Dioxin Exposure and Public Health in Chapaevsk, Russia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
RUSSIA: "Extremism" Charges for Possessing Muslim Books, Jehovah's Witness Community Ban Confirmed
FORUM 18 NEWS SERVICE, Oslo, Norway http://www.forum18.org/ The right to believe, to worship and witness The right to change one's belief or religion The right to join together and express one's belief 20 November 2014 RUSSIA: "Extremism" charges for possessing Muslim books, Jehovah's Witness community ban confirmed By Victoria Arnold, Forum 18 News Service The criminal trial of six Russian Muslims accused of "extremism" for alleged involvement in "Nurdzhular", an organisation which Muslims deny exists, began in Perm on 16 October, Forum 18 News Service has learnt. Two women facing the same charges in Krasnoyarsk will go on trial on 27 November, and another man in Rostov-on-Don is likely to be tried soon after. Four more people are soon to be brought to court on similar charges. Another Muslim from Perm, who reads the works of the late Turkish Muslim theologian Said Nursi, was given a suspended prison sentence in June. Also, the Jehovah's Witness community in Samara - forcibly liquidated on charges of "extremism" - has been unable to overturn the liquidation ruling on 12 November in the Supreme Court. In Taganrog a similar 2009 liquidation also upheld by the Supreme Court has been used to justify banning all Jehovah's Witness activity. Subsequently, seven Jehovah's Witnesses were found guilty of "extremism" in August 2014 for continuing to meet together for prayer and Bible study. The criminal trial of six men accused of "extremism" for alleged involvement in "Nurdzhular", an organisation which Muslims in Russia deny exists, began in the Urals city of Perm on 16 October, Forum 18 News Service has learnt. -
Global Energy Company Company SCALE TECHNOLOGY RESPONSIBILITY
Global Energy Global Energy Company Company SCALE TECHNOLOGY RESPONSIBILITY Rosneft is the Russian oil Rosneft is the champion Rosneft is the biggest taxpayer Annual report 2013 industry champion and the of qualitative modernization in the Russian Federation. world’s biggest public oil and innovative change in the Active participation in the Annual report 2013 and gas company by proved Russian oil and gas industry. social life of the regions hydrocarbon reserves Proprietary solutions to of operations. and production. improve oil and synthetic Creating optimal conditions Unique portfolio of upstream liquid fuel production for professional development assets. performance. and high standards of social Leading positions for oshore Establishing R&D centers security and healthcare for development. in a partnership with global the employees. Growing role in the Asia- leaders in technology Unprecedented program Pacific markets. development and application. for land remediation. ROSNEFT Scale Technology Annual report online: www.rosneft.ru Responsibility www.rosneft.com/attach/0/58/80/a_report_2013_eng.pdf OUR RECORD ACHIEVEMENTS 551 RUB BLN RECORD NET INCOME +51% Page 136 4,694 RUB BLN RECORD REVENUES +52% Page 136 85 4 ,873 RUB BLN KBOED RECORD DIVIDENDS RECORD HYDROCARBONS PAID IN 2013 PRODUCTION +80.3%* Page 124 Page 28 90.1 42.1 MLN TONS* BCM** RECORD OIL GAS PRODUCTION, REFINING VOLUMES RUSSIA’s third largesT References to Rosneft Oil Company, Rosneft, or GAS PRODUCER the Company are to either Rosneft Oil Company or Rosneft Oil Company, its subsidiaries and affil- +46% iates, as the context may require. References to * TNK-BP assets accounted for from the date TNK-BP, TNK-BP company are to TNK-BP Group. -
Monitoring the Effectiveness of Youth Participation in Project Citizen A
Monitoring the Effectiveness of Youth Participation in Project Citizen A Civitas-Russia Evaluation Project Summary of Preliminary Findings June 2005 Background In November 2002, Civitas-Russia began a monitoring initiative to evaluate the effectiveness of youth participation in the Russian variation of Project Citizen entitled “I am a Citizen of Russia.” We decided to focus this monitoring initiative in Samara where Project Citizen has been underway since 1998. In Samara, there is a civics curriculum for all grade levels designed to provide an integrated approach to pupil learning of the values, skills and knowledge required of citizens in a democratic society. The Samara educational system has incorporated the social project approach in general and Project Citizen in particular as one strategy for advancing its civic learning goals. The purpose of this monitoring initiative is to gauge the influence of participation in social projects on Samara’s larger goal of civic learning. The Samara Regional Center for Civic Education (SCCE) coordinated this initiative in cooperation with the Civitas-Russia partnership. One of the Civitas partners, Charles White of Boston University School of Education, served as a technical advisor because of his expertise in the field of educational research and evaluation. Another Civitas partner, Stephen Schechter, Director of the Council for Citizenship Education, provided administrative support for this initiative. Design The research design and instruments for this monitoring initiative sought to replicate the work of CCE in Bosnia and Vontz et al. (2000) in Indiana, Latvia, and Lithuania. These studies employed well-established research methods with validated instruments. The monitoring team designed a pre-test and post-test for experimental and control groups. -
Diagnostics of Natural Indicators of Ecological Safety of Rural Territories of the Region
SHS Web of Conferences 62, 15002 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20196215002 Problems of Enterprise Development: Theory and Practice 2018 Diagnostics of Natural Indicators of Ecological Safety of Rural Territories of the Region A.A. Sidorov1,*, N.V. Lazareva1, I.I. Firulina1 and O.A. Sapova1 * Corresponding author: [email protected] 1Samara State University of Economics, Samara, Russia Abstract. Ecological safety of the territory plays an important role in the socio-economic regional welfare. The goal of the research is to define the condition of ecological safety of the Samara region, a large region of Russia. The objectives of research cover the evaluation of natural (gross and specific) environmental indicators of natural-anthropogenic environment of rural municipal areas for the period 2014-2017. Materials for the calculations were official statistics. Methods of description, comparison, mathematical analysis, logical constructions have been applied. As a result, natural and anthropogenic environmental instability, the ambiguous situation in the subregions and unresolved problems in land use, forest use, air pollution, water use, water supply and wastewater disposal, and waste management were identified. It is proposed to use the results that were obtained in strategic planning and improvement of measures to ensure sustainable development of rural areas. Keywords: environmental safety, conditions, emissions, waste, discharges. 1 Introduction The security of the territory as a whole is based on its interrelated and mutually influencing components of natural and anthropogenic characteristics: economic, social, ecological, medical, food and other types. Ecological safety, as a basic condition for the protection of ecological interests of the population and natural environment, plays an important role in the socio-economic regional welfare. -
Social and Behavioural Sciences Epsbs E-ISSN: 2357-1330
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
E-Mail: [email protected] SAMARA 2010
SAMARA e-mail: [email protected] www.strommashina.com 2010 ABOUT STROMMASHINA PRODUCTION COMPLEX CONTENTS 1. LOCATION AND LAND CATEGORY ............................................................................................................. 2 3. PRODUCTION SITE LAYOUT ....................................................................................................................... 3 4. PRESENT USE ............................................................................................................................................. 4 5. RESOURCES AND UTILITIES ....................................................................................................................... 6 6. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ..................................................................................................................... 6 7. REGION IN BRIEF ....................................................................................................................................... 6 8. ABOUT SAMARA RIVER PORT .................................................................................................................... 9 9. SAMARA – THE REGION'S ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER ............................................................................. 12 10. CONTACT INFORMATION ...................................................................................................................... 12 APPENDIX 1. MANUFACTURING ENTERPRISE MASTER FILE. ...................................................................... 13 APPENDIX 2. -
Typology of Russian Regions
TYPOLOGY OF RUSSIAN REGIONS Moscow, 2002 Authors: B. Boots, S. Drobyshevsky, O. Kochetkova, G. Malginov, V. Petrov, G. Fedorov, Al. Hecht, A. Shekhovtsov, A. Yudin The research and the publication were undertaken in the framework of CEPRA (Consortium for Economic Policy, Research and Advice) project funded by the Canadian Agency for International Development (CIDA). Page setting: A.Astakhov ISBN 5-93255-071-6 Publisher license ID # 02079 of June 19, 2000 5, Gazetny per., Moscow, 103918 Russia Tel. (095) 229–6413, FAX (095) 203–8816 E-MAIL – root @iet.ru, WEB Site – http://www.iet.ru Соntents Introduction.................................................................................................... 5 Chapter 1. Review of existing research papers on typology of Russian regions ........................................................................ 9 Chapter 2. Methodology of Multi-Dimensional Classification and Regional Typology in RF ................................................... 40 2.1. Tasks of Typology and Formal Tools for their Solution ................. 40 2.1.1. Problem Identification and Its Formalization .......................... 40 2.2. Features of Formal Tools ................................................................. 41 2.2.1. General approach .................................................................... 41 2.2.2. Characterization of clustering methods ................................... 43 2.2.3. Characterization of the methods of discriminative analysis ..... 45 2.3. Method for Economic Parameterisation.......................................... -
С. 103-114 Рефераты И Ключевые Слова 29.06.15
Abstracts of articles TECHNOLOGIES AND MECHANIZATION MEANS IN AGRICULTURE UDK 631.33.022.66 ASSESSMENT OF THE EXPIRATION ACTIVATOR INFLUENCE FOR PRODUCTIVITY OF THE DISK AND PIN SOWING DEVICE Savelyev Yu. A., dr. of techn. sciences, prof. of the department «Agricultural machines and mechanization of animal husband- ry», FSBEI HVE Samara SAA. 446442, Samara region, settlement Ust’-Kinelsky, Sportivnaya, 8-a str. E-mail: [email protected] Kryuchin N. P., dr. of techn. sciences, prof., head of the department «Mechanics and engineering graphics», FSBEI HVE Sama- ra SAA. 446442, Samara region, settlement Ust’-Kinelsky, Sportivnaya 8-a str. E-mail: [email protected] Kryuchin A. N., post-graduate student of the department «Agricultural machines and mechanization of animal husbandry», FSBEI HVE Samara SAA. 446442, Samara region, settlement Ust’-Kinelsky, Sportivnaya 8-a str. E-mail: [email protected] Keywords: productivity, seeds, disk-pin, meter, apparatus, activator. The aim of the research is increasing the performance of the sowing unit disk-pin through the use of the activator expiration of seed from the hopper. The most important device of any seeder is the sowing device. He has to create uniform stream of seed material with the set parameters. When dosing seeds of cereal herbs ensuring compliance with this condition is extremely diffi- cult. The special sowing device is developed for dispensing of seeds of a meadow grass and mix of herbs which part they are. Feature of this device is existence of the activator of the expiration of seed material from the bunker providing steady filling with space seeds on the dosing disk that allows to receive high quality indicators of seeding. -
Russian Federation. Facilitating International Market Access For
OCCASION This publication has been made available to the public on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the United Nations Industrial Development Organisation. DISCLAIMER This document has been produced without formal United Nations editing. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries, or its economic system or degree of development. Designations such as “developed”, “industrialized” and “developing” are intended for statistical convenience and do not necessarily express a judgment about the stage reached by a particular country or area in the development process. Mention of firm names or commercial products does not constitute an endorsement by UNIDO. FAIR USE POLICY Any part of this publication may be quoted and referenced for educational and research purposes without additional permission from UNIDO. However, those who make use of quoting and referencing this publication are requested to follow the Fair Use Policy of giving due credit to UNIDO. CONTACT Please contact [email protected] for further information concerning UNIDO publications. For more information about UNIDO, please visit us at www.unido.org UNITED NATIONS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION Vienna International Centre, P.O. Box -
Social and Behavioural Sciences Epsbs
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
Departure City City Of Delivery Region Delivery Delivery Time
Cost of Estimated Departure city city of delivery Region delivery delivery time Moscow Ababurovo Moscow 655 1 Moscow Abaza The Republic of Khakassia 1401 6 Moscow Abakan The Republic of Khakassia 722 2 Moscow Abbakumova Moscow region 655 1 Moscow Abdrakhmanovo Republic of Tatarstan 682 on request Moscow Abdreevo Ulyanovsk region 1360 5 Moscow Abdulov Ulyanovsk region 1360 5 Moscow Abinsk Krasnodar region 682 3 Moscow Abramovka Ulyanovsk region 1360 5 Moscow Abramovskikh Sverdlovsk region 1360 1 Moscow Abramtsevo Moscow region 655 1 Moscow Abramtzevo (Dmitrovsky reg) Moscow region 1360 3 Moscow Abrau Durso Krasnodar region 682 1 Moscow Avvakumova Tver region 655 5 Moscow Avdotyino Moscow region 655 1 Moscow Avdotyino (Stupinsky reg) Moscow region 1360 1 Averkieva Moscow Moscow region 1360 2 (Pavlovsky Posadskiy reg) Aviation workers Moscow Moscow region 1360 1 (Odintsovskiy-one) Moscow aviators Moscow region 655 1 Moscow Aviation Moscow region 655 1 Moscow Aviation Moscow region 655 1 Moscow Motorist Arhangelsk region 655 1 Moscow avtopoligone Moscow region 1360 3 Moscow Autoroute Moscow region 655 1 Moscow agarin Moscow region 655 1 Moscow Agarin (Stupinsky reg) Moscow region 1360 1 Moscow Agafonov Moscow region 655 1 Moscow AGAFONOVA (Odintsovskiy-one) Moscow region 1360 1 Moscow Agashkino Moscow region 655 5 Moscow Ageevka Oryol Region 655 1 Moscow Agidel Republic of Bashkortostan 1360 3 Moscow Agha Krasnodar region 682 3 Moscow Agrarnik Tver region 1306 6 Moscow agricultural Republic of Crimea 682 4 Moscow agrogorodok Moscow region -
All Sides Claim Victory in 1996 Gubernatorial Elections
ALL SIDES CLAIM VICTORY IN 1996 GUBERNATORIAL ELECTIONS Although they did not receive nearly as much international attention as the July presidential election, the 48 Russian regional elections held between 1 September and 5 January were closely watched by Russian politicians and commentators. Gubernatorial elections were held in 45 oblasts, krais, and autonomous okrugs, forcing leaders appointed by President Boris Yeltsin to face the voters. Three ethnic republics also elected top executives. Both the Kremlin and opposition leaders have portrayed the elections as a success, but many new governors have pledged to use their mandates to benefit their own regions, and it is difficult to predict where their primary loyalties will lie. Who are the new governors? Of the 48 incumbent regional leaders who faced elections in 1996, 20 held on to their jobs and 24 were defeated. Another three continue to serve pending repeat elections in their regions, and Tyumen Governor Leonid Roketskii will contest a runoff on 12 January. (A complete list of election results is attached to this issue of the Russian Regional Report.) Fifteen of the 24 new governors were elected mainly with the backing of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (KPRF) and its left-wing umbrella movement, the Popular-Patriotic Union of Russia (NPSR). Of the successful Communist-backed candidates, seven were chairmen of regional or local legislatures immediately before being elected governor (Krasnodar and Altai krais and Voronezh, Volgograd, Kaluga, Vladimir, and Kurgan oblasts). Four others were State Duma deputies (Kirov, Bryansk, and Chelyabinsk oblasts and Stavropol Krai), and one (Ryazan) worked in the parliament's Audit Chamber.