Six Stewards of Canada's Economy — History by The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Six Stewards of Canada's Economy — History by The SIX STEWARDS OF CANADA’S ECONOMY — HISTORY BY THE NUMBERS FAVOURS MULRONEY AND CHRÉTIEN, WHILE TRUDEAU LEAVES A LEGACY OF DEFICITS AND DEBT Michael Hart and Bill Dymond Assessing the economic legacy of the six full-term prime ministers of the last half-century is easier done than said. In economic rankings, statistics are more than empirical data, they are objective evidence. Numbers talk. The authors focus on three main criteria: Canada’s performance as a trading nation during each PM’s tenure; the fiscal state of the country at the beginning and end of his time in office; and the “misery index” of inflation, unemployment, exchange rates and economic growth. They conclude that Brian Mulroney, left an economic mess by Pierre Trudeau, had the most challenging economic context of any of the six major prime ministers of the last 50 years, and did the most to improve it. Jean Chrétien also receives high marks for having the good sense to leave free trade and the GST in place, and for having the political courage to rid Canada of its crushing legacy of deficits. Lester Pearson and Louis St-Laurent guided the country through boom times, while John Diefenbaker’s vision did not translate into a good economic performance. Trudeau receives the worst economic scorecard from the authors, both former senior economic officials and authorities on international trade. Évaluer l’héritage économique de six premiers ministres n’est pas une mince affaire. Dans un classement, les statistiques ne sont pas que de simples données empiriques, elles deviennent de véritables preuves objectives; les chiffres parlent. Sur la base du bilan commercial du Canada pendant le mandat de chaque premier ministre ; de l’état des finances du pays au début et à la fin de chacun de leur mandat ; et de « l’indice de misère », combinant inflation, chômage, taux de change et croissance, Michael Hart et Bill Dymond ont accepté de relever ce défi. D’après ces critères, c’est Brian Mulroney qui a hérité de la conjoncture économique la plus difficile, vu l’état désastreux dans lequel Pierre Elliott Trudeau avait laissé les finances publiques, et c’est lui qui a le plus accompli pour améliorer les choses. Jean Chrétien a également reçu d’excellentes notes pour avoir eu la sagesse de maintenir le libre-échange et la TPS, et le courage politique d’en finir avec nos déficits endémiques. Lester B. Pearson et Louis Saint-Laurent ont gouverné en des temps de forte expansion, tandis que John Diefenbaker a échoué à traduire sa vision en une performance économique digne de ce nom. C’est enfin à Pierre Elliott Trudeau que revient la palme du pire bilan économique. ow well did Canada’s most recent major prime and Pearson, and consider it too early to assess Chrétien. ministers do as stewards of Canada’s economic The man in the street would also be wrong. H welfare? What criteria would be appropriate for More than for other prime ministerial legacies, their making such an assessment? The man in the street’s gut feel- economic ones rely on objective criteria. As a relatively ings, fed by popular media perceptions, might be to praise open economy, for example, Canada’s performance as a Trudeau, bury Mulroney, forget St-Laurent, Diefenbaker, trading nation can provide useful insight into a govern- 30 OPTIONS POLITIQUES JUIN-JUILLET 2003 Six stewards of Canada’s economy ment’s economic stewardship. Equally, anced budgets, low inflation, and had begun to enjoy a high and rising the fiscal state of the country at the politically acceptable levels of cyclical standard of living and an increasing beginning and conclusion of a prime unemployment. The overall impact range of government services. For the minister’s period in office can be an was a steady improvement in Canada’s first time in Canadian history, the important indicator. Then there is the economic prospects, a reality well cap- growth in the economy — output rose misery index of inflation and unem- tured by the Final Report of the Royal 64 percent between 1944 and 1957 — ployment levels, as well as such data as Commission on Canada’s Economic had come largely from domestic exchange rates, economic growth, and Prospects in 1958. demand. New investment had risen interest rates. This article focuses on 249 percent while government capital the first three criteria as the major ot everyone agreed that the St- spending during this period had risen pointers to the stewardship of the gov- N Laurent Liberals delivered the by 776 percent. Domestic demand out- ernments of the six most recent full- best possible policy to pursue Canada’s paced foreign demand to the point that term prime ministers, and throws in a economic development. Tory national- exports steadily declined as a percent- few of the other factors where they are ists disliked the individualism of clas- age of GNP. The economy had become helpful in fixing praise or blame. sical liberalism and the continentalism more diversified and capable of provid- When the young Princess that flowed from Canada’s geography. ing Canadians with a growing array of Elizabeth ascended to the throne in They preferred the ties of history, goods and services and with high- 1952, and at the time of her corona- Empire, and sentiment to those of paying jobs. Canada had become more tion in June 1953, her Canadian geography, technology, and economic urbanized and the quality of life, at dominion was firmly under the man- interests. Economic nationalists simi- least materially, had improved with it. agement of the Liberal Party, with larly deplored the US connection be- Canadians could look with satisfaction Louis St-Laurent serving as its manag- cause it tied Canada into the world’s at a government that had delivered the ing director, having taken over the pre-eminent capitalist economy and prosperity it had promised. Looking reins of power upon the retirement of undermined Canada’s ability to act back from the perspective of 2003, we Mackenzie King in 1948. His hold on independently. What they wanted was can appreciate even more the benefits power had been confirmed in the gen- a Canada that could pursue its own Canadians had derived from the mana- eral election of 1949 and would be destiny, often defined as anything but gerial competence of St-Laurent and extended for a further mandate in that of the United States. his colleagues, setting a standard that 1953. This final phase of the long These concerns, however, engaged his successors would find difficult to Liberal hegemony was by 1953 in its only a few. By the middle of the match, let alone surpass. ninteenth year, dating back to 1935. decade, most Canadians had many But political success requires more St-Laurent’s core team consisted of good reasons to be satisfied. Canadians than managerial competence. By the veterans like himself, Douglas Abbott at Finance, Jimmy Gardiner at Agriculture, and the minister of every- CANADA: EXPORTS OF GOODS AND SERVICES thing, C.D. Howe, at Trade and 50 Commerce and Defence Production. It 45 had been enriched by the addition of Lester Pearson at External Affairs. 40 Together, they offered sound, smooth, 35 predictable, and pragmatic gover- nance, carefully matching their own 30 preferences to those of the popular 25 will, broadly considered. of GDP Percent 20 On the trade front, St-Laurent and his ministers and officials expended 15 considerable effort to find the most 10 realistic and workable trade regime, one that opened markets for Canadian 5 agriculture and resource producers but 0 1960 1966 1972 1950 1962 1964 1954 1956 1958 1968 1970 1978 1988 1990 2000 1948 1974 1976 1980 1982 1984 1986 1992 1994 1996 1998 2002 that protected the vulnerable 1952 Canadian manufacturing sector. Their St-Laurent Diefenbaker Pearson Trudeau (Clark) Mulroney Chrétien approach to fiscal policy was similarly Total To USA To Others cautious and pragmatic and brought Source: Statistics Canada, Canada’s International Balance of Payments and unspectacular but positive results: bal- National Income and Expenditure Accounts. POLICY OPTIONS 31 JUNE-JULY 2003 Michael Hart and Bill Dymond mid-1950s there seemed sufficient dis- either Diefenbaker’s anglophilia capital and a precipitous reduction in content to sweep the Grits from office N nor his anti-Americanism, for Canada’s reserve position. and install a minority Tory govern- example, translated into constructive On other economic factors, ment under their new leader, John policies. He had never been shy about Diefenbaker’s record is equally trouble- Diefenbaker, bringing to an end a gov- his dislike of the Americans as a some. While inflation remained low, ernment that had served Canada well nation. Once in office, however, there unemployment increased, aggregate but had become somewhat tired and was continued rhetoric but little seri- growth rates stagnated and the burden of arrogant in the process. In 22 years, ous effort to reduce Canadian depend- government spending increased, as did the Liberals had at one time or anoth- ence on the US market or to reduce US taxes. On the trade front, Diefenbaker er offended a lot of groups, from investment in Canada. Diefenbaker’s exacerbated a number of Canada-US files wheat farmers to anglophiles. Could ministers used the occasion of the first (e.g., the extraterritorial application of US Diefenbaker and his ministers respond meeting of the Joint Canada-US law), missed opportunities at both the to their complaints and do better? Ministerial Committee to express their Dillon Round of GATT negotiations and As it turned out, they could not. desire to try to diversify Canadian in the lead up to the Kennedy Round, In fact, they did worse.
Recommended publications
  • A Calculus of Interest Canadian Peacekeeping Diplomacy in Cyprus, 1963-1993
    Canadian Military History Volume 24 Issue 2 Article 8 2015 A Calculus of Interest Canadian Peacekeeping Diplomacy in Cyprus, 1963-1993 Greg Donaghy Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh Part of the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Greg Donaghy "A Calculus of Interest Canadian Peacekeeping Diplomacy in Cyprus, 1963-1993." Canadian Military History 24, 2 (2015) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Military History by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. : A Calculus of Interest Canadian Peacekeeping Diplomacy in Cyprus, 1963-1993 A Calculus of Interest Canadian Peacekeeping Diplomacy in Cyprus, 1963-1993 GREG DONAGHY Abstract: Fifty years ago, Canadian peacekeepers landed on the small Mediterranean island of Cyprus, where they stayed for thirty long years. This paper uses declassified cabinet papers and diplomatic records to tackle three key questions about this mission: why did Canadians ever go to distant Cyprus? Why did they stay for so long? And why did they leave when they did? The answers situate Canada’s commitment to Cypress against the country’s broader postwar project to preserve world order in an era marked by the collapse of the European empires and the brutal wars in Algeria and Vietnam. It argues that Canada stayed— through fifty-nine troop rotations, 29,000 troops, and twenty-eight dead— because peacekeeping worked. Admittedly there were critics, including Prime Ministers Pearson, Trudeau, and Mulroney, who complained about the failure of peacemaking in Cyprus itself.
    [Show full text]
  • LETTERS Soest, Germany, Pays Unique Civic Here
    « Cairistmas is closing in fast. • These Santa Claus parades Start now and you can stili demonstrate a Board of Trade l>ny aimost anything but more can’t float alone. There must time to buy. The Glengarry New be public interest. ONE OF CANADA’S AWARD-WINNING WEEKLY NEWSPAPERS TOL. LXIX — No. 50 ALEXANDRIA, ONTARIO, THURSDAY, DECEMBER 15th, 1960 SINGLE COPY lOo Federation Of Agriculture Hears Loot Recovered In Santa’s Bag Not Address On Land Acquisition Montreal From Big Enough A talk by Don Middleton on Land privileges of an owner of property Area Burglary Santa Claus come in by plane, Acquisition and the policies of the (1) he pays the taxes; (2) he can Saturday, but it was not due to rederation of Agriculture for this use the property as he sees fit; (3) Three Montreal men are in jkil weight restrictions on his luggage subject, featured the annual meet- he can mortgage it; (4) he' can will, In Cornw'all and will appear' in court that the treats ran short. Some j ing of the County Federation which sell or deed it. here Tuesday to face charges in 1700 bags of goodies were dished out ■was held in the High School here Regarding the same property the connection -with the theft of some but Santa found himself short — «n Thursday night last. Mr., Mid- state can: (1) tax it; (2) police it; $800 worth of goods from the shop about 65 treats when it cam( linn dleton is head of the newly created (3) can take part of it; (4) can of Aime Fillon at Apple Hill.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rhetoric of Trade and the Pragmatism of Policy: Canadian and New Zealand Commercial Relations with Britain, 1920-1950 Francine Mckenzie [email protected]
    Western University Scholarship@Western History Publications History Department 2010 The Rhetoric of Trade and the Pragmatism of Policy: Canadian and New Zealand Commercial Relations with Britain, 1920-1950 Francine McKenzie [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/historypub Part of the History Commons Citation of this paper: McKenzie, Francine, "The Rhetoric of Trade and the Pragmatism of Policy: Canadian and New Zealand Commercial Relations with Britain, 1920-1950" (2010). History Publications. 390. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/historypub/390 THE RHETORIC OF TRADE AND THE PRAGMATISM OF POLICY: CANADIAN AND NEW ZEALAND COMMERCIAL RELATIONS WITH BRITAIN, 1920-1950 Francine McKenzie Department of History The University of Western Ontario INTRODUCTION In April 1948 Prime Minister Mackenzie King pulled Canada out of secret free trade negotiations with the United States. Although many officials in the Department of External Affairs believed that a continental free trade agreement was in Canada’s best interests, King confided to his diary that he could not let the negotiations go forward because a successful outcome would destroy the British Empire and Commonwealth: ‘I am sure in so doing, I have made one of the most important decisions for Canada, for the British Commonwealth of Nations that has been made at any time.’1 In October 1949, while being fêted in London, Prime Minister Sydney Holland of New Zealand, made one of his characteristic spontaneous and ill considered statements. He declared, ‘I want the people of Britain to know that we will send all the food that they need, even if we have to send it free’.2 These two stories tell historians a lot.
    [Show full text]
  • PART III.—REGISTER of OFFICIAL APPOINTMENTS* the Following List Includes Official Appointments for the Period Sept
    1164 MISCELLANEOUS DATA PART III.—REGISTER OF OFFICIAL APPOINTMENTS* The following list includes official appointments for the period Sept. 1, 1962 to Nov. 15, 1963, continuing the list published in the 1962 Year Book at pp. 1176-1181. Appointments to the Governor General's staff, judicial appointments other than those to the Supreme Court of Canada, and appointments of limited or local importance are not included. Queen's Privy Council for Canada.—1962. Oct. 15, Mark Robert Drouin, Sillery, Que.; and Roland Michener, Toronto, Ont.: to be members. Dec. 21, Rt. Hon. John George Diefenbaker, Prime Minister of Canada: to be President. 1963. Feb. 12, Marcel- Joseph-Aime Lambert, Edmonton, Alta.: to be a member. Feb. 20, Major-General Georges P. Vanier, Governor General of Canada: to be a member. Mar. 18, J.-H. Theogene Ricard, St. Hyacinthe, Que.; Frank Charles McGee, Don Mills, Ont.; and Martial Asselin, La Malbaie, Que.: to be members. Apr. 22, Walter Lockhart Gordon, Toronto, Ont.; Mitchell Sharp, Toronto, Ont.; Azellus Denis, Montreal, Que.; George James Mcllraith, Ottawa, Ont.; William Moore Benidickson, Kenora, Ont.; Arthur Laing, Vancouver, B.C.; John Richard Garland, North Bay, Ont.; Lucien Cardin, Sorel, Que.; Allan Joseph Mac- Eachen, Inverness, N.S.; Jean-Paul Deschatelets, Montreal, Que.; Hedard Robichaud, Caraquet, N.B.; J. Watson MacNaught, Summerside, P.E.I.; Roger Teillet, St. Boniface, Man.; Miss Judy LaMarsh, Niagara Falls, Ont.; Charles Mills Drury, Westmount, Que.; Guy Favreau, Montreal, Que.; John Robert Nicholson, Vancouver, B.C.; Harry Hays, Calgary, Alta.; Rene Tremblay, Quebec, Que.; and Maurice Lamontagne, Montreal, Que.: to be members, Maurice Lamontagne to be also President.
    [Show full text]
  • Time Allocation in the House of Commons T
    Silencing Parliamentary Democracy or Effective Time Management? Time Allocation in the House of Commons by Yves Yvon J. Pelletier 2000 CanLIIDocs 228 Is "time allocation" the best means by which to silence the opposition or does it allow rather for effective time management in the House of Commons? In 1969, the Trudeau government adopted, not without a vigorous reaction from opposition parties, a new procedure that allotted a certain period of time for a debate, reducing the use of closure. Despite promises that this measure would never be used, 150 time allocation motions were adopted by the House of Commons since December 1971. This article analyses the context in which time allocation was adopted and determines which government has used it most often. he centralization of political powers in the hands of of time could be allocated for debate. The partisan Tsenior management within the office of the Prime position when this measure was adopted did not prevent Minister and the central agencies of the federal its use by all federal govemments since 1971, on 163 government cannot alone account for the reduction in the occasions. This article examines the decline of the legislative role of Canadian Parliamentarians. In fact, legislative role of MPs as the result of time allocation and changes to the Standing Orders of the House of determines which government, from Trudeau to Commons by its members over the years have limited the Chrétien, have made most frequent use of it in terms of opportunities of private members to influence the final the number of seats held by the government, sitting days wording of government bills.
    [Show full text]
  • What Has He Really Done Wrong?
    The Chrétien legacy Canada was in such a state that it WHAT HAS HE REALLY elected Brian Mulroney. By this stan- dard, William Lyon Mackenzie King DONE WRONG? easily turned out to be our best prime minister. In 1921, he inherited a Desmond Morton deeply divided country, a treasury near ruin because of over-expansion of rail- ways, and an economy gripped by a brutal depression. By 1948, Canada had emerged unscathed, enriched and almost undivided from the war into spent last summer’s dismal August Canadian Pension Commission. In a the durable prosperity that bred our revising a book called A Short few days of nimble invention, Bennett Baby Boom generation. Who cared if I History of Canada and staring rescued veterans’ benefits from 15 King had halitosis and a professorial across Lake Memphrémagog at the years of political logrolling and talent for boring audiences? astonishing architecture of the Abbaye launched a half century of relatively St-Benoît. Brief as it is, the Short History just and generous dealing. Did anyone ll of which is a lengthy prelude to tries to cover the whole 12,000 years of notice? Do similar achievements lie to A passing premature and imperfect Canadian history but, since most buy- the credit of Jean Chrétien or, for that judgement on Jean Chrétien. Using ers prefer their own life’s history to a matter, Brian Mulroney or Pierre Elliott the same criteria that put King first more extensive past, Jean Chrétien’s Trudeau? Dependent on the media, and Trudeau deep in the pack, where last seven years will get about as much the Opposition and government prop- does Chrétien stand? In 1993, most space as the First Nations’ first dozen aganda, what do I know? Do I refuse to Canadians were still caught in the millennia.
    [Show full text]
  • 1866 (C) Circa 1510 (A) 1863
    BONUS : Paintings together with their year of completion. (A) 1863 (B) 1866 (C) circa 1510 Vancouver Estival Trivia Open, 2012, FARSIDE team BONUS : Federal cabinet ministers, 1940 to 1990 (A) (B) (C) (D) Norman Rogers James Ralston Ernest Lapointe Joseph-Enoil Michaud James Ralston Mackenzie King James Ilsley Louis St. Laurent 1940s Andrew McNaughton 1940s Douglas Abbott Louis St. Laurent James Ilsley Louis St. Laurent Brooke Claxton Douglas Abbott Lester Pearson Stuart Garson 1950s 1950s Ralph Campney Walter Harris John Diefenbaker George Pearkes Sidney Smith Davie Fulton Donald Fleming Douglas Harkness Howard Green Donald Fleming George Nowlan Gordon Churchill Lionel Chevrier Guy Favreau Walter Gordon 1960s Paul Hellyer 1960s Paul Martin Lucien Cardin Mitchell Sharp Pierre Trudeau Leo Cadieux John Turner Edgar Benson Donald Macdonald Mitchell Sharp Edgar Benson Otto Lang John Turner James Richardson 1970s Allan MacEachen 1970s Ron Basford Donald Macdonald Don Jamieson Barney Danson Otto Lang Jean Chretien Allan McKinnon Flora MacDonald JacquesMarc Lalonde Flynn John Crosbie Gilles Lamontagne Mark MacGuigan Jean Chretien Allan MacEachen JeanJacques Blais Allan MacEachen Mark MacGuigan Marc Lalonde Robert Coates Jean Chretien Donald Johnston 1980s Erik Nielsen John Crosbie 1980s Perrin Beatty Joe Clark Ray Hnatyshyn Michael Wilson Bill McKnight Doug Lewis BONUS : Name these plays by Oscar Wilde, for 10 points each. You have 30 seconds. (A) THE PAGE OF HERODIAS: Look at the moon! How strange the moon seems! She is like a woman rising from a tomb. She is like a dead woman. You would fancy she was looking for dead things. THE YOUNG SYRIAN: She has a strange look.
    [Show full text]
  • Collection: Green, Max: Files Box: 42
    Ronald Reagan Presidential Library Digital Library Collections This is a PDF of a folder from our textual collections. Collection: Green, Max: Files Folder Title: Briefing International Council of the World Conference on Soviet Jewry 05/12/1988 Box: 42 To see more digitized collections visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digital-library To see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/document-collection Contact a reference archivist at: [email protected] Citation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/citing National Archives Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/ WITHDRAWAL SHEET Ronald Reagan Library Collection Name GREEN, MAX: FILES Withdrawer MID 11/23/2001 File Folder BRIEFING INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL & THE WORLD FOIA CONFERENCE ON SOVIET JEWRY 5/12/88 F03-0020/06 Box Number THOMAS 127 DOC Doc Type Document Description No of Doc Date Restrictions NO Pages 1 NOTES RE PARTICIPANTS 1 ND B6 2 FORM REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENTS 1 5/11/1988 B6 Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)] B-1 National security classified Information [(b)(1) of the FOIA) B-2 Release would disclose Internal personnel rules and practices of an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA) B-3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA) B-4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial Information [(b)(4) of the FOIA) B-8 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted Invasion of personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA) B-7 Release would disclose Information compiled for law enforcement purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA) B-8 Release would disclose Information concerning the regulation of financial Institutions [(b)(B) of the FOIA) B-9 Release would disclose geological or geophysical Information concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA) C.
    [Show full text]
  • NAFTA at 10: 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004-3027 Progress, Potential, and Precedents
    ecedents NAFTA at 10: NAFTA ess, Potential, and Pr ogr Pr NAFTA at 10: Progress, Potential, and Precedents www.wilsoncenter.org Washington, DC 20004-3027 Washington, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, One Woodrow Wilson Plaza One Woodrow CENTER FOR SCHOLARS THE WOODROW WILSON INTERNATIONAL THE WOODROW WILSON INTERNATIONAL NAFTA AT 10: YESTERDAY, TODAY, AND TOMORROW Lessons Learned and Unmet Challenges Volume One Conference Proceedings Canada Institute Latin American Program Project on America and the Global Economy NAFTA AT 10: YESTERDAY, TODAY, AND TOMORROW Lessons Learned and Unmet Challenges Volume One Conference Proceedings ©2005 Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, D.C. www.wilsoncenter.org WOODROW WILSON INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR SCHOLARS LEE H. HAMILTON, PRESIDENT AND DIRECTOR CONTENTS BOARD OF TRUSTEES Joseph B. Gildenhorn, Chair David A. Metzner, Vice Chair Acknowledgements vii Public Members: James H. Billington, Librarian of Congress; Allen Preface ix Weinstein, Archivist of the United States; Bruce Cole, Chair, National Endowment for the Humanities; Michael O. Leavitt, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Condoleezza Rice, Secretary, Conference Summary xiii U.S. Department of State; Lawrence M. Small, Secretary, Smithsonian Institution; Margaret Spellings, Secretary, U.S. Department of Education. NAFTA at 10 Conference Agenda xvii Designated Appointee of the President from Within the Federal Government: Tamala L. Longaberger PANEL 11 NAFTA at 10: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow— Private Citizen Members: Carol Cartwright, Robin B. Cook, Donald E. Garcia, Lessons Learned and Unmet Challenges Bruce S. Gelb, Sander R. Gerber, Charles L. Glazer, Ignacio Sanchez PANEL 27 Future Directions for NAFTA: The Possibility of Closer Economic, Political, and Social Ties ABOUT THE CENTER The Center is the living memorial of the United States of America to the nation’s twenty-eighth president, Woodrow Wilson.
    [Show full text]
  • Engaging Iran Australian and Canadian Relations with the Islamic Republic Engaging Iran Australian and Canadian Relations with the Islamic Republic
    Engaging Iran Australian and Canadian Relations with the Islamic Republic Engaging Iran Australian and Canadian Relations with the Islamic Republic Robert J. Bookmiller Gulf Research Center i_m(#ÆAk pA'v@uB Dubai, United Arab Emirates (_}A' !_g B/9lu( s{4'1q {xA' 1_{4 b|5 )smdA'c (uA'f'1_B%­'=¡(/ *_D |w@_> TBMFT!HSDBF¡CEudA'sGu( XXXHSDBFeCudC­'?B uG_GAE#­'c`}A' i_m(#ÆAk pA'v@uB9f1s{5 )smdA'c (uA'f'1_B%­'cAE/ i_m(#ÆAk pA'v@uBª E#'Gvp*E#'B!v,¢#'E#'1's{5%­''tDu{xC)/_9%_(n{wGL­i_m(#ÆAk pA'v@uAc8mBmA' , ¡dA'E#'c>EuA'&_{3A'B¢#'c}{3'(E#'c j{w*E#'cGuG{y*E#'c A"'E#'c CEudA%'eC_@c {3EE#'{4¢#_(9_,ud{3' i_m(#ÆAk pA'v@uBB`{wB¡}.0%'9{ymA'E/B`d{wA'¡>ismd{wd{3 *4#/b_dA{w{wdA'¡A_A'?uA' k pA'v@uBuCc,E9)1Eu{zA_(u`*­E @1_{xA'!'1"'9u`*1's{5%­''tD¡>)/1'==A'uA'f_,E i_m(#ÆA Gulf Research Center 187 Oud Metha Tower, 11th Floor, 303 Sheikh Rashid Road, P. O. Box 80758, Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Tel.: +971 4 324 7770 Fax: +971 3 324 7771 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.grc.ae First published 2009 i_m(#ÆAk pA'v@uB Gulf Research Center (_}A' !_g B/9lu( Dubai, United Arab Emirates s{4'1q {xA' 1_{4 b|5 )smdA'c (uA'f'1_B%­'=¡(/ © Gulf Research Center 2009 *_D All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in |w@_> a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, TBMFT!HSDBF¡CEudA'sGu( XXXHSDBFeCudC­'?B mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the Gulf Research Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Fa.Wpd
    Manuscript Division des Division manuscrits THE RT. HON. JOE CLARK FONDS FONDS DU TRÈS HONORABLE JOE CLARK MG 26 R Finding Aid No. 2076 / Instrument de recherche no 2076 Prepared in 1999 by Grace Hyam of the Préparé en 1999 par Grace Hyam de la Political Archival Section. Section des archives politique. Table of Contents File lists, by series and sub-series: Pages R 1 MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT SERIES R 1-1 Member of Parliament, 1972-1976, Correspondence Sub-series .......... 1-22 R 1-2 Member of Parliament, 1972-1976, Subject files Sub-series ............ 23-45 R 1-3 Member of Parliament, 1983-1984, Sub-series ....................... 46-51 R 2 LEADER OF THE OPPOSITION, 1976-1979, SERIES R 2-1 Correspondence Sub-series ............................... 52-264 R 2-2 Subject Files Sub-series................................. 265-282 R 2-3 Staff - Jim Hawkes Sub-series............................ 283-294 R 2-4 Joe Clark Personal Sub-series ............................ 295-296 R 2-5 Staff - Ian Green Sub-series.............................. 297-301 R 2-6 Staff - Bill Neville Sub-series ............................ 302-304 R 3 PRIME MINISTER’S OFFICE SERIES R 3-1 PMO Correspondence Sub-series ......................... 305-321 R 3-2 PMO Correspondence - Indexes Sub-series ................. 322-323 R 3-3 PMO Subject files Sub-series ............................ 324-331 R 3-4 PMO Staff - Lorne Fox Sub-series ........................ 332-335 R 3-5 PMO Staff - Adèle Desjardins Sub-series................... 336-338 R 3-6 PMO Staff - Marjory LeBreton Sub-series .................. 339-341 R 3-7 PMO Communications Sub-series......................... 342-348 R 4 LEADER OF THE OPPOSITION, 1980-1983, SERIES R 4-1 Correspondence Sub-series .............................
    [Show full text]
  • Canada's Policy Towards Communist China, 1949-1971
    Lakehead University Knowledge Commons,http://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca Electronic Theses and Dissertations Electronic Theses and Dissertations from 2009 2014-01-22 Canada's policy towards Communist China, 1949-1971 Holomego, Kyle http://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca/handle/2453/494 Downloaded from Lakehead University, KnowledgeCommons CANADA’S POLICY TOWARDS COMMUNIST CHINA, 1949-1971 by Kyle Holomego A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of History Lakehead University December 2012 1 Abstract The decision of the Canadian government in 1970 to recognize the People’s Republic of China, which controlled Mainland China, as the official government of China, as opposed to the Republic of China, which only controlled Taiwan, was the end result of a process lasting more than two decades. In that time frame, Canada’s China policy would undergo many different shifts. A close examination shows that these shifts were closely linked to the shifting attitudes of successive Canadian leaders. Four different prime ministers would serve in office during Canada’s recognition process, and the inauguration of each prime minister signaled a shift in Canada’s China policy. The issue of recognizing the People’s Republic of China was intertwined with several other issues that were important to Canada. Among these were the economic potential of China, Canada’s need for collective agreements to ensure its security, the desire of the United States to influence Canadian policy, and the desire of Canadian officials to demonstrate the independence of Canadian policy. Of the four prime ministers, three – Louis St.
    [Show full text]