DOCSLIB.ORG

Escapes!! the Canary-Winged Parakeet in the US

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Escapes!! the Canary-Winged Parakeet in the US Bird Talk Magazine, May 2000 Donald Brightsmith Escapes!! The Canary-winged Parakeet in the US By Donald Brightsmith Originally published in Bird Talk Magazine May 2000 As I inched along through the afternoon traffic down the shady streets of the Coral Gables section of Miami I heard the characteristic chattering of a small group of parakeets. I swerved rapidly into a side street, parked, grabbed my binoculars and dove into the suburban jungle to look for the birds. There in the top of a tall fig tree near the edge of the University of Miami campus was a flock of Canary- winged Parakeets (Yellow-chevroned Parakeets). For me these were not just any parakeets, but the reason why I had made the 16-hour drive from North Carolina. It was late May 1996 and I had just agreed to write the Birds of North America Species account on the Canary-winged Parakeet for the American Ornithologists’ Union as part of their effort to summarize what is known about every species that occurs in North America, native or introduced. In this column I will share with you some of my findings and adventures that resulted from my attempts to summarize what is known about Canary-winged Parakeets. As I began my work I quickly realized that there were two very different types of birds lumped in the species I knew as “Canary-winged Parakeet.” First there is the White-winged Parakeet, an olive-green bird with a yellow band on the upper surface of the wing and white wing feathers that form a huge white wing patch when the bird flies. This form is native to dense river edge forest along the Amazon River in South America from northeastern Peru through Brazil. The other form the Canary-winged or Yellow-chevroned Parakeet is a yellower green, has a darker bill and no white in the wing, but has the yellow band on the upper wing. This species is found in open woodlands and savannahs from Bolivia through southern Brazil. I was confused why two such different looking birds were considered the same species so I contacted Dick Banks the head of the American Ornithologists check list committee to ask him about this. Two weeks after reviewing the literature and the specimens at the Smithsonian Museum he informed me that they should in fact be considered two different species. And just like that I doubled the amount of work because now I had to write two complete accounts, one for each species! Road trip I felt I could only learn so much about the species from books so decided it was time to head off to Miami. With the help of old published accounts and a local bird guide, Mort Cooper, I was soon locating small flocks of both species as they zoomed through the parks and yards of Coral Gables, Coconut Grove and other areas of Miami. Mort showed me a Canary Island Date Palm where he estimated as many as 25 pairs of White-winged Parakeets had nested that season. The palm was riddled with about 30 holes chewed out of the bases of the dead palm fronds. Each hole led to a perfectly vertical tunnel, just like most of the nests I have seen of this and related species of www.macawproject.org 1 Bird Talk Magazine, May 2000 Donald Brightsmith Brotogeris parakeets. This particular palm was interesting because it was located in the entrance courtyard of a lovely temple. Needless to say, as I began to sneak around the grounds at five AM to record the calls of the parakeets it aroused the suspicions of the security guard who kindly asked me to leave. On the U. of Miami Campus I was checking out an area of palms where White-winged Parakeets nested in the late 1970’s when I came across an active nest of Yellow-chevroned Parakeets. This nest was also in a Canary Island Date Palm, this time sandwiched between a major avenue and a parking lot. So much for these birds needing pristine wilderness, it seems that they are willing to nest almost anywhere. Both species are also not too picky where they eat, and seem to adapt rapidly to the species available in the parks and yards in Miami. I watched birds eating small figs, flowers of bottlebrush trees, and fruits and flowers from a variety of palm trees. Both species also make extensive use of bird feeders. In her masters thesis Crystal Schroads reported that at a single bird feeder a flock of 300-350 White-winged Parakeets would visit every day and this flock consumed about 400 lbs of bird food a month. As evening approached I followed small groups of birds as they formed together into larger bands and prepared to roost for the night. Following a group of White-wings lead me to Baptist Hospital. Here a group of 80 birds flew in wide noisy circles as the light began to fade. At this point the entire group finally settled down to roost in the tall Royal Palms that lined the entrance drive to the hospital. Here the birds perched in the dense centers of the palms or hung underneath the long drooping palm fronds. The Yellow-chevroned Parakeets also roosted in tall palms, but they roosted independently from the White-wings behind an apartment complex only a few kilometers away. This segregation by the species was not only confined to roosts, but to all aspects of their lives. Despite the fact that both species were found in the same areas on many occasions, I never saw a mixed pair. In fact in the 126 flocks seen, only one contained a mix of both species. Since these birds almost always travel with their mates, this suggests that the birds are not hybridizing commonly and that theses two forms are in fact different species. History of the introduction The proceeding section explained the natural history of these birds, but gives us no idea how the birds came to be in the US in the first place. In 1968 the federal government began keeping good records of the numbers and species of birds that were being imported into the country. Since this time over 300,000 of these birds have been imported. Over 85% the importation occurred from 1968 – 1972 when approximately 230,000 arrived. Most of these were White-wings exported from Peru in these early years. The exportation from Peru reached ridiculously high levels during this period: over 120,000 White-winged Parakeets were exported in 1971 alone! With such a massive influx of birds into the US it was inevitable that some birds escaped, and the history of these escapes is reflected in the sightings reported by bird watchers and ornithologists. The first report of these parakeets in the wild in the US is of a group of 5 White-wings flying free in Miami in 1965. From here the number of reports and the number of individuals exploded. In 1969 www.macawproject.org 2 Bird Talk Magazine, May 2000 Donald Brightsmith groups of 50 –75 were roosting in Miami and it was thought that the birds were breeding. By 1971 there was a roosting flock of over 200 in the Coconut Grove section of Miami. By 1974 the species was being seen in the Tampa/ St. Petersburg area on Florida’s west coast and in an area of over 150 miles along Florida’s east coast. At this time the population in the Miami area alone was thought to be nearly 2,000 birds. White-winged parakeets also made a dramatic appearance in other areas. In the early 1970’s small populations established in San Francisco and Los Angeles California, and individuals were seen in Ohio, New Jersey, New York, Connecticut and Virginia. How can we explain this rapid expansion into the US by this species? The birds were sold for as little as $9.95 each and many of these pets probably escaped or were released by owners that were tired of hearing their harsh chattering. This may go a long way to explain the sources of the occasional escapes in the northern states, but does not seem to explain the rapid explosion in areas such as Miami and Los Angeles. The small local escapes were apparently augmented by larger and more systematic escapes. According to Dr. Levine, owner of Parrot Jungle, most of these birds were imported into the US in crates containing about 300 birds each. From each crate, government officials were required to remove and inspect one bird. The quickest and easiest way to accomplish this was to break a small hole in the side of the crate and grab out a bird. During this process, an average of 6 – 8 birds apparently escaped per crate. If the 230,000 parakeets were imported in crates holding 300 each that would mean that over 760 crates were imported. If 6 – 8 birds escaped per crate, some simple math suggests that 4,500 – 6,000 may have escaped during these government checks. While this may be an over estimate, this line of reasoning fits well with the rapid explosion of this species in Florida and California, states that receive the great majority of the wildlife imported into the US. Currently in Florida the species is confined to the Miami area where an estimated 150-300 remain. The populations in California persisted at least into the late 1990’s but today only a few individuals remain. Similarly the individuals from other states only survived for a few years and there have been no reports in recent years.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Volume 2. Animals
    AC20 Doc. 8.5 Annex (English only/Seulement en anglais/Únicamente en inglés) REVIEW OF SIGNIFICANT TRADE ANALYSIS OF TRADE TRENDS WITH NOTES ON THE CONSERVATION STATUS OF SELECTED SPECIES Volume 2. Animals Prepared for the CITES Animals Committee, CITES Secretariat by the United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre JANUARY 2004 AC20 Doc. 8.5 – p. 3 Prepared and produced by: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK UNEP WORLD CONSERVATION MONITORING CENTRE (UNEP-WCMC) www.unep-wcmc.org The UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre is the biodiversity assessment and policy implementation arm of the United Nations Environment Programme, the world’s foremost intergovernmental environmental organisation. UNEP-WCMC aims to help decision-makers recognise the value of biodiversity to people everywhere, and to apply this knowledge to all that they do. The Centre’s challenge is to transform complex data into policy-relevant information, to build tools and systems for analysis and integration, and to support the needs of nations and the international community as they engage in joint programmes of action. UNEP-WCMC provides objective, scientifically rigorous products and services that include ecosystem assessments, support for implementation of environmental agreements, regional and global biodiversity information, research on threats and impacts, and development of future scenarios for the living world. Prepared for: The CITES Secretariat, Geneva A contribution to UNEP - The United Nations Environment Programme Printed by: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 0DL, UK © Copyright: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre/CITES Secretariat The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP or contributory organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • Massive Seed Predation of Pseudobombax Grandiflorum (Bombacaceae) by Parakeets Brotogeris Versicolurus (Psittacidae) in a Forest Fragment in Brazil’
    Notes 613 BlOTROPlCA 34(4): 613-615 2002 Massive Seed Predation of Pseudobombax grandiflorum (Bombacaceae) by Parakeets Brotogeris versicolurus (Psittacidae) in a Forest Fragment in Brazil’ ABSTRACT Here we report massive seed predation of Pseudobombax grandzfirum (Bombacaceae) by Botogeris versicolurus (Psitta- cidae) in a forest fragment in Brazil. The intensity of seed predation was very high when compared to other studies in continuous forest, perhaps resulting from a scarcity of resources in such areas. This scarcity may limit the range of parrot’s diet to a few plant species. It suggests that studies of Psittacidae seed predation may be important for con- servation of some plants in fragments. Kq word: Atlantic Forest; Brazil; Brotogeris versicolurus; firest papentation; Pseudobombax grandiflorum; Psitta- riake; seed preaktion. A SUBSTANTIAL PORTION OF SEED CROP is lost to predators in every fruiting event Uanzen 1972, 1981; Howe 1980; Schupp 1988) and because of this extensive mortality, seed predation is one of the major ecological and evolutionary forces affecting individual plants, populations, and communities (Schupp 1988). Psittacids (parrots, macaws, and parakeets) have been recognized as important pre-dispersal seed predators in the Neotropics Uanzen 1972, Higgins 1979, Howe 1980, Janzen 1981, Galetti & Rodrigues 1992, Coates-Estrada et al. 1993). The diet of most species consists of fruits, seeds, and flowers, which are taken in treetops or on the ground (Forshaw 1981, Roth 1984, Galetti 1993); however, despite their potential impacts on plant recruitment, very few data are available on the intensity of seed predation by parrots, especially in fragmented forests (Higgins 1979, Galetti & Rodrigues 1992). The Canary-winged Parakeet Brotogeris uersicolurw is a small, long-tailed psittacid that is widely distributed in South America.
    [Show full text]
  • Brotogeris Jugularis) in Costa Rica
    October 1981] Short Communications 841 appreciable residuesof pollutants may be present. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) have been found on the surface of polystyrene spherules, apparently absorbed from seawater, in a concentration of five parts per million (Carpenter et al. 1972), and it may be assumedthat organochlorinesare associatedwith other oceanic plastic items. Measurable residuesof DDT, DDE, and PCBs were detected in visceral fat from Black-footed and Laysan albatross on Midway (Fisher 1973). Although the origin of such ingested pol- lutants may be in the North Pacific food chain, it may also be associated with plastics ingested by albatross. Our stay on Midway Islands was supported by a National Science Foundation Grant (PCM 12351- A01) administeredby Dr. G. C. Whittow. We are grateful to CDR Kuhneman, Commanding Officer, for assistanceduring our stay at the U.S. Naval Air Facility, Midway Island. Special thanks to ENS Immel and the base game warden staff for invaluable aid and transportation to Eastern Island. We thank Elizabeth Flint, Department of Biology, U.C.L.A., for collecting fresh castingson French Frigate Shoals and G. H. Balazs for the use of unpublished data. We also thank Craig Harrison for his critical review of the manuscript. LITERATUIIE CITED CAIIPENTEII, E. J., S. J. ANDEIISON, G. R. HAlIVEY, H. P. MIKLAS, & B. B. PECK. 1972. Polystyrene spherules in coastal waters. Science 178: 749-750. DAY, R. H. 1980. The occurrence and characteristics of plastic pollution in Alaska's marine birds. Unpublished M.S. thesis, College, Alaska, Univ. Alaska. FISHEli, H. [. 1973. Pollutants in North Pacific albatrosses.Pacific Sci. 27; 220-225.
    [Show full text]
  • Exotic Birds in the New York City Area
    EXOTIC BIRDS IN THE NEW YORK CITY AREA JOHN BULL PART I In addition to the Ring-necked Pheasant (Phasianus colchicus), Rock Dove (Columba Zivia), Common Starling (Stumns vulgaris), and the House Sparrow (Passer domesticus), which were initially introduced into North America in the New York City region during the latter half of the nineteenth century, the Mute Swan (Cygnus odor) was also first imported here, though not until much later, in the second decade of this century. Unlike those widespread species, it is essentially restricted to the northeastern states, mainly within 100 miles of New York City. Within the past decade, waterfowl (11 species), parrots (11 species), and finches (sensu late) , i.e., Ploceidae, Estrildidae, and Fringillidae (12 species), lead the list of foreign introduced species that have managed to escape from time to time, but nearly all have failed to establish themselves. Of all the exotic, introduced species it is the family Psittacidae (parrots) which have made the headlines in recent years. Certain members of this well-known tropical group have been commonly imported and have escaped into the greater New York area, and one species appears to have become established. Within the past dozen years or so, members of the parrot family have been imported into the United States in tremendous numbers from many parts of the world. This has been made possible through the development of specific antibiotics in the treatment of psittacosis or “parrot fever”-more properly ornithosis or “bird fever,” as chickens, pigeons, and other kinds of birds are as much carriers of this contagious disease as are parrots.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Parrots 3 Other Major Groups of Parrots 16
    ONE What are the Parrots and Where Did They Come From? The Evolutionary History of the Parrots CONTENTS The Marvelous Diversity of Parrots 3 Other Major Groups of Parrots 16 Reconstructing Evolutionary History 5 Box 1. Ancient DNA Reveals the Evolutionary Relationships of the Fossils, Bones, and Genes 5 Carolina Parakeet 19 The Evolution of Parrots 8 How and When the Parrots Diversified 25 Parrots’ Ancestors and Closest Some Parrot Enigmas 29 Relatives 8 What Is a Budgerigar? 29 The Most Primitive Parrot 13 How Have Different Body Shapes Evolved in The Most Basal Clade of Parrots 15 the Parrots? 32 THE MARVELOUS DIVERSITY OF PARROTS The parrots are one of the most marvelously diverse groups of birds in the world. They daz- zle the beholder with every color in the rainbow (figure 3). They range in size from tiny pygmy parrots weighing just over 10 grams to giant macaws weighing over a kilogram. They consume a wide variety of foods, including fruit, seeds, nectar, insects, and in a few cases, flesh. They produce large repertoires of sounds, ranging from grating squawks to cheery whistles to, more rarely, long melodious songs. They inhabit a broad array of habitats, from lowland tropical rainforest to high-altitude tundra to desert scrubland to urban jungle. They range over every continent but Antarctica, and inhabit some of the most far-flung islands on the planet. They include some of the most endangered species on Earth and some of the most rapidly expanding and aggressive invaders of human-altered landscapes. Increasingly, research into the lives of wild parrots is revealing that they exhibit a corresponding variety of mating systems, communication signals, social organizations, mental capacities, and life spans.
    [Show full text]
  • What Eats Parrots?
    Bird Talk Magazine, August 2002 Donald Brightsmith What Eats Parrots? What are the major predators on parrots in the wild? By Donald Brightsmith Originally published in Bird Talk Magazine August 2002 Recently I was asked what animals prey on parrots in the wild. I guess the short answer to that is . not much. In general parrots are quite wary and do a number of things to make sure that they are not captured by predators. They usually feed in groups high in the tree canopies. The high perches and large groups ensures that there are many eyes to spot predators and then an easy escape as they drop from the tall trees. Parrot nests also seem to be chosen to reduce the risk of predation. Most species in predator rich environments, especially the macaws I work with, prefer to nest in high trees in relatively exposed spots from which the adults can watch for danger and take flight quickly if needed. Those species that nest in the forest understory where they are more vulnerable take great precautions to avoid being captured when they return to their nests. I have watched three such species in the wild as they approach their nests, the Cobalt-winged Parakeet, Tui Parakeet and the Gray-cheeked Parakeet. All three of these birds are normally loud and raucous (those who own them as pets will back me up on this one I am sure). They call constantly when in flight, and usually even continue to chatter while feeding. But when they return to their nests it is a very different matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Broken Screens: the Regulation of Live Animal Imports in the United States
    Broken Screen S The Regulation of Live Animal Imports in the United States DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE Defenders of Wildlife is a national, nonprofit membership organization dedicated to the protection of all native wild animals and plants in their natural communities. PROJECT CONTRIBUTORS The Consortium for Conservation Medicine (CCM) is a collaborative institution linking Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Tufts University School of Veterinary Medicine Center for Conservation Medicine, The University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, the University of Wisconsin-Madison Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, the U.S. Geological Society National Wildlife Health Center and the Wildlife Trust. CCM strives to understand the links among human changes to the environment, the health of all species including humans, and the conservation of biodiversity. www.conservationmedicine.org The Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) is part of the Species Survival Commission of The World Conservation Union (IUCN). The ISSG consist of about 150 scientific and policy experts on invasive species from more than 40 countries. The ISSG aims to reduce threats to natural ecosystems and the native species they contain by increasing awareness of invasive alien species, and of ways to prevent, control or eradicate them. www.issg.org ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Defenders of Wildlife Principal Author: Peter T. Jenkins Co-authors: Kristen Genovese, Heidi Ruffler Additional assistance: Carroll Muffett, Stas Burgiel, Kelly Malsch, Timm Kroeger, Mark Cheater, Robert Irvin and Gabriela Chavarria Researcher: David Tucker Editor: Kate Davies Art Director: Jen Lee Consortium for Conservation Medicine Principal Contributor: Katherine F. Smith Additional assistance: Peter Daszak and Lisa Schloegel IUCN Invasive Species Specialist Group Principal Contributor: Michael Browne Additional assistance: Shyama Pagad, UniServices Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Office of Endangered Species U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service United
    In the Office of Endangered Species U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service United States Department of Interior Photo: iStockPhoto A Petition to List 14 Species of Foreign Parrots, Macaws, & Cockatoos as Threatened or Endangered Under the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531 et seq. January 29, 2008 Petitioner: Friends of Animals, 777 Post Road, Suite 205, Darien, Connecticut 06820 Petition Prepared by: Jamie Cotter, Matthew Willson, Kay Bond, Esq., & Lee Hall, Esq. Table of Contents I. Introduction…………………………………………………………………..1 II. The ESA Listing Process…………………………………………………….2 A. ESA’s Listing Requirements…………………………………………….2 B. Listing Decision Basis………………………………………....................2 III. BirdLife International, NatureServe, and the IUCN Red List……………3 A. BirdLife International………………………………………...................3 B. NatureServe………………………………………………………………4 C. IUCN Red List……………………………………………………………4 IV. Species Accounts……………………………………………………………..6 A. Blue-throated macaws (Ara glaucogularis)…………………………….6 1. Description……………………………………………………...6 2. Distribution and Range……………………………..................6 3. Life History……………………………………………………..6 4. Abundance and Trend…………………………………………7 5. Threats………………………………………………………….7 B. Blue-headed macaws (Propyrrhura couloni)…………………………....9 1. Description……………………………………………………...9 2. Distribution and Range……………………………..................9 3. Life History……………………………………………………..9 4. Abundance and Trend………………………………………..10 5. Threats………………………………………………………...10 C. Crimson shining parrots……………………………………………….11 1. Description…………………………………………………….11
    [Show full text]
  • Survival on the Ark: Life-History Trends in Captive Parrots A
    Animal Conservation. Print ISSN 1367-9430 Survival on the ark: life-history trends in captive parrots A. M. Young1, E. A. Hobson1, L. Bingaman Lackey2 & T. F. Wright1 1 Department of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, USA 2 International Species Information System, Eagan, MN, USA Keywords Abstract captive breeding; ISIS; life-history; lifespan; parrot; Psittaciformes. Members of the order Psittaciformes (parrots and cockatoos) are among the most long-lived and endangered avian species. Comprehensive data on lifespan and Correspondence breeding are critical to setting conservation priorities, parameterizing population Anna M. Young, Department of Biology, viability models, and managing captive and wild populations. To meet these needs, MSC 3AF, New Mexico State University, we analyzed 83 212 life-history records of captive birds from the International Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA Species Information System (ISIS) and calculated lifespan and breeding para- Tel: +1 575 646 4863; meters for 260 species of parrots (71% of extant species). Species varied widely in Fax: +1 575 646 5665 lifespan, with larger species generally living longer than smaller ones. The highest Email: [email protected] maximum lifespan recorded was 92 years in Cacatua moluccensis, but only 11 other species had a maximum lifespan over 50 years. Our data indicate that while some Editor: Iain Gordon captive individuals are capable of reaching extraordinary ages, median lifespans Associate Editor: Iain Gordon are generally shorter than widely assumed, albeit with some increase seen in birds presently held in zoos. Species that lived longer and bred later in life tended to be Received 18 January 2011; accepted 13 June more threatened according to IUCN classifications.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Birds of South America
    TRAFFIC Bird’s-eye view: REPORT Lessons from 50 years of bird trade regulation & conservation in Amazon countries DECEMBER 2018 Bernardo Ortiz-von Halle About the author and this study: Bernardo Ortiz-von Halle, a biologist and TRAFFIC REPORT zoologist from the Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia, has more than 30 years of experience in numerous aspects of conservation and its links to development. His decades of work for IUCN - International Union for Conservation of Nature and TRAFFIC TRAFFIC, the wildlife trade monitoring in South America have allowed him to network, is a leading non-governmental organization working globally on trade acquire a unique outlook on the mechanisms, in wild animals and plants in the context institutions, stakeholders and challenges facing of both biodiversity conservation and the conservation and sustainable use of species sustainable development. and ecosystems. Developing a critical perspective The views of the authors expressed in this of what works and what doesn’t to achieve lasting conservation goals, publication do not necessarily reflect those Bernardo has put this expertise within an historic framework to interpret of TRAFFIC, WWF, or IUCN. the outcomes of different wildlife policies and actions in South America, Reproduction of material appearing in offering guidance towards solutions that require new ways of looking at this report requires written permission wildlife trade-related problems. Always framing analysis and interpretation from the publisher. in the midst of the socioeconomic and political frameworks of each South The designations of geographical entities in American country and in the region as a whole, this work puts forward this publication, and the presentation of the conclusions and possible solutions to bird trade-related issues that are material, do not imply the expression of any linked to global dynamics, especially those related to wildlife trade.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Richness, Composition and Detectability of Psittacidae (Aves) In
    Revista Chilena de Historia Natural ISSN: 0716-078X [email protected] Sociedad de Biología de Chile Chile RODRIGUES, PATRÍSIA O.; BORGES, MARIANA R.; MELO, CELINE Richness, composition and detectability of Psittacidae (Aves) in three palm swamps of the Cerrado sensu lato in central Brazil Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, vol. 85, núm. 2, 2012, pp. 171-178 Sociedad de Biología de Chile Santiago, Chile Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=369944301003 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative PSITTACIDAE IN PALM SWAMPS OF BRAZIL 171 REVISTA CHILENA DE HISTORIA NATURAL Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 85: 171-178, 2012 © Sociedad de Biología de Chile RESEARCH ARTICLE Richness, composition and detectability of Psittacidae (Aves) in three palm swamps of the Cerrado sensu lato in central Brazil Riqueza, composición y detectabilidad de los Psittacidae (Aves) en tres pantanos del Cerrado sensu lato en el Brasil central PATRÍSIA O. RODRIGUES, MARIANA R. BORGES & CELINE MELO* Laboratório de Ornitologia e Bioacústica, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Rua Ceará, s/n, Umuarama, CEP: 38400-902, Uberlândia, Brasil *Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT The objectives of this study were: (1) to investigate the richness and composition of the Psittacidae in palm swamps; (2) to determine if the sizes of fl ocks vary seasonally; (3) to compare detectability rates according to species. Psittacid communities were observed from November 2006 to November 2007 in semimonthly visits to the area using fi xed-point observation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Parakeet Brotogeris Tirica Feeds on and Disperses the Fruits of the Palm Syagrus Romanzoffiana in Southeastern Brazil
    The parakeet Brotogeris tirica feeds on and disperses the fruits of the palm Syagrus romanzoffiana in Southeastern Brazil Ivan Sazima1,2 1Departamento de Zoologia e Museu de História Natural, Universidade Estadual de Campinas – UNICAMP, CP 6109, CEP 13083-970 Campinas, SP, Brasil 2Autor para correspondência: Ivan Sazima, e-mail: [email protected],www.unicamp.br Sazima, I. The parakeet Brotogeris tirica feeds on and disperses the fruits of the palm Syagrus romanzoffiana in Southeastern Brazil. Biota Neotrop., vol. 8, no. 1, Jan./Mar. 2008. Available from: <http://www.biotaneotropica. org.br/v8n1/en/abstract?short-communication+bn01008012008>. Abstract: Small psittacids remain unrecorded as dispersal agents of palm fruits in Brazil. I record here the plain parakeet (Brotogeris tirica), an Atlantic forest endemic, feeding on and dispersing the fruits of the palm Syagrus romanzoffiana at Ubatuba, northern coast of São Paulo, Southeastern Brazil. The birds removed the fruit and carried it away from the mother-tree in about 40% of the feeding records. While perched on trees and shrubs of the understorey, the parakeets removed and ingested most of the mesocarp, dropping the partly consumed fruit. As the parakeets damaged no the embryo and may feed at a distance from the mother-tree, they act as primary dispersal agents. This is the first substantiated record of a small Neotropical psittacid as a stomatochorous dispersal agent of palm fruits the size of A. romanzoffiana drupes. Keywords: Bird-plant symbiosis, Psittacidae, Arecaceae, feeding behaviour, synzoochory. Sazima, I. O periquito Brotogeris tirica come e dispersa os frutos da palmeira Syagrus romanzoffiana no sudeste do Brasil.
    [Show full text]