DOCSLIB.ORG

05 Section 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
05 Section 2 SECTION 2: COUNTY PROFILE 2 COUNTY PROFILE This section discusses the geography and environment, community facts, population and demographics, land use and development, and critical facilities in Bedford County (County). 2.1 GEOGRAPHY AND ENVIRONMENT Bedford County is a rural county located in in the south-central portion of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, encompassing just over 1,000 square miles. It shares its southern border with the state of Maryland and is bordered to the east by Fulton County, to the northeast by Huntingdon County, to the north by Blair County, to the northwest by Cambria County, and to the west by Somerset County. Bedford County’s landscape is largely composed of aged mountain ridges and small valleys. These valleys are fertile and productive enough to support the primarily rural lifestyle of the County’s residents. Approximately 67 percent of the County’s land area is categorized as forested/woodland, and roughly 23 percent is categorized under various agricultural uses (Bedford County Comprehensive Plan Update, 2006). Less than 8 percent of the County’s land area is classified as something other than agricultural or forest, and much of that area is composed of residential development in boroughs and along major roadways. The northern three-quarters of the County drain into the Susquehanna River Basin, while the southern quarter drains into the Potomac River Basin. Bedford County has an extensive transportation network, including five highways: U.S. Route 30 (also known as the Lincoln Highway), U.S. Route 220, and Interstates 70, 76, and 99, which provide east-west access to Pittsburgh and Philadelphia via I-76, the Pennsylvania Turnpike, with interchanges in both Bedford and Breezewood. Additionally, I-70 offers access to Washington/Baltimore and other points east, while I-99 provides access north to Altoona, State College, and I-80. Bedford County is strategically located within 100 miles of Pittsburgh and Harrisburg, and 140 miles from the Baltimore and Washington, D.C. metropolitan areas (excerpted from the Bedford County Comprehensive Plan Update, 2006). Figure 2-1 shows a base map of Bedford County. Bedford County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2-1 October 2017 SECTION 2: COUNTY PROFILE Figure 2-1. Bedford County Base Map Source: PASDA, Bedford County Bedford County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2-2 October 2017 SECTION 2: COUNTY PROFILE 2.2 COMMUNITY FACTS Bedford County was created on March 9, 1771 from part of Cumberland County. It consists of 38 municipalities: 25 townships and 13 boroughs. Bedford County’s seat is Bedford Borough, which has a population of 2,841. Bedford County’s economy and settlement patterns have historically been guided and supported by the rich natural resources in the region. Like many other American communities, settlement originally occurred along waterways, followed by rail lines and the interstate highway system in more recent history. The construction of the Pennsylvania Turnpike through the County in October 1940 marked a turning point in the County’s economy, ushering in a dramatic increase in commercial activity, particularly surrounding its interchanges at Breezewood and Bedford. Today, most Bedford County residents enjoy a predominantly rural landscape of forested hills and mountains and agricultural valleys, with most of the population residing in small towns and villages. 2.3 POPULATION AND DEMOGRAPHICS Population and demographic data provide baseline information about residents. Changes in demographics or population may be used to identify higher-risk populations. Maintaining up-to-date data on demographics will allow the County to better assess magnitudes of hazards and develop more specific mitigation plans. Baseline demographic information for Bedford County is provided in Table 2-1. Table 2-1. Demographics 2010 Census - Demographics 2010 Census Pennsylvania Total population 49,762 12,702,379 Male 24,705 6,190,363 Female 25,057 6,512,016 Median age (years) 43.9 40.4 Under 5 years 2,627 719,941 18 years and over 39,023 9,910,224 65 years and over 9,476 1,959,307 Total households 20,233 5,018,904 Group quarters population 551 429,126 Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2010, General Population and Housing Characteristics, Bedford County Bedford County has a smaller population than more than half of counties in the Commonwealth (49,762) and is ranked 57th of 67 counties)for its population density, with a density of only 49.2 people per square mile, as compared to 283.9 people per square mile in Pennsylvania as a whole (U.S. Census Bureau 2013). A low population density means that people are spread throughout the County rather than clustered in groups. Dispersing information, instructions, and resources to residents in low-density areas is more difficult than in more densely populated areas because individuals are not centralized. While low-density areas provide challenges to disseminating hazard mitigation information, a low population density also helps prevent hazards from affecting as many people. For example, diseases may not spread as quickly because citizens are in contact with less people. Similarly, fires are less likely to spread to other structures because of the large distances between them. The magnitude of an event is typically smaller in a less populated area because each event affects fewer people and properties. Bedford County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2-3 October 2017 SECTION 2: COUNTY PROFILE Figure 2-2. Bedford County 2010 Population Distribution Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2010 Bedford County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2-4 October 2017 SECTION 2: COUNTY PROFILE Approximately 19 percent of Bedford’s population is age 65 or older, compared with 15.4 percent across Pennsylvania. These residents may have special needs. For example, many residents in this age bracket may be unable to drive; therefore, special evacuation plans may need to be created for them. They may also have hearing or vision impairments that could make receiving emergency instructions difficult. Both older and younger populations have higher risks for contracting certain diseases. Bedford County’s combined under-5-years-of-age and over-65 populations represent approximately 24.3 percent of its population. Figure 2-3 illustrates population distribution for residents age 65 and older. Figure 2-3. Bedford County Population Over 65 Years Source: US Census 2010 Bedford County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2-5 October 2017 SECTION 2: COUNTY PROFILE Only 1.1 percent of Bedford’s population lives in group quarters, compared to 3.4 percent across Pennsylvania. The term group quarters refers to people living in communal settings, which can include inmates in a prison, students in a dorm, or elderly or mentally disabled individuals living in group care homes. Residents living in group quarters are often special needs populations. It is important to ensure that each group quarters facility has its own emergency plan to account for the unique needs of its residents during a hazard event. Table 2-2 below provides population estimates for each municipality in Bedford County and for the County as a whole. The population of the entire County is estimated to be 48,779 by the year 2040, which represents a net population decrease of just over 950 people in a 30-year period. While the County will experience an overall population loss, some individual municipalities are expecting to experience a slight increase in population. Population loss typically means that some structures may become vacant and infrastructure will age, as little new development (and subsequent infrastructure updates) will be necessary. It is important for Bedford County to properly maintain its existing infrastructure and develop plans to manage or redevelop vacant properties. Table 2-2. Population Estimates per Municipality in Bedford County 2000 2020 2030 2040 Municipality Name 2010 Census Census Projected Projected Projected Bedford B 3,141 2,841 2,715 2,470 2,294 Bedford T 5,417 5,395 5,655 5,754 5,945 Bloomfield T 973 1,016 1,153 1,236 1,350 Broad Top T 1,827 1,687 1,575 1,447 1,328 Coaldale B 146 161 169 181 191 Colerain T 1,147 1,195 1,266 1,324 1,390 Cumberland Valley T 1,494 1,597 1,653 1,736 1,804 East Providence T 1,858 1,854 1,894 1,909 1,938 East Saint Clair T 3,123 3,048 3,220 3,251 3,363 Everett B 1,905 1,834 1,877 1,854 1,869 Harrison T 1,007 972 980 963 961 Hopewell B 222 230 249 262 279 Hopewell T 1,894 2,010 2,040 2,120 2,171 Hyndman B 1,005 910 861 784 723 Juniata T 1,016 954 1,014 1,004 1,034 Kimmel T 1,609 1,616 1,621 1,628 1,633 King T 1,264 1,238 1,249 1,238 1,240 Liberty T 1,477 1,368 1,321 1,238 1,176 Lincoln T 380 425 436 467 486 Londonderry T 1,760 1,856 1,821 1,861 1,858 Mann T 481 500 508 522 533 Manns Choice B 291 300 328 345 368 Monroe T 1,372 1,336 1,359 1,348 1,357 Napier T 2,145 2,198 2,273 2,335 2,404 New Paris B 214 186 169 154 138 Pavia T 325 295 299 283 279 Pleasantville B 211 198 190 179 170 Rainsburg B 146 133 121 110 99 Saint Clairsville B 86 78 73 67 61 Saxton B 803 736 687 625 571 Schellsburg B 316 338 388 422 465 Snake Spring T 1,482 1,639 1,690 1,801 1,878 South Woodbury T 2,000 2,155 2,313 2,470 2,627 Bedford County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2-6 October 2017 SECTION 2: COUNTY PROFILE 2000 2020 2030 2040 Municipality Name 2010 Census Census Projected Projected Projected Southampton T 1,010 976 1,013 1,009 1,029 West Providence T 3,323 3,210 3,213 3,150 3,124 West Saint Clair T 1,647 1,730 1,825 1,913 2,005 Woodbury B 269 284 308 326 348 Woodbury T 1,198 1,263 1,330 1,396 1,463 Source: Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PA DEP) 2012 Notes: B: Borough T: Township According to the 2010–2014 American Community Survey, less than 1 percent of Bedford’s population speaks English less than “very well.” While currently a low percentage, future hazard mitigation strategies should consider addressing language barriers to ensure that all residents can receive emergency instructions.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Phase I National Gateway Clearance Initiative Documentation
    Lead Agencies: Environmental Assessment and Section 4(f) Evaluation Cooperating Agencies: Phase I National Gateway Clearance Initiative epartment of Transportation Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C) September 7, 2010 Pennsylvania Department of Transportation West Virginia Department of Transportation Table of Contents 1. Summary 1 1.1 History of the Initiative 1 1.2 Logical Termini 7 1.3 Need and Purpose 9 1.4 Summary of Impacts and Mitigation 11 1.5 Agency Coordination and Public Involvement 18 1.5.1 Agency Coordination 18 1.5.2 Public Involvement 21 2. Need and Purpose of the Action 22 3. Context of the Action and Development of Alternatives 25 3.1 Overview 25 3.1.1 No Build Alternative 25 3.1.2 Proposed Action 26 3.2 Bridge Removal 26 3.3 Bridge Raising 27 3.4 Bridge Modification 27 3.5 Tunnel Liner Modification 28 3.6 Tunnel Open Cut 28 3.7 Excess Material Disposal 29 3.8 Grade Adjustment 29 3.9 Grade Crossing Closures/Modifications 30 3.10 Other Aspects 30 3.10.1 Interlocking 30 3.10.2 Modal Hubs 30 4. Impacts and Mitigation 31 4.1 Corridor-Wide Impacts 31 i Table of Contents 4.1.1 Right-of-Way 31 4.1.2 Community and Socio-Economic 31 4.1.2.1 Community Cohesion 31 4.1.2.2 Employment Opportunity 31 4.1.2.3 Environmental Justice 34 4.1.2.4 Public Health and Safety 35 4.1.3 Traffic 36 4.1.3.1 Maintenance of Traffic 36 4.1.3.2 Congestion Reduction 37 4.1.4 General Conformity Analysis 37 4.1.4.1 Regulatory Background 37 4.1.4.2 Evaluation 39 4.1.4.3 Construction Emissions 40 4.1.4.4 Conclusion
    [Show full text]
  • Operator Manual EN.Pdf
    Contents Introducing Train Sim World: CSX Heavy Haul...................................................................2 An Introduction to Sand Patch Grade...................................................................................3 Sand Patch Grade Route Map & Key Locations..................................................................4 The Game Modes: Tutorials, Scenarios & Services............................................................5 Basic Terminology......................................................................................................................6 An Introduction to the EMD GP38-2....................................................................................7 Starting the EMD GP38-2........................................................................................................8 Setting up the EMD GP38-2 for Multiple Unit Working................................................10 Setting up the EMD GP38-2 Multiple Unit Lighting Controls......................................13 An Introduction to the EMD SD40-2.................................................................................15 Starting the EMD SD40-2.....................................................................................................16 Setting up the EMD SD40-2 for Multiple Unit Working................................................18 Setting up the EMD SD40-2 Multiple Unit Lighting Controls......................................21 Operating the Alerter on the EMD SD40-2 & EMD GP38-2.......................................23
    [Show full text]
  • CSX Baltimore Division Timetable
    NORTHERN REGION BALTIMORE DIVISION TIMETABLE NO. 4 EFFECTIVE SATURDAY, JANUARY 1, 2005 AT 0001 HOURS CSX STANDARD TIME C. M. Sanborn Division Manager BALTIMORE DIVISION TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL INFORMATION SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS DESCRIPTION PAGE INST DESCRIPTION PAGE 1 Instructions Relating to CSX Operating Table of Contents Rules Timetable Legend 2 Instructions Relating to Safety Rules Legend – Sample Subdivision 3 Instructions Relating to Company Policies Region and Division Officers And Procedures Emergency Telephone Numbers 4 Instructions Relating to Equipment Train Dispatchers Handling Rules 5 Instructions Relating to Air Brake and Train SUBDIVISIONS Handling Rules 6 Instructions Relating to Equipment NAME CODE DISP PAGE Restrictions Baltimore Terminal BZ AV 7 Miscellaneous Bergen BG NJ Capital WS AU Cumberland CU CM Cumberland Terminal C3 CM Hanover HV AV Harrisburg HR NI Herbert HB NI Keystone MH CM Landover L0 NI Lurgan LR AV Metropolitan ME AU Mon M4 AS Old Main Line OM AU P&W PW AS Philadelphia PA AV Pittsburgh PI AS.AT Popes Creek P0 NI RF&P RR CQ S&C SC CN Shenandoah SJ CN Trenton TN NI W&P WP AT CSX Transportation Effective January 1, 2005 Albany Division Timetable No. 5 © Copyright 2005 TIMETABLE LEGEND GENERAL F. AUTH FOR MOVE (AUTHORITY FOR MOVEMENT) Unless otherwise indicated on subdivision pages, the The authority for movement rules applicable to the track segment Train Dispatcher controls all Main Tracks, Sidings, of the subdivision. Interlockings, Controlled Points and Yard Limits. G. NOTES STATION LISTING AND DIAGRAM PAGES Where station page information may need to be further defined, a note will refer to “STATION PAGE NOTES” 1– HEADING listed at the end of the diagram.
    [Show full text]
  • Remaking Hazelwood, Remaking Pittsburgh: a Background Study
    Remaking Hazelwood, i Remaking Pittsburgh a background study ii iii Remaking Hazelwood, Remaking Pittsburgh was prepared by For more information, please contact: Research Associates Elise Gatti and Kim Kinder, under the direction of Luis Rico-Gutierrez, Director of the Remaking Luis Rico-Gutierrez Cities Institute. Director, Remaking Cities Institute/ Associate Dean, College of Fine Arts The RCI would like to thank the Heinz Endowments for their Carnegie Mellon, School of Architecture generous financial support. Additional appreciation is owed College of Fine Arts 201 to Bob Gradeck, Director of Community Projects, Carnegie Pittsburgh, PA Mellon Center for Economic Development and Jim Richter, 15213-3890 USA Executive Director, Hazelwood Initiative, Inc. [p]: 001 (412) 412-268-2349 [e]: [email protected] [w]: http://www.arc.cmu.edu/cmu/rci Copyright © August 2007 Carnegie Mellon School of Architecture [CONTENts] 1 Introduction: Remaking Hazelwood RCI and the Urban Lab: Community-University Collaboration iv 5 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania The Hard Facts ... and the Reasons for Hope 13 Project Stakeholders Owners, Institutions, Community Organizations, and Research Groups 31 Pittsburgh Socio-Geography Regional Context and Development History 41 Hazelwood: Current Conditions Site Overview and Community Context 59 Hazelwood Planning Initiatives Recent Plans and Future Developments 71 Sustainable Development Initiatives Sustainable Development and Eco-Urban Planning [CONTENts] 87 Neighborhood Energy Generation Local and Renewable Urban Energy
    [Show full text]
  • Train Sim World 2020
    © 2019 Dovetail Games, a trading name of RailSimulator.com Limited (“DTG”). All rights reserved. "Dovetail Games", “Train Sim World” and “SimuGraph” are trademarks or registered trademarks of DTG. Unreal® Engine, © 1998-2019, Epic Games, Inc. All rights reserved. Unreal® is a registered trademark of Epic Games. Portions of this software utilise SpeedTree® technology (© 2014 Interactive Data Visualization, Inc.). SpeedTree® is a registered trademark of Interactive Data Visualization, Inc. All rights reserved. CSX and other are trademarks owned by CSX Transportation Intellectual Properties, Inc. and are used here with permission. DB, and the DB logo are trademarks of Deutsche Bahn AG. GWR is a trademark of First Greater Western Ltd. Metro-North Railroad © Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Permission to use the Double Arrow Logo Trade mark is granted by the Secretary of State for Transport. All other copyrights or trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Unauthorised copying, adaptation, rental, re-sale, arcade use, charging for use, broadcast, cable transmission, public performance, distribution or extraction of the product or any trademark or copyright work that forms part of this product is prohibited. Developed and published by DTG. The full credit list can be accessed from the TSW “Options” menu. © 2019 Dovetail Games. All Rights Reserved. Page | 2 Contents Topic Page Introducing Train Sim World 2020 .......................................................................................................... 6 What’s
    [Show full text]
  • (CSX) Meyersdale, PA February 6, 2010
    Federal Railroad Administration Office of Safety Headquarters Assigned Accident Investigation Report HQ-2010-06 CSX Transportation (CSX) Meyersdale, PA February 6, 2010 Note that 49 U.S.C. §20903 provides that no part of an accident or incident report made by the Secretary of Transportation/Federal Railroad Administration under 49 U.S.C. §20902 may be used in a civil action for damages resulting from a matter mentioned in the report. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FRA FACTUAL RAILROAD ACCIDENT REPORT FRA File # HQ-2010-6 FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION 1.Name of Railroad Operating Train #1 1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. CSX Transportation [CSX ] CSX R000072996 2.Name of Railroad Operating Train #2 2a. Alphabetic Code 2b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. N/A N/A N/A 3.Name of Railroad Operating Train #3 3a. Alphabetic Code 3b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. N/A N/A N/A 4.Name of Railroad Responsible for Track Maintenance: 4a. Alphabetic Code 4b. Railroad Accident/Incident No. CSX Transportation [CSX ] CSX R000072996 5. U.S. DOT_AAR Grade Crossing Identification Number 6. Date of Accident/Incident 7. Time of Accident/Incident Month 02 Day 06 Year 2010 02:15:00 AM PM 8. Type of Accident/Indicent 1. Derailment 4. Side collision 7. Hwy-rail crossing 10. Explosion-detonation 13. Other Code (single entry in code box) 2. Head on collision 5. Raking collision 8. RR grade crossing 11. Fire/violent rupture (describe in narrative) 3. Rear end collision 6. Broken Train collision 9. Obstruction 12. Other impacts 01 9. Cars Carrying 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Core PA Transportation System
    PENNSYLVANIA STATE TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE DEFINING A CORE PA TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM FINAL REPORT AUGUST 3, 2006 Pennsylvania State Transportation Advisory Committee The Pennsylvania State Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC) The Pennsylvania State Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC) was established in 1970 by Act 120 of the State Legislature, which also created the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT). The Committee consults with and advises the Secretary of Transportation and the State Transportation Commission and undertakes in-depth studies on important issues as appropriate. Through its public members, the Committee also serves as a valuable liaison between PennDOT and the general public. The Advisory Committee consists of the following members: The Secretary of Transportation; the heads (or their designees) of the Department of Agriculture, Department of Education, Department of Community and Economic Development, Public Utility Commission, Department of Environmental Protection, and the Governor's Policy Office; two members of the State House of Representatives; two members of the State Senate; eighteen public members; seven appointed by the Governor, six by the President Pro Tempore of the Senate, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives. Public members, with experience and knowledge in the transportation of people and goods, are appointed to represent a balanced range of backgrounds (industry, labor, academia, consulting, and research) and the various transportation modes. Appointments are
    [Show full text]
  • Lancaster Mennonite Historical Society Book Auction 1
    Lancaster Mennonite Historical Society Book Auction March 13, 2020 1 Lot Author Title and Description 1 Metzler, Ralph and Valentine Metzler & Anna Nissley Genealogy. Vols. 1-3 complete. Archbold, Ohio: Compilers, 2018. 2838pp (ill, ind, continuously paged, nc). Carolyn 2 The Holy Bible: Containing the Old and New Testaments, Translated out of the Original Tongues. With a Complete Concordance, Embracing Every Passage of Scripture. Millersville, Pa.: B.R. Witmer, 1872. ca. 1600pp in various pagings (gilt edges, ill, includes Apocrypha, family record of Reuben B. Leaman [1863-1917] and Alice Stoner [b. 1861], syp, few loose pp, covers sl warped, front cover and spine cover detached, mc; The Holy Bible, Containing the Old and New Testaments, Translated out of the Original Tongues, Together with the Apocrypha, Concordance and Psalms. Philadelphia: William W. Harding, 1865. 576, 116, [577]-768, 41, 22pp (al, marbled endpapers, family record of Elias Herr [1844-1929] and Lizzie B. Leaman [1845-1901], caif, syp, few loose pp, covers sl worn, gc); The Holy Bible, Containing the Old and New Testaments, Translated out of the Original Tongues, and with the Former Translations Diligently Compared and Revised. With Canne's Marginal Notes and References. Philadelphia: Kimber and Sharpless, [18--]. 570, 112, 571-770, 54pp (al, family record of Henry Leaman [1822-1909] and Sarah Buchwalter [1823- 1901], ds, syp, covers sl worn, clasps missing, front cover detached, mc). 3 The Holy Bible, Containing the Old and New Testaments, Translated out of the Original Tongues, and with the Former Translations Diligently Compared and Revised. New York: American Bible Society, 1867.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft PA State Rail Plan
    This page left blank intentionally Draft 2020 Pennsylvania State Rail Plan [contact information] [All copyright-protected information and images in this document used with permission or a license.] [auspices] [copyright] This page left blank intentionally Executive Summary The 2020 Pennsylvania State Rail Plan includes a comprehensive description and assessment of the current rail system, an analysis of the role of rail and integration within the state’s transportation system, and a vision for the future of passenger and freight rail in the commonwealth. A Rail Service and Investment Program (RSIP) is included to provide guidelines and identify rail investments needed to achieve Pennsylvania’s vision for the rail system in the short (2021–2024) and long range (2025–2045). This State Rail Plan meets the requirements stated in the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) State Rail Plan Guidance issued in September 2013, Section 303 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (PRIIA) (P. L. No. 110-432), and Section 11315 of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act of 2015 (FAST Act) (P. L. No. 114-94). State Rail Vision The 2020 State Rail Vision was developed through a collaborative effort and is intended to provide the framework for passenger and freight rail improvement projects. 2020 State Rail Vision Pennsylvania’s integrated rail system will provide safe, convenient, reliable, cost-effective connections for people and goods. As a viable alternative to other modes, it will support economic competitiveness, smart growth, environmental sustainability, and resiliency, thereby strengthening Pennsylvania’s communities. To achieve this vision, several goals and supporting objectives have been identified.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 State Rail Plan
    This page left blank intentionally 2020 Pennsylvania State Rail Plan Cover photo, top left: Dan Davis Photography Cover photo, top right: AECOM Cover photo, bottom center: PennDOT This page left blank intentionally Executive Summary The 2020 Pennsylvania State Rail Plan includes a comprehensive description and assessment of the current rail system, an analysis of the role of rail and integration within the state’s transportation system, and a vision for the future of passenger and freight rail in the commonwealth. A Rail Service and Investment Program (RSIP) is included to provide guidelines and identify rail investments needed to achieve Pennsylvania’s vision for the rail system in the short (2021–2024) and long range (2025–2045). This State Rail Plan meets the requirements stated in the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) State Rail Plan Guidance issued in September 2013, Section 303 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (PRIIA) (P. L. No. 110-432), and Section 11315 of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act of 2015 (FAST Act) (P. L. No. 114-94). State Rail Vision The 2020 State Rail Vision was developed through a collaborative effort and is intended to provide the framework for passenger and freight rail improvement projects. 2020 State Rail Vision Pennsylvania’s integrated rail system will provide safe, convenient, reliable, cost-effective connections for people and goods. As a viable alternative to other modes, it will support economic competitiveness, smart growth, environmental sustainability, and resiliency, thereby strengthening Pennsylvania’s communities. To achieve this vision, several goals and supporting objectives have been identified.
    [Show full text]
  • Sand Patch Grade
    Sand Patch Grade Famed and historic Sand Patch Grade – in its modern form as a heavy-haul artery of railroading giant CSX – will be the first route featured in the upcoming, new-technology Train Sim World. With extraordinary realism, authenticity, and stunning life-like visuals, “CSX Heavy Haul” promises to bring challenging, big-time North American railroading to dramatic life! Diese Strecke ist Teil des Release Titels: CSX Heavy Haul Erhältlich auf Steam: http://store.steampowered.com/app/530070/ Zum Preis von: 29,99€ (Standard Preis ohne jegliche Rabatte) Zitat von Dovetail Games Famed and historic Sand Patch Grade – in its modern form as a heavy-haul artery of railroading giant CSX – will be the first route featured in the upcoming, new-technology Train Sim World. With extraordinary realism, authenticity, and stunning life-like visuals, “CSX Heavy Haul” promises to bring challenging, big-time North American railroading to dramatic life! The Baltimore & Ohio – America’s first common-carrier railroad – built Sand Patch, opening this important and demanding east-west route over the rugged Allegheny Mountains in the early 1870s. To lift the B&O’s endless armada of heavy trains over the rugged spine of the Alleghenies, Sand Patch Grade climbed from Cumberland, Maryland at an elevation of 627 feet above sea level to the line’s summit at Sand Patch, Pennsylvania and a rail elevation of 2,258 feet. From the Sand Patch summit, then the line began a westward descent toward Rockwood, Pennsylvania (elevation1,837 feet). Today, nearly a century-and-a-half after its hard-won creation, Sand Patch Grade serves as a critical and busy steel path for CSX and the railroad’s tonnage moving between the U.
    [Show full text]
  • Aliquippa & Southern (ALQS)
    Comprehensive Rail Freight Study and State Rail Plan Volume I 2003 Pennsylvania State Rail Plan Pennsylvania Department of Transportation R.L. Banks & Associates, Inc. Washington, DC And Linare Consulting Pittsburgh, PA June 16, 2003 Volume I State Rail Plan Preface This is Volume I of the 2003 update of the Commonwealth's legislatively mandated Comprehensive Rail Freight Study and State Rail Plan. The entire study is published in two volumes, which include discussion and results of study tasks as indicated below. Volume I State Rail Plan Subtask A-2 Line by line traffic census Core or strategic rail lines At risk rail lines Subtask A-3 Key issues Subtask B-1 Survey of local planning organizations (conclusions) Task C Funding Options Subtask D-1 State rail plan summary descriptions of rail service Volume II Additional Rail Study Results Subtask A-1 Level of maintenance and capital expenditures Subtask A-2 Impacts of At-grade highway/railroad crossings and heavier railcars Subtask B-1 Survey of local planning organizations Subtask B-2 Review freight studies In addition, Subtask D-2 updated the existing statewide rail network data base information in the Department's Geographic Information Systems (GIS) data network. Comprehensive Rail Freight Study and State Rail Plan Volume I 2003 Pennsylvania State Rail Plan Table of Contents Page Executive Summary and Conclusions ES-1 Introduction 1 Background 1 Objectives of Pennsylvania's Rail Freight Assistance Program 5 Rail Planning and Coordination 5 Description of State's Railroad Network 7 Key Issues 39 Funding Options 63 Figures Freight Railroad Traffic in Pennsylvania 2 Tables 1 Traffic Density, 286,000-pound Railcar Capability and Number of Bridges on Pennsylvania's Rail Lines 8 2 Pennsylvania Rail Lines with Annual Traffic Less than One Million Gross Tons 20 3 Pennsylvania State Investment in Rail Freight Infrastructure 41 4 Approximate Future Annual Infrastructure Costs 71 - i - ES-1 Pennsylvania 2003 State Rail Plan Executive Summary Purpose.
    [Show full text]