LSSIP 2020 - UNITED KINGDOM LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2020 1 - Implementation Overview
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
LSSIP 2020 - UNITED KINGDOM LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2020 1 - Implementation Overview Document Title LSSIP Year 2020 for United Kingdom Info Centre Reference 20/12/22/92 Date of Edition 18/03/2021 LSSIP Focal Point Craig King – [email protected] LSSIP Contact Person Maria LENNE-VAN WEGBERG - [email protected] EUROCONTROL/NMD/INF/PAS LSSIP Support Team [email protected] Status Released Intended for EUROCONTROL Stakeholders Available in https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky-implementation- monitoring Reference Documents LSSIP Documents https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky-implementation- monitoring Master Plan Level 3 – Plan https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm-master-plan- Edition 2020 implementation-plan-level-3 Master Plan Level 3 – Report https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm-master-plan- Year 2020 implementation-report-level-3 European ATM Portal https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/ STATFOR Forecasts https://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor FAB Performance Plan http://www.nats-uk.ead-it.com/ LSSIP Year 2020 United Kingdom Released Issue APPROVAL SHEET The following authorities have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2020 document and the signatures confirm the correctness of the reported information and reflect the commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 (Implementation View) – Edition 2020. Stakeholder / Name Position Signature and date Organisation UK Civil Aviation Jon ROUND Head of Airspace, Air Authority Traffic Management and Aerodromes (AAA) (Safety and Airspace Regulation Group (SARG)) NATS Mark ASQUITH Director Investment & Portfolio Strategy LSSIP Year 2020 United Kingdom Released Issue TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ............................................................................................ 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 19 1. National ATM Environment .......................................................... 20 Geographical Scope .......................................................................................... 20 National Stakeholders ...................................................................................... 22 2. Traffic and Capacity ...................................................................... 36 Evolution of traffic in United Kingdom ............................................................. 36 LONDON EN-ROUTE ACC .................................................................................. 37 LONDON TERMINAL CONTROL (TC).................................................................. 40 PRESTWICK ACC ................................................................................................ 43 3. Implementation Projects .............................................................. 45 National projects .............................................................................................. 45 Additional national projects ............................................................................. 48 FAB projects ...................................................................................................... 52 Multinational projects ...................................................................................... 52 4. Cooperation activities ................................................................... 56 FAB Co-ordination............................................................................................. 56 Multinational cooperation initiatives ............................................................... 56 5. Implementation Objectives Progress ............................................ 58 State View: Overall Objective Implementation Progress ................................. 58 Objective Progress per SESAR Essential Operational Changes ........................ 59 ICAO ASBU Implementation Progress .............................................................. 67 Detailed Objectives Implementation progress ................................................. 73 6. Annexes ...................................................................................... 142 A. Specialists involved in the ATM implementation reporting for UK ................ 142 B. National stakeholders organisation charts ..................................................... 143 C. Implementation Objectives’ links with other plans ....................................... 144 D. SESAR Solutions implemented in a voluntary way ......................................... 149 E. Surveillance (SUR) ........................................................................................... 171 F. Glossary of abbreviations ............................................................................... 177 LSSIP Year 2020 United Kingdom Released Issue Executive Summary National ATM Context Member State of: 1 Throughout this year the UK has been in transition to leave the EU on the 31st of December 2020 Throughout the year the United Kingdom remained engaged within the transition guidelines with the European Commission, the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) and EUROCONTROL in the development and implementation of a Single European Sky (SES) and EASA implementing regulations. The work required from the UK Department for Transport and the UK Civil Aviation Authority is substantial and includes significant resource in support of key SES programmes and implementation such as the Performance Scheme, FABs, Standardised European Rules of the Air, Common Requirements and SESAR - including the Pilot Common Project - in support of the Air Traffic Management (ATM) Master Plan. The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in the UK, which contribute to the compilation of this document, are the following: • UK Department for Transport (DfT) – The responsible government Department • UK Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) - National Supervisory Authority and Competent Authority • National Air Traffic Services (NATS) • Military Authorities • Heathrow Airport Holdings Limited, Global Infrastructure Partners (GIP), and Manchester Airports Group (MAG) • Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB) of the UK Department for Transport (DfT). LSSIP Year 2020 United Kingdom 1 Released Issue Traffic and Capacity Summer Forecast (May to October inclusive) -61.0% 2020 Per ACC: For London Enroute, London Terminal Control and Prestwick 0.00 2019-2020 United Kingdom is part of: 0.00 The UK-Ireland FAB Number of national projects: 8 Number of FAB projects: 1 Number of multinational projects: 9 Summary of 2020 developments: Due to the Covid-19 pandemic most projects were paused or postponed and there was no completion of any objectives for 2020. The United Kingdom was in the transitional phase of leaving the European Union and there were no major legislative changes during this year. LSSIP Year 2020 United Kingdom 2 Released Issue Progress per SESAR Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the SESAR baseline (Pre-SESAR and SESAR1 non- PCP) and the PCP elements. It shows the average implementation progress for all objectives grouped by SESAR Phases, excluding those for which the State is outside the applicability area as defined on a yearly basis in the European ATM Master Plan (Level 3) 2020, i.e. disregarding the declared “NOT APPLICABLE” LSSIP progress status. The SESAR 1 (non-PCP) progress in the graphics below for this State is based on the following objectives: AOP14, AOP16, AOP18, ATC02.9, ATC18, ATC19, ATC20 and COM11.2. Pre-SESAR Phase 2000 2030 78% SESAR 1 (PCP only) 2011 2025 45% SESAR 1 (non-PCP) 2013 2030 24% LSSIP Year 2020 United Kingdom 3 Released Issue Progress per SESAR Essential Operational Changes and Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Essential Operational Changes, in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentages are calculated as an average, per EOC, of the same objectives as in the previous paragraph. ATM 86 % Interconnected Network 62% Airport and TMA 78 % performance 1 % 32 % CNS 76 % Infrastructure 15 % and Services 28 % Digital AIM and 36 % MET Services Fully Dynamic 54 % and Optimised 0 % Airspace 55 % Multimodal Mobility and N/A integration of all Airspace Users Trajectory Based 100 % Operations 100 % Virtualisation of Service 95 % Provision 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Pre-SESAR Phase SESAR 1 (non-PCP) SESAR 1 (PCP only) LSSIP Year 2020 United Kingdom 4 Released Issue ICAO ASBUs Progress Implementation The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the ICAO ASBUs Blocks. The overall percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant Objectives contributing to each of the relevant ASBUs; this is a summary of the table explained in Chapter 5.3 – ICAO ASBU Implementation Progress. Block 0 2000 2030 71% Block 1 2009 2030 45% Block 2 2013 2030 11% Block 3 2018 2025 6% LSSIP Year 2020 United Kingdom 5 Released Issue ATM Deployment Outlook State Objectives Deployed in 2019 - 2020 None By 2021 By 2022 By 2023 By 2024+ - ASM Management of Real- - New Pan-European - Voice over Internet - Collaborative Flight Time Airspace Data Network Service (NewPENS) Protocol (VoIP) in Planning AOM19.2 - 18 % progress COM12 - 50 % progress Airport/Terminal FCM03 - 85 % progress - Interactive Rolling NOP - Free Route Airspace COM11.2 - 15 % progress - RNP Approach Procedures FCM05 - 78 % progress AOM21.2