Canada AECB WORKSHOP on SEISMIC HAZARD ASSESSMENT in SOUTHERN ONTARIO — RECORDED PROCEEDINGS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Canada AECB WORKSHOP on SEISMIC HAZARD ASSESSMENT in SOUTHERN ONTARIO — RECORDED PROCEEDINGS INFO-0604-2 CA9800077 AECB Workshop on Seismic Hazard Assessment in Southern Ontario — Recorded Proceedings m. • •:> Ottawa, Ontario June 19-21. 1995 NEXT PAOE(S) !ef t PLANK Atomic Energy Commission de controle Control Boara de I'energie atomique Canada AECB WORKSHOP ON SEISMIC HAZARD ASSESSMENT IN SOUTHERN ONTARIO — RECORDED PROCEEDINGS PREFACE A workshop on seismic hazard assessment in southern Ontario was conducted on June 19-21, 1995. The purpose of the workshop was to review available geological and seismological data which could affect earthquake occurrence hi southern Ontario and to develop a consensus on approaches that should be adopted for characterization of seismic hazard. The workshop was structured in technical sessions to focus presentations and discussions on four technical issues relevant to seismic hazard in southern Ontario, as follows: (1) The importance of geological and geophysical observations for the determination of seismic sources. (2) Methods and approaches which may be adopted for determining seismic sources based on integrated interpretations of geological and seismological information. (3) Methods and data which should be used for characterizing the seismicity parameters of seismic sources. (4) Methods for assessment of vibratory ground motion hazard. This document presents transcripts from recordings made of the presentations and discussion from the workshop. It will be noted, in some sections of the document, that the record is incomplete. This is due in part to recording equipment malfunction and in part due to the poor quality of recording obtained for certain periods. PREFACE Un atelier sur revaluation des dangers sismiques en Ontario meridional a 6te tenu du 19 au 21 juin 1995. L'atelier avait comme but l'examen des donne"es ge"ologiques et sismologiques disponibles concernant la possibility* de seismes en Ontario meridional et l'6tablissement d'un consensus concernant les m6thodes a retenir pour la caracterisation de ces dangers. L'atelier 6tait structure" en stances techniques visant k centrer les presentations et les discussions sur les quatre themes techniques pertinents quant aux dangers de s&sme en Ontario meridional : 1) 1'importance des observations geologiques et g6ophysiques sur la determination des sources sismiques, 2) les m6thodes et les approches qui pourraient permettre de determiner les sources sismiques d'apres des interpretations integrees de 1'information geologique et sismologique, • • • in 3) les mSthodes et les donne'es qui pourraient servir a la caractlrisation des parametres de l'activite" sismique des sources sismiques, 4) les m£thodes devaluation du danger de mouvement vibratoire du sol. Le present document contient une transcription de l'enregistrement des presentations et des d£bats lors de l'atelier. Comme il est indique' par endroits, certains segments sont incomplete en raison du mauvais fonctionnement de l'enregistreuse et de la pietre quality de Tenregistrement a certains moments. DISCLAIMER The Atomic Energy Control Board is not responsible for the accuracy of the statements made or the opinions expressed in this publication and neither the Board nor the authors assume liability with respect to any damage or loss incurred as a result of the use made of the information contained in this publication. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE iii SESSION A (Chairman: Carl Stepp) 1 INTRODUCTION (Carl Stepp) 1 Purpose of the workshop And AECB objectives (John Waddington) 1 Overview of the workshop (Carl Stepp) 3 SESSION B (Chairman: Carl Stepp) 7 BACKGROUND 7 National Building Code requirements (Peter Basham) 7 Site and regional investigations according to CSA-N289.2 (Peter Basham) 10 SESSION C (Chairman: Ray Price) 16 IMPORTANCE OF VARIOUS GEOLOGICAL AND GEOPHYSICAL OBSERVATIONS FOR DETERMINING SEISMIC SOURCES IN SOUTHERN ONTARIO 16 Characteristics of the Niagara-Pickering and Georgian Bay linear zones and their implications for a large magnitude earthquake in the vicinity of the Darlington and Pickering nuclear power plants, near Toronto (Joe Wallach) 16 Interpretation of aeromagnetic and gravity anomalies in the Precambrian shield of southern Ontario (Walter Roest) 28 Extension of the St. Lawrence fault zone southwest of Cornwall into Lake Ontario (Joe Wallach) 33 Deep seismic crustal results in Southern Ontario (Dave Forsyth) 39 Implications for seismic risk in Southern Ontario based on a review of the region's geology (Mike Easton, et al) 46 Geophysical signatures in the bed of Lake Ontario (Rich Thomas) 52 Neotectonic features in the Quaternary sediments of Lake Ontario: Interpretation of geophysical survey data in the vicinity at Darlington Nuclear Generating Station; seismic hazard implications (Mike Lewis) . 59 Geophysical signatures under Lake Ontario (Joe Wallach & John Bowlby) 65 Faults in the Metropolitan Toronto area; active vs dormant faults (Arsalan Mohajer) 70 Interpretation of the Rouge River faulting, Metropolitan Toronto. What would an active fault with an unknown return period contribute to seismic hazard assessment? (John Adams) 77 Character and reactivation history of the Clarendon-Linden fault system: Evidence from southwestern New York State (Bob Jacobi) .... 83 General discussion 89 Summary and recommendations for research (Ray Price) 105 INTRODUCTION, DAY 2 (Carl Stepp) 114 SESSION D (Chairman: Kevin Coppersmith) 115 METHODS AND APPROACHES FOR DETERMINING SEISMIC SOURCES BASED ON GEOLOGICAL AND SEISMOLOGICAL INFORMATION 115 Methods and procedures for determining seismic sources based on geological and seismological information (Kevin Coppersmith) 115 Seismicity of Lake Ontario region (Anne Stevens) 126 Seismogenesis and structure in the Lake Erie and Lake Ontario region of the U.S. from a global perspective (Nano Seeber) 132 The southern Ontario seismic network - applications to seismic hazard and earthquake engineering (Harold Asmis) 138 Local seismic monitoring east of Toronto (Arsalan Mohajer) 143 Seismic source zone modelling in eastern Canada for National Building Code applications (Peter Basham) 147 Seismic source zone interpretation in southern Ontario (Arsalan Mohajer) 151 The tectonic stress field in eastern Canada:-its use in seismic source interpretation (John Adams) 156 Pop-ups and offset boreholes as geological indicators of earthquake- prone areas in intraplate eastern North America (Joe Wallach) 161 Hazards associated with seismically active linear zones (Christine Powell) 169 General discussion 175 Summary and recommendations for research (Kevin Coppersmith) 185 SESSION E (Chairman: George Klimkiewicz) 191 METHODS AND DATA FOR CHARACTERIZING THE SEISMICITY PARAMETERS OF SEISMIC SOURCES 191 Stable continental earthquakes and seismic hazard in eastern North America (Arch Johnston) 191 Seismicity parameters for eastern Canadian seismic source zones (Peter Basham) 199 General discussion 202 Summary and recommendations for research (George Klimkiewicz) .... 213 SESSION F (Chairman: Robin McGuire) 216 METHODS TO ASSESS VIBRATORY GROUND MOTION HAZARD AND APPLICATIONS 216 VI Use of probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for evaluating nuclear power plant core-damage frequency (Robin McGuire) 216 Sources of uncertainty and its treatment in seismic hazard analysis in eastern Canada (John Adams) 226 General discussion 234 Summary and recommendations for research (Robin McGuire) 243 SESSION G 247 WORKSHOP SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Carl Stepp and the Session Chairmen) 247 vu Tape 1 - Side 1: SESSION A Chairman: Carl Stepp INTRODUCTION Carl Stepp Carl Stepp: I want to give an overview of the workshop and I'll be doing that in just a few moments, but first I would like to introduce Mr. John Waddington who will overview the purpose of the workshop on behalf of the AECB. John. Purpose of the workshop And AECB objectives John Waddington J. Waddington: Thank you Carl. Good morning ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to Ottawa, for those who've come from our colleagues down south. I'd like to just outline to you why we're here, for the next 2 and 54 days. Now, to ensure that Canadian nuclear reactors do not pose an undue risk to the Canadian public, the AECB needs to be assured that the probability of an event which could cause significant damage to the stations, and hence to the potential release of radioactive material to the environment, is very low indeed. Typically, we wish to satisfy ourselves, that the probability of significant core damage is less than about 10'5 per station in any one year. Now one of the significant contributors to overall risk, and you can see this from the PRAs that are done, is the potential effect of an earthquake on the station. Now one of the reasons, in my view, for the significance of this contribution, is in fact, lack of knowledge. Direct observations of earthquakes, that is the historical record available to us here in eastern Ontario, is very limited. We only have 2 to 300 years worth of direct observations at most. So using direct observations on their own, would only enable us to predict the earthquakes of about 10" return probability, which could be stretched with good bits of science from GSC, perhaps, to 10"3 if we're lucky, 5 times 10"3, somewhere in that range. Now, as I mentioned, we at the AECB are seeking to ensure that severe core damage is less than 10"5 per year. Obviously, there's a gap here. Now our licensees have dealt with this difficulty by designing the stations with a very large margin of safety, much larger than you might get in an ordinary office block, for example. If an earthquake occurred, which was equivalent to the design basis, we would expect the stations to, essentially, ride through unscathed and, in essence, be able to operate the next day. This implies that much larger earthquakes would be needed before damage appeared and became serious. This is, however, a gap in our knowledge, what level of earthquake could damage the station and how likely is it? Now, knowledge of seismic, the seismicity of eastern Ontario, as elsewhere in the world, has developed substantially in the last 20 years. Many new seismological, geophysical and geological observations have been made since Pickering and Darlington nuclear power stations first received their construction license from the AECB.
Recommended publications
  • Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-44568-9 — Active Faults of the World Robert Yeats Index More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-44568-9 — Active Faults of the World Robert Yeats Index More Information Index Abancay Deflection, 201, 204–206, 223 Allmendinger, R. W., 206 Abant, Turkey, earthquake of 1957 Ms 7.0, 286 allochthonous terranes, 26 Abdrakhmatov, K. Y., 381, 383 Alpine fault, New Zealand, 482, 486, 489–490, 493 Abercrombie, R. E., 461, 464 Alps, 245, 249 Abers, G. A., 475–477 Alquist-Priolo Act, California, 75 Abidin, H. Z., 464 Altay Range, 384–387 Abiz, Iran, fault, 318 Alteriis, G., 251 Acambay graben, Mexico, 182 Altiplano Plateau, 190, 191, 200, 204, 205, 222 Acambay, Mexico, earthquake of 1912 Ms 6.7, 181 Altunel, E., 305, 322 Accra, Ghana, earthquake of 1939 M 6.4, 235 Altyn Tagh fault, 336, 355, 358, 360, 362, 364–366, accreted terrane, 3 378 Acocella, V., 234 Alvarado, P., 210, 214 active fault front, 408 Álvarez-Marrón, J. M., 219 Adamek, S., 170 Amaziahu, Dead Sea, fault, 297 Adams, J., 52, 66, 71–73, 87, 494 Ambraseys, N. N., 226, 229–231, 234, 259, 264, 275, Adria, 249, 250 277, 286, 288–290, 292, 296, 300, 301, 311, 321, Afar Triangle and triple junction, 226, 227, 231–233, 328, 334, 339, 341, 352, 353 237 Ammon, C. J., 464 Afghan (Helmand) block, 318 Amuri, New Zealand, earthquake of 1888 Mw 7–7.3, 486 Agadir, Morocco, earthquake of 1960 Ms 5.9, 243 Amurian Plate, 389, 399 Age of Enlightenment, 239 Anatolia Plate, 263, 268, 292, 293 Agua Blanca fault, Baja California, 107 Ancash, Peru, earthquake of 1946 M 6.3 to 6.9, 201 Aguilera, J., vii, 79, 138, 189 Ancón fault, Venezuela, 166 Airy, G.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedrock Geologic Map of the Monmouth Junction Quadrangle, Water Resources Management U.S
    DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Prepared in cooperation with the BEDROCK GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE MONMOUTH JUNCTION QUADRANGLE, WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SOMERSET, MIDDLESEX, AND MERCER COUNTIES, NEW JERSEY NEW JERSEY GEOLOGICAL AND WATER SURVEY NATIONAL GEOLOGIC MAPPING PROGRAM GEOLOGICAL MAP SERIES GMS 18-4 Cedar EXPLANATION OF MAP SYMBOLS cycle; lake level rises creating a stable deep lake environment followed by a fall in water level leading to complete Cardozo, N., and Allmendinger, R. W., 2013, Spherical projections with OSXStereonet: Computers & Geosciences, v. 51, p. 193 - 205, doi: 74°37'30" 35' Hill Cem 32'30" 74°30' 5 000m 5 5 desiccation of the lake. Within the Passaic Formation, organic-rick black and gray beds mark the deep lake 10.1016/j.cageo.2012.07.021. 32 E 33 34 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 490 000 FEET 542 40°30' 40°30' period, purple beds mark a shallower, slightly less organic-rich lake, and red beds mark a shallow oxygenated 6 Contacts 100 M Mettler lake in which most organic matter was oxidized. Olsen and others (1996) described the next longer cycle as the Christopher, R. A., 1979, Normapolles and triporate pollen assemblages from the Raritan and Magothy formations (Upper Cretaceous) of New 6 A 100 I 10 N Identity and existance certain, location accurate short modulating cycle, which is made up of five Van Houten cycles. The still longer in duration McLaughlin cycles Jersey: Palynology, v. 3, p. 73-121. S T 44 000m MWEL L RD 0 contain four short modulating cycles or 20 Van Houten cycles (figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Nureg/Cr-7238
    NUREG/CR-7238 Guidance Document: Conducting Paleoliquefaction Studies for Earthquake Source Characterization Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research AVAILABILITY OF REFERENCE MATERIALS IN NRC PUBLICATIONS NRC Reference Material Non-N RC Reference Material As of November 1999, you may electronically access Documents available from public and special technical NUREG-series publications and other NRC records at libraries include all open literature items, such as books, the NRC's Public Electronic Reading Room at journal articles, transactions, Federal Register notices, http://www. nrc. gov/reading-rm.html. Publicly released Federal and State legislation, and congressional reports. records include, to name a few, NUREG-series Such documents as theses, dissertations, foreign reports publications; Federal Register notices; applicant, and translations, and non-NRC conference proceedings licensee, and vendor documents and correspondence; may be purchased from their sponsoring organization. NRC correspondence and internal memoranda; bulletins Copies of industry codes and standards used in a and information notices; inspection and investigative substantive manner in the NRC regulatory process are reports; licensee event reports; and Commission papers maintained at- and their attachments. The NRC Technical Library NRC publications in the NUREG series, NRC Two White Flint North regulations, and Title 10, "Energy," in the Code of 11545 Rockville Pike Federal Regulations may also be purchased from one Rockville, MD 20852-2738 of these two sources. These standards are available in the library for reference 1. The Superintendent of Documents use by the public. Codes and standards are usually U.S. Government Publishing Office copyrighted and may be purchased from the originating Washington, DC 20402-0001 organization or, if they are American National Standards, from- Internet: http://bookstore.gpo.gov Telephone: American National Standards Institute 1-866-512-1800 11 West 42nd Street Fax: (202) 512-2104 New York, NY 10036-8002 http://www.ansi.org 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Universite Du Quebec a Chicoutimi
    UNIVERSITE DU QUEBEC A CHICOUTIMI CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHÏE ET PETROGRAPHIE DU COMPLEXE GNEISSIQUE DE CHICOUTIMI EN BORDURE DU COMPLEXE ANORTHOSITIQUE DU LAC ST-JEAN par MICHEL HERVET Département des Sciences Appliquées MEMOIRE PRESENTE EN VUE DE L'OBTENTION DE LA MAITRISE EN SCIENCES APPLIQUEES EN GEOLOGIE SEPTEMBRE 1986 UIUQAC bibliothèque Paul-Emile-Bouletj Mise en garde/Advice Afin de rendre accessible au plus Motivated by a desire to make the grand nombre le résultat des results of its graduate students' travaux de recherche menés par ses research accessible to all, and in étudiants gradués et dans l'esprit des accordance with the rules règles qui régissent le dépôt et la governing the acceptation and diffusion des mémoires et thèses diffusion of dissertations and produits dans cette Institution, theses in this Institution, the l'Université du Québec à Université du Québec à Chicoutimi (UQAC) est fière de Chicoutimi (UQAC) is proud to rendre accessible une version make a complete version of this complète et gratuite de cette œuvre. work available at no cost to the reader. L'auteur conserve néanmoins la The author retains ownership of the propriété du droit d'auteur qui copyright of this dissertation or protège ce mémoire ou cette thèse. thesis. Neither the dissertation or Ni le mémoire ou la thèse ni des thesis, nor substantial extracts from extraits substantiels de ceux-ci ne it, may be printed or otherwise peuvent être imprimés ou autrement reproduced without the author's reproduits sans son autorisation. permission. RESUME Le Complexe
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Earthquakes - 1985-86
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF CANADA PAPER 88-14 CANADIAN EARTHQUAKES - 1985-86 R.J. Wetmiller J. A. Drysdale R.B. Homer M. Lamontagne Energy, Mines and Energie, Mines et ••• Resources Canada Ressources Canada Canada THE ENERGY OF OUR RESOURCES THE POWER OF OUR IDEAS NOTE The format of the annual catalogue of Canadian earthquakes produced by the Geophysics Division and the Cordilleran and Pacific Geoscience Division of the Geological Survey of Canada has been chan­ ged with this edition. This catalogue covers two years of activity, only lists events with magnitude 4.0 or greater and is also available in a French version. Subsequent editions will be published every other year. More detailed information about Canadian earthquakes is available in the form of quarterly reports prepared by the Geological Survey. Enquiries about Canadian earthquakes, earthquake hazards or seis­ mological research in Canada should be directed to the Geophysics Division, 1 Observatory Crescent, Ottawa, Ontario, KIA OY3 (613-995-5548) or the Pacific Geoscience Centre, 9860 West Saanich Road, Sidney , B.C., V8L 4B2 (604-356-6500). GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF CANADA PAPER 88-14 Seismological Series Number 97 CANADIAN EARTHQUAKES - 1985-86 R.J. Wetmiller J. A. Drysdale R.B. Homer M. Lamontagne 1989 © Minister of Supply and Services Canada 1989 Available in Canada through authorized bookstore agents and other bookstores or by mail from Canadian Government Publishing Centre Supply and Services Canada Ottawa, Canada Kl A OS9 and from Geological Survey of Canada offices: 60 l Booth Street Ottawa, Canada Kl A OE8 3303-33rd Street N.W., Calgary, Alberta T2L 2A7 100 West Pender Street Vancouver, B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Analysis of the Magnitude of the February 1663 Earthquake at Charlevoix, Quebec
    A new analysis of the magnitude of the February 1663 earthquake at Charlevoix, Quebec Author: J. E. Ebel Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:107016 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Published in Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 1024-1038, 2011 These materials are made available for use in research, teaching and private study, pursuant to U.S. Copyright Law. The user must assume full responsibility for any use of the materials, including but not limited to, infringement of copyright and publication rights of reproduced materials. Any materials used for academic research or otherwise should be fully credited with the source. The publisher or original authors may retain copyright to the materials. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America This copy is for distribution only by the authors of the article and their institutions in accordance with the Open Access Policy of the Seismological Society of America. For more information see the publications section of the SSA website at www.seismosoc.org THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 400 Evelyn Ave., Suite 201 Albany, CA 94706-1375 (510) 525-5474; FAX (510) 525-7204 www.seismosoc.org Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 101, No. 3, pp. 1024–1038, June 2011, doi: 10.1785/0120100190 A New Analysis of the Magnitude of the February 1663 Earthquake at Charlevoix, Quebec by John E. Ebel Abstract This paper presents a new and comprehensive analysis of the magnitude of the 1663 Charlevoix, Quebec, earthquake. Based on a modified Mercalli intensity scale (MMI) of about VI from reports of damage to chimneys and a masonry wall in Roxbury and Boston, Massachusetts, the best estimate of the moment magnitude of this earthquake is M 7.3 to 7.9 from MMI attenuation relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Constraining the Holocene Extent of the Northwest Meers Fault, Oklahoma Using High-Resolution Topography and Paleoseismic Trenching
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses Summer 9-8-2017 Constraining the Holocene Extent of the Northwest Meers Fault, Oklahoma Using High-Resolution Topography and Paleoseismic Trenching Kristofer Tyler Hornsby Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Geology Commons, and the Geomorphology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Hornsby, Kristofer Tyler, "Constraining the Holocene Extent of the Northwest Meers Fault, Oklahoma Using High-Resolution Topography and Paleoseismic Trenching" (2017). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 3890. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.5778 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Constraining the Holocene Extent of the Northwest Meers Fault, Oklahoma Using High-Resolution Topography and Paleoseismic Trenching by Kristofer Tyler Hornsby A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science In Geology Thesis Committee: Ashley R. Streig, Chair Scott E.K. Bennett Adam M. Booth Portland State University 2017 ABSTRACT The Meers Fault (Oklahoma) is one of few seismogenic structures with Holocene surface expression in the stable continental region of North America. Only the ~37 km- long southeastern section of the ~55 km long Meers Fault is interpreted to be Holocene- active. The ~17 km-long northwestern section is considered to be Quaternary-active (pre- Holocene); however, its low-relief geomorphic expression and anthropogenic alteration have presented difficulties in evaluating the fault length and style of Holocene deformation.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6: Geological Activity and Earthquakes
    CK-12 Earth Science for Middle School FlexBook® 2.0 Answer Key Chapter 6: Geological Activity and Earthquakes 6.1 Geological Stresses Review Questions 1. What type of stress would you find at a transform fault? 2. What type of stress would you find at a subduction zone? 3. Under what conditions will a rock fracture? Answers 1. Shear 2. Compression 3. There is so much stress that the rock can’t deform elastically or plastically. 6.2 Principle of Horizontality Review Questions 1. Why are sediments laid down horizontally? 2. Why are sediments laid down from oldest to youngest? 3. Why are sedimentary rocks so good for studying the geology of a region? Answers 1. Gravity brings them into horizontal position. 2. For B to be above A, A had to have been there first. 3. They reveal the history of the area; e.g. if there was deformation or not. Explore More Questions 1. How is rock laid down? 2. What is the law of superposition? 3. Why is the law of superposition important? CK-12 Earth Science Middle School Answer Keys - updated July 2019 1 ​ 4. Where is the oldest rock found? 5. Where is the youngest rock found? 6. Why do we know that the fault is younger than the three rock layers? 7. Is the intrusion the youngest rock in the section? How do you know? Answers 1. Horizontally 2. The law that says that the oldest rock is on the bottom and the rocks get younger going upward if the section is not deformed.
    [Show full text]
  • Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment of the Meers Fault, Southwestern Oklahoma: Modeling and Uncertainties
    Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment of the Meers Fault, Southwestern Oklahoma: Modeling and Uncertainties Emma M. Baker and Austin A. Holland Special Publication SP2013-02 DRAFT REPORT MAY 16, 2013 OKLAHOMA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Sarkeys Energy Center 100 East Boyd St., Rm. N-131 Norman, Oklahoma 73019-0628 SPECIAL PUBLICATION SERIES The Oklahoma Geological Survey’s Special Publication series is designed to bring new geologic information to the public in a manner efficient in both time and cost. The material undergoes a minimum of editing and is published for the most part as a final, author-prepared report. Each publication is numbered according to the year in which it was published and the order of its publication within that year. Gaps in the series occur when a publication has gone out of print or when no applicable publications were issued in that year. This publication is issued by the Oklahoma Geological Survey as authorized by Title 70, Oklahoma Statutes, 1971, Section 3310, and Title 74, Oklahoma Statutes, 1971, Sections 231-238. This publication is only available as an electronic publication. 1. Table of Contents 2. Summary .................................................................................................................................................... 4 3. Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 5 3.1. Geologic Background ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoseismology of the Central Calaveras Fault, Furtado Ranch Site
    FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL ASEISMIC CREEP ALONG THE OUACHITA FRONTAL FAULT ZONE, SOUTHEASTERN OKLAHOMA Recipient: William Lettis & Associates, Inc. 1777 Botelho Drive, Suite 262 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Principal Investigators: Keith I. Kelson and Jeff S. Hoeft William Lettis & Associates, Inc. (tel: 925-256-6070; fax: 925-256-6076; email: [email protected]) Program Element III: Research on earthquake physics, occurrence, and effects U. S. Geological Survey National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program Award Number 03HQGR0030 October 2007 This research was supported by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Department of the Interior, under USGS award numbers 03HQGR0030. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Government. AWARD NO. 03HQGR0030 EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL ASEISMIC CREEP ALONG THE OUACHITA FRONTAL FAULT ZONE, SOUTHEASTERN OKLAHOMA Keith I. Kelson and Jeff S. Hoeft William Lettis & Associates, Inc.; 1777 Botelho Dr., Suite 262, Walnut Creek, CA 94596 (tel: 925-256-6070; fax: 925-256-6076; email: [email protected]) ABSTRACT Previously reported evidence of aseismic creep along the Choctaw fault in southeastern Oklahoma suggested the possibility of a potentially active fault associated with the southwestern part of the Ouachita Frontal fault zone (OFFZ). The OFFZ lies between two known active tectonic features in the mid- continent: the New Madrid seismic zone (NMSZ) in the Mississippi embayment, and the Meers fault in southwestern Oklahoma. Possible evidence of aseismic fault creep with left-lateral displacement was identified in the 1930s on the basis of deformed pipelines, curbs, and buildings within the town of Atoka, Oklahoma.
    [Show full text]
  • Data for Quaternary Faults, Liquefaction Features, and Possible Tectonic Features in the Central and Eastern United States, East of the Rocky Mountain Front
    U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Data for Quaternary faults, liquefaction features, and possible tectonic features in the Central and Eastern United States, east of the Rocky Mountain front By Anthony J. Crone and Russell L. Wheeler Open-File Report 00-260 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards nor with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 2000 Contents Abstract........................................................................................................................................1 Introduction..................................................................................................................................2 Strategy for Quaternary fault map and database .......................................................................10 Synopsis of Quaternary faulting and liquefaction features in the Central and Eastern United States..........................................................................................................................................14 Overview of Quaternary faults and liquefaction features.......................................................14 Discussion...............................................................................................................................15 Summary.................................................................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • Relationship Between Structures, Stress and Seismicity in The
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. ???, XXXX, DOI:10.1029/, 1 Relationship between structures, stress and 2 seismicity in the Charlevoix seismic zone revealed by 3 3-D geomechanical models: Implications for the 4 seismotectonics of continental interiors A. F. Baird, S. D. McKinnon, and L. Godin 5 Department of Geological Sciences and Geological Engineering, Queen's 6 University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada A. F. Baird, L. Godin, and S. D. McKinnon, Department of Geological Sciences and Geological Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6. ([email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]) D R A F T July 11, 2010, 11:16am D R A F T X - 2 BAIRD ET AL.: STRUCTURES, STRESS AND SEISMICITY IN THE CSZ 7 Abstract. The Charlevoix seismic zone in the St. Lawrence valley of Qu´ebec 8 is the most active in eastern Canada. The structurally complex region com- 9 prises a series of subparallel steeply dipping Iapetan rift faults, superimposed 10 by a 350 Ma meteorite impact structure, resulting in a heavily faulted vol- 11 ume. The elongate seismic zone runs through the crater parallel to the rift. 12 Most large events localize outside the crater and are consistent with slip along 13 the rift faults, whereas background seismicity primarily occurs within the 14 volume of rock bounded by the rift faults within and beneath the crater. The 15 interaction between rift and crater faults is explored using the three-dimensional 16 stress analysis code FLAC3D. The rift faults are represented by frictional 17 discontinuities and the crater by a bowl-shaped elastic volume of reduced 18 modulus.
    [Show full text]