A Bridge, Or a Breach, Between Turkey and the European Union?
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
PC.NGO/34/04 13 September 2004 ENGLISH only OSCE Conference on Tolerance and the Fight against Racism, Xenophobia and Discrimination, Brussels, 13 and 14 September 2004 Istanbul Bilgi University Centre for Migration Research Euro-Turks: A Bridge, or a Breach, between Turkey and the European Union? RESEARCH REPORT A Comparative Research of German-Turks and French-Turks by AYHAN KAYA and FERHAT KENTEL September 2004 1 ISTANBUL BILGI UNIVERSITY CENTRE FOR MIGRATION RESEARCH Principal Researchers: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ayhan Kaya İstanbul Bilgi University Department of International Relations [email protected] Assist. Prof. Dr. Ferhat Kentel İstanbul Bilgi University Department of Sociology [email protected] Contact Persons: Ayhan Kaya, Director Neşe Erdilek, Administrative Director İnönü Cad. No. 28 Kustepe 80310 Şişli Istanbul-Turkey Tel: (+90 212) 3116546 Tel: (+90 212) 3116182 Fax: (+90 212) 216 24 09 [email protected] [email protected] http://www.cmr.bilgi.edu.tr 2 Euro-Turks: A Bridge, or a Breach, between Turkey and European Union? Sponsored by Istanbul Bilgi University Open Society Institute Heinrich Böll Foundation Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs European Union General Secretariat, Ankara Principal Researchers: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ayhan Kaya Assist. Prof. Dr. Ferhat Kentel İstanbul Bilgi University İstanbul Bilgi University Department of International Department of Sociology Relations Inonu Cad. No. 28 Inonu Cad. No. 28 Şişli, Istanbul, Turkey Şişli, Istanbul, Turkey Tel:(+90 212) 311 61 31 Tel: (+90 212) 311 61 82 Fax: (+90 212) 216 84 76 Fax: (+90 212) 216 84 76 e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] Advisors: Assist. Prof. Dr. Bianca Kaiser Dr. Martin Greve Istanbul Kültür University Berlin, Germany Department of International Tel:030.854 56 88 Relations Tel: 0212.639 30 24 (3315 ext.) [email protected] b.kaiser@ikıu.edu.tr 3 Table of Contents Introduction European Union: A Peace Project for Turkey Aims of the Research Rationale of the Project Aims and Objectives Fieldwork and Methodology Chapter 1. Migratory Process in Germany and France Migratory Process in Germany Towards a limited hyphenated citizenship: German-Turks Migratory Process in France The rise of anti-immigrant nationalist discourse in France Chapter 2. Profile of the Sample Chapter 3. Euro-Turks and Social Classes Chapter 4. Homeland vs. “Host”land Perceptions on Turkey Perceptions on Germany/France Images in Comparison: Homeland and “Host”land Policies of Citizenship: Integration / Assimilation “Unity-in-diversity” or “Unity-over-diversity” Chapter 5. Europe and the European Union Alternative Projects of Europe: A holistic Europe, or a syncretic Europe? Euro-Turks’ Perspectives on the European Union EU Membership and Migration Prospects for Turks Chapter 6. Building New Identities Europeanness: A Constant Process of Being and Becoming Islam in Europe: Symbolic religiosity Religion vs. Secularism: A Safe Haven on Earth! Multiculturalism vs. Interculturalism ‘Imported Brides or Bridegrooms’ from Turkey Conclusion Bibliography 4 Introduction European Union: A Peace Project for Turkey Engulfed by several political, ethnic, religious, and political predicaments in her neighbouring countries, Turkey is going through one of the steadiest periods in history. In the Helsinki Summit (December 1999), the European Heads of State and Government for the first time offered Turkey a concrete prospect for full membership into the European Union, more than four decades after its application for association with the European Economic Community in July 1959. The decision given in Helsinki was almost the opposite of the decision held in Luxembourg Summit of 1997. The Luxembourg Summit decision was meant to turn down Turkey’s hopes for the EU. The response of the public in Turkey was remarkably immediate and harsh. Popular nationalism, minority nationalisms, Kemalism, religiosity, Occidentalism and Euroscepticism reached the hit the highest point just in the aftermath of the Luxembourg Summit. Thank to the December 1999 Helsinki Summit, the destructive atmosphere in Turkey did not last so long. The European Union perspective given to Turkey in Helsinki has radically shaken the deep-rooted political establishment in the country, opening up new prospects for various ethnic, religious, social and political groups. For instance, Kurds and Islamists in Turkey have become true advocates of the European Union in a way that affirms the pillars of the political union as a peace project. The EU stands as a great motivation for several groups in Turkey reinforcing their willingness to coexist. What lies beneath this willingness of coexistence no longer seems to be the retrospective past full of ideological and political disagreements; it is rather the prospective future embracing differences in a democratic way. The EU seems to be the major catalyst at the moment accelerating the process of peaceful coexistence of differences in Turkey. “If the European Council in December 2004, on the basis of a report and recommendation from the Commission, decides that Turkey fulfils the Copenhagen political criteria, the European Union will open accession negotiations with Turkey without delay.” said in the conclusions of the European Council, summoned in Copenhagen in December 2002. However, both the political establishment and public in each of the European Union countries are aware of the fact that Turkey’s membership into the Union shall stimulate further the discussions of “European identity” and “the limits of Europe”. Recently, there are heated public debates in several countries on Turkey’s membership into the Union, mostly disfavouring the membership of a large state like Turkey with its overwhelmingly Muslim population and socio-economic conditions below the European average. Some put forward socio-economic disparities between Turkey and the EU, some underline Islamic character of Turkey, some put emphasis on Turkey’s undemocratic and patrimonial political culture, and some even raise the clash of civilizations in order to resist Turkey’s membership. Nobody can deny the fact that it is not an easy task to include Turkey in the Union. However, a more constructive discourse ought to be generated with regard to Turkey’s full membership in order to revitalize the fundamentals of the European Union, which are known to be addressing at “a peace project”. There is no doubt that a peace project requires a constructive discourse, but not a destructive one. The discourse developed by the Independent Commission on Turkey is of this kind, which deserves admiration.1 The decision given in the 1999 Helsinki Summit brought about a great stream of reforms. Turkey, for instance, has achieved more reform in just over two years than in the whole of the previous decade. Several laws were immediately passed in the National Parliament to fulfil the Copenhagen political criteria; strict anti- inflationist economic policies have been successfully put into force; institutional transparency and liberalism have been endorsed; both formal nationalism and minority nationalism were precluded; and socio-economic disparities between regions have also been dealt with. However, there are still a lot to be done and to be implemented. Despite all these reforms and good will, the public in the EU countries are not convinced with the prospective Turkish membership. The only feasible way to have a positive impact on the European public opinion regarding Turkey’s entry into the Union, objective and constructive data should be produced away from prejudice and clishés. There is no doubt that the EU states will not only say ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ to Turkey’s prospective full membership option, but they will also decide on the future of the Union. The decision on Turkey is actually more complex than it seems. By this decision, the EU will essentially find out where to go: “No to Turkey!” will retrieve the conservative stream in the Union, which tends to define Europe and the EU as a Christian, holistic, static, essentialist, culturalist and civilizational block, while “Yes to Turkey!” shall wave the progressive flag in the EU, addressing at the political, economic, syncretic, dynamic and postnational fabric of the Union. 1 The Independent Commission on Turkey was established in March 2004 with the support of the British Council and Open Society Institute. The Commission is composed of Anthony Giddens, Marcelino Oreja Aguirre, Michel Rocard, Albert Rohan (Rapporteur), Martti Ahtisaari (Chairman), Kurt Biedenkopf, Emma Bonino, Hans van den Broek and Bronislaw Geremek. Their purpose was to examine the major challenges and opportunities connected with Turkey’s possible accession to the Union.They met regularly for intensive discussions, visited Turkey and analysed expertise from various sources.Close contact was maintained with European institutions.The Independent Commission’s work programme did not include issues under review by the European Commission for its forthcoming Progress Report on Turkey. See the Report of the Independent Commission on Turkey, Brussels (September 2004). 5 The leaders of the EU countries will probably give a decision in the Amsterdam Summit in December 2004 concerning the date to start accession negotiations. However, there are still strong popular stereotypes among the public of each member country in the Union, claiming that Turkey does not politically, economically, socially, and culturally fit into the EU. These stereotypes mostly spring from the ways in which Euro-Turks have