DOCSLIB.ORG

Massive Seed Predation of Pseudobombax Grandiflorum (Bombacaceae) by Parakeets Brotogeris Versicolurus (Psittacidae) in a Forest Fragment in Brazil’

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Massive Seed Predation of Pseudobombax Grandiflorum (Bombacaceae) by Parakeets Brotogeris Versicolurus (Psittacidae) in a Forest Fragment in Brazil’ Notes 613 BlOTROPlCA 34(4): 613-615 2002 Massive Seed Predation of Pseudobombax grandiflorum (Bombacaceae) by Parakeets Brotogeris versicolurus (Psittacidae) in a Forest Fragment in Brazil’ ABSTRACT Here we report massive seed predation of Pseudobombax grandzfirum (Bombacaceae) by Botogeris versicolurus (Psitta- cidae) in a forest fragment in Brazil. The intensity of seed predation was very high when compared to other studies in continuous forest, perhaps resulting from a scarcity of resources in such areas. This scarcity may limit the range of parrot’s diet to a few plant species. It suggests that studies of Psittacidae seed predation may be important for con- servation of some plants in fragments. Kq word: Atlantic Forest; Brazil; Brotogeris versicolurus; firest papentation; Pseudobombax grandiflorum; Psitta- riake; seed preaktion. A SUBSTANTIAL PORTION OF SEED CROP is lost to predators in every fruiting event Uanzen 1972, 1981; Howe 1980; Schupp 1988) and because of this extensive mortality, seed predation is one of the major ecological and evolutionary forces affecting individual plants, populations, and communities (Schupp 1988). Psittacids (parrots, macaws, and parakeets) have been recognized as important pre-dispersal seed predators in the Neotropics Uanzen 1972, Higgins 1979, Howe 1980, Janzen 1981, Galetti & Rodrigues 1992, Coates-Estrada et al. 1993). The diet of most species consists of fruits, seeds, and flowers, which are taken in treetops or on the ground (Forshaw 1981, Roth 1984, Galetti 1993); however, despite their potential impacts on plant recruitment, very few data are available on the intensity of seed predation by parrots, especially in fragmented forests (Higgins 1979, Galetti & Rodrigues 1992). The Canary-winged Parakeet Brotogeris uersicolurw is a small, long-tailed psittacid that is widely distributed in South America. It inhabits cerrado, gallery forests, parts of the Atlantic forest (Sick 1997), and disturbed areas (Paranhos 1995) in eastern and southern Brazil from Cead, Maranh50, southern Par& to south Rio de Janeiro, western S~OPaulo, Mato Grosso, and northern and eastern Bolivia, Paraguay, and northern Argentina (Forshaw 1981). It is a generalist species and its diet is composed of a wide variety of pulp, seeds, flowers, and some insects. Paranhos (1995) observed Canary-winged Par- akeets feeding on different items of 45 plant species from 16 families. Bombacaceae plants are common items in the diets of most Brazilian psittacids. Brotogeris uersicolurus has been observed consuming seeds and flowers of Chorisia speciosa and Psdbombax sp. (Paranhos 1995). Brotogeris tirica and Qrrhura fiontalis consume seeds of Spirotheca passrfiroides and flowers of Psdbombax sp. (Galetti 1997). Brotogeris chrysopterw are known to eat fruits of Bombax spp. and flowers of Erioteca globosa (Roth 1984). Pionus mavimiliani has been observed consuming flowers of C. speciosa and Pseudobombax grandzfirum (Galetti 1993). Pseudobombax grandfirum (Bombacaceae) is a semi-deciduous tree 15-25 m in height that occurs in the Atlantic Forest from Rio de Janeiro, Minas Gerais to S5o Paulo, Mato Grosso do Sul. The fruit of I? grandzfirum is a dehiscent “pod.” Mature pods are found from September to October and the seeds, covered with cotton, are typically wind-dispersed (Lorenzi 1998). Here we report a massive seed predation of I? grandfirum by the Canary-winged Parakeet in a small forest fragment in southeast Brazil. The observations were carried out in a 9.5 ha semideciduous forest fragment located near S5o Carlos, southeast Brazil (21”55’S, 47”55’W). This area is surrounded by pasture and the region is completely disturbed, with the few remaining small patches of cerrado or semi- deciduous forest surrounded by pasture or sugarcane. Sixty hours of focal observations were performed on five l? grandfirurn from 0600 to 1800 h during 6 to 26 September 2000. Everytime that we observed a parakeet visiting the plant, we recorded the time Received 24 May 2001; revision accepted 7 August 2002. 614 Francisco, Lunardi, and Galetti of the visit, group size, the time spent by parakeets foraging on seeds, and the number of seeds preyed upon by parakeets (Galetti 2002). Bird activities could be observed accurately from observation points because plants lose their leaves in the fruiting period. We estimated the number of seeds by counting the number of fruits and multiplying the mean number of seeds in each fruit calculated from a sample of nine fruits. The I? grandzyorum trees produced 8-146 fruits (2= 67.2 ? 54.87, N = 5). The fruits were 23.66 2 2.29 cm in length (N = 6) and 37.75 ? 4.92 mm in width (N = 6). These fruits contained an average of 171.55 ? 74.70 seeds (N = 9). Therefore, the estimated number of seeds per plant was 11,528 ? 9,412 (N = 5). The seeds of I? grandrflorum were 6.45 t 0.22 rnm in length (N = 20), 5.54 ? 0.30 mm in width (N= 20), and weighed 0.097 t 0.009 g (N= 20). In 60 hours of focal observations on five different plants, we recorded 157 bird visits by parakeets, with an average of 2.61 ? 4.07 visits/hour (N = 60). The birds visited the plants alone or in flocks of up to 11 individuals (2 = 2.81 2 1.93, N = 58). The time spent foraging on plants varied from 20 seconds to 42 minutes 38 seconds (2 = 615.73 ? 771.04 sec, N = 23). Parakeets opened the fruits with their beaks, tearing away pieces of the wall and exposing the seeds for consumption. Only immature fruits were consumed and we did not observe birds dropping entire seeds while feeding. The number of visits on each plant was marginally correlated with the number of pods in the trees (Spearman’s rank correlation test: r, = 0.90, P = 0.083, N = 5). The average number of visits per plant per day was 31.4 t 25.44 (N = 5) and the birds consumed an average of 8.40 t 10.46 seeds/visit (N = 27). Thus, we estimated that parakeets consumed 263.76 seeds/plant/day, which represented 2.29 percent of the total fruit crop. Therefore, parakeets could have consumed the entire fruit crop in 43.7 days. Although we do not know exactly when parakeets started to consume seeds, opened pods remained on branches, and at the end of this study, we did not find any available seeds on pods in the five I? grandzyorum observed. Predation occurred while fruits were still unripe and no dehiscent pods were observed under sampled trees. Thus, we assumed that 100 percent of the seeds were removed. This reflects a high impact of this psittacid in a wind-dispersed tree. Abiotic seed dispersal fruits are impacted heavily by seed predation from vertebrates (especially psittacids and monkeys) in semi-deciduous forest fragments (Galetti & Rodrigues 1992, Galetti & Pedroni 1994). The intensity of seed predation on I? grandiJ9orum by B. versicolurus was very high when compared to our studies on parrot seed predation (Galetti & Rodrigues 1992). It seems that fruits in forest fragments have higher seed predation by psittacids than in continuous forests. For example, the intensity of seed predation by Amazona farinosa and A. autumnalis on Tetragastris panamensis (Burseraceae) was estimated to be 6.4 percent of the seed crop in Panama (Howe 1980). Pionus mestruus consumed ca 8 percent of the fruit crop of Albizia sp. in Brazilian Amazonia, while in forest fragments, I! mavimiliani destroyed 20 percent of the fruit crop of Inga spp. (Galetti & Rodrigues 1992) and other parrots consumed 10 percent of the fruit crop of Sterculia apetala (Janzen 1972). The high rate of seed predation by parrots in small forest fragments may represent the scarcity of resources in such areas, limiting the range of the parrots’ diet to very few plant species (Galetti & Rodrigues 1992). For example, Bombacaceae seeds comprised only 4 percent of the diet of B. tirica in a continuous Atlantic forest (Galetti 1997). Several psittacid species, such as Brotogeris spp. and Aratinga leucophtalmus, are positively affected by deforestation, increasing their densities in agricultural areas (MG, pers. obs.); however, all these species fed upon seeds in both the agricultural crops and native forested species found in the adjacent fragments (Galetti 1993). Our study showed that seed predation by parakeets may have a high impact on seed dispersal that will ultimately affect plant recruitment in such fragmented areas. Previous studies have reported much higher seed predation by rodents in small fragments and edges in larger forests and interior (Santos & Telleria 1994, 1997; Jules & Rathcke 1999). Studies on pre-dispersal seed predation by vertebrates, however, are scarce. The high consumption of I? grandzyorum seeds by parakeets seems to dramatically affect the demog- raphy of this wind-dispersed tree, suggesting that studies about Psittacidae seed predation may be of hndamental importance for the conservation of some plant species in fragmented habitats. We are grateful to C. R. Francisco for permission to work in the study area. M. R. Francisco was Notes 615 supported by CAPES, V. 0. Lunardi by CAPES and PIBIC/CNPq, and M. Galetti by FAPESP and CNPq. We also thank D. Garcia and an anonymous reviewer for their comments on the manuscript. COATES-ESTWA,R., A. ESTRADA,AND D. MERIT JR. 1993. Foraging by parrots (Amuwnu uutumnafir) on fruits of Stemmudeniu donnefhnithii (Apocinaceae) in the tropical rain forest of Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. J. Trop. Ecol. 9: 121-124. FORSHAW,J. M. 1981. Parrots of the world. London, David & Charles, Brunel House, Newton Abbot, Devon, England. GALETTI,M. 1993. Diet of the Scaly-headed Parrot (Pionus muximifiunz) in a semideciduous forest in southeastern Brazil. Biotropica 25: 419425. 1997. Seasonal abundance and feeding ecology of parrots and parakeets in a lowland Atlantic forest of Brazil. Ararajuba 5: 115-126. 2002.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Volume 2. Animals
    AC20 Doc. 8.5 Annex (English only/Seulement en anglais/Únicamente en inglés) REVIEW OF SIGNIFICANT TRADE ANALYSIS OF TRADE TRENDS WITH NOTES ON THE CONSERVATION STATUS OF SELECTED SPECIES Volume 2. Animals Prepared for the CITES Animals Committee, CITES Secretariat by the United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre JANUARY 2004 AC20 Doc. 8.5 – p. 3 Prepared and produced by: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK UNEP WORLD CONSERVATION MONITORING CENTRE (UNEP-WCMC) www.unep-wcmc.org The UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre is the biodiversity assessment and policy implementation arm of the United Nations Environment Programme, the world’s foremost intergovernmental environmental organisation. UNEP-WCMC aims to help decision-makers recognise the value of biodiversity to people everywhere, and to apply this knowledge to all that they do. The Centre’s challenge is to transform complex data into policy-relevant information, to build tools and systems for analysis and integration, and to support the needs of nations and the international community as they engage in joint programmes of action. UNEP-WCMC provides objective, scientifically rigorous products and services that include ecosystem assessments, support for implementation of environmental agreements, regional and global biodiversity information, research on threats and impacts, and development of future scenarios for the living world. Prepared for: The CITES Secretariat, Geneva A contribution to UNEP - The United Nations Environment Programme Printed by: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 0DL, UK © Copyright: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre/CITES Secretariat The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP or contributory organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • Brotogeris Jugularis) in Costa Rica
    October 1981] Short Communications 841 appreciable residuesof pollutants may be present. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) have been found on the surface of polystyrene spherules, apparently absorbed from seawater, in a concentration of five parts per million (Carpenter et al. 1972), and it may be assumedthat organochlorinesare associatedwith other oceanic plastic items. Measurable residuesof DDT, DDE, and PCBs were detected in visceral fat from Black-footed and Laysan albatross on Midway (Fisher 1973). Although the origin of such ingested pol- lutants may be in the North Pacific food chain, it may also be associated with plastics ingested by albatross. Our stay on Midway Islands was supported by a National Science Foundation Grant (PCM 12351- A01) administeredby Dr. G. C. Whittow. We are grateful to CDR Kuhneman, Commanding Officer, for assistanceduring our stay at the U.S. Naval Air Facility, Midway Island. Special thanks to ENS Immel and the base game warden staff for invaluable aid and transportation to Eastern Island. We thank Elizabeth Flint, Department of Biology, U.C.L.A., for collecting fresh castingson French Frigate Shoals and G. H. Balazs for the use of unpublished data. We also thank Craig Harrison for his critical review of the manuscript. LITERATUIIE CITED CAIIPENTEII, E. J., S. J. ANDEIISON, G. R. HAlIVEY, H. P. MIKLAS, & B. B. PECK. 1972. Polystyrene spherules in coastal waters. Science 178: 749-750. DAY, R. H. 1980. The occurrence and characteristics of plastic pollution in Alaska's marine birds. Unpublished M.S. thesis, College, Alaska, Univ. Alaska. FISHEli, H. [. 1973. Pollutants in North Pacific albatrosses.Pacific Sci. 27; 220-225.
    [Show full text]
  • Exotic Birds in the New York City Area
    EXOTIC BIRDS IN THE NEW YORK CITY AREA JOHN BULL PART I In addition to the Ring-necked Pheasant (Phasianus colchicus), Rock Dove (Columba Zivia), Common Starling (Stumns vulgaris), and the House Sparrow (Passer domesticus), which were initially introduced into North America in the New York City region during the latter half of the nineteenth century, the Mute Swan (Cygnus odor) was also first imported here, though not until much later, in the second decade of this century. Unlike those widespread species, it is essentially restricted to the northeastern states, mainly within 100 miles of New York City. Within the past decade, waterfowl (11 species), parrots (11 species), and finches (sensu late) , i.e., Ploceidae, Estrildidae, and Fringillidae (12 species), lead the list of foreign introduced species that have managed to escape from time to time, but nearly all have failed to establish themselves. Of all the exotic, introduced species it is the family Psittacidae (parrots) which have made the headlines in recent years. Certain members of this well-known tropical group have been commonly imported and have escaped into the greater New York area, and one species appears to have become established. Within the past dozen years or so, members of the parrot family have been imported into the United States in tremendous numbers from many parts of the world. This has been made possible through the development of specific antibiotics in the treatment of psittacosis or “parrot fever”-more properly ornithosis or “bird fever,” as chickens, pigeons, and other kinds of birds are as much carriers of this contagious disease as are parrots.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Parrots 3 Other Major Groups of Parrots 16
    ONE What are the Parrots and Where Did They Come From? The Evolutionary History of the Parrots CONTENTS The Marvelous Diversity of Parrots 3 Other Major Groups of Parrots 16 Reconstructing Evolutionary History 5 Box 1. Ancient DNA Reveals the Evolutionary Relationships of the Fossils, Bones, and Genes 5 Carolina Parakeet 19 The Evolution of Parrots 8 How and When the Parrots Diversified 25 Parrots’ Ancestors and Closest Some Parrot Enigmas 29 Relatives 8 What Is a Budgerigar? 29 The Most Primitive Parrot 13 How Have Different Body Shapes Evolved in The Most Basal Clade of Parrots 15 the Parrots? 32 THE MARVELOUS DIVERSITY OF PARROTS The parrots are one of the most marvelously diverse groups of birds in the world. They daz- zle the beholder with every color in the rainbow (figure 3). They range in size from tiny pygmy parrots weighing just over 10 grams to giant macaws weighing over a kilogram. They consume a wide variety of foods, including fruit, seeds, nectar, insects, and in a few cases, flesh. They produce large repertoires of sounds, ranging from grating squawks to cheery whistles to, more rarely, long melodious songs. They inhabit a broad array of habitats, from lowland tropical rainforest to high-altitude tundra to desert scrubland to urban jungle. They range over every continent but Antarctica, and inhabit some of the most far-flung islands on the planet. They include some of the most endangered species on Earth and some of the most rapidly expanding and aggressive invaders of human-altered landscapes. Increasingly, research into the lives of wild parrots is revealing that they exhibit a corresponding variety of mating systems, communication signals, social organizations, mental capacities, and life spans.
    [Show full text]
  • What Eats Parrots?
    Bird Talk Magazine, August 2002 Donald Brightsmith What Eats Parrots? What are the major predators on parrots in the wild? By Donald Brightsmith Originally published in Bird Talk Magazine August 2002 Recently I was asked what animals prey on parrots in the wild. I guess the short answer to that is . not much. In general parrots are quite wary and do a number of things to make sure that they are not captured by predators. They usually feed in groups high in the tree canopies. The high perches and large groups ensures that there are many eyes to spot predators and then an easy escape as they drop from the tall trees. Parrot nests also seem to be chosen to reduce the risk of predation. Most species in predator rich environments, especially the macaws I work with, prefer to nest in high trees in relatively exposed spots from which the adults can watch for danger and take flight quickly if needed. Those species that nest in the forest understory where they are more vulnerable take great precautions to avoid being captured when they return to their nests. I have watched three such species in the wild as they approach their nests, the Cobalt-winged Parakeet, Tui Parakeet and the Gray-cheeked Parakeet. All three of these birds are normally loud and raucous (those who own them as pets will back me up on this one I am sure). They call constantly when in flight, and usually even continue to chatter while feeding. But when they return to their nests it is a very different matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Broken Screens: the Regulation of Live Animal Imports in the United States
    Broken Screen S The Regulation of Live Animal Imports in the United States DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE Defenders of Wildlife is a national, nonprofit membership organization dedicated to the protection of all native wild animals and plants in their natural communities. PROJECT CONTRIBUTORS The Consortium for Conservation Medicine (CCM) is a collaborative institution linking Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Tufts University School of Veterinary Medicine Center for Conservation Medicine, The University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, the University of Wisconsin-Madison Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, the U.S. Geological Society National Wildlife Health Center and the Wildlife Trust. CCM strives to understand the links among human changes to the environment, the health of all species including humans, and the conservation of biodiversity. www.conservationmedicine.org The Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) is part of the Species Survival Commission of The World Conservation Union (IUCN). The ISSG consist of about 150 scientific and policy experts on invasive species from more than 40 countries. The ISSG aims to reduce threats to natural ecosystems and the native species they contain by increasing awareness of invasive alien species, and of ways to prevent, control or eradicate them. www.issg.org ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Defenders of Wildlife Principal Author: Peter T. Jenkins Co-authors: Kristen Genovese, Heidi Ruffler Additional assistance: Carroll Muffett, Stas Burgiel, Kelly Malsch, Timm Kroeger, Mark Cheater, Robert Irvin and Gabriela Chavarria Researcher: David Tucker Editor: Kate Davies Art Director: Jen Lee Consortium for Conservation Medicine Principal Contributor: Katherine F. Smith Additional assistance: Peter Daszak and Lisa Schloegel IUCN Invasive Species Specialist Group Principal Contributor: Michael Browne Additional assistance: Shyama Pagad, UniServices Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Escapes!! the Canary-Winged Parakeet in the US
    Bird Talk Magazine, May 2000 Donald Brightsmith Escapes!! The Canary-winged Parakeet in the US By Donald Brightsmith Originally published in Bird Talk Magazine May 2000 As I inched along through the afternoon traffic down the shady streets of the Coral Gables section of Miami I heard the characteristic chattering of a small group of parakeets. I swerved rapidly into a side street, parked, grabbed my binoculars and dove into the suburban jungle to look for the birds. There in the top of a tall fig tree near the edge of the University of Miami campus was a flock of Canary- winged Parakeets (Yellow-chevroned Parakeets). For me these were not just any parakeets, but the reason why I had made the 16-hour drive from North Carolina. It was late May 1996 and I had just agreed to write the Birds of North America Species account on the Canary-winged Parakeet for the American Ornithologists’ Union as part of their effort to summarize what is known about every species that occurs in North America, native or introduced. In this column I will share with you some of my findings and adventures that resulted from my attempts to summarize what is known about Canary-winged Parakeets. As I began my work I quickly realized that there were two very different types of birds lumped in the species I knew as “Canary-winged Parakeet.” First there is the White-winged Parakeet, an olive-green bird with a yellow band on the upper surface of the wing and white wing feathers that form a huge white wing patch when the bird flies.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Office of Endangered Species U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service United
    In the Office of Endangered Species U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service United States Department of Interior Photo: iStockPhoto A Petition to List 14 Species of Foreign Parrots, Macaws, & Cockatoos as Threatened or Endangered Under the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531 et seq. January 29, 2008 Petitioner: Friends of Animals, 777 Post Road, Suite 205, Darien, Connecticut 06820 Petition Prepared by: Jamie Cotter, Matthew Willson, Kay Bond, Esq., & Lee Hall, Esq. Table of Contents I. Introduction…………………………………………………………………..1 II. The ESA Listing Process…………………………………………………….2 A. ESA’s Listing Requirements…………………………………………….2 B. Listing Decision Basis………………………………………....................2 III. BirdLife International, NatureServe, and the IUCN Red List……………3 A. BirdLife International………………………………………...................3 B. NatureServe………………………………………………………………4 C. IUCN Red List……………………………………………………………4 IV. Species Accounts……………………………………………………………..6 A. Blue-throated macaws (Ara glaucogularis)…………………………….6 1. Description……………………………………………………...6 2. Distribution and Range……………………………..................6 3. Life History……………………………………………………..6 4. Abundance and Trend…………………………………………7 5. Threats………………………………………………………….7 B. Blue-headed macaws (Propyrrhura couloni)…………………………....9 1. Description……………………………………………………...9 2. Distribution and Range……………………………..................9 3. Life History……………………………………………………..9 4. Abundance and Trend………………………………………..10 5. Threats………………………………………………………...10 C. Crimson shining parrots……………………………………………….11 1. Description…………………………………………………….11
    [Show full text]
  • Survival on the Ark: Life-History Trends in Captive Parrots A
    Animal Conservation. Print ISSN 1367-9430 Survival on the ark: life-history trends in captive parrots A. M. Young1, E. A. Hobson1, L. Bingaman Lackey2 & T. F. Wright1 1 Department of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, USA 2 International Species Information System, Eagan, MN, USA Keywords Abstract captive breeding; ISIS; life-history; lifespan; parrot; Psittaciformes. Members of the order Psittaciformes (parrots and cockatoos) are among the most long-lived and endangered avian species. Comprehensive data on lifespan and Correspondence breeding are critical to setting conservation priorities, parameterizing population Anna M. Young, Department of Biology, viability models, and managing captive and wild populations. To meet these needs, MSC 3AF, New Mexico State University, we analyzed 83 212 life-history records of captive birds from the International Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA Species Information System (ISIS) and calculated lifespan and breeding para- Tel: +1 575 646 4863; meters for 260 species of parrots (71% of extant species). Species varied widely in Fax: +1 575 646 5665 lifespan, with larger species generally living longer than smaller ones. The highest Email: [email protected] maximum lifespan recorded was 92 years in Cacatua moluccensis, but only 11 other species had a maximum lifespan over 50 years. Our data indicate that while some Editor: Iain Gordon captive individuals are capable of reaching extraordinary ages, median lifespans Associate Editor: Iain Gordon are generally shorter than widely assumed, albeit with some increase seen in birds presently held in zoos. Species that lived longer and bred later in life tended to be Received 18 January 2011; accepted 13 June more threatened according to IUCN classifications.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Birds of South America
    TRAFFIC Bird’s-eye view: REPORT Lessons from 50 years of bird trade regulation & conservation in Amazon countries DECEMBER 2018 Bernardo Ortiz-von Halle About the author and this study: Bernardo Ortiz-von Halle, a biologist and TRAFFIC REPORT zoologist from the Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia, has more than 30 years of experience in numerous aspects of conservation and its links to development. His decades of work for IUCN - International Union for Conservation of Nature and TRAFFIC TRAFFIC, the wildlife trade monitoring in South America have allowed him to network, is a leading non-governmental organization working globally on trade acquire a unique outlook on the mechanisms, in wild animals and plants in the context institutions, stakeholders and challenges facing of both biodiversity conservation and the conservation and sustainable use of species sustainable development. and ecosystems. Developing a critical perspective The views of the authors expressed in this of what works and what doesn’t to achieve lasting conservation goals, publication do not necessarily reflect those Bernardo has put this expertise within an historic framework to interpret of TRAFFIC, WWF, or IUCN. the outcomes of different wildlife policies and actions in South America, Reproduction of material appearing in offering guidance towards solutions that require new ways of looking at this report requires written permission wildlife trade-related problems. Always framing analysis and interpretation from the publisher. in the midst of the socioeconomic and political frameworks of each South The designations of geographical entities in American country and in the region as a whole, this work puts forward this publication, and the presentation of the conclusions and possible solutions to bird trade-related issues that are material, do not imply the expression of any linked to global dynamics, especially those related to wildlife trade.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Richness, Composition and Detectability of Psittacidae (Aves) In
    Revista Chilena de Historia Natural ISSN: 0716-078X [email protected] Sociedad de Biología de Chile Chile RODRIGUES, PATRÍSIA O.; BORGES, MARIANA R.; MELO, CELINE Richness, composition and detectability of Psittacidae (Aves) in three palm swamps of the Cerrado sensu lato in central Brazil Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, vol. 85, núm. 2, 2012, pp. 171-178 Sociedad de Biología de Chile Santiago, Chile Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=369944301003 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative PSITTACIDAE IN PALM SWAMPS OF BRAZIL 171 REVISTA CHILENA DE HISTORIA NATURAL Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 85: 171-178, 2012 © Sociedad de Biología de Chile RESEARCH ARTICLE Richness, composition and detectability of Psittacidae (Aves) in three palm swamps of the Cerrado sensu lato in central Brazil Riqueza, composición y detectabilidad de los Psittacidae (Aves) en tres pantanos del Cerrado sensu lato en el Brasil central PATRÍSIA O. RODRIGUES, MARIANA R. BORGES & CELINE MELO* Laboratório de Ornitologia e Bioacústica, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Rua Ceará, s/n, Umuarama, CEP: 38400-902, Uberlândia, Brasil *Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT The objectives of this study were: (1) to investigate the richness and composition of the Psittacidae in palm swamps; (2) to determine if the sizes of fl ocks vary seasonally; (3) to compare detectability rates according to species. Psittacid communities were observed from November 2006 to November 2007 in semimonthly visits to the area using fi xed-point observation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Parakeet Brotogeris Tirica Feeds on and Disperses the Fruits of the Palm Syagrus Romanzoffiana in Southeastern Brazil
    The parakeet Brotogeris tirica feeds on and disperses the fruits of the palm Syagrus romanzoffiana in Southeastern Brazil Ivan Sazima1,2 1Departamento de Zoologia e Museu de História Natural, Universidade Estadual de Campinas – UNICAMP, CP 6109, CEP 13083-970 Campinas, SP, Brasil 2Autor para correspondência: Ivan Sazima, e-mail: [email protected],www.unicamp.br Sazima, I. The parakeet Brotogeris tirica feeds on and disperses the fruits of the palm Syagrus romanzoffiana in Southeastern Brazil. Biota Neotrop., vol. 8, no. 1, Jan./Mar. 2008. Available from: <http://www.biotaneotropica. org.br/v8n1/en/abstract?short-communication+bn01008012008>. Abstract: Small psittacids remain unrecorded as dispersal agents of palm fruits in Brazil. I record here the plain parakeet (Brotogeris tirica), an Atlantic forest endemic, feeding on and dispersing the fruits of the palm Syagrus romanzoffiana at Ubatuba, northern coast of São Paulo, Southeastern Brazil. The birds removed the fruit and carried it away from the mother-tree in about 40% of the feeding records. While perched on trees and shrubs of the understorey, the parakeets removed and ingested most of the mesocarp, dropping the partly consumed fruit. As the parakeets damaged no the embryo and may feed at a distance from the mother-tree, they act as primary dispersal agents. This is the first substantiated record of a small Neotropical psittacid as a stomatochorous dispersal agent of palm fruits the size of A. romanzoffiana drupes. Keywords: Bird-plant symbiosis, Psittacidae, Arecaceae, feeding behaviour, synzoochory. Sazima, I. O periquito Brotogeris tirica come e dispersa os frutos da palmeira Syagrus romanzoffiana no sudeste do Brasil.
    [Show full text]