2018 Deloitte Outbound Investment and Operation Guide for Chinese
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Working with Vietnam, Russia's Rosneft Draws China's
Working with Vietnam, Russia's Rosneft Draws China’s Ire Rosneft is a crucial arm of Russian foreign policy, yet functions at times without direct Kremlin involvement. By Nicholas Trickett May 19, 2018 China has been the driving force behind Russia’s “Pivot to Asia,” becoming the largest individual consumer of Russian Russian President Vladimir Putin, right, and Vietnamese oil among its energy trade partners. Early this month, it President Tran Dai Quang attend a news conference was reported that Russia had completed the delivery of its following their meeting in the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia first S-400 regiment – the country’s most advanced air Thursday, June 29, 2017. defense system for export – to China. Beijing’s Ministry of Image Credit: Natalia Kolesnikova/Pool Photo via AP Commerce is signaling that trade turnover with Russia may reach $100 billion this year Russia and that investment under the aegis of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is growing fastest in percentage terms in Russia. Trade is up because oil prices are up, not necessarily because of an economic breakthrough, but the messaging is part of a broader commitment to making it appear as though all is well between the two countries. Two recent developments mark a significant change in the relationship. First, CEFC China Energy walked away from a deal to acquire 14.16 percent of Rosneft’s shares. Mired in scandal, the company has come under heavy scrutiny about its international expansion at home. Qatar stepped in to buy the shares instead as Rosneft changed its corporate strategy to provide better returns for shareholders and entice Qatar. -
EU-Korea Convergence and Partnerships 10 Years After the EU-ROK FTA, in the Post Covid Era and Within the US-China Trade War
EU-Korea convergence and partnerships 10 years after the EU-ROK FTA, in the post Covid era and within the US-China trade war Asia Centre is delighted to host a distinguished panel to discuss the current status of EU and Republic of Korea partnerships, relations and cooperation on multilateral issues and focused sectors of mutual interest. Please find some of the papers of the authors-speakers on the following pages. CHAIRS: • Lukas MANDL (chairman of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations with the Korean Peninsula) • Jean-François DI MEGLIO (President of Asia Centre) SPEAKERS : Panel 1 : The points of convergence within the analysis of post Covid international relations • Maximilian MAYER (University of Bonn) : introduction • Antoine BONDAZ (FRS, SciencesPo): “The Covid-19 pandemic as a great opportunity for greater EU-Korea coordinAtion And cooperAtion” • Nicola CASARINI (Istituto Affari InternAzionAli): « EU-Korea strAtegic pArtnership ten years after. Opportunities, and challenges, in the age of Covid and mounting US-China tensions » • Paul ANDRE (SciencesPo): « Is KoreA on the threshold of the G7? StrAtegic opportunities and challenges ahead in the perspective of an enlarged G7 » • René CONSOLO (French diplomAt who worked in PyongyAng): « The European Union’s Restrictive Measures against North Korea: a medium term view, beyond the current difficulties. Looking at solutions beyond the deadlock ». Transition: Elisabeth Suh (SWP): « Certain uncertainty – the cyber challeng posed by Pyongyang » Panel 2 : Future opportunities of EU-ROK cooperation in specific areas of competence and excellence • Ramon PACHECO-PARDO (King’s College): « Reassessment of the goals intended and achieved through the EU-ROK FTA » • Tereza NOVOTNA (MArie SklodowskA-Curie Fellow): « WhAt EU-ROK Partnership within the US-China Conflict? » • Brigitte DEKKER (ClingendAel Institute): « EU-ROK digital connectivity: United, we must stand. -
CRRC Corp -H 1766.HK, 1766 HK Outlook Bullish
Asia Pacific Equity Research 30 October 2016 Overweight CRRC Corp -H 1766.HK, 1766 HK Outlook bullish. Weak Q3 and delayed orders factored Price: HK$7.15 ▼ Price Target: HK$12.50 in. Maintain OW Previous: HK$13.00 3Q16 result expectedly weak; guidance turned positive with MU China demand outlook raised. CRRC reported 3Q NPAT of Rmb2.7B, -16% Infrastructure, Industrials & Y/Y as revenue fell 4% Y/Y while GPM slipped 1.1ppts Y/Y. These Transport results were largely expected in light of CRC’s muted procurement Karen Li, CFA AC YTD. However, we observed that guidance was noticeably more bullish (852) 2800-8589 (inside for takeaways from the briefing) despite the near-term earnings [email protected] Bloomberg JPMA KLI <GO> pressure in 4Q16. Mgmt expects this year's pent-up orders to be released J.P. Morgan Securities (Asia Pacific) Limited soon with CRC's leadership transition completed, while highlighting the robust MU demand in coming years driven by new product sales, rising Price Performance aftersales services, and increasing MU density. We remain positive on 10.5 the demand outlook for rolling stock in China, recommending switching 9.5 HK$ to late cycle railway capex plays over E&C contractors. Our new Dec-17 8.5 PT is HK$12.5 for CRRC-H; maintain OW. 7.5 6.5 CRC leadership transition completed; pace of procurement to Oct-15 Jan-16 Apr-16 Jul-16 Oct-16 1766.HK share price (HK$) accelerate into year-end. Mgmt was optimistic that this year’s long- HSCI (rebased) awaited orders will be released soon, highlighting CRC's new chief Mr. -
Energy China Forum 2019 9Th Asia-Pacific Shale Gas & Oil Summit 25-27 September, 2019 | Shanghai China
Energy China Forum 2019 9th Asia-Pacific Shale Gas & Oil Summit 25-27 September, 2019 | Shanghai China Opportunities in China Shale Gas & Oil OPPORTUNITY IN CHINA SHALE GAS & Oil MARKET As a fast growing market, China shale gas & oil industry has been proved with great resource potential, high government support and increasing drilling and fracturing operations, which makes the market full of opportunities for global technology, equipment and service providers. • Abundant shale resources: China is currently the 3rd largest shale gas producer in the world with a top reserve of 30 tcm. Meanwhile, China has nearly 100 billion tons of shale oil(tight oil) resources. • Highly valued and supported by the government: The country requires vigorous enhancement of domestic oil and gas development and formulate various supportive policies for shale development. • Surging production – It is the two most critical years of 2019-2020 for China to achieve its ambitious 5 years shale gas production target of 30 bcm. • Increasing capital investment: Both CNPC and Sinopec are increasing investment and expenditure with total expenditure for E&P of 216.1 billion CNY in 2018, up by 12% yoy. They are expected to stay high investment in 2019-2020 despite the market fluctuation. • Increasing operations - Starting from 2018, CNPC and Sinopec were accelerating their shale gas production. CNPC plans to drill 6,300 shale gas wells in total during 2018-2035. Sinopec plans to drill around 700 shale gas production wells during 2019-2020. • Cost/efficiency orientation – Chinese shale players are more eager than ever looking for cost-reducing and efficiency-optimizing solutions. -
Reunification of Korea: Economic Consequences from an External Point of View*
International Studies Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (October 2005): 21-33 21 Reunification of Korea: Economic Consequences from an External Point of View* EDWARD M. GRAHAM ** Korean reunification remains an uncertainty. When and if it comes, the condition of the North Korean economy is primitive compared to the economy of South Korea. Because of massive investment needs in the North, and under plausible assumptions regarding savings rates in a unified Korea, the balance of payment of a reunified Korea is likely to deteriorate significantly in the event of reunification. Foreign direct investment could ameliorate this result, and might contribute to a more rapid catch-up of the North to the South. Keywords: Korean reunification, economic effects of Korean re unification, balance of payments effects of Korean reunification Originally Prepared for 2005 IKUPD Forum "Korean Reunification in Korea-US Relationship," Harvard Law School, April 9, 2005. " The author would like to thank Ted Kim, Jim Lister, Paul Karner, Marcus Noland, two persons of Korean nationality who wish to remain anonymous, and two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on an earlier draft. Direct all correspondence co Edward M. Graham, Senior Fellow, Institute for International Economics, 1750 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington, D.C. 20036-1903 USA; Tel: 1-202-454-1326; E-mail: [email protected] Downloaded from Brill.com09/28/2021 05:49:58AM via free access 22 Reunification of Korea I. INTRODUCTION lmost all Koreans dream that the "two Koreas," the Republic of Korea A (ROK) in the south and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) in the north, reunify. -
Foreign Trade Regimes and Economic Development: South Korea
This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: Foreign Trade Regimes and Economic Development: South Korea Volume Author/Editor: Charles R. Frank, Jr., Kwang Suk Kim and Larry E. Westphal Volume Publisher: NBER Volume ISBN: 0-87014-507-X Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/fran75-1 Publication Date: 1975 Chapter Title: Economic Growth in South Korea since World War II Chapter Author: Charles R. Frank Jr., Kwang Suk Kim, Larry E. Westphal Chapter URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c4063 Chapter pages in book: (p. 6 - 24) Chapter 2 of ti proc of it 72! cent EconomicGrowth in South put Korea sinceWorldWar II dusi deci lack nun ECONOMIC DISORGANIZATION FOLLOWING LIBERATION The Japanese occupation of Korea ended on August 15, 1945 and was sup- planted in part by a U.S. military government. The immediate postwar period was characterized by extreme economic disorganization and stagnation caused by the sudden separation of the Korean economy from the Japanese economic bloc, and by the partition of the country along the 38th parallel. — Undercolonial rule from 1910 to 1945, the Korean economy became Me highly dependent upon Japan for capital, technology, and management. Of the Ma total authorized capital of business establishments in Korea, the Japanese Ch owned approximately 94 percent, as of 1940.1 Japanese engineers and tech- nicians employed in manufacturing, construction, and public utilities in 1944 constituted about 80 percent of the total technical manpower in Korea. The Pri proportion of Korean engineers and technicians was particularly small in the Ha metal and chemical industries (11 to 12 percent).2 The relative number of Korean business establishments was very small in high-technology industries— about 10 percent in the metal and chemical industries and 25 percent in the Ce4' machinery industry. -
Examples for Business Scenarios in Manufacturing Industry Published By: Deutsche Gesellschaft Für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) Gmbh
GLOBAL PROJ T Quality Infrastructure Examples for Business Scenarios in Manufacturing Industry Published by: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Registered offices Bonn and Eschborn, Germany Global Project Quality Infrastructure Tayuan Diplomatic Office Building No.14, Liangmahe Nanlu, chaoyang District Text 100600 Beijing, PR China Standardization Council Industrie 4.0 DKE Deutsche Kommission Elektrotechnik E [email protected] Elektronik Informationstechnik in DIN und VDE, I www.gpqi.org 60596 Frankfurt am Main Design/layout: National Intelligent Manufacturing Standardisation Administration Group Iris Christmann, Wiesbaden China Electronics Standardization Institute, No.1 Andingmen East Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100007, China Photo credits: Depositphotos Authors/Experts CHEN Jiangning, Siemens Ltd. China; CHENG Yuhang, China Electronics On behalf of Standardization Institute (CESI); CHEN Zhiman, Zhuzhou CRRC Times Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi) Electric Co., Ltd.; Wolfgang Dorst, ROI Management Consulting AG; Lucas Gierging, Spanflug Technologies GmbH; Dr. Hannes Leonardy, UNITY AG; Beijing, China 2020 Prof. Dr. Ulrich Loewen, Siemens AG; ZHAO Haitao, Siemens Ltd. China A joint project of: EXAMPLES FOR BUSINESS SCENARIOS IN MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY 3 Contents Introduction ....................................................... 4 Background.........................................................4 Common Understanding of “Use Cases”....................................4 Objectives -
Interim Report 2020 Sany Heavy Equipment International Holdings Company Limited 1 Financial Summary
Contents Financial Summary 2 Corporate Information 3 Chairman’s Statement 4 Management Discussion and Analysis 6 Disclosure of Interests 15 Corporate Governance and General Information 22 Directors and Senior Management 25 Interim Condensed Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss 32 Interim Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income 33 Interim Condensed Consolidated Statement of Financial Position 34 Interim Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity 36 Interim Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 38 Notes to Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Information 39 Interim Report 2020 Sany Heavy Equipment International Holdings Company Limited 1 Financial Summary Six months ended 30 June (RMB: ’000) 2020 2019 (Unaudited) (Unaudited) Increase (%) Revenue 3,815,076 3,043,706 25.3% Gross profit 1,030,096 943,993 9.1% Profit before tax 753,952 640,283 17.8% Net profit 638,619 552,763 15.5% Profit attributable to owners of the parent 639,705 551,732 15.9% Total assets 17,390,102 13,332,412 30.4% Total equity 7,409,704 6,774,283 9.4% Cash flows of operating activities 648,604 515,687 25.8% Cash flows of investing activities (1,180,500) (521,098) 126.5% Cash flows of financing activities 466,877 (176,147) (365.0%) Earnings per share1 – Basic (RMB Yuan) 0.21 0.18 16.7% – Diluted (RMB Yuan) 0.18 0.15 20.0% Six months ended 30 June (Percentage) 2020 2019 Increase (%) Gross profit margin 26.2% 30.5% (4.3%) Percentage of profit margin before tax attributable to shareholders of the Company2 19.8% 21.0% (1.2%) Assets turnover 23.2% 23.2% – Gearing ratio 57.4% 49.2% 8.2% Average total assets (RMB’000) 16,468,269 13,128,553 25.4% 1 The weighted average number of ordinary shares for the six months ended 30 June 2020 was 3,104,960,486 (six months ended 30 June 2019: 3,061,638,898), details of which are set out in note 9 to the interim condensed consolidated financial statements. -
Asia's Energy Security
the national bureau of asian research nbr special report #68 | november 2017 asia’s energy security and China’s Belt and Road Initiative By Erica Downs, Mikkal E. Herberg, Michael Kugelman, Christopher Len, and Kaho Yu cover 2 NBR Board of Directors Charles W. Brady Ryo Kubota Matt Salmon (Chairman) Chairman, President, and CEO Vice President of Government Affairs Chairman Emeritus Acucela Inc. Arizona State University Invesco LLC Quentin W. Kuhrau Gordon Smith John V. Rindlaub Chief Executive Officer Chief Operating Officer (Vice Chairman and Treasurer) Unico Properties LLC Exact Staff, Inc. President, Asia Pacific Wells Fargo Regina Mayor Scott Stoll Principal, Global Sector Head and U.S. Partner George Davidson National Sector Leader of Energy and Ernst & Young LLP (Vice Chairman) Natural Resources Vice Chairman, M&A, Asia-Pacific KPMG LLP David K.Y. Tang HSBC Holdings plc (Ret.) Managing Partner, Asia Melody Meyer K&L Gates LLP George F. Russell Jr. President (Chairman Emeritus) Melody Meyer Energy LLC Chairman Emeritus Honorary Directors Russell Investments Joseph M. Naylor Vice President of Policy, Government Lawrence W. Clarkson Dennis Blair and Public Affairs Senior Vice President Chairman Chevron Corporation The Boeing Company (Ret.) Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA U.S. Navy (Ret.) C. Michael Petters Thomas E. Fisher President and Chief Executive Officer Senior Vice President Maria Livanos Cattaui Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. Unocal Corporation (Ret.) Secretary General (Ret.) International Chamber of Commerce Kenneth B. Pyle Joachim Kempin Professor; Founding President Senior Vice President Norman D. Dicks University of Washington; NBR Microsoft Corporation (Ret.) Senior Policy Advisor Van Ness Feldman LLP Jonathan Roberts Clark S. -
Guidance for Taxpayers on the Mutual Agreement Procedure (Q&A)
Guidance for Taxpayers on the Mutual Agreement Procedure (Q&A) July, 2019 Office of the Mutual Agreement Procedure National Tax Agency, Japan This guidance is to complement the contents of the Commissioner’s Directive on the Mutual Agreement Procedure (Administrative Guidelines)*1. This provides clear MAP guidance to taxpayers required by the recommendation of the BEPS Action14 Final Report*2 published in October, 2015. For further information about the Mutual Agreement Procedure, please refer to the Commissioner’s Directive on the Mutual Agreement Procedure (Administrative Guidelines). *1 Amended on May 7, 2019. *2 The BEPS Action14 Final Report: Element 2.1 Countries should publish rules, guidelines and procedures to access and use the MAP and take appropriate measures to make such information available to taxpayers. Countries should ensure that their MAP guidance is clear and easily accessible to the public. Table of Contents 1. The Outline of the Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) Q1-1 What is a MAP? Q1-2 What is the purpose of MAP? Q1-3 Which provisions of a tax treaty allow a MAP? Q1-4 Please provide information regarding the number of MAP cases? Q1-5 Which countries can Japan’s competent authorities negotiate with on MAP cases? Q1-6 Please give details about the circumstances surrounding MAP around the world. Q1-7 How long does it take to resolve a MAP case after its request is made? Q1-8 What items should taxpayers pay attention to for making a MAP request? 2. MAP Q2-1 Who is eligible to request for MAP assistance? Q2-2 How can a taxpayer request for MAP assistance? Q2-3 Can a taxpayer consult with the NTA before requesting MAP assistance? Q2-4 Is there a deadline for holding a pre-filing consultation? Q2-5 What kind of documents should be prepared for a pre-filing consultation? Q2-6 Please provide the application form for requesting MAP assistance. -
SINOPEC Lubricants for Off-Highway Equipment S in O PE
SINOPEC Lubricants For Off-Highway Equipment SINOPEC Working Together For Wonderful Future For Wonderful Together Working SINOPEC Lubricant SINOPEC Lubricants for Off-Highway Equipment Contents Company Introduction Lubrication Solution for Off-Highway Equipment Major Lubricants for Off-Highway Equipment Integrity Leads To Win-Win Cooperation Introduction Sinopec Lubricant Co., Ltd. is a company specialized in lubricant marketing Lubricant Co., Ltd. has been committed to providing lubrication service for established by China Petrochemical Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Shenzhou” series manned spacecrafts and “Chang’e” series lunar exploration “Sinopec Group”) to meet competition in the international lubricant market. satellites, making great contributions to the development of Chinese aeronautics Sinopec Lubricant Co., Ltd. has 12 lube oil & grease blending and manufacturing and astronautics course. Sinopec’s lubrication products completely satisfy the branches, 5 regional sales centers, 5 regional technical support centers, requirements set by ISO, API, ACEA, etc. 5 provincial sales branches, 3 joint ventures, 1 overseas subsidiary and 9 Keeping pace with the development of off-highway vehicles, Sinopec Lubricant RYHUVHDVRI¿FHVWRJHWKHUZLWKSURGXFW5 'LQVWLWXWHVDQGVWDWHUHFRJQL]HG Co., Ltd. has good cooperation with construction machinery enterprises and ODERUDWRULHV:LWKOHDGLQJLQQRYDWLYHDQG5 'FDSDELOLWLHVDQGZRUOGFODVV production equipments and process technologies, the Company boasts over distinct advantage in off-highway industry. SINOPEC lubricants are extensively 2,000 types of products such as lubricants for internal combustion engine, applied to famous enterprises such as XCMG, ZOOMLION, SANY, Lonking, industrial gear oils, hydraulic oils, greases, antifreezes, brake fluid, metal XGMA and SEM in China. With professional lubricants, Sinopec Lubricant Co., working fluids, Marine oils, lubricant additives, etc. divided in 21 categories, Ltd. -
China at the Gates a New Power Audit of Eu-China Relations
CHINA AT THE GATES A NEW POWER AUDIT OF EU-CHINA RELATIONS François Godement & Abigaël Vasselier ABOUT ECFR The European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) is the first pan-European think-tank. Launched in October 2007, its objective is to conduct research and promote informed debate across Europe on the development of coherent, effective and values- based European foreign policy. ECFR has developed a strategy with three distinctive elements that define its activities: • A pan-European Council. ECFR has brought together a distinguished Council of over two hundred Members - politicians, decision makers, thinkers and business people from the EU’s member states and candidate countries - which meets once a year as a full body. Through geographical and thematic task forces, members provide ECFR staff with advice and feedback on policy ideas and help with ECFR’s activities within their own countries. The Council is chaired by Carl Bildt, Emma Bonino and Mabel van Oranje. • A physical presence in the main EU member states. ECFR, uniquely among European think-tanks, has offices in Berlin, London, Madrid, Paris, Rome, Sofia and Warsaw. Our offices are platforms for research, debate, advocacy and communications. • Developing contagious ideas that get people talking. ECFR has brought together a team of distinguished researchers and practitioners from all over Europe to carry out innovative research and policy development projects with a pan-European focus. ECFR produces original research; publishes policy reports; hosts private meetings, public debates, and “friends of ECFR” gatherings in EU capitals; and reaches out to strategic media outlets. ECFR is a registered charity funded by the Open Society Foundations and other generous foundations, individuals and corporate entities.