................................... 5 1.3. Arianespace ................................................................................................................. 7 1.4. Conclusion ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • P26-27.Qxp Layout 1
    26 Friday Friday, October 12, 2018 Lifestyle | Feature Rocket bound for ISS fails, crew survives emergency landing BAIKONUR, Kazakhstan: NASA astronaut Nick Hague, a member of the International Space Station (ISS) expedition 57/58, is helped by specialists as his space suit is tested at the Russian-leased BAIKONUR, Kazakhstan: Spacesuits gloves are seen prior to the launch of the Soyuz MS-10 Baikonur cosmodrome in Kazakhstan. —AFP photos spacecraft. BAIKONUR, Kazakhstan: A two-man crew having their blood pressure taken. The de- bound for the International Space Station scent was sharper than usual meaning the was forced to make an emergency landing crew was subjected to a greater G-force, but when a Soyuz rocket failed shortly after they have been prepared for this scenario in blast-off on Thursday, in a major setback for training, according to a commentator on Russia’s beleaguered space industry. US as- NASA’s video livestream of the launch. tronaut Nick Hague and Russian cosmonaut “We’re tightening our seatbelts,” Ovchinin Aleksey Ovchinin were rescued without in- said on the video. “That was a short flight.” juries in Kazakhstan. The manned spacecraft “Thank God the cosmonauts are alive,” incident is the first of its kind in Russia’s Russian President Vladimir Putin’s post-Soviet history. spokesman Dmitry Peskov told journalists. The Russian space industry has suffered Deputy Prime Minister Yuri Borisov told a series of problems in recent years, includ- news agencies that Russia would suspend ing the loss of a number of satellites and manned flights. Roscosmos’s online stream of other spacecraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet Steps Toward Permanent Human Presence in Space
    SALYUT: Soviet Steps Toward Permanent Human Presence in Space December 1983 NTIS order #PB84-181437 Recommended Citation: SALYUT: Soviet Steps Toward Permanent Human Presence in Space–A Technical Mere- orandum (Washington, D. C.: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, OTA- TM-STI-14, December 1983). Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 83-600624 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 Foreword As the other major spacefaring nation, the Soviet Union is a subject of interest to the American people and Congress in their deliberations concerning the future of U.S. space activities. In the course of an assessment of Civilian Space Stations, the Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) has undertaken a study of the presence of Soviets in space and their Salyut space stations, in order to provide Congress with an informed view of Soviet capabilities and intentions. The major element in this technical memorandum was a workshop held at OTA in December 1982: it was the first occasion when a significant number of experts in this area of Soviet space activities had met for extended unclassified discussion. As a result of the workshop, OTA prepared this technical memorandum, “Salyut: Soviet Steps Toward Permanent Human Presence in Space. ” It has been reviewed extensively by workshop participants and others familiar with Soviet space activities. Also in December 1982, OTA wrote to the U. S. S. R.’s Ambassador to the United States Anatoliy Dobrynin, requesting any information concerning present and future Soviet space activities that the Soviet Union judged could be of value to the OTA assess- ment of civilian space stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Design for Demise Analysis for Launch Vehicles
    A first design for demise analysis for launch vehicles Henrik Simon, Stijn Lemmens Space debris: Inactive, manmade objects in space Source: ESA Overview Introduction Fundamentals Modelling approach Results and discussion Summary and outlook What is the motivation and task? INTRODUCTION Motivation . Mitigation: Prevention of creation and limitation of long-term presence . Guidelines: LEO removal within 25 years . LEO removal within 25 years after mission end . Casualty risk limit for re-entry: 1 in 10,000 Rising altitude Decay & re-entry above 2000 km Source: NASA Source: NASA Solution: Design for demise Source: ESA Scope of the thesis . Typical design of upper stages . General Risk assessment . Design for demise solutions to reduce the risk ? ? ? Risk A Risk B Risk C Source: CNES How do we assess the risk and simulate the re-entry? FUNDAMENTALS Fundamentals: Ground risk assessment Ah = + 2 Ai � ℎ = =1 � Source: NASA Source: NASA 3.5 m 5.0 m 2 2 ≈ ≈ Fundamentals: Re-entry simulation tools SCARAB: Spacecraft-oriented approach . CAD-like modelling . 6 DoF flight dynamics . Break-up / fragmentation computed How does a rocket upper stage look like? MODELLING Modelling approach . Research on typical design: . Elongated . Platform . Solid Rocket Motor . Lack of information: . Create common intersection . Deliberately stay top-level and only compare effects Modelling approach Modelling approach 12 Length [m] 9 7 5 3 2 150 300 500 700 800 1500 2200 Mass [kg] How much is the risk and how can we reduce it? SIMULATIONS Example of SCARAB re-entry simulation 6x Casualty risk of all reference cases Typical survivors Smaller Smaller fragments fragments Pressure tanks Pressure tanks Main tank Engine Main structure + tanks Design for Demise .
    [Show full text]
  • GLONASS Spacecraft
    INNO V AT IO N The task of designing and developing the GLONASS GLONASS spacecraft fell to the Scientific Production Association of Applied Mechan­ ics (Nauchno Proizvodstvennoe Ob"edinenie Spacecraft Prikladnoi Mekaniki or NPO PM) , located near Krasnoyarsk in Siberia. This major aero­ Nicholas L. Johnson space industrial complex was established in 1959 as a division of Sergei Korolev 's Kaman Sciences Corporation Expe1imental Design Bureau (Opytno Kon­ struktorskoe Byuro or OKB). (Korolev , among other notable achievements , led the Fourteen years after the launch of the effort to develop the Soviet Union's first first test spacecraft, the Russian Global Nav­ launch vehicle - the A launcher - which igation Satellite System (Global 'naya Navi­ placed Sputnik 1 into orbit.) The founding gatsionnaya Sputnikovaya Sistema or and current general director and chief GLONASS) program remains viable and designer is Mikhail Fyodorovich Reshetnev, essentially on schedule despite the economic one of only two still-active chief designers and political turmoil surrounding the final from Russia's fledgling 1950s-era space years of the Soviet Union and the emergence program. of the Commonwealth of Independent States A closed facility until the early 1990s, (CIS). By the summer of 1994, a total of 53 NPO PM has been responsible for all major GLONASS spacecraft had been successfully Russian operational communications, navi­ Despite the significant economic hardships deployed in nearly semisynchronous orbits; gation, and geodetic satellite systems to associated with the breakup of the Soviet Union of the 53 , nearly 12 had been normally oper­ date. Serial (or assembly-line) production of and the transition to a modern market economy, ational since the establishment of the Phase I some spacecraft, including Tsikada and Russia continues to develop its space programs, constellation in 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Astronaut Describes Close Call Following Failed Launch 16 October 2018, by Marcia Dunn
    NASA astronaut describes close call following failed launch 16 October 2018, by Marcia Dunn It was the first aborted launch for the Russians in 35 years and only the third in history. Like each one before, the rocket's safety system kept the crew alive. Hague—the first American to experience a launch abort like this—communicated in Russian throughout the more than half-hour ordeal. "All of my instincts and reflexes inside the capsule are to speak Russian," said Hague, who had two years of training in Russia. "We knew that if we wanted to be successful, we In this frame from video from NASA TV, NASA astronaut needed to stay calm and we needed to execute the Nick Hague, who survived the Oct. 11, 2018, failed procedures in front of us as smoothly and efficiently launch and emergency landing, speaks Tuesday, Oct. as we could," Hague told The Associated Press 16, 2018, from the NASA Johnson Space Center in from Houston. Houston. Hague and Russian Alexei Ovchinin were two minutes into their flight last Thursday from Kazakhstan to the International Space Station when the Soyuz rocket The astronauts experienced a few moments of failed. (NASA TV via AP) weightlessness after their Soyuz capsule catapulted away from the rocket. Hague, making his first launch, saw the curvature of Earth and the blackness of space. The NASA astronaut who survived last week's failed launch and emergency landing knew he Between the abort and touchdown, Hague looked needed to stay calm. out the window to make sure the capsule's systems were operating properly and to check their landing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Flight Plan
    M A R C H 2 0 2 1 THE FLIGHT PLAN The Newsletter of AIAA Albuquerque Section The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics AIAA ALBUQUERQUE MARCH 2021 SECTION MEETING: MAKING A DIFFERENCE A T M A C H 2 . Presenter. Lt. Col. Tucker Hamilton Organization USAF F-35 Developmental Test Director of Operations INSIDE THIS ISSUE: Abstract I humbly present my flying experiences through SECTION CALENDAR 2 pictures and videos of what it takes and what it is like to be an Experimental Fighter Test Pilot. My personal stories include NATIONAL AIAA EVENTS 2 major life-threatening aircraft accidents, close saves, combat SPACE NUCLEAR PROPULSION REPORT 3 flying revelations, serendipitous opportunities testing first of its kind technology, flying over 30 aircraft from a zeppelin to a ALBUQUERQUE DECEMBER MEETING 5 MiG-15 to an A-10, and managing the Joint Strike Fighter De- velopmental Test program for all three services. Through ALBUQUERQUE JANUARY MEETING 6 these experiences you will learn not just what a Test Pilot does, but also gain encour- ALBUQUERQUE FEBRUARY MEETING 7 agement through my lessons learned on how to make a difference in your local com- munities…did I mention cool flight test videos! CALL FOR SCIENCE FAIR JUDGES 9 Lt Col Tucker "Cinco" Hamilton started his Air Force career as an CALL FOR SCHOLARSHIP APPLICATIONS 10 operational F-15C pilot. He supported multiple Red Flag Exercises and real world Operation Noble Eagle missions where he protect- NEW AIAA HIGH SCHOOL MEMBERSHIPS 10 ed the President of the United States; at times escorting Air Force One.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Launchers Between Commerce and Geopolitics
    The European Launchers between Commerce and Geopolitics Report 56 March 2016 Marco Aliberti Matteo Tugnoli Short title: ESPI Report 56 ISSN: 2218-0931 (print), 2076-6688 (online) Published in March 2016 Editor and publisher: European Space Policy Institute, ESPI Schwarzenbergplatz 6 • 1030 Vienna • Austria http://www.espi.or.at Tel. +43 1 7181118-0; Fax -99 Rights reserved – No part of this report may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or for any purpose with- out permission from ESPI. Citations and extracts to be published by other means are subject to mentioning “Source: ESPI Report 56; March 2016. All rights reserved” and sample transmission to ESPI before publishing. ESPI is not responsible for any losses, injury or damage caused to any person or property (including under contract, by negligence, product liability or otherwise) whether they may be direct or indirect, special, inciden- tal or consequential, resulting from the information contained in this publication. Design: Panthera.cc ESPI Report 56 2 March 2016 The European Launchers between Commerce and Geopolitics Table of Contents Executive Summary 5 1. Introduction 10 1.1 Access to Space at the Nexus of Commerce and Geopolitics 10 1.2 Objectives of the Report 12 1.3 Methodology and Structure 12 2. Access to Space in Europe 14 2.1 European Launchers: from Political Autonomy to Market Dominance 14 2.1.1 The Quest for European Independent Access to Space 14 2.1.3 European Launchers: the Current Family 16 2.1.3 The Working System: Launcher Strategy, Development and Exploitation 19 2.2 Preparing for the Future: the 2014 ESA Ministerial Council 22 2.2.1 The Path to the Ministerial 22 2.2.2 A Look at Europe’s Future Launchers and Infrastructure 26 2.2.3 A Revolution in Governance 30 3.
    [Show full text]
  • US-Russian Crew Blasts Off to International Space Station 14 March 2019, by Vladimir Isachenkov and Dmitry Lovetsky
    US-Russian crew blasts off to International Space Station 14 March 2019, by Vladimir Isachenkov And Dmitry Lovetsky On Oct. 11, a Soyuz that Hague and Ovchinin were riding in failed two minutes into its flight, activating a rescue system that allowed their capsule to land safely. That accident was the first aborted crew launch for the Russian space program since 1983, when two Soviet cosmonauts safely jettisoned after a launch pad explosion. NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine congratulated the crew on a successful launch. "So proud of Nick Hague for persevering through last October's launch that didn't go as planned," he tweeted. Speaking at a pre-launch news conference at Baikonur, the crew said they trusted the rocket and U.S. astronauts Christina Hammock Koch, centre, Nick fully believed in the success of their mission. Hague, above, and Russian cosmonaut Alexey Ovchinin, crew members of the mission to the International Space Station, ISS, wave as they board to the rocket prior the launch of Soyuz-FG rocket at the Russian leased Baikonur cosmodrome, Kazakhstan, Thursday, March 14, 2019. (AP Photo/Kyrill Kudryavtsev, Pool) A Russian-American crew of three blasted off to the International Space Station early Friday, making a second attempt to reach the outpost after October's aborted launch. A Russian Soyuz rocket carrying NASA astronauts U.S. astronauts Christina Hammock Koch, left, Nick Nick Hague and Christina Koch along with Hague, right, and Russian cosmonaut Alexey Ovchinin, Roscosmos' Alexei Ovchinin lifted off as planned members of the main crew to the International Space from the Baikonur cosmodrome in Kazakhstan at Station (ISS), pose near a bus prior to the launch of the 12:14 a.m.
    [Show full text]