BRT LRT Metro Comparison.Pptx

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

BRT LRT Metro Comparison.Pptx Rapid transit options Let’s create streets for “people”, not for “vehicles” Cars don’t own our streets! METRO RAIL Light Rail Transit (LRT) Los Angeles MONORAIL METROBUS Rio Key features of high quality transit METROBUS METRORAIL LRT MONO Dedicated ROW Safe, easy step less boarding Electronic fare payment Real-time passenger information High quality service can attract users from personal vehicles But BRT does some things that others don’t. METRO METRO LRT MONO BUS RAIL Quick & easy access to stations / Capacity over > 20,000 pphpd Multiple services per corridor Express services Affordability for customers & the city Buses are more popular across the world London Mexico City Hong Kong Rail Rail 14% Rail 38% 43% Bus Bus 62% Bus 57% 86% Singapore Chennai Delhi Rail Rail Rail 21% 10% 39% Bus 61% Bus Bus 79% 90% METRO BUS Reference: Bus Rapid Transit: Planning Guide, 2007, p. 70. METRO BUS Reference: Bus Rapid Transit: Planning Guide, 2007, p. 70. What will Ũ1,000 crore accomplish? Underground metro: 2.5 km Elevated metro: 5.0 km Monorail: 6.7 km METRO BUS: 67 km Rapid expansion of Janmarg network 2009 2013 2014 12.5 km 67 km 88 km 45,00,00,00,000 5% 85% 21,50,00,00,000 Dedicated ROW: median bus lanes Dedicated central lanes • Dedicated lanes: – Quicker travel times – Buses can stay on schedule – The same fleet can carry more passengers in a day • Central alignment: – Reduced conflict with cycles & other slow vehicles – Less interference from parked vehicles – Lower driver fatigue Metrobus on streets Monorails occupy more space than Metrobus Using Road Space Efficiently Capacity: 3-lane carriageway passengers per hour 3,000 per direction 2 lanes + elevated road 4,700 Dedicated lanes for bus rapid transit 12,000 + Station-bus interface 170 High ceiling with 42 partial roof cover 57 over bus Minimal gap for easy boarding 210 Platform extension (< 125mm) (200 mm) to ensure safe distance 75 between bus and station Platform and bus floor at same level (e.g. 900 mm) Clear Passenger information systems • In stations: audio and visual destination and arrival time of next bus • In buses: audio and visual announcement of next station stop Real Time System Management JanmargSystem control monitoring center Efficient fare collection Prepaid ticketing with smart cards & turnstiles • Separation of money collection from fare validation prevents leakage • Automated ridership data can be used for operational planning BRT can attract personal vehicle users Other 2% Car Auto 7% Shared 13% 2W auto 12% 7% Former mode used by passengers of Janmarg in Ahmedabad Bus 59% Source: Janmarg Month 20 report Easy station access Multiple services per corridor Jakarta BRT trunk services (closed system) Direct services in the Pune Metro Region Chinchwad Pimpri Sangavi Hinjewadi Passing lanes for express services Limited & local services in Bogotá Ensuring quality: The BRT Standard Mexico City 24 m ROW 24 m ROW Paris Mexico city 20 m ROW 20 m ROW MG Road (20 m) MG Road (20 m) Supporting elements Providing better access to BRT stations High quality footpaths & cycle tracks Integration with paratransit Implementation process Where to start? SPV ASAP! • Create a special purpose vehicle (SPV) to demonstrate transformation. SPV is positioned as: – Newly created, independent entity. – Fresh competent professionals recruited for SPU executive team. – Its CEO is directly answerable to the Municipal Commissioner. • SPV role: – SPV is NOT an operator. It’s a lean, focused management and monitoring unit. – It retains the role of operations planning and business planning but hires contractors for operations. Effective PPP structure Government (SPV) Private bus operator • Sets operating • Operates the buses parameters • Carries out maintenance • Monitors system performance • Receives all fare Fare collection operator revenue • Issues tickets and • Reimburses operators collects revenue for services performed (with penalties, where Other operators applicable) • Station maintenance, security, etc SPV structure Board of Directors Managing Director Planning & Communications Operations Admin & finance design and marketing • Route planning • Scheduling • Financial • Public information • Infrastructure • Fleet monitoring management strategy design • Fare collection • Contracting & • User surveys • Business model • Quality control payments • Corporate identity • Financial • Human resources • Marketing analysis • Physical resources • Media relations • Long-term vision • Legal Implementation timeline year 1 year 2 year 3 SPV formation Design consultants Infrastructure contract Bus operations contract Bus procurement IT contract IT procurement Testing Marketing Road Survey Data MSRTC Operaons data Stations & Network Corridors terminals IdenKficaon Concept Design Operaons Study Detailing Detailing Operaons Plan ContracKng ContracKng Operaons ConstrucKon ConstrucKon Starts ITS Fleet Bus Fare Management Procurement Collecon Tender Tender Tender System System Bus setup Setup Manufacturing Equipment Equipment Procurement Bus Delivery Procurement and TesKng Fare collecKon Fleet Control Operaons & & Revenue ReporKng Starts distribuKon Next steps • Conduct stakeholder consultations: – With relevant public agencies – With citizen groups and other stakeholders • Establish SPV for BRT • Submit proposal to State/National Govt for funding • Begin on-street parking management and enforcement Support ITDP will provide • Institutional structure and training of SPV staff • Service planning • TORs for consultants: – Engineering and architecture consultants for design of corridors, stations, terminals, depots, and other infrastructure – Communications and passenger information • RFPs for service providers: – Bus operations – IT services • Monitoring of consultant work Questions? www.brtstandard.org www.itdp.org .
Recommended publications
  • Transit Service Design Guidelines
    Transit Service Design Guidelines Department of Rail and Public Transportation November 2008 Transit Service Design Guidelines Why were these guidelines for new transit service developed? In FY2008 alone, six communities in Virginia contacted the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation about starting new transit service in their community. They and many other communities throughout Virginia are interested in learning how new transit services can enhance travel choices and mobility and help to achieve other goals, such as quality of life, economic opportunity, and environmental quality. They have heard about or seen successful transit systems in other parts of the state, the nation, or the world, and wonder how similar systems might serve their communities. They need objective and understandable information about transit and whether it might be appropriate for them. These guidelines will help local governments, transit providers and citizens better understand the types of transit systems and services that are available to meet community and regional transportation needs. The guidelines also help the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation (DRPT) in making recommendations to the Commonwealth Transportation Board for transit investments, by 1) providing information on the types of systems or services that are best matched to community needs and local land use decisions, and 2) ensuring that resources are used effectively to achieve local, regional, and Commonwealth goals. Who were these guidelines developed for? These guidelines are intended for three different audiences: local governments, transit providers and citizens. Therefore, some will choose to read the entire document while others may only be interested in certain sections.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between Safety, Capacity, and Operating Speed on Bus Rapid Transit
    THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SAFETY, CAPACITY, AND OPERATING SPEED ON BUS RAPID TRANSIT NICOLAE DUDUTA,EMBARQ CLAUDIA ADRIAZOLA-STEIL,EMBARQ DARIO HIDALGO, EMBARQ LUIS ANTONIO LINDAU,EMBARQ PAULA MANOELA DOS SANTOS, EMBARQ EMAIL FOR CORRESPONDENCE: [email protected] This is an abridged version of the paper presented at the conference. The full version is being submitted elsewhere. Details on the full paper can be obtained from the author. The Relationship between Safety, Capacity, and Operating Speed on Bus Rapid Transit DUDUTA, Nicolae; ADRIAZOLA-STEIL Claudia; HIDALGO, Dario; LINDAU, Luis Antonio; SANTOS, Paula Manoela; THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SAFETY, CAPACITY, AND OPERATING SPEED ON BUS RAPID TRANSIT CASE STUDY: TRANSOESTE BRT, RIO DE JANEIRO Nicolae Duduta1, Claudia Adriazola-Steil1, Dario Hidalgo1, Luis Antonio Lindau2, Paula Manoela dos Santos2 1: EMBARQ – the WRI Center for Sustainable Transport, 10 G St. NE Suite 800, Washington DC, 2: EMBARQ Brasil, Rua Luciana de Abreu, 471/801 90570-060 Porto Alegre/RS, Brazil Email for correspondence: [email protected] th 13 WCTR, 2013 – Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 1 The Relationship between Safety, Capacity, and Operating Speed on Bus Rapid Transit DUDUTA, Nicolae; ADRIAZOLA-STEIL Claudia; HIDALGO, Dario; LINDAU, Luis Antonio; SANTOS, Paula Manoela; ABSTRACT There is a growing body of research on the traffic safety aspects of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) corridors in Latin American cities. The findings suggest that some BRT design features – such as center lane configurations, left turn prohibitions, and signalized mid-block pedestrian crossings with refuge islands – can significantly improve safety on the corridors where BRTs operate. However, there is still a gap in knowledge about how the different safety features might impact the operational performance of the BRT.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison Between Bus Rapid Transit and Light-Rail Transit Systems: a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Approach
    Urban Transport XXIII 143 COMPARISON BETWEEN BUS RAPID TRANSIT AND LIGHT-RAIL TRANSIT SYSTEMS: A MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS APPROACH MARÍA EUGENIA LÓPEZ LAMBAS1, NADIA GIUFFRIDA2, MATTEO IGNACCOLO2 & GIUSEPPE INTURRI2 1TRANSyT, Transport Research Centre, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain 2Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture (DICAR), University of Catania, Italy ABSTRACT The construction choice between two different transport systems in urban areas, as in the case of Light-Rail Transit (LRT) and Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) solutions, is often performed on the basis of cost-benefit analysis and geometrical constraints due to the available space for the infrastructure. Classical economic analysis techniques are often unable to take into account some of the non-monetary parameters which have a huge impact on the final result of the choice, since they often include social acceptance and sustainability aspects. The application of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) techniques can aid decision makers in the selection process, with the possibility to compare non-homogeneous criteria, both qualitative and quantitative, and allowing the generation of an objective ranking of the different alternatives. The coupling of MCDA and Geographic Information System (GIS) environments also permits an easier and faster analysis of spatial parameters, and a clearer representation of indicator comparisons. Based on these assumptions, a LRT and BRT system will be analysed according to their own transportation, economic, social and environmental impacts as a hypothetical exercise; moreover, through the use of MCDA techniques a global score for both systems will be determined, in order to allow for a fully comprehensive comparison. Keywords: BHLS, urban transport, transit systems, TOPSIS.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 Introduction
    CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND 1.1.1 Pune is well known as the ‘Queen of Deccan’ due to its scenic beauty and rich natural resources. Besides, it is famous for its religious and historical places. Pune city is known in the world map because of its educational, research and development institutions. The district also has an importance as an important military base. Pune is the most industrialized district in western Maharastra and a famous IT hub in the country. Pune exemplifies an indigenous Marathi culture and ethos, in which education, arts & crafts and theaters are given due prominence. Pune is the cultural capital of Maharastra. It is the birth place of the poet-saint Tukaram. It is the home of great freedom fighters like Bal Gangadhar Tilak, Agarkar and Gopal Krishna Gokhale. Jayant Narlikar, the famous contemporary scientist is from Pune. 1.1.2 Location - Pune district is located between 17 0 54’ and 10 0 24’ North latitude and 73 019 and 75 0 10’ East longitude. The district has geographical area of 15.642 sq km. The district is bound by Ahmadnagar district on the north-east, Solapur district on the south-east, Satara district on south, Raigad district on the west and Thane district on the north-west. Pune district forms a part of the tropical monsoon land and therefore shows a significant seasonal variation in temperature as well as rainfall conditions. Climate of the western region of Pune is cool whereas the eastern part is hot and dry. 1.1.3 Earhquake Prone Areas – Due to the presence of many structural hills within Pune district, it is likely place for earthquakes.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Pune City's Mobility Ecosystem
    ———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— An Introduction to Pune City’s Mobility Ecosystem ——— URBAN MOBILITY LAB AUGUST 2018 ———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— www.rmi.org/pune 1 Table of contents ————— 03 Executive Summary 04 Introduction: The Urban Mobility Lab and contenPune as the First Lighthouse City 06 Pune City Needs Assessment Process and Objectives 09 Pune’s Stakeholder Ecosystem 14 Overview of Existing Policies and Projects 17 Challenges in Pune’s Mobility System 18 Opportunities for the Urban Mobility Lab to Support Pune’s Mobility System 19 Findings From Expert Interviews ————— Images: Shutterstock / iStock For further enquiries, please contact us at [email protected] 2 As part of the Urban Mobility Lab, Pune will host a 1. Public transit and non-motorized transit (NMT) have Executive multiday Solutions Workshop in October 2018, bringing been identified as the strong backbone of Pune’s together selected project teams, government officials, transportation system, and represent the biggest Summary and subject-matter experts with the goals of gathering opportunity for continued improvement and potential a common awareness and understanding of the city’s integration with new mobility solutions. ————— mobility ecosystem, supporting the development and implementation of a portfolio of mobility studies and 2. Pune has a portfolio of thoughtfully designed and Pune has been selected as the first pilot projects, and exploring opportunities for integration detailed policies and plans. There is an opportunity Lighthouse City as part of the Urban between projects and organizations. to support the timely implementation of proposed solutions through a structured and purposeful executiveMobility Lab, a program initiated by the In preparation for the Pune Solutions Workshop, RMI integration framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Sufficiency Evaluation of Pune Metro Rail Networks (IJIRST/ Volume 2 / Issue 12/ 071)
    IJIRST –International Journal for Innovative Research in Science & Technology| Volume 2 | Issue 12 | May 2016 ISSN (online): 2349-6010 Sufficiency Evaluation of Pune Metro Rail Networks Akshay Salunke Suraj Alhat Student Student Department of Civil Engineering Department of Civil Engineering Pimpri Chinchwad College of Engineering Nigdi, Pimpri Chinchwad College of Engineering Nigdi, Maharashtra, India Maharashtra, India Mayur Dalvi Suraj Dubal Student Student Department of Civil Engineering Department of Civil Engineering Pimpri Chinchwad College of Engineering Nigdi, Pimpri Chinchwad College of Engineering Nigdi, Maharashtra, India Maharashtra, India Abstract As India is one of the fastest developing country in world the metro rail network plays an important role in cities transport system so it is now need of future to have an efficient and well effective metro rail network in city. The objective of this research is a preliminary examination of metro rail network extensiveness versus the city’s needs, aiming to assist the estimation of the adequacy of a metro network. This study is concentrated on comparing mature metro system in several large European cities with Indian cities based on a selection of indicators relating metro network characteristics i.e. Length and no. of stations, city characteristics eg. Population and density. A methodology exploiting these macroscopic characteristics in a strategic planning context was developed and a combination of related indicators is proposed. This methodology is applied for the estimation of the degree of adequacy of the current Athens, Greece metro network in a relation to city’s needs. Findings indicate that the Athens metro network cannot be yet characterized as adequate and specific proposals are made in terms of future network extensions.
    [Show full text]
  • PEOPLE NEAR TRANSIT, TRANSIT NEAR PEOPLE Shaping Public Transit to Serve Maximum, Pollute Minimum May 2019
    PEOPLE NEAR TRANSIT, TRANSIT NEAR PEOPLE Shaping public transit to serve maximum, pollute minimum May 2019 The Institute for Transportation and Development Policy works around the world to design and implement high quality transport and urban development systems and policy solutions that make cities more livable, equitable, and sustainable. This project is part of the International Climate Initiative (IKI) contents contents What is People Near Transit? 3 Comparison with Best 29 1 Practices Who benefits? 3 4 Highlights of the Pune PNT 8 Analysis 5 Recommendations 30 About Pune and 9 2 Pimpri-Chinchwad How the twin cities commute? 11 6 Glossary 31 3 Pune PNT Analysis 13 Density Distribution 13 People near Bus Transit 15 People near Frequent Transit 17 People near Rapid Transit 19 Notified Slums near Frequent 21 Transit School Children near Frequent 23 Transit Employment Centres near Frequent 25 Transit Frequency Heat Map of PMPML 27 Service 1 2 1 What is People Near Transit? In an urban environment, access to any form of transit within a comfortable walking distance is critical for the selection of a mode of transportation. The lack of walkability to public transport, along with the deficiency of other vital factors like frequency and safety, often result in people shifting towards unsustainable transport modes like personal motor vehicles. People near Transit (PNT) is an effective proxy indicator to measure how well a city provides transit access to its residents. It aids in assessing urban transport systems and services while exposing the accessibility gaps in the existing systems. Furthermore, the analysis facilitates the integration of land use and transportation, while providing guidance on the planning of future transit corridors with better frequencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Rapid Transit As Formalization: Accessibility Impacts of Transport Reform in Cape Town, South Africa
    Bus rapid transit as formalization: Accessibility impacts of transport reform in Cape Town, South Africa by Lisa Rayle A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in City & Regional Planning in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Associate Professor Daniel Chatman, Chair Professor Emeritus Robert Cervero Professor Emerita Elizabeth Deakin Associate Professor Alison Post Fall 2017 Bus rapid transit as formalization: Accessibility impacts of transport reform in Cape Town, South Africa Copyright 2017 by Lisa Rayle 1 Abstract Bus rapid transit as formalization: Accessibility impacts of transport reform in Cape Town, South Africa by Lisa Rayle Doctor of Philosophy in City & Regional Planning University of California, Berkeley Associate Professor Daniel Chatman, Chair Many cities worldwide are introducing bus rapid transit (BRT) into contexts where informal transport modes serve a substantial part of the public transport market. These BRT initia- tives are intended, among other goals, to formalize existing transport systems and to improve accessibility. However, the extent to which BRT reforms actually improve residents' ability to reach activities remains in question. In this dissertation, I contribute to the empirical and theoretical literature on informal transport by investigating how BRT reform has impacted accessibility for residents of Cape Town, South Africa. How have Cape Town's transport reforms affected accessibility and its distribution amongst different population groups? Why have reforms had these effects? I address these questions using three methods: (1) an accessibility index computed using a transport network model, (2) a difference-in-difference approach using intercept survey data, and (3) interviews with users and stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Corrigendum.I!
    ( ( CORRIGENDUM.I! Name of work: RFP for Empanelment as General Consultant (GCl for various Projects of Maha-Metro Tender no ( Ma ha-Metro) : Ml/Consul -O3l 2OL9 S. No Clause No. As given in Empanelment Document Suggestions/Cla rifications Reply 1. Page 6 - Copy of client certificate in support of the details It is very difficult to get this information from The client certificate supporting the project Letter of like consultancy cost and scope of work, nature of the client in such a short notice specially for wise consultancy fees received can be lnvitation work for the above consultancy contract should clients located overseas. Hence, we request submitted by the bidder post award of Point 5.2 also be given for all such eligible project separately (c) MAHA-Metro to accept a copy of the JV contract, if not available at the time of agreement between the consortium submission of RFP. However, if the credentials members used by the bidder are found to be false then the contract, if awarded, will be terminated and Performance Bank Guarantee amount will be forfeited by Maha-Metro. Maha-Metro also reserves the right to proceed with the tender process further duly ignoring defaulting Consu lta nt. 2. Page 6 - The applicant/consortium has to explain the As per company policy we are unable to The clause stands modified as Letter of capability of in-house experts for all the four disclose the actual salary drawn by the lnvitation " The applicant/consortium has to explain the services namely civil, traction, rolling stock and experts.
    [Show full text]
  • Maharashtra Metro Rail Corporation Limited (A Joint Venture of Govt
    Maha-Metro August-2019 Maharashtra Metro Rail Corporation Limited (A Joint Venture of Govt. of India & Govt. of Maharashtra) (Pune Metro Rail Project) Name of Work: - Modification Of 110 KV Railway Transmission Line at Khadki, By Laying 132 KV Underground Cable. Tender No: - P1US-01/2019 AUGUST-2019 MAHARASHTRA METRO RAIL CORPORATION LIMITED (A joint venture of Govt. of India & Govt. of Maharashtra) 101, The Orion, Opposite Don Bosco Youth Centre, Koregaon Park, Pune 411001 E-mail : [email protected] Website : www.metrorailpune.com; URL E-Tender portal https://mahametrorail.etenders.in Pune Metro Rail Project 01 Maha-Metro August-2019 INDEX SR.NO PARTICULRS PAGE NO. 1. NIT SECTION-1 2. Instructions To the Bidder SECTION-2 3. Eligibility Criteria for single entity (sole bidder) 4. Instructions To the Bidder for single entity (sole bidder) 5. Eligibility Criteria for JV/Consortium 6. Instructions To the Bidder for JV/Consortium bidder SECTION-3 7. Tool Kit for using E-Tender portal of Maha-Metro SECTION-4 8. Bidding & Contract Form SECTION-5 9. General Condition of Contract SECTION-6 10. Special Condition of Contract SECTION-7 11. Specifications 12. Approved Vendor List of MSEDCL & MSETCL as annexure- A &B SECTION-8 13. Financial Bid Note: - The Bidder is advised to verify the documents mentioned in the above index & sign the index ascertaining of having verified Pune Metro Rail Project 02 Maha-Metro August-2019 NOTICE INVITING BID (NIT) E-Tender NOTICE MAHARASHTRA METRO RAIL CORPORATION LIMITED (Pune Metro Rail Project) (A joint venture of Govt. of India & Govt. of Maharashtra) 101, The Orion, Opposite Don Bosco Youth Centre, Koregaon Park, Pune 411001 Email: [email protected] Website: www.punemetrorail.org Tel.: 020-26051072 Bid Notice No.
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic Methodologies for Bus Rapid Transit Corridors: Recommended Guidance September 2019
    Traffic Methodologies for Bus Rapid Transit Corridors: Recommended Guidance September 2019 Report prepared for FDOT Contract Number: C9N85 Task Work Order 34: Traffic Methodologies for Bus Rapid Transit Corridors Recommended Guidance September 2019 Prepared By: CDM Smith 101 Southhall Lane, Suite 200 Maitland, FL 32751 Prepared for: Gabrielle Mathews Chris A. Wiglesworth Florida Department of Transportation, Transit Office 605 Suwannee Street, MS 26 Tallahassee, FL 32399 Phone: (850) 414-4532 Email: [email protected].Ň.us TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 Topic Overview ................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose of This Guidance .................................................................................................................... 2 Report Organization ........................................................................................................................... 3 Understanding the Process and Key Concepts ........................................................................................ 5 The Transit Project Planning Process and Stages of Traffic Analysis ................................................... 5 Traffic Analysis During Programming and Alternatives Screening (TCAR Process).......................... 5 Traffic Analysis During Project Development and
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Bus Rapid Transit?
    WHAT IS BUS RAPID TRANSIT? June 18, 2018 Annie Weinstock BRT Planning International, 2018 WHAT DOES BRT LOOK LIKE? Curitiba, Brazil built Photo: Tony IP Green Architects the first BRT in 1974 BRT Planning International, 2018 WHAT DOES BRT LOOK LIKE? TransMilenio (Bogota) broke all speed and capacity records of all previous BRTs, making BRT a true alternative to rail. BRT Planning International, 2018 WHAT DOES BRT LOOK LIKE? MyCiTi BRT, Cape Town, South Africa BRT Planning International, 2018 WHAT DOES BRT LOOK LIKE? Photo: Annie Weinstock, ITDP EmX BRT, Eugene, BRT Planning International, 2018OR WHAT DOES BRT LOOK LIKE? Photo: Far East Mobility Lanzhou BRT: BRT Planning International,China 2018 WHAT DOES BRT LOOK LIKE? Source: Minasit.com.br Belo Horizonte, BRT Planning International,Brazil 2018 WHAT DOES BRT LOOK LIKE? Guangzhou BRT: BRT Planning International,China 2018 WHAT DOES BRT LOOK LIKE? Photo: ITDP Yichang BRT: BRT Planning International,China 2018 WHAT DOES BRT LOOK LIKE? HealthLine BRT: Cleveland,BRT PlanningOH International, 2018 WHAT DOES BRT LOOK LIKE? Mexico City’s Line 4 BRT through the historic city center BRT Planning International, 2018 WHAT DOES BRT LOOK LIKE? Photo: Annie Weinstock, ITDP Los Angeles Orange Line BRT BRT Planning International, 2018 WHAT DOES BRT LOOK LIKE? Hartford-New Britain BRT BRT Planning International, 2018 AND WHAT ABOUT THESE? Photo: Mass Transit Magazine Seattle BRT RapidRidePlanning International, 2018 AND WHAT ABOUT THESE? Photo: BKLYNER Bx12 New York City SBSBRT Planning International, 2018 AND WHAT ABOUT THESE? Photo: myciti.org.za The Cape Town CBD system differs from the Table View corridor BRT Planning International, 2018 THE BRT STANDARD The BRT Standard was created by a committee of experts who designed many of the highest performing BRT systems in the world.
    [Show full text]