DOCSLIB.ORG

The Illegal Parrot Trade in Mexico --- a Comprehensive Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Illegal Parrot Trade in Mexico --- a Comprehensive Assessment THE ILLEGAL PARROT TRADE IN MEXICO --- A COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT This is the final, unpublished, English manuscript version of this report. A fully illustrated Spanish version has been printed separately under the title: Tráfico Ilegal de Pericos en México - Una Evaluación Detallada. Both versions are available online at: www.defenders.org/mexicanparrot . Principal Investigators: Juan Carlos Cantú Guzmán, Director of Programs Defenders of Wildlife, México Office María Elena Sánchez Saldaña, President Teyeliz, A.C. Manuel Grosselet Ornithologist Jesús Silva Gamez Veterinarian © January 2007 Defenders of Wildlife, México Office Teyeliz, A.C. Bosques de Cerezos 112 Ahuehuetes Sur 811 Bosques de las Lomas Bosques de las Lomas México, D.F. 11700 México, D.F. 11700 Headquarters Office Defenders of Wildlife 1130 17th St. NW Washington, DC 20036 USA Tel: 1.202.682.9400 www.defenders.org Defenders of Wildlife is a national, nonprofit membership organization dedicated to the protection of all native wild animals and plants in their natural communities. Teyeliz is a non profit organization whose mission is the conservation of Mexican biodiversity and the combat of illegal trade in wild species. Partial funding provided by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of International Conservation, under Agreement No. 98210-5-G096. The views contained in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service or those of the Government of Mexico. Cover photo: Pericos asegurados, Profepa Guerrero 2005 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 7 1 - Introduction 9 2 - Mexican Parrot Species 12 3 - Parrot Trappers 15 4 - Capture Methods 22 5 – Normativity 24 6 - Trapping Authorizations 26 7 - Illegal Trade 34 8 - Trade Routes 40 9 – Seizures 45 10 – Mortality 60 11 - Rescue Centers 63 12 - Captive Breeding 66 13 - Pet Shops, Internet Sales, and Shows 69 14 - Prices of Mexican Parrots 71 15 – Imports 79 16 – Exports 88 17 – Discussion 89 18 - Conclusions and Recommendations 94 APPENDICES Acknowledgments 97 Bibliography 98 Alternatives for Sustainable Use of Mexican Parrots 105 Species scientific and common names 108 List of acronyms 109 Pet shops and bird breeders consulted for prices on the internet 110 Trappers and Profepa’s inspectors questionnaires 111 Parrot seizure graphs by species 112 4 LIST OF TABLES, GRAPHS AND FIGURES Page Tables Table 2.1 - Threats affecting Mexican species of parrots (according to Macias et al 2000) 12 Table 2.2 - Parrot population decrease according to trappers 13 Table 2.3 - Population decreases of Mexican parrot species 13 Table 3.1 - Registered bird trapper and salesmen unions 15 Table 3.2 - Comparison of bird trade union membership 16 Table 3.3 - Registered bird trappers and bird salesmen 16 Table 3.4 - Annual capture by typical trappers of various species 19 Table 6.1 - Parrot species authorized to be captured per season, 1979-2005 26 Table 6.2 - Number of years legally trapped, 1979-2005 27 Table 6.3 - Threat status for Mexican parrots, 1991-2006 28 Table 6.4 - Capture authorizations, 1998-2002 30 Table 6.5 - UMAs authorized or rejected for capture of parrots, 2000-2005 32 Table 7.1 - Estimate of parrots captured annually by state 35 Table 7.2 - Estimate of parrots captured annually by species 35 Table 7.3 - Comparison of Profepa’s seizures of authorized and non-authorized species 38 Table 9.1 - Parrot seizures by SEDUE, 1987-1992 45 Table 9.2 - Comparison of seizures by Profepa and SEDUE 48 Table 9.3 - Mexican and exotic specimens seized by Profepa by state, 1995-2005 48 Table 9.4 - Profepa’s seizure effectiveness, 1995-2005 50 Table 9.5 - Total parrots seized by PGR, 2001-2006 51 Table 9.6 - PGR parrot seizures by state, 2001-2006 51 Table 9.7 - Persons sentenced for illegal trade of birds, 1990-2006 51 Table 9.8 - Seized Mexican specimens per species by Profepa, 1995-2005 52 Table 9.9 - Seized species by PGR, 2001-2006 53 Table 9.10 - Estimated past annual smuggling of Mexican parrots into the USA 56 Table 9.11 - Percentage of Mexican wild-captured parrots smuggled into the USA 57 Table 9.12 - USA seizures by species, 1992-2005 58 Table 10.1 - Typical mortality of 100 wild-caught parrots during stages of illegal trade 60 Table 11.1 - Quantity of parrots admitted into government rescue centers, 1995-2005 63 Table 12.1 - Number of captive bred parrots authorized for sale, 2002-2005 66 Table 12.2 - Captive bred species authorized for sale per year, 2002-2005 67 Table 14.1 - Average USA prices of parrots, 1996-2006 71 Table 14.2 - USA bird breeders with Mexican parrots listed on the internet 72 Table 14.3 - USA prices by gender 73 Table 14.4 - USA prices of wild and captive bred pairs 73 Table 14.5 - Retail parrot prices in Mexico, 2005–2006 74 Table 14.6 - Price variation depending on distance 75 Table 14.7 - Observed and expected wild parrot prices, 1995–2006 76 Table 14.8 - Price comparison of wild-caught parrots with captive bred and imported 77 pet store prices Table 15.1 - Mexican species listed in Appendix I of CITES 79 Table 15.2 - Top 24 exotic species imported by Mexico, 1995-2005 80 Table 15.3 – Source codes of CITES Appendix I and II psittacines imported to 82 Mexico, 1995-2004 5 Page Tables (continued) Table 15.4 – Source codes of CITES Appendix I parrot species imported under purpose code (T) Commercial Trade, 1995-2005 83 Table 15.5 - Mexican native parrots imported legally into the USA, 1981-2004 84 Table 15.6 - USA imports of five Mexican native species before and after the 1993 ban 86 Table 15.7 - USA Imports of four Mexican species before and after listing in Appendix I of CITES 86 Table 17.1 - Examples of illegal trade and contraband in Mexico 90 Graphs Graph 3.1 - Authorized bird trappers per season 17 Graph 3.2 - Authorized bird salesmen per season 17 Graph 9.1 - Mexican psittacines seized by Profepa ,1995-2005 46 Graph 9.2 - Mexican psittacines seized by Profepa, 1997-2005 46 Graph 9.3 - Profepa Oaxaca seizures, 1997-2005 47 Graph 9.4 - Sentenced bird traffickers per year, 2001-2005 52 Graph 9.5 - Mexican parrot seizures by the USFWS, 1995-2005 56 Graph 10.1 - Average mortality in parrot seizures by Profepa 61 Graph 11.1 - Parrots admitted into rescue centers (CIVS), 1995-2005 64 Graph 11.2 - Comparison of total admissions vs seizures from states of Tabasco, Jalisco, Tamaulipas, DF and EdoMex 65 Graph 12.1 - Captive bred specimens authorized, 2002-2005 68 Graph 13.1 - Registry of persons that commercialize wildlife, 1998-2004 69 Graph 15.1 - Imports of parrots by Mexico 79 Graph 15.2 - Imports of parrots for commercial purposes 81 Graph 16.1 - Exports of Mexican species, 1995-2004 88 Figures Figure 8.1 - International trafficking routes 42 Figure 8.2 - Trafficking routes in Chiapas 43 Figure 8.3 - Trafficking routes in Nayarit 44 6 THE ILLEGAL PARROT TRADE IN MEXICO --- A COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT Executive Summary Mexico has 22 species of parrots (psittacines) of which six are endemic. Wild parrots are widespread across the country and have a strong connection with Mexican culture. All species except two are officially listed as at risk; 6 species are classified as endangered, 10 as threatened, and 4 as under special protection. The foremost threats psittacines face in Mexico are loss of habitat and illegal trapping for the pet trade. While some research has been done in the past regarding parrot trafficking, the fundamental questions of the volume of illegal trapping, how and where it is carried out, how trapping affects particular species and how the illegal trade relates to the legal trade were poorly understood. This assessment provides, for the first time, comprehensive answers to these and related questions, as well as detailed historical information on the regulatory programs applied to parrot trapping, the enforcement of those programs, seizures by enforcement officials, mortality rates of captured parrots, and prices in the legal and illegal trades, including historical trends. Based on interviews with trappers and representatives of their unions, and analysis of other data, an estimated range of 65,000 to 78,500 parrots are captured each year. The overall mortality rate for trapped parrots exceeds 75% before reaching a purchaser, which translates to about 50,000 to 60,000 dead birds annually, making this trade terribly inhumane and wasteful. The rate of parrot seizures by the environmental police, Procuraduría Federal de Protección al Ambiente (Profepa), was assessed. The seizures by Profepa represent an average of only about 2% of the annual illegal trade. Seizure rates appear to be mostly correlated with the level of enforcement effort. It is apparent that Profepa and other agencies currently lack adequate personnel and budgets to police the trade. Through analysis of seizure data obtained from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the assessment determined that only a small percentage of the annual illegal capture is being smuggled out of the country; about 86% to 96% of all trapped Mexican parrots stay in the internal trade. This is a shift from the 1970s and 1980s when the lucrative and huge USA market was considered to drive the trafficking. Now, Mexico must solve the problem internally. This assessment finds that fewer than 150 registered trappers have focused on parrots exclusively. No parrot trapping had been authorized by wildlife officials between 2003 and late 2006. Prior to 2003, the trapping regulations had many drawbacks. Officials were unable to control the number of specimens taken, the time period or the place of capture.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TAG Operational Structure
    PARROT TAXON ADVISORY GROUP (TAG) Regional Collection Plan 5th Edition 2020-2025 Sustainability of Parrot Populations in AZA Facilities ...................................................................... 1 Mission/Objectives/Strategies......................................................................................................... 2 TAG Operational Structure .............................................................................................................. 3 Steering Committee .................................................................................................................... 3 TAG Advisors ............................................................................................................................... 4 SSP Coordinators ......................................................................................................................... 5 Hot Topics: TAG Recommendations ................................................................................................ 8 Parrots as Ambassador Animals .................................................................................................. 9 Interactive Aviaries Housing Psittaciformes .............................................................................. 10 Private Aviculture ...................................................................................................................... 13 Communication ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Illegal Trade of the Psittacidae in Venezuela
    Illegal trade of the Psittacidae in Venezuela A DA S ÁNCHEZ-MERCADO,MARIANNE A SMÜSSEN,JON P AUL R ODRÍGUEZ L ISANDRO M ORAN,ARLENE C ARDOZO-URDANETA and L ORENA I SABEL M ORALES Abstract Illegal wildlife trade is one of the major threats to trade involves avian species, poached to supply both domes- Neotropical psittacids, with nearly % of species targeted tic and international demand for pets (Rosen & Smith, for the illegal pet trade. We analysed the most comprehen- ). Among birds, Neotropical psittacids are of primary sive data set on illegal wildlife trade currently available for conservation concern, with nearly % of species affected Venezuela, from various sources, to provide a quantitative by poaching for the illegal pet trade (Olah et al., ). assessment of the magnitude, scope and detectability of The data used to measure the magnitude of the illegal pet the trade in psittacids at the national level. We calculated trade in psittacids have come from four main sources: seiz- a specific offer index (SO) based on the frequency of ure records and surveys of trappers (Cantú Guzmán et al., which each species was offered for sale. Forty-seven species ), literature reviews (Pires, ; Alves et al., ), dir- of psittacids were traded in Venezuela during –,of ect observation in markets (Herrera & Hennessey, ; which were non-native. At least , individuals were Gastañaga et al., ; Silva Regueira & Bernard, ), traded, with an overall extraction rate of , individuals and observation of the proportion of nest cavities poached per year ( years of accumulated reports). Amazona (Wright et al., ; Pain et al., ; Zager et al., ). ochrocephala was the most frequently detected species Each source has a unique geographical and taxonomic (SO = .), with the highest extraction rate (, indivi- coverage and evaluates different aspects of the market duals per year), followed by Eupsittula pertinax (SO = .) chain.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines to the Use of Wild Birds in Research
    THE ORNITHOLOGICAL COUNCIL Providing Scientific Information about Birds GUIDELINES TO THE USE OF WILD BIRDS IN RESEARCH Special Publication 1997 Edited by Abbot S. Gaunt & Lewis W. Oring Third Edition 2010 Edited by Jeanne M. Fair, Editor-in-Chief Ellen Paul & Jason Jones, Associate Editors GUIDELINES TO THE USE OF WILD BIRDS IN RESEARCH Jeanne M. Fair1, Ellen Paul2, & Jason Jones3, Anne Barrett Clark4, Clara Davie4, Gary Kaiser5 1 Los Alamos National Laboratory, Atmospheric, Climate and Environmental Dynamics, MS J495, Los Alamos, NM 87506 2 Ornithological Council, 1107 17th St., N.W., Suite 250, Washington, D.C. 20036 3 Tetra Tech EC, 133 Federal Street, 6th floor, Boston, Massachusetts 02110 4 Binghamton University State University of New York, Department of Biology, PO BOX 6000 Binghamton, NY 13902-6000 5 402-3255 Glasgow Ave, Victoria, BC V8X 4S4, Canada Copyright 1997, 2010 by THE ORNITHOLOGICAL COUNCIL 1107 17th Street, N.W. Suite 250 Washington, D.C. 20036 http://www.nmnh.si.edu/BIRDNET Suggested citation Fair, J., E. Paul, and J. Jones, Eds. 2010. Guidelines to the Use of Wild Birds in Research. Washington, D.C.: Ornithological Council. Revision date August 2010 2 Dedication The Ornithological Council dedicates this 2010 revision to Lewis W. Oring and the late Abbot (Toby) S. Gaunt, whose commitment to the well-being of the birds for whom ornithologists share a deep and abiding concern has served our profession well for so many years. Toby Gaunt Lew Oring Revision date August 2010 3 Acknowledgments and disclaimer Third edition The Ornithological Council thanks the Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare of the National Institutes of Health for their financial support for the production of this revision.
    [Show full text]
  • Object Permanence in Four Species of Psittacine Birds: an African Grey
    AnimalLearning & Behavior 1990, 18 (1), 97-108 Object permanence in four species of psittacine birds: An African Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus), an Illiger mini macaw (Ara maracana), a parakeet (Melopsittacus undulatus), and a cockatiel tNymphicus hollandicus) IRENE M. PEPPERBERG and MILDRED S. FUNK Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois Four psittacids-an African Grey parrot, an Illiger macaw, a cockatiel, and a parakeet-were tested on object-permanence tasks that are commonly used to assess levels of understanding in human infants during their first 2 years. These birds showed Stage 6 competence, demonstrat­ ing that object permanence is not limited to mammals. The results for these birds were compar­ able to those of an African Grey parrot that·had been trained in interspecies communication prior to object-permanence testing. Our findings thus suggest that although language-like behavior provides a communication channel that facilitates testing, such language training is unlikely to affect the outcome of the tests. Object pennanence-the notion that objects are separate biana, Kamil & Balda, 1985; Vander Wall, 1982; entities that continue to exist when out of sight of the European jays, Garrulus glandarius, Bossema, 1979; observer-would seem to be one of the more important jackdaws, Corvus monedula, Etienne, 1976-1977; cognitive concepts, and thus an appropriate topic for com­ Lorenz, 1970; marsh tits, Parus palustris, Sherry, 1982; parative study. Object permanence was nevertheless Shettleworth & Krebs, 1982; chickadees, Parus largely ignored during almost a century of comparative atricapillus, Sherry, 1984; Shettleworth & Krebs, 1986) research (note Burghardt, 1984; Macphail, 1987), pos­ provide evidence for behaviors such as recovery of cached sibly because it was considered both innate and unitary-a food or cavity nesting that would appear to require a con­ concept so basic that researchers could not imagine how cept of object permanence.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeography of the Military Macaw (Ara Militaris) and the Great Green Macaw (A
    The Wilson Journal of Ornithology 127(4):661–669, 2015 PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF THE MILITARY MACAW (ARA MILITARIS) AND THE GREAT GREEN MACAW (A. AMBIGUUS) BASED ON MTDNA SEQUENCE DATA JESSICA R. EBERHARD,1,5 EDUARDO E. IÑIGO-ELIAS,2 ERNESTO ENKERLIN-HOEFLICH,3 AND E. PAÙL CUN4 ABSTRACT.—The Military Macaw (Ara militaris) and the Great Green Macaw (A. ambiguus) are species whose close relationship is reflected in their morphological similarity as well as their geographic ranges. Military Macaws have a disjunct distribution, found in Mexico as well as several areas in South America, while Great Green Macaws have two or more disjunct populations from Honduras to eastern Ecuador. We used mitochondrial sequence data to examine the phylogenetic relationships between these two species, and also among representative samples across their ranges. Our data clearly support recognition of the two species as being distinct evolutionary lineages, and while we found significant phylogeographic structure within A. militaris (between samples collected in eastern and western Mexico), we did not find any evidence of lineage divergence between A. ambiguus from Costa Rica and Ecuador. Received 12 December 2014. Accepted 30 May 2015. Key words: disjunct distribution, Great Green Macaw, Military Macaw, phylogeny, phylogeography. The Military Macaw (Ara militaris) and the South America, primarily east of the Andes from Great Green Macaw (A. ambiguus), sometimes northwestern Colombia and northwestern Vene- named Buffon’s Macaw, are both large macaws zuela to north-western Argentina (Ridgway 1916; that are closely related and possibly conspecific Chapman 1917; Alvarez del Toro 1980; Ridgely (Fjeldså et al. 1987, Collar et al.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMON WINTER BIRDS of CHACALA with Common English and Spanish Names Please Note: This List Cannot Be Used for Commercial Gain
    COMMON WINTER BIRDS of CHACALA with common English and Spanish names Please note: This list cannot be used for commercial gain. Most photos are from Flickr Birdshare & Flickr Birds Photos. Legend Habitat codes Status codes M – Montane (pine oak & semi-deciduous) CW – Common and widespread F – Forest CL – Common locally in proper habitat S – Scrub and agriculture A – Aquatic (Legend adapted from: Checklist of Birds found in MG – Mangrove & estuaries San Blas, Nayarit by Thomas P. Ryan) C – Coastal Note that sizes (cm) are average P – Pelagic Brown Pelican Snowy Egret Pelícano cafe Garceta pie-dorado 125 cm 60 cm CW CW P, C, A A Notes: Notes: Photo: Larry Meade Photo: Don McCullough Magnificent Frigate Yellow-crowned Night Heron Fragata magnifica Pedrete corona clara 230 cm 60 cm CW CL P, C, MG A Notes: Notes: Photo: ricmcarthur Photo: Zan Merrill Anhinga Black Vulture Anhinga americana Zopilote común 85 cm 145 cm CL CW A All Notes: Notes: Photo: Larry Meade Photo: Larry Meade Neotropic Cormorant Turkey Vulture Cormorán neotropical Zopilote aura 65 cm 190 cm CW CW P, MG All Notes: Notes: Photo: G. Tepke (pbase.com/gtepke) Photo: Larry Meade Great Egret Common Black Hawk Garza grande Aguililla-negra menor 95 cm 45 cm CW CL A F, S Notes: Notes: Photo: Fool-On-The-Hill 1 Photo: Zan Merrill Gray Hawk Rufous-bellied Aguillila gris Chachalaca 40 cm Chachalaca veintre- CW castaña F,S,MG 65 cm Notes: CL F,S Notes: Photo: Larry Mead Photo: fveronesi1's Willet Cinnamon Hummingbird Playero pihuiuí Colibri canelo 35 cm 10 cm CW CW A, C F, S, MG Notes: Notes: Photo: Jorge Montejo Photo: Zan Merrill Heerman’s Gull Citreoline Trogon Gaviota de Heerman Trogón citrino 45 cm 25 cm CW CL C,P F, S Notes: Notes: Photo: G.
    [Show full text]
  • Author Alex Kerekes in Mexico
    FINDING LOST CIVILIZATIONS AUTHOR ALEX KEREKES IN MEXICO Finding Lost Civilizations Alex Kerekes Park Place Publications Pacific Grove, california Finding Lost Civilizations Alexander Kerekes [email protected] Copyright © 2008 Alexander Kerekes All rights reserved under International and Pan-American copyright conventions. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews. ISBN 978-1-877809-12-5 Printed in the U.S.A. First U.S. Edition: July 2008 Published by PARK PLACE PUBLICATIONS PACIFIC GROVE, CALIFORNIA www.parkplacepublications.com 2 Preface ome people have asked me, “Is this story true?” The an- Sswer is, mostly yes. I am not an anthropologist document- ing scientific observations. What I am is a witness to history, a storytelling accidental tourist on a path less traveled, and a protector of rascals and innocents encountered during my journey into Mexico. Sit back, relax, and enjoy the excite- San Pedro Lagunillas ment I truly did experience. Oscar Wilde said something to the effect that the storyteller recognizes that recreation, not instruction, is the aim of conversation, and the storyteller is Zacualpan * * a far more civilized being than the blockhead who loudly expresses his disbelief in a story that is told for the amuse- ment of the company. I hope my story is both amusing and educational. Read on and judge for yourself. State of Nayarit, Mexico. 1 CHAPTERS Preface .................................................................................. 1 Sacred Hot Springs and Deer Roasts .................................... 65 The Thirteen Stations of the Cross .......................................... 5 The Treasures of El Conde ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Prevalence of Chlamydia Psittaci in Domesticated and Fancy Birds in Different Regions of District Faisalabad, Pakistan
    United Journal of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research Article Prevalence of Chlamydia Psittaci in Domesticated and Fancy Birds in Different Regions of District Faisalabad, Pakistan Siraj I1, Rahman SU1, Ahsan Naveed1* Anjum Fr1, Hassan S2, Zahid Ali Tahir3 1Institute of Microbiology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 2Institute of Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan 3DiagnosticLaboraoty, Kamalia, Toba Tek Singh, Pakistan Volume 1 Issue 1- 2018 1. Abstract Received Date: 15 July 2018 1.1. Introduction Accepted Date: 31 Aug 2018 The study was aimed to check the prevalence of this zoonotic bacterium which is a great risk Published Date: 06 Sep 2018 towards human population in district Faisalabad at Pakistan. 1.2. Methodology 2. Key words Chlamydia Psittaci; Psittacosis; In present study, a total number of 259 samples including fecal swabs (187) and blood samples Prevalence; Zoonosis (72) from different aviculture of 259 birds such as chickens, ducks, pigeons, parrots, Australian parrots, and peacock were collected from different regions of Faisalabad, Pakistan. After process- ing the samples were inoculated in the yolk sac of embryonated chicken eggs for the cultivation ofChlamydia psittaci(C. psittaci)and later identified through Modified Gimenez staining and later CFT was performed for the determination of antibodies titer against C. psittaci. 1.3. Results The results of egg inoculation and modified Gimenez staining showed 9.75%, 29.62%, 10%, 36%, 44.64% and 39.28% prevalence in the fecal samples of chickens, ducks, peacocks, parrots, pi- geons and Australian parrots respectively. Accordingly, the results of CFT showed 15.38%, 25%, 46.42%, 36.36% and 25% in chickens, ducks, pigeons, parrots and peacock respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • September 2011 Angel Wings
    Angel Wings A monthly journal for human angels who make a positive difference in companion birds' lives. September 2011 Volume 6, Issue IX Having trouble viewing this email? View as a Web Page Angel Toys For Angels September's Featured Toys In this month's issue: Angel Announcements Roasted Cauliflower Fishy Fun Recycling, Angel Style Medium Birds Featured Fid ~ Lineolated Parakeets Cleaning Cotton & Sisal Boings Angel Tips Rikki Sez Bedding for Nest Boxes Sterilizing Pine Cones Converting to a Healthy Diet Become a Volunteer Help Us Caged Balls Medium - Large Birds Button Chimes Small Birds Check out all the Angel Toys for Angels now! ANGEL ANNOUNCEMENTS Recycling, Angel Style Watch for upcoming events, news, website Funnel Fun updates, etc. here By Wyspur Kallis Funnel Fun ON THE SITE: Supplies you will need: Plastic Funnel - your choice of size ♥ New Items ♥ Whiffle Ball Cotton Supreme Rope™ ** ♥ Happy Flappers ♥ Pear link or baby link for hanging Masking Tape Scissors & Pliers ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ Whenever using cotton rope, put a small piece of tape on the ends to prevent unraveling. String the rope through the funnel. Roasted Cauliflower for Parronts and their birds By Toni Fortin This cauliflower tastes so good, a bit spicy & sweet. Thread the rope through the large opening of 1/2 head of cauliflower the funnel, then through the whiffle ball. Tie a Olive oil knot in the rope. Remove the masking tape Red pepper flakes from the knotted end. Cut washed cauliflower in pieces. Dry with paper towels. Put cauliflower in a bowl, drizzle with olive oil to coat. Add a couple shakes of red papper flakes and toss gently.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2. Animals
    AC20 Doc. 8.5 Annex (English only/Seulement en anglais/Únicamente en inglés) REVIEW OF SIGNIFICANT TRADE ANALYSIS OF TRADE TRENDS WITH NOTES ON THE CONSERVATION STATUS OF SELECTED SPECIES Volume 2. Animals Prepared for the CITES Animals Committee, CITES Secretariat by the United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre JANUARY 2004 AC20 Doc. 8.5 – p. 3 Prepared and produced by: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK UNEP WORLD CONSERVATION MONITORING CENTRE (UNEP-WCMC) www.unep-wcmc.org The UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre is the biodiversity assessment and policy implementation arm of the United Nations Environment Programme, the world’s foremost intergovernmental environmental organisation. UNEP-WCMC aims to help decision-makers recognise the value of biodiversity to people everywhere, and to apply this knowledge to all that they do. The Centre’s challenge is to transform complex data into policy-relevant information, to build tools and systems for analysis and integration, and to support the needs of nations and the international community as they engage in joint programmes of action. UNEP-WCMC provides objective, scientifically rigorous products and services that include ecosystem assessments, support for implementation of environmental agreements, regional and global biodiversity information, research on threats and impacts, and development of future scenarios for the living world. Prepared for: The CITES Secretariat, Geneva A contribution to UNEP - The United Nations Environment Programme Printed by: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 0DL, UK © Copyright: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre/CITES Secretariat The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP or contributory organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • A Courting Behavioral Study on a Hyacinth Macaw (Anodorhynchus Hyacinthinus) Pair
    The Pegasus Review: UCF Undergraduate Research Journal (URJ) Volume 12 Issue 1 Article 2 2020 A Courting Behavioral Study on a Hyacinth Macaw (Anodorhynchus hyacinthinus) Pair Pamela Mulkay University of Central Florida Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/urj University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Office of Undergraduate Research at STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Pegasus Review: UCF Undergraduate Research Journal (URJ) by an authorized editor of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Mulkay, Pamela (2020) "A Courting Behavioral Study on a Hyacinth Macaw (Anodorhynchus hyacinthinus) Pair," The Pegasus Review: UCF Undergraduate Research Journal (URJ): Vol. 12 : Iss. 1 , Article 2. Available at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/urj/vol12/iss1/2 Mulkay: A Courting Behavioral Study on a Hyacinth Macaw Published 9-17 Vol. 12.1: April 8, 2020 THE PEGASUS REVIEW: UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH JOURNAL A Courting Behavioral Study on a Hyacinth Macaw (Anodorhynchus hyacinthinus) Pair By: Pamela Mulkay Faculty Mentor: Frank Logiudice UCF Department of Biology ABSTRACT: This study observes the courtship behaviors of an Anodorhynchus hyacinthinus pair in the Central Florida Zoo and Botanical Gardens in Sanford, Florida. A. hyacinthinus reproductive behaviors occur in four steps in the following order: Allopreening, Cloacal allopreening, Back to Back Copulation Position and finally, Copulation (Schneider 2006). Behavioral observations were taken twice a week for an average of 2 to 3 hours each day for ten weeks. The resulting data was analyzed based on the different actions, types of movement, and types of maintenance observed of the A.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Legal Pet Guide Possession Import Take Comments
    ALASKA LEGAL PET GUIDE POSSESSION IMPORT TAKE COMMENTS This is only a guide of animals that MAY be legal in a state. Due to the extensive amount of laws involved that are constantly changing, UAPPEAL and contributors of these guides cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information. Users are responsible for checking all laws BEFORE getting an animal. Legal as Pets as Legal Permit Register Pets for Legal Permit Pets for Legal ARACHNID, CENTIPEDE, MILLIPEDE All Yes No No Yes No Yes No known ADFG laws BATS Myotis, Keen's No No No Native/Live Game - Banned as pets Myotis, Little Brown No No No Native/Live Game - Banned as pets Silver-haired No No No Native/Live Game - Banned as pets All No No NA Live game - banned as pets BEARS Black No No No Native/Live Game - Banned as pets Brown No No No Native/Live Game - Banned as pets Polar No No No Native/Live Game - Banned as pets All No No NA Live game - no pets BIRDS Albatross, Black-footed No No No Native/Live Game - Banned as pets Albatross, Short-tailed No No No State Endangered; Native species - banned as pets Ammoperdix (Genus) Yes Yes No Yes Yes NA Aviculture Permit needed to import or possess Canary Yes No No Yes NA Exempt Live Game - No ADFG permit needed; See Ag laws Capercaille Yes Yes No Yes Yes NA Aviculture Permit needed to import or possess Chickadee, Black-capped No No No Native/Live Game - Banned as pets Chickadee, Boreal No No No Native/Live Game - Banned as pets Chickadee, Chestnut-backed No No No Native/Live Game - Banned as pets Chickadee, Gray-headed No No No Native/Live Game
    [Show full text]