DOCSLIB.ORG

2017 Greenhouse Gas Inventory Tables and Figures

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2017 Greenhouse Gas Inventory Tables and Figures 2017 Greenhouse Inventory June 2018 Prepared by: Puget Sound Energy Prepared by: Puget Sound Energy 2017 Greenhouse Inventory TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................. 4 1.1 Purpose ........................................................................................... 4 1.2 Inventory Organization .................................................................... 4 2.0 BACKGROUND .............................................................................. 5 2.1 Regulatory Actions .......................................................................... 5 2.2 Inventory and GHG Reporting Compliance ..................................... 6 3.0 MAJOR ACCOUNTING ISSUES .................................................... 7 4.0 BOUNDARIES AND SOURCES ..................................................... 8 4.1 Organizational Boundaries .............................................................. 8 4.1.1 Electrical Operations .............................................................................................. 8 4.1.2 Natural Gas Operations ......................................................................................... 8 4.2 Operational Boundaries .................................................................. 9 4.2.1 Scope I (Direct Emissions) ..................................................................................... 9 4.2.2 Scope II (Indirect Emissions from Electric Power) ............................................... 11 4.2.3 Scope III (Other Indirect Emissions) .................................................................... 11 5.0 METHODOLOGY .......................................................................... 12 5.1 Scope I .......................................................................................... 12 5.1.1 Electric Operations ............................................................................................... 12 5.1.2 Natural Gas Operations ....................................................................................... 12 5.1.3 Other Scope I Emissions ..................................................................................... 12 5.2 Scope II (Indirect Emissions Associated With the Purchase of Electricity) 12 1 Prepared by: Puget Sound Energy 5.3 Scope III (Other Indirect Emissions) Electric Operations .............. 12 5.3.1 Electric Operations ............................................................................................... 12 5.3.2 Natural Gas Supply .............................................................................................. 13 6.0 GHG EMISSIONS ......................................................................... 14 7.0 Sources and Uncertainties of GHG Emissions .............................. 15 7.1 Sources of GHG Emissions .......................................................... 15 7.2 Uncertainties in the GHG Emissions Inventory ............................. 16 7.2.1 Potential Sources of GHG Emissions Not Included ............................................. 16 7.2.2 Uncertainty Associated with Data Sources and Methodology ............................. 17 8.0 GHG EMISSIONS TIME TRENDS ................................................ 18 8.1 Changes in Organizational Boundaries ......................................... 18 8.2 Changes in Emissions – 2017 v. 2016 .......................................... 18 8.3 Changes in Methodology .............................................................. 19 8.3.1 All Emissions ........................................................................................................ 19 8.3.2 Scope I (Direct Emissions) ................................................................................... 19 8.3.3 Scope III (Other Indirect Emissions) .................................................................... 21 9.0 CONSERVATION PROGRAMS AND GHG EMISSIONS AVOIDED 23 10.0 REFERENCES.............................................................................. 24 2 Prepared by: Puget Sound Energy EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Puget Sound Energy’s (PSE) operating rates and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for calendar year 2017 are summarized in Table ES-1, Table ES-2, and Table ES-3. The emission percentages indicated in Table ES-2 are the percentage of the total emissions of the particular pollutant within each scope. The emission percentages indicated in Table ES-3 are the percentage of the total emissions of the particular pollutant among all sources. A majority of the carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions were from generated and purchased electricity (65.7%), while the remaining emissions were from natural gas supply to end-users (34.3%). For methane (CH4), the majority of emissions were fugitive from natural gas operations (80.9%). Generated and purchased electricity also accounted for all nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions and all sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) emissions. Compared to 2016, total electricity delivered to customers in 2017 was down by 7.6%, and total emissions were down by 0.3%. This trend is largely due to PSE dispatching less of its owned generation (coal, gas and renewable) with more purchased energy being delivered into PSE’s system under firm contract, but less from the spot market. In addition, emissions from PSE’s owned generating sources were down in 2017 for several reasons including: marginally less dispatch of PSE’s coal-based Colstrip Generating Station (emissions down 3.4%); more deliveries from firm contracted resources (emission up 29.5%); less PSE gas generation (emissions down 7.6%); and less deliveries of purchased unspecified energy (emissions down 22.7%). The “direct use” of natural gas often includes heating for water, buildings, and industrial processes, as well as use as a raw material to produce petrochemicals, plastics, paints, and a wide variety of other products. The emissions associated with the “direct use” of natural gas by end-users together with the emissions associated with power generation and power deliveries from natural gas combustion (direct and indirect) are accounted for in this inventory. 3 Prepared by: Puget Sound Energy 1.0 INTRODUCTION This document presents an inventory of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from Puget Sound Energy (PSE) operations during the calendar year 2017. PSE’s primary business is electric generation, purchase, distribution, and sales and natural gas purchase, distribution, and sales. This inventory accounts for the four major GHGs most relevant to PSE’s businesses. They are carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). GHG emissions were calculated in accordance with a standardized nationally accepted protocol. 1.1 Purpose This inventory is intended to provide PSE with the information to achieve five major goals: Maintaining an accurate and transparent estimate of GHG emissions; Analyzing PSE’s GHG emission sources in relation to size and impact; Tracking PSE’s GHG emissions over time; Evaluating PSE’s GHG emissions from electric production and purchase relative to those of other electric generators and electric utilities; and Estimating the emissions avoided through PSE’s conservation programs. 1.2 Inventory Organization This inventory is organized into 9 sections. The introduction explains the purpose and organization of this inventory. The background of PSE’s GHG inventory is described in Section 2.0. Major accounting issues within PSE’s GHG inventory are discussed in Section 3.0. Section 4.0 presents the choice of organizational and operational boundaries used in the inventory. Section 5.0 documents the calculation methodology, data sources, and assumptions made to estimate PSE’s GHG emissions. Section 6.0 provides a list of tables used to present and analyze PSE’s GHG emissions during calendar year 2016. Section 7.0 provides an evaluation of the sources of PSE’s GHG emissions and discusses potential uncertainties in the inventory. Section 8.0 describes changes in PSE’s GHG inventory over time. Section 9.0 presents PSE’s conservation programs that are relevant to the inventory and the estimated amount of GHG emissions avoided as a result of these conservation programs. The last section contains a list of references used to compile this inventory. 4 Prepared by: Puget Sound Energy 2.0 BACKGROUND From 2002 to 2010, PSE’s GHG inventories have followed a widely-accepted international GHG accounting protocol, the Greenhouse Gas Protocol (WRI/WBCSD 2004). The Greenhouse Gas Protocol (GHG Protocol) was developed by a consortium of businesses, business organizations, governments, and non-governmental organizations led jointly by the World Resources Institute (WRI) and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). The WRI/WBCSD GHG Protocol has set the standard for development of GHG accounting methods for many industries and state GHG programs. Under the GHG Protocol, six groups of GHGs are tracked: CO2, CH4, N2O, SF6, hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), and perfluorocarbons (PFCs). Two of the groups of gases, HFCs and PFCs, are not tracked quantitatively in this inventory because PSE’s emissions of these GHGs are negligible. 2.1 Regulatory Actions This inventory continues to incorporate many of the standards developed by the WRI/WBSCD. However, regulatory actions taken at the federal and state levels now require PSE to disclose its emissions using
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Middle East Oil Pricing Systems in Flux Introduction
    May 2021: ISSUE 128 MIDDLE EAST OIL PRICING SYSTEMS IN FLUX INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................................ 2 THE GULF/ASIA BENCHMARKS: SETTING THE SCENE...................................................................................................... 5 Adi Imsirovic THE SHIFT IN CRUDE AND PRODUCT FLOWS ..................................................................................................................... 8 Reid l'Anson and Kevin Wright THE DUBAI BENCHMARK: EVOLUTION AND RESILIENCE ............................................................................................... 12 Dave Ernsberger MIDDLE EAST AND ASIA OIL PRICING—BENCHMARKS AND TRADING OPPORTUNITIES......................................... 15 Paul Young THE PROSPECTS OF MURBAN AS A BENCHMARK .......................................................................................................... 18 Michael Wittner IFAD: A LURCHING START IN A SANDY ROAD .................................................................................................................. 22 Jorge Montepeque THE SECOND SPLIT: BASRAH MEDIUM AND THE CHALLENGE OF IRAQI CRUDE QUALITY...................................... 29 Ahmed Mehdi CHINA’S SHANGHAI INE CRUDE FUTURES: HAPPY ACCIDENT VERSUS OVERDESIGN ............................................. 33 Tom Reed FUJAIRAH’S RISE TO PROMINENCE ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vitol-Brochure-2019 FINAL-1.Pdf
    02 VITOL | Contents Vitol 04 VLC Renewables 14 Vitol at a glance 05 Our investments 16 Operating Globally 08 VTTI 17 Trading portfolio 10 Vitol Aviation 17 Crude oil 10 Viva Energy 18 Middle distillates 10 Vivo Energy 18 Gasoline 10 Petrol Ofisi 19 Biofuel 11 OVH Energy 19 Fuel oil 11 VARO 20 Naphtha 12 Rodoil 20 Bitumen 12 Hascol 20 Coal 13 Cockett Marine Oil 20 Liquid petroleum gas (LPG) 13 VPI Immingham 21 Liquefied natural gas (LNG) 13 VLC Renewables 21 Natural gas 13 Exploration and production 24 Power 14 Vitol Foundation 25 Renewables 14 Our worldwide capabilities 26 Shipping 14 VITOL VITOL | 03 Vitol Vitol is at the For over 50 years Vitol has served the Responsibility heart of the world’s world’s energy markets, trading over We are mindful of the risks associated seven million barrels of crude oil and with handling energy. Our assets energy flows. Every products a day and delivering energy operate to international HSE standards day we use our products to countries worldwide. and we expect the same of our partners expertise and throughout the energy chain. We seek logistical networks Our customers include national oil to conduct our business in line with to distribute energy companies, multinationals, leading the ten principles of the UN Global industrial and chemical companies and Compact and to work with partners around the world, the world’s largest airlines. We deliver who share our commitment to high efficiently and the products they need on time and to standards of operation. responsibly. specification by sourcing and managing the movement of energy through the relevant infrastructures.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate-Brochure 2020.Pdf
    02 VITOL | Contents Vitol 04 VLC Renewables 14 Vitol at a glance 05 Our investments 16 Operating Globally 08 VTTI 17 Trading portfolio 10 Vitol Aviation 17 Crude oil 10 Viva Energy 18 Middle distillates 10 Vivo Energy 18 Gasoline 10 Petrol Ofisi 19 Biofuel 11 OVH Energy 19 Fuel oil 11 VARO 20 Naphtha 12 Rodoil 20 Bitumen 12 Hascol 20 Coal 13 Cockett Marine Oil 20 Liquid petroleum gas (LPG) 13 VPI Immingham 21 Liquefied natural gas (LNG) 13 VLC Renewables 21 Natural gas 13 Exploration and production 24 Power 14 Vitol Foundation 25 Renewables 14 Our worldwide capabilities 26 Shipping 14 VITOL VITOL | 03 Vitol Vitol is at the For over 50 years Vitol has served the Responsibility world’s energy markets, trading over We are mindful of the risks associated heart of the world’s eight million barrels of crude oil and with handling energy. Our assets energy flows. Every products a day and delivering energy operate to international HSE standards day we use our products to countries worldwide. and we expect the same of our partners expertise and throughout the energy chain. We seek logistical networks Our customers include national oil to conduct our business in line with to distribute energy companies, multinationals, leading the ten principles of the UN Global industrial and chemical companies and Compact and to work with partners around the world, the world’s largest airlines. We deliver who share our commitment to high efficiently and the products they need on time and to standards of operation. responsibly. specification by sourcing and managing the movement of energy through the relevant infrastructures.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil and Gas News Briefs, December 3, 2018
    Oil and Gas News Briefs Compiled by Larry Persily December 3, 2018 First Nation approves benefits agreements for LNG project in B.C. (Vancouver Sun; Nov. 29) - It wasn’t an easy decision for the Squamish First Nation to approve the C$1.6 billion Woodfibre LNG project 35 miles north of Vancouver, B.C., according to a spokesman, but it came with potential benefits of cash and land. The First Nation council approved three economic benefits agreements last week — one each with Woodfibre LNG, pipeline company FortisBC and the province, “contingent on the environmental conditions being met,” according to a news release Nov. 29. The 40-year agreements include cash totaling C$225.65 million, 1,600 short-term and 330 long-term jobs, business opportunities, and land transfers of almost 1,100 acres. “Communities are sometimes faced with difficult decisions and it is recognized that this was a difficult decision for many,” said Squamish Councillor Khelsilem, whose English name is Dustin Rivers. “As agreed by the proponents, we will be co-developing management plans for the project and will have our own monitors on the ground to report on any non-compliance with cultural, employment, and training conditions.” Work is expected to start next fall at the former pulp mill site. At full operation, the plant will be capable of making 2.1 million tonnes of LNG per year. The money will be paid to the First Nation at project milestones, including the start of construction and start of operations. Other payments will go toward a cultural fund for the Indigenous community and training and education programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Power Energy Harvesting and Storage Techniques from Ambient Human Powered Energy Sources
    University of Northern Iowa UNI ScholarWorks Dissertations and Theses @ UNI Student Work 2008 Low power energy harvesting and storage techniques from ambient human powered energy sources Faruk Yildiz University of Northern Iowa Copyright ©2008 Faruk Yildiz Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/etd Part of the Power and Energy Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Recommended Citation Yildiz, Faruk, "Low power energy harvesting and storage techniques from ambient human powered energy sources" (2008). Dissertations and Theses @ UNI. 500. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/etd/500 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses @ UNI by an authorized administrator of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LOW POWER ENERGY HARVESTING AND STORAGE TECHNIQUES FROM AMBIENT HUMAN POWERED ENERGY SOURCES. A Dissertation Submitted In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Industrial Technology Approved: Dr. Mohammed Fahmy, Chair Dr. Recayi Pecen, Co-Chair Dr. Sue A Joseph, Committee Member Dr. John T. Fecik, Committee Member Dr. Andrew R Gilpin, Committee Member Dr. Ayhan Zora, Committee Member Faruk Yildiz University of Northern Iowa August 2008 UMI Number: 3321009 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Vitol Pays $164 Mln to Resolve U.S. Allegations of Oil Bribes in Latin
    December 4, 2020 Vitol pays $164 mln to resolve U.S. allegations of according to the DOJ statement. oil bribes in Latin America Prosecutors said the bribes went to employees at Mexico's Vitol Group's U.S. subsidiary agreed to pay $164 state-run Pemex and Ecuadorian state oil company million to resolve probes by the U.S. government that Petroecuador. the energy trader paid bribes in Brazil and other Petroecuador and Pemex did not respond to requests for countries to boost its oil trading business, the U.S. comment. Department of Justice said on Thursday. Brazilian prosecutors announced in late 2018 that they Under a three-year deferred prosecution agreement, were investigating Petrobras' oil deals with trading houses, the Swiss trading firm admitted guilt and agreed to including the world's biggest oil traders - Vitol, Trafigura improve internal reporting and compliance functions. and Glencore. Vitol, run out of London, is the world's largest In early 2019, the DOJ opened its own probe into the three independent oil trader, trading some 8 million barrels company's dealings in Brazil. The FBI investigated two key of oil a day. Vitol executives who were overseeing the region during "Vitol paid bribes to government officials in Brazil, those years, including the head of Vitol's U.S. arm, Michael Ecuador and Mexico to win lucrative business "Mike" Loya, who retired earlier this year. contracts and obtain competitive advantages to which Loya did not immediately respond to a message sent to his they were not fairly entitled," Acting U.S. Attorney LinkedIn account.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Electric Energy Generation from Sound Energy Using Piezoelectric Actuator
    International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064 Index Copernicus Value (2013): 6.14 | Impact Factor (2014): 5.611 Evaluation of Electric Energy Generation from Sound Energy Using Piezoelectric Actuator Mohana Faroug Saeed Attia1, Afraa Ibraheim Mohmmed Abdalateef2 1Department of Physics, University of Dongola, Sudan 2Collaborator Instructor University of Khartoum, Sudan Abstract: This paper presents the work done on the conversion techniques and methodologies of converting sound energy to its electrical counterpart, and focuses on the future of this type of energy sources than wind energy, solar energy, and biogas. Also, it includes the increase in energy consumption due to ever growing number of electronic devices, and the harvesting energy from humans and using of piezoelectricity. In the experimental work, a piezoelectric generator lead zirconate titante (PZT actuator) is used to extract sound energy from the loudspeaker from various distances and then to convert this energy into electrical energy. The maximum voltage generated by the piezoelectric generator occurs when its resonant frequency is operating near the frequency of sound. The result shows that the maximum output voltage of 28.8 mVrms was obtained with the sound intensity of 80.5 dB resonant frequency of 65 Hz at 1 cm distance in the first mode. In the second mode, the maximum output voltage of 94 m Vrms was obtained with the sound intensity of 105.7 dB at resonant frequency of 378 Hz at 1 cm which is larger than that of the first mode. However, for both modes, voltage decreases as distance increases. Keywords: piezoelectric effect, sound energy, piezoelectric material, resonant frequency, PZT actuator, electricity 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Efficiency As a Low-Cost Resource for Achieving Carbon Emissions Reductions
    Energy Effi ciency as a Low-Cost Resource for Achieving Carbon Emissions Reductions A RESOURCE OF THE NATIONAL ACTION PLAN FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY SEPTEMBER 2009 About This Document This paper, Energy Effi ciency as a Low-Cost Resource for Achieving Carbon Emissions Reductions, is provided to assist utility regulators, gas and electric utilities, and others in meeting the National Action Plan for Energy Effi ciency’s goal of achieving all cost-effective energy effi ciency by 2025. This paper summarizes the scale and economic value of energy effi - ciency for reducing carbon emissions and discusses the barriers to achieving the potential for cost-effective energy effi ciency. It also reviews current regional, state, and local approaches for including energy effi ciency in climate policy, using these approaches to inform a set of recommendations for leveraging energy effi ciency within state climate policy. The paper does not capture federal climate policy options or recommendations, discussion of tradable energy effi ciency credits, or emissions impacts of specifi c energy effi ciency measures or programs. The intended audience for the paper is any stakeholder interested in learning more about how to advance energy effi ciency as a low-cost resource to reduce carbon emissions. All stakeholders, including state policy-makers, public utility commissions, city councils, and utilities, can use this paper to understand the key issues and terminology, as well as the approaches that are being used to reduce carbon emissions by advancing energy effi ciency policies and programs. Energy Efficiency as a Low-Cost Resource for Achieving Carbon Emissions Reductions A RESOURCE OF THE NATIONAL ACTION PLAN FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY SEPTEMBER 2009 The Leadership Group of the National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency is committed to taking action to increase investment in cost-effective energy efficiency.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Energy Efficiency Cost-Effectiveness Ratios
    2018 Annual Report of Energy Conservation Accomplishments April 1, 2019 PSE obtained permission to use all photos and likenesses within this Report. Energy Efficiency Doc# EES0012019 Report Contents Table of Contents I. Executive Summary ................................................................................................. 1 Puget Sound Energy’s Annual Report of 2018 Conservation Accomplishments ................ 1 II. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 13 Key Portfolio Results .......................................................................................................... 13 Conservation Savings ........................................................................................................ 14 Expenditures ...................................................................................................................... 19 2018-2018 Biennial Target Progress ................................................................................. 21 Five–Year Trends ............................................................................................................... 22 Cost-Effectiveness Ratios .................................................................................................. 24 Direct Benefit to Customer as a Percent of Energy Efficiency Expenditures .................... 25 Energy Efficiency’s Customer Focus ................................................................................. 27 Measures
    [Show full text]
  • The 7 Forms of Energy Directions: Read and Highlight the Following Information
    The 7 Forms of Energy Directions: Read and highlight the following information. Electricity So now we have the total transformation for coal‐generated electricity. Working backwards from the generator through the turbine into the steam stopping at burning coal, we have 4 different energies that are used along the electricity generating process. Chemical Energy In Ohio, eletricity begins with burning coal. Burning coal releases chemical energy. Chemical energy is the energy given off during a chemical change. During chemical changes atoms rearrange creating new molecules and compounds. When they rearrange, they give off energy. Even just burning something as we do with coal is enough to cause the atoms to rearrange and release chemical energy. When a chemical change occurs, there are a variety of signs that help identify when the change is occurring. Indicators such as gas formation, light generation, heat creation, formation of a precipitate, permanent color change, and odor are all signs that a chemical change has occurred. When one of the signs is present during a change, chemical energy is released. The reason we use coal, oil, and natural gas is because when burned, the chemical energy released gives off lots of thermal energy (and some other energy as well). Thermal Energy When coal is burned, a chemical change occurs. We know this because coal gives off lots of thermal energy (heat). It also displays all of the signs of a chemical change (gas, light, heat, precipitate, color, and odor). In order to capture the thermal energy in a more useable form, power plants heat water.
    [Show full text]
  • Power Generation Using Noise Pollution
    International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 07 Issue: 05 | May 2020 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 POWER GENERATION USING NOISE POLLUTION Dhananjay Shendre1, Ishwar Mohan2, Snehal Shingade3, Krutika Thakare4 1-4Student, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, JSPM’s Jaywantrao Sawant College of Engineering, Pune, Maharashtra, India ---------------------------------------------------------------------***---------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract – Electricity is one of the most important blessing reach to the speakers and then converted back to sound. The that science has given to the mankind. It has also become a electrical current generated by a micro-phone is very small part of modern life and one cannot think of a world without it. and referred to as MIC-level; this signal is typically measured The use of electricity is increasing day by day while the in mill volts. Before it can be used for any-thing serious the resources needs for production are limited and reducing signal needs to be amplified, usually to line level (typically drastically. It became necessary to find an alternate sources 0.5 -2V). Application of sound energy as the source of for production of electricity. electricity can be much beneficial for the human existence as compared to other sources. This is because the sound is In this project we are trying to research and implement one present in the environment as a noise which forms an the solution that is noise pollution. Noise is defined as essential part of the environmental pollution. unwanted sound but sound consists of vibrations and pressure. Vibrations refers the oscillating movement. Sound energy is a mechanical energy which travel in the form of wave, mechanical wave that is an oscillation of Our methodology is based on the oscillations created by the pressure which need medium to travel i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • The Endgame for Commodity Traders Why Only the Biggest and Digitally Advanced Traders Will Thrive
    THE ENDGAME FOR COMMODITY TRADERS WHY ONLY THE BIGGEST AND DIGITALLY ADVANCED TRADERS WILL THRIVE Alexander Franke • Roland Rechtsteiner • Graham Sharp he commodity trading industry is a critical mass in one or more commodities confronting a new, less profitable reality. and the rest of the pack is widening. Within TAfter flatlining for several years, the a few years, the industry will have a different industry’s gross margins in 2016 dipped 4.5 profile – one that is even more dominated by percent to $42 billion, our research shows. the biggest players. (See Exhibit 1.) This decline is setting off a torrent of deal-making and speculation that is transforming the face of commodity WHY BIG MATTERS trading – with examples like Hong Kong-based Noble Group selling part of its business to the The beginning of the endgame started last global energy trader, Vitol; oil trader Gunvor in year with the decline in margins and took off talks with potential acquirers; and Swiss trading in earnest in 2017, as we predicted in our 2016 giant Glencore circling US grain trader Bunge. report, “Reimagining Commodity Trading.” As companies tried to adjust to the industry’s The industry’s endgame has started. From new economics, the clear edge for larger oil to agriculture, building scale is proving operations started to become evident. It didn’t to be the key competitive advantage for the matter if commodity traders had sprawling future. The largest trading companies – both global businesses diversified across various diversified firms and those concentrating commodities or if they specialized in one or two.
    [Show full text]