DOCSLIB.ORG

Elk Populations on Etolin and Zarembo Islands, Alaska

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Elk Populations on Etolin and Zarembo Islands, Alaska University of Denver Digital Commons @ DU Geography and the Environment: Graduate Student Capstones Department of Geography and the Environment 12-2013 Spatial Relationships, Movements, and Habitat Associations of Introduced “Non-Native” Elk Populations on Etolin and Zarembo Islands, Alaska Jean S. Davidson Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/geog_ms_capstone Part of the Geographic Information Sciences Commons, and the Physical and Environmental Geography Commons Recommended Citation Davidson, Jean S., "Spatial Relationships, Movements, and Habitat Associations of Introduced “Non- Native” Elk Populations on Etolin and Zarembo Islands, Alaska" (2013). Geography and the Environment: Graduate Student Capstones. 48. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/geog_ms_capstone/48 This Capstone is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Geography and the Environment at Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Geography and the Environment: Graduate Student Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. SPATIAL RELATIONSHIPS, MOVEMENTS, AND HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS OF INTRODUCED “NON- NATIVE” ELK POPULATIONS ON ETOLIN AND ZAREMBO ISLANDS, ALASKA __________ A C apston e Project Presented to the Faculty of Natural Sciences and M athem atics University of Denver __________ In Partial Fu lfillm en t of the Requirem ents for the Degree M aster of S cien ce __________ by Jean S. Davidson Decem ber 2013 Advisor: Steven R. H ick D a v id so n - ii © Copyright by Jean S. Davidson 2013 All Rights Reserved D a v id so n - iii Author: Jean S. Davidson T it le : S p a t ia l R e lation sh ips, M ovem en ts, an d H abitat A ssociation s of Introduced “Non- Native” Elk Populations on Etolin and Zarem bo Islands, A la s k a Advisor: Steven R. Hick Degree Date: June 2014 A b s tra c t Etolin and Roosevelt Elk w ere introduced to A fognak Island, A laska in 1929 (State of Alaska, 2013). Due to the success of that introduction, Roosevelt Elk and Rocky Mountain Elk were subsequently introduced to Z arem bo and Etolin Islands in Southeast Alaska in 1987. Due to the environm ent of Southeast Alaska, the ability to determ ine m ovem ents, trends, and h abitat preferences are limited. In support of the Alaska Departm ent of Fish and G am e (A D F& G ), th is proje ct an alyze s th e h abitat preferences of the elk based upon data from global positionin g system s. Locational data is analyzed for proximity to m anaged lands and con siders proxim ity to fresh w ater and slope. Findings w ill be incorporated into A D F & G ’s long term m anagem ent of the elk and the m anaged areas. D a v id so n - iv Acknow ledgem ents I w ould like to thank M r. R ichard Low ell of th e Alaska Departm ent of Fish an d G am e for h is assistan ce an d gu idan ce th rou gh th is process. I would also wish to thank Mr. Robert Davidson for his insight and patience. D a v id so n - v Table of Contents Chapter One: In tro d u c tio n .........................................................................................................1 Background ........................................................................................................................1 E lk ........................................................................................................................................3 Environm ent ......................................................................................................................5 Managed and Unm anaged Lands..................................................................................8 Geographic Inform ation System s ............................................................................... 10 Chapter Tw o: Design and Im plem entation .......................................................................... 12 Global Positioning System s .......................................................................................... 12 Analysis Methodology .................................................................................................... 12 Chapter Three: Results ............................................................................................................. 16 E to lin Is la n d ..................................................................................................................... 16 Zarem bo Island............................................................................................................... 49 Chapter Four: Discussion ......................................................................................................... 76 D e n s ity .............................................................................................................................. 76 Fresh W ater ..................................................................................................................... 77 S lo p e ................................................................................................................................. 78 M anaged Lands ............................................................................................................... 79 Chapter Five: Summary ........................................................................................................... 81 References ................................................................................................................................... 82 B ib lio g ra p h y ................................................................................................................................. 86 Table of Figures D a v id so n - vi Figure 1. Case Study Location and Orientation ....................................................................7 Figure 2. Etolin Island, A laska Subset A reas ....................................................................... 17 Figure 3. Etolin Island, Elk Density Locations for 2008 to 2011..................................... 18 Figure 4. Etolin Island, Elk D ensity: A utum nal Equinox to W inter S olstice ................. 19 Figure 5. Etolin Island, Elk D ensity: R utting Locations ..................................................... 20 Figure 6. Etolin Island, Elk D ensity: W inter S olstice to V ernal Equinox ....................... 21 Figure 7. Etolin Island, E lk Density: Vernal Equinox to Sum m er Solstice .................... 22 Figure 8. Etolin Island, Elk D ensity: Calving Locations ..................................................... 23 Figure 9.Etolin Island, Elk Density: Sum m er Solstice to Autum nal Equinox ............... 24 Figure 10. Etolin Island, Elk Locations in Relation to Fresh W ater................................. 26 Figure 11. Etolin Island, Elk Locations in Relation to Fresh W ater, S ubset 1 .............. 27 Figure 12. Etolin Island, Elk Locations in R elation to Fresh W ater, S ubset 2 .............. 28 Figure 13. Etolin Island, Elk Locations in R elation to Fresh W a te r, S u bs e t 3 .............. 29 Figure 14. Etolin Island, Elk Locations in Relation to Fresh W ater, S ubset 4 .............. 30 Figure 15. Etolin Island, Elk Locations in Relation to Fresh W ater, S ubset 5 .............. 31 Figure 16. Etolin Island, Elk Locations in Relation to Fresh W ater, S ubset 6 .............. 32 Figure 17. Etolin Island, Elk Locations on S pecified S lope Percentages ....................... 34 F ig u re 1 8. Etolin Island, Elk Locations on S pecified S lope Percentages, S ubset 1 .... 35 Figure 19. Etolin Island, Elk Locations on S pecified S lope Percentages, Subset 2 .... 36 Figure 20. Etolin Island, Elk Locations on S pecified S lope Percentages, S ubset 3 .... 37 Figure 21. Etolin Island, Elk Locations on S pecified S lope Percentages, S ubset 4 .... 38 Figure 22. Etolin Island, Elk Locations on S pecified S lope Percentages, S ubset 5 .... 39 Figure 23. Etolin Island, Elk Locations on S pecified S lope Percentages, S ubset 6 .... 40 Figure 24. Etolin Island, Elk Locations in Relation to M anaged Lands .......................... 42 Figure 25. Etolin Island, Elk Locations in Relation to M anaged Lands, S ubset 1 ....... 43 Figure 26. Etolin Island, Elk Locations in Relation to M anaged Lands, S ubset 2 ....... 44 Figure 27. Etolin Island, Elk Locations in Relation to M anaged Lands, S ubset 3 ....... 45 Figure 28. Etolin Island, Elk Locations in Relation to M anaged Lands, S ubset 4 ....... 46 Figure 29. Etolin Island, Elk Locations in R elation to Managed Lands, Subset 5 ....... 47 Figure 30. Etolin Island, Elk Locations in Relation to M anaged Lands, S ubset 6 ....... 48 Figure 31. Zarem bo Island, Subset Areas............................................................................ 50 Figure 32. Zarem bo Island, Elk Density Locations for 2008 and 2009 ......................... 51 Figu re 3 3 . Z arem bo Island, Elk Density Locations: Autumnal Equinox to W inter S o ls tic e ......................................................................................................................................... 52 Figure 34. Zarem bo Island, Elk D ensity Rutting Locations .............................................. 53 Figure 35. Zarem bo Island, Elk Density Locations: W inter Solstice to Vernal Equinox ........................................................................................................................................................ 54 Figure 36. Zarem bo Island, Elk Density Locations: Vernal Equinox to Sum m er S
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Report of Survey-Inventory Activities 1 July 1988-30 June 1989 .....ELK
    Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Wildlife Conservation Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Annual Report of Survey-Inventory Activities 1 July 1988-30 June 1989 .....ELK- Compiled and edited by Sid 0. Morsan, Publications Technician Vol XX, Part ill Project W-23-2, Study 13.0 May 1990 STATE OF ALASKA Steve Cowper, Governor DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME Don W. Collinsworth, Commissioner DIVISION OF WILDLIFE CONSERVATION W. Lewis Pamplin, Jr., Director W. Bruce Dinneford, Acting Planning Chief Persons intending to cite this material should obtain prior permis­ sion from the author(s) and/or the Alaska Department of Fish and Game. Because most reports deal with preliminary results of conti­ nuing studies, conclusions are tentative and should be identified as such. Due credit will be appreciated. Additional copies of this report, or reports on other species covered in this series may be obtained from: Publications Technician ADF&G, Wildlife Conservation P.O. Box 3-2000 Juneau, AK 99802 (907) 465-4190 The Alaska Department of Fish & Game operates all of its public pro­ grams and activities free from discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, or handicap. Because the department receives federal funding, any person who believes he or she has been discriminated against should write to: O.E.O., U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. 20240. TABLE OF CONTENTS .. ) Game Management Unit Map. • . • . • • .I . • ii Statewide Harvest and Population status • .iii Game Management Unit/Geographical Description GMU 3 - Islands of the Petersburg, Wrangell, and Kake areas • . • . • • . 1 GMU 8 - Kodiak, Afognak, and adjacent islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Petition to List the Alexander Archipelago Wolf in Southeast
    BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF INTERIOR PETITION TO LIST THE ALEXANDER ARCHIPELAGO WOLF (CANIS LUPUS LIGONI) IN SOUTHEAST ALASKA AS THREATENED OR ENDANGERED UNDER THE U.S. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT © ROBIN SILVER PETITIONERS CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, ALASKA RAINFOREST DEFENDERS, AND DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE JULY 15, 2020 NOTICE OF PETITION David Bernhardt, Secretary U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW Washington, D.C. 20240 [email protected] Margaret Everson, Principal Deputy Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1849 C Street NW Washington, D.C. 20240 [email protected] Gary Frazer, Assistant Director for Endangered Species U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1840 C Street NW Washington, D.C. 20240 [email protected] Greg Siekaniec, Alaska Regional Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1011 East Tudor Road Anchorage, AK 99503 [email protected] PETITIONERS Shaye Wolf, Ph.D. Larry Edwards Center for Biological Diversity Alaska Rainforest Defenders 1212 Broadway P.O. Box 6064 Oakland, California 94612 Sitka, Alaska 99835 (415) 385-5746 (907) 772-4403 [email protected] [email protected] Randi Spivak Patrick Lavin, J.D. Public Lands Program Director Defenders of Wildlife Center for Biological Diversity 441 W. 5th Avenue, Suite 302 (310) 779-4894 Anchorage, AK 99501 [email protected] (907) 276-9410 [email protected] _________________________ Date this 15 day of July 2020 2 Pursuant to Section 4(b) of the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. §1533(b), Section 553(3) of the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. § 553(e), and 50 C.F.R. § 424.14(a), the Center for Biological Diversity, Alaska Rainforest Defenders, and Defenders of Wildlife petition the Secretary of the Interior, through the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“USFWS”), to list the Alexander Archipelago wolf (Canis lupus ligoni) in Southeast Alaska as a threatened or endangered species.
    [Show full text]
  • By S.M. Karl and R.D. Koch
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY MAP MF-197C C U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MAPS AND PRELIMINARY INTERPRETATION OF ANOMALOUS ROCK GEOCHEMICAL DATA FROM THE PETERSBURG QUADRANGLE, AND PARTS OF THE PORT ALEXANDER, SITKA, AND SUMDUM QUADRANGLES, SOUTHEASTERN ALASKA By S.M. Karl and R.D. Koch INTRODUCTION flysch, volcanic rocks, and melange that includes fault- bounded blocks of older sedimentary and volcanic rocks. Statistical analyses of minor- and trace-element The eastern part of the study area comprises the geochemical data for 6,974 rock samples from the Mainland belt of Brew and others (1984), which include" Petersburg quadrangle and minor parts of the Port the Taku and Tracy Arm terranes of Berg and others Alexander, Sitka, and Sumdum quadrangles (hereafter (1978). According to Brew and others (1984), rocks of referred to as the Petersburg study area) identified 887 the Taku and Tracy Arm terranes may include samples with anomalously high concentrations of one or metamorphosed equivalents of the Alexander terrane more elements. This report includes a list of the 887 rocks. The country rocks of the Mainland belt increase samples (table 1), histograms showing the distribution of in metamorphic grade from west to east, to as high as chemical values (see fig. 2), a brief description of the amphibolite facies, and are intruded by various igneous geologic context and distribution of the samples, a map components of the Coast plutonic-metamorphic complex of bedrock geochemical groups (sheet 1), and 12 maps of Brew and Ford (1984) (sheet 1). showing the locations of samples that have anomalous The Coast plutonic-metamorphic complex includes amounts of precious metals, base metals, and selected rare the metamorphosed equivalents of the Paleozoic and metals (sheets 2-7).
    [Show full text]
  • Abundance, Prey Availability and Diets of American Martens: Implications for the Design of Old-Growth Reserves in Southeast Alaska
    Wildlife Research Final Report ABUNDANCE, PREY AVAILABILITY AND DIETS OF AMERICAN MARTENS: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE DESIGN OF OLD-GROWTH RESERVES IN SOUTHEAST ALASKA Rodney W. Flynn, Thomas V. Schumacher, Merav Ben-David This project was primarily funded by THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Juneau Field Office, Juneau, Alaska and THE ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME. Division of Wildlife, Douglas, Alaska ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Kim Hastings, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, assisted in arranging the grant, provided peer review of the study plan, and made many useful comments on the manuscript. Joe McClung captained the FWS boat at Point Couverden. Staff of the Tongass National Forest, U.S. Forest Service, assisted with many aspects of the project. Glenn Ith and Jim Brainerd arranged for facilities and vehicles on the Petersburg District. On the Thorne Bay District, Susan Howell and Ray Slayton assisted with logistics and the fieldwork. Dennis Chester assisted with the trapping at Point Couverden. Steve Lewis, Richard Lowell, Paul Converse, Chad Rice, and Mary Mecci from the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, provided field or administrative support. Kimberly Titus provided supervision and project review. Grey Pendleton developed the population estimator and provided statistical review. Becky Strauch computed the variance for the study area estimates. Cathy Brown edited the report. The Alaska Department of Fish and Game administers all programs and activities free from discrimination on the basis of race, religion, color, natural origin, age, sex, marital status, pregnancy, parenthood, or disability. For information on alternative formats for this and other department publications, please contact the department ADA Coordinator at [voice] 907-465­ 4120, telecommunications device for the deaf [TDD] 1-800-478-3648, or fax 907-465-6078.
    [Show full text]
  • Wrangell Island Analysis Report 1 Stikine Area United States Forest Service Wrangell Ranger District
    Wrangell Island Analysis Report Report Overview The purpose of this report is to solicit public review and comment and provide a context for future project decisions on National Forest lands on Wrangell Island over the next ten years. It presents an overview of public comments, resource conditions, and possible projects (roads and access management, timber harvest, recreation). This report describes Wrangell Island old growth reserves and other management prescriptions designated by the Forest Plan (TLMP). It describes wildlife travel corridors and recreation use across the island. It includes the results of a watershed analysis that identified sensitive watersheds and important fisheries on the island. Within this framework of Forest Plan prescriptions, resource conditions, and human use, an interdisciplinary team has suggested projects including: · Recreation trails and shelters. · Timber harvest proposals of one to five million board feet that avoid the most sensitive watersheds and allow consideration of scenery and wildlife values. · Road access management that considers wildlife and fisheries while maintaining access to potential timber sales and popular recreation sites. This report is organized as follows: · An introduction explaining why we wrote this report and how we intend to use it. · A summary of public comment and highlights of a Wrangell Island Analysis conducted by the 1997 Wrangell High School Environmental Sciences Class. · A summary of landscape design objectives from the Forest Plan. · Descriptions of the seven landscape
    [Show full text]
  • 2021-2022 Proposal Book
    Department of Fish and Game BOARDS SUPPORT SECTION Headquarters Office 1255 West 8th Street P.O. Box 115526 Juneau, Alaska 99811-5526 Main: 907.465.4110 Fax: 907.465.6094 Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.adfg.alaska.gov/index.cfm?adfg=fisheriesboard.main Reviewer Letter PLEASE READ CAREFULLY July 2021 The Alaska Board of Fisheries (board) will consider this book of regulatory proposals at its meetings from November 2021 through March 2022. The proposals concern changes to the state’s fishing regulations submitted timely by members of the public, organizations, advisory committees, and ADF&G staff. Proposals are published essentially as received, with the exception of minor edits and removal of graphics and web links. If you submitted a proposal and find the published version does not reflect your intent, please contact Boards Support as soon as possible. COVID-19 Mitigation Plan. During its 2020/2021 meeting cycle, due to the COVID-19 global pandemic the board postponed its regulatory meetings to 2021/2022. As we move into the 2021/2022 meeting cycle, both the board and ADF&G intend to return to in-person meetings as identified in this book. However, at the time of this publication it is difficult to predict what complications related to COVID-19 will persist as we approach the meetings. Individuals wishing to attend in-person meetings are advised ADF&G will employ a COVID-19 mitigation plan that complies with the state and hosting community mitigation requirements. While the details of that plan remain to be finalized, it will allow for a range of mitigation measures depending on the status of COVID-19 in the state and meeting community.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Division
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIC DIVISION [U.S.G.S. R/V Don J. Miller II] COMBINED DESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITS AND CORRELATION OF MAP UNITS FOR THE PETERSBURG-WRANGELL AREA 1:63,360-SCALE GEOLOGIC MAPS, SOUTHEASTERN ALASKA Open-File Report 97-156-O By David A. Brew and Donald J. Grybeck This report has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Post-technical-review version 98.01.12.0930 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Combined Description of Map Units and Correlation of Map Units for the Petersburg-Wrangell Area 1:63,360-Scale Geologic Maps, Southeastern Alaska By David A. Brew1 and Donald J. Grybeck2 Open-File Report 97-156-O This report has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 1 Research Geologist emeritus USGS, MS 904 Menlo Park, California 94025 2 Research Geologist USGS, 4200 University Drive Anchorage, A La ska 99508 CONTENTS Page Introduction 3 Sketch of Geologic and Tectonic Setting 5 Brief Description of Map Units 8 Description of Map Units 1 5 Acknowledgements 7 8 Cited and Selected References 7 9 Indices Alphabetical Index of Map Symbols, giving their unit names and page numbers of their descriptions 97 Alphabetical Index of Unit Names, giving the page numbers of their descriptions and their map symbols 102 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register
    ^ o n a l ^ . FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 2 'Sfc* # 1 9 3 4 ç f ÿ * NUMBER 29 ^ ü N n t o * Washington, Friday, February 12, 1937 PRESIDENT IDF THE UNITED STATES. news Bay, within a line extending from the east shore of Kuskokwim Bay at the parallel of 59 degrees north Executive O rder latitude to Cape Avinof. The mouth of the Kuskokwim REVOCATION OF PARAGRAPH 9, SUBDIVISION HI, SCHEDULE A, CIVIL River shall be considered as at a straight line extending SERVICE RULES from a marker erected for the purpose at Beacon Point WHEREAS by Executive Order o f November 18, 1905, the to another marker at Popokamute. position of one examiner of tobacco in the Customs Service 2. Commercial fishing for salmon shall be conducted at the port of Chicago was exempted from the competitive solely by drift gill nets and set nets: Provided, That this classified service; and shall not apply (a) to the use of purse seines in Kuskokwim WHEREAS the Treasury Department exercised its pre­ Bay, exclusive of Goodnews Bay, between 59 degrees north rogative under section 3 of Civil Service Rule n by filling latitude and 59 degrees 40 minutes north latitude westward that position as competitive classified positions are filled, to Cape Avinof, and (b) to the use of fish wheels in the thus rendering the exemption unnecessary: Yukon and Kuskokwim Rivers by native Indians and bona NOW, THEREFORE, by virtue of and pursuant to the fide permanent white residents along those rivers for the authority vested in me by the Civil Service Act (22 Stat.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C Roadless Areas
    Appendix C Appendix C Roadless Areas Table of Contents Stikine Area 201 Fanshaw .................................................................................... C-6 202 Spires ........................................................................................ C-8 204 Madan ..................................................................................... C-10 205 Aaron ....................................................................................... C-12 206 Cone ........................................................................................ C-14 207 Harding .................................................................................... C-16 208 Bradfield .................................................................................. C-18 209 Anan ........................................................................................ C-20 210 Frosty ...................................................................................... C-22 211 North Kupreanof ...................................................................... C-24 212 Missionary ............................................................................... C-26 213 Five Mile .................................................................................. C-28 214 South Kupreanof ...................................................................... C-30 215 Castle ...................................................................................... C-32 216 Lindenberg ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Prioritization KKMEZW “Middle” Islands Conservation Prioritization KKMEZW “Middle” Islands
    CONSERVATION PRIORITIZATION OF KKMEZW “MIDDLE” ISLANDS Identifying Opportunities for Conservation Prepared by the Southeast Alaska Land Trust With support from U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Alaska Coastal Conservation Program October 2017 Conservation Prioritization KKMEZW “Middle” Islands Conservation Prioritization KKMEZW “Middle” Islands IDENTIFYING OPPORTUN ITIES FOR CONSERVATI ON INTRODUCTION The goal of this conservation priority analysis is to identify private, native corporations/tribal, municipal, and state land on which SEAL Trust could potentially hold conservation easements, deed restrictions, or purchase as fee-simple conservation properties. SEAL Trust wants to take a strategic approach in exploring additional conservation opportunities within the Kuiu, Kupreanof, Mitkof, Etolin, Zarembo, and Wrangell (KKMEZW) Islands HUC, more commonly known as the “Middle Islands,” and throughout all of Southeast Alaska. The properties will be identified through use of landowner and resource data combined and prioritized in a geographic information system (GIS). The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) awarded the Southeast Alaska Land Trust (SEAL Trust) a Coastal Program grant in 2013 and 2014. SEAL Trust requested this grant to fund a conservation priority analysis of private property (defined as non-federal land) within the 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) #19010202, KKMEZW Islands (Map 1). This report and associated GIS maps are the products of that work. A similar prioritization was done for Prince of Wales Island in 2013. SEAL Trust currently holds two adjoining conservation easements within the KKMEZW Islands HUC, located on Kupreanof Island near the City of Kake. One easement covers 1,430 acres owned by the City of Kake and the other easement covers 1,127 acres owned primarily by Kake Tribal Corporation.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2021 to 06/30/2021 Tongass National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2021 to 06/30/2021 Tongass National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring Nationwide Gypsy Moth Management in the - Vegetation management Completed Actual: 11/28/2012 01/2013 Susan Ellsworth United States: A Cooperative (other than forest products) 775-355-5313 Approach [email protected]. EIS us *UPDATED* Description: The USDA Forest Service and Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service are analyzing a range of strategies for controlling gypsy moth damage to forests and trees in the United States. Web Link: http://www.na.fs.fed.us/wv/eis/ Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Nationwide. Locatable Mining Rule - 36 CFR - Regulations, Directives, In Progress: Expected:12/2021 12/2021 Sarah Shoemaker 228, subpart A. Orders NOI in Federal Register 907-586-7886 EIS 09/13/2018 [email protected] d.us *UPDATED* Est. DEIS NOA in Federal Register 03/2021 Description: The U.S. Department of Agriculture proposes revisions to its regulations at 36 CFR 228, Subpart A governing locatable minerals operations on National Forest System lands.A draft EIS & proposed rule should be available for review/comment in late 2020 Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=57214 Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. These regulations apply to all NFS lands open to mineral entry under the US mining laws.
    [Show full text]
  • [Anadian National Steamships S.S
    DESCRIPTIVE INIMISEIEMPROL SUGGESTIONS ON ME MEMO, TO ALASKA [ANADIAN NATIONAL STEAMSHIPS S.S. "PRINCE RUPERT", "PRINCE GEORGE" AND "PRINCE ROBERT" ACCOMMODATION AND EQUIPMENT The Canadian National steamers "Prince Rupert" and "Prince George," in the regu- lar Alaska service, are sister ships, with an average running speed of sixteen knots. They have a length of three hundred and eighteen feet with forty-two feet beam and were specially designed for the Northern British Columbia and Alaska service. Oil fuel is used. There are four decks, known as the boat, shade, shelter and main decks, and accom- modation for two hundred and eight first- class passengers in ninety-eight two-berth staterooms and six de luxe suites. The din- ing saloon seats 122. The S.S. "Prince Robert" making the special 11-day cruises has a length of 384 feet and a speed of 221/2 knots. The pas- senger accommodation for 331 first class passengers is located on three of her six decks. The public rooms are spacious and handsomely decorated, a special feature being the large observation room on "B" deck, from which unobstructed view is afforded through broad windows. The ac- commodation includes special suites de luxe with twin-beds and private bathroom, two- berth rooms with private shower and the remainder of the rooms have two berths. Page Two This Booklet Describes, in a concise manner, the water- ways traversed and the ports of call made by Canadian National Steam- ers, S.S. "Prince Robert," S.S. "Prince George" and S.S. "Prince Rupert." Explains the necessary official formali- ties in passing from one country to another, that, with understanding, they may prove less irksome.
    [Show full text]