Lithuanian Collectors Coins

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lithuanian Collectors Coins Lithuanian Collectors Coins Muscovite army was much larger and this in part was the reason for the subsequent glory ing news of the victory to all corners of the country. Some of the captives were sent even of this victory. Konstanty Ostrogski after this battle was lauded as a great military leader, further, to the European capitals, not only to proclaim the victory, but to forcibly demon- 50 LITAS COIN DEDICATED because it was his decisions (as well those of Jerzy Radziwiłł) that led to success in the bat- strate to Catholic Europe the new danger of Moscow. TO THE 500TH ANNIVERSARY tle eld. Historians agree that the victory was achieved in large part due to the tactics of the Lithuanians — with one deceptive manoeuvre they were able to break up the enemy for- This is the rst propaganda campaign of this scale from Lithuania and Poland; it helped OF THE BATTLE OF ORSHA mation. Another reason for this success was ingenious use of the artillery (the artillerymen establish Lithuania and Poland’s position in Catholic Europe as the “Christian shield (wall)”. The hope was that these measures, referring to the symbolic victory, would assemble an Silver Ag 925 were mostly German) — this was practically the rst time in the history of the GDL that the Quality proof artillery played such a key role in a battle. But even more important was the fact that international coalition in the war with the Muscovites, as was done in ghting the Turks. Diameter 38.61 mm. the ruler was able to bring together the Polish and Lithuanian forces. Together with These e orts bore fruit very quickly. The treaty between Moscow and the Holy Ro- Weight 28.28 g the Lithuanians and Ruthenians, Polish mercenary infantry and volunteer troops man Empire collapsed, and in 1515 the Holy Roman Emperor Maximilian I met took part in the battle and contributed signi cantly to the victory. Also, many with the Jagiellons in Vienna. Therefore, the most important result of the battle The edge of the coin — symbols of the Polish rotmistrz squires (e.g. Janusz Świerczowski) were known at the of Orsha was undoubtedly its diplomatic victory. Designed by Rolandas Rimkūnas and Giedrius Paulauskis ruler’s court and in the army from the end of the 15th c. and had close ties with In speaking about Lithuania, it should be said that this victory gave it a Mintage 3,000 pcs. representatives of Lithuania’s political elite. Issued 2014 much-needed respite from the di cult war with Moscow. Although Smolensk According to the customs of the time, the victor was always the ruler, even wasn’t retaken, a certain balance of power was achieved and there were no Information is available at the Bank of Lithuania if he did not personally take part in the battle. On 27 September, Sigismund’s more major losses. Magnate Ostrogski, having returned to Vilnius, ful lled the Tel. (85) 268 0316 triumphal procession took place in Vilnius, the capital city (Ostrogski only came vows he made before the battle: despite the ban on the construction of new Or- E-mail [email protected] back as victor when all military actions were over, at the end of December). Vilnius thodox places of worship, under his care and the consent of the ruler, the Orthodox www.lb.lt Cathedral, as was customary, displayed the captured Muscovite ags. Already from the churches of St. Nicholas and of the Holy Trinity were built in Vilnius. A few years later, for military camp the ruler sent out the rst letter to his brother Ladislaus Jagiellon, king of his merits in the wars with Moscow, the ruler made him Voivod of Trakai, one of the highest TH Hungary and Bohemia, to the Roman Pope, the Doge of Venice and other addressees at positions in the country and previously unavailable to Orthodox believers. The coin was minted at the 50 LITAS COIN DEDICATED TO THE 500 ANNIVERSARY OF THE BATTLE OF ORSHA home and abroad. This was a European tradition, declaring the victory on the battle eld. UAB Lithuanian Mint These letters were the rst in an international information campaign, later known as the The Battle of Orsha was a military and diplomatic victory of the Jagiellon dynasty. It is www.lithuanian-mint.lt “Orsha propaganda”. The letter to Pope Leo X was published in Rome and Krakow that mentioned in European news publications of the time, as well as in more detailed descrip- tions. In the GDL’s public memory, Orsha remained as a symbol of victory; it was remem- Lithuanian Collectors Coins same year. © Bank of Lithuania, 2014 th bered in all of the recurring wars with Russia. In the mid-17 c., Wojciech Wijuk Kojałowicz The coins were photographed by Arūnas Baltėnas The Grand Duke of Moscow, Vasili III, refused to pay ransom for the captives, which in- wrote that even now on the battle eld there still remain “many great mounds where the Designed by Liudas Parulskis cluded all of Moscow’s military commanders (including their leader — Ivan Chelyadnin). fallen soldiers of Moscow are buried”. The publication uses photographs from the archives of the National Museum in Warsaw, He announced that they are all considered as dead. The captives took part in the triumphal Bila Tserkva Ethnographic Museum and Wikimedia.org Prof. Dr. Rimvydas Petrauskas procession in Vilnius and later were sent out to fortresses throughout the GDL, thus bring- Published by the Bank of Lithuania, Gedimino pr. 6, LT-01103 Vilnius Printed by UAB Lodvila, www.lodvila.lt Illustrations: 1) Contemporary painting of the Battle of Orsha (from the National Museum in Warsaw) 2) Portrait of Grand Hetman Konstanty Ostrogski (from the 17th c., but thought to be based Portrait of Duke Konstanty Ostrogski; oil, canvas; 18th c., unknown painter; Bila Tserkva Battle of Orsha Ethnographic Museum (Ukraine) On 8 September 1514, the armies of two great duchies — Lithuania and Moscow — faced each other at the battle of Orsha. This was undoubtedly the not far from the GDL castle of Orsha, near the Krapivna River. The battle most signi cant event in the wars between Lithuania and Moscow at the end took place on 8 September — the date of the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin of the 15th c.–early 16th c. These wars began in 1492, when the army of Mos- Mary. In those times, battles were not only a test of the soldiers, but were cow, after a long period of peace, took advantage of the ambiguous interreg- also seen as God’s judgement; therefore, ending the battle on this date of num situation after the death of the Polish-Lithuanian ruler Casimir IV Jagiel- an important church holiday was supposed to be a sign — the righteous lon, invaded the territory of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania (GDL). The ruler of would win. At this decisive stage, the army of the GDL was under the com- Moscow, Ivan III, for some time had fostered plans to occupy the Orthodox mand of Hetman Konstanty Ostrogski, because the ruler and his escort lands of the GDL in accordance to the ideological doctrine that considered stayed behind at the military camp near Borisov. Sources testify that the Moscow as the “Third Rome” — defender of allegedly persecuted Orthodox Ruthenian-born Orthodox Magnate Ostrogski prayed before the battle. He believers. was already familiar with the bitter taste of defeat — 14 years ago, in 1500, near Vedrosha, not only the Lithuanian army that he commanded lost the The wars that began in 1492 were unsuccessful for Lithuania. One after an- battle, but he himself, along with a group of high-born Lithuanians, was other the lands of Gomel, Starodub and Chernigov were lost, until the truce captured by the Muscovites. Now the duke hoped for the intercession of in 1503 saw almost a quarter of the territory of the GDL lost. Although these God and the Blessed Virgin Mary and in return for a victory promised to were distant and poorly populated areas, the war zone was approaching the build new Orthodox churches. nucleus of the Lithuanian State. Attempts were made to stop the attacks from Moscow by employing marital diplomacy, common in those times. In 1495, As it often is, the exact number of those who took part in the battle is the Grand Duke of Lithuania, Alexander Jagiellon, married Helena, daughter unknown. In a letter written not long after the battle, Sigismund mentions of Ivan III. But these hopes for peace were not destined to come to pass. 80 thousand enemy soldiers, and this is the number that lived in on in lit- erature. Still, this gure should be viewed with caution. It was characteristic At that time, the nature of war was very di erent from modern wars — there of the period to exaggerate the number of the enemy and their losses; in was no long-term war front, but rather periodic invasions of armies into en- general, liberties were taken with all numbers. There is no doubt that the emy territory, followed by temporary truces. In 1514, Moscow’s army once again attacked the lands of the GDL. After a long siege they were able to cap- Battle of Orsha; circa 1524–1530; oil, tempera; wood panel; ture Smolensk, and this was the most severe loss over this whole war period. 165 x 260; Unknown painter, follower of Cranach, Lucas the The army of the GDL, led by Sigismund the Old, king of Poland and Grand Elder (1472–1553); Photo: Ligier Piotr; National Museum in Duke of Lithuania, set out to prevent any further onslaught.
Recommended publications
  • Senatus Aulicus. the Rivalry of Political Factions During the Reign of Sigismund I (1506–1548)
    Jacek Brzozowski Wydział Historyczno-Socjologiczny Uniwersytet w Białymstoku Senatus aulicus. The rivalry of political factions during the reign of Sigismund I (1506–1548) When studying the history of the reign of Sigismund I, it is possible to observe that in exercising power the monarch made use of a very small and trusted circle of senators1. In fact, a greater number of them stayed with the King only during Sejm sessions, although this was never a full roster of sena- tors. In the years 1506–1540 there was a total of 35 Sejms. Numerically the largest group of senators was present in 1511 (56 people), while the average attendance was no more than 302. As we can see throughout the whole exa- mined period it is possible to observe a problem with senators’ attendance, whereas ministers were present at all the Sejms and castellans had the worst attendance record with absenteeism of more than 80%3. On December 15, 1534 1 This type of situation was not specific to the reign of Sigismund I. As Jan Długosz reports, during the Sejm in Sieradz in 1425, in a situation of attacks of the knights against the Council, the monarch suspended public work and summoned only eight trusted councellors. In a letter from May 3, 1429 Prince Witold reprimanded the Polish king for excessively yielding to the Szafraniec brothers – the Cracow Chamberlain – Piotr and the Chancellor of the Crown Jan. W. Uruszczak, Państwo pierwszych Jagiellonów 1386–1444, Warszawa 1999, p. 48. 2 In spite of this being such a small group, it must be noted that it was not internally coherent and homogenous.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Southampton Research Repository
    University of Southampton Research Repository Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis and, where applicable, any accompanying data are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non- commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis and the accompanying data cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content of the thesis and accompanying research data (where applicable) must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holder/s. When referring to this thesis and any accompanying data, full bibliographic details must be given, e.g. Thesis: Katarzyna Kosior (2017) "Becoming and Queen in Early Modern Europe: East and West", University of Southampton, Faculty of the Humanities, History Department, PhD Thesis, 257 pages. University of Southampton FACULTY OF HUMANITIES Becoming a Queen in Early Modern Europe East and West KATARZYNA KOSIOR Doctor of Philosophy in History 2017 ~ 2 ~ UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON ABSTRACT FACULTY OF HUMANITIES History Doctor of Philosophy BECOMING A QUEEN IN EARLY MODERN EUROPE: EAST AND WEST Katarzyna Kosior My thesis approaches sixteenth-century European queenship through an analysis of the ceremonies and rituals accompanying the marriages of Polish and French queens consort: betrothal, wedding, coronation and childbirth. The thesis explores the importance of these events for queens as both a personal and public experience, and questions the existence of distinctly Western and Eastern styles of queenship. A comparative study of ‘Eastern’ and ‘Western’ ceremony in the sixteenth century has never been attempted before and sixteenth- century Polish queens usually do not appear in any collective works about queenship, even those which claim to have a pan-European focus.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Structure of Road Transportation and Logistics Infrastructure in the Republic of Belarus
    ISSN 1426-5915 e-ISSN 2543-859X 20(2)/2017 Prace Komisji Geografii Komunikacji PTG 2017, 20(2), 8-18 DOI 10.4467/2543859XPKG.17.007.7389 GeoGraPhic sTrucTure of road TransPorTaTion and loGisTics infrasTrucTure in The rePublic of belarus Struktura geograficzna infrastruktury transportu drogowego i logistyki w Republice Białorusi andrei bezruchonak Department of Economic Geography of Foreign Countries, Faculty of Geography, Belarusian State University, Leningradskaya st. 16, 220030, Minsk, Belarus e-mail: [email protected] citation: Bezruchonak A., 2017, Geographic structure of road transportation and logistics infrastructure in the Republic of Belarus, Prace Komisji Geografii Komunikacji PTG, 20(2), 8-18. abstract: Transportation, representing 6% of GDP, plays vital role in social and economic development of the Republic of Belarus. The purpose of this article is to present the geographic analysis of current spatial structure of the road transportation in Belarus in 2000-2014. The choice of transport mode for the article was influenced by several factors, such as historic devel- opment, network coverage, transformational changes in productivity, rapid increase in car ownership numbers, emergence of logistic centers and intelligent transportation systems. The article reviews the range of topics, including morphology of the major roads network, logistic centers spatial distribution and regional features of passenger and cargo productivity, discusses current transformational changes within the road transportation sector in Belarus. The key findings indicate that current changes in spatial structure of the road transportation in Belarus have uneven nature, shaped by social, economic, political and geopolitical external and internal factors and are a subject of interest for both transportation researchers and practitioners.
    [Show full text]
  • Polish Battles and Campaigns in 13Th–19Th Centuries
    POLISH BATTLES AND CAMPAIGNS IN 13TH–19TH CENTURIES WOJSKOWE CENTRUM EDUKACJI OBYWATELSKIEJ IM. PŁK. DYPL. MARIANA PORWITA 2016 POLISH BATTLES AND CAMPAIGNS IN 13TH–19TH CENTURIES WOJSKOWE CENTRUM EDUKACJI OBYWATELSKIEJ IM. PŁK. DYPL. MARIANA PORWITA 2016 Scientific editors: Ph. D. Grzegorz Jasiński, Prof. Wojciech Włodarkiewicz Reviewers: Ph. D. hab. Marek Dutkiewicz, Ph. D. hab. Halina Łach Scientific Council: Prof. Piotr Matusak – chairman Prof. Tadeusz Panecki – vice-chairman Prof. Adam Dobroński Ph. D. Janusz Gmitruk Prof. Danuta Kisielewicz Prof. Antoni Komorowski Col. Prof. Dariusz S. Kozerawski Prof. Mirosław Nagielski Prof. Zbigniew Pilarczyk Ph. D. hab. Dariusz Radziwiłłowicz Prof. Waldemar Rezmer Ph. D. hab. Aleksandra Skrabacz Prof. Wojciech Włodarkiewicz Prof. Lech Wyszczelski Sketch maps: Jan Rutkowski Design and layout: Janusz Świnarski Front cover: Battle against Theutonic Knights, XVI century drawing from Marcin Bielski’s Kronika Polski Translation: Summalinguæ © Copyright by Wojskowe Centrum Edukacji Obywatelskiej im. płk. dypl. Mariana Porwita, 2016 © Copyright by Stowarzyszenie Historyków Wojskowości, 2016 ISBN 978-83-65409-12-6 Publisher: Wojskowe Centrum Edukacji Obywatelskiej im. płk. dypl. Mariana Porwita Stowarzyszenie Historyków Wojskowości Contents 7 Introduction Karol Olejnik 9 The Mongol Invasion of Poland in 1241 and the battle of Legnica Karol Olejnik 17 ‘The Great War’ of 1409–1410 and the Battle of Grunwald Zbigniew Grabowski 29 The Battle of Ukmergė, the 1st of September 1435 Marek Plewczyński 41 The
    [Show full text]
  • Chairman of the NATO Military Committee Visited Lithuania
    SEPTEMBER 2020. NO 9 (28). NEWS NATO MILITARY COMMITTEE DISTANCE MEETING MULTINATIONAL AIR DEFENCE EXERCISE NATO'S PRESENCE LITHUANIA — THROUGH THE EYES OF A FRIEND Chairman of the NATO Military Committee visited Lithuania n September 25 Chairman of the tee to NATO’s political decision-making Military Committee (MC) Air structures. He directs and publicly represents Chief Marshal Sir Stuart William work of the NATO Military Committee. OPeach (United Kingdom — Air Force) con- Air Chief Marshal Sir Stuart William Peach SPECIAL duced an official visit to Lithuania. (United Kingdom — Air Force) assumed the FELIKSAS VAITKUS — He met with Speaker of the Lithuanian position on 18 June 2018. THE HERO OF A Parliament Viktoras Pranckietis, Chief of De- Air Chief Marshal Sir Stuart Peach (Uni- fence Lt Gen Valdemaras Rupšys, other rep- ted Kingdom — Air Force) is the 32nd Chair- TRANSATLANTIC FLIGHT resentatives of the Lithuanian Armed Forces. man of the Military Committee of the North The guest also visited the NATO Energy Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO); the Security Centre of Excellence in Vilnius and most senior and longest standing military received briefings on the regional security structure in the Alliance. situation from the Lithuanian Armed Forces Air Chief Marshal Peach is NATO’s most Defence Staff. senior military officer and is the Military -Ad Chairman of the NATO Military Com- viser to the Secretary General and the North mittee is chief military advisor to the NATO Atlantic Council. In addition, he is the Uni- Secretary General
    [Show full text]
  • The “Belarus Factor” from Balancing to Bridging Geopolitical Dividing Lines in Europe?
    The “Belarus factor” From balancing to bridging geopolitical dividing lines in Europe? Clingendael Report Tony van der Togt The “Belarus factor” From balancing to bridging geopolitical dividing lines in Europe? Tony van der Togt Clingendael Report January 2017 January 2017 © Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’. Cover photo: The leaders of Belarus, Russia, Germany, France and Ukraine after signing the Minsk II agreement, February 2015. © In Terris Online Newspaper Unauthorized use of any materials violates copyright, trademark and / or other laws. Should a user download material from the website or any other source related to the Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’, or the Clingendael Institute, for personal or non-commercial use, the user must retain all copyright, trademark or other similar notices contained in the original material or on any copies of this material. Material on the website of the Clingendael Institute may be reproduced or publicly displayed, distributed or used for any public and non-commercial purposes, but only by mentioning the Clingendael Institute as its source. Permission is required to use the logo of the Clingendael Institute. This can be obtained by contacting the Communication desk of the Clingendael Institute ([email protected]). The following web link activities are prohibited by the Clingendael Institute and may present trademark and copyright infringement issues: links that involve unauthorized use of our logo, framing, inline links, or metatags, as well as hyperlinks or a form of link disguising the URL. About the author Tony van der Togt is Senior Research Fellow at the Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’ in The Hague.
    [Show full text]
  • SITUATION of HUMAN RIGHTS in BELARUS in 2014
    Human Rights Centre “Viasna” SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS in BELARUS in 2014 REVIEW-CHRONICLE Minsk, 2015 SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN BELARUS in 2014 REVIEW-CHRONICLE Author and compiler: Tatsiana Reviaka Editor and author of the foreword: Valiantsin Stefanovich The edition was prepared on the basis of reviews of human rights violations in Belarus published every month in 2014. Each of the monthly reviews includes an analysis of the most important events infl uencing the observance of human rights and outlines the most eloquent and characteristic facts of human rights abuses registered over the described period. The review was prepared on the basis of personal appeals of victims of human rights abuses and the facts which were either registered by human rights activists or reported by open informational sources. The book features photos from the archive of the Human Rights Center “Viasna”, as well as from publications on the websites of Radio Free Europe/ Radio Liberty Belarus service, the Nasha Niva newspaper, tv.lrytas.lt, baj.by, gazetaby.com, and taken by Franak Viachorka and Siarhei Hudzilin. Human Rights Situation in 2014: Trends and Evaluation The situation of human rights during 2014 remained consistently poor with a tendency to deterioration at the end of the year. Human rights violations were of both systemic and systematic nature: basic civil and political rights were extremely restricted, there were no systemic changes in the fi eld of human rights (at the legislative level and (or) at the level of practices). The only positive development during the year was the early release of Ales Bialiatski, Chairman of the Human Rights Centre “Viasna” and Vice-President of the International Federation for Human Rights.
    [Show full text]
  • The Triumphant Genealogical Awareness of the Nobility In
    LITHUANIAN HISTORICAL STUDIES 22 2018 ISSN 1392-2343 PP. 29–49 THE TRIUMPHANT GENEALOGICAL AWARENESS OF THE NOBILITY IN THE GRAND DUCHY OF LITHUANIA IN THE 17TH AND 18TH CENTURIES Agnė Railaitė-Bardė (Lithuanian Institute of History) ABSTRACT This article attempts to show how the manifestation of ancestors was expressed in the genealogical awareness of the nobility in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, using publications to mark special occasions in the 17th and 18th centuries, genealogical trees and diagrams. The research seeks to establish what effect the exaltation of various battles had on the genealogical memory of the nobility in the Grand Duchy, bearing in mind the context of its involvement in one of the most famous battles it ever fought. The genealogical sources mentioned were examined in order to ascertain which battles and what memories of the commanders who fought in them were important to the genealogical awareness of the nobility, and why this memory was selective, for some battles and notable heroes from these battles are remembered and glorified, while others are simply forgotten. Memories of which battles were important to the genealogical presentation of certain families, how was it expressed, and in what period were the ancestors who participated in these battles remembered? The first part of the study presents the memory of ancestors as soldiers, and the ways this memory was expressed. The second part focuses on an- cestors who distinguished themselves in specific battles, and which family members who participated in battles are remembered and honoured, in this way distinguishing them from other ancestors. KEYWORDS: Grand Duchy of Lithuania; nobility; genealogical awareness; militaristic; heraldry.
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Chicago Smuggler States: Poland, Latvia, Estonia, and Contraband Trade Across the Soviet Frontier, 1919-1924
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO SMUGGLER STATES: POLAND, LATVIA, ESTONIA, AND CONTRABAND TRADE ACROSS THE SOVIET FRONTIER, 1919-1924 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BY ANDREY ALEXANDER SHLYAKHTER CHICAGO, ILLINOIS DECEMBER 2020 Илюше Abstract Smuggler States: Poland, Latvia, Estonia, and Contraband Trade Across the Soviet Frontier, 1919-1924 What happens to an imperial economy after empire? How do economics, security, power, and ideology interact at the new state frontiers? Does trade always break down ideological barriers? The eastern borders of Poland, Latvia, and Estonia comprised much of the interwar Soviet state’s western frontier – the focus of Moscow’s revolutionary aspirations and security concerns. These young nations paid for their independence with the loss of the Imperial Russian market. Łódź, the “Polish Manchester,” had fashioned its textiles for Russian and Ukrainian consumers; Riga had been the Empire’s busiest commercial port; Tallinn had been one of the busiest – and Russians drank nine-tenths of the potato vodka distilled on Estonian estates. Eager to reclaim their traditional market, but stymied by the Soviet state monopoly on foreign trade and impatient with the slow grind of trade talks, these countries’ businessmen turned to the porous Soviet frontier. The dissertation reveals how, despite considerable misgivings, their governments actively abetted this traffic. The Polish and Baltic struggles to balance the heady profits of the “border trade” against a host of security concerns shaped everyday lives and government decisions on both sides of the Soviet frontier.
    [Show full text]
  • Edict of the President of the Republic of Belarus No 458 of August 4, 1999 [Amended As of October 22, 2012] on Creation of Free
    Edict of the President of the Republic of Belarus No 458 of August 4, 1999 [Amended as of October 22, 2012] On Creation of Free Economic Zone “Vitebsk” With the aim to attract national and foreign investments for organization and development of production facilities based on new and high technologies, to ensure favourable conditions for economic development of the regions of the Republic, I decree: 1. To create the Free Economic Zone “Vitebsk” for the period of 30 years of the total area of 2186,1546 ha within the boundaries according to Annex. 2. To establish that: 2.1. The Free Economic Zone “Vitebsk” (hereinafter – the FEZ "Vitebsk") is a complex zone; 2.2. financing of the development of the FEZ "Vitebsk", including industrial, engineering, transport and other infrastructure along with maintenance of the Administration of the FEZ "Vitebsk" and other expenses stipulated by the legislations for ensuring functioning of the zone, is carried out at the account of the means of the republic budget and the development fund of the FEZ "Vitebsk"; 2.3. The development fund of the FEZ "Vitebsk" is formed at the account of rent payments for the land and property, which are in operative administration of the Administration of the FEZ "Vitebsk», as well as from receipts in accordance with the contracts on activity conditions of economic entities in the territory of the zone. Specific sources of forming the development fund of the FEZ "Vitebsk" and directions of spending of its means are determined by the Council of Ministers of the Republic of Belarus. 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com09/24/2021 09:22:35PM Via Free Access 54 ANTONI K
    LITHUANIAN HISTORICAL STUDIES 20 2015 ISSN 1392-2343 PP. 53–77 ON EFFORTS TO IMPROVE THE CONDITION OF THE TREASURY OF THE GRAND DUCHY OF LITHUANIA IN THE TIMES OF SIGISMUND THE OLD AND THE PERIOD OF MANAGEMENT BY JONAS JONAITIS ZABEREZINSKIS IN UŽNEMUNĖ Antoni K. Urmański ABSTRACT The article presents an analysis of the activities of the Trakai palatine and land marshal of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, Jonas Jonaitis Zaberezinskis (died 1538), as the administrator of state and private lands in Užnemunė. The author analyses this figure’s relations with the efforts initiated by Grand Duke of Lithuania Sigismund the Old and his wife Bona Sforza to improve the state’s finances. Based on the work already done by previous authors and source data, the author tries to reconstruct the magnate groups that existed in the 1520s and 1530s, and also to analyse Zaberezinskis’ economic administration in the region where most data has survived regarding his activities, i.e. in Užnemunė, in the period from 1506 when Alytus and Simnas came under the jurisdiction of the Zaberezinskis family following the privilege of Alexander Jagiellon, until the death of Jonas Jonaitis Zaberezinskis in 1538. Domestic and foreign policy of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania (GDL) in the times of Sigismund the Old has on numerous occasions been analysed in historical scientific literature, yet we still come across data that can broaden our knowledge of this topic even further. Polish chancellor Jan Chojeński gave a good description of the domestic situation in Lithuania in the beginning of the 1530s in his letter dated 30 July 1533 to the Polish deputy-chancellor, Piotr Tomicki.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline1800 18001600
    TIMELINE1800 18001600 Date York Date Britain Date Rest of World 8000BCE Sharpened stone heads used as axes, spears and arrows. 7000BCE Walls in Jericho built. 6100BCE North Atlantic Ocean – Tsunami. 6000BCE Dry farming developed in Mesopotamian hills. - 4000BCE Tigris-Euphrates planes colonized. - 3000BCE Farming communities spread from south-east to northwest Europe. 5000BCE 4000BCE 3900BCE 3800BCE 3760BCE Dynastic conflicts in Upper and Lower Egypt. The first metal tools commonly used in agriculture (rakes, digging blades and ploughs) used as weapons by slaves and peasant ‘infantry’ – first mass usage of expendable foot soldiers. 3700BCE 3600BCE © PastSearch2012 - T i m e l i n e Page 1 Date York Date Britain Date Rest of World 3500BCE King Menes the Fighter is victorious in Nile conflicts, establishes ruling dynasties. Blast furnace used for smelting bronze used in Bohemia. Sumerian civilization developed in south-east of Tigris-Euphrates river area, Akkadian civilization developed in north-west area – continual warfare. 3400BCE 3300BCE 3200BCE 3100BCE 3000BCE Bronze Age begins in Greece and China. Egyptian military civilization developed. Composite re-curved bows being used. In Mesopotamia, helmets made of copper-arsenic bronze with padded linings. Gilgamesh, king of Uruk, first to use iron for weapons. Sage Kings in China refine use of bamboo weaponry. 2900BCE 2800BCE Sumer city-states unite for first time. 2700BCE Palestine invaded and occupied by Egyptian infantry and cavalry after Palestinian attacks on trade caravans in Sinai. 2600BCE 2500BCE Harrapan civilization developed in Indian valley. Copper, used for mace heads, found in Mesopotamia, Syria, Palestine and Egypt. Sumerians make helmets, spearheads and axe blades from bronze.
    [Show full text]