DOCSLIB.ORG

The Purposes and Principles of the Un Charter Origins

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Purposes and Principles of the Un Charter Origins security and human rights 28 (2017) 180-213 brill.com/shrs The Purposes and Principles of the un Charter Origins, Subsequent Developments in Law and Practice and (Mis)interpretation in the Context of Unilateral Secession Claims in the osce Area Tofig F. Musayev * ll.m in International Human Rights Law, University of Essex, u.k., Counsellor, Permanent Mission of Azerbaijan to the u.n. [email protected] Rovshan Sadigbayli m.a. in International Relations, Bilkent University, Turkey, Counsellor, Permanent Mission of Azerbaijan to the o.s.c.e. [email protected] Abstract The article reviews the purposes and principles of the u.n. Charter in light of persistent claims voiced in the context of protracted conflicts in the osce area that the principle of self-determination allegedly grants the right to unilateral secession. The drafting history of the Charter indicate that States did not recognise a right to unilateral seces- sion of a part of population of a State as a means of exercising self- determination. Subsequent development of this principle in law and in practice in the decades after the adoption of the Charter to a large extent has been shaped by the original ideas and understanding that went into the Charter. Invalidation at the international level of secessionist claims and actions, collective non-recognition of the resulting situa- tions and abstention from aid or assistance that contributes to their consolidation are among legal and political consequences that have been applied and need to be con- sistently maintained with regard to the protracted conflicts in the osce area and their settlement processes. * The opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors. © Tofig F. Musayev and Rovshan Sadigbayli, 2019 | doi 10.1163/18750230-02801006 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the prevailing CC-BY-NC license at the time of publication. Downloaded from Brill.com09/30/2021 04:04:55AM via free access <UN> The Purposes and Principles of the un Charter 181 Keywords un Charter – self-determination – territorial integrity – protracted conflicts Introduction The misconception of perceived contradiction between the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples and the principle of territorial integ- rity of States is deeply rooted in the academic community and the political domain alike.1 This dichotomy is nowhere more acute than in the context of the protracted conflicts in the osce area.2 The primary purpose of this article is not a detailed account of the historical background and political dynamics of these conflicts, which have been reviewed elsewhere.3 Rather, the focus of 1 See, for example, J. Summers, ‘The Rhetoric and Practice of Self-Determination: A Right of All Peoples or Political Institutions?’, in Nordic Journal of International Law, 2004, no. 73; J. Falkowski, ‘Secessionary Self-Determination: A Jeffersonian Perspective’, in Boston Univer- sity International Law Journal, 1991, no. 209; Z. Velasco, ‘Self-determination and Secession: Human Rights-based Conflict Resolution’, in International Community Law Review, 2014, no. 16; E. Laing, ‘The Norm of Self-Determination, 1941–1991’, in California Western International Law Journal, 1992, no. 209; M. Gunter, ‘Self-Determination or Territorial Integrity: The Unit- ed Nations in Confusion’ in World Affairs, 1979, no. 3, pp. 203–216; O. Kamanu, ‘Secession and the Right of Self-Determination: An O.A.U. Dilemma’ in The Journal of Modern African Studies, 1974, no. 3, pp. 355–376; M. Islam, ‘Secessionist Self-Determination: Some Lessons from Katanga, Biafra and Bangladesh’ in Journal of Peace Research, 1985, no. 3, pp. 211–221; L. Brilmayer, ‘Secession and Self-Determination: A Territorial Interpretation’, in Yale Journal of International law, 1991, no. 177; F. Kirgis, ‘The Degrees of Self-Determination in the United Nations Era’ in The American Journal of International Law, 1994, no. 2, pp. 304–310; Repertoire of Practice of the u.n. Security Council, Consideration of the provisions of Article 1, Paragraph 2 of the Charter, 1975–1980, pp. 407–408. 2 The term ‘protracted conflicts’ is often used to describe the conflicts in Abkhazia and South Ossetia (Georgia), the conflict in and around the Nagorno-Karabakh region of Azerbaijan, the Transdniestrian conflict in Moldova and the crisis in and around Ukraine. 3 See, for example, V. Lozinskiy, ‘The osce Mission in Nagorno-Karabakh’, in Journal of Interna- tional Peacekeeping, No. 1, 2000; A. Alexandru, ‘The Role of Mediation in Settling Protracted Conflicts. Case Study: The Transnistrian Conflict’, in Romanian Journal of International Law, No. 227, 2012; D. Lynch, ‘Separatist States and Post-Soviet Conflicts’, in International Affairs, 2002, No. 4; L. Laurinaviciute & L. Bieksa, ‘The relevance of remedial secession in the post- Soviet “frozen conflicts”, in International Comparative Jurisprudence, 2015, No. 66; Marie-Jose van Rie, “The Role of the osce in the Conflict in Georgia” in Security & Human Rights, 2009, No. 318; T.D. Grant, ‘Frozen Conflicts and International Law’, in Cornell International Law Journal, No. 361, 2017. security and human rights 28 (2017) 180-213 Downloaded from Brill.com09/30/2021 04:04:55AM via free access <UN> 182 Musayev and Sadigbayli this research is on a common feature pertaining to all these conflicts – claims that the principle of self-determination allegedly grants the right to unilateral secession. Proponents of this view often try to find support to their legal po- sition in the u.n. Charter and other international and regional documents.4 Given the implications of this theoretical discourse for the conflict settlement processes and its contribution to the intractability of these conflicts, it is worth briefly revisiting the Charter and other relevant documents to see whether such arguments really derive from them. Recourse to the drafting history of the u.n. Charter, by following the gen- eral rules of the interpretation of the treaties,5 will be particularly valuable for our analysis. The Documents of the United Nations Conference on International Organization,6 which is considered by the United Nations as a complete docu- mentary legislative history of the United Nations Conference,7 The Yearbook of 4 See, for example, on the conflicts in Georgia – Comment by the Information and Press De- partment on the 10th anniversary of the August 2008 events in the Caucasus, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, No. 1462-07-08-2018, 7 August 2018, <http://www .mid.ru/ru/foreign_policy/news/-/asset_publisher/cKNonkJE02Bw/content/id/3315007?p_p _id=101_INSTANCE_cKNonkJE02Bw&_ 101_INSTANCE_cKNonkJE02Bw_languageId=en_GB>; On the crisis in and around Ukraine – Provisional Verbatim Record of 7138th Meeting of the u.n.s.c., 15 March 2014, un Doc. S/pv.7138, <https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/ cf/%7b65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7d/s_pv_7138.pdf>; In the context of Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict, Note Verbale dated 21 March 2005 from the Permanent Mission of Armenia to the United Nations Office at Geneva addressed to the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Annex, ‘Legal Aspects for the Rights to Self- Determination in the Case of Nagorny Karabakh’, u.n. Doc. E/cn.4/2005/G/23. 5 For the general rules of interpretation of the treaties, see articles 31 and 32, Vienna Conven- tion on the Law of Treaties, 8 ilm 679 (1969); B. Simma, D.-E. Khan, G. Nolte, A. Paulus, (ed.), The Charter of the United Nations. A Commentary, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012, 3rd ed, vol. i, pp. 75–79. 6 Documents of the United Nations Conference on International Organization, San Francisco, (1945), vol. i–xxii, available at <http://digitallibrary.un.org/record/1300969?ln=en>. 7 The United Nations Conference on International Organization (referred to as u.n.c.i.o. or the Conference) convened in San Francisco, California, from 25 April–26 June 1945, for the purpose of drafting the Charter and the Statute of the International Court of Justice. The Conference had a complex organization and structure, divided into four Commissions tasked to recommend to the Conference action upon draft proposals submitted to it by the twelve drafting technical committees and sub-committees and four general committees. For the modalities of the Conference, see Doc. 25, dc/1, u.n.c.i.o. Documents, vol. v; Doc. 31, dc/6, April 27, u.n.c.i.o. Documents, vol. v, pp. 125–126. No stenographic transcript of proceedings of the Conference was kept except at the plenary sessions and public meet- ings of the Commissions. For all other meetings the Secretariat prepared a summary of the security and humanDownloaded rights from 28 Brill.com09/30/2021 (2017) 180-213 04:04:55AM via free access <UN> The Purposes and Principles of the un Charter 183 the United Nations 1946–1947,8 reports of participating governments and aca- demic research, provide useful insight into the negotiations of the Charter and its subsequent interpretation and will be consulted, where appropriate.9 The pages that follow will show that the development of the principle of self-determination in the decades after the adoption of the u.n. Charter to a large extent has been shaped by the original ideas and understanding that went into the Charter. The un Charter: Emergence of the Rules-based International Order While reviewing the Charter, one should follow the prescription of its draft- ers, who viewed the Purpose of the Charter as indivisible part with other pro- visions, namely Preamble and Principles, each of them being “equally valid, binding and operative”.10 The rapporteur of the drafting Committee11 observed discussions and of the decisions reached. Doc. 25, dc/1, u.n.c.i.o. Documents, vol. v, p. 19; Doc. 177, st/5, vol. v, p. 200. 8 Yearbook of the United Nations 1946–1947, (1947).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Congressional Record—House H3697
    July 23, 2020 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE H3697 As the youngest speaker at the March on ‘‘The United States will continue to great effect in changing hearts and Washington, his was a clarion call to end ra- stand by these principles, because of minds by meeting hate with love, and cial segregation and discrimination in the the conviction of the American people cruelty with kindness. United States. Over half a century later, as that unless the doctrine in which these I will forever remember and cherish unrest over systemic violence against Black Americans gripped our Nation in recent principles are inherent once again gov- the opportunity to join John Lewis in weeks, John reinforced what he knew was erns the relations between nations, the Selma, Alabama, this past March with true: rule of reason, of justice and of law—in my husband, my mom, and two daugh- ‘‘You cannot stop the call of history,’’ the other words, the basis of modern civili- ters. The time he spent with Grace and Congressman said. ‘‘You may use troopers. zation itself—cannot be preserved.’’ Caroline, describing to them what You may use fire hoses and water, but it can- Mr. Speaker, this declaration here re- ‘‘good trouble’’ was; walking across the not be stopped. There cannot be any turning fused to recognize the Soviet annex- Edmund Pettus Bridge one last time, back. We have come too far. We have made too much progress to stop now and go back.’’ ation of Estonia, Latvia, and Lith- and reminding us what happened there John was witness to our Nation’s history; uania.
    [Show full text]
  • BACKGROUNDER No
    BACKGROUNDER No. 3200 | APRIL 11, 2017 The Trump Administration and the 115th U.S. Congress Must Support Ukraine Luke Coffey and Daniel Kochis Abstract Ukraine is in the midst of a national struggle that will determine its fu- Key Points ture geopolitical orientation: the West or Moscow. Ukraine represents the idea in Europe that each country has the sovereign ability to deter- n In 2014, Russia invaded Ukraine. mine its own path and to decide with whom it has relations and how and Russia continues to illegally occupy by whom it is governed. Since 2014, Russia has been illegally occupying Crimea and has provoked and now supports a separatist movement in Ukraine’s Crimea peninsula and continues to stoke a deadly war in the eastern Ukraine that did not previ- east which has resulted in more than 10,000 deaths. Although Ukraine ously exist. is not a NATO member, there are things the U.S. can and should do to n help. These include continuing and expanding when necessary econom- The outcome of Ukraine’s struggle will have long-term implications for ic sanctions against Russia, providing advanced weaponry and mili- the transatlantic community and tary training to the Ukrainians; issuing a non-recognition declaration the notion of national sovereignty. over Crimea; pressuring Russia to live up to its commitments under the It is in America’s national inter- Minsk II cease-fire agreement; and helping Ukraine uproot entrenched est that Ukraine remains secure, corruption and cronyism within its economy and governing system. stable, and in full control of its ter- ritorial integrity.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Digest Chapter 9
    Contents CHAPTER 9 .................................................................................................................................. 346 Diplomatic Relations, Succession, Continuity of States, ....................................................... 346 and Other Statehood Issues ...................................................................................................... 346 A. DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS, SUCCESSION, AND CONTINUITY ISSUES ............. 346 1. Venezuela ......................................................................................................................... 346 2. Sudan................................................................................................................................ 351 3. South Sudan ..................................................................................................................... 352 4. Libya ................................................................................................................................ 354 5. Belarus ............................................................................................................................. 354 6. Western Sahara ................................................................................................................ 355 B. STATUS ISSUES.................................................................................................................. 356 1. Ukraine ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Administration of Donald J. Trump, 2018 Joint Statement—A
    Administration of Donald J. Trump, 2018 Joint Statement—A Declaration To Celebrate 100 Years of Independence of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania and Renewed Partnership April 3, 2018 The United States of America, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Latvia, and the Republic of Lithuania, Commemorating the centennial anniversary of independence of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania in 2018, Marking the beginning of diplomatic relations between the United States of America and Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania on July 28, 1922, Recalling the consistent recognition by the United States of America of the independence of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania including through the Welles Declaration of July 23, 1940, Recalling the commitments made by the United States of America and Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania under the Charter of Partnership Among the United States of America and the Republic of Estonia, Republic of Latvia, and Republic of Lithuania of January 16, 1998, Acknowledging the tremendous progress achieved by Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania in political stability, economic growth, and security cooperation and the contributions of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania to European and international security and advancement of democratic values through their memberships in NATO and the European Union, Desiring to create a blueprint for expanding and strengthening cooperation between the United States of America and Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, Affirm the following principles and ideals to guide the further development of mutually beneficial relations: Principles of Partnership The United States of America and Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania share the view that peace, security and prosperity depend on strong sovereign nations that respect their citizens at home and cooperate to promote peace abroad.
    [Show full text]
  • Latvia and US Economic Relations: Trade, Investment and Representation by Kristaps Supe 128
    Latvia and the United States: Revisiting a Strategic Partnership in a Transforming Environment Editors: Andris Spruds and Diana Potjomkina Latvian Institute of International Affairs Riga, 2016 Railway infrastructure services Editors: Andris Spruds, Diana Potjomkina Authors: Maris Andzans, Kristine Berzina, Edijs Boss, Jon Dunne, Ilze Garoza, Donald N. Jensen, Alise Krapane, Matthew Melino, Magnus Nordenman, Diana Potjomkina, Jeffrey Rathke, Gunda Reire, Edward Rhodes, Ugis Romanovs, Liga Smildzina-Bertulsone, Andris Spruds, Kristaps Supe Scientific reviewers:Valters Scerbinskis, Toms Rostoks The opinions expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the positions of the Latvian Institute of International Affairs, any of the sponsors, any governmental or other entity. English language editor*: Emily Kernot, SIA endtoend editing Layout and cover design: Liga Rozentale *English language editing has been performed for select chapters. The book is published in collaboration with the Publishers Zinātne ISBN 978-9984-583-70-9 UDK 327(474.3:73) Sp950 © Authors of the articles, 2016 © Liga Rozentale, layout and cover design, 2016 © Latvian Institute of International Affairs, 2016 his is a book about building bridges and strengthening the partnership between Latvia and the United States. The pub- Tlication Latvia and the United States: Revisiting the Strategic Partnership in a Transforming Environment continues the tradi- tion of a thorough and regular re-assessment of bilateral engage- ment between the two nations. The publication starts with an analysis of relations in a wider historical and regional context and further deals with security and defence matters and coop- eration; economic cooperation; as well as trajectories of people- to-people diplomacy and the important role of Latvian diaspora in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Baltic States: Why the United States Must Strengthen Security Cooperation Luke Coffey
    BACKGROUNDER No. 2851 | OCTOBER 25, 2013 The Baltic States: Why the United States Must Strengthen Security Cooperation Luke Coffey Abstract The three Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania have proven Key Points to be staunch American allies since they regained their independence in the early 1990s. Since the fall of the Soviet Union, each has made ■■ The U.S. has been a longtime huge progress in implementing democracy, rule of law, economic supporter of the sovereignty and freedom, and developing a strong national defense. They accomplished territorial integrity of Estonia, this by aligning themselves with the West—particularly the United Latvia, and Lithuania. States—while rejecting Russian calls to remain neutral or inside the ■■ The three Baltic states con- Russian sphere of influence after the end of the Cold War. While small tribute at a disproportionately in size and population, the Baltic states represent something much higher level than other European countries to NATO-led military bigger geopolitically: They are staunch defenders of economic freedom, operations because they want liberal democracy, and human rights. The U.S. should deepen the U.S.– to be seen as “net contributors,” Baltic defense and security relationship by proactively seeking new not “net consumers,” of security. areas of cooperation and building on old ties. It is in America’s as well Therefore, they expect NATO as NATO’s interests to do so. and the U.S. to come to their aid if needed. he three Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania have ■■ The Baltic states are shaping the Tproven to be staunch American allies since they regained their future of NATO.
    [Show full text]
  • The Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania, Expressing Its
    SEIMAS OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA RESOLUTION ON THE CONSOLIDATION OF THE STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 5 January 2021 No XIV-150 Vilnius The Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania, expressing its appreciation of the long-term historical ties underpinned by mutual trust between the Republic of Lithuania and the United States of America (US), acknowledging the decisive role of the US and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in ensuring security and stability in Europe and throughout the world, appreciating in particular the US policy of non-recognition of the occupation and annexation of the Baltic States as enshrined in the Sumner Welles Declaration of 23 July 1940, emphasising Lithuania’s strong support for democratic values, peace and security pursued through Lithuania’s membership of NATO, the European Union (EU), the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, and the United Nations, noting that Lithuania is a responsible NATO member country that adheres firmly to the commitment to allocate 2 per cent of its gross domestic product (GDP) for defence needs, and contributes to ensuring security in the region and the world by participating in international missions and operations, taking leadership in the areas of democracy development, energy and cyber security, and expressing readiness to organise the Summit of NATO Heads of State and Government in Vilnius in 2022, stressing that the US is the key strategic partner and ally in ensuring the security, stability
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H3696
    H3696 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE July 23, 2020 ‘‘gave a little blood.’’ In fact, John John Robert Lewis that made that as- 800,000 Pennsylvanians, lack access. It gave so much more than that. He gave surance true, that made our Nation is imperative that we do what we can his country his all, and he was willing more perfect and made our form of gov- to address this critical digital divide. to give his life to make America a ernment turn towards justice. The CARES Act provided $100 million more perfect Union, but he never gave John Lewis earned the respect of for the ReConnect Pilot Program, himself over to anger or allowed him- men, women, and little children, and which provides grants for the costs of self to harbor hatred in his heart for he made our world and our community broadband infrastructure development those who persecuted him. and our Nation much better than he and improvement in rural areas. The In a true mark of his character, he found it. CARES Act also provided $25 million famously forgave George Wallace, say- My prayers are with his family and for the Distance Learning, Telemedi- ing: ‘‘. to do otherwise—to hate every seeker of justice who mourns cine, and Broadband program. him—would only perpetuate the evil him today. These funds will certainly have an system we sought to destroy.’’ Thank you, brother Lewis. Thank impact on distance learning in the age John continued: ‘‘Our ability to for- you. of coronavirus, but broadband give serves a higher moral purpose in Rest in peace.
    [Show full text]
  • 92 HANNA MARCZEWSKA-ZAGDAŃSKA Było Prowadzenie Obserwacji I Analiz Procesów I Zjawisk Zachodzących W Sąsiadującej Rosji
    Studia z Dziejów Rosji i Europy Środkowo-W schodniej XLII1 PL ISSN 1230-5057 HANNA MARCZEWSKA-ZAGDAŃSKA STANY ZJEDNOCZONE WOBEC PAKTU RIBBENTROP-MOŁOTOW I LOSU REPUBLIK BAŁTYCKICH: LITWY, ŁOTWY I ESTONII (1939-1941) Republiki bałtyckie — Litwa, Łotwa i Estonia zajmowały ogólnie w polityce amery­ kańskiej w dwudziestoleciu międzywojennym dość odległe, peryferyjne miejsce. Ich niepodległość, choć oficjalnie ogłoszona przez Estonię i Litwę w lutym 1918, a Łotwę w październiku 1918, nie od razu została zaakceptowana w Waszyngtonie. Nawet uzna­ nie przez Rosję Sowiecką i oficjalne zrzeczenie się jej roszczeń terytorialnych w 1920 wobec Bałtyki1 oraz przyjęcie trzech republik bałtyckich do Ligi Narodów w 1921 nie­ wiele zmieniło w samym podejściu Amerykanów. W administracji Wilsona hołdowano bowiem idei nieuznawania Rosji Radzieckiej i wynikającej z niej koncepcji lansowanej przez sekretarza stanu — Bainbridge’a Colby’ego — o niepodzielności Imperium Rosyj­ skiego (za wyjątkiem Polski, Finlandii i Armenii). Dopiero w lipcu 1922 za prezydentury Warrena Hardinga po zarzuceniu sztywnego kursu dotyczącego nieakceptowania zmian granic Rosji, możliwe było oficjalne uznanie przez Stany Zjednoczone Litwy, Łotwy i Estonii oraz nawiązanie stosunków dyplomatycznych. Poselstwa amerykańskie w Ry­ dze, Tallinie i Kownie rozpoczęły rutynowe prace pod kierunkiem jednego wspólnego posła amerykańskiego: Fredericka W. B. Colemana w latach 1922-1931, Roberta P. Skin- nera — 1931-1933, Johna Van A. MacMurray’a — 1933-1936, Arthura Bliss Lane’a — 1936-1937. Od 1937 wyodrębniona Litwa otrzym ała niezależnego posła Owena J. C. Norema — 1937-1940, podczas gdy na Łotwie i Estonii funkcję tę pełnił John C. Wiley — 1938-1940. Nawiązanie stosunków dyplomatycznych jedynie z trzema republikami bałtyckimi (łącznie 3,5 mln ludności), przy jednoczesnym nieutrzymywaniu oficjalnych stosun­ ków dyplomatycznych ze Związkiem Sowieckim (160 mln ludności), wytwarzało dość kłopotliwą dla Departamentu Stanu lukę informacyjną.
    [Show full text]
  • 1276Th PLENARY MEETING of the COUNCIL
    PC.JOUR/1276 Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe 23 July 2020 Permanent Council Original: ENGLISH Chairmanship: Albania 1276th PLENARY MEETING OF THE COUNCIL 1. Date: Thursday, 23 July 2020 (in the Neuer Saal and via video teleconferencing) Opened: 10.05 a.m. Suspended: 1.15 p.m. Resumed: 3 p.m. Closed: 7 p.m. 2. Chairperson: Ambassador I. Hasani Prior to taking up the agenda, the Chairperson reminded the Permanent Council of the technical modalities for the conduct of meetings of the Council during the COVID-19 pandemic. 3. Subjects discussed – Statements – Decisions/documents adopted: Agenda item 1: ADDRESS BY THE CHAIR OF THE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE AND ALTERNATE MINISTER FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF GREECE, H.E. MR. MILTIADIS VARVITSIOTIS Chairperson, Chair of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe (PC.DEL/998/20 OSCE+), Germany-European Union (with the candidate countries Albania, Montenegro, North Macedonia and Serbia; the country of the Stabilisation and Association Process and potential candidate country Bosnia and Herzegovina; the European Free Trade Association countries Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway, members of the European Economic Area; as well as Andorra, Armenia, Georgia, Moldova, San Marino and Ukraine, in alignment) (PC.DEL/1039/20), Russian Federation (PC.DEL/987/20), United States of America (PC.DEL/986/20), Turkey (PC.DEL/1049/20 OSCE+), Azerbaijan (PC.DEL/996/20 OSCE+) (PC.DEL/997/20 OSCE+), Kazakhstan (PC.DEL/1046/20 OSCE+), Switzerland (PC.DEL/1017/20 OSCE+), Georgia
    [Show full text]
  • The Russia Conference Papers 2021 2
    The Conference on Russia Papers 2021 1 The Russia Conference Papers 2021 2 You will not grasp her with your mind or cover with a common label, for Russia is one of a kind – believe in her, if you are able… Fyodor Tyutchev Th e United States Congress’ sanctions are squeezing Russia out from Europe. Vladimir Putin, Valdai Discussion Club, 2017 In Europe we were Tatars, while in Asia we can be Europeans. Fyodor Dostoevsky To stand up for truth is nothing. For truth, you must sit in jail. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Candle in the Wind 3 THE RUSSIA CONFERENCE PAPERS 2021 Chief Editor, Dr. Sandis ŠRĀDERS, Baltic Defence College Editor, Dr. Viljar VEEBEL, Baltic Defence College 4 Th e Baltic Defence College Chief Editor: Dr. Sandis Šrāders Editor: Dr. Viljar Veebel Reviewers: – Dr. Illimar Ploom, Assistant Professor, Estonian Military Academy – Dr. Vladimir Sazonov, Researcher, Estonian Academy of Security Studies and University of Tartu – Dr. Christopher P. Murray, Lecturer, Baltic Defence College – George Spencer Terry, University of Tartu – Michael G. Dvorak (LTC), Baltic Defence College – Danny Looney (LTC), Baltic Defence College Cover page: Raido Saar ISBN 978-9949-03-568-7 (print) ISBN 978-9949-03-569-4 (PDF) Copyright: authors and Baltic Defence College, 2021 University of Tartu Press www.tyk.ee Foreword 5 Foreword Brigadier General Ilmar Tamm, Commandant of the Baltic Defence College Th e security of a state is the key to its wealth, stability, and welfare. As per the words of former Estonian President Lennart Meri during the College’s inaugural ceremony on 25th of February 1999, “Security is precious, and there is never too much of it.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Section
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 116 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 166 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, JULY 23, 2020 No. 130 Senate The Senate met at 9:30 a.m. and was of State Sumner Welles issued a state- were sacrificing for their fellow Ameri- called to order by the President pro ment outlining U.S. policy toward the cans. tempore (Mr. GRASSLEY). Soviet Union’s annexation of the Baltic There is no doubt that containing f States. It began: ‘‘During these past this virus has caused economic pain few days the devious processes not seen since the Great Depression. PRAYER whereunder the political independence Hopefully, we are racing toward a vac- The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- and territorial integrity of the three cine answer to this pandemic. In the fered the following prayer: small Baltic Republics—Estonia, Lat- meantime, Americans must continue Let us pray. via, and Lithuania—were to be delib- to sacrifice, just as previous genera- We acknowledge today, O Lord, Your erately annihilated by one of their tions did for the sake of their neigh- power, mercy, and grace. We need Your more powerful neighbors, have been bors, families, friends, and loved ones. power, for the challenges we face re- rapidly drawing to their conclusion.’’ Make no mistake, we will beat this quire more than human wisdom. We It expressed the sympathy of the peo- virus, and the United States of Amer- need Your mercy, for we transgress ple of the United States for democratic ica will emerge stronger and even more Your love and fall short of Your glory.
    [Show full text]