ONEP V20.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ONEP V20.Pdf ONEP BIODIVERSITY SERIES volume twenty Compiled by Anong Chandrasrikul et al. ONEP BIODIVERSITY SERIES VOLUME TWENTY United Nations Development Programme 2011 Compiled by Anong Chandrasrikul et al. United Nations Development Programme 2011 Checklist of Mushrooms (Basidiomycetes) in Thailand First published: February 2011 by Offi ce of Natural Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning (ONEP), Thailand. ISBN: 978-974-286-858-1 This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profi t purposes without special permission from ONEP, providing that acknowledgment of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purposes. Citation: Chandrasrikul, A., P. Suwanarit, U. Sangwanit, S. Lumyong, A. Payapanon, N. Sanoamuang, C. Pukahuta, V. Petcharat, U. Sardsud, K. Duengkae, U. Klinhom, S. Thongkantha and S. Thongklam. 2011. Checklist of Mushrooms (Basidiomycetes) in Thailand. Offi ce of Natural Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning, Bangkok, Thailand. 448 p. Available from: Biological Diversity Division Offi ce of Natural Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment 60/1 Soi Phibunwattana 7, Rama VI Road, Bangkok 10400 Tel. / Fax: 0 2265 6638 - 9 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://chm-thai.onep.go.th Designed & Printed: Scand-Media Corporation Ltd. Tel.: 0 2943 7166-8 Fax: 0 2943 7169 Website: http://www.scandmedia.com Cover page: Cantharellus cinnabarinus Schw. Photo by: Niwat Sanoamuang Rear page: Schizophyllum commune Fr. Photo by: Poonpilai Suwanarit & Uthaiwan Sangwanit Map of Thailand 1 Mae Hong Son 21 Sakon Nakhon 41 Prachup Khiri Khan 60 Chon Buri 2 Chiang Mai 22 Nakhon Phanom 42 Chai Nat 61 Rayong 3 Chiang Rai 23 Mukdahan 43 Sing Buri 62 Chanthaburi 4 Phayao 24 Kalasin 44 Lop Buri 63 Trat 5 Nan 25 Maha Sarakham 45 Suphan Buri 64 Chumphon 6 Lamphun 26 Khon Kaen 46 Ang Thong 65 Ranong 7 Lampang 27 Bung Kan 47 Phra Nakhon 66 Surat Thani 8 Phrae 28 Chaiyaphum Si Ayutthaya 67 Phang Nga 9 Uttaradit 29 Nakhon Ratchasima 48 Saraburi 68 Phuket 10 Tak 30 Buri Ram 49 Nakhon Pathom 69 Krabi 11 Sukhothai 31 Surin 50 Pathum Thani 70 Nakhon Si Thammarat 12 Phitsanulok 32 Roi Et 51 Nakhon Nayok 71 Phatthalung 13 Kamphaeng Phet 33 Yasothon 52 Nonthaburi 72 Trang 14 Phichit 34 Amnat Charoen 53 Bangkok 73 Satun 15 Nakhon Sawan 35 Si Sa Ket 54 Samut Prakan 74 Songkhla 16 Phetchabun 36 Ubon Ratchathani 55 Samut Songkhram 75 Pattani 17 Loei 37 Uthai Thani 56 Samut Sakhon 76 Yala 18 Nong Bua Lam Phu 38 Kanchanaburi 57 Sa Kaeo 77 Narathiwat 19 Udon Thani 39 Ratchaburi 58 Prachin Buri 20 Nong Khai 40 Phetchaburi 59 Chachoengsao i Foreword Mushrooms are some of our most valuable biological resources. They can be found throughout Thailand. For the Thai people, mushrooms off er a variety of traditional uses and benefi ts. Mushrooms are a rich source of protein. They provide therapeutic and medicinal benefi ts because of their herbal properties. Mushroom farming also generates incomes for farming families. Since 1967, mushrooms have been the subject of many studies, with many mushroom species collected as part of eff orts to gather valuable information with regards their taxonomy and uses. The data have been collected by diff erent agencies and researchers. But as the data have never been compiled in one central location, data on the exact number of mushrooms in Thailand, their respective locations, and the identities of collectors and researchers have not been systematically arranged and have become unavailable. Moreover there has been duplication in the designation of names for diff erent mushroom species. This Checklist of Mushrooms (Basidiomycetes) in Thailand contains 1,978 species found throughout the country. Information on mushroom species in Thailand has been compiled and validated against the Ninth Edition of the Dictionary of Fungi. This Checklist provides information on common names, Thai names, ecology, dispersion, and references. On behalf of the Offi ce of Natural Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning, I hope that this Checklist will generate new interest to carry out further studies on mushrooms in Thailand in the near future. I would like to express my gratitude to the compilers of this Checklist, especially Ms. Anong Chandrasrikul, who chaired the brainstorming working group consisting of experts from government agencies, academic institutions, and the private sector. My thanks also go to all those who have devoted themselves to this work and contributed to its completion. ONEP would like to thank the Global Environment Facility (GEF) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) for their kind fi nancial support and administrative assistance to the compilation and production of this publication, Checklist of Mushrooms (Basidiomycetes) in Thailand. Mrs. Nisakorn Kositratna Secretary General Offi ce of Natural Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment ii Acknowledgement This checklist of Mushrooms (Basidiomycetes) in Thailand was compiled from references, specimens in museums, and brainstorming of experts. It would not have been possible without great collaboration of all the people who contributed and worked on it. We would like to take this opportunity to thank all of you. Finally, we would like to thank Offi ce of Natural Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning and staff of Biological Diversity Division, for supporting and putting a lot of eff ort into this publication. iii Amanita hemibapha (Berk.&Br.) Sacc. Amanita vaginata (Bull. ex Fr.) Vittadini Photo by: Kittima Duengkae Photo by: Niwat Sanoamuang Calocera viscosa (Pers. ex Fr.) Fr. Campanella junghuhnii (Mont.) Singer Photo by: Niwat Sanoamuang Photo by: Poonpilai Suwanarit & Uthaiwan Sangwanit Cantharellus cinnabarinus var. australiensis Schw. Clel. Cantharellus cibarius Fries Photo by: Poonpilai Suwanarit & Uthaiwan Sangwanit Photo by: Poonpilai Suwanarit & Uthaiwan Sangwanit Chlorophyllum molybdites (Meyer ex Fr. ) Massee Clavaria zollingeri Lév. Photo by: Poonpilai Suwanarit & Uthaiwan Sangwanit Photo by: Poonpilai Suwanarit & Uthaiwan Sangwanit iv Clavaria rosea Fr. Coprinus disseminatus (Pers. & Fr.) S.F. Gray Photo by: Niwat Sanoamuang Photo by: Poonpilai Suwanarit & Uthaiwan Sangwanit Cyathus striatus (Huds.) Willd. & Pers. Cymatoderma dendriticum (Pers.) D.A. Reid Photo by: Niwat Sanoamuang Photo by: Niwat Sanoamuang Filoboletus manipularis (Berk.) Sing. Dacryopinax spathularia (Schwein.) Martin Photo by: Poonpilai Suwanarit & Uthaiwan Sangwanit Photo by: Niwat Sanoamuang Gymnopilus aeruginosa (Peck ) Sing. Heinemannomyces splendidissima Watling Photo by: Poonpilai Suwanarit & Uthaiwan Sangwanit Photo by: Poonpilai Suwanarit & Uthaiwan Sangwanit v Lentinus sajor-caju (Fr.) Fr. Lentinus squarrosulus Mont. Photo by: Poonpilai Suwanarit & Uthaiwan Sangwanit Photo by: Poonpilai Suwanarit & Uthaiwan Sangwanit Lenzites elegans (Fr.) Pat. Nidula niveotomentosa (Henn.) Lloyd Photo by: Poonpilai Suwanarit & Uthaiwan Sangwanit Photo by: Poonpilai Suwanarit & Uthaiwan Sangwanit Lycoperdon echinatum Persoon ex Persoon Photo by: Niwat Sanoamuang Macrocybe crassa (Berk.) Pegler & Lodge Photo by: Poonpilai Suwanarit & Uthaiwan Sangwanit Mutinus bambusinus (Zoll.) Fisch. Phellinus pomaceus (Pers.) Maire Photo by: Poonpilai Suwanarit & Uthaiwan Sangwanit Photo by: Usa Klinhom vi Phylloporus orientalis var. brevisporus Corner Ramaria botrytoides (Reck.) Quél Photo by: Niwat Sanoamuang Photo by: Niwat Sanoamuang Russula emetica Pers. ex S.F.Gray Russula cyanoxantha (Schaeff .) Fr. Photo by: Poonpilai Suwanarit & Uthaiwan Sangwanit Photo by: Usa Klinhom Stereum ostrea (Blume & Nees) Fries Suillus luteus (L. & Fr.) S.F. Gray Photo by: Poonpilai Suwanarit & Uthaiwan Sangwanit Photo by: Kittima Duengkae Termitomyces globulus Heim & Goossens Termitomyces eurhizus (Berk.) R. Heim Photo by: Poonpilai Suwanarit & Uthaiwan Sangwanit Photo by: Usa Klinhom vii Contents Foreword ...............................................................................................................................................ii Acknowledgement .......................................................................................................................iii Order Agaricales ............................................................................................................................1 Family Agaricaceae .........................................................................................................................1 Family Bolbitiaceae .....................................................................................................................15 Family Clavariaceae ....................................................................................................................21 Family Coprinaceae ....................................................................................................................33 Family Cortinariaceae ................................................................................................................38 Family Entolomataceae ............................................................................................................49 Family Fistulinaceae ....................................................................................................................54 Family Hydnangiaceae .............................................................................................................54
Recommended publications
  • Strážovské Vrchy Mts., Resort Podskalie; See P. 12)
    a journal on biodiversity, taxonomy and conservation of fungi No. 7 March 2006 Tricholoma dulciolens (Strážovské vrchy Mts., resort Podskalie; see p. 12) ISSN 1335-7670 Catathelasma 7: 1-36 (2006) Lycoperdon rimulatum (Záhorská nížina Lowland, Mikulášov; see p. 5) Cotylidia pannosa (Javorníky Mts., Dolná Mariková – Kátlina; see p. 22) March 2006 Catathelasma 7 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS BIODIVERSITY OF FUNGI Lycoperdon rimulatum, a new Slovak gasteromycete Mikael Jeppson 5 Three rare tricholomoid agarics Vladimír Antonín and Jan Holec 11 Macrofungi collected during the 9th Mycological Foray in Slovakia Pavel Lizoň 17 Note on Tricholoma dulciolens Anton Hauskknecht 34 Instructions to authors 4 Editor's acknowledgements 4 Book notices Pavel Lizoň 10, 34 PHOTOGRAPHS Tricholoma dulciolens Vladimír Antonín [1] Lycoperdon rimulatum Mikael Jeppson [2] Cotylidia pannosa Ladislav Hagara [2] Microglossum viride Pavel Lizoň [35] Mycena diosma Vladimír Antonín [35] Boletopsis grisea Petr Vampola [36] Albatrellus subrubescens Petr Vampola [36] visit our web site at fungi.sav.sk Catathelasma is published annually/biannually by the Slovak Mycological Society with the financial support of the Slovak Academy of Sciences. Permit of the Ministry of Culture of the Slovak rep. no. 2470/2001, ISSN 1335-7670. 4 Catathelasma 7 March 2006 Instructions to Authors Catathelasma is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to the biodiversity, taxonomy and conservation of fungi. Papers are in English with Slovak/Czech summaries. Elements of an Article Submitted to Catathelasma: • title: informative and concise • author(s) name(s): full first and last name (addresses as footnote) • key words: max. 5 words, not repeating words in the title • main text: brief introduction, methods (if needed), presented data • illustrations: line drawings and color photographs • list of references • abstract in Slovak or Czech: max.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks Bioblitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 ON THIS PAGE Photograph of BioBlitz participants conducting data entry into iNaturalist. Photograph courtesy of the National Park Service. ON THE COVER Photograph of BioBlitz participants collecting aquatic species data in the Presidio of San Francisco. Photograph courtesy of National Park Service. The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 Elizabeth Edson1, Michelle O’Herron1, Alison Forrestel2, Daniel George3 1Golden Gate Parks Conservancy Building 201 Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94129 2National Park Service. Golden Gate National Recreation Area Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1061 Sausalito, CA 94965 3National Park Service. San Francisco Bay Area Network Inventory & Monitoring Program Manager Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1063 Sausalito, CA 94965 March 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix K. Survey and Manage Species Persistence Evaluation
    Appendix K. Survey and Manage Species Persistence Evaluation Establishment of the 95-foot wide construction corridor and TEWAs would likely remove individuals of H. caeruleus and modify microclimate conditions around individuals that are not removed. The removal of forests and host trees and disturbance to soil could negatively affect H. caeruleus in adjacent areas by removing its habitat, disturbing the roots of host trees, and affecting its mycorrhizal association with the trees, potentially affecting site persistence. Restored portions of the corridor and TEWAs would be dominated by early seral vegetation for approximately 30 years, which would result in long-term changes to habitat conditions. A 30-foot wide portion of the corridor would be maintained in low-growing vegetation for pipeline maintenance and would not provide habitat for the species during the life of the project. Hygrophorus caeruleus is not likely to persist at one of the sites in the project area because of the extent of impacts and the proximity of the recorded observation to the corridor. Hygrophorus caeruleus is likely to persist at the remaining three sites in the project area (MP 168.8 and MP 172.4 (north), and MP 172.5-172.7) because the majority of observations within the sites are more than 90 feet from the corridor, where direct effects are not anticipated and indirect effects are unlikely. The site at MP 168.8 is in a forested area on an east-facing slope, and a paved road occurs through the southeast part of the site. Four out of five observations are more than 90 feet southwest of the corridor and are not likely to be directly or indirectly affected by the PCGP Project based on the distance from the corridor, extent of forests surrounding the observations, and proximity to an existing open corridor (the road), indicating the species is likely resilient to edge- related effects at the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Clades of Agaricales: a Multilocus Phylogenetic Overview
    Mycologia, 98(6), 2006, pp. 982–995. # 2006 by The Mycological Society of America, Lawrence, KS 66044-8897 Major clades of Agaricales: a multilocus phylogenetic overview P. Brandon Matheny1 Duur K. Aanen Judd M. Curtis Laboratory of Genetics, Arboretumlaan 4, 6703 BD, Biology Department, Clark University, 950 Main Street, Wageningen, The Netherlands Worcester, Massachusetts, 01610 Matthew DeNitis Vale´rie Hofstetter 127 Harrington Way, Worcester, Massachusetts 01604 Department of Biology, Box 90338, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 Graciela M. Daniele Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biologı´a Vegetal, M. Catherine Aime CONICET-Universidad Nacional de Co´rdoba, Casilla USDA-ARS, Systematic Botany and Mycology de Correo 495, 5000 Co´rdoba, Argentina Laboratory, Room 304, Building 011A, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-2350 Dennis E. Desjardin Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, Jean-Marc Moncalvo San Francisco, California 94132 Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, Royal Ontario Museum and Department of Botany, University Bradley R. Kropp of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2C6 Canada Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322 Zai-Wei Ge Zhu-Liang Yang Lorelei L. Norvell Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Pacific Northwest Mycology Service, 6720 NW Skyline Sciences, Kunming 650204, P.R. China Boulevard, Portland, Oregon 97229-1309 Jason C. Slot Andrew Parker Biology Department, Clark University, 950 Main Street, 127 Raven Way, Metaline Falls, Washington 99153- Worcester, Massachusetts, 01609 9720 Joseph F. Ammirati Else C. Vellinga University of Washington, Biology Department, Box Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, 111 355325, Seattle, Washington 98195 Koshland Hall, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3102 Timothy J.
    [Show full text]
  • Candy Cap Odor – the Mystery Solved by D
    The Mycological Society of San Francisco • Feb. 2016, vol. 67:06 Table of Contents FEBRUARY 16 General Meeting Speaker Mushroom of the Month by K. Litchfield 1 President Post by B. Wenck-Reilly 2 Stefan Catona California State Mushroom by J. Shay 2 ’Shrooms in San Diego?!? by Eric Multhaup 5 Sweating the Small Stuff by D. Arora & W. So 6 Culinary Corner by H. Lunan 7 Candy Cap Odor – The Mystery Solved by D. Deshazer 8 Academic Quadrant by J. Shay 9 FF Postscript: An Unsung Hero by C. Hellums 12 Announcements / Events 13 Cultivation Quarters by K. Litchfield 14 Mushroom Sightings 16 Calendar & Hospitality 17 Armillaria gallica: An Exe Island Odyssey Colonies of the species Armillaria gallica— a “honey Mushroom of the Month: mushroom”—are among the largest and oldest organ- Candy Cap: Lactarius rubidus and rufulus isms on the planet. Arising from a single mating event by Ken Litchfield between two haploid mycelia, individuals of this spe- cies extend vast networks of mycelial cords, called “rhi- Northern California is blessed with the candy cap mush- zomorphs”, across the forest floor, opportunistically room, an endemic fungal treat not found in the rest of the country. infecting hardwood tree root systems. This sweet little copper-top mushroom is packed with an extraordi- Armillaria species have caused billions of dollars in nary flavoring agent most folks find indistinguishable from maple losses to the lumber industry, yet little is known about syrup, but without all the high overhead tree tapping and sap boil- the growth dynamics of these fungi because of the cryptic nature of mycelium, which is hidden in the soil ing required to make the syrup in nonlocal New England.
    [Show full text]
  • MMA MASTERLIST - Sorted Alphabetically
    MMA MASTERLIST - Sorted Alphabetically Sunday, December 10, 20Taxa Count: 2115 Page 1 of 26 Agaricus abruptibulbus Amanita amerimuscaria Agaricus arvensis Amanita amerirubescens nom. prov. Agaricus campestris Amanita atkinsoniana Agaricus haemorrhoidarius Amanita aureosolea nom. prov. Agaricus micromegethus Amanita battarrae Agaricus pattersonae Amanita bisporigera Agaricus placomyces Amanita brunnescens Agaricus semotus Amanita ceciliae Agaricus silvaticus Amanita cinereoconia Agaricus silvicola Amanita citrina Agaricus sp. Amanita citrina f. lavendula Agaricus subrutilescens Amanita cokeri Agaricus xanthrodermus Amanita cothurnata Agrocybe acericola Amanita crenulata Agrocybe aegerita Amanita crocea Agrocybe dura Amanita elongata Agrocybe erebia Amanita excelsa var. spissa Agrocybe firma Amanita farinosa Agrocybe pediades Amanita flavoconia Agrocybe praecox Amanita flavorubens Agrocybe sp. Amanita flavorubescens Agrocybe tabacina Amanita frostiana Albatrellus caeruleoporus Amanita fulva var. alba Albatrellus confluens Amanita fulva var. crassivolvata Albatrellus ovinus Amanita gemmata Albatrellus sp. Amanita jacksonii Alboleptonia sericella Amanita longipes Albugo candida Amanita murrilliana Aleuria aurantia Amanita onusta Aleuria rhenana Amanita pantherina, cf. Aleurodiscus amorphus Amanita phalloides Aleurodiscus oakesii Amanita porphyria Amanita abrupta Amanita praecox nom. prov. Amanita aestivalis Amanita pseudovolvata nom. prov. Amanita albocreata Amanita RET T01 Amanita amerifulva nom. prov. Amanita ristichii Amanita rubescens
    [Show full text]
  • Los Alamos National Laboratory, Bandelier National Monument, and Los Alamos County
    LA-13384-MS A Survey of Macromycete Diversity at Los Alamos National Laboratory, Bandelier National Monument, and Los Alamos County A Preliminary Report Los Alamos NATIONAL LABORATORY Los Alamos National Laboratory is operated by the University of California for the United States Department of Energy under contract W-7405-ENG-36. Edited by Hector Hinojosa, Group CIC-1 Photocomposition by Belinda Gutierrez, Group ESH-20 Cover: A fire road leading away from the Pajarito Ski Hill area where high-altitude surveys took place. (Photo by Fran J. Rogers.) An Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither The Regents of the University of California, the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by The Regents of the University of California, the United States Government, or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of The Regents of the University of California, the United States Government, or any agency thereof. Los Alamos National Laboratory strongly supports academic freedom and a researcher's right to publish; as an institution, however, the Laboratory does not endorse the viewpoint of a publication or guarantee its technical correctness.
    [Show full text]
  • Reviewing the World's Edible Mushroom Species: a New
    Received: 5 September 2020 Revised: 4 December 2020 Accepted: 21 December 2020 DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.12708 COMPREHENSIVE REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND FOOD SAFETY Reviewing the world’s edible mushroom species: A new evidence-based classification system Huili Li1,2,3 Yang Tian4 Nelson Menolli Jr5,6 Lei Ye1,2,3 Samantha C. Karunarathna1,2,3 Jesus Perez-Moreno7 Mohammad Mahmudur Rahman8 Md Harunur Rashid8 Pheng Phengsintham9 Leela Rizal10 Taiga Kasuya11 Young Woon Lim12 Arun Kumar Dutta13 Abdul Nasir Khalid14 Le Thanh Huyen15 Marilen Parungao Balolong16 Gautam Baruah17 Sumedha Madawala18 Naritsada Thongklang19,20 Kevin D. Hyde19,20,21 Paul M. Kirk22 Jianchu Xu1,2,3 Jun Sheng23 Eric Boa24 Peter E. Mortimer1,3 1 CAS Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, China 2 East and Central Asia Regional Office, World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Kunming, Yunnan, China 3 Centre for Mountain Futures, Kunming Institute of Botany, Kunming, Yunnan, China 4 College of Food Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, Yunnan, China 5 Núcleo de Pesquisa em Micologia, Instituto de Botânica, São Paulo, Brazil 6 Departamento de Ciências da Natureza e Matemática (DCM), Subárea de Biologia (SAB), Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de São Paulo (IFSP), São Paulo, Brazil 7 Colegio de Postgraduados, Campus Montecillo, Texcoco, México 8 Global Centre for Environmental Remediation (GCER), Faculty of Science, The University of Newcastle,
    [Show full text]
  • Los Hongos Agaricales De Las Áreas De Encino Del Estado De Baja California, México Nahara Ayala-Sánchez Universidad Autónoma De Baja California
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Estudios en Biodiversidad Parasitology, Harold W. Manter Laboratory of 2015 Los hongos Agaricales de las áreas de encino del estado de Baja California, México Nahara Ayala-Sánchez Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Irma E. Soria-Mercado Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Leticia Romero-Bautista Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo Maritza López-Herrera Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo Roxana Rico-Mora Universidad Autónoma de Baja California See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biodiversidad Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Botany Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Ayala-Sánchez, Nahara; Soria-Mercado, Irma E.; Romero-Bautista, Leticia; López-Herrera, Maritza; Rico-Mora, Roxana; and Portillo- López, Amelia, "Los hongos Agaricales de las áreas de encino del estado de Baja California, México" (2015). Estudios en Biodiversidad. 19. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biodiversidad/19 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Parasitology, Harold W. Manter Laboratory of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Estudios en Biodiversidad by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Authors Nahara Ayala-Sánchez, Irma E. Soria-Mercado, Leticia Romero-Bautista, Maritza López-Herrera, Roxana Rico-Mora, and Amelia Portillo-López This article is available at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biodiversidad/19 Los hongos Agaricales de las áreas de encino del estado de Baja California, México Nahara Ayala-Sánchez, Irma E. Soria-Mercado, Leticia Romero-Bautista, Maritza López-Herrera, Roxana Rico-Mora, y Amelia Portillo-López Resumen Se realizó una recopilación de las especies de hongos del orden Agaricales (regionalmente conocido como “agaricoides”) de los bosques Quercus spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of MSDIN Family Members in Amanitin-Producing Mushrooms
    He et al. BMC Genomics (2020) 21:440 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-06857-8 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Diversity of MSDIN family members in amanitin-producing mushrooms and the phylogeny of the MSDIN and prolyl oligopeptidase genes Zhengmi He, Pan Long, Fang Fang, Sainan Li, Ping Zhang and Zuohong Chen* Abstract Background: Amanitin-producing mushrooms, mainly distributed in the genera Amanita, Galerina and Lepiota, possess MSDIN gene family for the biosynthesis of many cyclopeptides catalysed by prolyl oligopeptidase (POP). Recently, transcriptome sequencing has proven to be an efficient way to mine MSDIN and POP genes in these lethal mushrooms. Thus far, only A. palloides and A. bisporigera from North America and A. exitialis and A. rimosa from Asia have been studied based on transcriptome analysis. However, the MSDIN and POP genes of many amanitin-producing mushrooms in China remain unstudied; hence, the transcriptomes of these speices deserve to be analysed. Results: In this study, the MSDIN and POP genes from ten Amanita species, two Galerina species and Lepiota venenata were studied and the phylogenetic relationships of their MSDIN and POP genes were analysed. Through transcriptome sequencing and PCR cloning, 19 POP genes and 151 MSDIN genes predicted to encode 98 non- duplicated cyclopeptides, including α-amanitin, β-amanitin, phallacidin, phalloidin and 94 unknown peptides, were found in these species. Phylogenetic analysis showed that (1) MSDIN genes generally clustered depending on the taxonomy of the genus, while Amanita MSDIN genes clustered depending on the chemical substance; and (2) the POPA genes of Amanita, Galerina and Lepiota clustered and were separated into three different groups, but the POPB genes of the three distinct genera were clustered in a highly supported monophyletic group.
    [Show full text]
  • Mushrumors the Newsletter of the Northwest Mushroomers Association Volume 20 Issue 3 September - November 2009
    MushRumors The Newsletter of the Northwest Mushroomers Association Volume 20 Issue 3 September - November 2009 2009 Mushroom Season Blasts into October with a Flourish A Surprising Turnout at the Annual Fall Show by Our Fungal Friends, and a Visit by David Arora Highlighted this Extraordinary Year for the Northwest Mushroomers On the heels of a year where the weather in Northwest Washington could be described as anything but nor- mal, to the surprise of many, include yours truly, it was actually a good year for mushrooms and the Northwest Mushroomers Association shined again at our traditional fall exhibit. The members, as well as the mushrooms, rose to the occasion, despite brutal conditions for collecting which included a sideways driving rain (which we photo by Pam Anderson thought had come too late), and even a thunderstorm, as we prepared to gather for the greatly anticipated sorting of our catch at the hallowed Bloedel Donovan Community Building. I wondered, not without some trepidation, about what fungi would actually show up for this years’ event. Buck McAdoo, Dick Morrison, and I had spent several harrowing hours some- what lost in the woods off the South Pass Road in a torrential downpour, all the while being filmed for posterity by Buck’s step-son, Travis, a videographer creating a documentary about mushrooming. I had to wonder about the resolve of our mem- bers to go forth in such conditions in or- In This Issue: Fabulous first impressions: Marjorie Hooks der to find the mush- David Arora Visits Bellingham crafted another artwork for the centerpiece.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Checklist of Arizona Macrofungi
    A PRELIMINARY CHECKLIST OF ARIZONA MACROFUNGI Scott T. Bates School of Life Sciences Arizona State University PO Box 874601 Tempe, AZ 85287-4601 ABSTRACT A checklist of 1290 species of nonlichenized ascomycetaceous, basidiomycetaceous, and zygomycetaceous macrofungi is presented for the state of Arizona. The checklist was compiled from records of Arizona fungi in scientific publications or herbarium databases. Additional records were obtained from a physical search of herbarium specimens in the University of Arizona’s Robert L. Gilbertson Mycological Herbarium and of the author’s personal herbarium. This publication represents the first comprehensive checklist of macrofungi for Arizona. In all probability, the checklist is far from complete as new species await discovery and some of the species listed are in need of taxonomic revision. The data presented here serve as a baseline for future studies related to fungal biodiversity in Arizona and can contribute to state or national inventories of biota. INTRODUCTION Arizona is a state noted for the diversity of its biotic communities (Brown 1994). Boreal forests found at high altitudes, the ‘Sky Islands’ prevalent in the southern parts of the state, and ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa P.& C. Lawson) forests that are widespread in Arizona, all provide rich habitats that sustain numerous species of macrofungi. Even xeric biomes, such as desertscrub and semidesert- grasslands, support a unique mycota, which include rare species such as Itajahya galericulata A. Møller (Long & Stouffer 1943b, Fig. 2c). Although checklists for some groups of fungi present in the state have been published previously (e.g., Gilbertson & Budington 1970, Gilbertson et al. 1974, Gilbertson & Bigelow 1998, Fogel & States 2002), this checklist represents the first comprehensive listing of all macrofungi in the kingdom Eumycota (Fungi) that are known from Arizona.
    [Show full text]