Freshwater Fish Stocking in NSW Environmental Impact Statement

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Freshwater Fish Stocking in NSW Environmental Impact Statement Freshwater Fish Stocking in NSW Environmental Impact Statement Public Consultation Document Published in November 2003 by NSW Fisheries Cronulla Fisheries Centre PO Box 21 Cronulla NSW 2230 Details of the public consultation process and contact information are included on page 18 of Chapter A Environmental Impact Statement on Freshwater Fish Stocking in NSW Public Consultation Document NSW Fisheries, November 2003 ISBN 0 7310 9429 8 Copyright © 2003 NSW Fisheries Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Australian Copyright Act, no part of this publication may be reproduced by any process without written permission from NSW Fisheries. Inquiries should be addressed to NSW Fisheries. Disclaimer: This document is for discussion and comment only and does not commit the New South Wales Government to the views expressed or to any future action. While this publication has been prepared with care, the New South Wales Government does not accept liability for any decisions taken on the basis of this document. Cover images of golden perch fry and impoundment stocking by J Matthews Environmental Impact Statement on Freshwater Fish Stocking in NSW iii DECLARATION For the purpose of section 115K(4) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the Director-General, NSW Fisheries is the person engaged as responsible for the preparation of this Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The Director-General, NSW Fisheries is Mr Steve Dunn, B.Sc. Hons Fishery Science (Plymouth), Master of Management (Macquarie). A range of NSW Fisheries staff and stakeholders with expertise and qualifications in fisheries management, environmental science, fisheries science and fisheries compliance assisted in the preparation of the EIS. Where expertise was not available within NSW Fisheries, external experts were contracted. The EIS has been prepared on behalf of NSW Fisheries (the proponent). The address for the Director-General, NSW Fisheries, is: C/o NSW Fisheries Cronulla Fisheries Centre PO Box 21 CRONULLA NSW 2230 The location of the proposed activity is described in Chapter D. A description of the proposed activity and proposed controls is also provided in Chapter D. An assessment of the environmental impact of the proposed activity as described in the draft Fishery Management Strategy (Chapter D) is presented in the EIS in Chapter E. The EIS contains all available information relevant to the environmental assessment of the activity to which the statement relates. The information provided in the EIS is neither knowingly false nor misleading. Public Consultation Document, November 2003 iv Environmental Impact Statement on Freshwater Fish Stocking in NSW VOLUME TABLE OF CONTENTS Volume 1 Chapter A Executive Summary Chapter B Review of the Existing Activity of Fish Stocking Volume 2 Chapter C Consideration of Alternative Management Options Chapter D The Draft Fishery Management Strategy for the Activity Chapter E Assessment of the Implications of the Draft FMS Chapter F Justification for the Draft FMS Chapter G References Volume 3 (Appendices) Appendix A1 Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources’ Guidelines for the Environmental Impact Assessment of the Draft Fishery Management Strategy for Fish Stocking Appendix B1 Freshwater stocking records of the NSW Fisheries database Appendix B2 Socio-economic surveys conducted by Dominion Consulting Appendix B3 NSW Fish Stocking Strategy: Assessment of Indigenous and Historic Cultural Heritage Issues (Umwelt [Australia] Pty Ltd) Public Consultation Document, November 2003 Environmental Impact Statement on Freshwater Fish Stocking in NSW v CONTENTS AT A GLANCE Volume 1 Table of Contents ...............................................................................................................................vi List of Tables.....................................................................................................................................xii List of Figures.................................................................................................................................... xv Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................................xvi Membership on Advisory Boards....................................................................................................xvii Abbreviations .................................................................................................................................xviii Glossary.............................................................................................................................................xx CHAPTER A - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................1 CHAPTER B - REVIEW OF THE EXISTING ACTIVITY OF FISH STOCKING............................19 Overview ...........................................................................................................................................19 B1 The Stocking Activity and its Current Management .............................................................20 B2 Environmental Risks of the Current Activity ......................................................................107 B3 Economic Issues ..................................................................................................................215 B4 Social Issues ........................................................................................................................236 B5 Aboriginal and Cultural Heritage Issues..............................................................................244 Volume 2 CHAPTER C CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVE MANAGEMENT OPTIONS ..............255 C1 Alternate Goals and Objectives of the Draft FMS...............................................................255 C2 Alternate Activity of Fish Stocking.....................................................................................260 C3 Management Measures Proposed in the Draft FMS............................................................264 C4 Performance Reporting and Monitoring..............................................................................267 CHAPTER D THE DRAFT FISHERY MANAGEMENT STRATEGY FOR THE ACTIVITY.269 D1 Introduction to the Activity of Fish Stocking......................................................................269 D2 Vision and Goals for the Activity........................................................................................277 D3 Designated Stocking Activity..............................................................................................278 D4 Goals, Objectives and Management Responses ..................................................................303 D5 Performance Monitoring and Review..................................................................................324 Appendices to the FMS ...................................................................................................................334 CHAPTER E ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE DRAFT FMS......................361 E1 Implications of the Draft FMS for Threatened or Protected Species ..................................361 E2 Implications of the Draft FMS for Fauna not Currently Listed as Threatened....................369 E3 Implications of the Draft FMS for Areas of Conservation Significance .............................371 E4 Implications of the Draft FMS for Wild Populations ..........................................................374 E5 Implications of the Draft FMS for Fish Health ...................................................................380 E6 Economic Implications of the Draft FMS ...........................................................................381 E7 Social Implications of the Draft FMS..................................................................................392 E8 Implications of the Draft FMS for Aboriginal Culture........................................................397 E9 Implications of the Draft FMS for Sites of Historic, Heritage or Cultural Significance.....402 CHAPTER F JUSTIFICATION FOR THE DRAFT FMS............................................................403 F1 The Need for the Activity of Fish Stocking.........................................................................403 F2 Positive and Negative Aspects of Stocking Under the Draft FMS......................................406 F3 Outline of Key Management Provisions to Minimise Risk.................................................414 F4 Justification for the Draft Strategy ......................................................................................417 CHAPTER G REFERENCES ........................................................................................................421 Public Consultation Document, November 2003 vi Environmental Impact Statement on Freshwater Fish Stocking in NSW Table of Contents Volume 1 Table of Contents................................................................................................................................vi List of Tables .................................................................................................................................... xii List of Figures....................................................................................................................................xv Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................................xvi
Recommended publications
  • 2016-2017 Native Fish Stocking Plan for Dams and Lakes
    2016/2017 NATIVE FISH STOCKING PLAN FOR DAMS AND LAKES There are many impoundments and reservoirs suitable for native fish stocking throughout NSW and over the last two decades a large number of excellent recreational fisheries have been established. To ensure that the best use continues to be made of publicly funded fish stocking programs, Department of Primary Industries (DPI) is seeking input from people who have an interest in the State’s stocked native freshwater fisheries. The attached draft native fish stocking plan has been prepared for consideration by the recreational fishing community. Fish are stocked from Government hatcheries as a service to the anglers of NSW. Locations are selected based on recent stocking history and experience with those waters. The plan is also developed in accordance with the policies and guidelines set out in the Environmental Impact Statement and Fishery Management Strategy (FMS) on freshwater fish stocking in NSW. The water quality and storage status of impoundments will also be assessed prior to stocking and where necessary changes will be made. Please note: Planned fish release figures listed in the attached tables are targets only, and may be exceeded, or not attained, depending on hatchery production. Other seasonal factors such as water quality issues or unforeseen circumstances could preclude planned fish releases. As a result, allocations may be amended prior to release. Impoundments are listed as Priority 1 or 2. Priority 1 impoundments support large recreational fisheries or have not received stockings in recent years. Priority 2 impoundments are either smaller fisheries, suffer intermittent water quality issues or have recently received large stockings of that species.
    [Show full text]
  • A Global Assessment of Parasite Diversity in Galaxiid Fishes
    diversity Article A Global Assessment of Parasite Diversity in Galaxiid Fishes Rachel A. Paterson 1,*, Gustavo P. Viozzi 2, Carlos A. Rauque 2, Verónica R. Flores 2 and Robert Poulin 3 1 The Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, P.O. Box 5685, Torgarden, 7485 Trondheim, Norway 2 Laboratorio de Parasitología, INIBIOMA, CONICET—Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Quintral 1250, San Carlos de Bariloche 8400, Argentina; [email protected] (G.P.V.); [email protected] (C.A.R.); veronicaroxanafl[email protected] (V.R.F.) 3 Department of Zoology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +47-481-37-867 Abstract: Free-living species often receive greater conservation attention than the parasites they support, with parasite conservation often being hindered by a lack of parasite biodiversity knowl- edge. This study aimed to determine the current state of knowledge regarding parasites of the Southern Hemisphere freshwater fish family Galaxiidae, in order to identify knowledge gaps to focus future research attention. Specifically, we assessed how galaxiid–parasite knowledge differs among geographic regions in relation to research effort (i.e., number of studies or fish individuals examined, extent of tissue examination, taxonomic resolution), in addition to ecological traits known to influ- ence parasite richness. To date, ~50% of galaxiid species have been examined for parasites, though the majority of studies have focused on single parasite taxa rather than assessing the full diversity of macro- and microparasites. The highest number of parasites were observed from Argentinean galaxiids, and studies in all geographic regions were biased towards the highly abundant and most widely distributed galaxiid species, Galaxias maculatus.
    [Show full text]
  • Murrumbidgee Regional Fact Sheet
    Murrumbidgee region Overview The Murrumbidgee region is home The river and national parks provide to about 550,000 people and covers ideal spots for swimming, fishing, 84,000 km2 – 8% of the Murray– bushwalking, camping and bird Darling Basin. watching. Dryland cropping, grazing and The Murrumbidgee River provides irrigated agriculture are important a critical water supply to several industries, with 42% of NSW grapes regional centres and towns including and 50% of Australia’s rice grown in Canberra, Gundagai, Wagga Wagga, the region. Narrandera, Leeton, Griffith, Hay and Balranald. The region’s villages Chicken production employs such as Goolgowi, Merriwagga and 350 people in the area, aquaculture Carrathool use aquifers and deep allows the production of Murray bores as their potable supply. cod and cotton has also been grown since 2010. Image: Murrumbidgee River at Wagga Wagga, NSW Carnarvon N.P. r e v i r e R iv e R v i o g N re r r e a v i W R o l g n Augathella a L r e v i R d r a W Chesterton Range N.P. Charleville Mitchell Morven Roma Cheepie Miles River Chinchilla amine Cond Condamine k e e r r ve C i R l M e a nn a h lo Dalby c r a Surat a B e n e o B a Wyandra R Tara i v e r QUEENSLAND Brisbane Toowoomba Moonie Thrushton er National e Riv ooni Park M k Beardmore Reservoir Millmerran e r e ve r i R C ir e e St George W n i Allora b e Bollon N r e Jack Taylor Weir iv R Cunnamulla e n n N lo k a e B Warwick e r C Inglewood a l a l l a g n u Coolmunda Reservoir M N acintyre River Goondiwindi 25 Dirranbandi M Stanthorpe 0 50 Currawinya N.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Potential of Four Freshwater Prawn Species in the Amazon Region
    Invertebrate Reproduction & Development ISSN: 0792-4259 (Print) 2157-0272 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tinv20 Reproductive potential of four freshwater prawn species in the Amazon region Leo Jaime Filgueira de Oliveira, Bruno Sampaio Sant’Anna & Gustavo Yomar Hattori To cite this article: Leo Jaime Filgueira de Oliveira, Bruno Sampaio Sant’Anna & Gustavo Yomar Hattori (2017) Reproductive potential of four freshwater prawn species in the Amazon region, Invertebrate Reproduction & Development, 61:4, 290-296, DOI: 10.1080/07924259.2017.1365099 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/07924259.2017.1365099 Published online: 21 Aug 2017. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 43 View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tinv20 INVERTEBRATE REPRODUCTION & DEVELOPMENT, 2017 VOL. 61, NO. 4, 290–296 https://doi.org/10.1080/07924259.2017.1365099 Reproductive potential of four freshwater prawn species in the Amazon region Leo Jaime Filgueira de Oliveira†, Bruno Sampaio Sant’Anna and Gustavo Yomar Hattori Instituto de Ciências Exatas e Tecnologia (ICET), Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM), Itacoatiara, Brazil ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY The bioecology of freshwater prawns can be understood by studying their reproductive biology. Received 1 June 2017 Thus, the aim of this paper was to determine and compare the reproductive potential of four Accepted 4 August 2017 freshwater caridean prawns collected in the Amazon region. For two years, we captured females KEYWORDS of Macrobrachium brasiliense, Palaemon carteri, Pseudopalaemon chryseus and Euryrhynchus Caridea; Euryrhynchidae; amazoniensis from inland streams in the municipality of Itacoatiara (AM).
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests?
    Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests? An Analysis of the State of the Nation’s Regional Forest Agreements Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests? An Analysis of the State of the Nation’s Regional Forest Agreements The Wilderness Society. 2020, Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests? The State of the Nation’s RFAs, The Wilderness Society, Melbourne, Australia Table of contents 4 Executive summary Printed on 100% recycled post-consumer waste paper 5 Key findings 6 Recommendations Copyright The Wilderness Society Ltd 7 List of abbreviations All material presented in this publication is protected by copyright. 8 Introduction First published September 2020. 9 1. Background and legal status 12 2. Success of the RFAs in achieving key outcomes Contact: [email protected] | 1800 030 641 | www.wilderness.org.au 12 2.1 Comprehensive, Adequate, Representative Reserve system 13 2.1.1 Design of the CAR Reserve System Cover image: Yarra Ranges, Victoria | mitchgreenphotos.com 14 2.1.2 Implementation of the CAR Reserve System 15 2.1.3 Management of the CAR Reserve System 16 2.2 Ecologically Sustainable Forest Management 16 2.2.1 Maintaining biodiversity 20 2.2.2 Contributing factors to biodiversity decline 21 2.3 Security for industry 22 2.3.1 Volume of logs harvested 25 2.3.2 Employment 25 2.3.3 Growth in the plantation sector of Australia’s wood products industry 27 2.3.4 Factors contributing to industry decline 28 2.4 Regard to relevant research and projects 28 2.5 Reviews 32 3. Ability of the RFAs to meet intended outcomes into the future 32 3.1 Climate change 32 3.1.1 The role of forests in climate change mitigation 32 3.1.2 Climate change impacts on conservation and native forestry 33 3.2 Biodiversity loss/resource decline 33 3.2.1 Altered fire regimes 34 3.2.2 Disease 35 3.2.3 Pest species 35 3.3 Competing forest uses and values 35 3.3.1 Water 35 3.3.2 Carbon credits 36 3.4 Changing industries, markets and societies 36 3.5 International and national agreements 37 3.6 Legal concerns 37 3.7 Findings 38 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Border Rivers Community Profile: Irrigation Region
    Border Rivers community profile Irrigation region Key issues for the region 1. Region’s population — the population of the Border Rivers region is approximately 49,646, and the ABS records around 570 irrigating agricultural businesses. 2. Gross value of irrigated agricultural production ­­— the drought affected gross value of irrigated agricultural production for 2006 in the Border Rivers was $350million. 3. Water entitlements (approximate) • Surface Water Long-term Cap (long-term average annual extraction volume) 399 GL, to be shared between NSW and Queensland. • High Security — 1 GL (NSW). • General Security 265 GL (NSW). • Supplementary licences 120 GL (NSW). • Groundwater entitlements — nominal volume 7 GL (Queensland). • Surface water entitlements upper reaches (unsupplemented) — nominal volume 21 GL (Queensland). • Surface water entitlements in the lower reaches (supplemented) nominal volume 102 GL (Queensland). • Surface water entitlements in the lower reaches (unsupplemented) — nominal volume 210 GL (Queensland). 4. Major enterprises — broadacre furrow irrigation, principally cotton, is the major irrigated enterprise, with cereal crops, fodder crops, fruit and vegetables also grown in different parts of the catchment. 5. Government Buyback — the Commonwealth Government’s buyback in the region has been 7 GL so far. 6. Water dependence — The Border Rivers is highly dependent on water, because agriculture, particularly irrigated agriculture, is a major driver in the economies of Goondiwindi, Stanthorpe and several smaller towns. 7. Current status • The Border Rivers is an agricultural region with several large towns, notably Inverell, Glen Innes, Goondiwindi, Stanthorpe and Tenterfield, with relatively diverse economies. Of these, Goondiwindi and Stanthorpe are more irrigation dependent towns likely to be affected significantly by any move to lower sustainable diversion limits.
    [Show full text]
  • Rivers and Streams Special Investigation Final Recommendations
    LAND CONSERVATION COUNCIL RIVERS AND STREAMS SPECIAL INVESTIGATION FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS June 1991 This text is a facsimile of the former Land Conservation Council’s Rivers and Streams Special Investigation Final Recommendations. It has been edited to incorporate Government decisions on the recommendations made by Order in Council dated 7 July 1992, and subsequent formal amendments. Added text is shown underlined; deleted text is shown struck through. Annotations [in brackets] explain the origins of the changes. MEMBERS OF THE LAND CONSERVATION COUNCIL D.H.F. Scott, B.A. (Chairman) R.W. Campbell, B.Vet.Sc., M.B.A.; Director - Natural Resource Systems, Department of Conservation and Environment (Deputy Chairman) D.M. Calder, M.Sc., Ph.D., M.I.Biol. W.A. Chamley, B.Sc., D.Phil.; Director - Fisheries Management, Department of Conservation and Environment S.M. Ferguson, M.B.E. M.D.A. Gregson, E.D., M.A.F., Aus.I.M.M.; General Manager - Minerals, Department of Manufacturing and Industry Development A.E.K. Hingston, B.Behav.Sc., M.Env.Stud., Cert.Hort. P. Jerome, B.A., Dip.T.R.P., M.A.; Director - Regional Planning, Department of Planning and Housing M.N. Kinsella, B.Ag.Sc., M.Sci., F.A.I.A.S.; Manager - Quarantine and Inspection Services, Department of Agriculture K.J. Langford, B.Eng.(Ag)., Ph.D , General Manager - Rural Water Commission R.D. Malcolmson, M.B.E., B.Sc., F.A.I.M., M.I.P.M.A., M.Inst.P., M.A.I.P. D.S. Saunders, B.Agr.Sc., M.A.I.A.S.; Director - National Parks and Public Land, Department of Conservation and Environment K.J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology and Prospectivity of the Tallangatta 1:250 000 Sheet
    VIMP Report 10 The geology and prospectivity of the Tallangatta 1:250 000 sheet I.D. Oppy, R.A. Cayley & J. Caluzzi November 1995 Bibliographic reference: OPPY, I.D., CAYLEY R.A. & CALUZZI, J., 1995. The Geology and prospectivity of the Tallangatta 1:250 000 sheet Victorian Initiative for Minerals and Petroleum Report 10. Department of Agriculture, Energy and Minerals. © Crown (State of Victoria) Copyright 1995 Geological Survey of Victoria ISSN 1323 4536 ISBN 0 7306 7980 2 This report may be purchased from: Business Centre, Department of Agriculture, Energy & Minerals, Ground Floor, 115 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy, Victoria 3065 For further technical information contact: General Manager, Geological Survey of Victoria, Department of Agriculture, Energy & Minerals, P O Box 2145, MDC Fitzroy, Victoria 3065 Acknowledgments: The authors wish to acknowledge G. Ellis for formatting the document, R. Buckley, P.J. O'Shea and D.H. Taylor for editing and S. Heeps for cartography I. Oppy wrote chapters 3 and 5, R. Cayley wrote chapter 2 and J. Caluzzi wrote chapter 4. GEOLOGY AND PROSPECTIVITY - TALLANGATTA 1 Contents Abstract 4 1 Introduction 5 2 Geology 7 2.1 Geological history 7 Pre-Ordovician to Early Silurian 7 Early Silurian Benambran deformation and widespread granite intrusion 8 Middle to Late Silurian 9 Late Silurian Bindian deformation 9 Early Devonian rifting and volcanism 10 Middle Devonian Tabberabberan deformation 11 Late Devonian sedimentation and volcanism 11 Early Carboniferous Kanimblan deformation to Present day 11 2.2 Stratigraphy
    [Show full text]
  • Talk Wild Trout Conference Proceedings 2015
    Talk Wild Trout 2015 Conference Proceedings 21 November 2015 Mansfield Performing Arts Centre, Mansfield Victoria Partners: Fisheries Victoria Editors: Taylor Hunt, John Douglas and Anthony Forster, Freshwater Fisheries Management, Fisheries Victoria Contact email: [email protected] Preferred way to cite this publication: ‘Hunt, T.L., Douglas, J, & Forster, A (eds) 2015, Talk Wild Trout 2015: Conference Proceedings, Fisheries Victoria, Department of Economic Development Jobs Transport and Resources, Queenscliff.’ Acknowledgements: The Victorian Trout Fisher Reference Group, Victorian Recreational Fishing Grants Working Group, VRFish, Mansfield and District Fly Fishers, Australian Trout Foundation, The Council of Victorian Fly Fishing Clubs, Mansfield Shire Council, Arthur Rylah Institute, University of Melbourne, FlyStream, Philip Weigall, Marc Ainsworth, Vicki Griffin, Jarod Lyon, Mark Turner, Amber Clarke, Andrew Briggs, Dallas D’Silva, Rob Loats, Travis Dowling, Kylie Hall, Ewan McLean, Neil Hyatt, Damien Bridgeman, Paul Petraitis, Hui King Ho, Stephen Lavelle, Corey Green, Duncan Hill and Emma Young. Project Leaders and chapter contributors: Jason Lieschke, Andrew Pickworth, John Mahoney, Justin O’Connor, Canran Liu, John Morrongiello, Diane Crowther, Phil Papas, Mark Turner, Amber Clarke, Brett Ingram, Fletcher Warren-Myers, Kylie Hall and Khageswor Giri.’ Authorised by the Victorian Government Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport & Resources (DEDJTR), 1 Spring Street Melbourne Victoria 3000. November 2015
    [Show full text]
  • Palaemonidae, Macrobrachium, New Species, Anchia- Line Cave, Miyako Island, Ryukyu Islands
    Zootaxa 1021: 13–27 (2005) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA 1021 Copyright © 2005 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) A new stygiobiont species of Macrobrachium (Crustacea: Deca- poda: Caridea: Palaemonidae) from an anchialine cave on Miyako Island, Ryukyu Islands TOMOYUKI KOMAI1 & YOSHIHISA FUJITA2 1 Natural History Museum and Institute, Chiba, 955-2 Aoba-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-8682 Japan ([email protected]) 2 University Education Center, University of the Ryukyus, 1 Senbaru, Nishihara-cho, Okinawa, 903-0213 Japan ([email protected]) Abstract A new stygiobiont species of the caridean genus Macrobrachium Bate, 1864 is described on the basis of two male specimens from an anchialine cave on Miyako Island, southern Ryukyu Islands. The new species, M. miyakoense, is compared with other five stygiobiont species of the genus char- acterized by a reduced eye, i.e. M. cavernicola (Kemp, 1924), M. villalobosi Hobbs, 1973, M. acherontium Holthuis, 1977, M. microps Holthuis, 1978, and M. poeti Holthuis, 1984. It is the first representative of stygiobiont species of Macrobrachium from East Asian waters. Key words: Crustacea, Decapoda, Caridea, Palaemonidae, Macrobrachium, new species, anchia- line cave, Miyako Island, Ryukyu Islands Introduction There are few stygiobiont species of the palaemonid genus Macrobrachium Bate, 1864 in the world, although the genus is one of the most speciose caridean genera, abundant in tropical fresh waters (Chace & Bruce, 1993). Holthuis (1986) listed six stygiobiont species of Macrobrachium, together with additional 12 stygiophile or stygoxene species. The six stygiobiont species are: M. cavernicola (Kemp, 1924) from Siju Cave in Assam, India (Kemp, 1924); M.
    [Show full text]
  • National Recovery Plan for the Stuttering Frog Mixophyes Balbus
    National Recovery Plan for the Stuttering Frog Mixophyes balbus David Hunter and Graeme Gillespie Prepared by David Hunter and Graeme Gillespie (Department of Sustainability and Environment, Victoria). Published by the Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE) Melbourne, October 2011. © State of Victoria Department of Sustainability and Environment 2010 This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Authorised by the Victorian Government, 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne. ISBN 978-1-74242-369-2 (online) This is a Recovery Plan prepared under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, with the assistance of funding provided by the Australian Government. This Recovery Plan has been developed with the involvement and cooperation of a range of stakeholders, but individual stakeholders have not necessarily committed to undertaking specific actions. The attainment of objectives and the provision of funds may be subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved. Proposed actions may be subject to modification over the life of the plan due to changes in knowledge. Disclaimer: This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence that may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. An electronic version of this document is available on the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts website www.environment.gov.au For more information contact the DSE Customer Service Centre 136 186 Citation: Hunter, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 7: Species Changing IUCN Red List Status (2018-2019)
    IUCN Red List version 2019-3: Table 7 Last Updated: 10 December 2019 Table 7: Species changing IUCN Red List Status (2018-2019) Published listings of a species' status may change for a variety of reasons (genuine improvement or deterioration in status; new information being available that was not known at the time of the previous assessment; taxonomic changes; corrections to mistakes made in previous assessments, etc. To help Red List users interpret the changes between the Red List updates, a summary of species that have changed category between 2018 (IUCN Red List version 2018-2) and 2019 (IUCN Red List version 2019-3) and the reasons for these changes is provided in the table below. IUCN Red List Categories: EX - Extinct, EW - Extinct in the Wild, CR - Critically Endangered [CR(PE) - Critically Endangered (Possibly Extinct), CR(PEW) - Critically Endangered (Possibly Extinct in the Wild)], EN - Endangered, VU - Vulnerable, LR/cd - Lower Risk/conservation dependent, NT - Near Threatened (includes LR/nt - Lower Risk/near threatened), DD - Data Deficient, LC - Least Concern (includes LR/lc - Lower Risk, least concern). Reasons for change: G - Genuine status change (genuine improvement or deterioration in the species' status); N - Non-genuine status change (i.e., status changes due to new information, improved knowledge of the criteria, incorrect data used previously, taxonomic revision, etc.); E - Previous listing was an Error. IUCN Red List IUCN Red Reason for Red List Scientific name Common name (2018) List (2019) change version Category
    [Show full text]