World Bank Document
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
RUSSIA: "Extremism" Charges for Possessing Muslim Books, Jehovah's Witness Community Ban Confirmed
FORUM 18 NEWS SERVICE, Oslo, Norway http://www.forum18.org/ The right to believe, to worship and witness The right to change one's belief or religion The right to join together and express one's belief 20 November 2014 RUSSIA: "Extremism" charges for possessing Muslim books, Jehovah's Witness community ban confirmed By Victoria Arnold, Forum 18 News Service The criminal trial of six Russian Muslims accused of "extremism" for alleged involvement in "Nurdzhular", an organisation which Muslims deny exists, began in Perm on 16 October, Forum 18 News Service has learnt. Two women facing the same charges in Krasnoyarsk will go on trial on 27 November, and another man in Rostov-on-Don is likely to be tried soon after. Four more people are soon to be brought to court on similar charges. Another Muslim from Perm, who reads the works of the late Turkish Muslim theologian Said Nursi, was given a suspended prison sentence in June. Also, the Jehovah's Witness community in Samara - forcibly liquidated on charges of "extremism" - has been unable to overturn the liquidation ruling on 12 November in the Supreme Court. In Taganrog a similar 2009 liquidation also upheld by the Supreme Court has been used to justify banning all Jehovah's Witness activity. Subsequently, seven Jehovah's Witnesses were found guilty of "extremism" in August 2014 for continuing to meet together for prayer and Bible study. The criminal trial of six men accused of "extremism" for alleged involvement in "Nurdzhular", an organisation which Muslims in Russia deny exists, began in the Urals city of Perm on 16 October, Forum 18 News Service has learnt. -
Diatomic Compounds in the Soils of Bee-Farm and Nearby Territories in Samarskaya Oblast
BIO Web of Conferences 27, 00036 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20202700036 FIES 2020 Diatomic compounds in the soils of bee-farm and nearby territories in Samarskaya oblast N.Ye. Zemskova1,*, A.I. Fazlutdinova2, V.N. Sattarov2 and L.M. Safiullinа2 1Samara State Agrarian University, Ust-Kinelskiy, Samarskaya oblast, 446442, Russia 2Bashkir State Pedagogical University n.a. M. Akmulla, Ufa, 450008, Russia Abstract. This article sheds light on the role diatomic algae in soils play in the assessment of bee farm and nearby territories in four soil and landscape zones in Samarskaya Oblast. The community of diatomic algae is characterized by low species diversity, of which 23 taxons were found. The most often found species are represented by Hantzschia amphioxys (Ehrenberg) Grunow in Cleve & Grunow and Luticola mutica (Kützing) D.G.Mann in Round et al. The maximum of phyla (18) were found in the buffer (transient) zone; in the wooded steppe zone, 11 species were recorded; in the steppe – 2 species, and in the dry steppe zone no species of diatomic algae were found. The qualitative and quantitative characteristics of diatomic algae communities in various biotopes depend on the natural and climate features of a territory and the degree of the anthropogenic impact on the soil and vegetation, which is proved by the fact that high species wealth signifies that the ecosystem is stable and resilient to the changing conditions in the environment, while poor algal flora is less resilient due to the lower degree of diversity. 1 Introduction Diatomic algae play a special role in habitats with extreme conditions [6, 7]. -
GCPMED 2018 International Scientific Conference "Global Challenges and Prospects of the Modern Economic Development"
The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences EpSBS Future Academy ISSN: 2357-1330 https://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.03.164 GCPMED 2018 International Scientific Conference "Global Challenges and Prospects of the Modern Economic Development" EVOLUTION OF INDUSTRIAL COMPLEXES: FROM INDUSTRIAL PARKS TO SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PARKS V.M. Shepelev (a)*, A.A. Larkinа (a), I.V. Kosyakova (a), M.A. Gavrilova (a), O.A. Kulaeva (b) *Corresponding author (a) Samara State Technical University, ulitsa Molodogvardeyskaya, 244, Samara, 443090, Russia, [email protected] (b) Samara State Social-Pedagogical University, Maksima Gorkogo Str., 65/67, 443090, Samara, Russia, iv- [email protected] Abstract Nowadays the world economy is on the way to the sixth technological way to which continuous innovative process is peculiar. Each technological period forms a certain set of innovations directed to the sustained economic growth. In the developed countries from 40% to 90% of the growth of the gross domestic product is formed due to high technologies. For Russia, which is in the sphere of political and economic sanctions, one of the main forces in formation of sustainable development there have to be science and technology parks. Their main objective is creation and advance of scientific and technical business. Diversification and new technologies are very important for Russia which is in rather dense technological dependence on a number of foreign countries today. It is on the basis of the retrospective analysis of emergence and development of science and technology parks in country aspect, the qualitative analysis of changes of the comparative characteristic of the technological processes accompanying development of territorial and industrial complexes and creation of the knowledge-intensive competitive production. -
In Search of Happy Gypsies
Norway Artctic Ocean Sweden Finland Belarus Ukraine Pacifc Ocean RUSSIA In Search of Kazahstan China Japan Mongolia Happy Gypsies Persecution of Pariah Minorities in Russia COUNTRY REPORTS SERIES NO. 14 Moscow MAY 2005 A REPORT BY THE EUROPEAN ROMA RIGHTS CENTRE European Roma Rights Centre IN SEARCH OF HAPPY GYPSIES Persecution of Pariah Minorities in Russia Country Report Series, No. 14 May 2005 Table of Contents Copyright: © European Roma Rights Centre, May 2005 All rights reserved. ISBN 963 218 338 X ISSN 1416-7409 Graphic Design: Createch Ltd./Judit Kovács Printed in Budapest, Hungary. For information on reprint policy, please contact the ERRC 5 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements....................................................................................................7 1. Executive Summary.............................................................................................9 2. Introduction: Anti-Romani Racism....................................................................19 3. A Short History of Roma in Russia ...................................................................43 4. Racially-Motivated Violence and Abuse of Roma by Law Enforcement Officials..............................................................................................................55 4.1 Racial Profiling ..........................................................................................57 4.2 Arbitrary Detention....................................................................................61 4.3 Torture -
List of Cities in Russia
Population Population Sr.No City/town Federal subject (2002 (2010 Census (preliminary)) Census) 001 Moscow Moscow 10,382,754 11,514,330 002 Saint Petersburg Saint Petersburg 4,661,219 4,848,742 003 Novosibirsk Novosibirsk Oblast 1,425,508 1,473,737 004 Yekaterinburg Sverdlovsk Oblast 1,293,537 1,350,136 005 Nizhny Novgorod Nizhny Novgorod Oblast 1,311,252 1,250,615 006 Samara Samara Oblast 1,157,880 1,164,896 007 Omsk Omsk Oblast 1,134,016 1,153,971 008 Kazan Republic of Tatarstan 1,105,289 1,143,546 009 Chelyabinsk Chelyabinsk Oblast 1,077,174 1,130,273 010 Rostov-on-Don Rostov Oblast 1,068,267 1,089,851 011 Ufa Republic of Bashkortostan 1,042,437 1,062,300 012 Volgograd Volgograd Oblast 1,011,417 1,021,244 013 Perm Perm Krai 1,001,653 991,530 014 Krasnoyarsk Krasnoyarsk Krai 909,341 973,891 015 Voronezh Voronezh Oblast 848,752 889,989 016 Saratov Saratov Oblast 873,055 837,831 017 Krasnodar Krasnodar Krai 646,175 744,933 018 Tolyatti Samara Oblast 702,879 719,514 019 Izhevsk Udmurt Republic 632,140 628,116 020 Ulyanovsk Ulyanovsk Oblast 635,947 613,793 021 Barnaul Altai Krai 600,749 612,091 022 Vladivostok Primorsky Krai 594,701 592,069 023 Yaroslavl Yaroslavl Oblast 613,088 591,486 024 Irkutsk Irkutsk Oblast 593,604 587,225 025 Tyumen Tyumen Oblast 510,719 581,758 026 Makhachkala Republic of Dagestan 462,412 577,990 027 Khabarovsk Khabarovsk Krai 583,072 577,668 028 Novokuznetsk Kemerovo Oblast 549,870 547,885 029 Orenburg Orenburg Oblast 549,361 544,987 030 Kemerovo Kemerovo Oblast 484,754 532,884 031 Ryazan Ryazan Oblast 521,560 -
Typology of Russian Regions
TYPOLOGY OF RUSSIAN REGIONS Moscow, 2002 Authors: B. Boots, S. Drobyshevsky, O. Kochetkova, G. Malginov, V. Petrov, G. Fedorov, Al. Hecht, A. Shekhovtsov, A. Yudin The research and the publication were undertaken in the framework of CEPRA (Consortium for Economic Policy, Research and Advice) project funded by the Canadian Agency for International Development (CIDA). Page setting: A.Astakhov ISBN 5-93255-071-6 Publisher license ID # 02079 of June 19, 2000 5, Gazetny per., Moscow, 103918 Russia Tel. (095) 229–6413, FAX (095) 203–8816 E-MAIL – root @iet.ru, WEB Site – http://www.iet.ru Соntents Introduction.................................................................................................... 5 Chapter 1. Review of existing research papers on typology of Russian regions ........................................................................ 9 Chapter 2. Methodology of Multi-Dimensional Classification and Regional Typology in RF ................................................... 40 2.1. Tasks of Typology and Formal Tools for their Solution ................. 40 2.1.1. Problem Identification and Its Formalization .......................... 40 2.2. Features of Formal Tools ................................................................. 41 2.2.1. General approach .................................................................... 41 2.2.2. Characterization of clustering methods ................................... 43 2.2.3. Characterization of the methods of discriminative analysis ..... 45 2.3. Method for Economic Parameterisation.......................................... -
С. 103-114 Рефераты И Ключевые Слова 29.06.15
Abstracts of articles TECHNOLOGIES AND MECHANIZATION MEANS IN AGRICULTURE UDK 631.33.022.66 ASSESSMENT OF THE EXPIRATION ACTIVATOR INFLUENCE FOR PRODUCTIVITY OF THE DISK AND PIN SOWING DEVICE Savelyev Yu. A., dr. of techn. sciences, prof. of the department «Agricultural machines and mechanization of animal husband- ry», FSBEI HVE Samara SAA. 446442, Samara region, settlement Ust’-Kinelsky, Sportivnaya, 8-a str. E-mail: [email protected] Kryuchin N. P., dr. of techn. sciences, prof., head of the department «Mechanics and engineering graphics», FSBEI HVE Sama- ra SAA. 446442, Samara region, settlement Ust’-Kinelsky, Sportivnaya 8-a str. E-mail: [email protected] Kryuchin A. N., post-graduate student of the department «Agricultural machines and mechanization of animal husbandry», FSBEI HVE Samara SAA. 446442, Samara region, settlement Ust’-Kinelsky, Sportivnaya 8-a str. E-mail: [email protected] Keywords: productivity, seeds, disk-pin, meter, apparatus, activator. The aim of the research is increasing the performance of the sowing unit disk-pin through the use of the activator expiration of seed from the hopper. The most important device of any seeder is the sowing device. He has to create uniform stream of seed material with the set parameters. When dosing seeds of cereal herbs ensuring compliance with this condition is extremely diffi- cult. The special sowing device is developed for dispensing of seeds of a meadow grass and mix of herbs which part they are. Feature of this device is existence of the activator of the expiration of seed material from the bunker providing steady filling with space seeds on the dosing disk that allows to receive high quality indicators of seeding. -
Russian Federation. Facilitating International Market Access For
OCCASION This publication has been made available to the public on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the United Nations Industrial Development Organisation. DISCLAIMER This document has been produced without formal United Nations editing. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries, or its economic system or degree of development. Designations such as “developed”, “industrialized” and “developing” are intended for statistical convenience and do not necessarily express a judgment about the stage reached by a particular country or area in the development process. Mention of firm names or commercial products does not constitute an endorsement by UNIDO. FAIR USE POLICY Any part of this publication may be quoted and referenced for educational and research purposes without additional permission from UNIDO. However, those who make use of quoting and referencing this publication are requested to follow the Fair Use Policy of giving due credit to UNIDO. CONTACT Please contact [email protected] for further information concerning UNIDO publications. For more information about UNIDO, please visit us at www.unido.org UNITED NATIONS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION Vienna International Centre, P.O. Box -
Social and Behavioural Sciences Epsbs
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
Departure City City Of Delivery Region Delivery Delivery Time
Cost of Estimated Departure city city of delivery Region delivery delivery time Moscow Ababurovo Moscow 655 1 Moscow Abaza The Republic of Khakassia 1401 6 Moscow Abakan The Republic of Khakassia 722 2 Moscow Abbakumova Moscow region 655 1 Moscow Abdrakhmanovo Republic of Tatarstan 682 on request Moscow Abdreevo Ulyanovsk region 1360 5 Moscow Abdulov Ulyanovsk region 1360 5 Moscow Abinsk Krasnodar region 682 3 Moscow Abramovka Ulyanovsk region 1360 5 Moscow Abramovskikh Sverdlovsk region 1360 1 Moscow Abramtsevo Moscow region 655 1 Moscow Abramtzevo (Dmitrovsky reg) Moscow region 1360 3 Moscow Abrau Durso Krasnodar region 682 1 Moscow Avvakumova Tver region 655 5 Moscow Avdotyino Moscow region 655 1 Moscow Avdotyino (Stupinsky reg) Moscow region 1360 1 Averkieva Moscow Moscow region 1360 2 (Pavlovsky Posadskiy reg) Aviation workers Moscow Moscow region 1360 1 (Odintsovskiy-one) Moscow aviators Moscow region 655 1 Moscow Aviation Moscow region 655 1 Moscow Aviation Moscow region 655 1 Moscow Motorist Arhangelsk region 655 1 Moscow avtopoligone Moscow region 1360 3 Moscow Autoroute Moscow region 655 1 Moscow agarin Moscow region 655 1 Moscow Agarin (Stupinsky reg) Moscow region 1360 1 Moscow Agafonov Moscow region 655 1 Moscow AGAFONOVA (Odintsovskiy-one) Moscow region 1360 1 Moscow Agashkino Moscow region 655 5 Moscow Ageevka Oryol Region 655 1 Moscow Agidel Republic of Bashkortostan 1360 3 Moscow Agha Krasnodar region 682 3 Moscow Agrarnik Tver region 1306 6 Moscow agricultural Republic of Crimea 682 4 Moscow agrogorodok Moscow region -
All Sides Claim Victory in 1996 Gubernatorial Elections
ALL SIDES CLAIM VICTORY IN 1996 GUBERNATORIAL ELECTIONS Although they did not receive nearly as much international attention as the July presidential election, the 48 Russian regional elections held between 1 September and 5 January were closely watched by Russian politicians and commentators. Gubernatorial elections were held in 45 oblasts, krais, and autonomous okrugs, forcing leaders appointed by President Boris Yeltsin to face the voters. Three ethnic republics also elected top executives. Both the Kremlin and opposition leaders have portrayed the elections as a success, but many new governors have pledged to use their mandates to benefit their own regions, and it is difficult to predict where their primary loyalties will lie. Who are the new governors? Of the 48 incumbent regional leaders who faced elections in 1996, 20 held on to their jobs and 24 were defeated. Another three continue to serve pending repeat elections in their regions, and Tyumen Governor Leonid Roketskii will contest a runoff on 12 January. (A complete list of election results is attached to this issue of the Russian Regional Report.) Fifteen of the 24 new governors were elected mainly with the backing of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (KPRF) and its left-wing umbrella movement, the Popular-Patriotic Union of Russia (NPSR). Of the successful Communist-backed candidates, seven were chairmen of regional or local legislatures immediately before being elected governor (Krasnodar and Altai krais and Voronezh, Volgograd, Kaluga, Vladimir, and Kurgan oblasts). Four others were State Duma deputies (Kirov, Bryansk, and Chelyabinsk oblasts and Stavropol Krai), and one (Ryazan) worked in the parliament's Audit Chamber. -
Kuibyshev Reservoir, Russian Federation
water Article Shoreline Dynamics and Evaluation of Cultural Heritage Sites on the Shores of Large Reservoirs: Kuibyshev Reservoir, Russian Federation Ionut Cristi Nicu 1,* , Bulat Usmanov 2 , Iskander Gainullin 3 and Madina Galimova 3 1 High North Department, Norwegian Institute for Cultural Heritage Research (NIKU), Fram Centre, N-9296 Tromsø, Norway 2 Department of Landscape Ecology, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Kazan Federal University, 5 Tovarisheskaya Street, 420097 Kazan, Russia; [email protected] 3 Khalikov Institute of Archaeology, 30 Butlerova Street, 420012 Kazan, Russia; [email protected] (I.G.); [email protected] (M.G.) * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected]; Tel.: +47-98063607 Received: 15 February 2019; Accepted: 20 March 2019; Published: 21 March 2019 Abstract: Over the last decades, the number of artificial reservoirs around the world has considerably increased. This leads to the formation of new shorelines, which are highly dynamic regarding erosion and deposition processes. The present work aims to assess the direct human action along the largest reservoir in Europe—Kuibyshev (Russian Federation) and to analyse threatened cultural heritage sites from the coastal area, with the help of historical maps, UAV (unmanned aerial vehicle), and topographic surveys. This approach is a necessity, due to the oscillating water level, local change of climate, and to the continuous increasing of natural hazards (in this case coastal erosion) all over the world. Many studies are approaching coastal areas of the seas and oceans, yet there are fewer studies regarding the inland coastal areas of large artificial reservoirs. Out of the total number of 1289 cultural heritage sites around the Kuibyshev reservoir, only 90 sites are not affected by the dam building; the rest had completely disappeared under the reservoir’s water.