DOCSLIB.ORG

E-Mail: [email protected] SAMARA 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SAMARA e-mail: [email protected] www.strommashina.com 2010 ABOUT STROMMASHINA PRODUCTION COMPLEX CONTENTS 1. LOCATION AND LAND CATEGORY ............................................................................................................. 2 3. PRODUCTION SITE LAYOUT ....................................................................................................................... 3 4. PRESENT USE ............................................................................................................................................. 4 5. RESOURCES AND UTILITIES ....................................................................................................................... 6 6. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ..................................................................................................................... 6 7. REGION IN BRIEF ....................................................................................................................................... 6 8. ABOUT SAMARA RIVER PORT .................................................................................................................... 9 9. SAMARA – THE REGION'S ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER ............................................................................. 12 10. CONTACT INFORMATION ...................................................................................................................... 12 APPENDIX 1. MANUFACTURING ENTERPRISE MASTER FILE. ...................................................................... 13 APPENDIX 2. PRODUCTION BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES ............................................................................. 17 1 1. LOCATION AND LAND CATEGORY The production complex has an area of 21.9 ha and includes buildings and facilities of an area of 87.8 th.m2. STROMMASHINA production complex is located in the industrial zone at: 10а XXII Parts'ezda Street in the Sovetskiy district of Samara. The production complex is located in the areas classified as "Industrial companies and warehouses" PK1 (hazard class 1, 2) and "Lands of inhabited localities" PK3 (hazard class 5, 6). Distance to residential buildings – 300...1500 meters (depending on the starting point at the site). By road: the industrial complex is facing XXII Parts'ezda st. and Kabelnaya st. A distance along XXII Parts'ezda st. to the corner of XXII Parts'ezda st. and Zavpdskoye highway is about 500 m. By rail: goods may be delivered and received by rail (at Samarka station of the Kuybyshev Railroad). A contract for the provision and collection of rolling stock is made with VolgaUralTrans OJSC. By river: cargo unloading platforms are about 1.5 km far from the complex on the Samara river. 2 2. PRODUCTION SITE LAYOUT 3 3. TODAY History: The plant was founded in 1942. With its newly built workshop being run the plant began production of М-30 machines, water-and-oil heaters and bulkheads. 1945 – since its foundation in 1942 till the end of 1945 the plant was involved in government contracts for the manufacture of metalwork and installation of towers, manufacture and installation of radio masts. In 1946, the plant was handed over to the Ministry of Construction and Road Engineering and renamed to STROMMASHINA Kuybyshevskiy Plant. 1999/2003 – recovery and modernization. 2005 till now – the plant is a contractor of the Federal Service for Defense Order (Gosoboronzakaz) and positioning itself at the forefront of the construction material machinery market (incl. metalwork production/processing machinery) The plant employs 500 people. Core activities: Manufacture of grinding, drying, de-dusting and conveying equipment, special purpose products and metalwork. Scientific and technical subdivisions: Chief Designer Service (CDS): development, batch monitoring and final adjustment of design documents (DD) of customers; research and development; Chief process engineer service (CPES): development of technology and tooling; development of control programs for CNC lathes; Central Plant Laboratory (CPL) – this is a powerful analytical center with own test base and up-to-date process equipment allowing to conduct comprehensive inspections, tests, incoming and process control of raw material and finished products including by means of NDT. Production and processing: The plant possesses all kinds of manufacturing technologies in the field of general engineering. Production area: 90,000 sq.m. Hoisting equipment: up to 16 tons. Equipment mix: 314 metal cutting units of all major types, including, 27 CNC machines, 15 electric welding machines, 2 galvanic units, 18 large-size turning lathes, 2 large-size milling machines. 4 Mechanical and assembly: Processing workshops provide high level of accuracy and cleanliness of treated steel surfaces (including stainless steel); sheet-metal stamping, finishing cut and forming are used. The plant has mastered different types of welding and all types of brazing, including: argon arc brazing and controlled-atmosphere brazing. The plant's production capacity allows for monthly production of 300-400 tons of metalwork. Toolmaking: The plant's workshops produce fixtures and press-forms, stamps, cutting tools and instrumentation. Quality control: High quality of production is promoted by incoming inspections, quality policy and quality management system. Quality management system is based on ISO 9001, SRPP VT, complies with the requirements of GOST RV 15.002-2003 and certified by a certification authority in the OBORONCERTIFICATE certification system. At present, the production complex is a machine-building plant manufacturing a wide range of products (equipment for road construction, construction, coal, mining, chemical and oil sectors). Site premises include warehouses and offices. Please refer to the Appendix for the site master file. 5 4. RESOURCES AND UTILITIES 1. Railroad facilities: 11 rail tracks (non-through) of a total length of appr. 3.3 km. 1 diesel locomotive. Unloading/loading platforms equipped with gantry cranes. 2. Power supply: Installed capacity 12 MW, licensed capacity 18.2 MW. Supplier – SamaraEnergo OJSC, grid company – Volga IDGC. 3. Gas supply: Limit – 102,000 m3, commercial – 330,000 m3 . Supplier – Samararegiongaz LLC, grid company –SVGK. Inlet gas pressure –1.2 kg/cm3, working gas pressure – 0.25 kg/cm3. 4. Heat load: Total – 25.5 Gcal. Supplier – branch of Volga TGC. 5. Water supply: Limit – 22,152m3/year. Contract with SamaraVodokanal 1 well. Existing limits can be allocated for new projects and increased as the need arises. Currently, boiler house and heating system projects are in the pipeline. 5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION For more information about the company, please refer to the website at www.strommashina.com 6. REGION IN BRIEF Samara Oblast is a densely populated region of Russia. The region is regarded for its well- developed industry, construction industry and construction infrastructure. 6 Samara Oblast is a federal subject of Russia (an oblast) and a part of the Volga Federal District. The region borders with Saratov, Ulyanovsk and Orenburg Oblasts, the Republic of Tatarstan and Kazakhstan (in a very small part). Governor – Vladimir Vladimirovich Artyakov. The region's administrative center is the city of Samara. Population Population: 3,167.2 thousand people (July 2010). The region ranks 2nd in the Volga region and 12th in Russia. Population density and urbanization: the region is the leader of the Volga region with its 80.3% of urban population. The population of Samara is 1,134 thousand people (as of January 2010). The population of a two-center agglomeration Samara-Tolyatti, including the satellites Novokuybyshevsk, Kinel, Chapaevsk, Zhigulyovsk is 2.3 million (ranks 3rd in Russia to Moscow and St. Petersburg). Fossil minerals Fuel resources: oil, natural gas, oil shale; a variety of raw construction materials and water resources. 7 Samara Oblast is the old oil-producing region with its 2.6% in Russian oil production. More than 380 oil fields were explored and developed. In 2000-2009, average annual oil production amounted to more than 11.0 million tons. In 2009, oil production amounted to 13,170,000. tons, which is 11.5% more than in 2008. A topical issue is the development and implementation of effective ways to increase oil recovery and ensuring the best use of associated gas extracted in the development of oil fields. Mineral construction materials include building stone, brick and tile raw materials, building sand, expanded clay, refractory clay, cement raw material, gypsum, carbonate rocks for production of lime, gypsum and anhydrite, sand and gravel, glass-making sand. Mining and chemical raw materials include phosphorites, native sulfur, rock salt, asphaltites and bitumen, natural bitumen and oil shales. Mining resources include molding sand, bentonite clay and zeolite-containing rocks. Major industries The industry is represented by appr. 400 large and medium-sized companies and more than 4,000 small companies. The most developed industries are mechanical engineering and metalworking, fuel industry, electric power sector, chemical and petrochemical industry, nonferrous metallurgy. Mechanical engineering is represented by an almost full range of basic industries, in which the automotive industry plays a major role. The share of vehicles produced by AvtoVAZ (Tolyatti) is more than 70% of the country's production. The share of main petroleum products such as petrol, diesel and fuel oil is 10-12%. Specialization ratio (per capita production): industrial output 1.9 – ranking 2nd to
Recommended publications
  • Diatomic Compounds in the Soils of Bee-Farm and Nearby Territories in Samarskaya Oblast

    Diatomic Compounds in the Soils of Bee-Farm and Nearby Territories in Samarskaya Oblast

    BIO Web of Conferences 27, 00036 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20202700036 FIES 2020 Diatomic compounds in the soils of bee-farm and nearby territories in Samarskaya oblast N.Ye. Zemskova1,*, A.I. Fazlutdinova2, V.N. Sattarov2 and L.M. Safiullinа2 1Samara State Agrarian University, Ust-Kinelskiy, Samarskaya oblast, 446442, Russia 2Bashkir State Pedagogical University n.a. M. Akmulla, Ufa, 450008, Russia Abstract. This article sheds light on the role diatomic algae in soils play in the assessment of bee farm and nearby territories in four soil and landscape zones in Samarskaya Oblast. The community of diatomic algae is characterized by low species diversity, of which 23 taxons were found. The most often found species are represented by Hantzschia amphioxys (Ehrenberg) Grunow in Cleve & Grunow and Luticola mutica (Kützing) D.G.Mann in Round et al. The maximum of phyla (18) were found in the buffer (transient) zone; in the wooded steppe zone, 11 species were recorded; in the steppe – 2 species, and in the dry steppe zone no species of diatomic algae were found. The qualitative and quantitative characteristics of diatomic algae communities in various biotopes depend on the natural and climate features of a territory and the degree of the anthropogenic impact on the soil and vegetation, which is proved by the fact that high species wealth signifies that the ecosystem is stable and resilient to the changing conditions in the environment, while poor algal flora is less resilient due to the lower degree of diversity. 1 Introduction Diatomic algae play a special role in habitats with extreme conditions [6, 7].
  • Industrial Framework of Russia. the 250 Largest Industrial Centers Of

    Industrial Framework of Russia. the 250 Largest Industrial Centers Of

    INDUSTRIAL FRAMEWORK OF RUSSIA 250 LARGEST INDUSTRIAL CENTERS OF RUSSIA Metodology of the Ranking. Data collection INDUSTRIAL FRAMEWORK OF RUSSIA The ranking is based on the municipal statistics published by the Federal State Statistics Service on the official website1. Basic indicator is Shipment of The 250 Largest Industrial Centers of own production goods, works performed and services rendered related to mining and manufacturing in 2010. The revenue in electricity, gas and water Russia production and supply was taken into account only regarding major power plants which belong to major generation companies of the wholesale electricity market. Therefore, the financial results of urban utilities and other About the Ranking public services are not taken into account in the industrial ranking. The aim of the ranking is to observe the most significant industrial centers in Spatial analysis regarding the allocation of business (productive) assets of the Russia which play the major role in the national economy and create the leading Russian and multinational companies2 was performed. Integrated basis for national welfare. Spatial allocation, sectorial and corporate rankings and company reports was analyzed. That is why with the help of the structure of the 250 Largest Industrial Centers determine “growing points” ranking one could follow relationship between welfare of a city and activities and “depression areas” on the map of Russia. The ranking allows evaluation of large enterprises. Regarding financial results of basic enterprises some of the role of primary production sector at the local level, comparison of the statistical data was adjusted, for example in case an enterprise is related to a importance of large enterprises and medium business in the structure of city but it is located outside of the city border.
  • Global Energy Company Company SCALE TECHNOLOGY RESPONSIBILITY

    Global Energy Company Company SCALE TECHNOLOGY RESPONSIBILITY

    Global Energy Global Energy Company Company SCALE TECHNOLOGY RESPONSIBILITY Rosneft is the Russian oil Rosneft is the champion Rosneft is the biggest taxpayer Annual report 2013 industry champion and the of qualitative modernization in the Russian Federation. world’s biggest public oil and innovative change in the Active participation in the Annual report 2013 and gas company by proved Russian oil and gas industry. social life of the regions hydrocarbon reserves Proprietary solutions to of operations. and production. improve oil and synthetic Creating optimal conditions Unique portfolio of upstream liquid fuel production for professional development assets. performance. and high standards of social Leading positions for oshore Establishing R&D centers security and healthcare for development. in a partnership with global the employees. Growing role in the Asia- leaders in technology Unprecedented program Pacific markets. development and application. for land remediation. ROSNEFT Scale Technology Annual report online: www.rosneft.ru Responsibility www.rosneft.com/attach/0/58/80/a_report_2013_eng.pdf OUR RECORD ACHIEVEMENTS 551 RUB BLN RECORD NET INCOME +51% Page 136 4,694 RUB BLN RECORD REVENUES +52% Page 136 85 4 ,873 RUB BLN KBOED RECORD DIVIDENDS RECORD HYDROCARBONS PAID IN 2013 PRODUCTION +80.3%* Page 124 Page 28 90.1 42.1 MLN TONS* BCM** RECORD OIL GAS PRODUCTION, REFINING VOLUMES RUSSIA’s third largesT References to Rosneft Oil Company, Rosneft, or GAS PRODUCER the Company are to either Rosneft Oil Company or Rosneft Oil Company, its subsidiaries and affil- +46% iates, as the context may require. References to * TNK-BP assets accounted for from the date TNK-BP, TNK-BP company are to TNK-BP Group.
  • Monitoring the Effectiveness of Youth Participation in Project Citizen A

    Monitoring the Effectiveness of Youth Participation in Project Citizen A

    Monitoring the Effectiveness of Youth Participation in Project Citizen A Civitas-Russia Evaluation Project Summary of Preliminary Findings June 2005 Background In November 2002, Civitas-Russia began a monitoring initiative to evaluate the effectiveness of youth participation in the Russian variation of Project Citizen entitled “I am a Citizen of Russia.” We decided to focus this monitoring initiative in Samara where Project Citizen has been underway since 1998. In Samara, there is a civics curriculum for all grade levels designed to provide an integrated approach to pupil learning of the values, skills and knowledge required of citizens in a democratic society. The Samara educational system has incorporated the social project approach in general and Project Citizen in particular as one strategy for advancing its civic learning goals. The purpose of this monitoring initiative is to gauge the influence of participation in social projects on Samara’s larger goal of civic learning. The Samara Regional Center for Civic Education (SCCE) coordinated this initiative in cooperation with the Civitas-Russia partnership. One of the Civitas partners, Charles White of Boston University School of Education, served as a technical advisor because of his expertise in the field of educational research and evaluation. Another Civitas partner, Stephen Schechter, Director of the Council for Citizenship Education, provided administrative support for this initiative. Design The research design and instruments for this monitoring initiative sought to replicate the work of CCE in Bosnia and Vontz et al. (2000) in Indiana, Latvia, and Lithuania. These studies employed well-established research methods with validated instruments. The monitoring team designed a pre-test and post-test for experimental and control groups.
  • GCPMED 2018 International Scientific Conference "Global Challenges and Prospects of the Modern Economic Development"

    GCPMED 2018 International Scientific Conference "Global Challenges and Prospects of the Modern Economic Development"

    The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences EpSBS Future Academy ISSN: 2357-1330 https://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.03.164 GCPMED 2018 International Scientific Conference "Global Challenges and Prospects of the Modern Economic Development" EVOLUTION OF INDUSTRIAL COMPLEXES: FROM INDUSTRIAL PARKS TO SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PARKS V.M. Shepelev (a)*, A.A. Larkinа (a), I.V. Kosyakova (a), M.A. Gavrilova (a), O.A. Kulaeva (b) *Corresponding author (a) Samara State Technical University, ulitsa Molodogvardeyskaya, 244, Samara, 443090, Russia, [email protected] (b) Samara State Social-Pedagogical University, Maksima Gorkogo Str., 65/67, 443090, Samara, Russia, iv- [email protected] Abstract Nowadays the world economy is on the way to the sixth technological way to which continuous innovative process is peculiar. Each technological period forms a certain set of innovations directed to the sustained economic growth. In the developed countries from 40% to 90% of the growth of the gross domestic product is formed due to high technologies. For Russia, which is in the sphere of political and economic sanctions, one of the main forces in formation of sustainable development there have to be science and technology parks. Their main objective is creation and advance of scientific and technical business. Diversification and new technologies are very important for Russia which is in rather dense technological dependence on a number of foreign countries today. It is on the basis of the retrospective analysis of emergence and development of science and technology parks in country aspect, the qualitative analysis of changes of the comparative characteristic of the technological processes accompanying development of territorial and industrial complexes and creation of the knowledge-intensive competitive production.
  • Diagnostics of Natural Indicators of Ecological Safety of Rural Territories of the Region

    Diagnostics of Natural Indicators of Ecological Safety of Rural Territories of the Region

    SHS Web of Conferences 62, 15002 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20196215002 Problems of Enterprise Development: Theory and Practice 2018 Diagnostics of Natural Indicators of Ecological Safety of Rural Territories of the Region A.A. Sidorov1,*, N.V. Lazareva1, I.I. Firulina1 and O.A. Sapova1 * Corresponding author: [email protected] 1Samara State University of Economics, Samara, Russia Abstract. Ecological safety of the territory plays an important role in the socio-economic regional welfare. The goal of the research is to define the condition of ecological safety of the Samara region, a large region of Russia. The objectives of research cover the evaluation of natural (gross and specific) environmental indicators of natural-anthropogenic environment of rural municipal areas for the period 2014-2017. Materials for the calculations were official statistics. Methods of description, comparison, mathematical analysis, logical constructions have been applied. As a result, natural and anthropogenic environmental instability, the ambiguous situation in the subregions and unresolved problems in land use, forest use, air pollution, water use, water supply and wastewater disposal, and waste management were identified. It is proposed to use the results that were obtained in strategic planning and improvement of measures to ensure sustainable development of rural areas. Keywords: environmental safety, conditions, emissions, waste, discharges. 1 Introduction The security of the territory as a whole is based on its interrelated and mutually influencing components of natural and anthropogenic characteristics: economic, social, ecological, medical, food and other types. Ecological safety, as a basic condition for the protection of ecological interests of the population and natural environment, plays an important role in the socio-economic regional welfare.
  • Social and Behavioural Sciences Epsbs E-ISSN: 2357-1330

    Social and Behavioural Sciences Epsbs E-ISSN: 2357-1330

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
  • BR IFIC N° 2639 Index/Indice

    BR IFIC N° 2639 Index/Indice

    BR IFIC N° 2639 Index/Indice International Frequency Information Circular (Terrestrial Services) ITU - Radiocommunication Bureau Circular Internacional de Información sobre Frecuencias (Servicios Terrenales) UIT - Oficina de Radiocomunicaciones Circulaire Internationale d'Information sur les Fréquences (Services de Terre) UIT - Bureau des Radiocommunications Part 1 / Partie 1 / Parte 1 Date/Fecha 10.03.2009 Description of Columns Description des colonnes Descripción de columnas No. Sequential number Numéro séquenciel Número sequencial BR Id. BR identification number Numéro d'identification du BR Número de identificación de la BR Adm Notifying Administration Administration notificatrice Administración notificante 1A [MHz] Assigned frequency [MHz] Fréquence assignée [MHz] Frecuencia asignada [MHz] Name of the location of Nom de l'emplacement de Nombre del emplazamiento de 4A/5A transmitting / receiving station la station d'émission / réception estación transmisora / receptora 4B/5B Geographical area Zone géographique Zona geográfica 4C/5C Geographical coordinates Coordonnées géographiques Coordenadas geográficas 6A Class of station Classe de station Clase de estación Purpose of the notification: Objet de la notification: Propósito de la notificación: Intent ADD-addition MOD-modify ADD-ajouter MOD-modifier ADD-añadir MOD-modificar SUP-suppress W/D-withdraw SUP-supprimer W/D-retirer SUP-suprimir W/D-retirar No. BR Id Adm 1A [MHz] 4A/5A 4B/5B 4C/5C 6A Part Intent 1 109013920 ARG 7156.0000 CASEROS ARG 58W28'29'' 32S27'41'' FX 1 ADD 2 109013877
  • List of Cities in Russia

    List of Cities in Russia

    Population Population Sr.No City/town Federal subject (2002 (2010 Census (preliminary)) Census) 001 Moscow Moscow 10,382,754 11,514,330 002 Saint Petersburg Saint Petersburg 4,661,219 4,848,742 003 Novosibirsk Novosibirsk Oblast 1,425,508 1,473,737 004 Yekaterinburg Sverdlovsk Oblast 1,293,537 1,350,136 005 Nizhny Novgorod Nizhny Novgorod Oblast 1,311,252 1,250,615 006 Samara Samara Oblast 1,157,880 1,164,896 007 Omsk Omsk Oblast 1,134,016 1,153,971 008 Kazan Republic of Tatarstan 1,105,289 1,143,546 009 Chelyabinsk Chelyabinsk Oblast 1,077,174 1,130,273 010 Rostov-on-Don Rostov Oblast 1,068,267 1,089,851 011 Ufa Republic of Bashkortostan 1,042,437 1,062,300 012 Volgograd Volgograd Oblast 1,011,417 1,021,244 013 Perm Perm Krai 1,001,653 991,530 014 Krasnoyarsk Krasnoyarsk Krai 909,341 973,891 015 Voronezh Voronezh Oblast 848,752 889,989 016 Saratov Saratov Oblast 873,055 837,831 017 Krasnodar Krasnodar Krai 646,175 744,933 018 Tolyatti Samara Oblast 702,879 719,514 019 Izhevsk Udmurt Republic 632,140 628,116 020 Ulyanovsk Ulyanovsk Oblast 635,947 613,793 021 Barnaul Altai Krai 600,749 612,091 022 Vladivostok Primorsky Krai 594,701 592,069 023 Yaroslavl Yaroslavl Oblast 613,088 591,486 024 Irkutsk Irkutsk Oblast 593,604 587,225 025 Tyumen Tyumen Oblast 510,719 581,758 026 Makhachkala Republic of Dagestan 462,412 577,990 027 Khabarovsk Khabarovsk Krai 583,072 577,668 028 Novokuznetsk Kemerovo Oblast 549,870 547,885 029 Orenburg Orenburg Oblast 549,361 544,987 030 Kemerovo Kemerovo Oblast 484,754 532,884 031 Ryazan Ryazan Oblast 521,560
  • Russian Federation. Facilitating International Market Access For

    Russian Federation. Facilitating International Market Access For

    OCCASION This publication has been made available to the public on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the United Nations Industrial Development Organisation. DISCLAIMER This document has been produced without formal United Nations editing. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries, or its economic system or degree of development. Designations such as “developed”, “industrialized” and “developing” are intended for statistical convenience and do not necessarily express a judgment about the stage reached by a particular country or area in the development process. Mention of firm names or commercial products does not constitute an endorsement by UNIDO. FAIR USE POLICY Any part of this publication may be quoted and referenced for educational and research purposes without additional permission from UNIDO. However, those who make use of quoting and referencing this publication are requested to follow the Fair Use Policy of giving due credit to UNIDO. CONTACT Please contact [email protected] for further information concerning UNIDO publications. For more information about UNIDO, please visit us at www.unido.org UNITED NATIONS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION Vienna International Centre, P.O. Box
  • Social and Behavioural Sciences Epsbs

    Social and Behavioural Sciences Epsbs

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
  • Kuibyshev Reservoir, Russian Federation

    Kuibyshev Reservoir, Russian Federation

    water Article Shoreline Dynamics and Evaluation of Cultural Heritage Sites on the Shores of Large Reservoirs: Kuibyshev Reservoir, Russian Federation Ionut Cristi Nicu 1,* , Bulat Usmanov 2 , Iskander Gainullin 3 and Madina Galimova 3 1 High North Department, Norwegian Institute for Cultural Heritage Research (NIKU), Fram Centre, N-9296 Tromsø, Norway 2 Department of Landscape Ecology, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Kazan Federal University, 5 Tovarisheskaya Street, 420097 Kazan, Russia; [email protected] 3 Khalikov Institute of Archaeology, 30 Butlerova Street, 420012 Kazan, Russia; [email protected] (I.G.); [email protected] (M.G.) * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected]; Tel.: +47-98063607 Received: 15 February 2019; Accepted: 20 March 2019; Published: 21 March 2019 Abstract: Over the last decades, the number of artificial reservoirs around the world has considerably increased. This leads to the formation of new shorelines, which are highly dynamic regarding erosion and deposition processes. The present work aims to assess the direct human action along the largest reservoir in Europe—Kuibyshev (Russian Federation) and to analyse threatened cultural heritage sites from the coastal area, with the help of historical maps, UAV (unmanned aerial vehicle), and topographic surveys. This approach is a necessity, due to the oscillating water level, local change of climate, and to the continuous increasing of natural hazards (in this case coastal erosion) all over the world. Many studies are approaching coastal areas of the seas and oceans, yet there are fewer studies regarding the inland coastal areas of large artificial reservoirs. Out of the total number of 1289 cultural heritage sites around the Kuibyshev reservoir, only 90 sites are not affected by the dam building; the rest had completely disappeared under the reservoir’s water.