Sperm Storage in the Class Amphibia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sperm Storage in the Class Amphibia © PENSOFT Publishers A. Legakis, S. Sfenthourakis, R. Polymeni & M. Thessaloii-Legaki (eds.) The New Panorama of Animal Evolution Sofia - Moscow Proc. IS"' hit. Coiigr. Zoo/ogi/, pp. 431-438, 2003 Sperm Storage in the Class Amphibia D.M. Sever', L.C. Rania' & R. Brizzi^ 1. Department of Biology, Saint Mary's College, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556 USA 2. Department of Animal Biology and Genetics, University of Florence, Florence, Italy Abstract The three orders of extant amphibians are Caudata, Anura, and Apoda. In salamanders and newts (Caudata), absence of sperm storage in females is the ancestral condition (three families). In the derived condition, sperm storage occurs in cloacal glands called sper• mathecae, and their possession is a synapomorphy for females in the suborder Salaman- droidea (seven families). The anatomy and phylogeny of caudate spermathecae have been studied extensively (reviewed by Sever & Brizzi 1998). Internal fertilization has conver- gently evolved in a few frogs and toads (Anura), but females of just one species, Ascaphus truei Axe. known to possess oviducal sperm storage tubules (Ssts). Ssts of A. truei Are similar anatomically to such glands in squamate reptiles. This similarity is convergence perhaps due to design constraints imposed by the basic structure of the vertebrate oviduct. Al• though all caecilians (Apoda) apparently have internal fertilization and many are vivipa• rous, female sperm storage is unknown. Introduction The Lissamphibia (extant amphibians) consists of three orders, Caudata or Urodela (salamanders and newts, 500 species), Anura (frogs and toads, 4800 species), and Apoda or Gymnophiona (caecilians, 165 species). Sperm storage by females occurs in most species of salamanders, one species of frog, and is unknown in the caecilians. The anatomy of sperm storage glands has been extensively studied in salamanders and was recently reviewed by Sever & Brizzi (1998). Ascaphus /A//CV (Stejneger, 1899) is the only frog in which female sperm storage is known, and this phenomenon has been studied by Noble (1925), Van Dijk (1955,1959), Metter (1964), and Sever etal. (2001). Caudata Sperm storage occurs in all females found in the seven families of salamanders that comprise the suborder Salamandroidea (Sever 1991a, 1994). Instead of oviductal sperm storage, however, sperm are stored in cloacal glands called spermathecae. Possession of 432 The new panorama of animal evolution a cloaca is considered the ancestral condition for vertebrates (Wake 1979, 1987), but salamanders are the only vertebrates in which cloacal sperm storage glands have evolved (Sever 1994). The ancestral condition for salamanders is lack of sperm storage glands, a condition found in three families with external fertilization, Sirenidae, Hynobiidae, and Cryptobranchidae (Sever 1991b, 1994, Sever etal. 1996b). Sever & Brizzi (1998) mapped 14 characters involved with sperm storage in spermathecae on a phylogeny of salamander families taken from Larson & Dimmick (1993). The only character with definite phyletic value is whether sperm storage occurs in a "complex spermatheca" composed of a single compound tubulo-alveolar gland (Plethodontidae) or in "simple spermathecae" consisting of numerous simple tubular glands (other families). The variation in complex spermathecae of plethodontids was described by Sever (2000). The annual cycle of sperm storage has been studied at the ultrastructural level in two Plethodontidae (Sever 1997, Sever & Brunette 1993), three Salamandridae (Brizzi et al. 1995, Sever etal 1996a, 1999,2001), two Ambystomahdae (Sever 1995, Sever & Kloepfer 1993, Sever et al. 1995), one Amphiumidae (Sever et al. 1996c), and one Proteidae (Sever & Bart 1996). Studies still need to be done on representatives of the Rhyacotritonidae and Dicamptodontidae. Thus, female sperm storage has been studied in only 2% of the known species of salamanders, and much diversity exists among the few species that have been studied in reproductive habits and sperm storage characters (Sever & Brizzi 1998). More comparative work is needed before we resolve any of the questions concerning the significance of variability in sperm storage mechanisms among salamanders. Sever & Brizzi (1998) concluded that: (1) sperm storage is an ancient trait in salamanders, evolving in the common ancestor of all the current families in the Salamandroidea; (2) some of the differences observed among taxa in spermathecal characters may not be phyletically informative but related to other species-specific reproductive adaptations; (3) sperm storage is apparently obligatory prior to fertilization in salamandroids so that the dura tion of effective sperm s torage must be considered in any study on the reproduction of these taxa; and (4) storage of sperm facilitates multiple matings and provides the conditions for sperm competition within the spermathecae of salamanders. Anura The presence of sperm in the lumen of the oviducts and in oviducal glands of females of the frog Ascaphus tnielwdLS first reported by Noble (1925). Ascaphus truei \s the sole member of the family Ascaphidae and is generally considered the sister taxon of all other anurans (Ford & Camiatella 1993). Ascaphus truei is associated with cold, clear mountain streams in disjunct populations in the Cascade Moimtains west to the coast from southern British Columbia to northwest California; in the Blue Mountains of southwestern Washington and northeastern Oregon; and in the Rocky Mountains of northern Idaho and western Montana (Metter 1968)'. Of the 4000+ species of anurans, A. trueivs, the only ' The Rocky Mountain populations of Ascaphus have recently been recognized as a new species, A. montanus (Nielson et al. 2001). Sperm Storage in the Class Amphibia 433 species known to engage in copulation. The male possesses a "tail" that, when engorged, forms a sulcus for passage of sperm and is inserted in the cloaca of the female (Noble 1925, Noble & Puhiam 1931, Slater 1931). Copulation has been assumed to be an adaptation that ensures fertilization in fast-moving water (Stebbins & Cohen 1995). Posterior to a short, aglandular infundibular region, the oviduct of ^. /n/t'/possesses: (1) a proximal, convoluted ampullary region where intrinsic tubular glands secrete gelatinous envelopes around eggs; (2) a middle ovisac region where fertilization occurs; and (3) a distal oviductal sinus formed by medial junction of the ovisacs. An oviductal sinus has previously been described in Frogs only for the viviparous African bufonid Nimbaphri/noides occidentalis (Xavier 1973). Sperm storage tubules (Ssts) occur in the anterior portions of the ovisacs and consist of simple tubular glands. Ssts and the rest of the oviductal lining stain positively with the periodic acid-Schiff's procedure for neutral carbohydrates, and this reaction is especially intense in reproductively active females. Sperm were found in the Ssts of gravid females as well as some non-vitellogenic females. The sperm are in orderly bundles in the Ssts, and although occasionally sperm nuclei were embedded in the epithelium, no evidence for spermiophagy was found. Apoda Apparently all caecilians have internal fertilization. The male possesses a cloacal structure called the phallodeum that is everted from the cloaca and serves for intromission of sperm into the female cloaca during copulation (Wake 1979). Many caecilians are viviparous, a derived condition within the Apoda (Wilkinson & Nussbaum 1998). We hypothesize that sperm storage occurs in the oviducts of female caecilians, but no observations on sperm in the oviduct of a female caecilian have yet been made. Comparative biology To date, Ascaphus truei is the only amphibian in which oviductal sperm storage has been reported. Indeed, the only other anamniotes in which oviductal sperm storage is known are elasmobranchs (Pratt 1993, Hamlett etal. 1998, Hamlett & Koob 1999, Hamlett etal. 1999) in the class Chondrichthyes, which is not considered the sister taxon of Amphibia. Females of some teleosts in the Osteichthyes store sperm (Howarth 1974), but they lack homologues to the oviduct (Kardong 1995). Instead sperm are stored in the ovary or a gonaduct (ovarian duct) formed from ovarian tissue (Howarth 1974, Constanz 1989). The extant representatives of Actinistia and Dipnoi, descendant taxa of sarcopterygiian sister groups of amphibians (Schultze 1994), possess oviducts (Millot & Anthony 1960, Wake 1987), and Latimeriais viviparous (Smith etal. 1975) indicating that fertiHzation is internal (Fig. 1). Sperm storage, however, has not been reported in Latimeria or any of the extant lungfish. Thus, no neontological evidence exists for sperm storage as the ancestral state for amphibians. The Lissamphibia is generally considered monophyletic. Most evidence supports a frog + salamander clade (Pough etal. 1998, Fig. 1). As noted previously, sperm storage is unknown in female caecilians, even though internal fertilization apparently occurs in all taxa (Fig. 1), and many caecilians are viviparous (Wilkinson & Nussbaum 1998). In 434 The new panorama of animal evolution Fig. 1. "Scenariogram" showing distribution of internal fertilization and sperm storage in the Lissamphibia with extant sacropterygiians (descendent taxa of piscine ancestors to amphibians) as outgroups. Within the amphibians, sperm storage glands evolved independently in the cloaca in one suborder of salamanders (Salamandroidea) and in the oviduct of one species of frog {Ascaphus truei). From Sever et al. (2001). salamanders, cloacal sperm storage
Recommended publications
  • Vernacular Name AMPHIUMA, ONE-TOED (Aka: Congo Eel, Congo Snake, Ditch Eel, Fish Eel and Lamprey Eel)
    1/6 Vernacular Name AMPHIUMA, ONE-TOED (aka: Congo Eel, Congo Snake, Ditch Eel, Fish Eel and Lamprey Eel) GEOGRAPHIC RANGE Eastern Gulf coast. HABITAT Wetlands: slow moving or stagnant freshwater rivers/streams/creeks and bogs, marshes, swamps, fens and peat lands. CONSERVATION STATUS IUCN: Near Threatened (2016). Population Trend: Decreasing. Because of the limited extent of its occurrence and because of the declining extent and quality of its habitat, this species is close to qualifying for Vulnerable. COOL FACTS Amphiumas are commonly known as "Congo eels," a misnomer. First of all, amphiumas are amphibians, rather than fish (which eels are). This notwithstanding, amphiumas bear resemblance to the elongate fishes. It is easy to overlook the diminutive legs, and the lack of any external gills adds to the similarity between the amphiumas and eels. Amphiumas are adapted for digging and tunneling. They seem to spend most of the time in muddy burrows and are rarely observed in the wild. They never fully metamorphose and retain larval characteristics in varying degrees into adulthood: one pair of the larval gill slits is retained and never disappears, no eyelids, no tongue and the presence of 4 gill arches with a single respiratory opening between the 3 rd--4th arches. Amphiumas have two pairs of limbs, and the three species, all of which occur in the S.E. U.S, differ in regard to the number of toes at the ends of these limbs: one, two or three. These amphiumas possess tiny, single-toed limbs, one pair just behind the small gill opening at each side of the neck and another pair just ahead of the longitudinal anal slit .
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Feeding in Salamanders
    CHAPTER 3 Aquatic Feeding in Salamanders STEPHEN M. DEBAN AND DAVID B. WAKE Museum of Vertebrate Zoology and Department oflntegrative Biology University of California Berkeley, California 94720 I. INTRODUCTION canum. Some undergo partial metamorphosis and pos- A. Systematics sess both adult and larval features when reproductive, B. Natural History such as the fully aquatic Cryptobranchus. Others are C. Feeding Modes and Terminology primarily terrestrial and become secondarily aquatic 11. MORPHOLOGY as metamorphosed adults, notably during the breed- A. Larval Morphology ing season. The family Salamandridae contains the B. Adult Morphology most representatives of this type, known commonly C. Sensory and Motor Systems as newts. 111. FUNCTION A. Ingestion Behavior and Kinematics Salamanders covered in this chapter may be terres- B. Prey Processing trial, semiaquatic, or fully aquatic. They may return to C. Functional Morphology the water only periodically and may feed on both land D. Biomechanics and in water. Discussion here focuses on the aquatic E. Metamorphosis feeding biology of these taxa. Terrestrial feeding of F. Performance semiaquatic and terrestrial salamanders is discussed G. Variation in the next chapter. Here we describe the various feed- IV. DIVERSITY AND EVOLUTION ing behaviors: foraging, ingestion (prey capture), prey A. Features of Salamander Families processing, intraoral prey transport, and swallowing. B. Phylogenetic Patterns of Feeding Form and Function We review the relevant morphology and function of V. OPPORTUNITIES FOR FUTURE RESEARCH the sensory and motor systems and analyze the bio- References mechanical function of the feeding apparatus. Finally, we consider the evolution of aquatic feeding systems within and among the major taxa of salamanders.
    [Show full text]
  • I Online Supplementary Data – Sexual Size Dimorphism in Salamanders
    Online Supplementary data – Sexual size dimorphism in salamanders Supplementary data S1. Species data used in this study and references list. Males Females SSD Significant test Ref Species n SVL±SD n SVL±SD Andrias davidianus 2 532.5 8 383.0 -0.280 12 Cryptobranchus alleganiensis 53 277.4±5.2 52 300.9±3.4 0.084 Yes 61 Batrachuperus karlschmidti 10 80.0 10 84.8 0.060 26 Batrachuperus londongensis 20 98.6 10 96.7 -0.019 12 Batrachuperus pinchonii 5 69.6 5 74.6 0.070 26 Batrachuperus taibaiensis 11 92.9±12.1 9 102.1±7.1 0.099 Yes 27 Batrachuperus tibetanus 10 94.5 10 92.8 -0.017 12 Batrachuperus yenyuadensis 10 82.8 10 74.8 -0.096 26 Hynobius abei 24 57.8±2.1 34 55.0±1.2 -0.048 Yes 92 Hynobius amakusaensis 22 75.4±4.8 12 76.5±3.6 0.014 No 93 Hynobius arisanensis 72 54.3±4.8 40 55.2±4.8 0.016 No 94 Hynobius boulengeri 37 83.0±5.4 15 91.5±3.8 0.102 Yes 95 Hynobius formosanus 15 53.0±4.4 8 52.4±3.9 -0.011 No 94 Hynobius fuca 4 50.9±2.8 3 52.8±2.0 0.037 No 94 Hynobius glacialis 12 63.1±4.7 11 58.9±5.2 -0.066 No 94 Hynobius hidamontanus 39 47.7±1.0 15 51.3±1.2 0.075 Yes 96 Hynobius katoi 12 58.4±3.3 10 62.7±1.6 0.073 Yes 97 Hynobius kimurae 20 63.0±1.5 15 72.7±2.0 0.153 Yes 98 Hynobius leechii 70 61.6±4.5 18 66.5±5.9 0.079 Yes 99 Hynobius lichenatus 37 58.5±1.9 2 53.8 -0.080 100 Hynobius maoershanensis 4 86.1 2 80.1 -0.069 101 Hynobius naevius 72.1 76.7 0.063 102 Hynobius nebulosus 14 48.3±2.9 12 50.4±2.1 0.043 Yes 96 Hynobius osumiensis 9 68.4±3.1 15 70.2±3.0 0.026 No 103 Hynobius quelpaertensis 41 52.5±3.8 4 61.3±4.1 0.167 Yes 104 Hynobius
    [Show full text]
  • (Amphibia, Urodela) from the Late Jurassic of Qinglong, Hebei Province, China
    RESEARCH ARTICLE A New Basal Salamandroid (Amphibia, Urodela) from the Late Jurassic of Qinglong, Hebei Province, China Jia Jia, Ke-Qin Gao* School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, 5 Yiheyuan Road, Beijing, 100871, China * [email protected] a11111 Abstract A new salamandroid salamander, Qinglongtriton gangouensis (gen. et sp. nov.), is named and described based on 46 fossil specimens of juveniles and adults collected from the Upper Jurassic (Oxfordian) Tiaojishan Formation cropping out in Hebei Province, China. OPEN ACCESS The new salamander displays several ontogenetically and taxonomically significant fea- Citation: Jia J, Gao K-Q (2016) A New Basal tures, most prominently the presence of a toothed palatine, toothed coronoid, and a unique Salamandroid (Amphibia, Urodela) from the Late pattern of the hyobranchium in adults. Comparative study of the new salamander with previ- Jurassic of Qinglong, Hebei Province, China. PLoS ONE 11(5): e0153834. doi:10.1371/journal. ously known fossil and extant salamandroids sheds new light on the early evolution of the pone.0153834 Salamandroidea, the most species-diverse clade in the Urodela. Cladistic analysis places Editor: William Oki Wong, Institute of Botany, CHINA the new salamander as the sister taxon to Beiyanerpeton, and the two taxa together form the basalmost clade within the Salamandroidea. Along with recently reported Beiyanerpe- Received: December 11, 2015 ton from the same geological formation in the neighboring Liaoning Province, the discovery Accepted: April 2, 2016 of Qinglongtriton indicates that morphological disparity had been underway for the sala- Published: May 4, 2016 mandroid clade by early Late Jurassic (Oxfordian) time. Copyright: © 2016 Jia, Gao.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Biology of Sperm Storage in Female Salamanders
    THE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ZOOLOGY 282:460-476 (1998) Comparative Biology of Sperm Storage in Female Salamanders DAVID M. SEVERN* AND ROSSANA BRIZZI' 'Department of Biology, Saint Mary's College, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556 ^Dipartimento di Biologia Animale e Genetica, Universita di Firenze, 50125 Firenze, Italia ABSTRACT Females in seven of the ten families of salamanders possess cloacal glands called spermathecae that store sperm. The annual cycle of sperm storage has been studied by light and electron microscopy in eight species representing five families. In these taxa, we recognized 14 characters associated with the spermathecae and traced their evolution on a phylogeny of sala• manders based upon other characters. The plasticity and phyletic significance of the spermathecal characters varied greatly. Plethodontids have complex spermathecae while other families possess simple spermathecae; thus, this character has phyletic value as well as being highly conserved within the Salamandroidea. Other characters, such as carbohydrate histochemistry, are highly plastic and show no obvious phyletic trends. The significance of some of these variable characters, such as duration of sperm storage, is apparent only after including in the analysis other aspects of the reproductive cycle, such as length of the mating season. Additional comparative studies, em• ploying the protocol used in this paper, will help further clarify the relationships between phyletic and functional variability in sperm storage mechanisms in salamanders. J. Exp. Zool. 282:460-
    [Show full text]
  • Salamanders of the Mio-Pliocene Gray Fossil Site, Washington County, Tennessee
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 5-2009 Salamanders of the Mio-Pliocene Gray Fossil Site, Washington County, Tennessee. Grant Stanley Boardman East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Paleontology Commons Recommended Citation Boardman, Grant Stanley, "Salamanders of the Mio-Pliocene Gray Fossil Site, Washington County, Tennessee." (2009). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1790. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1790 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Salamanders of the Mio-Pliocene Gray Fossil Site, Washington County, Tennessee _____________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of Biological Sciences East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Biological Sciences _____________________ by Grant Stanley Boardman May 2009 _____________________ Blaine W. Schubert, Chair Steven C. Wallace Thomas F. Laughlin Jim I. Mead Keywords: Mio-Pliocene, Caudata, Appalachian, Salamander ABSTRACT Salamanders of the Mio-Pliocene Gray Fossil Site, Washington County, Tennessee by Grant Stanley Boardman Screening efforts at the Gray Fossil Site, Washington County, Tennessee, have yielded a unique and diverse salamander fauna for the southern Appalachian Mio-Pliocene; including at least five taxa from three modern families (Ambystomatidae, Plethodontidae, and Salamandridae) supporting the woodland-pond interpretation of the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Vieites2009chap50.Pdf
    Salamanders (Caudata) David R. Vieites*, Peng Zhang, and David B. Wake with diB erent data sets, while the positions of others, Museum of Vertebrate Zoology and Department of Integrative in particular the sirenids and proteids, have remained Biology, 3101 Valley Life Sciences Building, University of California, contentious. Berkeley, 94720-3160, California, USA A monophyletic Cryptobranchoidea and a clade con- *To whom correspondence should be addressed sisting of Dicamptodontidae and Ambystomatidae are ([email protected]) recovered in every molecular phylogenetic study (Vieites and Wake, submitted; Zhang and Wake, submitted; 2, Abstract 5–10). Salamandridae is usually recovered as the closest relative of the clade constituted by dicamptodontids and Living salamanders (~570 species) are placed in 10 families, ambystomatids (Vieites and Wake, submitted; Zhang comprising the Order Caudata. Their classifi cation is rela- and Wake, submitted; 2, 5–7, 9, 10). Frost et al. (9) pro- tively stable, but phylogenetic relationships among families posed placing Dicamptodontidae in Ambystomatidae are contentious. Recent molecular phylogenetic analyses because the two families form a clade and each con- have found fi ve major clades. The salamander timetree tains only a single living genus, but divergence between shows the deepest divergence, between Cryptobranchoidea the lineages is great and the two are very old (115.8 Ma, and all other familes, in the Triassic (251–200 million years Table 1). Furthermore, dicamptodontids have a long and ago, Ma) with subsequent diversifi cation occurring in the rather rich fossil record so the recognition of only a sin- Jurassic (200–146 Ma) and early Cretaceous (146–100 Ma). gle family is misleading.
    [Show full text]
  • Ampmbia: CAUDATA AMPHIUMIDAE Ampmuma ~ A.Mphiuma Garden
    147.1 AMPHIUMIDAE AMPmBIA: CAUDATA AMPmUMA Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles. COMMENT SALTHE, STANLEYN. 1973. Amphiumidae, Ampmuma. The family name Amphiumidae was first used in 1825 by Gray for a taxon including both Ampmuma and Crypto• branchus. It was not until 1850 (again by Gray) that this Amphiumidae Gray name was used for a taxon including only amphiumids, that Congo eels is, for the taxon as it is now constituted. Therefore, use of Amphiumidae Gray 1825, for example by Kuhn (1962), is Amphiumidae Gray, 1850:54. Type genus Ampmuma Garden incorrect. Tschudi (1838) noted the relationship between 1773, published by Smith, 1821. Andrias and Cryptobranchus and also that the living repre• Muraenopses Fitzinger, 1843:34. See comment. sentative of the former does not have open gill slits. He Amphiumidae Cope, 1875:25. Cope regarded himself as the therefore broke apart the old family Amphiumidae and author of this family, disregarding Gray. gathered the cryptobranchids into a family Tritonides. Ap• Amphiumidae Gray, 1825; Kuhn, 1962:361. See comment. parently being unwilling to erect a monotypic family (there are none in his work of that year), he erected a new family • CONTENT: One fossil genus, Proamphiuma, and one genus, Proteidae, based largely on shared larval characters, to include Amphiuma, both recent and fossil. Amphiuma along with the axolotl, Proteus, Necturus, and the sirenids. It was Fitzinger (1843) who first placed the am• • DEFlNITION. The premaxillaries are coossified, premaxil• phiumids in a family of their own, the Muraenopses, for lary spines being produced posteriorly dorsally, separating the which he supplied no definition or details of any kind (see nasals, ventrally in the roof of the mouth.
    [Show full text]
  • Os Nomes Galegos Dos Anfibios 2020 4ª Ed
    Os nomes galegos dos anfibios 2020 4ª ed. Citación recomendada / Recommended citation: A Chave (20204): Os nomes galegos dos anfibios. Xinzo de Limia (Ourense): A Chave. http://www.achave.ga!/wp"content/up!oads/achave_osnomes a!egosdos#an$i%ios#2020.pd$ Fotografía: sapo asiático común (Duttaphrynus melanostictus). Autor: Silverio Cerradelo. &sta o%ra est' su(eita a unha licenza Creative Commons de uso a%erto) con reco*ecemento da autor+a e sen o%ra derivada nin usos comerciais. ,esumo da licenza: https://creativecommons.or /!icences/%-"nc-nd/4.0/deed. !. Licenza comp!eta: https://creativecommons.or /!icences/%-"nc-nd/4.0/!e a!code.!an ua es. 1 Notas introdutorias que cont"n este documento Na primeira edición deste documento (2015) fornecéronse denominacións para as especies galegas (e) ou europeas de anfibios, e tamén para algunhas das especies exóticas máis coñecidas (estas, xeralmente, no ámbito divulgativo, por teren algunha caracter"stica #ue as fai destacar, ou por seren moi comúns noutras áreas xeográficas, ou, nalgún caso, por seren tidas como mascotas)% Na segunda e terceira edicións (201& e 2018) fóronse agregando no!os nomes galegos para anfibios ibéricos (e) ou europeos (nalgún caso, por se considerar especies diferentes na actualidade o #ue poucos anos atrás eran consideradas subespecies) e tamén para anfibios exóticos% (s" mesmo, nestas edicións engadiuse algunha referencia bibliográfica máis e corrixiuse algunha gralla% Na cuarta edición (2020), adicionáronse algunhas especies máis, asignáronse con maior precisión algunhas das denominacións !ernáculas galegas, reescrib"ronse as notas introdutorias, rema#uetouse o documento e incorporouse o logo da )ha!e.
    [Show full text]
  • Order Suborder Family Species
    Order Suborder Family Species Anura Bufonidae Bufo americanus charlesmithi Bufo fowleri Hylida Acris crepitans blanchari Hyla versicolor Pseudacris crucifer Pseudacris triseriata Microhylidae Gastrophryne carolinensis Ranidae Rana catesbeiana Rana clamitans clamitans Rana clamitans melanota Rana palustris Rana sphenocephala Rana sylvatica Caudata Salamandroidea Ambystomatidae Ambystoma annulatum Ambystoma maculatum Ambystoma opacum Ambystoma tigrinum Plethodontinae Eurycea longicauda melanopleura Eurycea lucifuga Eurycea multiplicata griseogaster Plethodon albagula Plethodon angusticlavius Typhlotriton spelaeus Caudata Salamandroidea Proteidae Necturus maculosus Salamandridae Notophthalmus viridescens Squamata Sauria Anguidae Ophisaurus attenuatus Crotaphytidae Crotaphytus collaris Phrynosomatidae Sceloporus undulatus Scincidae Eumeces anthracinus Eumeces fasciatus Eumeces laticeps Scincella lateralis Teiidae Cnemidophorus sexlineatus Table 1. Species Expected and Abundance by Taxonomy - Continued Order Suborder Family Species Serpentes Colubridae Carphophis vermis Cemophora coccinea Coluber constrictor Diadophis punctatus Elaphe guttata Elaphe obsolete Heterodon platyrhinos Lampropeltis calligaster Lampropeltis getula Lampropeltis triangulum Masticophis flagellum Nerodia erythrogaster Nerodia sipedon Opheodrys aestivus Storeria dekayi Storeria occipitomaculata Squamata Serpentes Colubridae Tantilla gracilis Thamnophis proximus Thamnophis sirtalis Virginia striatula Virginia valeriae Viperidae Agkistrodon contortrix Agkistrodon piscivorus
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Anatomy and Phylogeny of the Cloacae of Salamanders (Amphibia: Caudata)
    JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY 211:63-72 (1992) Comparative Anatomy and Phylogeny of the Cloacae of Salamanders (Amphibia: Caudata). Ill. Amphiumidae DAVID M. SEVER Department of Biology, Saint Mary's College, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556 ABSTRACT Histological descriptions of female and male cloacae are pre- sented for the three species of Amphiuma. Little interspecific variation occurs in either females or males. Females possess numerous spermathecae around the walls of the posterior cloacal tube and anterior cloacal chamber as well as rudimentary vent glands, of uncertain homology, in the caudal end of the cloacal chamber. Ventral glands such as those known from female salamanders in other families are absent, likely a secondary loss in the amphiumid clade. In a female A. tridactylum with large ovarian follicles (5- to 8-mm diameter), the lips of the cloacal orifice are highly cornified, and stored sperm in the spermath- ecae appear in organized bundles, either free in the lumen or with the sperm heads seemingly buried in the spermathecal epithelium. Males possess some gland clusters present in other members of the suborder Salamandroidea (dorsal pelvic glands, vent glands, Kingsbury's glands, anterior ventral glands) but lack others (lateral pelvic glands, posterior ventral glands), resulting in the most plesiomorphic cloacal anatomy in the suborder. However, males possess an autapomorphic gland cluster, called the pit glands, in the posterior wall of the cloacal chamber. The pit glands consist of shallow infoldings of the cloacal epithelium unlike other cloacal glands, which are relatively tubular and elon- gate. The "pits" contain columnar eosinophilic cells that give positive staining reactions for acid mucopolysaccharides and proteins.
    [Show full text]
  • Salamander Found in China Oldest of Its Kind 13 March 2012, by Bob Yirka
    Salamander found in China oldest of its kind 13 March 2012, by Bob Yirka After studying the finds, the research duo suggested that the salamanders likely diverged from others of its kind earlier than had been commonly believed. The early date also puts the salamanders in the Jurassic period, and beats the previous record of the oldest known salamander by 40 million years. A salamander specimen found in Spain dated back to 114 million years ago. This makes B. jianpingensis the oldest know subspecies of Salamandroidea, which are the ancestors of the 557 different species of salamanders that are still around today. The two describe the specimens as exceptionally well preserved with fully articulated skeletons and with gills that they describe as bony. This, they say was due to their being embedded in volcanic ash which covered the dry lake bed. They also note that Holotype of Beiyanerpeton jianpingensis, gen. et sp. several other smaller salamander specimens were nov. a nearly complete skeleton in ventral view. Image found in the same area, but they don’t know yet if (c) PNAS, doi:10.1073/pnas.1009828109 they are juveniles, or a different species altogether. They also point out that these new specimens differ markedly from the previous record holder found in Spain, which means that can’t be included in the (PhysOrg.com) -- Six salamander specimens were same family; they are described as much more found in an ancient dry lakebed in China recently primitive. and now the team of Ke-Qin Gao from Peking University and Neil H. Shubinb of the University of More information: Late Jurassic salamandroid Chicago has identified them as the oldest from western Liaoning, China, PNAS, Published Salamandroidea specimens ever found.
    [Show full text]