DOCSLIB.ORG

The Abandonment of Dacia and the Imperial Propaganda1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Abandonment of Dacia and the Imperial Propaganda1 THE ABANDONMENT OF DACIA AND THE IMPERIAL PROPAGANDA1 Liviu Petculescu2 Abstract: The abandonment of Dacia province was the result of the developments during the rd3 century AD and it must be studied as a part of the 235–284 terrible crisis of the Roman Empire which brought into question even its survival. The Roman historians who described the reunification of the Empire by Aurelianus in prizing terms stated that the emperor withdrew the army and the population from Dacia and moved them south of the Danube to the new province with the same name. So the abandonment of Dacia Traiana was presented as a restoration and not as a loss, since its whole garrison and population were saved and what was left behind was just a deserted territory and nothing else. Thus the official propaganda tried to cover a major failure of the Empire in the same way as after the loss of Germania province in AD 9, when the newly established military commandments west of the Rhine were named Germania Superior and Inferior, to infer the impression that actually the province had not been lost. Keywords: Roman Dacia, 3rd century crisis, abandonment of Dacia, Aurelianus. The abandonment of Dacia province was not a fortuitous event but the result of the developments during the 3rd century and so it must be studied as a part of the terrible crisis between AD 235–284, which brought into question even the survival of the Roman Empire 3. The very difficult situation of the Roman Empire was due to both an internal and an external crisis. Thus, the attacks of the barbarians were accompanied by the military anarchy and the huge inflation that caused the collapse of the economy. The political evolutions in the barbarian world led to unprecedented large‑scale attacks. In Europe, the movements of the Germanic populations from north to south were accompanied by unification processes which caused the formation of great tribe unions near the Roman borders: the Goths north of the Black Sea and westwards up to the North Sea the Vandals, Juthungi, Alamanni, Burgundians, Franks. Several older confederations resisted in the areas of the Middle and Lower Danube, such as the Iranian Sarmatians and the Carpi of Dacian origin that, especially at the beginning of the period, also represented a great danger for the Empire. In Asia, the Arsacid dynasty of the weak Parthian kingdom with a feudal type of struc‑ ture was replaced in 224 by a new dynasty of Persian origin, that of the Sassanids. It meant the establishment of a new Persian state that considered itself the successor of the old kingdom of the Achaemenids and claimed the right to possess all its territories, i.e. the whole Roman Orient. Having a centralised political structure and an impressive army, the kingdom of the Sassanids frequently attacked the oriental Roman provinces throughout the fifty years of crisis, sometimes 1 International colloquium „Policy and propaganda in the Roman empire (1st–3rd centuries AD)”. 2 [email protected] 3 Among the very extensive bibliography on the 3rd century crisis there are two recent publications which synthetize the state of research on this topic: HEKSTER/DE KLEIJN/SLOOTJES 2007 and JOHNE/ HARTMANN/GERHARDT 2008. Ephemeris Napocensis, XXVII, 2017, p. 259–266 260 Liviu Petculescu concurrently with the barbarians from Europe, a situation that brought the empire on the brink of disaster. However, the Roman army saved the situation eventually, in spite of the continuous fights against hard fighting enemies that sometimes outnumbered it. At the same time, soldiers from different provincial armies, aware of their power and role, often proclaimed emperors the generals who had led them to victory. Thus, there were many civil wars between emperors and usurping generals, a situation that brought about the weakening of the military force of Rome and, consequently, of its capacity to resist against external attacks. During this period of time the Roman official propaganda, as mirrored by the historical writings, was forced to pass from the almost exclusive exulting of victories, conquests and the superiority of the Roman civilisation to also hiding the defeats or, if this was not possible, to explaining them through the weaknesses of some emperors, internal anarchy, treacheries or the huge superiority of the enemies. So, when Gordian III died in AD 244 during his campaign against the Persians, the Roman historical tradition kept in Eutropius and Historia Augusta assigns his death to the disease or a treacherous murder but, in the famous inscription named by the modern historians Res gestae divi Saporis, the Sassanian king claims to have killed him in action4. However, as both official propagandas, the Roman and the Persian ones, were equally deceptive, one cannot state the real cause for the death of the Roman emperor. The first large scale attack on Dacia happened in 245 when the Carpi took advantage of the fact that the considerable part of the Roman army from the Lower Danubian provinces transferred in Orient to fight against the Persians didn’t come back to their garrisons. They broke through the defence of the limes Transalutanus and plundered southern Dacia and prob‑ ably also Transylvania, on this occasion capturing an inhabitant from Apulum5. The attack was so powerful that the intervention of the emperor Philip the Arab (244–249) was necessary to drive away the invaders6. The emperor came together with numerous troops, among which vexillations of legio VII Claudia from Moesia Superior and legio XXII Primigenia from Germania Superior7. After the peace treaty was concluded, Philip the Arab had some settlements fortified, especially in Dacia Malvensis, where Romula was provided with a defensive wall8. The same emperor granted the province Dacia in 246 the right to strike its own bronze coins with the legend provincia Dacia9. These coins were issued until 257, when the mint that struck them, most likely at Apulum or Sarmizegetusa, stopped its activity because the situation in Dacia was getting worse. The restoration of the province went on during emperor Decius’ reign (249– 251) mentioned in one of the inscriptions dedicated to him at Apulum as ‘restitutor Daciarum’ and during that of Trebonianus Gallus (251–253), when the road from Micia to Apulum was rebuilt10. In 250 the Goths invaded once again Moesia Inferior with a large army. They caused enormous damage south of the Danube, where they settled for a year and in 251 they succeeded in killing the emperor Decius in the battle at Abrittus, where the Roman army suffered a crushing defeat. It is very likely that during this invasion the barbarians also plundered southern Dacia. Anyway, at latest after this attack, if not a couple of years earlier, subsequent to the 4 Eutropius 9, 2, 3 murder; HA Gord. 30, 8 and 31, 2 murder or disease; Res Gestae divi Saporis 8. 5 CIL III 1054 = IDR III 5, 171. 6 Zosimos 1, 20, 1–2; LORIOT 1975, 793 date the campaign of the emperor against the Carpi from November 245 to the summer of 247. 7 IDR II 325–326 legio XXII; 327–328 legio VII. 8 CIL III 8031 = IDR II 324; IDR II 325–328. 9 ARDEVAN 1992/1993; ALFÖLDY‑GĂZDAC/GĂZDAC 2002/2003 with bibliography. 10 CIL III 1176 = IDR III 5, 431 Apulum; CIL III 8061= IDR III 3, 50 Micia. The abandonment of Dacia and the imperial propaganda 261 Carpic war, the entire so‑called limes Transalutanus was abandoned and the Dacian frontier south of the Carpathians was withdrawn to the Olt river bed11. As the region between the limes Transalutanus and the Olt river deserted by the Romans represented only a fraction of a frontier province it is not surprising that this first territorial loss of the empire at the Lower Danube was not recorded by the historical tradition. Valerianus and his son Gallienus ascended to the throne in 253. Throughout the two emperors’ joint rule, the Romans fought against the Alamanni and the Franks on the Rhine and the Goths and their allies who built a fleet and almost every year beginning with 256 organised plunder attacks on the Black Sea and the eastern Mediterranean. At the same time they have to fight against the Persians in Mesopotamia and on the frontier on the Euphrates river. However, Dacia’s situation seemed to be stable: until 257 bronze coins with the legend provincia Dacia were issued, honorary monuments were dedicated to Gallienus and the members of his family and at Potaissa, the commander of legio V Macedonica completed the construction of a temple dedicated to an oriental deity, Azizus Bonus Puer Conservator 12. From the Dacian army and especially its legions were formed some detachments that were sent to fight against the Persians as it results from the famous triumphal inscription of Sapur which lists among the mili‑ tary units composing the army of Valerianus those from Dacia13. Considering the frequent use of the Dacian troops in the oriental campaigns attested besides the inscriptions from Apameea, Doliche etc. and the oriental deities worshipped by the Dacian army also by the military equip‑ ment originating in the Danubian provinces found at Dura Europos, one can assert that the mention of Dacia as a province contributing to the Roman expeditionary army is real evidence for its effective structure and not only a flattering exaggeration of Sapur. Other vexillations were sent to fight against the Germanic tribes on the Rhine and afterwards remained in the army of the Gallic empire as attested by the aurei struck by Victorinus in 269–70 for the legions V Macedonica and XIII Gemina14. The year 260 was marked by unprecedented catastrophes.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Commagenorum
    CASTELUL DE LA CAPUT STENARUM ŞI COHORS I FLAVIA COMMAGENORUM Cristian SCHUSTER* Fortificaţia de la Boiţa/Caput Stenarum Înainte de a părăsi Transilvania, Oltul face un unghi de aproape 90 de grade, pornind apoi spre sud, prin Carpaţii Meridionali, devenind ulterior „graniţa” dintre Oltenia şi Muntenia. Chiar în dreptul respectivului cot, pe malul drept al râului, investigaţiile arheologice au permis descoperirea resturilor unei fortificaţii romane. Acestea, aflate în punctul cunoscut sub denumirea În Rude (fig. 1), se găsesc astăzi pe teritoriul satului Boiţa (oraşul Tălmaciu, judeţul Sibiu)1. Aşa cum se ştie, cei mai mulţi dintre specialişti consideră că în acest sat trebuie localizat ceea ce Tabula Peutingeriana indică a fi Caput Stenarum2. Prezenţa urmelor romane a fost semnalată încă de la sfârşitul veacului al XIX-lea - începutul celui următor3. Primele cercetări arheologice s-au derulat în 19574, fiind continuate în 19585, 19736, 19797 şi, în cadrul practicii arheologice a studenţilor de la Facultatea de Filologie-Istorie din Sibiu, în vara anului 19818. Fortificaţiei, prin dimensiunile sale reduse – „de 46 x 47 m, fiind, deci, aproape pătrată”9, i se potriveşte mai degrabă termenul de castellum decât cel de castrum. Cu privire la momentul ridicării fortificaţiei din piatră, dar şi a „termelor cu palestrele, tabulariului vămii şi construcţiile cu caracter gospodăresc” s-a emis ipoteza că ele au fost realizate „după anii 167-169 e.n., când s-a operat reorganizarea administrativă şi militară de către Marcus Aurelius”10. Spre această concluzie * Institutul de Arheologie „Vasile Pârvan” - Centrul de Tracologie, Bucureşti; e-mail: [email protected]. 1 Ghinea 1998. Despre denumirea În Rude a punctului, vezi: Albescu 1938, p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roman Army in the Third Century Ad Lukas De Blois My Issue In
    INTEGRATION OR DISINTEGRATION? THE ROMAN ARMY IN THE THIRD CENTURY A.D. Lukas de Blois My issue in this paper is: what was the main trend within the Roman military forces in the third century ad? Integration, or disintegration into regional entities? This paper is not about cultural integration of ethnic groups in multicultural parts of the Roman Empire, such as the city of Rome, thriving commercial centres, and border regions to which the armies had brought people from various parts of the Empire, and where multicultural military personnel lived together with indigenous groups, craftsmen from different origins, and immigrants from commercially active regions, either in canabae adjacent to castra stativa, or in garrison towns, as in the Eastern parts of the Empire. In variatio upon an issue raised by Frederick Naerebout in another paper published in this volume, I might ask myself in what sense an army, which in the third century ad was progressively composed of ethnically and culturally different units, kept functioning as an integrated entity, or in actual practice disintegrated into rivalling, particularistic regional forces whose actual or potential competition for money and supplies con- stantly threatened peace and stability in the Empire, particularly in times of dangerous external wars, when the need for supplies increased. The discussion should start with Septimius Severus. After his victories over Pescennius Niger, some tribes in northern Mesopotamia, and Albinus in Gaul, Severus had to replenish the ranks of his armies, for example at the Danube frontiers, which had yielded many men to Severus’ field armies and his new praetorian guard.
    [Show full text]
  • Romes Enemies: Germanics and Daciens No.1 Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    ROMES ENEMIES: GERMANICS AND DACIENS NO.1 PDF, EPUB, EBOOK P. Wilcox | 48 pages | 25 Nov 1982 | Bloomsbury Publishing PLC | 9780850454734 | English | New York, United Kingdom Romes Enemies: Germanics and Daciens No.1 PDF Book Aurelian established a new college of high priests, under the name Pontifices Dei Solis. We should believe it because later Hesychios wrote about tattooed men in those areas where among others lived also Dacians. Mommsen shows that Julius Caesar was prepared to attack the " Danubian wolves ", being obsessed by the idea of the destruction of the non-Roman religious centers, which represented major obstacles for the Roman colonization. More search options. They did not do only the usual colouring of the body because Plinios reported that those marks and scars can be inherited from father to son for few generations and still remain the same - the sign of Dacian origin. Military uniforms are shown in full colour artwork. Allers Illustrerede Konversations-Leksikon' Copenhagen says that the Morlaks are some of the best sailors in the Austrian navy. But Dichineus is Dicineus as referred by Iordanes, a great Dacian priest and king of the kings. Cesar Yudice rated it liked it Jan 25, This ritual was practiced in Thrace and, most probably, in Dacia. Crisp, tight pages. He lived there for about three or four years. IV of Th. A painted statue left representing a Dacian is found in Boboli. Herodot tells us about "Zalmoxis, who is called also Gebeleizis by some among them". Members Reviews Popularity Average rating Conversations 85 2 , 3. The commander of the Dacians was Diurpaneus , according to the Roman historian Tacitus, a "tarabostes" namely an aristocrat, according to local denomination and to whom the king Duras Durbaneus, would grant his throne soon after Tapae's victory.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Internal Borders in the Roman Empire: Written Sources and Model Cases
    Philippe Della Casa & Eckhard Deschler-Erb (eds.). Rome’s Internal Frontiers. Proceedings of the 2016 RAC session in Rome. Zurich Studies in Archaeology, Vol. 11, 2016, 11–16. The importance of internal borders in the Roman Empire: Written sources and model cases Anne Kolb & Lukas Zingg Universität Zürich, Historisches Seminar, Karl Schmid-Strasse 4, CH-8006 Zürich, [email protected], [email protected] Throughout the Roman Empire, borders divided territories such as provinces, customs areas, and cities. This paper aims at presenting examples of written sources which illustrate the function and significance of internal borders. A dispute over a canal building (Tac. ann. 13,53) provides an example for problems that could arise from cross-border activities. The control of boundaries could be ensured by military posts, as indicated by votive inscriptions to border gods. The exceptional marking of a provincial boundary in the Danube area has to be seen in context of territorial changes. Some milestones refer to provincial borders and seem to have occasionally served as border markers. Keywords: Provincial Borders, Provincial Territories, Military Stations, Boundary Markers, Milestones 1. Introduction of dispute between cities, tribes, or private individuals, the Over an area of approximately 6 million square kilomet- decision fell usually in the realm of the provincial governor res, the Romans ruled an enormous Empire, encompassing or an official commissioned with the task (Dilke 1971; Gals- about 50 to 80 million people. The consolidation and ad- terer 1992; Von Cranach 1996; Campbell 2000; Lewis 2001; ministrative pervasion of this global empire was the pri- Willi 2014; Kolb 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • The Remaking of the Dacian Identity in Romania and the Romanian Diaspora
    THE REMAKING OF THE DACIAN IDENTITY IN ROMANIA AND THE ROMANIAN DIASPORA By Lucian Rosca A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of George Mason University in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Sociology Committee: ___________________________________________ Director ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ Department Chairperson ___________________________________________ Dean, College of Humanities and Social Sciences Date: _____________________________________ Fall Semester 2015 George Mason University, Fairfax, VA The Remaking of the Dacian Identity in Romania and the Romanian Diaspora A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts at George Mason University By Lucian I. Rosca Bachelor of Arts George Mason University, 2015 Director: Patricia Masters, Professor Department of Sociology Fall Semester 2015 George Mason University Fairfax, VA ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my thesis coordinators: Professor Patricia Masters, Professor Dae Young Kim, Professor Lester Kurtz, and my wife Paula, who were of invaluable help. Fi- nally, thanks go out to the Fenwick Library for providing a clean, quiet, and well- equipped repository in which to work. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Tables................................................................................................................... v List of Figures ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the Roman Army (200 BC – AD 476)
    Impact of Empire 6 IMEM-6-deBlois_CS2.indd i 5-4-2007 8:35:52 Impact of Empire Editorial Board of the series Impact of Empire (= Management Team of the Network Impact of Empire) Lukas de Blois, Angelos Chaniotis Ségolène Demougin, Olivier Hekster, Gerda de Kleijn Luuk de Ligt, Elio Lo Cascio, Michael Peachin John Rich, and Christian Witschel Executive Secretariat of the Series and the Network Lukas de Blois, Olivier Hekster Gerda de Kleijn and John Rich Radboud University of Nijmegen, Erasmusplein 1, P.O. Box 9103, 6500 HD Nijmegen, The Netherlands E-mail addresses: [email protected] and [email protected] Academic Board of the International Network Impact of Empire geza alföldy – stéphane benoist – anthony birley christer bruun – john drinkwater – werner eck – peter funke andrea giardina – johannes hahn – fik meijer – onno van nijf marie-thérèse raepsaet-charlier – john richardson bert van der spek – richard talbert – willem zwalve VOLUME 6 IMEM-6-deBlois_CS2.indd ii 5-4-2007 8:35:52 The Impact of the Roman Army (200 BC – AD 476) Economic, Social, Political, Religious and Cultural Aspects Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop of the International Network Impact of Empire (Roman Empire, 200 B.C. – A.D. 476) Capri, March 29 – April 2, 2005 Edited by Lukas de Blois & Elio Lo Cascio With the Aid of Olivier Hekster & Gerda de Kleijn LEIDEN • BOSTON 2007 This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC 4.0 License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
    [Show full text]
  • 165 Years of Roman Rule on the Left Bank of the Danube. at The
    92 Chapter III PROVINCIA DACIA AUGUSTI: 165 years of Roman rule on the left bank of the Danube. At the beginning of the 2nd century, in the Spring of 101AD, Roman Forces marched against the Kingdom of Decebal. We already know what the Roman's rationale was for starting this war and we also know that the real reason was likely to have been the personal ambition of the first Provincial Emperor, Trajan (he was born in Hispania a man of Macedonian background among Greeks). The Roman armies marched against a client-state of Rome, which was a subordinate ally of Rome. Decebal did not want to wage war against Rome and his recurring peace offers confirm this. It is unlikely that Trajan would only have decided on the total conquest of the Dacian Kingdom after he waged his first campaign in 101-102. After this, Roman garrisons were established in the Province - their ongoing presence is reflected by the Latin names of towns (as recorded by Ptolemy). At Dobreta they begin to build the stone bridge which will span the Danube. It was built in accordance with plans made by Apollodorus of Damascus to promote continuous traffic - it was an accomplishment unmatched - even by Rome. This vast project portends that Trajan began the expedition against Dacia in 101 with the intention of incorporating the Kingdom into the Roman Empire. The Emperor, who founded a city (Nicopolis) to commemorate his victory over Dacia, has embarked on this campaign not only for reasons of personal ambition. The 93 economic situation of the Empire was dismal at the beginning of Trajan's reign; by the end of the second Dacian War it has vastly improved.
    [Show full text]
  • FRONTIER IDENTITIES Roman Villa and Settlement Excavation and Survey
    LIFE BY THE IMPERIAL ROAD - FRONTIER IDENTITIES Roman Villa and Settlement Excavation and Survey IDENTITY AND WEALTH: ROMAN PROVINCIAL LANDSCAPE STRATEGIES Rapolt, Transylvania, Romania June 7 - July 4; July 20 - August 1, 2020 During the Roman colonial occupation, southern Transylvania shows a very dynamic and intensive synthesis of Roman provincial life, where a multitude of processes of colonization and creolization take place side by side. Prior to the Roman conquest of 102AD, it was also the most densely populated region of the Dacian Kingdoms. Our project seeks to explore the integration of all the structural provincial elements present along the main Roman axes of communication and transport. Our research area is in the immediate proximity of both the imperial road and the Mures River, the extremely important gold deposits of the Carpathian Gold Moutains, and the political and military centers of Sarmizegetusa Ulpia Traiana and Apulum. We will continue the excavation of the well preserved structures, including a villa rustica of palatial size, identified during our 2013-2019 field seasons. Our 2020 excavation and survey will aim at understanding the importance and impact of the proximity of the main axis of movement, communication and commerce on the Roman provincial rural life, and its evolution through time, as well as the local processes of identity creation. Our participants will participate to the villa excavation, geochemical and geophysical survey, Duration: 4 week sessions STP survey and laboratory analysis. This Costs: US$1695 for each 4-week session extraordinary environment with its associated It includes: monuments and material culture, combined with excavation registration, taxes, fees lectures and spectacular surrounding natural landscapes and most gear beautiful Transylvanian churches and castles, housed as guests of Romanian families in a guarantees all students and volunteers with a highly beautiful traditional Transylvanian village full room and board, Monday-Friday rewarding archaeological and cultural experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Christian Church8
    www.ssoar.info From periphery to centre: the image of Europe at the Eastern Border of Europe Şipoş, Sorin (Ed.); Moisa, Gabriel (Ed.); Cepraga, Dan Octavian (Ed.); Brie, Mircea (Ed.); Mateoc, Teodor (Ed.) Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Konferenzband / collection Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Şipoş, S., Moisa, G., Cepraga, D. O., Brie, M., & Mateoc, T. (Eds.). (2014). From periphery to centre: the image of Europe at the Eastern Border of Europe. Cluj-Napoca: Ed. Acad. Română. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168- ssoar-400284 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY Lizenz (Namensnennung) zur This document is made available under a CC BY Licence Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden (Attribution). For more Information see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de Edited by: Sorin §ipo§, Gabriel Moisa, Dan Octavian Cepraga, Mircea Brie, Teodor Mateoc From Periphery to Centre. The Image of Europe at the Eastern Border of Europe Editorial committee: Delia-Maria Radu Roxana Iva^ca Alexandra Bere IonuJ Ciorba Romanian Academy Center for Transylvanian Studies Cluj-Napoca 2014 Descrierea CIP a Bibliotecii Nationale a României From periphery to centre : the image of Europe at the Eastern border of Europe/ Sorin Çipoç, Gabriel Moisa, Dan Octavian Cepraga, Mircea Brie (ed.). - Cluj-Napoca : Editura Academia Românâ. Centrul de Studii Transilvane, 2014 ISBN 978-973-7784-97-1 I. Çipoç, Sorin (ed.) II. Moisa, Gabriel (ed.) III. Cepraga, Dan Octavian (ed.) IV. Brie, Mircea (ed.) 930 Volume published with the support of Bihor County Council The volume gathers the papers presented at the international symposium From Periphery to Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tale of Two Periods
    A tale of two periods Change and continuity in the Roman Empire between 249 and 324 Pictured left: a section of the Naqš-i Rustam, the victory monument of Shapur I of Persia, showing the captured Roman emperor Valerian kneeling before the victorious Sassanid monarch (source: www.bbc.co.uk). Pictured right: a group of statues found on St. Mark’s Basilica in Venice, depicting the members of the first tetrarchy – Diocletian, Maximian, Constantius and Galerius – holding each other and with their hands on their swords, ready to act if necessary (source: www.wikipedia.org). The former image depicts the biggest shame suffered by the empire during the third-century ‘crisis’, while the latter is the most prominent surviving symbol of tetrar- chic ideology. S. L. Vennik Kluut 14 1991 VB Velserbroek S0930156 RMA-thesis Ancient History Supervisor: Dr. F. G. Naerebout Faculty of Humanities University of Leiden Date: 30-05-2014 2 Table of contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Sources ............................................................................................................................................ 6 Historiography ............................................................................................................................... 10 1. Narrative ............................................................................................................................................ 14 From
    [Show full text]
  • Centurions, Quarries, and the Emperor
    Comp. by: C. Vijayakumar Stage : Revises1 ChapterID: 0002507155 Date:5/5/15 Time:11:37:24 Filepath://ppdys1122/BgPr/OUP_CAP/IN/Process/0002507155.3d View metadata,Dictionary : OUP_UKdictionarycitation and similar 289 papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – REVISES, 5/5/2015,provided SPi by University of Liverpool Repository 16 Centurions, Quarries, and the Emperor Alfred M. Hirt INTRODUCTION The impact of Rome on the exploitation of natural resources remains highly visible in the many ancient stone and marble quarries dotting the landscape of the former empire. Not only do they reveal the techniques employed in separating the marble or granite from the rock face, the distribution of their output can still be traced. The progressively more scientific determination of type and origin of these stones used in sacred and profane architecture of the Roman Empire reveals an increasingly detailed image of the distributive patterns of coloured stones. Even so, the analysis of these patterns stays vexed: the written sources are frightfully mute on the core issues, expressly on the emperor’s role in the quarrying industry and his impact on the marble trade. Scholarly discourse has oscillated between two positions: John Ward- Perkins argued that by the mid-first century AD all ‘principal’ quarries were ‘nationalized’, i.e. put under imperial control and leased out to contractors for rent; the quarries were a source of revenue for the emperor, the distribution of its output driven by commercial factors.1 Clayton Fant, however, offered a different view: the emperor monopolized the use of coloured and white marbles and their sources not for profit, but for ‘prestige’, consolidating his position as unchallenged patron and benefactor of the empire.
    [Show full text]
  • The Epitome De Caesaribus and the Thirty Tyrants
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ELTE Digital Institutional Repository (EDIT) THE EPITOME DE CAESARIBUS AND THE THIRTY TYRANTS MÁRK SÓLYOM The Epitome de Caesaribus is a short, summarizing Latin historical work known as a breviarium or epitomé. This brief summary was written in the late 4th or early 5th century and summarizes the history of the Roman Empire from the time of Augustus to the time of Theodosius the Great in 48 chapters. Between chapters 32 and 35, the Epitome tells the story of the Empire under Gallienus, Claudius Gothicus, Quintillus, and Aurelian. This was the most anarchic time of the soldier-emperor era; the imperatores had to face not only the German and Sassanid attacks, but also the economic crisis, the plague and the counter-emperors, as well. The Scriptores Historiae Augustae calls these counter-emperors the “thirty tyrants” and lists 32 usurpers, although there are some fictive imperatores in that list too. The Epitome knows only 9 tyrants, mostly the Gallic and Western usurpers. The goal of my paper is to analyse the Epitome’s chapters about Gallienus’, Claudius Gothicus’ and Aurelian’s counter-emperors with the help of the ancient sources and modern works. The Epitome de Caesaribus is a short, summarizing Latin historical work known as a breviarium or epitomé (ἐπιτομή). During the late Roman Empire, long historical works (for example the books of Livy, Tacitus, Suetonius, Cassius Dio etc.) fell out of favour, as the imperial court preferred to read shorter summaries. Consequently, the genre of abbreviated history became well-recognised.1 The word epitomé comes from the Greek word epitemnein (ἐπιτέμνειν), which means “to cut short”.2 The most famous late antique abbreviated histories are Aurelius Victor’s Liber de Caesaribus (written in the 360s),3 Eutropius’ Breviarium ab Urbe condita4 and Festus’ Breviarium rerum gestarum populi Romani.5 Both Eutropius’ and Festus’ works were created during the reign of Emperor Valens between 364 and 378.
    [Show full text]