Noise and Vibration of Spacecraft Structures Ruido Y Vibración De
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
New Pad Constructed for Smaller Rocket Launches
PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS • JULY 2015 At NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida, the Ground Systems Development and Operations (GSDO) Program Office is leading the center’s transfor- mation from a historically government-only launch complex to a spaceport bustling with activity involving government and commercial vehicles alike. GSDO is tasked with developing and using the complex equipment required to safely handle a variety of rockets and spacecraft during assembly, transport and launch. For more information about GSDO accomplishments happening around the center, visit http://go.nasa.gov/groundsystems. New Pad Constructed for Smaller Rocket Launches NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida took another step forward in its transformation to a 21st century multi-user spaceport with the completion of the new Small Class Vehicle Launch Pad, designated 39C, in the Launch Pad 39B area. This designated pad to test smaller rockets will make it more affordable for smaller aerospace companies to develop and launch from the center, and to break into the commercial spaceflight market. Kennedy Director Bob Cabana and representatives from the Ground Systems Development and Operations (GSDO) Program and the Center Planning and Development (CPD) and Engineering Directorates marked the completion of the new pad during a ribbon-cutting ceremony July 17. NASA Kennedy Space Center Director Bob Cabana, center, helps cut the ribbon on the new Small Class Vehicle Launch Pad, designated 39C, at Kennedy Space Center in Florida. Also helping to cut the ribbon are, from left, Pat Simpkins, director, Engineering and Technology Directorate; Rich Koller, senior vice president of design firm Jones Edmunds; Scott Col- loredo, director, Center Planning and Development; and Michelle Shoultz, president of Frazier Engineering. -
1993 (179Kb Pdf)
February 4, 1993 KSC Contact: Bruce Buckingham KSC Release No. 10-93 Notice To Editors/News Directors: KSC NEWS CENTER OFFICE HOURS FOR PEGASUS ARRIVAL The NASA B-52 aircraft carrying the Orbital Sciences Cor- poration Pegasus rocket is scheduled to arrive at KSC on Sunday, Feb. 7, with launch targeted for Feb. 9. The aircraft is currently scheduled to depart Edwards Air Force Base, Calif., at about 10:00 a.m. EST on Sunday with a single refueling stopover planned at Sheppard AFB, Texas. If weather permits, arrival of the aircraft at KSC's Shuttle Landing Facility should be about 4:30 p.m. EST. Status updates regarding the cross-country flight will be made on KSC's codaphone over the weekend. This can be reached by calling 407/867-2525. Public Affairs officers will be in the KSC Press Site office by 9:30 a.m. Sunday in order to provide status updates by phone. The office, however, will not officially open until it is deter- mined the aircraft will in fact be arriving at KSC. If it is determined that the aircraft will be successful in completing the day-long trip to KSC on Sunday, the office will officially open at 3:00 p.m. In that event, media interested in viewing the B-52/Pegasus arrival should plan on calling the KSC news center at 407/867-2468 for departure times to the Shuttle Landing Facility. News media who do not possess current credentials must con- tact the Public Information Office before close of business Friday, Feb. -
Proposal to Construct and Operate a Satellite Launching Facility on Christmas Island
Environment Assessment Report PROPOSAL TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A SATELLITE LAUNCHING FACILITY ON CHRISTMAS ISLAND Environment Assessment Branch 2 May 2000 Christmas Island Satellite Launch Facility Proposal Environment Assessment Report - Environment Assessment Branch – May 2000 3 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................6 1.1 GENERAL ...........................................................................................................6 1.2 ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT............................................................................7 1.3 THE ASSESSMENT PROCESS ...............................................................................7 1.4 MAJOR ISSUES RAISED DURING THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD ON THE DRAFT EIS .................................................................................................................9 1.4.1 Socio-economic......................................................................................10 1.4.2 Biodiversity............................................................................................10 1.4.3 Roads and infrastructure .....................................................................11 1.4.4 Other.......................................................................................................12 2 NEED FOR THE PROJECT AND KEY ALTERNATIVES ......................14 2.1 NEED FOR THE PROJECT ..................................................................................14 2.2 KEY -
Low Power Energy Harvesting and Storage Techniques from Ambient Human Powered Energy Sources
University of Northern Iowa UNI ScholarWorks Dissertations and Theses @ UNI Student Work 2008 Low power energy harvesting and storage techniques from ambient human powered energy sources Faruk Yildiz University of Northern Iowa Copyright ©2008 Faruk Yildiz Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/etd Part of the Power and Energy Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Recommended Citation Yildiz, Faruk, "Low power energy harvesting and storage techniques from ambient human powered energy sources" (2008). Dissertations and Theses @ UNI. 500. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/etd/500 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses @ UNI by an authorized administrator of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LOW POWER ENERGY HARVESTING AND STORAGE TECHNIQUES FROM AMBIENT HUMAN POWERED ENERGY SOURCES. A Dissertation Submitted In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Industrial Technology Approved: Dr. Mohammed Fahmy, Chair Dr. Recayi Pecen, Co-Chair Dr. Sue A Joseph, Committee Member Dr. John T. Fecik, Committee Member Dr. Andrew R Gilpin, Committee Member Dr. Ayhan Zora, Committee Member Faruk Yildiz University of Northern Iowa August 2008 UMI Number: 3321009 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. -
View / Download
www.arianespace.com www.starsem.com www.avio Arianespace’s eighth launch of 2021 with the fifth Soyuz of the year will place its satellite passengers into low Earth orbit. The launcher will be carrying a total payload of approximately 5 518 kg. The launch will be performed from Baikonur, in Kazakhstan. MISSION DESCRIPTION 2 ONEWEB SATELLITES 3 Liftoff is planned on at exactly: SOYUZ LAUNCHER 4 06:23 p.m. Washington, D.C. time, 10:23 p.m. Universal time (UTC), LAUNCH CAMPAIGN 4 00:23 a.m. Paris time, FLIGHT SEQUENCES 5 01:23 a.m. Moscow time, 03:23 a.m. Baikonur Cosmodrome. STAKEHOLDERS OF A LAUNCH 6 The nominal duration of the mission (from liftoff to separation of the satellites) is: 3 hours and 45 minutes. Satellites: OneWeb satellite #255 to #288 Customer: OneWeb • Altitude at separation: 450 km Cyrielle BOUJU • Inclination: 84.7degrees [email protected] +33 (0)6 32 65 97 48 RUAG Space AB (Linköping, Sweden) is the prime contractor in charge of development and production of the dispenser system used on Flight ST34. It will carry the satellites during their flight to low Earth orbit and then release them into space. The dedicated dispenser is designed to Flight ST34, the 29th commercial mission from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan performed by accommodate up to 36 spacecraft per launch, allowing Arianespace and its Starsem affiliate, will put 34 of OneWeb’s satellites bringing the total fleet to 288 satellites Arianespace to timely deliver the lion’s share of the initial into a near-polar orbit at an altitude of 450 kilometers. -
Evaluation of Electric Energy Generation from Sound Energy Using Piezoelectric Actuator
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064 Index Copernicus Value (2013): 6.14 | Impact Factor (2014): 5.611 Evaluation of Electric Energy Generation from Sound Energy Using Piezoelectric Actuator Mohana Faroug Saeed Attia1, Afraa Ibraheim Mohmmed Abdalateef2 1Department of Physics, University of Dongola, Sudan 2Collaborator Instructor University of Khartoum, Sudan Abstract: This paper presents the work done on the conversion techniques and methodologies of converting sound energy to its electrical counterpart, and focuses on the future of this type of energy sources than wind energy, solar energy, and biogas. Also, it includes the increase in energy consumption due to ever growing number of electronic devices, and the harvesting energy from humans and using of piezoelectricity. In the experimental work, a piezoelectric generator lead zirconate titante (PZT actuator) is used to extract sound energy from the loudspeaker from various distances and then to convert this energy into electrical energy. The maximum voltage generated by the piezoelectric generator occurs when its resonant frequency is operating near the frequency of sound. The result shows that the maximum output voltage of 28.8 mVrms was obtained with the sound intensity of 80.5 dB resonant frequency of 65 Hz at 1 cm distance in the first mode. In the second mode, the maximum output voltage of 94 m Vrms was obtained with the sound intensity of 105.7 dB at resonant frequency of 378 Hz at 1 cm which is larger than that of the first mode. However, for both modes, voltage decreases as distance increases. Keywords: piezoelectric effect, sound energy, piezoelectric material, resonant frequency, PZT actuator, electricity 1. -
7. Operations
7. Operations 7.1 Ground Operations The Exploration Systems Architecture Study (ESAS) team addressed the launch site integra- tion of the exploration systems. The team was fortunate to draw on expertise from members with historical and contemporary human space flight program experience including the Mercury, Gemini, Apollo, Skylab, Apollo Soyuz Test Project, Shuttle, and International Space Station (ISS) programs, as well as from members with ground operations experience reaching back to the Redstone, Jupiter, Pershing, and Titan launch vehicle programs. The team had a wealth of experience in both management and technical responsibilities and was able to draw on recent ground system concepts and other engineering products from the Orbital Space Plane (OSP) and Space Launch Initiative (SLI) programs, diverse X-vehicle projects, and leadership in NASA/Industry/Academia groups such as the Space Propulsion Synergy Team (SPST) and the Advanced Spaceport Technology Working Group (ASTWG). 7.1.1 Ground Operations Summary The physical and functional integration of the proposed exploration architecture elements will occur at the primary launch site at the NASA Kennedy Space Center (KSC). In order to support the ESAS recommendation of the use of a Shuttle-derived Cargo Launch Vehicle (CaLV) and a separate Crew Launch Vehicle (CLV) for lunar missions and the use of a CLV for ISS missions, KSC’s Launch Complex 39 facilities and ground equipment were selected for conversion. Ground-up replacement of the pads, assembly, refurbishment, and/or process- ing facilities was determined to be too costly and time-consuming to design, build, outfit, activate, and certify in a timely manner to support initial test flights leading to an operational CEV/CLV system by 2011. -
Energy Efficiency As a Low-Cost Resource for Achieving Carbon Emissions Reductions
Energy Effi ciency as a Low-Cost Resource for Achieving Carbon Emissions Reductions A RESOURCE OF THE NATIONAL ACTION PLAN FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY SEPTEMBER 2009 About This Document This paper, Energy Effi ciency as a Low-Cost Resource for Achieving Carbon Emissions Reductions, is provided to assist utility regulators, gas and electric utilities, and others in meeting the National Action Plan for Energy Effi ciency’s goal of achieving all cost-effective energy effi ciency by 2025. This paper summarizes the scale and economic value of energy effi - ciency for reducing carbon emissions and discusses the barriers to achieving the potential for cost-effective energy effi ciency. It also reviews current regional, state, and local approaches for including energy effi ciency in climate policy, using these approaches to inform a set of recommendations for leveraging energy effi ciency within state climate policy. The paper does not capture federal climate policy options or recommendations, discussion of tradable energy effi ciency credits, or emissions impacts of specifi c energy effi ciency measures or programs. The intended audience for the paper is any stakeholder interested in learning more about how to advance energy effi ciency as a low-cost resource to reduce carbon emissions. All stakeholders, including state policy-makers, public utility commissions, city councils, and utilities, can use this paper to understand the key issues and terminology, as well as the approaches that are being used to reduce carbon emissions by advancing energy effi ciency policies and programs. Energy Efficiency as a Low-Cost Resource for Achieving Carbon Emissions Reductions A RESOURCE OF THE NATIONAL ACTION PLAN FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY SEPTEMBER 2009 The Leadership Group of the National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency is committed to taking action to increase investment in cost-effective energy efficiency. -
Launching Orion Into Space
National Aeronautics and Space Administration LAUNCHING ORION INTO SPACE LAUNCHING ORION 27,000 MPH Speed to propel into Space to Deep Space Learn about the tremendous effort put forth by thousands of people across the country to launch Orion into orbit, and the challenges that will be faced as Orion 17,500 MPH is prepared for flight. Orion separating from the launch vehicle Orion has been designed Flight tests are difficult and There are thousands of Separation events that are with the minimal mass and complex but are necessary for steps that must be carried critical during Orion’s first few maximum capability needed engineers to gain confidence out sequentially – or even minutes of spaceflight are very to safely transport everything that the systems critical to simultaneously – and function dynamic, requiring the close needed for four crew crew safety will work during in perfect harmony for a attention of the entire members to live and work in space flight. seamless launch. flight team. space for up to 21 days. E SPAC N OF ITIO FIN ES) DE MIL THE JOURNEY TO THE LAUNCH PAD LAUNCHING ORION (62 DESIGNING ORION PUTTING ORION SENDING ORION THROUGH PUSHING ORION TO THE TEST THE ATMOSPHERE INTO DEEP SPACE Orion accelerating through Earth’s atmosphere Orion on the launch pad O MPH at NASA’s multi-purpose AN ENGINEER’S MAGNUM OPUS RIGOROUS TESTING PRIOR TO FLIGHT OVERCOMING EARTH’S GRAVITY ACHIEVING SUCCESS spaceport in Florida www.nasa.gov Challenges of Spaceflight: Putting Orion to the Test Spaceflight Stage Fright Launching Orion into Space The Orion spacecraft is comprised of the crew module, On Orion’s way to orbit, there are a series of events where astronauts will live and work during the mission; that must occur to separate the spacecraft from the Orion is America’s next-generation spacecraft. -
Spaceport Infrastructure Cost Trends
AIAA 2014-4397 SPACE Conferences & Exposition 4-7 August 2014, San Diego, CA AIAA SPACE 2014 Conference and Exposition Spaceport Infrastructure Cost Trends Brian S. Gulliver, PE1, and G. Wayne Finger, PhD, PE2 RS&H, Inc. The total cost of employing a new or revised space launch system is critical to understanding its business potential, analyzing its business case and funding its development. The design, construction and activation of a commercial launch complex or spaceport can represent a significant portion of the non-recurring costs for a new launch system. While the historical cost trends for traditional launch site infrastructure are fairly well understood, significant changes in the approach to commercial launch systems in recent years have required a reevaluation of the cost of ground infrastructure. By understanding the factors which drive these costs, informed decisions can be made early in a program to give the business case the best chance of economic success. The authors have designed several NASA, military, commercial and private launch complexes and supported the evaluation and licensing of commercial aerospaceports. Data from these designs has been used to identify the major factors which, on a broad scale, drive their non-recurring costs. Both vehicle specific and location specific factors play major roles in establishing costs. I. Introduction It is critical for launch vehicle operators and other stakeholders to understand the factors and trends that affect the non-recurring costs of launch site infrastructure. These costs are often an area of concern when planning for the development of a new launch vehicle program as they can represent a significant capital investment that must be recovered over the lifecycle of the program. -
Commercial Spaceports: a New Frontier of Infrastructure Law
Copyright © 2020 Environmental Law Institute®, Washington, DC. Reprinted with permission from ELR®, http://www.eli.org, 1-800-433-5120. COMMENTS COMMErcIAL SPACEPORTS: A NEW FRONTIER OF INfrASTRUCTURE LAW by Kathryn Kusske Floyd and Tyler G. Welti Kathryn Kusske Floyd and Tyler G. Welti are infrastructure lawyers advising commercial space developers as part of Venable LLP’s commercial space legal and policy practice. hile a “spaceport” may sound like a concept fies several considerations associated with the new frontier of mostly confined to science fiction, several commercial space transportation infrastructure projects. commercial spaceports are in operation in the WUnited States and abroad, and more are being developed. I. The Commercial Space Industry As the name suggests, spaceports, or commercial space launch sites, are used to conduct launch and reentry opera- tions to and from space, such as launching satellites into A. The Space Economy orbit or sending space tourists to the edge of space and back. A commercial space launch site can be operated by The burgeoning commercial space industry comprises a nonfederal entity, such as a business, state or local gov- private ventures, public ventures, and public-private part- ernment, or public-private partnership, and offers its infra- nerships. Launch operations can be solely commercial or structure and related services to private space companies can provide services pursuant to government contracts or federal agencies seeking to conduct launch operations. with civil and/or defense agencies. Currently, the industry Operating a commercial space launch site in the United includes the following commercial activities: States requires a launch site operator license (LSOL) issued by the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA’s) Office of Com- • Orbital launches to place satellites and other payloads mercial Space Transportation (AST). -
2018 Energy Efficiency Cost-Effectiveness Ratios
2018 Annual Report of Energy Conservation Accomplishments April 1, 2019 PSE obtained permission to use all photos and likenesses within this Report. Energy Efficiency Doc# EES0012019 Report Contents Table of Contents I. Executive Summary ................................................................................................. 1 Puget Sound Energy’s Annual Report of 2018 Conservation Accomplishments ................ 1 II. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 13 Key Portfolio Results .......................................................................................................... 13 Conservation Savings ........................................................................................................ 14 Expenditures ...................................................................................................................... 19 2018-2018 Biennial Target Progress ................................................................................. 21 Five–Year Trends ............................................................................................................... 22 Cost-Effectiveness Ratios .................................................................................................. 24 Direct Benefit to Customer as a Percent of Energy Efficiency Expenditures .................... 25 Energy Efficiency’s Customer Focus ................................................................................. 27 Measures