Facing up to Evil: a Conversation Ruth Wisse and Seth Lipsky Are Among the Most Influential, Thoughtful Jews Associ- Ated with Neoconservatism

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Facing up to Evil: a Conversation Ruth Wisse and Seth Lipsky Are Among the Most Influential, Thoughtful Jews Associ- Ated with Neoconservatism Facing Up to Evil: A Conversation Ruth Wisse and Seth Lipsky are among the most influential, thoughtful Jews associ- ated with neoconservatism. Wisse is the Martin Peretz Professor of Yiddish Literature and professor of comparative literature at Harvard University and recently won the Na- tional Humanities Medal. She is the author of many books, most recently Jews and Power (Nextbook). Lipsky, founding editor of the Forward, is currently the editor of the New York Sun. Sh’ma asked to sit in on a frank, open exchange between Lipsky and Wisse on Jews, conservatism, and the future. Ruth Wisse: I’m always amused when conversation with family friends and discov- people carp about neoconservatives because ered they were extraordinarily hawkish about there is so little in the carping that I tend to Vietnam. And as a naïve, vaguely centrist un- recognize. Some movements declare them- dergraduate at Harvard, I kept asking them, selves, like Communism, Fascism, or Zionism, why? They answered that we’re next in line for but others are labeled by adversaries and then attack and if you flinch in Vietnam, they’re the affronted party decides to wear the title as coming after us. That conversation helped a badge of honor. turn my views. Those who attacked neoconservatives ob- Wisse: Everyone I know who would de- viously felt that there was nothing worse than fine themselves as neoconservative became so being called conservatives, but Irving Kristol, simply because of changing their minds. So, and then Norman Podhoretz, decided that you might almost call it a group of people who there might be an advantage in this designa- changed their minds in the same direction. tion. Since every neocon I know is a maverick, My turning or my recognizing this started a lit- I wanted to know how you would characterize tle earlier than the 1960s. a neoconservative? And how do you feel about In fact, it was a book, Lionel Trilling’s the term when it’s applied to you? novel Middle of the Journey, that I would suggest Seth Lipsky: I feel fine about the term is the original text of neoconservatism. It de- when it’s applied to me. I endorsed Bill Clin- scribes exactly what you were saying about ton twice when I was at the Forward. Amity your trip to Israel. It tells the story of an intel- Shlaes, my wife, voted for George H. W. Bush lectual, John Laskell, who at the beginning of in 1992 and Bob Dole in 1996. She was on the the book is recovering from an illness, and editorial board of the Wall Street Journal, and I this illness changes him because he recognizes voted for Clinton both times when I was editor within it the real presence of death. He then of the Forward. I explained that decision by meets a character based on the figure of Whit- saying that she and I got together and decided taker Chambers who had just broken with to put our newspapers ahead of our country. I Communism who is afraid he is going to be didn’t come up through the intellectual wars. killed for his defection. When Laskell goes to I often think of neoconservatism as a move- meet friends of his who are archetypal pro- ment that one entered through the Jewish gressives, he is terribly disappointed in them struggle; that’s probably how I entered it. Cer- on both counts. The progressives don’t want tainly a lot of this started in Commentary. to talk about death; they think death is reac- Wisse: Being Jewish had a lot to do with it tionary. Neither do they want to give up their for the neocons I know. Many started out on the dream of the Soviet Union. No matter how left. Though they rarely talked about European much they find out about it, they still want to Jewry or the rise of the State of Israel, what hap- carry on as if it were the greatest place on pened in the 1940s influenced them deeply as earth. This confrontation with them (and with Jews. One of the ways it came out was in their his former self) turns him “neoconservative” turning away from an earlier indifference. They by the end of the book. realized how wrong they had been in their di- One could say that progressive attitudes agnosis of domestic and foreign issues. toward Israel went in the opposite direction. Lipsky: I made my first trip to Israel in Jews of the Left assumed the country would be April 2008 1967 as an undergraduate, accredited to the an ideal socialist or communist entity and be- Nisan 5768 Berkshire Eagle and with an assignment from came disillusioned at its deviation from Marx- To subscribe: 877-568-SHMA the Jewish Advocate in Boston. There, I had a ist orthodoxy as they defined it. When Arab www.shma.com 7 nations attacked, they held the Jews of Pales- you always have movements like Christianity tine responsible for the aggression against in its time or socialism in its time that say, let’s them. The neocons came to understand that get beyond the Jewish condition. Let’s univer- the first task of liberal democracy, imperfect salize the Jewish condition. Let’s think of as it might be, was to defend its existence. This bringing this to a higher level without the spe- was as true of America as it was of the Jews of cific laws and restrictions. And if that goes too Palestine. Do you think, then, that neocon- far, then it becomes an anti-Judaism. servatism is kind of a defensive movement? Irving Kristol in 1949 wrote in Commen- Lipsky: We’re certainly under attack, tary, “Judaism today, and especially liberal and I do think there is a war against the Jews Judaism, despite the horrors of modern total- being levied by the same people who are levy- itarianism, seems unable to recognize sin ing war against America. So, in that sense, it’s when it sees it. It does see the evil of individual similar to the Cold War. wickedly-minded men (or nations) but it re- Though there is a war being levied against fuses to assign evil its full and menacing us, there’s also a proactive element to conser- stature. It has preferred to dress itself up in vatives — the creating of conditions for peo- the clothes of 19th-century liberalism in order ple to be free, Americans to be free, Jews to be to attend a 20th-century execution. The tran- free, other people, as George Bush often says. scendental hope of Judaism has settled into Wisse: I’m talking about the defense of uncomprehending, complacent euphoria.” freedom and you’re talking about the obtain- I believe Kristol is saying that Judaism was ment of freedom. Maybe neoconservatism supposed to be hardheaded enough to deal means putting a premium on freedom and with evil. That was really its greatest accom- taking it seriously — truly obtaining political plishment — to delimit evil and to be able to liberty for all. keep evil in check. So how could the Jews be the This may be why it’s so hard to define pre- ones, when so much evil is directed at them, to cisely. Freedom is both liberal and conservative. get caught up, to dress themselves up in the We have the story of the Jews breaking out of clothes of 19th-century liberalism in order to at- tend a 20th-century execution when that exe- Given the laws of Leviticus, the laws of kashrut, cution was their own? Neoconservatives are the the boundaries of the Sabbath, the commands of ones who faced up to the evil and refused to at- tend the liberal masquerade in costume. Per- humility before God, can anyone really think haps that’s what defines neoconservatism and that Judaism itself is not conservative? proves its great virtue, especially for Jews. Lipsky: I don’t know that I have felt a Egypt and trying to be free. On one hand the great deal of disappointment in liberal Jews. I Bible records an amazing rush to freedom but, just don’t agree with them in politics. You on the other hand, this rabble is no sooner free know, there are some streaks of liberalism that than you see what animals they are, you see I admire a great deal still, although it’s more how incapable they are of living in any civilized a European-style liberalism. way until they receive the code of behavior, the Wisse: Liberalism that created the mod- Ten Commandments, a very stringent code of ern liberal state. But what about people who law. Given the laws of Leviticus, the laws of are unwilling to take into account the politi- kashrut, the boundaries of the Sabbath, the cal context within which liberal democracies commands of humility before God, can anyone are trying to flourish? In relation to Israel, really think that Judaism itself is not conserva- many liberals have an idealized version of be- tive — that it doesn’t have a deeply conserva- havior that does not take into account the tive view of the human condition? context within which it functions. Lipsky: The question of whether Ju- Lipsky: One of the formative passages in daism is mainly conservative is widely dis- my own career was editing the Forward. I used puted, though. I take your point completely. to make habit of going back to read what the Wisse: Perhaps everybody has a liberal Forward, a tribune of progressive pro-labor or and a conservative tendency; if things go too socialist worldview, said about things, and I April 2008 far in one direction then you see movement was always startled at how conservative it was in Nisan 5768 To subscribe: 877-568-SHMA in the other.
Recommended publications
  • Download Full Journal (PDF)
    SAPIR A JOURNAL OF JEWISH CONVERSATIONS THE ISSUE ON POWER ELISA SPUNGEN BILDNER & ROBERT BILDNER RUTH CALDERON · MONA CHAREN MARK DUBOWITZ · DORE GOLD FELICIA HERMAN · BENNY MORRIS MICHAEL OREN · ANSHEL PFEFFER THANE ROSENBAUM · JONATHAN D. SARNA MEIR SOLOVEICHIK · BRET STEPHENS JEFF SWARTZ · RUTH R. WISSE Volume Two Summer 2021 And they saw the God of Israel: Under His feet there was the likeness of a pavement of sapphire, like the very sky for purity. — Exodus 24: 10 SAPIR Bret Stephens EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Mark Charendoff PUBLISHER Ariella Saperstein ASSO CIATE PUBLISHER Felicia Herman MANAGING EDITOR Katherine Messenger DESIGNER & ILLUSTRATOR Sapir, a Journal of Jewish Conversations. ISSN 2767-1712. 2021, Volume 2. Published by Maimonides Fund. Copyright ©2021 by Maimonides Fund. No part of this journal may be reproduced in any form or by any means without the prior written consent of Maimonides Fund. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. WWW.SAPIRJOURNAL.ORG WWW.MAIMONIDESFUND.ORG CONTENTS 6 Publisher’s Note | Mark Charendoff 90 MICHAEL OREN Trial and Triage in Washington 8 BRET STEPHENS The Necessity of Jewish Power 98 MONA CHAREN Between Hostile and Crazy: Jews and the Two Parties Power in Jewish Text & History 106 MARK DUBOWITZ How to Use Antisemitism Against Antisemites 20 RUTH R. WISSE The Allure of Powerlessness Power in Culture & Philanthropy 34 RUTH CALDERON King David and the Messiness of Power 116 JEFF SWARTZ Philanthropy Is Not Enough 46 RABBI MEIR Y. SOLOVEICHIK The Power of the Mob in an Unforgiving Age 124 ELISA SPUNGEN BILDNER & ROBERT BILDNER Power and Ethics in Jewish Philanthropy 56 ANSHEL PFEFFER The Use and Abuse of Jewish Power 134 JONATHAN D.
    [Show full text]
  • On Robert Alter's Bible
    Barbara S. Burstin Pittsburgh's Jews and the Tree of Life JEWISH REVIEW OF BOOKS Volume 9, Number 4 Winter 2019 $10.45 On Robert Alter’s Bible Adele Berlin David Bentley Hart Shai Held Ronald Hendel Adam Kirsch Aviya Kushner Editor Abraham Socher BRANDEIS Senior Contributing Editor Allan Arkush UNIVERSITY PRESS Art Director Spinoza’s Challenge to Jewish Thought Betsy Klarfeld Writings on His Life, Philosophy, and Legacy Managing Editor Edited by Daniel B. Schwartz Amy Newman Smith “This collection of Jewish views on, and responses to, Spinoza over Web Editor the centuries is an extremely useful addition to the literature. That Rachel Scheinerman it has been edited by an expert on Spinoza’s legacy in the Jewish Editorial Assistant world only adds to its value.” Kate Elinsky Steven Nadler, University of Wisconsin March 2019 Editorial Board Robert Alter Shlomo Avineri Leora Batnitzky Ruth Gavison Moshe Halbertal Hillel Halkin Jon D. Levenson Anita Shapira Michael Walzer J. H.H. Weiler Ruth R. Wisse Steven J. Zipperstein Executive Director Eric Cohen Publisher Gil Press Chairman’s Council Blavatnik Family Foundation Publication Committee The Donigers of Not Bad for The Soul of the Stranger Marilyn and Michael Fedak Great Neck Delancey Street Reading God and Torah from A Mythologized Memoir The Rise of Billy Rose a Transgender Perspective Ahuva and Martin J. Gross Wendy Doniger Mark Cohen Joy Ladin Susan and Roger Hertog Roy J. Katzovicz “Walking through the snow to see “Comprehensive biography . “This heartfelt, difficult work will Wendy at the stately, gracious compelling story. Highly introduce Jews and other readers The Lauder Foundation– home of Rita and Lester Doniger recommended.” of the Torah to fresh, sensitive Leonard and Judy Lauder will forever remain in my memory.” Library Journal (starred review) approaches with room for broader Sandra Earl Mintz Francis Ford Coppola human dignity.” Tina and Steven Price Charitable Foundation Publishers Weekly (starred review) March 2019 Pamela and George Rohr Daniel Senor The Lost Library Jewish Legal Paul E.
    [Show full text]
  • History 600: Public Intellectuals in the US Prof. Ratner-Rosenhagen Office
    Hannah Arendt W.E.B. DuBois Noam Chomsky History 600: Public Intellectuals in the U.S. Prof. Ratner-Rosenhagen Lecturer: Ronit Stahl Class Meetings: Office: Mosse Hum. 4112 Office: Mosse Hum. 4112 M 11 a.m.-1 p.m. email: [email protected] email: [email protected] Room: Mosse Hum. 5257 Prof. RR’s Office Hours: R.S.’s Office Hours: T 3- M 9 a.m.-11a.m. 5 p.m. This course is designed for students interested in exploring the life of the mind in the twentieth-century United States. Specifically, we will examine the life of particular minds— intellectuals of different political, moral, and social persuasions and sensibilities, who have played prominent roles in American public life over the course of the last century. Despite the common conception of American culture as profoundly anti-intellectual, we will evaluate how professional thinkers and writers have indeed been forces in American society. Our aim is to investigate the contested meaning, role, and place of the intellectual in a democratic, capitalist culture. We will also examine the cultural conditions, academic and governmental institutions, and the media for the dissemination of ideas, which have both fostered and inhibited intellectual production and exchange. Roughly the first third of the semester will be devoted to reading studies in U.S. and comparative intellectual history, the sociology of knowledge, and critical social theory. In addition, students will explore the varieties of public intellectual life by becoming familiarized with a wide array of prominent American philosophers, political and social theorists, scientists, novelists, artists, and activists.
    [Show full text]
  • When Victims Rule
    1 24 JEWISH INFLUENCE IN THE MASS MEDIA, Part II In 1985 Laurence Tisch, Chairman of the Board of New York University, former President of the Greater New York United Jewish Appeal, an active supporter of Israel, and a man of many other roles, started buying stock in the CBStelevision network through his company, the Loews Corporation. The Tisch family, worth an estimated 4 billion dollars, has major interests in hotels, an insurance company, Bulova, movie theatres, and Loliards, the nation's fourth largest tobacco company (Kent, Newport, True cigarettes). Brother Andrew Tisch has served as a Vice-President for the UJA-Federation, and as a member of the United Jewish Appeal national youth leadership cabinet, the American Jewish Committee, and the American Israel Political Action Committee, among other Jewish organizations. By September of 1986 Tisch's company owned 25% of the stock of CBS and he became the company's president. And Tisch -- now the most powerful man at CBS -- had strong feelings about television, Jews, and Israel. The CBS news department began to live in fear of being compromised by their boss -- overtly, or, more likely, by intimidation towards self-censorship -- concerning these issues. "There have been rumors in New York for years," says J. J. Goldberg, "that Tisch took over CBS in 1986 at least partly out of a desire to do something about media bias against Israel." [GOLDBERG, p. 297] The powerful President of a major American television network dare not publicize his own active bias in favor of another country, of course. That would look bad, going against the grain of the democratic traditions, free speech, and a presumed "fair" mass media.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Lionel Trilling Jefferson Lecturer the Blakelock Problem
    Humanities New York City, a sheaf of rolled-up canvases under his arm, while Blakelock bargained; as often as not, they’d return to the same dealers with the same pic­ tures just before closing, Blakelock desperate and willing to accept almost anything for his work. He was a self-taught artist, born and raised in New York City, who headed west after graduation from what is now the City University of New York, sketch­ ing his way across the plains to the coast, returning by way of Mexico, Panama, and the West Indies. At first he painted pictures in the Hudson River style— romantically colored panoramas identifiable with the locales he had visited. But as the years passed, the children came, and fame, fortune or even a minimal income eluded him, Blakelock started building on canvas a world of his own: dark scenes, heavy with overarching trees Dr. Lionel Trilling brooding over moonlit waters, highly romantic Indian Jefferson Lecturer encampments that never were. Bright colors left his palette, the hues of night dominated. Dr. Lionel Trilling will deliver the first Jefferson Lec­ Blakelock did build up a modest following of col­ ture in the Humanities before a distinguished au­ lectors, but in the 1870’s and 1880’s, $30 to $50 was dience at the National Academy of Sciences Audi­ a decent price for a sizable painting by an unknown, torium, 2101 Constitution Avenue Northwest, Wash­ and his fees never caught up with his expenses. Only ington, D. C. on Wednesday, April 26 at eight once did light break through: in 1883, the Toledo o ’clock.
    [Show full text]
  • The Deadly Price of Pursuing Peace by Evelyn Gordon
    JANUARY 2010 ggggggggg The Deadly Price of Pursuing Peace by evelyn gordon WHEN the Oslo process began in 1993, one benefi t its adherents promised was a signifi cant improvement in Israel’s international standing. Now, 16 years later, Israel’s has fallen to an unprecedented low. Yet even today, conventional wisdom, including OBAMA’S NEXT THREE YEARS in Israel, continues to assert that Israel’s JOHN R. BOLTON #3 Commentary international standing depends on its A NEVER-ENDING willingness to advance the “peace pro- ECONOMIC CRISIS? DAVID M. SMICK cess.” So why has Israel’s standing fallen #3 WHY JEWS JANUARY 2010 : VOLUME 129 NUMBER 1 : VOLUME 2010 JANUARY so precipitously despite its numerous HATE PALIN JENNIFER RUBIN concessions for peace since 1993? The #3 PHILIP ROTH mounting evidence makes it inescapable: COMES TO THE END Israel’s standing has declined so precipi- SAM SACKS tously not despite Oslo but because of Oslo. $5.95 US : $7.00 CANADA $7.00 : US $5.95 JCC Maccabi Games 2009 Taube Koret Campus for Jewish Life KORET FOUNDATION AND TAUBE PHILANTHROPIES Collaborating to support Jewish life in the San Francisco Bay Area: Bay Area Jewish Community Centers Contemporary Jewish Museum, San Francisco Hillel at Stanford JCC Maccabi Games 2009 Jewish Chaplaincy at Stanford University Medical Center Jewish Family & Children’s Services of San Francisco Jewish Home of San Francisco Koret-Taube Initiative on Jewish Peoplehood Taube Center for Jewish Studies at Stanford Taube Koret Campus for Jewish Life, Palo Alto Koret-Taube Grand Lobby, www.koretfoundation.org
    [Show full text]
  • Lionel Trilling's Existential State
    Lionel Trilling’s Existential State Michael Szalay Death is like justice is supposed to be. Ralph Ellison, Three Days Before the Shooting IN 1952, LIONEL TRILLING ANNOUNCED THAT “intellect has associated itself with power, per- haps as never before in history, and is now conceded to be in itself a kind of power.” He was de- scribing what would be his own associations: his personal papers are littered with missives from the stars of postwar politics. Senator James L. Buckley admires his contribution to American let- ters. Jacob J. Javits does the same. Daniel Patrick Moynihan praises him as “the nation’s leading literary critic.” First Lady Jacqueline Kennedy writes from the White House, thanking him for the collection of D. H. Lawrence stories and hoping to see him again soon. Three years later, President Lyndon Johnson sends a telegram asking Trilling to represent him at the funeral of T. S. Eliot. Politicians liked having Trilling around. He confirmed their noble sense of mission as often as they praised him.1 Trilling’s accommodating relation to power alienated many of his peers, like Irving Howe and C. Wright Mills, and later provoked condemnations from historians like Christopher Lasch and MICHAEL SZALAY teaches American literature and culture at UC, Irvine, and is the author of New Deal Modernism and The Hip Figure, forthcoming from Stanford University Press. He is co-editor of Stanford’s “Post*45” Book Series. 1 Trilling thought that the political establishment embraced intellectuals because it was “uneasy with itself” and eager “to apologize for its existence by a show of taste and sensitivity.” Trilling, “The Situation of the American Intellectual at the Present Time,” in The Moral Obligation to Be Intelligent, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Jews with Money: Yuval Levin on Capitalism Richard I
    JEWISH REVIEW Number 2, Summer 2010 $6.95 OF BOOKS Ruth R. Wisse The Poet from Vilna Jews with Money: Yuval Levin on Capitalism Richard I. Cohen on Camondo Treasure David Sorkin on Steven J. Moses Zipperstein Montefiore The Spy who Came from the Shtetl Anita Shapira The Kibbutz and the State Robert Alter Yehuda Halevi Moshe Halbertal How Not to Pray Walter Russell Mead Christian Zionism Plus Summer Fiction, Crusaders Vanquished & More A Short History of the Jews Michael Brenner Editor Translated by Jeremiah Riemer Abraham Socher “Drawing on the best recent scholarship and wearing his formidable learning lightly, Michael Publisher Brenner has produced a remarkable synoptic survey of Jewish history. His book must be considered a standard against which all such efforts to master and make sense of the Jewish Eric Cohen past should be measured.” —Stephen J. Whitfield, Brandeis University Sr. Contributing Editor Cloth $29.95 978-0-691-14351-4 July Allan Arkush Editorial Board Robert Alter The Rebbe Shlomo Avineri The Life and Afterlife of Menachem Mendel Schneerson Leora Batnitzky Samuel Heilman & Menachem Friedman Ruth Gavison “Brilliant, well-researched, and sure to be controversial, The Rebbe is the most important Moshe Halbertal biography of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson ever to appear. Samuel Heilman and Hillel Halkin Menachem Friedman, two of the world’s foremost sociologists of religion, have produced a Jon D. Levenson landmark study of Chabad, religious messianism, and one of the greatest spiritual figures of the twentieth century.” Anita Shapira —Jonathan D. Sarna, author of American Judaism: A History Michael Walzer Cloth $29.95 978-0-691-13888-6 J.
    [Show full text]
  • Power and Powerlessness in Jewish History, Politics & Government JUDS 0980S – Spring Semester – 2009 Research Seminar, Thurs
    Zionism, Anti-Zionism & Post-Zionism 1 Brown University Program in Judaic Studies Power and Powerlessness in Jewish History, Politics & Government JUDS 0980S – Spring Semester – 2009 Research Seminar, Thurs. 4:00-6:20 Instructor: Prof. Sam Lehman-Wilzig Office: 163 George St., Room 301 (Program in Judaic Studies – 3rd floor) Office Hours: Tuesday, 10:30-11:30 AM; Thursday 3:00-3:45 PM; or by appointment (through e-mail) Phone: 863-7564 or 863-3912 E-mail: [email protected] Personal Website: www.profslw.com OCRA Code: JewPower Seminar Description & Goals The purposes of this seminar are twofold: 1- to survey and analyze the central concepts, principles, values and institutions within the Jewish tradition and Jewish history – from Biblical times to the contemporary period – that are related to the question of "power/lessness", including political, social, and economic power; 2- to have each student develop analytical tools to carry out research on one specific "power/lessness" topic (thematic research), or how power in all its manifestations was viewed and (where relevant) also used within a particular historical period/place (contextual research). The central questions that this seminar will address: What does Jewish history, as well as the normative religio-legal tradition, have to say about power relationships within the Jewish polity – between "branches" of government, as well as between governor/s and governed? What about power relationships vis-à-vis sovereign Gentile rulers when no Jewish State exists? Is the Jewish approach to the question of political power consistent over time or mutable depending on circumstances? What is the place of opposition to authority in the Jewish heritage? What types of war (and military practices) are legitimate and which aren't? What other types of "Jewish Power" have been in evidence over the past centuries in Jewish history, and how do they relate to political power? Are power relationships in the State of Israel today consonant with, or contradictory to, the Jewish heritage? The course has no formal prerequisite.
    [Show full text]
  • Neoconservatism Hoover Press : Berkowitz/Conservative Hberkc Ch5 Mp 104 Rev1 Page 104 Hoover Press : Berkowitz/Conservative Hberkc Ch5 Mp 105 Rev1 Page 105
    Hoover Press : Berkowitz/Conservative hberkc ch5 Mp_103 rev1 page 103 part iii Neoconservatism Hoover Press : Berkowitz/Conservative hberkc ch5 Mp_104 rev1 page 104 Hoover Press : Berkowitz/Conservative hberkc ch5 Mp_105 rev1 page 105 chapter five The Neoconservative Journey Jacob Heilbrunn The Neoconservative Conspiracy The longer the United States struggles to impose order in postwar Iraq, the harsher indictments of the George W. Bush administration’s foreign policy are becoming. “Acquiring additional burdens by engag- ing in new wars of liberation is the last thing the United States needs,” declared one Bush critic in Foreign Affairs. “The principal problem is the mistaken belief that democracy is a talisman for all the world’s ills, and that the United States has a responsibility to promote dem- ocratic government wherever in the world it is lacking.”1 Does this sound like a Democratic pundit bashing Bush for par- tisan gain? Quite the contrary. The swipe came from Dimitri Simes, president of the Nixon Center and copublisher of National Interest. Simes is not alone in calling on the administration to reclaim the party’s pre-Reagan heritage—to abandon the moralistic, Wilsonian, neoconservative dream of exporting democracy and return to a more limited and realistic foreign policy that avoids the pitfalls of Iraq. 1. Dimitri K. Simes, “America’s Imperial Dilemma,” Foreign Affairs (Novem- ber/December 2003): 97, 100. Hoover Press : Berkowitz/Conservative hberkc ch5 Mp_106 rev1 page 106 106 jacob heilbrunn In fact, critics on the Left and Right are remarkably united in their assessment of the administration. Both believe a neoconservative cabal has hijacked the administration’s foreign policy and has now overplayed its hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Norman Podhoretz: a Biography"
    Books Book Review: "Norman Podhoretz: A Biography" By Thomas L. Jeffers (Cambridge University Press). By Saul Rosenberg '93GSAS | Fall 2010 Norman Podhoretz, a maker of friends, ex-friends, and enemies. (David Howells / Corbis) John Gross, the English literary critic, was once in a magazine office in New York when the secretary called across the room to him: “John, there’s a Mr. Podhoretz on the phone for you.” As Gross recalled, “I felt every pair of eyes drilling into me, as though she’d said, ‘There’s a Mr. Himmler on the phone for you.’” This anecdote, retold by Thomas Jeffers in his Norman Podhoretz: A Biography, nicely sums up what many people feel about “Mr. Podhoretz.” He is hated by liberals for his turn to the right at the end of the sixties, and particularly loathed for his energetic support of Ronald Reagan, George W. Bush, and the Iraq War. So it is good someone should remind us, as Jeffers admiringly does, that Podhoretz is a first- class intellectual of enormous culture and considerable humanity. Podhoretz ’50CC was a first-generation American prodigy, an acute reader initially of literature and then politics, whose aggressive intellect took him from beat-up Brownsville through a glittering student career at Columbia College and Cambridge University to the editorship of Commentary at age 30. He edited the monthly from 1960 to 1995 into a publication The Economist once mused might be “the best magazine in the world.” In the last 25 years of his tenure, Podhoretz helped found and lead the neoconservative revolution that insisted, against some popular and much elite opinion, that America was, for all its faults, a clear force for good in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Sholem Schwarzbard: Biography of a Jewish Assassin
    Sholem Schwarzbard: Biography of a Jewish Assassin The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Johnson, Kelly. 2012. Sholem Schwarzbard: Biography of a Jewish Assassin. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:9830349 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA © 2012 Kelly Scott Johnson All rights reserved Professor Ruth R. Wisse Kelly Scott Johnson Sholem Schwarzbard: Biography of a Jewish Assassin Abstract The thesis represents the first complete academic biography of a Jewish clockmaker, warrior poet and Anarchist named Sholem Schwarzbard. Schwarzbard's experience was both typical and unique for a Jewish man of his era. It included four immigrations, two revolutions, numerous pogroms, a world war and, far less commonly, an assassination. The latter gained him fleeting international fame in 1926, when he killed the Ukrainian nationalist leader Symon Petliura in Paris in retribution for pogroms perpetrated during the Russian Civil War (1917-20). After a contentious trial, a French jury was sufficiently convinced both of Schwarzbard's sincerity as an avenger, and of Petliura's responsibility for the actions of his armies, to acquit him on all counts. Mostly forgotten by the rest of the world, the assassin has remained a divisive figure in Jewish-Ukrainian relations, leading to distorted and reductive descriptions his life.
    [Show full text]