College Voice Vol. 7 No. 18
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Connecticut College Digital Commons @ Connecticut College 1983-1984 Student Newspapers 5-1-1984 College Voice Vol. 7 No. 18 Connecticut College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/ccnews_1983_1984 Recommended Citation Connecticut College, "College Voice Vol. 7 No. 18" (1984). 1983-1984. 1. https://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/ccnews_1983_1984/1 This Newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Newspapers at Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1983-1984 by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author. VOL. VII No. 18 SGA Executive Board Elected vote, in the case 783 votes Among other campaign Priscilla Geigis, who ran their ballots was too time' cast. According to Brain goals, Babcock would like to uncontested for the position of consuming, - slowing up -the Babcock wins by 12 Crawford, Vice-President of improve communication J-board chairman received voting process and SGA and election board between SGA and the college 751 votes with 247 people discouraging people to vote. chairman, there were no community. "The main thing abstaining from that contest. He would also like to see by Dave Tyler problems with the second is to get the SGA newsletter In another uncontested House Presidents taking a In the rerun of SGA election. "It wentwell. It went going again," Babcock said. race, G75 cast their vote for bigger role in promoting and Executive Board elections absolutely well. My election "Also, make the SGA !lisa Sohmer for the post of publicizing the elections. In held last Wednesday and board was given specific executive board more visible SAC Chairman. There were regard to the suspended first Thursday, Ann Babcock instructions on what to do and as a whole. I will go to each 321 abstensions. election Crawford stated, "I narrowly defeated Steve not to do and given dorm at least once a think what happened was Jacobsen for SGA President. procedures; t.othe best of my semester, so that people know On the whole, Brian unfortunate. It was more Janet Christofano easily won knowledge they were who's on SGA." .Crawford thought the second mistakes than anything else. the Vice-Presidential race. followed." Babcock said she would not runoff went smoothly. He did I don't think it was anybody The positions of J-Board The rerun resulted in an continue her ties with the comment that the rule knowledgeably doing Chairman and SAC Chairman extremely close Presidential Volee except in small requiring voters to initial anything wrong." went uncontested. race with Ann Babcock capacities like distribution. The election was held again beating Steve Jacobsen by She commented, "I hope that because of confusion over only 12 votes; 387 to 375. next year the paper is not voting procedures in the first There were 249 abstensions biased in my favor. I also Perspectives on Admissions run off. There had been (votes for write-in candidate hope they don't go in the other difficulties reaching quorum, Dave Cook counted for zero direction. I think it's the by Leslie S. Lamkin Acceptance letters were uncertainty about wr-ite-in as he was an ineligible paper's position to be critical . "This year approximau.ly mailed out by April 6. On candidates and problems candidate. His votes were of SGA. __ I think they're 3,G50 applications were April 1G and 18 the with peopies names being counted as part of the ab- supposed to watch out." submitted to Connecticut . prospective Freshmen were checked off twice. Previous to stensions). Ann does not Babcock does not want to College. This marks an in- invited to an open house. ihis these elections, there were think the close margin will make sweeping campaign program, "lntroductor'Y minimal guidelines for the crease of nine percent over hamper her performance of promises. "I don't want to \ast -year's appUcat\ons. Of Days," commenced ~\th actual voting process; after the job of President. "I think. make any promises 1 can't the 3,G50 applications, about Opening Remarks by Oakes the first election was anyone who takes the job is keep because don't know r one-thf rd received ac- Ames and Jeanette B. Her- suspended SGA approved going to have to prove what the situation is going to ceptance letters from Conn. sey. Students, parents and eleven election guidelines themselves. I'm just going to be next year," she noted. "I The Admissions Staff expects gr andparen ts then attended that" included the provision have more people wondering don't think anybody can go in a yield of one-third from classes, and chose from a for students to produce their at first if I'm going to be able there and redo the whole students receiving ac- variety of scheduled tours. In's and initial their names to handle it." Crawford system. Each situation has to ceptances. The target figure Academic, student Hfe, on the class lists. With the agrees but thinks thenumber be looked at as it stands at for each class is about 440 athletics, and career panels help of the new rules, of people who participated in that point." students. Many qualified were held throughout the day publicity generated by the the election is more im- In the Yice-Pr-es iden tfa! applicants, accepted by our and opportunities to meet revote and a fair, sunny day. race Janet Christofano portant. "The turn" out was competitor schools have been individually to discuss the second running achieved good even if the election was defeated T. Dan Besse by a turned down by Connecticut. financial aid, admissions, and quorum on the first day of close. A huge portion of the lopsided margin gaining G7I Admissions will spend the opportunities in community voting. Quorum is 50 percent campus spoke their minds," votes to his 189 with 14Gab- last weeks of April and all of service. of the student body plus one said Crawford. staining. May juggling those accepted On Monday April IG, 131 who have chosen Connecticut, prospective freshmen and 114 with those on the waiting list parents arrived. While on for available spots. Wednesday April 18, there More women still apply were 171 prospective fresh- Court Limits Students' Rights than men. However, a men and - 13G parents. The greater percentage of men latter figure is 50 students more than have ever arrived NEW YORK, NY _(CPS) - against them, provide an hearings a year on the SUNY qualify for admission than at a Conn Open House. The Striking down a lower court open hearing in which the campuses would place "an women. The application beautiful weather Wednesday decision that would have student can call one witness, absolutely intolerable burden process is an ongoing one. following the rain on Monday resulted in sweeping changes and provide students with a on the university." During October, prospective probably contributed to the in the ways colleges notice of what final penalties, "Due process does not freshmen are sought out influx in Wednesday's discipline their students, the if any, are imposed on them. require a full adversarial throughou t the country. response. New, York Supreme Court This student, Marguerite hearing," . Crary contends. During February and March The Admissions Staff, the Appellate Division last week Moresco, asserted she was "The student had the right to the immense amount of in- Kitchen Staff, and campus ruled that students' con- entitled to the same confront witnesses, be formation on each application tour guides W(\[{' '3.11surprised stitutional rights to due represented by someone in is reviewed by three staff professional representation by the positive response. process don't always apply to the college community, and members. Each reads ap- and review of the written Many students came to the disciplinary procedures. receive complete written proximately 2,000 ap- proceedings she would have College for the first time, The court said a State charges against her." plications. For March and the in protecting herself in a civil especially those from out of University of New York at or criminal court. Yet in many school first week in April all staff state. There has been an Cortland student didn't have New York's State Supreme discipline situations, the legal members, (six), take on the increase in geographic a right to have an attorney to Court - which is not the cards are already stacked job of making final diversity with the 1988 ap- represent her or to a review state's highest court - against students, the authors decisions. If all three agree plicants, noting Arizona, of written transcripts of the agreed with the student. of a new book about school on a student then that person California, New Mexico, Ohio university's decision to But now the appellate court discipline argue. is offered admission. If there and Texas. Of those students suspend her for a semester. has sided with SUNY, saying "school systems rarely is any disagreement, then who attend the annual Open SUNY officiais accused her the student's rights in "a have discipline cases that discussion follows. There House, about sixty percent of cheating twice. collegial atmosphere" were wind up in court," says Ellen seem s to be sixty to seventy will accept at Conn. This is But whether or not she had "best served by a nonad- Jane Hollingsworth, co- percent disagreement. partly a "self-selection" cheated was never the real versarial setting" without author of School Discipline, Michael Wilber described this process, for it is those issue.