N Scale SW1500 Locomotives & Train
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2018 Annual Report Built Drive to Growth
BUILT TO DRIVE GROWTH 2018 ANNUAL REPORT BUILT TO DRIVE BUILT GROWTH CP 2018 ANNUAL REPORT PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS $ in millions, except per share data, ratios or unless otherwise indicated 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 EXCHANGELISTINGS FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS Total revenues $ 6,620 $ 6,712 $ 6,232 $ 6,554 $ 7,316 The common shares of Canadian Pacific Railway Limited are (1) Operating income 2,202 2,618 2,411 2,519 2,831 listed on the Toronto and New York stock exchanges under Adjustedoperatingincome(1)(2) 2,198 2,550 2,411 2,468 2,831 the symbol CP. Operating ratio (1) 66.7% 61.0% 61.3% 61.6% 61.3% Adjusted operating ratio (1)(2) 66.7% 62.0% 61.3% 62.4% 61.3% Net income 1,476 1,352 1,599 2,405 1,951 Adjusted income (2) 1,482 1,625 1,549 1,666 2,080 CONTACTUS Diluted earnings per share (EPS) 8.46 8.40 10.63 16.44 13.61 Investor Relations AdjusteddilutedEPS(2) 8.50 10.10 10.29 11.39 14.51 Email: [email protected] Cash from operations 2,123 2,459 2,089 2,182 2,712 Free cash (2) 969 1,381 1,007 874 1,289 Canadian Pacific Investor Relations Return on invested capital (ROIC) (2) 14.4% 12.9% 14.4% 20.5% 15.3% 7550 Ogden Dale Road S.E. Adjusted ROIC (2) 14.5% 15.2% 14.0% 14.7% 16.2% Calgary, AB, Canada T2C 4X9 Shareholder Services STATISTICAL HIGHLIGHTS(3) Email: [email protected] Revenue ton-miles (RTMs) (millions) 149,849 145,257 135,952 142,540 154,207 Canadian Pacific Shareholder Services Carloads (thousands) 2,684 2,628 2,525 2,634 2,740 Office of the Corporate Secretary Gross ton-miles (GTMs) (millions) 272,862 263,344 242,694 252,195 275,362 7550 Ogden Dale Road S.E. -
Prices and Costs in the Railway Sector
ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE FÉDÉRALEDE LAUSANNE ENAC - INTER PRICESPRICES AND AND COSTS COSTS ININ THE THE RAILWAY RAILWAY SECTOR SECTOR J.P.J.P. Baumgartner Baumgartner ProfessorProfessor JanuaryJanuary2001 2001 EPFL - École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne LITEP - Laboratoire d'Intermodalité des Transports et de Planification Bâtiment de Génie civil CH - 1015 Lausanne Tél. : + 41 21 693 24 79 Fax : + 41 21 693 50 60 E-mail : [email protected] LIaboratoire d' ntermodalité des TEP ransports t de lanification URL : http://litep.epfl.ch TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. FOREWORD 1 2. PRELIMINARY REMARKS 1 2.1 The railway equipment market 1 2.2 Figures and scenarios 1 3. INFRASTRUCTURES AND FIXED EQUIPMENT 2 3.1 Linear infrastructures and equipment 2 3.1.1 Studies 2 3.1.2 Land and rights 2 3.1.2.1 Investments 2 3.1.3 Infrastructure 2 3.1.3.1 Investments 2 3.1.3.2 Economic life 3 3.1.3.3 Maintenance costs 3 3.1.4 Track 3 3.1.4.1 Investment 3 3.1.4.2 Economic life of a main track 4 3.1.4.3 Track maintenance costs 4 3.1.5 Fixed equipment for electric traction 4 3.1.5.1 Investments 4 3.1.5.2 Economic life 5 3.1.5.3 Maintenance costs 5 3.1.6 Signalling 5 3.1.6.1 Investments 5 3.1.6.2 Economic life 6 3.1.6.3 Maintenance costs 6 3.2 Spot fixed equipment 6 3.2.1 Investments 7 3.2.1.1 Points, switches, turnouts, crossings 7 3.2.1.2 Stations 7 3.2.1.3 Service and light repair facilities 7 3.2.1.4 Maintenance and heavy repair shops for rolling stock 7 3.2.1.5 Central shops for the maintenance of fixed equipment 7 3.2.2 Economic life 8 3.2.3 Maintenance costs 8 4. -
Transportation on the Minneapolis Riverfront
RAPIDS, REINS, RAILS: TRANSPORTATION ON THE MINNEAPOLIS RIVERFRONT Mississippi River near Stone Arch Bridge, July 1, 1925 Minnesota Historical Society Collections Prepared by Prepared for The Saint Anthony Falls Marjorie Pearson, Ph.D. Heritage Board Principal Investigator Minnesota Historical Society Penny A. Petersen 704 South Second Street Researcher Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 Hess, Roise and Company 100 North First Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 May 2009 612-338-1987 Table of Contents PROJECT BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................................. 1 RAPID, REINS, RAILS: A SUMMARY OF RIVERFRONT TRANSPORTATION ......................................... 3 THE RAPIDS: WATER TRANSPORTATION BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS .............................................. 8 THE REINS: ANIMAL-POWERED TRANSPORTATION BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS ............................ 25 THE RAILS: RAILROADS BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS ..................................................................... 42 The Early Period of Railroads—1850 to 1880 ......................................................................... 42 The First Railroad: the Saint Paul and Pacific ...................................................................... 44 Minnesota Central, later the Chicago, Milwaukee and Saint Paul Railroad (CM and StP), also called The Milwaukee Road .......................................................................................... 55 Minneapolis and Saint Louis Railway ................................................................................. -
40Thanniv Ersary
Spring 2011 • $7 95 FSharing tihe exr periencste of Fastest railways past and present & rsary nive 40th An Things Were Not the Same after May 1, 1971 by George E. Kanary D-Day for Amtrak 5We certainly did not see Turboliners in regular service in Chicago before Amtrak. This train is In mid April, 1971, I was returning from headed for St. Louis in August 1977. —All photos by the author except as noted Seattle, Washington on my favorite train to the Pacific Northwest, the NORTH back into freight service or retire. The what I considered to be an inauspicious COAST LIMITED. For nearly 70 years, friendly stewardess-nurses would find other beginning to the new service. Even the the flagship train of the Northern Pacific employment. The locomotives and cars new name, AMTRAK, was a disappoint - RR, one of the oldest named trains in the would go into the AMTRAK fleet and be ment to me, since I preferred the classier country, had closely followed the route of dispersed country wide, some even winding sounding RAILPAX, which was eliminat - the Lewis and Clark Expedition of 1804, up running on the other side of the river on ed at nearly the last moment. and was definitely the super scenic way to the Milwaukee Road to the Twin Cities. In addition, wasn’t AMTRAK really Seattle and Portland. My first association That was only one example of the serv - being brought into existence to eliminate with the North Coast Limited dated to ices that would be lost with the advent of the passenger train in America? Didn’t 1948, when I took my first long distance AMTRAK on May 1, 1971. -
Riding an Amtrak Train Cross-Country: a Unique View of America
Democracy Dies in Darkness Riding an Amtrak train cross-country: A unique view of America There I was, in the middle of the Rocky Mountains, looking down at the Colorado River. Animal tracks in the snow made a dotted line beside the water. But where, I wondered, were the bighorn sheep? The black bears? I pressed my nose to the glass and followed the tracks carefully, expecting — any second now — to see wildlife. I was in my 40th hour aboard Amtrak, nearly 2,000 miles into a 3,218-mile cross-country adventure. I’d packed five books, my laptop, several movies and hours of music, figuring that I’d have plenty of time to kill. But I hadn’t unpacked any of it. Instead, I was so enthralled by the landscape that I’d forgotten I was supposed to be bored. And at this moment, I was convinced that if I focused with all my might, I would spot an animal. Just then, the cafe car attendant yelled up from down below: “Other side!” As he sprinted up the stairs, a couple of us hurled ourselves to the right side of the car. “Did you see the elk?” he asked breathlessly. By that point, the elk were far behind us. I returned to my seat and resolved to enjoy the view, with or without giant creature sightings. But before long, the animal prints had lured my gaze back to the snow deep in the canyon, on the bank of the river. This wasn’t my first time in the middle of the Rockies. -
Mark Williams' Presentation California Zephyr
Three Railroads 2532 Miles Of Gorgeous Scenery Five Vista Domes The Most Talked About Train In America... Silver Thread to The West The History of the California Zephyr March 20, 1949 -March 20, 1970 Beginnings 1934 Pioneer Zephyr Streamlined Ralph Budd (CBQ) meets Edward Budd (Budd Corp.) Stainless steel and shotwelding Wildly successful = willing to take risks Beginnings Exposition Flyer – 1939 First through car train for CB&Q/DRGW/WP “Scheduling for Scenery” Dotsero Cutoff / Moffat Tunnel Traded time & distance for scenic beauty CZ Fun Fact #1 Beginnings 1940 Joint Meeting 1943 Informal Discussions Post-war RR's Awash With $ October 1945 Joint Contract First orders to Budd 1945 Revisions in 1946 & 1947 First deliveries 1948 Beginnings 1944 Cyrus Osborn's (General manager of EMD) grand idea 1944 trip Glenwood Canyon The Dome Car is born by rebuilding a standard Budd chair car (originally Silvery Alchemy) CZ Fun Fact #2 Dividing The Cost And Costs were dividedProfits by percentage of CZ route mileage (the Exposition Flyer route) CB&Q = 41% DRGW = 22% WP = 37% Profits were divided by percentage of short line route (the Overland Route), which cost WP 10% compared to CB&Q and DRGW share Dividing The Cost And Profits CB&Q owned 27 cars DRGW owned 15 cars WP owned 24 cars PRR leased 1 car Planning Menus Timing Governed by need to have the train in the Rockies and Feather River Canyon during daylight Layover time for through car was a casualty Staffing The Zephyrettes CZ Fun Fact #3 The Zephyrettes Planning -
The Canadian
THE CANADIAN 60 Years of Transcontinental Passenger Service 1955 - 2015 VOLUME 2: The VIA Rail Canada Era 1978 - 2015 C. van Steenis, Calgary, AB. April 2015 CONTENTS Though by no means complete, this series is a pictorial journal of Canadian Pacific Railway’s THE CANADIAN and VIA Rail’s CANADIAN marking 60 years of operation from the inaugural runs on 24 April 1955 to 2015; in four volumes: Vol. 1A: The Canadian Pacific Era 1955-1978 in Eastern Canada Vol. 1B: The Canadian Pacific Era 1955-1978 in Western Canada Vol. 2: The Via Rail Canada Era 1978-2015 Vol. 3: Motive Power & Passenger Equipment This Volume, Vol. 2, focuses on VIA Rail Canada’s ‘CANADIAN’, from Oct of 1978 to Jan 1990 on the Canadian Pacific Railway southern route and from January of 1990 on the Canadian National Railway northern route. The author wishes to express thanks to the following individuals who kindly provided photos and information for this volume: John P. Carter, Andy Cassidy, Bruce Chapman, Kevin Dunk, Raymond Farand, Phil Mason, Claude Prutton, Wilco van Schoonhoven and Ron Visockis. Special thanks to Bruce Chapman for reviewing this volume. Photo Credits: All photos are used with the permission of the photographers. The photos of the old stations from the early part of the 20th century are in the public domain; the copyright has expired. Cover Photo: KOKANEE PARK brings up the markers on Train No. 2, VIA’s CANADIAN at CN Home, AB., west of Jasper, on 10 April 2010, – Cor van Steenis Photo VIA 1147 (ex-CNR) Sleeper ERWOOD at Edmonton 04 Dec 1978 Cor van Steenis Photo THE VIA RAIL PASSENGER FLEET In March of 1978 Canadian National transferred most of its extensive passenger car fleet to VIA Rail, such as the ‘E’ sleeper ERWOOD (blt. -
CANADIAN PACIFIC Carmaoia^Ipaeifbc
CANADIAN PACIFIC CArMAOIA^iPAeiFBC Mail Tickets The Canadian Pacific Railway Passengers for inland destinations in Canada and the United States Owning and operating 21,000 miles of line, the Canadian Pacific are advised to purchase their rail tickets in Europe at the special provides the best route to all parts of Canada and the United reduced fares available only for Atlantic steamship passengers. States. The " Trans-Canada Limited" makes the journey from To destinations in Eastern Canada, First and Colonist Class Tickets Montreal to Vancouver (2,886 miles) in 891 hours, and from Toronto are sold, and to destinations in Western Canada, First, Second, and to Vancouver (2,706 miles) in 85 hours. Colonist Class Tickets are issued. To points in the United States, First-Class, and in a few cases Canadian Pacific Steamship Services Second-Class Tickets can be purchased. Canadian Pacific Steamships maintain services from Liverpool, Glasgow, Belfast, Southampton, Cobh (Queenstown), Hamburg, The Canadian Pacific Kx press Company Antwerp, and Cherbourg to Quebec and Montreal in summer, and This Company operates over the entire system of the Canadian to Saint John, New Brunswick, in winter. Pacific Railway and Su- . ;iv r\\ :J::u: • f From Vancouver the Company's magnificent " Empress " Steamers merchandise, money, and valuables to all parts. The safest way of run to Japan and China. Through bookings can also be made via carrying money is by Canadian Pacific Express Money Orders or Vancouver and Victoria, in connection with the Canadian- Travellers' -
1991 Rail Vs Truck Fuel Efficiency
Rail vs. Truck Fuel Efficiency: U.S. Department The Relative Fuel Efficiency of Truck of Transportation Competitive Rail Freight and Federal Railroad Administration Truck Operations Compared in a Range of Corridors Office of Policy FINAL REPORT Abacus Technology Corporation Chevy Chase, Maryland Moving America New Directions, New Opportunities DOT/FRA/RRP-91/2 April 1991 Document is available to the public through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161 Technical Report Documentation Page 1 • R e p o rt N o . 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catolog No. FRA-RRP-91-02 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Rail vs Truck Fuel Efficiency: The Relative Fuel Efficiency of Truck Competitive Rail Freight and Truck 6. Performing Organizotion Code Operations Compared in a Range of Corridors 8. -Performing Organization Report No. 7. Authors) Abacus Technology Corporation 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Abacus Technology Corporation 5454 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 1100 11. Contract or Grant No. DTFR-53-90-C-00017 Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address U.S. Department of Transportation Final Report Federal Railroad Administration Office of Policy, RRP-32 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, DC 20590 Federal Railroad Admin. 15. Supplementary Notes William Gelston (Chief, Economic Studies Division, FRA), Project Sponsor Marilyn W. Klein (Senior Policy Analyst, FRA), Project Monitor 16. Abstract This report summarizes the findings of a study to evaluate the fuel efficiency of rail freight operations relative to competing truckload service. The objective of the study was to identify the circumstances in which rail freight service offers a fuel efficiency advantage over alternative truckload options, and to estimate the fuel savings associated with using rail service. -
To Download Our June 2017 Magazine
SPECIAL ISSUE: SHORT LINES AND REGIONALS PLUS www.TrainsMag.com • June 2017 MAP: High speed in Japan p. 50 Big Boy update THE magazine of railroading p. 64 Short line of the future From sleepy road to unit train host p. 24 Aberdeen Carolina & Western hauls a unit How Pinsly ethanol train near holds on to Aquadale, N.C. its franchise p. 42 South Shore Freight p. 32 OmniTRAX’s rail and land strategy p. 52 © 2017 Kalmbach Publishing Co. This material may not be reproduced in any form without permission from the publisher. www.TrainsMag.com COVER STORY SLEEPY SHORT LINE TO BUSY UNIT TRAIN HOST Aberdeen Carolina & Western becomes short line of the future by Jim Wrinn IT IS DIFFICULT TO COMPREHEND, as cades ago, this branch was up becomes a chess game of finding frequent location for entertain- you stand on the edge of a for abandonment, was sold places for them. A modern ing customers and visitors. The country road in central North twice, and ended up in the 100,000-square-foot shop is ca- passenger cars are easy to spot Carolina, watching a long train hands of an unlikely out-of-state pable of handling not only the in the railroad’s signature ma- behind six-axle power make its businessman who immediately company’s maintenance and re- genta colors against the tall way along an undulating route realized he’d taken on a railroad building needs but that of con- pines of the Carolina Sandhills. of welded rail and deep ballast, with a daunting task: Keeping tract customers, as well. -
Product Guide
2019 PRODUCT GUIDE *Layout and photo by Jay Oberg Experience & Quality You Can Depend On Dear Model Railroader: Welcome to our 2019 Micro-Trains Product Guide. Located in Southern Oregon, Micro-Trains manufactures premier N and Z scale rolling stock, our popular Magne-Matic® Coupler Welcome System, and a variety of model railroad tools and accessories, in our 33,000 sq ft factory. And we’ve been at it for over 46 years! During 2019, we have an array of all new model railroad products, that we’ll be designing, tooling and producing for you, our valued customer. This year our new tooling will include our 11th Heavyweight Passenger car, in this series; the Single Window Coach Car. And given the popularity of our N scale DODX 68’ flat car with military loads; we’ll be producing our own injection-molded multipurpose, light 4-wheel drive military utility vehicle known as the Humvee, as the next military load for our DODX flat cars. Already underway, Micro-Trains has been enhancing our ever-popular 40’ and 50’ box cars by lowering the car’s underframe to the rail, and offering “cored through”, injection-molded roof walks, similar to what we’ve already done with our 50’ box car roof walks. In addition, we’re modifying the cars to body-mount couplers, and where appropriate adding etched metal brake platforms to the car ends. We’re essentially making the best N scale rolling stock, even better! In addition to tooling up all new rail cars and accessories, Micro-Trains continues the tradition of issuing prototypical railcar series during 2019; we’ll be introducing our “Farm- to-Table” Reefer series in both N and Z scale. -
Tennessean the Tennessean Was a Secondary Streamliner Run Jointly by the Southern Railway and Norfolk & Western Between Washington, DC, and Memphis, Tennessee
Prototype Consists Southern Railway - The Tennessean The Tennessean was a secondary streamliner run jointly by the Southern Railway and Norfolk & Western between Washington, DC, and Memphis, Tennessee. This was Southern’s third entry into the Washington-Memphis market, and was quite clearly a secondary train when compared to the likes of the Crescent or the Southerner. The Southern shepherded the train from Washington to Lynchburg, Virginia, where the N&W took over to Consist Bristol, Tennessee. There, the Southern took over the The consist, when inaugurated, was all-lightweight train again and brought it into Memphis. The train was except for the heavyweight sleepers at the rear. first run in 1941 and continued up until 1968, though Car Type Number Assignment service had steeply declined by then, similarly to all Baggage-Mail (60’ Rolling 1700-1701 Washington- streamliners. Post Office (RPO) Section) Chattanooga The Tennessean was never a particularly fast Baggage-Mail Storage 1750-1751 Ditto train – it only averaged a little less than forty miles per Baggage-Mail (30’ RPO 1725-1726 Chattanooga- hour either way – but, for many years, it provided a Section) Memphis direct link between Memphis, Washington, and points Baggage/Dormitory/22- 703-705 Washington- to the north. Because it was operated by both the N&W seat Coach Memphis and Southern, this train can provide modeling 52-seat partitioned Coach 903-905 Ditto opportunities for modelers of both railways. 56-seat Coach 806-814 Ditto Livery The cars of the Tennessean were painted a plain 48-seat Diner 3303-3304 Washington- silver color, with Southern lettering.