DOCSLIB.ORG

The Alaska Boundary Dispute

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Alaska Boundary Dispute University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository University of Calgary Press University of Calgary Press Open Access Books 2014 A historical and legal study of sovereignty in the Canadian north : terrestrial sovereignty, 1870–1939 Smith, Gordon W. University of Calgary Press "A historical and legal study of sovereignty in the Canadian north : terrestrial sovereignty, 1870–1939", Gordon W. Smith; edited by P. Whitney Lackenbauer. University of Calgary Press, Calgary, Alberta, 2014 http://hdl.handle.net/1880/50251 book http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 International Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca A HISTORICAL AND LEGAL STUDY OF SOVEREIGNTY IN THE CANADIAN NORTH: TERRESTRIAL SOVEREIGNTY, 1870–1939 By Gordon W. Smith, Edited by P. Whitney Lackenbauer ISBN 978-1-55238-774-0 THIS BOOK IS AN OPEN ACCESS E-BOOK. It is an electronic version of a book that can be purchased in physical form through any bookseller or on-line retailer, or from our distributors. Please support this open access publication by requesting that your university purchase a print copy of this book, or by purchasing a copy yourself. If you have any questions, please contact us at ucpress@ ucalgary.ca Cover Art: The artwork on the cover of this book is not open access and falls under traditional copyright provisions; it cannot be reproduced in any way without written permission of the artists and their agents. The cover can be displayed as a complete cover image for the purposes of publicizing this work, but the artwork cannot be extracted from the context of the cover of this specificwork without breaching the artist’s copyright. COPYRIGHT NOTICE: This open-access work is published under a Creative Commons licence. This means that you are free to copy, distribute, display or perform the work as long as you clearly attribute the work to its authors and publisher, that you do not use this work for any commercial gain in any form, and that you in no way alter, transform, or build on the work outside of its use in normal academic scholarship without our express permission. If you want to reuse or distribute the work, you must inform its new audience of the licence terms of this work. For more information, see details of the Creative Commons licence at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ UNDER THE CREATIVE UNDER THE CREATIVE COMMONS LICENCE YOU COMMONS LICENCE YOU MAY: MAY NOT: • read and store this document • gain financially from the work in any way; free of charge; • sell the work or seek monies in relation to the distribution • distribute it for personal use of the work; free of charge; • use the work in any commercial activity of any kind; • print sections of the work for • profit a third party indirectly via use or distribution of the work; personal use; • distribute in or through a commercial body (with the exception • read or perform parts of the of academic usage within educational institutions such as work in a context where no schools and universities); financial transactions take • reproduce, distribute, or store the cover image outside of its place. function as a cover of this work; • alter or build on the work outside of normal academic scholarship. Acknowledgement: We acknowledge the wording around open access used by Australian publisher, re.press, and thank them for giving us permission to adapt their wording to our policy http://www.re-press.org 5 71 The Alaska Boundary Disput e The Alaska boundary controversy had its origins in complications associated with the period of Russian dominion in Alaska. While explorers from western Europe were moving across the vast expanses of North America and up its Pacific coast towards the northwestern extremity of the continent, Russian adventurers were approaching the same region from the opposite direction, and they got there well in advance of their rivals. In 1639, only about sixty years after the Stroganovs and Yermak the Cossack started the great march from Muscovy eastward across Siberia, a small party under Andrei Kopilov is said to have reached the waters of the Pacific and founded the post of Okhotsk.1 The Cossack Simeon Dezhnev in 1648 sailed a vessel around the northeastern extremity of Siberia from the Kolyma River to south of the Anadyr, according to records discovered nearly one hundred years after the event is supposed to have taken place. He thus proved that Asia did not join North America in that region.2 There was desultory Russian activity around the Sea of Okhotsk and in Kamchatka Peninsula during the following years, but the next major advance came with the two great voyages of Vitus Bering. Acting on instructions given by Peter the Great just before his death in 1725, this Danish captain, with his lieutenant Alexei Chirkov, sailed from Kamchatka in 1728 and followed the Siberian coast through Bering Strait, reaching 67° 18' N latitude before turning back. In 1741, after years of delay, they set out from Kamchatka again. Although their two ships became separated, they both succeeded in reaching and cruising along the southern coast of Alaska and the Aleutian Islands, thus accomplishing the modern discovery of North America from the Asiatic side.3 After Bering’s second voyage, Russian explorers and traders sailed from Okhotsk and Kam- chatka to Alaskan waters in increasing numbers, and they gradually extended their activities along the Aleutian chain and to the mainland.4 Among the key events were the establishment of the first permanent Russian post at Three Saints Bay on Kodiak Island by Gregory Shelikhov in 1784, Gerassim Pribilov’s discovery of the Pribilov Islands in 1786, and Alexander Baranov’s establish- ment of a new headquarters, Mikhailovsk (later Novo Archangelsk), on the island of Sitka in 1799. The Russians were primarily interested in furs, especially those of the sea otter; in pursuit of this trade, they not only subdued the indigenous residents with much brutality but also fell into serious quarrels among themselves. They had also to withstand an increasing challenge from foreign rivals, notably British, Spanish, French, and American. In the latter part of the eighteenth century, Cook, Clarke, Portlock and Dixon, Meares, Vancouver, Pérez, Heceta, Quadra, Martinez, Haro, Fidal- go, Malaspina, Caamaño, La Pérouse, Marchand, and others were active in Alaskan waters and interested in the region.5 To eliminate inter- Fort Ross at Bodega Bay on the California necine strife among themselves, to combat the coast, this marking approximately the south- intrusions of foreign interlopers, and to main- ern limit of Russian enterprise in the region. tain better control and management of the Primarily to check the “secret and illicit traffic” fur trade, several leading Russian companies of foreigners, Emperor Alexander I issued a took the initiative and in 1798 consolidated sweeping ukase on 16 September 1821, which 72 into a single organization. On 8 July 1799, an purported to grant Russian subjects the exclu- imperial ukase issued by Emperor Paul I con- sive right to the “pursuits of commerce, whal- firmed the consolidation and granted the new ing, and fishery, and of all other industry on all organization the title “The Russian American islands, ports, and gulfs including the whole Company.” of the northwest coast of America, beginning The ukase bestowed upon the Russian from Behring’s Strait to the 51° of northern American Company a monopoly charter for latitude,” and also the Aleutian Islands and a period of twenty years over all enterprises, Kurile and other islands off the Siberian coast, including hunting, trading, settlement, and in- from Bering Strait to Urup Island in the Ku- dustry, on the coast of America north of 55° N riles at 45° 50'. The ukase also prohibited all latitude and the chain of islands extending foreign vessels from landing on all these coasts across the northern Pacific and southwards to and islands, and also from approaching them Japan. The company could make new discov- within one hundred “Italian miles,” on pain of eries not only north of 55° but south as well, confiscation.9 Nine days afterwards, the Tsar and it could claim and occupy the lands discov- issued a second charter to the Russian Amer- ered as Russian possessions if they were not al- ican Company, renewing the monopoly privil- ready the property of some other nation. It also eges it had been granted in 1799 for a further had judicial, military, and administrative au- period of twenty years. The area subject to the thority in these regions.6 As the British pointed monopoly would be governed by the ukase of out in the Fur Seals Arbitration, however, and 1821 rather than by that of 1799, and thus it as had been recognized in the United States at would extend down the Pacific coast of North an earlier time, the ukase was intended pri- America to 51° (i.e., the northern tip of Van- marily to regulate the activities of Russian sub- couver Island) rather than just to 55°.10 jects, rather than to interfere with the rights of Both the British and American govern- foreigners.7 ments protested strongly against these meas- The ukase did eliminate most of the quar- ures as quickly as possible after receiving of- reling among the Russian traders themselves, ficial notification of them. Although efforts to but it had little effect upon foreign traders coordinate their protests fell through because (mainly British and American) who came to of the evident conflict between their own Alaskan waters. As a result, officials of the Rus- claims, their separate negotiations soon caused sian American Company complained to their the Russian government to moderate its stand.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alaska Boundary Survey, Bill Rupe, and the Scottie
    KING GEORGE GOT DIARRHEA : THE YUKON -ALASKA BOUNDARY SURVEY , BILL RUPE , AND THE SCOTTIE CREEK DINEH Norman Alexander Easton Yukon College, Box 2799, 500 College Drive, Whitehorse, Yukon Territory, Canada Y1A 5K4; [email protected] ABSTRACT The imposition of the international boundary along the 141st meridian of longitude between Yukon and Alaska has separated the aboriginal Dineh of the region into two separate nation-states. This division holds serious implications for the continuity of identity and social relations between Native people across this border. This paper examines the history of the establishment of this border along its southern margin through the Scottie Creek valley, comparing the written record of the state surveyors with the oral history of the Scottie Creek Dineh. I argue that the evidence supports the notion that the Dineh of Scottie Creek, like elsewhere in the Yukon and Alaska, were both aware of and resistant to the implications of the boundary and refused to cede their rights to continued use and occupancy of both sides of the border. Concurrent with this history is that of William Rupe, the unacknowledged first trader in the Upper Tanana River basin, and his role in mediating the negotiations between gov- ernment surveyors and Dineh leaders. Despite the difficulties imposed by the border, Natives of the region continue to formulate a strong identity as Dineh, holding and practicing distinctive values and social relations that collectively are known as the Dineh Way. Keywords: Upper Tanana, aboriginal-state relations, 141st meridian, Yukon-Alaska history PRELUDE It is July 1997. I am atop Mount Dave, Yukon, just east guage.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the United States Fish Commission
    SALMON-TAGGING EXPERIMENTS IN ALASKA, 1924 AND 1925 1 .:I- By WILLIS H. RICH, Ph. D. Director, U. S. Biological Station, Seattle, Wash; .:I­ CONTENTS Page Introduction _ 109 Experiments in southeastern Alaska__hhu u __nn_h__u u u _ 116 Tagging record _ 116 Returns from experiments in Icy Strait__ n h_u u_..u u _ 119 Returns from experiments in Frederick Sound u huh _ 123 Returns from experiments in Chatham Strait; h u • _ 123 Returns from experiments in Sumner Strait, u_uuu .. u _ 128 Returns from experiments at Cape Muzon and Kaigani Point, ~ _ 135 Returns from experiments at Cape Chacon u n u h _ 137 Returns from experiments near Cape Fox and Duke Islandu _ 141 Variations in returns of tagged fish; h _u u n n h n __ h u_ 143 Conelusions _ 144 Experiments at Port Moller, 1925un__h_uu uu __ 145 INTRODUCTION The extensive salmon-tagging experiments conducted during 1922 and 1923 2 in the region of the Alaska Peninsula proved so productive of information, both of scientific interest and of practical application in the care of these fisheries, that it was considered desirable to undertake similar investigations in other districts; Accordingly, experiments were carried on in southeastern Alaska in 1924 and again in 1925. In 1925, also, at the request of one of the companies engaged in packing salmon in the Port Moller district, along the northern shore of the Alaska Penin­ sula, the work done there in 1922 was repeated. The results of these experiments form the basis for the following report.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Southeast Inside Commercial Sablefish Fishery and Survey Activities in Southeast Alaska, 2013
    Fishery Management Report No. 14-39 Southern Southeast Inside Commercial Sablefish Fishery and Survey Activities in Southeast Alaska, 2013 by Jennifer Stahl, Kamala Carroll, and Kristen Green October 2014 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Divisions of Sport Fish and Commercial Fisheries Symbols and Abbreviations The following symbols and abbreviations, and others approved for the Système International d'Unités (SI), are used without definition in the following reports by the Divisions of Sport Fish and of Commercial Fisheries: Fishery Manuscripts, Fishery Data Series Reports, Fishery Management Reports, and Special Publications. All others, including deviations from definitions listed below, are noted in the text at first mention, as well as in the titles or footnotes of tables, and in figure or figure captions. Weights and measures (metric) General Mathematics, statistics centimeter cm Alaska Administrative all standard mathematical deciliter dL Code AAC signs, symbols and gram g all commonly accepted abbreviations hectare ha abbreviations e.g., Mr., Mrs., alternate hypothesis HA kilogram kg AM, PM, etc. base of natural logarithm e kilometer km all commonly accepted catch per unit effort CPUE liter L professional titles e.g., Dr., Ph.D., coefficient of variation CV meter m R.N., etc. common test statistics (F, t, χ2, etc.) milliliter mL at @ confidence interval CI millimeter mm compass directions: correlation coefficient east E (multiple) R Weights and measures (English) north N correlation coefficient cubic feet per second ft3/s south S (simple) r foot ft west W covariance cov gallon gal copyright degree (angular ) ° inch in corporate suffixes: degrees of freedom df mile mi Company Co.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical and Legal Study of Sovereignty in the Canadian North : Terrestrial Sovereignty, 1870–1939
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository University of Calgary Press University of Calgary Press Open Access Books 2014 A historical and legal study of sovereignty in the Canadian north : terrestrial sovereignty, 1870–1939 Smith, Gordon W. University of Calgary Press "A historical and legal study of sovereignty in the Canadian north : terrestrial sovereignty, 1870–1939", Gordon W. Smith; edited by P. Whitney Lackenbauer. University of Calgary Press, Calgary, Alberta, 2014 http://hdl.handle.net/1880/50251 book http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 International Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca A HISTORICAL AND LEGAL STUDY OF SOVEREIGNTY IN THE CANADIAN NORTH: TERRESTRIAL SOVEREIGNTY, 1870–1939 By Gordon W. Smith, Edited by P. Whitney Lackenbauer ISBN 978-1-55238-774-0 THIS BOOK IS AN OPEN ACCESS E-BOOK. It is an electronic version of a book that can be purchased in physical form through any bookseller or on-line retailer, or from our distributors. Please support this open access publication by requesting that your university purchase a print copy of this book, or by purchasing a copy yourself. If you have any questions, please contact us at ucpress@ ucalgary.ca Cover Art: The artwork on the cover of this book is not open access and falls under traditional copyright provisions; it cannot be reproduced in any way without written permission of the artists and their agents. The cover can be displayed as a complete cover image for the purposes of publicizing this work, but the artwork cannot be extracted from the context of the cover of this specificwork without breaching the artist’s copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\A Projects\AAA IBLA Decs\145IBLA\L014-029.Wpd
    HAINES BOROUGH ASSEMBLY, ET AL. IBLA 95-496, etc. 1/ Decided June 30, 1998 Consolidated appeals from a Decision of the Anchorage District Office, Bureau of Land Management, Alaska, approving issuance of commercial special recreation use permits AA-76601 and AA-77475. Affirmed. 1. Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976: Permits--Public Lands: Special Use Permits--Special Use Permits The Bureau of Land Management has discretion under 43 U.S.C. § 1732(b) (1994) and 43 C.F.R. Subpart 8372 to issue special recreation permits for commercial helicopter landings on public lands and to set permit conditions. There must be a compelling reason for modification or reversal of an exercise of this discretionary authority. Mere differences of opinion provide no basis for reversal, and the Board will affirm a decision exercising this authority if the decision is reasonable and supported by the record. 2. Environmental Policy Act--Environmental Quality: Environmental Statements-- National Environmental Policy Act of 1969: Environmental Statements-- National Environmental Policy Act of 1969: Finding of No Significant Impact A BLM finding of no significant impact for a proposed action (allowing landings of helicopters on glaciers on BLM lands) will be affirmed on appeal where BLM took a ____________________________________ 1/ This Decision disposes of the following appeals: Haines Borough Assembly, IBLA 95-496; Lynn Canal Conservation, Inc., IBLA 95-509; City of Skagway, IBLA 95-531; George Figdor, IBLA 95-540; Timothy R. June, IBLA 95-541; Chilkat Indian Village, IBLA 95-542; Fred M. Beeks, IBLA 95-571; Eva J. Beeks, IBLA 95-572; Lani S.
    [Show full text]
  • Routes to Riches 2015 1 Danielhenryalaska.Com
    Routes to Riches 2015 1 danielhenryalaska.com Routes to Riches Daniel Lee Henry [email protected] A ground squirrel robe nearly smothered northern Tlingits’ nascent trust in their newly-landed missionaries. Long-time trading ties with Southern Tutchone and Interior Tlingit funneled wealth to Native residents of the upper Lynn Canal. Luxurious furs from the frigid north brought prices many times that of local pelts. For example, while the coastal red fox fur was worth $1.75 in “San Francisco dollars” in 1883, a Yukon silver fox brought up to $50 (about $1200 in 2015). Several times a year, Tlingit expeditions traversed routes considered secret until local leaders revealed their existence to Russians and Americans in the mid-nineteenth century. A day’s paddle to the upper Chilkat River brought travelers to a trail leading over through barrier coastal mountains into the vast, rolling subarctic Interior. On the eastern route, packers left Dyea at the terminus of Taiya Inlet and slogged a twenty-mile trail to a keyhole pass into lake country that drains into the Yukon River headwaters. The image of prospectors struggling up the “Golden Staircase” to Chilkoot Pass engraved the Klondike gold rush of ‘98 onto the license plates of cultural memory. For centuries, Chilkats and Chilkoots sustained a trading cartel connected by their respective routes. From tide’s edge to the banks of the Yukon River four hundred miles north, Tlingits insisted on customer allegiance. They discouraged Interior trading partners from commerce with anyone but themselves and expressly prohibited economic activity without invitation. The 1852 siege of Fort Selkirk and subsequent expulsion of Hudson’s Bay Company demonstrated the market realities of the Chilkat/Chilkoot cartel.
    [Show full text]
  • Juneau Lynn Canal the Fjordland
    A spectacular day cruise package through the legendary waters of Lynn Canal! World-Class Tour Boat • Spectacular Scenery Superior Wildlife Viewing and Whale Watching Lynn Canal Juneau Depart Skagway and Haines in the morning and head south Upon arrival in Juneau, board our through Lynn Canal, our motorcoach for a tour of Juneau’s continent’s longest and highlights. See Alaska’s state capitol deepest glacial fjord. building, the governor’s mansion Traveled through the and downtown Juneau. Spend your centuries by trappers afternoon having lunch, shopping and exploring. We provide and traders, gold rush you with a walking tour map to orient you to Juneau’s stampeders, and modern downtown attractions such as Mt. Roberts Tram, Red Dog day adventurers, these Saloon, Alaska State Museum, Juneau-Douglas Museum, waters are rich in both Walter Soboleff Art and Cultural Center human and and St. Nicholas Cathedral. natural history. Sailing in the shadow of Our bus meets the Coast Range, view hanging glaciers you downtown for and historic Eldred Rock lighthouse. a trip to famed Mendenhall Wildlife abounds here; watch bald Glacier before returning to the eagles, harbor seals, porpoise, orcas boat. Savor a hearty bowl of and humpback whales. Stop at a rookery smoked salmon chowder while you where Steller sea lions gather in the summer months to sail north, en route to Skagway and Haines. breed and pup. FJORD EXPRESS TO JUNEAU FROM SKAGWAY OR HAINES DAY CRUISE PACKAGE The Fjordland Adult ................................$169 2017 SCHEDULE A 65-foot, state-of-the-art, fast-hulled catamaran, the MV Child (ages 2-12) .............$139 May 14 – Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Prioritization of Prince of Wales Island
    CONSERVATION PRIORITIZATION OF PRINCE OF WALES ISLAND Identifying opportunities for private land conservation Prepared by the Southeast Alaska Land Trust With support from U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Alaska Coastal Conservation Program February 2013 Conservation prioritization of Prince of Wales Island Conservation prioritization of Prince of Wales Island IDENTIFYING OPPORTUNITIES FOR PRIVATE LAND CONSERVATION INTRODUCTION The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) awarded the Southeast Alaska Land Trust (SEAL Trust) a Coastal Grant in 2012. SEAL Trust requested this grant to fund a conservation priority analysis of private property on Prince of Wales Island. This report and an associated Geographic Information Systems (GIS) map are the products of that work. Driving SEAL Trust’s interest in conservation opportunities on Prince of Wales Island is its obligations as an in-lieu fee sponsor for Southeast Alaska, which makes it eligible to receive fees in-lieu of mitigation for wetland impacts. Under its instrument with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers1, SEAL Trust must give priority to project sites within the same 8-digit Hydrologic Unit (HUC) as the permitted impacts. In the past 10 years, SEAL Trust has received a number of in-lieu fees from wetlands impacted by development on Prince of Wales Island, which, along with its outer islands, is the 8-digit HUC #19010103 (see Map 1). SEAL Trust has no conservation holdings or potential projects on Prince of Wales Island. In an attempt to achieve its conservation goals and compliance with the geographic elements of the Instrument, SEAL Trust wanted to take a strategic approach to exploring preservation possibilities in the Prince of Wales HUC.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Southeast Alaska Pink Salmon Tagging Investigations, 1981. Southeast Alaska Stock Separation Research Project, Annual R
    SOUTHERN SOUTHEAST ALASKA PINK SALMON INVESTIGATIONS, 1981. Southeast Alaska Stock Separation Research Project Annual Report – 1982 By Steve H. Hoffman Regional Information Report1 1J92-20 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Commercial Fisheries Juneau, Alaska December 1992 1 The Regional Information Report Series was established in 1987 to provide an information access system for all unpublished divisional reports. These reports frequently serve diverse ad hoc informational purposes or archive basic uninterpreted data. To accommodate timely reporting of recently collected information, reports in this series undergo only limited internal review and may contain preliminary data; this information may be subsequently finalized and published in the formal literature. Consequently, these reports should not be cited without prior approval of the author or the Division of Commercial Fisheries. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ............................. LISTOFFIGURES ........................... LISTOFAPPENDICES ......................... ABSTRACT .............................. INTRODUCTION ............................ OBJECTIVES ............................. PREVIOUS TAGGING STUDIES ...................... METHODS ............................... TagsEmployed ........................ Tagging Operations ...................... TagRecovery ......................... DataAnalysis ......................... RESULTS ............................... Tagging ............................ Spawning Ground Tag Recovery ................. Commercial
    [Show full text]
  • UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The Yanks are Coming Over There: The Role of Anglo-Saxonism and American Involvement in the First World War Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5cc4h9md Author Buenviaje, Dino Ejercito Publication Date 2014 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE The Yanks are Coming Over There: The Role of Anglo-Saxonism and American Involvement in the First World War A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History by Dino Ejercito Buenviaje August 2014 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Brian Lloyd, Chairperson Dr. Roger Ransom Dr. Thomas Cogswell Copyright by Dino Ejercito Buenviaje 2014 The Dissertation of Dino Ejercito Buenviaje is approved: Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside ACKNOWLEDGMENTS It is truly a humbling experience when I consider the people and institutions that have contributed to this work. First of all, I would like to thank my committee chair, Dr. Brian Lloyd, for his patience and mentorship in helping me to analyze the role of Anglo- Saxonism throughout American history and for making me keep sight of my purpose. I am also grateful to my other committee members such as Dr. Roger Ransom, for his support early in my graduate program, and Dr. Thomas Cogswell, for his support at a crucial point in my doctorate program. I also would like to thank Dr. Kenneth Barkin for his suggestion that I add a German-American chapter to my dissertation to make my study of American society during the First World War more well-rounded.
    [Show full text]
  • Abdallahi Ibn Muhammad, 139 Abdelhafid, Sultan of Morocco, 416
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-48382-7 — Learning Empire Erik Grimmer-Solem Index More Information INDEX Abdallahi ibn Muhammad, 139 extension services, 395 Abdelhafid, sultan of Morocco, 416 horticulture, 47 Abdul Hamid II, sultan of the Ottoman Landflucht, 43 Empire, 299 livestock, 43, 55, 72, 229, 523, 564 Abyssinia, 547 maize, 155, 229 acclimatization question. See tropics milling, 70, 240 Achenbach, Heinrich, 80–81 oil seeds, 55 Adams, Henry, 32, 316 peasants, 55–56, 184, 272–73, 275, Adana, 363, 365 427, 429, 433, 559–60 Addams, Jane, 70 reforms of, 429 Addis Ababa, 547 rice, 88, 105, 529 Aden, 87, 139, 245, 546 rubber, 408–9, 412, 414, 416, 421, Adenauer, Konrad, 602 426, 445 Adrianople, 486, 491 rye, 55, 273, 279, 522, 525 Afghanistan, 120, 176, 324 sugar, 55, 78, 155, 204, 380, 385, Africa, German 411–12, 416, 423, 445 See also Cameroon, East Africa; tea, 412 Herero and Nama wars; Maji tobacco, 76, 152, 204, 379–80, Maji rebellion; Southwest 412–14, 416, 423, 445 Africa; Togo wheat, 43, 46–47, 49–50, 53, 55, 59, Agadir Crisis (1911), 376, 406, 416–17, 69, 71, 229, 520, 522, 525, 528, 437, 456–57, 479, 486, 500 561, 579 Agrarian League (Bund der Landwirte), See also colonial science; cotton 469, 471, 473, 477 industry; inner colonization; agriculture rubber industry; sugar industry; barley, 47, 55, 523 tobacco industry cacao, 152, 155 Ahmad bin Abd Allah, Muhammad, 139 coconuts, 218 Alabama, 378 coffee, 145, 152, 155, 204, 273, 412 See also Calhoun Colored School; copra, 218 Tuskegee Institute cotton, 67, 74–75, 151, 158, 204,
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the United States Fish Commission Seattlenwf V.45
    SALMON-TAGGING EXPERIMENTS IN ALASKA, 1927 AND 1928 1 ~ By WILLIS H. RICH, Ph. D., In charge, Pacific Coast Fishery Investigations FREDERICK G. MORTON, Warden, :Alaska Fisheries Service U. S. Bureau of Fisheries ~ CONTENTS Page l'age Introduction _ 1 Southeastern Alaska, 1927-Continued. Southeastern Alaska, 1927 _ 2 Cape Decision _ 15 Icy StraiL _ 4 Clarence Strait- _ 17 Chatham Strait- _ 7 Conclusions _ 18 Frederick Sound _ 10 Uganik Bay, 1927 _ 18 Stephens Passage _ 13 Nicholaski Spit, 1928 _ 21 Sumner Strait _ 13 INTRODUCTION The series of salmon-tagging experiments in Alaska, which was begun in 1922, was continued during the two years covered by this report. In 1927 a number of ex­ periments were conducted in southeastern Alaska and one in Uganik Bay, Kodiak Island. In 1928 an experiment was carried out at Nicholaski Spit on the Alaska Peninsula. The experiments in southeastern Alaska were designed to fill in some of the gaps in the information that had been secured from previous experiments in thig district. The other experiments were designed to settle specific questions that had arisen in connection with the administration of the fisheries. .\lthough many details of the salmon migrations yet remain to be discovered, it is our opinion that the general features are now well enough known so that there is little need to continue general tagging experiments of the nature of those performed in southeastern Alaska in 1924 to 1927. It is planned, therefore, to use the method of tagging in the future only in connection with specific problems, such as those at Uganik Bay and Nicholaski Spit, which are covered by this report.
    [Show full text]