DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bibliography Bibliography Manuscripts Bodleian Library, University of Oxford. Early Modern Letters Online. http://emlo.bodleian.ox.ac.uk. mss Ashmole 1813, 1816, 1817b, 1820a, 1829, 1830. Letters of Martin Lister primarily to and from Edward Lhwyd and Robert Plot. ms Lister 1. “A Method for the History of Iron,” a “sketch” of a treatise by Lister, unfin- ished. Book one only seven chapters; folios 56–177 are blank. ms Lister 2. Letters to Lister from Foreign Correspondents. ms Lister 3 and ms Lister 4. Letters to Lister from Domestic Correspondents. ms Lister 5. Papers, notes, and extracts by, or owned by, Dr Martin Lister about 1660–1710, chiefly on natural science, medicine, or botany. ms Lister 7. On the fossils of England, more particularly such as are found in these Northern parts. ms Lister 8. Commonplace book on matters of medicine and natural science. ms Lister 10. Commonplace book on theological and moral subjects. ms Lister 19. A copy of Every man’s companion, or a An useful pocket book (London, 1661), with notes by Lister about his journey to Paris and Montpellier in 1663–1666. Digital version: http://listerstravels.modhist.ox.ac.uk ms Lister 33. Notes by Lister on the correct usage of Latin in medicine, specimens of descriptions of persons. mss Lister 34–37. Letters addressed to Lister chiefly on scientific subjects, 1671–1710. Each volume contains nearly complete indexes of writers and subjects. ms Lister 39. Miscellaneous notes and papers by, relating to, or in the possession of Lister. Many are extracts from the Philosophical Transactions; folio 218 lists Dr Lister’s books that he sent to the Ashmolean Museum. Borthwick Institute, York. Diocesan Courts of the Bishopric of York, reference cp.H.3170. Case for sexual slander brought by Juliana Forster [Foster], wife of John Forster, against John Peck, 1674. British Library, London. ms Additional 22596. Papers, chiefly in the handwriting of the Rev. W. Huddesford, Keeper of the Ashmolean Museum [1767–1772], relative to the life of Dr Martin Lister. ms Harley 3783, f. 90. Letter from Henry Paman to William Sancroft, 2 March 1653. 880 Bibliography ms Sloane 1393, f. 13. Agreement of the Corporation of Physicians at York. ms Sloane 1929. Comments by Nehemiah Grew on Lister’s theories of plant circula- tion and his critique of Grew’s Anatomy of Plants. ms Sloane 3306–15. Papers of Henry Paman, M.D. ms Stowe 175, fol. 138. Letter from Thomas Kirke to Martin Lister, 3 June 1677. ms Stowe 745, fol. 105. Letter from Martin Lister to Ralph Thoresby, 29 May 1675. Centre for Buckinghamshire Studies, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire. Bishop’s Transcripts for Radclive for the years 1638 and 1639. Microfilm reference number M45/72. King’s College, University of Cambridge. ms Keynes 136, William Stukeley’s memoir of Newton, sent to Richard Mead in four installments (26 June to 22 July 1727), each with a covering letter to Mead. Lincolnshire County Archives, Lincoln. Conveyance of Manor/Lordship of Calceby by Sir Martin Lister to Massingberd with acquittances and deedpoll. Reference 1/mm/2/11/40a. Diocese of Lincoln Presentation Deed, 1630, n. 37. Jane Lister’s Acquittance for Papers of Sir Drayner Massingberd. mm 6/8/1/5–6. Settlement on the marriage of George Gregory, Esq., with Susannah Lister, 21 April 1662. 1. pg. 3/5/1/3. National Archives, Kew. Equity Pleadings, Court of Chancery, 1671. C 6/208/57. Record for the Committee for the Advance of Money, 1643. pso 6/1, volume 79. State Papers Domestic, James I, 1611–1618 (5 April 1617). Will of Sir Matthew Lister. pro, prob 11/261. Natural History Museum, London. mss Ray 1. Ray Correspondence, Botany Library. New College Archives, University of Oxford. ms nc 39. Register of fines for leases, 1629–1788, with notes on the computation of fines and on estate matters, 1 vol., 1629–1788. ms nc 3578 with 2371. Copies of terrier and rentals of New College property in vari- ous counties, 1 vol., 17th and 18th centuries. ms nc 4110 Court Rolls, 1603–1647, Radclive, Buckinghamshire. Northamptonshire Record Office, Northampton. E(B) 672. Indenture Agreement for Sir Martin Lister, 20 October 1643..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Robert Plot (1641—1696)
    ( 218 ) SOME EARLY BRITISH ORNITHOLOGISTS AND THEIR WORKS. BY W. H. MULLENS, SI.A., LL.M., M.B.O.U. V.—ROBERT PLOT (1641—1696) AND SOME EARLY COUNTY NATURAL HISTORIES. IN the year 1661, Joshua Childrey (1623—1670), antiquary, schoolmaster, and divine, published in London a small duodecimo work entitled " Britannia Baconia: / or, the Natural / Rarities / of / England, Scotland, & Wales." This book, although of no particular value in itself, being merely a brief and somewhat imperfect compilation, was nevertheless destined to be of some considerable influence on the literature of natural history in this country. For, according to Wood's " Athense Oxonienses" (p. 339), it inspired Robert Plot (1641—1696), the first keeper of the Ashmolean Museum at Oxford, with the idea of writing the " Natural History of Oxfordshire," which appeared in 1677, and which was followed in 1686 by a " Natural History of Staffordshire," the work of the same author ; who is said to have also contemplated similar histories of Middlesex and Kent. These two works of Robert Plot's also proved in their turn to be the forerunners of a numerous series of county natural histories by different writers. The full title of the " Natural History of Oxfordshire" is as follows :— " The / Natural History / of / Oxford-shire, / being an Essay toward the Natural History / of / England. / By R.P., LL.D. / [quotation from Arat. in Phsenom.] / [engraving] Printed at the Theater in Oxford, and are to be had there: / And in London at Mr. S. Millers, at the Star near the / West-end of SOME EARLY BRITISH ORNITHOLOGISTS.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural History of Staffordshire Printed in Oxford in 1686, the Subject of This Article
    THE NATURAL HISTORY OF STAFFORD-SHIRE. By Robert Plot, LLD. Keeper of the Ashmolean Musæum and Professor of Chymistry in the University of Oxford. Ye shall Describe the Land, and bring the Description hither to Me. Joshua 8. v. 6. Oxford printed at the Theatre, Anno M. DC. LXXXVI. (1686) by Yasha Beresiner Introduction This volume, now in the Masonic Library of the Regular Grand Lodge of Italy, contains the earliest recorded account of accepted masonry and is considered the most implicit report on the fraternity available for the period at the end of the 17th century. It is printed in paragraphs 85 to 88 inclusive, on pages 316 to 318 of the tome. This text is referred to as the Plot Abstract. Its importance lies a) with regard to its content i.e. the summary of the legendary history, the description of contemporary freemasonry, and the criticisms of the fraternity and b) as to the sources from which Plot may have derived his information, most importantly, what he refers to as the ‘large parchment volum they have amongst them . .’ The purpose of this article is not to analyse the text and its content but rather to identify and clarify the reasons behind the importance of this Volume in the context of Masonic bibliography and history. Robert Plot Robert Plot (1640-96) was born in Kent and received a BA degree from Oxford University in 1661, an MA in 1664 and a Law degrees in 1671. In 1677 he was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society and became Secretary in 1682.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rediscovery of Roman Baths in Eighteenth-Century Britain
    This is a repository copy of An Elusive Legacy: The Rediscovery of Roman Baths in Eighteenth-Century Britain. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/140325/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Savani, G orcid.org/0000-0002-8076-9535 (2019) An Elusive Legacy: The Rediscovery of Roman Baths in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Britannia, 50. pp. 13-48. ISSN 0068-113X https://doi.org/10.1017/S0068113X19000023 © The Author(s) 2019. Published by The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies.This article has been published in a revised form in Britannia https://doi.org/10.1017/S0068113X19000023. This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution, re-sale or use in derivative works. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ An Elusive Legacy: The Rediscovery of Roman Baths in Eighteenth-Century Britain By GIACOMO SAVANI ABSTRACT In this paper, I investigate how eighteenth-century antiquarians engaged with the remains of Roman bath buildings in Britain and discuss their multifaceted attitude towards the ancient practice of bathing, with a focus on the city of Bath.
    [Show full text]
  • Portrait of Martin Lister in This Book Is in Monochrome (Figure )
    EPILOGUE LISTER’S PORTRAIT AND THE TRAGEDY OF BURWELL PARK The reader may note that the main (and only) portrait of Martin Lister in this book is in monochrome (Figure ). When I began this work, I believed optimistically that a lovely full-colored visage would be trivial to find. Surely, such an eminent Royal physician, officer of the Royal Society, alumnus of Cambridge and Oxford, and major donor to the Ashmolean Museum would have had several images painted or engraved. After all, there were numerous portraits of his parents, his mother’s being part of the Tate Collection.1 Lister’s daughters were also artists, so it was not altogether unreasonable to expect that they had subjected their father to a sitting. I was wrong. Paraphrasing George Bernard Shaw: “The reasonable woman adapts herself to the world: the unreasonable woman persists in trying to adapt the world to herself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreason- able woman,” I decided I had better make some progress.2 Three years of queries around the world passed without any solid leads, the only image available a damaged and fuzzy reproduction that was circulating on Wikipedia without attribution. After weeks of searching, I tracked down the Wikipedia image to a black-and-white photograph in the archives of the Natural History Museum in London, but, frustratingly, the photo had no provenance. John Parker and Basil Harley had to use the same unsatisfactory illustration for their groundbreaking transla- tion of Lister’s English Spiders. I came slowly to the conclusion that perhaps that would be my fate as well.
    [Show full text]
  • “Refer to Folio and Number:” Encyclopedias, the Exchange
    Margócsy, Refer to Folio 1 “Refer to folio and number:” Encyclopedias, the Exchange of Curiosities and Practices of Identification before Linnaeus Dániel Margócsy Harvard University Imagine you are a natural historian in St Petersburg in the 1730s. You are fascinated with botany and hope to enrich your garden with some exotic plants from the British Isles. You write to your acquaintances in London to send you some seeds, especially from the species named ... Well, yes, what is that species called? And even if you know its name, would your English correspondent call that British plant the same name? Or would he think that the name refers to another species? How can you make sure that you will receive the plant you were thinking of? In the period before the widespread acceptance of Linnaeus' binomial system, how do you establish a common system of communication that could ensure that your private identifications of plants are understood by your correspondents all around Europe? Johann Amman faced exactly these difficulties as professor of botany and natural history at the St Petersburg Academy of Sciences. The Swiss natural historian came to Russia in 1733 at the bright age of 26. He trained in Leiden during the 1720s and then worked in London for a few years as curatorial assistant in the collection of Hans Sloane, which was later to become the British Museum. Once he moved to Petersburg, Amman was responsible for the upkeep of the Academy's botanical garden. As part of the job, it was necessary that he actively participate in the international exchange of seeds and plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Ashmolean Monumental Latin Inscriptions
    18-Sep-17 Ashmolean Monumental Latin Inscriptions Acknowledgements Marta Adsarias (Universiteit van Amsterdam, Universiteitsbibliotheek, Bibliotheek Bijzondere Collecties); Benjamin Altshuler (CSAD); Abigail Baker (ASHLI); Alex Croom (Arbeia Museum); Hannah Cornwell (ASHLI); Charles Crowther (CSAD); Judith Curthoys (Christ Church, Oxford); Harriet Fisher (Corpus Christi College, Oxford); Suzanne Frey- Kupper (Warwick); Jenny Hall (Museum of London); Helen Hovey (Ashmolean Museum); Jane Masséglia (ASHLI); Lorenzo Miletti (University of Naples "Federico II"); Alessandro Moro (Biblioteca Nazionale Marciana, Venice); Ilaria Perzia (Ashmolean Museum); Stefania Peterlini (BSR); Angela Pinto (Biblioteca Nazionale "Vittorio Emanuele III" - Laboratorio fotografico digitale); Philomen Probert (Oxford); Jörg Prüfert (Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin - Preußischer Kulturbesitz: Dept. of Conservation and Digitization); Nicholas Purcell (Brasenose College, Oxford); Paul Roberts (Ashmolean Museum); Maggy Sasanow (CSAD); Valerie Scott (BSR); Margareta Steinby (Helsinki/ Oxford); Will Stenhouse (Yeshiva University); Bryan Sitch (Manchester Museum); Conor Trainor (Warwick); Michael Vickers (Ashmolean Museum); Susan Walker (Ashmolean Museum); John Wilkes (Oxford) 1 18-Sep-17 Epigraphic conventions Abbreviations: a(bc) = An abbreviated word, which the editor has written out in full. a(---) = An abbreviated word, which cannot be completed. a(bc-) = An abbreviated word, which the editor has written out in full, but only the stem of the word is evident. Damage suffered
    [Show full text]
  • Ashmolean Papers Ashmolean Papers
    ASHMOLEAN PAPERS ASHMOLEAN PAPERS 2017 1 Preface 2 Introduction: Obsolescence and Industrial Culture Tim Strangleman 10 Topographies of the Obsolete: Exploring the Site Specific and Associated Histories of Post Industry Neil Brownsword and Anne Helen Mydland 18 Deindustrialisation and Heritage in Three Crockery Capitals Maris Gillette 50 Industrial Ruination and Shared Experiences: A Brief Encounter with Stoke-on-Trent Alice Mah 58 Maintenance, Ruination and the Urban Landscape of Stoke-on-Trent Tim Edensor 72 Image Management Systems: A Model for Archiving Stoke-on-Trent’s Post-Industrial Heritage Jake Kaner 82 Margins, Wastes and the Urban Imaginary Malcolm Miles 98 Biographies Topographies of the Obsolete: Ashmolean Papers Preface First published by Topographies of the Obsolete Publications 2017. ISBN 978-82-690937 In The Natural History of Staffordshire,1 Dr Robert Plot, the first keeper of the Unless otherwise specified the Copyright © for text and artwork: Ashmolean Museum describes an early account of the county’s pre-industrial Tim Strangleman, Neil Brownsword, Anne Helen Mydland, Maris Gillette, Alice Mah, pottery manufacturing during the late 17th century. Apart from documenting Tim Edensor, Jake Kaner, Malcolm Miles potters practices and processes, Plot details the regions natural clays that were once fundamental to its rise as a world renowned industrial centre for ceramics. Edited by Neil Brownsword and Anne Helen Mydland Designed by Phil Rawle, Wren Park Creative Consultants, UK Yet in recent decades the factories and communities of labour that developed Printed by The Printing House, UK around these natural resources have been subject to significant transition. Global economics have resulted in much of the regions ceramic industry outsourcing Designed and published in Stoke-on-Trent to low-cost overseas production.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Lister (1639 a Speculum of Chymical Practice: Isaac Newton
    View metadata, citation and similarDownloaded papers at from core.ac.uk rsnr.royalsocietypublishing.org on March 15, 2013 brought to you by CORE provided by University of Lincoln Institutional Repository A speculum of chymical practice: Isaac Newton, Martin Lister (1639 −1712), and the making of telescopic mirrors Anna Marie Roos Notes Rec. R. Soc. published online December 16, 2009 P<P Published online December 16, 2009 in advance of the print journal. Subject collections Articles on similar topics can be found in the following collections history of astronomy (3 articles) history of chemistry (8 articles) history of science archives (4 articles) seventeenth century science (19 articles) Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article - sign up Email alerting service in the box at the top right-hand corner of the article or click here Advance online articles have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet appeared in the paper journal (edited, typeset versions may be posted when available prior to final publication). Advance online articles are citable and establish publication priority; they are indexed by PubMed from initial publication. Citations to Advance online articles must include the digital object identifier (DOIs) and date of initial publication. To subscribe to Notes Rec. R. Soc. go to: http://rsnr.royalsocietypublishing.org/subscriptions Downloaded from rsnr.royalsocietypublishing.org on March 15, 2013 Notes Rec. R. Soc. doi:10.1098/rsnr.2009.0067 Published online A SPECULUM OF CHYMICAL PRACTICE: ISAAC NEWTON, MARTIN LISTER (1639–1712), AND THE MAKING OF TELESCOPIC MIRRORS by ANNA MARIE ROOS* Modern History Faculty, University of Oxford, Old Boys’ High School, George Street, Oxford OX1 2RL, UK In 1674 the natural philosopher and physician Martin Lister published a new method of making glass of antimony for telescopic mirrors, using Derbyshire cawk or barite as a flux.
    [Show full text]
  • 05. the Earliest Published Records of Coprolites
    Hunt et al., eds., 2012, Vertebrate Coprolites. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science, Bulletin 57. 25 THE EARLIEST PUBLISHED RECORDS OF COPROLITES CHRISTOPHER J. DUFFIN1,2 1 Scientific Associate, Department of Palaeontology, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, U.K.; 2 146, Church Hill Road, Sutton, Surrey SM3 8NF, U.K., email: [email protected] Abstract—The earliest published records of coprolites appear to date from the late 17th and early 18th centuries. Edward Lhwyd, who succeeded Robert Plot as Keeper of the Ashmolean Museum in Oxford, figured and cited what appears to be a spiral coprolite, probably from the Jurassic Corallian Group (Oxfordian) of Garford near Abingdon in his Lithophylacii Britannici Ichnographia (1699). Gottlieb Friedrich Mylius figured a specimen from the Permian Kupferschiefer of Eisleben in Saxony in his Memorabilium Saxoniæ Subterraeæ (1709). Brief bio- graphical details are given for these two authors. William Buckland seems to have been unaware of these reports as he included no mention of them in his various papers on coprolites in the 1820’s and 1830’s. EDWARD LHWYD scribing to 10 copies each. The total print run of 120 copies meant that the author received 20 books himself. As a consequence, Lhwyd’s The period prior to the identification of coprolites as fossil feces Lithophylacii Britannici Ichnographia (“British Figured Stones;” Fig. 1) by William Buckland in 1829, although not entirely fallow, contained was eventually published in February 1699, and the subscribers ensured patchy records of these structures at best (Duffin, 2009). The first that the volume was distributed extensively both at home and on the written report, accompanied by a figure, of a vertebrate coprolite ap- continent (and even, by the end of the following century, to the USA; pears to be that given by Edward Lhwyd (1660-1709).
    [Show full text]
  • Ashmolean Museum from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Ashmolean Museum From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The Ashmolean Museum (in full the Ashmolean Museum of Art and Archaeology) on Beaumont Street, Oxford, Ashmolean Museum England, is the world's first university museum.[1] Its first building was erected in 1678–1683 to house the cabinet of curiosities that Elias Ashmole gave to the University of Oxford in 1677. The museum reopened in 2009 after a major redevelopment. In November 2011, new galleries focusing on Egypt and Nubia were also unveiled. In May 2016, the museum opened new galleries of 19th-century art. Contents Main Museum Entrance 1 History 2 Renovation 3 Collections 4 Collections gallery 5 Broadway Museum and Art Gallery 6 Major exhibitions 7 Keepers and Directors Location in Oxford 8 In popular culture 8.1 Comics Established 1683 8.2 Literature Location Beaumont Street, Oxford, England 8.3 Stage productions Coordinates 51.7554°N 1.2600°W 8.4 Television 9 Theft Type University Museum of Art and 10 See also Archaeology 11 References 12 External links Director Dr Alexander Sturgis Website www.ashmolean.org History The collection includes that of Elias Ashmole, which he had collected himself, including objects he had acquired from the gardeners, travelers, and collectors John Tradescant the elder and his son, John Tradescant the younger. The collection included antique coins, books, engravings, geological specimens, and zoological specimens—one of which was the stuffed body of the last dodo ever seen in Europe; but by 1755 the stuffed dodo was so moth-eaten that it was destroyed, except for its head and one claw.
    [Show full text]
  • 2,400 Years of Malacology
    Version 1.0 – June 16, 2004 2,400 Years of Malacology Eugene V. Coan1 Alan R. Kabat2 Richard E. Petit3 ABSTRACT This paper provides a comprehensive catalog of biographical and bibliographical publications for over 5,000 malacologists, conchologists, paleontologists, and others with an interest in mollusks, from Aristotle to the present. For each person, the birth/death years and nationality are given (when known), followed by bibliographic citations to the literature about that person and his/her collections and publications. Appendices provide citations to (1) publications on oceanographic expeditions that resulted in the collection and description of mollusks; (2) histories of malacological institutions and organizations; and (3) histories and dates of publication of malacological journals and journals that are frequently cited in malacological publications, such as those of the Zoological Society of London. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 2 Materials and Methods 2 Narrative Guide to the Literature 4 General Publications 5 Geographical / Country Publications 7 Taxonomically Oriented Publications 12 Concluding Remarks 12 Future Plans 14 Acknowledgments 14 General References 15 Serials Indexed 22 General Bibliography 24 Appendix A: Publications on Expeditions 586 Appendix B: General Histories of Malacological Institutions and Societies 602 Appendix C: Information about Malacological Serials 610 1. [email protected] 2. [email protected] 3. [email protected] 1 INTRODUCTION Who was X? How can I find out more about X’s life, interests in mollusks, collections, and publications? Every generation of malacologists has been faced with this perennial problem, whether out of curiosity, or driven by a need to solve a problem relating to some aspect of molluscan taxonomy, systematics, or a wide range of other research and collection management issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Artistry of the Lister Sisters Beth Fowkes Tobin Applauds a Book on a Gifted Family of Early-Modern Naturalists
    COMMENT BOOKS & ARTS attention of the national Counter- superpowers purportedly lurking in every- Hubbard’s gift for the hard sell was intelligence Corps, which suspected a leak one — once they had gone through an pivotal, and Nevala-Lee’s portrait of him as from the Manhattan Project; swathes of ‘auditing’ process and emerged as ‘clears’ — a paranoid narcissist and skilled manipula- the personnel at the project’s site in Los gripped Campbell, and he helped Hubbard tor is scathing. However, Campbell is also Alamos, New Mexico, were science-fiction to market his 1950 book Dianetics. Nevala- sharply scrutinized for his role in midwifing fans. Campbell was aggressively and unleashing Dianetics. Heinlein interviewed by an intelligence agent, and Asimov were repelled by what Cartmill’s personal correspondence they saw as an uncritical embrace of was put under surveillance, and quackery, and took refuge in newer, Astounding came close to having its often more lucrative markets. The mailing privileges revoked. After book’s final chapters detail the steady the war, Campbell often cited the decline of the magazine into a second- incident to demonstrate the genre’s rank publication, and Campbell (who prophetic nature — its capacity to died in 1971) into a reactionary crack- project a convincing fictional future pot with racist views. from known scientific facts. Although much of the story out- Indeed, the unprecedented tech- lined in Astounding has been told nological advances of the war fuelled before, in genre histories and biogra- ARCHIVE/ALAMY PICTURE GRANGER HISTORICAL the public taste for science and tech- phies of and memoirs by the princi- nology, in turn raising the cultural pals, Nevala-Lee does an excellent job status of science fiction.
    [Show full text]