DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report 2017 Rosenergoatom 4 — 5

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Report 2017 Rosenergoatom 4 — 5 SAFE ENERGY SOURCE INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES ANNUAL SUSTAINABLE ENERGY SUPPLY REPORT 2017 FOR ALL CONTENTS Business Geography 2 2.5 Contribution to Russian Digital Economy. APPENDICES 208 Appendix 10. Information Technology 102 Auditor’s Report Certifying Annual Appendix 1. Accounting Statements 258 Key Performance Indicators in 2015-2017 International Sci-Tech Cooperation 4 2.6 108 About Annual Report.Material Aspects 210 2.7 International Business and New Products 112 Appendix 11. Key Events of 2017 8 Appendix 2. Report on Rosenergoatom’s Compliance with Corporate Corporate and Contact Details 214 Governance Code Recommended by the Bank of Russia 261 03. Sustainability Management 121 Address by Board of Directors Chairman Financial Stability 13 3.1 123 Appendix 3. Appendix 12. 3.2 Investment Program 130 GRI, RSPP Content Index 215 Operating NPP Power Units 270 Address by CEO 14 3.3 Environmental Impact 132 Appendix 4. Appendix 13. 3.4 Radiation Effect Table on Consideration of Suggestions Installed Capacity and Power Output of Nuclear Overview on Personnel and Population 140 01. 17 by Stakeholders 231 Power Plants of Rosenergoatom in 2015-2017 1.1 General Information 20 3.5 HR Policy 147 by Russian UES 271 1.2 Mission, Vision and Values 23 3.6 Labor Protection 157 Appendix 5. System of Public Reporting Indicators Appendix 14. 1.3 Value Creation 24 3.7 Social Policy. at Rosenergoatom 237 Main Personnel Characteristics 272 1.4 Strategic Goals and Objectives 29 Developing Areas of Presence. Charity 161 1.5 Risk Management 34 Appendix 6. Appendix 15. 1.6 Sustainable Development Goals 38 04. Operating Efficiency 169 Public Assurance Statement 242 Glossary 274 4.1 Corporate Governance 171 Appendix 7. Appendix 16. Technological Leadership and Innovations Economic Security 02. 43 4.2 188 Non-Financial Audit Report 245 Abbreviations 277 2.1 Situation in Power Sector 45 4.3 Internal Control and Auditing 190 2.2 Generating Capacities. 4.4 Property Management 194 Appendix 8. Appendix 17. Report of Internal ControlDepartment Rosenergoatom Historical Background 278 Developing Generating Potential 52 4.5 Purchase Management 195 of Rosenergoatom 248 Ensuring Safety of Russian NPPs Quality Assurance 2.3 84 4.6 197 Appendix 18. 2.4 Innovations. Sci-Tech Policy. Knowledge 4.7 Interaction with Stakeholders 201 Appendix 9. Feedback Form 279 Management System 90 4.8 Public Reporting System 206 Accounting (Financial) Statements 249 48Business Geography osenergoato onern Annual esus report o 2017 49Rosenergoatom osenergoato onern esus2 o 2017— 3 102-4 102-6 BUSINESS GEOGRAPHY 1 27.9 GW — FLOATING NUCLEAR POWER PLANT RUSSIA’S NUMBER ONE insae apaiy o s BILIBINO NPP poer prouer G KOLA NPP BALTIC NPP VVER-440 2 VVER-1200 LENINGRAD NPP B-1000 THE WORLD’S NUMBER TWO VVER-1200 poer prouer an insae apaiy oner KALININ NPP SMOLENSK NPP ROSENERGOATOM, VVER-1000 JOINT-STOCK COMPANY B-1000 is a largest power generating NOVOVORONEZH NPP company in Russia and the VVER-440 country’s only operator of Russian KURSK NPP VVER-1000 nuclear power plants. B-1000 VVER-1200 VVER-210 VVER-TOI VVER-365 VVER-440 202.87 ROSTOV NPP BALAKOVO NPP BELOYARSK NPP BLN KWH — poer generaion in 1000 VVER-1000 B 2017 1000 B B B 10 REGIONS o operaing POWER UNITS PERCENT SHARE IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ENERGY BALANCE 18.9% 35 6 2 2 3 PERCENT CAPACITY FACTOR n operaion uner onsruion hysia sarup eois uner an oaing in 2017 sioning shuon 83.3% Key Performance Indicators in 2015-2017 Annual report 2017 Rosenergoatom 4 — 5 102-7 KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS IN 2015-2017 202.87 360,386 BLN KWH — MLN RUBLES — poer generaton n 2017 revenue n 2017 AAT FATR % 10 RR ATA R 100 mln rules actual 2017 83.29 2017 793,123 plan 2017 82.1 2016 793,123 2016 83.1 2015 671,517 2015 85.95 R RA KWH ln kWh R R 10 ln Rules 195.2 196.4 199.841 202.87 263,757 282,036 360,386 2015 2016 plan 2017 actual 2017 2015 2016 2017 1e FA alane target poer generaton as spee as te planne nator. Key Performance Indicators in 2015-2017 Annual report 2017 Rosenergoatom 6 — 7 ARA AT R INVESTMENT EQUITY EBITDA MAR % CHARTA CONR ARA A MA TA AR T BUDGETS1 R R R 18,169 21,986 32,847 2017 33,8861 2017 115,097.02 2017 46.7 2017 505 2015 2016 2017 35,248 117,767.9 37.0 505.5 2016 35,394 2016 128,975.1 2016 41.0 2016 498 Feeral uget ugets o te Russan Feeraton oal ugets Personal nome ta onsttuent enttes 2015 37,179 2015 121,932.6 2015 51.3 2015 565 2017 14,878 2017 13,387 2017 63 2017 4,519 2016 8,203 2016 9,264 2016 56 2016 4,463 2015 6,504 2015 7,125 2015 139 2015 4,401 n aton transerre n avor o Atomenergoprom a responsle partpant n te onsolate group o tapayers atual LAR RTIVIT A VA R NE RT R NE A VA R TOTA VOL R TA FR R OF RI A R RT R plan RRA PAT AR PAT RR R 2017 10.64 2017 1,741,657 2017 45,981 2017 1,509,615 2017 15,401 2017 9,375 2017 152,730 2016 7.97 2016 1,614,094 2016 10,605 2016 1,389,225 2016 1,033 2016 6,891 2016 105,583 2015 7.09 2015 1,470,670 2015 13,922 2015 1,298,091 2015 5,215 2015 6,237 2015 103,616 1 normaton aout te reasons or a erease n te eaount ma e oun n eton R Pol. 1 Amount o taes pa mnus ta reuns rom ugets 2 Fullment o Rosenergoatom nestment program or 2017 b as reers to nestment n eut s relate to diverson o te nestment resoure tat as earler planne or nestment n eut repament o te prnpal amount o te loan or optmaton o epenses or repament o nterest on loans Key Events of 2017 Annual report 2017 Rosenergoatom 8 — 9 102-10 KEY EVENTS OF 2017 th 25 The Rostov NPP hosted a Rosenergoatom celebrated its large-scale emergency drill th 1. 25 anniversary complex involving observers from six countries, the NPP The Balakovo NPP obtained Rosenergoatom Competence emergency response team the license from Rostekhnad- The 1st loop of the Academi- Novovoronezh NPP-2 power unit Center for APCS Cybersecurity at (NPP ERT), Russian Emercom, zor for the power unit No.2 cian Lomonosov floating pow- No.1 with VVER-1200 reactor was Nuclear Power Plants was estab- Defense Ministry and National operation during an additional er unit reactors was washed put into commercial operation. lished on the basis of VNIIAES. Guard. 26-year period. out. FEBRUARY 27 APRIL SEPTEMBER 7 SEPTEMBER 20-22 OCTOBER OCTOBER 01.01.2017 01.10.2017 MARCH 28-31 JUNE AUGUST AUGUST 10 – SEPTEMBER 10 SEPTEMBER 30 OCTOBER Ekaterinburg hosted the first The Best Russian NPP corporate In support of the international The Multimedia Art Museum (Mos- The Smolensk NPP started The Beloyarsk NPP employees championship of vocational contest results were summa- contracts implemented by cow) held a photo exhibition of the producing cobalt isotope as part of the author team re- skills among the employees of rized. Year 2016 title was won Rosatom State Corporation, world’s two leading nuclear power Co-60 (the first extra cobalt ceived the Russian Federation Rosatom’s power engineering by the Balakovo NPP. Among top a decision was made to create producers – Rosenergoatom and absorber was loaded into the Government Sci-Tech Award division – REASkills 2017. three were the Kursk (number a single educational center – Electricite de France (France). The reactor of the power for improving the efficiency Competitions were also held two) and Beloyarsk (number Rosatom Technical Academy exhibition was devoted to the 25th unit No.1). of the fast neutron reactor in Sosnovy Bor and Novovor- three) NPPs. within the power engineering anniversary of Rosenergoatom. operation, development and onezh. division structure. life extension. 1. Further details of Rosenergoatom history may be found on the official website http://www.rosenergoatom.ru/en/about-us/history/, and in the 2016 Annual Report – 25 Years of Safe Operation (http://report2016.rosenergoatom.ru/#/en/) Key Events of 2017 Annual report 2017 Rosenergoatom 10 — 11 102-10 KEY EVENTS OF 2017 1 2 2 Vladimir Putin, President of the The Smolensk NPP started First criticality (nuclear fuel Russian Federation, gave start Employees of the Rostov transferring spent nuclear fuel loading into the reactor) at the 200 to the program of bringing the and Kola NPPs became gold to dry storage – the first spent Rostov NPP power unit No.4 Russian nuclear plants Rostov NPP power unit No.4 and silver prize winners at fuel assembly was disman- started at 7:53 PM (Moscow surpassed the power output to design capacity (power WorldSkills Hi-Tech 2017. tled. time). level of 200 bln kWh. start-up). NOVEMBER DECEMBER DECEMBER 6 DECEMBER 27 FEBRUARY 1 09.03.2018 01.11.2017 01.01.2018 NOVEMBER NOVEMBER 30 DECEMBER 6 DECEMBER 8 JANUARY 20 MARCH 9 The POWER Magazine named The IAEA Operational Safety The Rostov NPP became the First criticality at the Lenin- The Leningrad NPP demon- The innovative power unit the innovative power unit No.1 Review Team (OSART) praised winner of the corporate safety grad NPP-2 power unit No.1 strated a record high power No.1 pertaining to Genera- of the Novovoronezh NPP-2 the Leningrad NPP efforts culture contest in 2017.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Survey of Design and Regulatory Requirements for New Small Reactors, Contract No
    Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission - R550.1 Survey of Design and Regulatory Requirements for New Small Reactors, Contract No. 87055-13-0356 Final Report - July 3, 2014 RSP-0299 Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission R550.1 Survey of Design and Regulatory Requirements for New Small Reactors, Contract No. 87055-13-0356 Final Report July 3, Released for Brian Gihm 0 Victor Snell Jim Sarvinis Milan Ducic 2014 Use Victor Snell Date Rev. Status Prepared By Checked By Approved By Approved By Client - CNSC H346105-0000-00-124-0002, Rev. 0 Page i © Hatch 2015 All rights reserved, including all rights relating to the use of this document or its contents. Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission - R550.1 Survey of Design and Regulatory Requirements for New Small Reactors, Contract No. 87055-13-0356 Final Report - July 3, 2014 Executive Summary The objectives of this report are to perform a design survey of small modular reactors (SMRs) with near-term deployment potential, with a particular emphasis on identifying their innovative safety features, and to review the Canadian nuclear regulatory framework to assess whether the current and proposed regulatory documents adequately address SMR licensing challenges. SMRs are being designed to lower the initial financing cost of a nuclear power plant or to supply electricity in small grids (often in remote areas) which cannot accommodate large nuclear power plants (NPPs). The majority of the advanced SMR designs is based on pressurized water reactor (PWR) technology, while some non-PWR Generation IV technologies (e.g., gas-cooled reactor, lead-cooled reactor, sodium-cooled fast reactor, etc.) are also being pursued.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012/054167 Al
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date _ . 26 April 2012 (26.04.2012) 2012/054167 Al (51) International Patent Classification: (74) Agent: SEYMOUR, Michael, J.; Babcock & Wilcox G21C 3/334 (2006.01) G21C 3/32 (2006.01) Nuclear Energy, Inc., Law Dept - Intellectual Property, 20 South Van Buren Avenue, Barberton, OH 44203 (US). (21) International Application Number: PCT/US201 1/052495 (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, (22) International Filing Date: AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BR, BW, BY, BZ, 2 1 September 201 1 (21 .09.201 1) CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO, (25) Filing Language: English DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, (26) Publication Language: English KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, (30) Priority Data: ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, 12/909,252 2 1 October 2010 (21 .10.2010) US NO, NZ, OM, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, (71) Applicant (for all designated States except US): BAB- TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, COCK & WILCOX NUCLEAR ENERGY, INC. [US/ ZM, ZW. US]; 800 Main Street, Lynchburg, VA 24504 (US).
    [Show full text]
  • Report of JSC Atomenergomash
    JSC ATOMENERGOMASH 2016 INTEGRATED ANNUAL REPORT ar2016.aem-group.ru JSC Atomenergomash provides access to the integrated interactive version of the annual report for 2016 for its stakeholders. This product allows easy information presentation of the main annual results of the Company, as well as the access to additional data, which was not included in the print version in a analysis-friendly format. i – Links to online version GRI – GRI indicators Approved by the Board of Directors on May 26, 2017 Preliminarily approved by the Chief Executive Officer on May 19, 2017 Chief Executive Officer Andrey Nikipelov JSC ATOMENERGOMASH THE COMPANY IN BRIEF Contents 10 YEARS OF PROGRESS ............................................................................................................................4 THE COMPANY IN BRIEF ..............................................................................................................................6 6. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ...................................................................................................................66 2016 PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS ............................................................................................................8 6.1. Ecological management ................................................................................................................................................................................................66 6.2. Emissions and Wastes .....................................................................................................................................................................................................70
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report JSC CONCERN ROSENERGOATOM for 2009
    Annual Report JSC CONCERN ROSENERGOATOM FOR 2009 Safety Effi ciency Responsibility Safety Effi ciency Responsibility JSC Concern Rosenergoatom Annual report for 2009 Content I. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Preamble 7 1.1. On the Annual Report 7 2. Statements of top management of Rosenergoatom 8 2.1. Statement of the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Rosenergoatom 8 2.2. Statement of the General Director of Rosenergoatom 9 3. General information on Rosenergoatom 10 4. Key corporate events in 2009 11 5. Mission of Rosenergoatom 13 6. Management 13 6.1. Management structure 13 6.2. Management methods and corporate policy 24 II. CORE BUSINESS 7. Strategy 29 7.1. Positions of Rosenergoatom within the industry 29 7.2. Strategy of Rosenergoatom 30 7.3. Rosenergoatom’s medium-term development objectives and tasks (2009–2011) 30 7.4. Key performance indicators of Rosenergoatom 31 7.5. Key risks associated with Rosenergoatom’s operations 31 8. Rosenergoatom. Facts and fi gures 32 8.1. Generating capacities of Rosenergoatom 34 8.2. Electricity generation at Russian NPPs 44 8.3. Maintenance and repairs 45 8.4. Lifetime extension of NPP units 46 8.5. Production growth program 46 8.6. Construction of new power units 47 9. Priority areas of operations of Rosenergoatom 49 9.1. Production and marketing activities of Rosenergoatom 49 9.2. Investments 50 9.3. Innovation and competitive growth 50 III. CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY 10. Safety 53 10.1. Safety indicators 53 10.2. Ensuring nuclear and radiation safety and non-proliferation of nuclear materials 55 4 JSC Concern Rosenergoatom 10.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Analysis of a Nuclear Reactor Core for Innovative Small Light Water Reactors
    0 Department of Nuclear Engineering And Radiation Health Physics DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF A NUCLEAR REACTOR CORE FOR INNOVATIVE SMALL LIGHT WATER REACTORS. By Alexey I. Soldatov A DISSERTATION Submitted to Oregon State University March 9, 2009 1 AN ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION OF Alexey I. Soldatov for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Nuclear Engineering presented on March 9, 2009. Title: Design and Analysis of a Nuclear Reactor Core for Innovative Small Light Water Reactors. Abstract approved: Todd S. Palmer In order to address the energy needs of developing countries and remote communities, Oregon State University has proposed the Multi-Application Small Light Water Reactor (MASLWR) design. In order to achieve five years of operation without refueling, use of 8% enriched fuel is necessary. This dissertation is focused on core design issues related with increased fuel enrichment (8.0%) and specific MASLWR operational conditions (such as lower operational pressure and temperature, and increased leakage due to small core). Neutron physics calculations are performed with the commercial nuclear industry tools CASMO-4 and SIMULATE-3, developed by Studsvik Scandpower Inc. The first set of results are generated from infinite lattice level calculations with CASMO-4, and focus on evaluation of the principal differences between standard PWR fuel and MASLWR fuel. Chapter 4-1 covers aspects of fuel isotopic composition changes with burnup, evaluation of kinetic parameters and reactivity coefficients. Chapter 4-2 discusses gadolinium self-shielding and shadowing effects, and subsequent impacts on power generation peaking and Reactor Control System shadowing. 2 The second aspect of the research is dedicated to core design issues, such as reflector design (chapter 4-3), burnable absorber distribution and programmed fuel burnup and fuel use strategy (chapter 4-4).
    [Show full text]
  • Economic and Social Council
    UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. GENERAL Council ECE/MP.WAT/2006/16/Add.6 18 October 2006 Original: ENGLISH ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE MEETING OF THE PARTIES TO THE CONVENTION ON THE PROTECTION AND USE OF TRANSBOUNDARY WATERCOURSES AND INTERNATIONAL LAKES Fourth meeting Bonn (Germany), 20–22 November 2006 Item 7 (e) of the provisional agenda PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF TRANSBOUNDARY RIVERS IN EASTERN EUROPE AND THE CAUCASUS DISCHARGING INTO THE BLACK SEA AND THEIR MAJOR TRANSBOUNDARY TRIBUTARIES Submitted by the Chairperson of the Working Group on Monitoring and Assessment Addendum 1. This preliminary assessment is an intermediate product that deals with major transboundary rivers discharging from Eastern Europe and the Caucasus into the Black Sea and some of their transboundary tributaries. 2. Based on the countries’ responses to the datasheets 1 and data available from other sources, only a very limited number of watercourses have been dealt with so far as shown in the table below. The other watercourses will be included in the updated version to be submitted to the sixth Ministerial Conference “Environment for Europe” (Belgrade, October 2007). This update will also cover other transboundary rivers discharging into the Black Sea (e.g. Rezvaya, Velaka, Danube, Siret and Delta-Liman) and their major transboundary tributaries. 1 The cut-off date was 1 September 2006. GE.06-25894 ECE/MP.WAT/2006/16/Add.6 Page 2 Transboundary rivers discharging into the Black Sea and their major transboundary tributaries (Eastern Europe and
    [Show full text]
  • Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of Multiphysics Nuclear Reactor Core Depletion
    SENSITIVITY AND UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS OF MULTIPHYSICS NUCLEAR REACTOR CORE DEPLETION by Andrew Scott Bielen A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Nuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciences) in the University of Michigan 2015 Doctoral Committee: Professor Thomas J. Downar , Co-Chair Associate Professor Annalisa Manera, Co-Chair Associate Professor Krzysztof J. Fidkowski Professor John C. Lee Joseph L. Staudenmeier, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission For my wife, Lisa ii AKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to acknowledge the contributions of the many that helped and guided me through this Ph.D. process. First and foremost are my co-advisors Prof. Tom Downar and Prof. Annalisa Manera, whose guidance and support were instrumental in the completion of this dissertation. I would also like to thank my committee members, Prof. John Lee and Prof. Krzysztof Fidkowski, and Dr. Joe Staudenmeier of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, whose feedback on this dissertation was invaluable. Additionally, I thank my branch chief at the NRC, Dr. Chris Hoxie, for his patience, understanding, and support during the completion of this work. In addition to these members, I must also thank the following: Dr. Patrick Raynaud of the US NRC and Ken Geelhood of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, for conversations and guidance on working with and developing the FRAPCON fuel performance code for coupled neutronics and uncertainty analysis was crucial; Dr. Andrew Ward of the University of Michigan, for assisting me with the necessary PARCS/PATHS development and cross section generation using HELIOS; Dr. Tim Drzewiecki of the US NRC for assistance in providing the computer resources required to complete the sensitivity and uncertainty portion of this thesis; and Michael Rose and Thomas Saller at the University of Michigan for supporting me on my visits back to Ann Arbor.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Energy and the Three Mile Island Unit Two Accident Lesson Plans and Resource Guide
    Nuclear Energy and the Three Mile Island Unit Two Accident Lesson Plans and Resource Guide © 2009 EFMR Monitoring Group, Inc. 4100 Hillsdale Road, Harrisburg, PA 17112 www.efmr.org 1 Nuclear Energy and the Three Mile Island Unit Two Accident Lesson Plans and Resource Guide © 2009 EFMR Monitoring Group, Inc. 4100 Hillsdale Road Harrisburg, PA 17112 www.efmr.org (717)541-1101 Fax (717) 541-5487 Coordinator: Eric Epstein Authors: Diane Little Janna Match Illustrator: Ezra Match 2 Contents Background Information Introduction .........................................................................4 Energy Resources .. ………………………………………...…4 Nuclear Energy ...............……………………………………..5 The TMI Nuclear Reactors …………………………………....5 Nuclear Waste and Environmental Impacts .........................6 The TMI Unit Two Accident …………………………………..7 Elementary Lesson Plans Activity 1: Introduction to Energy …………………………. ...10 Activity 2: A Chain Reaction …....…………………………....11 Activity 3: Steam Turns Turbines ……………………….…....12 Activity 4: Reviewing Fission and Introducing the TMI Unit Two Accident ………………………….....12 Activity 5: Loss of Coolant in the TMI Unit Two Accident ….14 Activity 6: The Effects of the TMI Accident: Facts and Opinions …………….……...…………...15 Middle School Lesson Plans Activity 1: Comparing Energy Resources …………..……….16 Activity 2: Nuclear Reactor Model Demonstration ….............17 Activity 3: Simulating the TMI-2 Accident …………………….19 Activity 4: The Effects of the Accident ……………….….……20 Activity 5: Comparing the TMI-2 Accident to the
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Power Industry
    JSC ATOMENERGOMASH RESULTS OF 20161 1 The brochure data are valid as of April 26, 2017. JSC ATOMENERGOMASH RESULTS OF 2016 The pilot fast neutron reactor After a long interruption, JSC Atomenergomash with primary sodium CEFR the nuclear industry equipment reinforces the key 3,668 developed under the order manufacture was resumed at business areas – nuclear from Chinese Nuclear Power “Atommash” plant. In particular, power industry, gas and Corporation. The developer the activities were commenced petrochemical industry, of the reactor plant was for the manufacture of the main shipbuilding and general 10 YEARS OF PROGRESS OJSC Afrikantov OKBM, the equipment of the reactor island industry. steam generator developer of the Power units 1 and 2 of was OJSC OKB GIDROPRESS. Belarusian NPP. THE HISTORY OF JSC ATOMENERGOMASH, THE mechanical ENGINEERING DIVISION OF ROSATOM STATE CORPORATION (THE «DIVISION») STARTED FROM TWO 2,947 OJSC Atomenergomash The complete cycle of steam COMPANIES. TODAY THE DIVISION IS ONE OF THE LEADING mechanical ENGINEERING COMPANIES IN RUSSIA. IT COMPRISES OVER 20 LEADING ENGINEERING manufactured a core catcher generators manufacture was at the Atommash plant in mastered – from semi-products JSC TsKBM completed the BUREAUS, MAJOR MACHINE BUILDERS, RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS. THE DIVISION IS INVOLVED IN THE KEY PROJECTS IMPLEMENTED BY ROSATOM, WIDENS unprecedentedly short time (PJSC Energomashspetsstal) to test of the new MCP design – and supplied it to the Baltic body manufacture (OJSC PZM), single-shaft configuration 2,414 Labor productivity per employee, thousand rubles THE COMPETENCES AND ACTIVELY MASTERS NEW MARKETS AND TECHNOLOGIES. 2,397 NPP. assembly of in-vessel components with water cooling of motor and shipment to client and bearing assemblies that (OJSC ZiO-Podolsk).
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Programme [Pdf, 568
    Joint Stock Company «Russian concern for production of electric and thermal energy at nuclear power plants» (Rosenergoatom Concern JSC) ELEVENTH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL CONFERENCE “SAFETY, EFFICIENCY AND ECONOMICS OF NUCLEAR POWER INDUSTRY” (MNTK-2018) CONFERENCE PROGRAMME Moscow, May 23–24, 2018 OVERALL SCHEDULE AND TIMING May 23rd (1st Day) Participants registration (Conference hall lobby). с 0800 до 0900 Opening (Conference hall) . с 0900 до 0920 Plenary session (Conference hall) . с 0920 до 1200 Section session (the allocated rooms) . с 1400 до 1800 Exhibition of nuclear enterprises & organizations (Building 2 lobby) . с 1400 до 1800 Official dinner . с 1830 до 2100 May 24th (2nd Day) Section sessions, cont’d (the allocated rooms) . с 0900 до 1400 Exhibition of nuclear enterprises & organizations, cont’d (Building 2 lobby) . с 0900 до 1400 Plenary session – Summing up and Closing (Conference hall) . с 1430 до 1530 Timing Presentations at the plenary session: 25 to 30 min Presentations at the section sessions: 15 to 30 min including Q&A 2 CONTENTS CONFERENCE TOPICS. 5 PLENARY SESSION. 10 SECTION PROGRAMMES SECTION 1. SAFE AND EFFECTIVE OPERATION OF NPPS . 11 1.1. Operation, maintenance and repair of NPPs with VVER, RBMK, BN and EGP-6 reactors . 11 1.1.1. Operation of NPPs with VVER reactors . 11 1.1.2. Operation of NPPs with RBMK, BN and EGP-6 reactors. 13 1.1.3. Maintenance & repair and installation of NPP equipment . 15 1.2. Engineering support to NPP operations . 17 1.2.1. Equipment life management and nuclear power units lifetime extension . .17 1.2.2. Enhancement of electric equipment reliability .
    [Show full text]
  • TENEX Public Annual Report 2018 001 Публичный Годовой Отчет АО «Техснабэкспорт» 2018 002 8
    TENEX Public Annual Report 2018 001 Публичный годовой отчет АО «Техснабэкспорт» 2018 002 8 Approved by the resolution of the Board of Directors dated 28.05.2019 Director General Sergey Polgorodnik TENEX Public Annual Report 2018 2 Key Indicators of 2018 3 Key Indicators of 2018 Uranium contracting Financial results 107.0 Revenue RUB billion Contracts 18 concluded 21.1 Net profit RUB billion Total value 2.0 of concluded Earnings US $ billion contracts before Interest, 33.4 Taxes, RUB billion Depreciation and Amortization Number (EBITDA) 12 of customers Uranium sales HR and social policy Sales Average staff number Social volume programs 1.7 324 15.6 funding US $ billion people RUB million Funds directed on charity Number 4.0 80 of supplies RUB billion Number of country- 11 recipients TENEX Public Annual Report 2018 4 Stakeholder Public Assurance 5 Stakeholder Public Assurance1 Full name Company and position Signature Full name Company and position Signature Akisheva Оlga Deputy Director General for Economics and Finance, JSC “UECC” Head of Department for NFC Lifecycle Projects Integration with Koryakin Konstantin Sectorial Policies System, ROSATOM Deputy Director for International Operation — Director Belyaeva Marina of International Cooperation Department, ROSATOM Krupnik Pavel Director of International Programs, Centrus Energy Corp. Bochkin Oleg Strategic Communications Director, LLC Rusatom Overseas Deputy Head, Department for Safety Regulation of Nuclear Lavrinovich Andrey Fuel Cycle Facilities, Nuclear Power Plants for Ships and Radiation-hazardous
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Power: Is the Renaissance Real Or a Mirage? H-Holger Rogner & Alan Mcdonald International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) 1
    Nuclear Power: Is the Renaissance Real or a Mirage? H-Holger Rogner & Alan McDonald International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) 1 Keywords: Nuclear power status and projections, nuclear power economics, manufacturing capacity Summary In 2009, in the midst of the global financial and economic crises that began in 2008, and as the nuclear power industry posted its first two-year decline in installed capacity in history, the IAEA revised its projections for future nuclear power growth upwards. This paper summarizes the status of nuclear power in the world today and the status of all steps in the nuclear fuel cycle. It summarizes nuclear power’s prospects and important trends in key factors. It explains the reasons for optimism and rising expectations about nuclear power’s future, and it acknowledges that there is, nonetheless, much uncertainty. Conflicting indicators For nuclear power, 2009 was a second straight paradoxical year. In 2008, pprojections of future growth were revised upwards even though installed nuclear capacity actually declined during the year and no new reactors were connected to the grid. It was the first year since 1955 without at least one new reactor coming on-line. There were, however, ten construction starts, the most since 1987. In 2009 installed nuclear capacity dropped yet again, the first two-year drop in nuclear power’s history, with three reactors being retired and only two new ones connected to the grid. But the IAEA’s projections for nuclear power growth were again revised upward, by about 8%, even as the world was still dealing with the financial and economic crises that started in late 2008.
    [Show full text]