DOCSLIB.ORG

Petition to List the Alexander Archipelago Wolf (Canis Lupus Ligoni) As Threatened Or Endangered Under the United States Endangered Species Act

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Petition to List the Alexander Archipelago Wolf (Canis Lupus Ligoni) As Threatened Or Endangered Under the United States Endangered Species Act BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF INTERIOR PETITION TO LIST THE ALEXANDER ARCHIPELAGO WOLF (CANIS LUPUS LIGONI) AS THREATENED OR ENDANGERED UNDER THE UNITED STATES ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT © ROBIN SILVER CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, PETITIONER GREENPEACE, PETITIONER AUGUST 10, 2011 NOTICE OF PETITION Ken Salazar, Secretary of the Interior U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20240 Phone: (202) 208-3100 [email protected] Rowan Gould, Acting Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1849 C Street, NW, Mail Stop 3012 Washington, D.C. 20240 Phone: (202) 208-4717 [email protected] Geoffrey Haskett, Regional Director Alaska Regional Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1011 East Tudor Road Anchorage, AK 99503 [email protected] PETITIONERS Shaye Wolf, Ph.D. Rebecca Noblin, Alaska Director Center for Biological Diversity PO Box 100599 Anchorage, Alaska 99510-0599 [email protected] [email protected] Larry Edwards Greenpeace Box 6484 Sitka, Alaska 99835 [email protected] __________________________ Date this 10 day of August 2011 Petition to List the Alexander Archipelago Wolf, Page ii Pursuant to Section 4(b) of the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. §1533(b), Section 553(3) of the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. § 553(e), and 50 C.F.R. § 424.14(a), the Center for Biological Diversity and Greenpeace (collectively “Petitioners”) hereby petition the Secretary of the Interior, through the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“USFWS”), to list the Alexander Archipelago wolf (Canis lupus ligoni) as a threatened or endangered species and to designate critical habitat to ensure its survival and recovery. The Center for Biological Diversity works through science, law, and policy to secure a future for all species, great or small, hovering on the brink of extinction. The Center has 41,000 members throughout Alaska and the United States. The Center and its members are concerned with the conservation of endangered species, including the Alexander Archipelago wolf, and the effective implementation of the ESA. Greenpeace, Inc. is a non-profit environmental organization, and its mission is to raise public awareness of environmental problems and promote changes that are essential to a green and peaceful future. The organization’s involvement in forest issues concerning the National Forest System generally and particularly the Tongass National Forest and other forests of Southeast Alaska dates back to the early 1990s. Greenpeace’s concerns have included the effects of logging-associated road construction on the Alexander Archipelago wolf in particular, as well as on ecosystems, roadless areas, fish, wildlife and hunting, and the protection of the last remnants of old-growth forest in the United States. USFWS has jurisdiction over this petition. This petition sets in motion a specific process, placing definite response requirements on USFWS. Specifically, USFWS must issue an initial finding as to whether the petition “presents substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be warranted.” 16 U.S.C. § 1533(b)(3)(A). USFWS must make this initial finding “[t]o the maximum extent practicable, within 90 days after receiving the petition.” Id. Petitioners need not demonstrate that a listing is warranted; rather, Petitioners must only present information demonstrating that such listing may be warranted. While Petitioners believe that the best available science demonstrates that listing the Alexander Archipelago wolf as endangered is in fact warranted, there can be no reasonable dispute that the available information indicates that listing the species as either threatened or endangered may be warranted. As such, USFWS must promptly make a positive initial finding on the petition and commence a status review as required by 16 U.S.C. § 1533(b)(3)(B). The term “species” is defined broadly under the ESA to include “any subspecies of fish or wildlife or plants and any distinct population segment of any species of vertebrate fish or wildlife which interbreeds when mature.” 16 U.S.C. § 1532 (16). A Distinct Population Segment (“DPS”) of a vertebrate species can be protected as a “species” under the ESA even though it has not formally been described as a separate “species” or “subspecies” in the scientific literature. A species may be composed of several DPSs, some or all of which warrant listing under the ESA. As described in this petition, the Alexander Archipelago wolf (Canis lupus ligoni) of Southeast Alaska is a currently recognized subspecies of the gray wolf and should be considered for listing as a distinct subspecies. While we believe that the petition clearly demonstrates that the Alexander Archipelago wolf is threatened or endangered throughout its range in Southeast Petition to List the Alexander Archipelago Wolf, Page iii Alaska, we request that the USFWS recognize Prince of Wales Island as a significant portion of the range and consider the entire subspecies for listing based on the criteria that the subspecies is threatened or endangered “throughout all or a significant portion of its range.” (16 U.S.C. § 1532). We also request that USFWS consider Prince of Wales Island wolves as a DPS of the Alexander Archipelago wolf based on marked differences in genetic, physical, and ecological characteristics, where Prince of Wales Island includes the associated islands of Kosciusko, Tuxekan, Heceta, Suemez, Dall, and others proximate to Prince of Wales. In this Petition, we follow the accepted taxonomic classification of Canis lupus ligoni as a distinct subspecies encompassing the coastal wolves of island and mainland Southeast Alaska. However, we recognize that the taxonomic relationship between coastal wolves of Southeast Alaska and British Columbia is still being resolved. Therefore, we have included information on natural history, population status, and threats to wolves of British Columbia in Appendix A, in the event that the USFWS determines that the coastal wolves of Southeast Alaska and British Columbia may be part of the same subspecies. Petition to List the Alexander Archipelago Wolf, Page iv TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 1 NATURAL HISTORY & BIOLOGY OF THE ALEXANDER ARCHIPELAGO WOLF .. 4 I. SPECIES DESCRIPTION......................................................................................................................................4 II. SYSTEMATICS...................................................................................................................................................4 A. Taxonomy....................................................................................................................................................4 1. The Alexander Archipelago wolf is a subspecies of the gray wolf......................................................................... 4 2. The wolves on Prince of Wales Island appear to be a distinct population segment of the Alexander Archipelago wolf...................................................................................................................................................................... 5 3. The coastal wolves of British Columbia may be related to Alexander Archipelago wolves ..................................6 B. Evolutionary History...................................................................................................................................7 III. DISTRIBUTION..................................................................................................................................................7 IV. ABUNDANCE AND POPULATION TRENDS..........................................................................................................8 A. Population size............................................................................................................................................8 B. Population trends........................................................................................................................................9 V. HABITAT USE ................................................................................................................................................10 VI. PACK SIZE, HOME RANGE AND DISPERSAL....................................................................................................13 A. Pack Size...................................................................................................................................................13 B. Home Range..............................................................................................................................................13 C. Dispersal...................................................................................................................................................14 VII. REPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOR ............................................................................................................................16 VIII. DIET AND FEEDING ECOLOGY ........................................................................................................................16 IX. CAUSES OF MORTALITY .................................................................................................................................17 A. Legal and Illegal Hunting and Trapping ..................................................................................................17
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Alaska Boundary Dispute
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository University of Calgary Press University of Calgary Press Open Access Books 2014 A historical and legal study of sovereignty in the Canadian north : terrestrial sovereignty, 1870–1939 Smith, Gordon W. University of Calgary Press "A historical and legal study of sovereignty in the Canadian north : terrestrial sovereignty, 1870–1939", Gordon W. Smith; edited by P. Whitney Lackenbauer. University of Calgary Press, Calgary, Alberta, 2014 http://hdl.handle.net/1880/50251 book http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 International Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca A HISTORICAL AND LEGAL STUDY OF SOVEREIGNTY IN THE CANADIAN NORTH: TERRESTRIAL SOVEREIGNTY, 1870–1939 By Gordon W. Smith, Edited by P. Whitney Lackenbauer ISBN 978-1-55238-774-0 THIS BOOK IS AN OPEN ACCESS E-BOOK. It is an electronic version of a book that can be purchased in physical form through any bookseller or on-line retailer, or from our distributors. Please support this open access publication by requesting that your university purchase a print copy of this book, or by purchasing a copy yourself. If you have any questions, please contact us at ucpress@ ucalgary.ca Cover Art: The artwork on the cover of this book is not open access and falls under traditional copyright provisions; it cannot be reproduced in any way without written permission of the artists and their agents. The cover can be displayed as a complete cover image for the purposes of publicizing this work, but the artwork cannot be extracted from the context of the cover of this specificwork without breaching the artist’s copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of Survey-Inventory Activities 1 July 1988-30 June 1989 .....ELK
    Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Wildlife Conservation Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Annual Report of Survey-Inventory Activities 1 July 1988-30 June 1989 .....ELK- Compiled and edited by Sid 0. Morsan, Publications Technician Vol XX, Part ill Project W-23-2, Study 13.0 May 1990 STATE OF ALASKA Steve Cowper, Governor DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME Don W. Collinsworth, Commissioner DIVISION OF WILDLIFE CONSERVATION W. Lewis Pamplin, Jr., Director W. Bruce Dinneford, Acting Planning Chief Persons intending to cite this material should obtain prior permis­ sion from the author(s) and/or the Alaska Department of Fish and Game. Because most reports deal with preliminary results of conti­ nuing studies, conclusions are tentative and should be identified as such. Due credit will be appreciated. Additional copies of this report, or reports on other species covered in this series may be obtained from: Publications Technician ADF&G, Wildlife Conservation P.O. Box 3-2000 Juneau, AK 99802 (907) 465-4190 The Alaska Department of Fish & Game operates all of its public pro­ grams and activities free from discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, or handicap. Because the department receives federal funding, any person who believes he or she has been discriminated against should write to: O.E.O., U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. 20240. TABLE OF CONTENTS .. ) Game Management Unit Map. • . • . • • .I . • ii Statewide Harvest and Population status • .iii Game Management Unit/Geographical Description GMU 3 - Islands of the Petersburg, Wrangell, and Kake areas • . • . • • . 1 GMU 8 - Kodiak, Afognak, and adjacent islands.
    [Show full text]
  • G. D. Eberlein, Michael Churkin, Jr., Claire Carter, H. C. Berg, and A. T. Ovenshine
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGY OF THE CRAIG QUADRANGLE, ALASKA By G. D. Eberlein, Michael Churkin, Jr., Claire Carter, H. C. Berg, and A. T. Ovenshine Open-File Report 83-91 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and strati graphic nomenclature Menlo Park, California 1983 Geology of the Craig Quadrangle, Alaska By G. D. Eberlein, Michael Churkin, Jr., Claire Carter, H. C. Berg, and A. T. Ovenshine Introduction This report consists of the following: 1) Geologic map (1:250,000) (Fig. 1); includes Figs. 2-4, index maps 2) Description of map units 3) Map showing key fossil and geochronology localities (Fig. 5) 4) Table listing key fossil collections 5) Correlation diagram showing Silurian and Lower Devonian facies changes in the northwestern part of the quadrangle (Fig. 6) 6) Sequence of Paleozoic restored cross sections within the Alexander terrane showing a history of upward shoaling volcanic-arc activity (Fig. 7). The Craig quadrangle contains parts of three northwest-trending tectonostratigraphic terranes (Berg and others, 1972, 1978). From southwest to northeast they are the Alexander terrane, the Gravina-Nutzotin belt, and the Taku terrane. The Alexander terrane of Paleozoic sedimentary and volcanic rocks, and Paleozoic and Mesozoic plutonic rocks, underlies the Prince of Wales Island region southwest of Clarence Strait. Supracrustal rocks of the Alexander terrane range in age from Early Ordovician into the Pennsylvanian, are unmetamorphosed and richly fossiliferous, and aopear to stratigraphically overlie pre-Middle Ordovician metamorphic rocks of the Wales Group (Eberlein and Churkin, 1970).
    [Show full text]
  • No Name Bay and Other Misnomers in This Issue Richard Carstensen Kids Page
    News and Views from Discovery Southeast Fall 1999 No Name Bay and other misnomers In this issue Richard Carstensen Kids Page ....................................... 7 Meet the New Naturalists ............. 8 “A naturalist is somebody that knows a lot of names.” Kayaker from Cali- Thoughts on Nature Studies ........ 10 fornia, met on Halibut Island, mouth of Port Frederick, 1994. I became a naturalist at Juneau’s Eagle Beach in the 1980s. Although I didn’t think to wonder about it at the time, Eagle Beach and Eagle River To understand Eagle Beach I had to map derive their names not from any surfeit of eagles but from the Eagle Gla- it, and to situate the thousands of notes I took cier up valley. The glacier itself was named by naval commander Richard there, I needed place names. On my 1983 Meade in 1869 “because of this feature’s resemblance to an eagle with map of the scout camp area there are 25 or so outstretched wings.” 1 names, only one of which pre-dated my 12- Meade’s view of Eagle Glacier was almost certainly from saltwater. year residence there. Others I had to invent. Today there are few places in Favorite Channel from which its corrugated Shunning IWGNs (Important White Guy icefalls can be seen, and what we do see looks nothing like an eagle. Over Names), I tried to apply names that actually the last 130 years, the glacier surface has downwasted hundreds of feet. carried information about places. “Dowitcher Staring at my photos of the glacier from M/V Columbia, trying to restore Slough,” clogged with river mud, drew flocks the 1869 ice levels in my imagination, I catch teasing glimpses of Meade’s of the little syringe-billed probers.
    [Show full text]
  • Removing the Gray Wolf (Canis Lupus) from the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
    Billing Code 4333-15 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 [Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2018–0097; FF09E22000 FXES1113090FEDR 212] RIN 1018–BD60 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Removing the Gray Wolf (Canis lupus) from the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTIONS: Final rule and notice of petition finding. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service or USFWS), have evaluated the classification status of the gray wolf (Canis lupus) entities currently listed in the lower 48 United States and Mexico under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). Based on our evaluation, we are removing the gray wolf entities in the lower 48 United States and Mexico, except for the Mexican wolf (C. l. baileyi), that are currently on the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife. We are taking this action because the best available scientific and 1 commercial data available establish that the gray wolf entities in the lower 48 United States do not meet the definitions of a threatened species or an endangered species under the Act. The effect of this rulemaking action is that C. lupus is not classified as a threatened or endangered species under the Act. This rule does not have any effect on the separate listing of the Mexican wolf subspecies (Canis lupus baileyi) as endangered under the Act. In addition, we announce a 90-day finding on a petition to maintain protections for the gray wolf in the lower 48 United States as endangered or threatened distinct population segments.
    [Show full text]
  • Wolves in the Lower 48 States
    BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR PETITION FOR A NATIONAL RECOVERY PLAN FOR THE WOLF (CANIS LUPUS) IN THE CONTERMINOUS UNITED STATES OUTSIDE THE SOUTHWEST UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT Center for Biological Diversity Photo: Gary Kramer, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2 July 20, 2010 Ken Salazar, Secretary Rowan Gould, Acting Director Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Main Interior Building 1849 C Street NW 18th and C Streets, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20240 Washington, D.C. 20240 Re: Petition to the U.S. Department of Interior and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, for Development of a Recovery Plan for the Gray Wolf (Canis lupus) in the Conterminous United States Outside of the Southwest. Dear Secretary Salazar and Acting Director Gould: Pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 1533(f) of the Endangered Species Act and section 5 U.S.C. § 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act, the Center for Biological Diversity (“Center”) hereby petitions the U.S. Department of the Interior (“DOI”), by and through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“Service”), to develop a recovery plan for the gray wolf (Canis lupus) in the conterminous United States outside of the Southwest. Our petition excludes the Southwest on the premise that the Mexican gray wolf (Canis lupus baileyi) will be listed either as a subspecies or distinct population segment, as requested in the Center’s Mexican gray wolf listing petition of August 11, 2009. Should this not have occurred by the time the Service initiates development of a recovery plan for the wolf in the conterminous U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • B.Sc. II YEAR CHORDATA
    B.Sc. II YEAR CHORDATA CHORDATA 16SCCZO3 Dr. R. JENNI & Dr. R. DHANAPAL DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY M. R. GOVT. ARTS COLLEGE MANNARGUDI CONTENTS CHORDATA COURSE CODE: 16SCCZO3 Block and Unit title Block I (Primitive chordates) 1 Origin of chordates: Introduction and charterers of chordates. Classification of chordates up to order level. 2 Hemichordates: General characters and classification up to order level. Study of Balanoglossus and its affinities. 3 Urochordata: General characters and classification up to order level. Study of Herdmania and its affinities. 4 Cephalochordates: General characters and classification up to order level. Study of Branchiostoma (Amphioxus) and its affinities. 5 Cyclostomata (Agnatha) General characters and classification up to order level. Study of Petromyzon and its affinities. Block II (Lower chordates) 6 Fishes: General characters and classification up to order level. Types of scales and fins of fishes, Scoliodon as type study, migration and parental care in fishes. 7 Amphibians: General characters and classification up to order level, Rana tigrina as type study, parental care, neoteny and paedogenesis. 8 Reptilia: General characters and classification up to order level, extinct reptiles. Uromastix as type study. Identification of poisonous and non-poisonous snakes and biting mechanism of snakes. 9 Aves: General characters and classification up to order level. Study of Columba (Pigeon) and Characters of Archaeopteryx. Flight adaptations & bird migration. 10 Mammalia: General characters and classification up
    [Show full text]
  • Hyaenodontidae (Creodonta, Mammalia) and the Position of Systematics in Evolutionary Biology
    Hyaenodontidae (Creodonta, Mammalia) and the Position of Systematics in Evolutionary Biology by Paul David Polly B.A. (University of Texas at Austin) 1987 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Paleontology in the GRADUATE DIVISION of the UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA at BERKELEY Committee in charge: Professor William A. Clemens, Chair Professor Kevin Padian Professor James L. Patton Professor F. Clark Howell 1993 Hyaenodontidae (Creodonta, Mammalia) and the Position of Systematics in Evolutionary Biology © 1993 by Paul David Polly To P. Reid Hamilton, in memory. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ix Acknowledgments xi Chapter One--Revolution and Evolution in Taxonomy: Mammalian Classification Before and After Darwin 1 Introduction 2 The Beginning of Modern Taxonomy: Linnaeus and his Predecessors 5 Cuvier's Classification 10 Owen's Classification 18 Post-Darwinian Taxonomy: Revolution and Evolution in Classification 24 Kovalevskii's Classification 25 Huxley's Classification 28 Cope's Classification 33 Early 20th Century Taxonomy 42 Simpson and the Evolutionary Synthesis 46 A Box Model of Classification 48 The Content of Simpson's 1945 Classification 50 Conclusion 52 Acknowledgments 56 Bibliography 56 Figures 69 Chapter Two: Hyaenodontidae (Creodonta, Mammalia) from the Early Eocene Four Mile Fauna and Their Biostratigraphic Implications 78 Abstract 79 Introduction 79 Materials and Methods 80 iv Systematic Paleontology 80 The Four Mile Fauna and Wasatchian Biostratigraphic Zonation 84 Conclusion 86 Acknowledgments 86 Bibliography 86 Figures 87 Chapter Three: A New Genus Eurotherium (Creodonta, Mammalia) in Reference to Taxonomic Problems with Some Eocene Hyaenodontids from Eurasia (With B. Lange-Badré) 89 Résumé 90 Abstract 90 Version française abrégéé 90 Introduction 93 Acknowledgments 96 Bibliography 96 Table 3.1: Original and Current Usages of Genera and Species 99 Table 3.2: Species Currently Included in Genera Discussed in Text 101 Chapter Four: The skeleton of Gazinocyon vulpeculus n.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Kayaking on the Petersburg
    SeaSea KayakingKayaking onon thethe PetersburgPetersburg RangerRanger DistrictDistrict Routes Included in Handout Petersburg to Kake via north shore of Kupreanof Island Petersburg to Kake via south shore of Kupreanof Island LeConte Bay Loop Thomas Bay Loop Northwest Kuiu Island Loop Duncan Canal Loop Leave No Trace (LNT) information Tongass National Forest Petersburg Ranger District P.O. Box 1328 Petersburg AK. 99833 Sea Kayaking in the Petersburg Area The Petersburg area offers outstanding paddling opportunities. From an iceberg filled fjord in LeConte Bay to the Keku Islands this remote area has hundreds of miles of shoreline to explore. But Alaska is not a forgiving place, being remote, having cold water, large tides and rug- ged terrain means help is not just around the corner. One needs to be experienced in both paddling and wilderness camping. There are not established campsites and we are trying to keep them from forming. To help ensure these wild areas retain their naturalness it’s best to camp on the durable surfaces of the beach and not damage the fragile uplands vegetation. This booklet will begin to help you plan an enjoyable and safe pad- dling tour. The first part contains information on what paddlers should expect in this area and some safety guidelines. The second part will help in planning a tour. The principles of Leave No Trace Camping are presented. These are suggestions on how a person can enjoy an area without damaging it and leave it pristine for years to come. Listed are over 30 Leave No Trace campsites and several possible paddling routes in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Occurrence of Wildlife on the Coronation and Spani'sh Islands
    ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND G~lli JUNEAU, ALASKA STATE OF ALASKA Bill Sheffield, Governor DEPARTMENT OF FISH 1\ND GA1-1E Don Collinsworth, Commissioner DIVISION OF GAME Lewis Pamplin, Director OCCURRENCE OF WILDLIFE ON THE CORONATION AND SPANI'SH ISLANDS. ALASKA BY Charles R. Land E. L. Young, Jr. Petersburg Area Report No. 84-1 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section SUMMARY. 1 OBJECTIVES 2 BACKGROUND 3 C') STUDY AREA 3 ~ <0 C\1 0 PROCEDURES 7 C\1 ~ 0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 8 0 1.{) 1.{) RECOMMENDATIONS. 16 """'C') C') ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 17 LITERATURE CITED 18 FIGURES. 19 TABLES 21 APPENDIX 26 SUMMARY During the period of February to August 1983, a project was initiated to determine the status of the wildlife populations of Coronation Island. Hunting and trapping seasons have been closed for many years and deer and furbearer populations were of primary concern. Our studies indicate that the deer population is high and opening the season is recommended. There appeared to be numerous mink and river otters, and again, opening the season is advised. Forty-eight species of birds were identified during the study. Fourteen species were identified as known or probable nesters. No evidence of wolves was found on the island, although there was a transplant in the 1960's. Terrestrial mammals observed included Sitka black-tailed deer, mink, river otter, Sitka deer mouse, Coronation Island vole, and vagrant shrew. Sea otters were commonly observed and harbor seals and Steller sea lions were numerous. Humpback whales were seen in Aats Bay and Egg Harbor as well as offshore.
    [Show full text]
  • Southeast Alaska Mid-Region Access Port and Ferry Terminal Technical Memorandum
    S A M-R A P Ferr T T M Prepared for Fr Highw An Through R Pecci Associates, I. 825 Custer Avenue Helena, Montana 59604 (406)447-5000 www.rpa-hln.com Prepared by T Gos Associates, I. 1201 Western Avenue, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98101 www.glosten.com Pametri, I. 700 NE Multnomah, Suite 1000 Portland, OR 97232-4110 T. 503.233.2400 F, 503.233.4825 www.parametrix.com CITATION The Glosten Associates, Inc., Parametrix, Inc. 2011. Southeast Alaska Mid-Region Access Port and Ferry Terminal Technical Memorandum. Prepared by The Glosten Associates, Inc., Seattle, Washington, Parametrix, Inc., Portland, Oregon. April 2011. Port and Ferry Terminal Technical Memorandum TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... ES-1 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Purpose of the Mid-Region Access Study ......................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Southeast Alaska Mid-Region Access Study Corridors ..................................................... 1-3 1.2.1 Bradfield Canal Corridor ....................................................................................... 1-3 1.2.2 Stikine River Corridor ........................................................................................... 1-5 1.2.3 Aaron Creek Corridor............................................................................................ 1-5 1.3 Characteristics
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Southeast Area Operational Forest Inventory for State Forest and General Use Lands
    Southern Southeast Area Operational Forest Inventory For State Forest And General Use Lands February 9, 2016 State of Alaska Department of Natural Resources Division of Forestry Table of Contents I. Executive Summary 3 II. Introduction and Background 3 A. Purpose 3 B. Background 3 C. Lands included in inventory 4 III. Methods 4 IV. Results 5 A. Net Timber Base 5 1. Gross acreage available for timber management 5 2. Net acreage available for timber management 5 B. Annual Allowable Cut Analysis 8 1. Assumptions 8 2. Annual allowable cut area calculation 10 3. Annual allowable cut volume calculation 10 4. Age class distribution 10 Appendices Appendix 1 Site-specific considerations by subunit 11 Appendix 2 Data base dictionary 19 Appendix 3 References 22 Appendix 4 Vicinity Maps of Inventory (12 Pages) End List of Figures and Tables Table 1. Timber Type Summary 8 SSE Inventory Report 2 February 9, 2016 Southern Southeast Area Operational Forest Inventory State Forest and General Use Lands February 9, 2016 I. Executive Summary This report presents findings from a forest inventory conducted on 69,790 acres of state land in Southeast Alaska. Timber types were mapped on state land available for timber management in the Southeast State Forest, the Prince of Wales Island Area Plan, Prince of Wales Island Area Plan Amendment and the Central-Southern Southeast Area Plan. This inventory updates a draft report issued in 2011 by deleting lands identified for conveyance to the Wrangell Borough. The net timber base in the inventoried area is 44,196 acres and the annual allowable cut is estimated to be 11,200 thousand board feet (MBF) per year.
    [Show full text]