Constitutionality of Anti Terror Laws in India

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Constitutionality of Anti Terror Laws in India INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH & ANALYSIS (ISSN 2582 – 6433) VOLUME 2 ISSUE 2 (June 2021) Email – [email protected] Website – www.ijlra.com 56565656565651 1 www.ijlra.com Volume 2 Issue 2| June 2021 ISSN: 2582-6433 DISCLAIMER No part of this publication may be reproduced or copied in any form by any means without prior written permission of Managing Editor of IJLRA. The views expressed in this publication are purely personal opinions of the authors and do not reflect the views of the Editorial Team of IJLRA. Though every effort has been made to ensure that the information in Volume I Issue X is accurate and appropriately cited/referenced, neither the Editorial Board nor IJLRA shall be held liable or responsible in any manner whatsever for any consequences for any action taken by anyone on the basis of information in the Journal. Copyright © International Journal for Legal Research & Analysis 1 www.ijlra.com Volume 2 Issue 2| June 2021 ISSN: 2582-6433 EDITORIAL TEAM EDITORS Ms. Ezhiloviya S.P. Nalsar Passout Ms. Priya Singh West Bengal National University of Juridical Science Mr. Ritesh Kumar Nalsar Passout Mrs. Pooja Kothari Practicing Advocate Dr. Shweta Dhand Assistant Professor 2 www.ijlra.com Volume 2 Issue 2 | June 2021 ISSN: 2582-6433 ABOUT US INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH & ANLAYSIS ISSN 2582-6433 is an Online Journal is Quarterly, Peer Review, Academic Journal, Published online, that seeks to provide an interactive platform for the publication of Short Articles, Long Articles, Book Review, Case Comments, Research Papers, Essay in the field of Law & Multidisciplinary issue. Our aim is to upgrade the level of interaction and discourse about contemporary issues of law. We are eager to become a highly cited academic publication, through quality contributions from students, academics, professionals from the industry, the bar and the bench. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH & ANALYSIS ISSN 2582-6433 welcomes contributions from all legal branches, as long as the work is original, unpublished and is in consonance with the submission guidelines. 3 www.ijlra.com Volume 2 Issue 2 | June 2021 ISSN: 2582-6433 Constitutionality of Anti-Terror Laws in India By : Pulkit Taneja Introduction: Terrorist attacks in the United States on September 11, 2001, is remembered as the deadliest terrorist attack. Apart from many repercussions, the United States conducted thorough investigations and contacted the international community for support in their fight against terrorism. On September 28, 2001, the United Nations Security Council passed a unanimous resolution to agree on a collective fight against terrorism and draft and implement anti-terror laws.1 With the United States strengthening the Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act (PATRIOT Act),2 India faces many challenges in their fight against terrorism itself drafted the Prevention of Terrorism Ordinance (POTO),3 in October 2001. This ordinance was objectified to provide deterrence against cross border terrorism and other terrorist activities. This legislation included many provision of the Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987,4 which was repealed in 1995. POTO was legislated into an act in March 2002. Despite a lot of criticism faced by human rights activists, India's government-enforced Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA) to its full extent until it was repealed in 2004. Anti-terror laws are complicated to legislate. Neither can you treat terrorists like normal criminals, nor can the laws be the same for both. Many legal jurists believe that anti-terror laws all around the world are not only harsh but unreasonable. India is a party to various human rights convention which advocate the promotion of basic human rights and fundamental rights. India is a signatory to the Geneva Convention, the International covenant of civil and political rights, which provides citizen protection against cruelty, torture, freedom of expression and right to life. India's anti-terror laws if not directly, but do violate these provisions in principle. Although India is also a signatory to the UN Convention Against Torture, it is still yet to ratify it. This paper would be analysing the constitutionality of TADA and POTA with various case laws and provisions of the constitution. Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985 TADA was enacted amidst the assassination of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi. The provisions of TADA are straightforward in defining its violations. Section 3 of TADA defines a terrorist as (i) "a person who either commits a terrorist act (ii) attempt or conspires to commit, abet or incite or knowingly facilitate the 1 United Nations Security Council, Threats to International Peace and Security Caused by Terrorist Acts, U.N. Doc. S/RES/1373 (September 28, 2001). 2 Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT) Act, 2001 (USA). 3 Prevention of Terrorism Ordinance, 2001. 4 Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987. 4 www.ijlra.com Volume 2 Issue 2 | June 2021 ISSN: 2582-6433 commission of a terrorist act or any act preparatory to a terrorist act (iii) harbour or conceal, or attempt to harbour or conceal any person knowing that such person is a terrorist (iv) hold property that has been derived or obtained from commission of any terrorist act or that has been acquired through the terrorist funds".5 This act is based upon the Terrorist Affected Areas (Special Courts) Act, 1984 (TAAA), which administered setting up of special courts to adjudicate upon only scheduled offences in 'terrorist affected areas'.6 This act was substantially stern in regards to bail and detention. Section 15(5) of the TAAA lays down the bail procedure. According to this section, any suspect under this act would be denied bail if the prosecution opposes the motion or there is no substantial proof for the accused innocence.7 However, unlike the TAAA, when TADA was enacted in 1985, it did not only affect 'terrorist affected areas' but the entire country, which made it possible for law enforcement agencies to pick up anyone who they can prove to have a reasonable suspicion on and book them under this act. Many human rights advocates criticised this legislation as many reports were cited about the misuse of TADA to oppress political enemies of the government, human rights activist, minorities etc. Many provisions of this act triggered questions on this act's constitutional validity. Denial of Bail As mentioned above, TADA had its bail provision based on the TAAA. Incarceration of any suspected person without a formal charge sheet could last a year under TADA. This period is strictly restricted to a maximum of three months post which the accused is entitled to automatic bail. Although not explicitly mentioned as a right in the constitution, a person's right to bail is a part of his right to life and personal liberty under article 21 of the Constitution of India.8 There have been many cases in this country where judges of the supreme court have strongly emphasised on a person's right to bail. Justice Krishna Iyer in his judgement of the case the State Of Rajasthan, Jaipur vs Balchand focused upon a persons' right to bail in an investigation. He first pointed out the perspective behind the practice of detention of suspects. Custody of the suspect helps the court and law enforcement ensure that the suspect does not abscond, tamper with the witnesses or any evidence. Justice Iyer displayed the court's confidence on the suspect of not absconding or possibly tamper with the investigation and granted him bail.9 Confessions Section 15 of TADA,10 allowed a confession by the accused made to the police officer during an 5 Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 §3. 6 Terrorist Affected Areas (Special Courts) Act, 1984. 7 Terrorist Affected Areas (Special Courts) Act, 1984 §15(5). 8 The Constitution of India, 1950 Art. 21. 9 State of Rajasthan, Jaipur vs Balchand, 1977 AIR 2447. 10 Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 §3. 5 www.ijlra.com Volume 2 Issue 2 | June 2021 ISSN: 2582-6433 interrogation admissible during court proceedings. Sections 25 and 26 of the Indian Evidence Act, 11 deals with the nature of any confession made to a police officer. Any confession made to a police officer is considered neither relevant nor subject to any case proceedings. The rationale behind this provision is to protect the suspects from torture and physical hurt. Article 20(3) of India's Constitution 12 covers an accused against self-incrimination. In many of its judgements, the supreme court has emphasised the right against self-incrimination. In the case of Dagdu v. the State of Maharashtra, Justice Goswami explained the importance of this right, "The archaic attempt to secure confessions by hook or by crook seems to be the be-all and end-all of the police investigation. The police should remember that confession may not always be a short-cut to the solution. Instead of trying to "start" from a confession, they should strive to "arrive" at it. Else, when they are busy on their short route to success, good evidence may disappear due to in attention."13 On various accounts of criticism against this provision in TADA which is violative of articles 14, 20(3) and 21 of the Indian Constitution, the government replied that an extreme act like TADA must include extreme provisions to fulfil its purpose. Moreover, they also argued that TADA only makes these confessions admissible in court, the power of allowing it or any decision upon would still be in the hands of the court. This issue was later taken up in the Supreme Court where the Supreme Court accepted TADA and declared it to be well within the Consitution of India's bounds, including in their judgment a few suggestions to amend TADA.
Recommended publications
  • Bloomberg Hunger Stalks My Father’S India Long After Starvation Banished by Mehul Srivastava • Bloomberg News
    NEWSBloomberg Hunger Stalks My Father’s India Long After Starvation Banished By Mehul Srivastava • Bloomberg News October 23, 2012 – It was 1958, my father was still a child, and India was running out of food. That year’s wheat crop had slumped by 15 percent, the rice harvest by 12 percent, and prices in the markets were soaring. Far from his village in eastern India, ships laden with wheat were steaming toward the country, part of U.S. President Dwight Eisenhower’s plan to sell surplus grains, tobacco and dairy products to friendly countries. All India Radio gave daily updates on the convoys, and the army barricaded ports in Mumbai and Kolkata against the hungry crowds. “It was this very coarse, red wheat,” said Narsingh A villager sweeps the streets in Auar Village. Deo Mishra, a childhood friend of my father’s and Photographer: Sanjit Das/Bloomberg now a local politician in their home village. “We were told it was meant for American pigs,” said Mishra, stomachs; not enough to stay healthy. who, like my father, grew up listening to stories about More than five decades after those U.S. deliveries, the food shipments. “Back then, we weren’t any better I returned to the dusty, hot village of my father’s than American pigs. So we ate it. We ate it all and we childhood, hoping to understand why. begged for more.” In the arc of modern India’s elemental struggle to That year, and the hungry ones that followed, took feed its teeming people, my father’s childhood years their toll.
    [Show full text]
  • Uttar Pradesh Tracker Poll January 2017-Findings
    Uttar Pradesh Tracker Poll January 2017-Findings Q1: Assembly elections are going to be held in Uttar Pradesh in the next few weeks. Will you vote in these elections? N (%) 1: No 239 3.7 2: Yes 6073 93.8 3: May be 107 1.7 8: Can't say 54 .8 Total 6473 100.0 Q2: The Election Commission in its verdict has allotted the cycle symbol to the Akhilesh Yadav faction, deeming it to be the real Samajwadi party. Do you believe that it was the right decision or wrong? N (%) 1: Right 3951 61.0 2: Wrong 677 10.5 8: Can't say 1846 28.5 Total 6473 100.0 Q3: If UP Assembly elections are held tomorrow, which party will you vote for? N (%) 01: Congress 204 3.1 02: BJP 1863 28.8 03: BSP 1490 23.0 05: RLD 124 1.9 06: Apna Dal 3 .0 08: Apna Dal (Anupriya Patel) 14 .2 09: Quami Ekta Dal 9 .1 11: Peace Party 54 .8 12: Mahan Dal 20 .3 13: CPI 66 1.0 14: CPI(M) 16 .3 17: RJD 5 .1 Lokniti-Centre for the Study of Developing Societies, CSDS Page 1 Uttar Pradesh Tracker Poll January 2017-Findings N (%) 19: Shiv Sena 18 .3 21: AIMIM 25 .4 22: INLD 55 .8 23: LJP 13 .2 26: Lok Dal 17 .3 32: SP (Akhilesh Yadav)/SP 1972 30.5 56: SP (Mulayam Singh) 84 1.3 96: Independent 41 .6 97: Other parties 313 4.8 98: Can’t say/Did not tell 65 1.0 Total 6473 100.0 a: (If voted in Q3 ) On the day of voting will you vote for the same party which you voted now or your decision may change? N (%) Valid (%) Valid 1: Vote for the same party 4459 68.9 73.9 2: May change 800 12.4 13.3 8: Don't know 773 11.9 12.8 Total 6033 93.2 100.0 Missing 9: N.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Sheikha Moza Serious Breach and fl Agrant Violations Structed and Kidnapped a Qatari fi Shing China’S President Xi Jinping Was of International Law
    QATAR | Page 24 SPORT | Page 1 Qatar’s Adel leads T2 series aft er INDEX DOW JONES QE NYMEX QATAR 2-9, 24 COMMENT 22, 23 Second Aspire Kite REGION 9 BUSINESS 1-5, 17-20 solid fi nish Festival attracted 25,360.00 8,303.34 62.04 ARAB WORLD 9, 10 CLASSIFIED 6-16 +439.00 -62.77 +1.92 INTERNATIONAL 11-21 SPORTS 1-8 over 40,000 visitors in Dubai +1.76% -0.75% +3.19% Latest Figures published in QATAR since 1978 SUNDAY Vol. XXXIX No. 10754 March 11, 2018 Jumada Il 23, 1439 AH GULF TIMES www. gulf-times.com 2 Riyals FM in Sudan meeting Qatar informs In brief UN of airspace QATAR | Reaction violations by Qatar slams withdrawal of Jerusalem identity Qatar strongly condemned the Israeli Knesset’s approval of a law UAE, Bahrain authorising the interior minister to withdraw the Jerusalem identity atar has informed the UN Secu- in the region and without regard to Qa- from the Palestinians. In a statement rity Council and the UN Secre- tar’s security and stability.” yesterday, the Foreign Ministry Qtary-General of three violations The Government of Qatar has called described the move as unethical and of Qatar’s airspace by the United Arab upon the Security Council and the completely disregarding international Emirates (UAE) and the Kingdom of United Nations to take the necessary law, international humanitarian law Bahrain. measures under the Charter of the and UN conventions. The statement The message was handed over by HE United Nations to maintain interna- called on the international community the Permanent Representative of Qa- tional peace and security.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Editor's Desk *****
    9 July 2014 | Vol. 5, № 24. From the Editor’s Desk Dear FDI supporters, Welcome to the Strategic Weekly al-Barrak. While further demonstrations Analysis. seem likely, even after al-Barrak’s release, the record level of public expenditure in We open this week’s edition with a the latest Budget should help to counter discussion of the new star-rated healthy at least some grievances. food rating system, to be introduced to Australian consumers next month. This week’s edition concludes with an assessment of the promise made by both Next, we turn to Pakistan and analyse the candidates in Indonesia’s presidential importance to its economy of its booming election to extend the compulsory length textile industry and mango exports and of schooling from nine to 12 years. If also the interest that it holds for investors implemented, the measure will be an from China and the United States. important step in improving the country’s Our next article looks at India and education system. highlights the importance of the National I trust you will enjoy this edition of the Food Security Act – and the difficulties Strategic Weekly Analysis. being experienced in its implementation. Major General John Hartley AO (Retd) Moving next to the Middle East, we Institute Director and CEO evaluate the possibility of widespread Future Directions International civic unrest, in Kuwait, following the detention of opposition leader Musallam ***** Nutrition Rating System Given Green Light for Australian Food Packaging A voluntary, five-star, healthy food rating system will begin in Australia and New Zealand in August, following a public education campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • Dalit Feminism Versus Deadly Feudalism. Whatever the Validity of the POTA Cases Garh
    STATES ■ UTTAR PRADESH OUTDOING THE OUTLAW SHARAD SAXENA Dalit feminism versus deadly feudalism. Whatever the validity of the POTA cases garh. The father’s Raj Mahal (regal palace) in Bhadri and the son’s house in against Raja Bhaiya’s clan, to Mayawati’s voters they signal social revolution. Behti, near Kunda town, have been raided for the first time in living mem- ory. Weapons, including AK-56 assault ■ by Subhash MISHRA rifles, have been found. Says District TTAR PRADESH IS OFTEN Magistrate Mohammed Mustafa, “We mocked for being Ulta Pradesh have also sought the army’s help to (topsy-turvy province). Now it excavate the Raj Mahal.” has upturned traditional Among the other “treasures” hierarchies of caste oppres- unearthed from the Raj Mahal is a U SETTLING SCORES: Mayawati; the skeleton sion. In the benign reign of Chief Min- human skeleton. Fished out of a pond, ister Mayawati (BSP), a Dalit-led regime the police say it is of one Santosh fished out of a pond in Raj Mahal (right) is making life miserable for a Rajput Mishra, a local who disappeared in patriarch and his son. 2001. Also in police custody is the “eco- charisma, family loyalty and patronage. It began in October last year, when nomic empire” of the Bhadri estate. The He is at once abhorred and adulated. Raghuraj Pratap Singh or Raja Bhaiya, district administration has seized 33 The arrest of Udai Pratap has alarm- 33, independent MLA from Kunda, liquor shops. The legal owners of these ed the Rajput community. From Amar Pratapgarh district, was arrested for vends, it says, are proxies for Raja Singh, general secretary, Samajwadi allegedly threatening a pro-Mayawati Bhaiya and his father.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPREME COURT of INDIA Page 1 of 18
    http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 18 CASE NO.: Writ Petition (crl.) 132-134 of 2003 PETITIONER: S.K. Shukla & Ors RESPONDENT: State of U.P. & Ors. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/11/2005 BENCH: B.N. Agrawal & A.K. Mathur JUDGMENT: J U D G M E N T (with SLP(Crl) No. 1521/2004, T.P.(Crl) Nos. 82-84/2004 & Crl.A. 1511/2005 @ SLP (Crl) No. 5609/2004) A.K. MATHUR, J. All these cases are inter-related and common arguments were raised, therefore, they are disposed of by this common order. Writ Petition Nos 132-134/2003 under Article 32 of the Constitution of India is directed against the withdrawal of the POTA order by the State Government dated 29th August 2003 against accused Udai Pratap Singh, Raghuraj Pratap Singh @ Raja Bhaiya & Akshay Pratap Singh @ Gapalji. The Union of India was also permitted to be impleaded as a party-respondent. In SLP (Crl) 5609 of 2004, the petitioner has challenged the order passed by the POTA Review Committee dated 30.4.2004 under Section 60 of the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 (15 of 2002) (hereinafter referred to as 'the POTA'). Leave granted. In SLP (Crl) 1521 of 2004, the High Court order dated 24.2.2004 was challenged whereby accused Akshay Pratap Singh @ Gopalji was granted bail in case No.10 of 2003, under Section 3/4 of POTA, Police Station Kunda, District Pratapgarh, U.P. on his furnishing a personal bond for Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Special Judge, designated court, Kanpur.
    [Show full text]
  • 7SUNDC COL 07R2.QXD (Page 1)
    œND‰‹‰†‰KœND‰‹‰†‰œND‰‹‰†‰MœND‰‹‰†‰C INDIA SUNDAY TIMES OF INDIA New Delhi, September 7, 2003 7 Mulayam inducts six into BJP considers ‘Who’s a criminal? giving Mamata I was simply a another chance ministry as 37 desert BSP TIMES NEWS NETWORK By Arvind Singh Bisht 181 after the addition of 37 New Delhi: A high-level TIMES NEWS NETWORK BSP MLAs — is likely to meeting at the PM’s res- political opponent’ touch 187, as the breakaway idence on Saturday Lucknow: Six MLAs were BSP group has claimed the evening discussed the sworn in as members of the support of six more MLAs. oom No. Two in Shayma Prasad Mukherjee Hos- Mulayam Singh Yadav min- possibility of a few pital smells like a florist’s shop. Jubilant men Apart from this, Mulayam changes in the Vajpayee istry here late on Saturday already enjoys the support of R guard it’s entry as UP’s bigwigs flit in and out. night. The six are Shivpal ministry as well as the Basking in the adulation is Raghuraj Pratap Singh, the the Congress (16), RLD (14), impact of the political Singh Yadav and Azam Khan RKP (4), two MLAs each of enfant terrible of the Kunda royal family. UP’s first of the SP, Kokab Hamid and changes in Uttar POTA prisoner is still ‘‘trying hard to get used to crowds the CPM and the Loktantrik Pradesh. Sources said Anuradha Choudhary of the Congress and six of the splin- after a solitary confinement of six months’’. RLD and Rajvir Singh and the ministerial changes Confined as he is to hospital bed due to a spinal disor- tered groups, besides 13 Inde- were likely in the first Kusum Rai of the RKP.
    [Show full text]
  • Uttar Pradesh Tracker Poll January 2017-Findings
    Uttar Pradesh Tracker Poll January 2017-Findings Q1: Assembly elections are going to be held in Uttar Pradesh in the next few weeks. Will you vote in these elections? N (%) 1: No 186 2.9 2: Yes 6124 94.5 3: May be 109 1.7 8: Can't say 61 .9 Total 6481 100.0 Q2: The Election Commission in its verdict has allotted the cycle symbol to the Akhilesh Yadav faction, deeming it to be the real Samajwadi party. Do you believe that it was the right decision or wrong? N (%) 1: Right 3972 61.3 2: Wrong 615 9.5 8: Can't say 1894 29.2 Total 6481 100.0 Q3: If UP Assembly elections are held tomorrow, which party will you vote for? N (%) 01: Congress 253 3.9 02: BJP 1826 28.2 03: BSP 1196 18.5 05: RLD 61 .9 06: Apna Dal 3 .0 08: Apna Dal (Anupriya Patel) 14 .2 09: Quami Ekta Dal 11 .2 11: Peace Party 2 .0 12: Mahan Dal 1 .0 13: CPI 3 .0 14: CPI(M) 1 .0 17: RJD 3 .0 Lokniti-Centre for the Study of Developing Societies, CSDS Page 1 Uttar Pradesh Tracker Poll January 2017-Findings N (%) 19: Shiv Sena 1 .0 21: AIMIM 1 .0 22: INLD 2 .0 23: LJP 0 .0 26: Lok Dal 1 .0 32: SP (Akhilesh Yadav)/SP 2446 37.7 56: SP (Mulayam Singh) 104 1.6 96: Independent 2 .0 97: Other parties 12 .2 98: Can’t say/Did not tell 542 8.4 Total 6481 100.0 a: (If voted in Q3 ) On the day of voting will you vote for the same party which you voted now or your decision may change? N (%) Valid (%) Valid 1: Vote for the same party 4588 70.8 76.4 2: May change 643 9.9 10.7 8: Don't know 773 11.9 12.9 Total 6004 92.6 100.0 Missing 9: N.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Obsessive Pursuit Final.Pmd
    The UPA has been concerned at the manner in which POTA has been grossly misused in the past two years. There will be no compromise in the fight against terrorism. But given the abuse of POTA that has taken place, the UPA Government will repeal it, while existing laws are enforced strictly (Common Minimum Programme, UPA government, released on 27 May 2004) Preface On the night of 21 September 2004, the President promulgated two Ordinances. One of these repealed the Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA) a month before it was to come up for legislative review, and the other amended the provisions of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967, (UAPA). In its winter session both Houses of Parliament gave the Ordinances their approval. This means that POTA is no longer on the statute books and UAPA 1967 has been replaced by UAPA 2004. The promulgation of both Ordinances and their subsequent enactment, have to be viewed against the immediate backdrop of the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government’s National Common Minimum Programme (CMP), and election promises by most of its constituent members, primarily the Congress, to repeal POTA. A careful reading of the promise to repeal POTA in the CMP is telling, however. While pledging to remove POTA, the UPA government also cautions that it will not compromise in its fight against terrorism. It is no wonder then that the repeal of POTA has come alongside the amendment of an existing law (UAPA 1967) to include specific POTA provisions pertaining to definition of terrorist activities and banning of terrorist organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • 50 UAE, Bahrain Troops Killed in Yemen Clashes
    SUBSCRIPTION SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 5, 2015 THULQADA 21, 1436 AH No: 16631 MP calls to shut Drowned Syrian Asian football Iran embassy boys buried in fans cringe over after statement3 town they7 fled record48 scores 50 UAE, Bahrain troops killed in Yemen clashes Min 30º 150 Fils Black day for coalition • Amir sends condolences Max 42º ABU DHABI: The UAE said 45 of its troops were killed in Yemen and Bahrain said it lost five soldiers yesterday, the deadliest day for a Saudi-led coalition battling Yemeni Shiite rebels. The Yemeni government said an “accidental explosion” at an arms depot at a military base in the eastern province of Marib killed the Emiratis, but the Houthi rebels said their fighters launched a rocket attack that caused the blast. Coalition ally Bahrain said five of its soldiers were killed in southern Saudi Arabia where they had been posted to help defend the border with war- wracked Yemen, but it did not give a precise location. However, Yemen’s exiled presidency said the Bahrainis died in the same blast that killed the Emirati forces. Twenty three soldiers wounded in the incident died of their injuries, raising the toll from an initial 22, the Emirati state news agency WAM reported. The UAE armed forces did not dis- close the circumstances of what was its highest casualty toll of the six-month-old air war. But Anwar Gargash, UAE minister of state for foreign affairs, said on Twitter yesterday that “a rocket and an explosion at a weapons cache targeted the martyrs”. HH the Amir of Kuwait Sheikh Sabah Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al- Sabah yesterday sent a cable of condolences to UAE President Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed Al-Nahyan on the martyrdom of the UAE soldiers.
    [Show full text]
  • Constituency No Winner Candidate Party Runner-Up Candidate Party Votes GIRRAJ SINGH DHARMESH (G.S
    Diff. Constituency No Winner Candidate Party Runner-up Candidate Party Votes GIRRAJ SINGH DHARMESH (G.S. Agra Cantt. 87 GUTIYARI LAL DUWESH BSP BJP 6415 DHARMESH) Agra North 89 JAGAN PRASAD GARG BJP RAJESH KUMAR AGRAWAL BSP 23356 Agra Rural 90 KALI CHARAN SUMAN BSP HEMLATA SP 18754 Agra South 88 YOGENDRA UPADHYAYA BJP ZULFIQUAR AHMED BHUTTO BSP 22960 Ajagara 385 TRIBHUVAN RAM BSP LALJI SP 2083 Akbarpur 281 RAM MURTI VERMA SP SANJAY KUMAR BSP 26286 Akbarpur - Raniya 206 RAMSWAROOP SINGH SP PRATIBHA SHUKLA BSP 1243 Alapur 279 BHEEM PRASAD SONKAR SP TRIBHUVAN DATT BSP 30023 Aliganj 103 RAMESHWAR SINGH SP SANGHMITRA MAURYA BSP 26021 Aligarh 76 ZAFAR AALAM SP ASHUTOSH VARSHNEY BJP 23086 Allahabad North 262 ANUGRAH NARAYAN SINGH Congress HARSHVARDHAN BAJPAYEE BSP 16092 Allahabad South 263 HAJI PARVEJ AHMAD (TANKI) SP NAND GOPAL GUPTA NANDI BSP 414 Allahabad West 261 POOJA PAL BSP ATIQ AHAMAD Apna Dal 8885 Amanpur 101 MAMTESH BSP VIRENDRA SINGH SOLANKI SP 3656 Amethi 186 GAYATRI PRASAD SP AMEETA SINH Congress 8760 Amritpur 193 NARENDRA SINGH YADAV SP DR. JITANDRA SINGH YADAV JKP 18971 Amroha 41 MEHBOOB ALI SP RAM SINGH BJP 21805 Anupshahr 67 GAJENDRA SINGH BSP SYED HIMAYAT ALI SP 3501 Aonla 126 DHARM PAL SINGH BJP MAHIPAL SINGH YADAV SP 4408 Arya Nagar 214 SALIL VISHNOI BJP JITENDRA BAHADUR SINGH SP 15411 Asmoli 32 PINKI SINGH SP AQEEL UR REHMAN KHAN BSP 26389 Atrauli 73 VIRESH YADAV SP PREMLATA DEVI JKP 8867 Atrauliya 343 DR.SANGRAM YADAV SP SURENDRA PRASAD MISHRA BSP 43620 Aurai 394 MADHUBALA SP BAIJNATH BSP 21873 Auraiya 204 MADAN SINGH ALIAS
    [Show full text]
  • S. No. Name (Mr./Ms) Father's/Husband's Name Correspondence Address Date of Birth 1 Ms. Vijayta Raghav Mr. Manmohan Raghav C/O S
    PERSONAL ASSISTANT EXAMINATION-2013 List of Eligible Candidates Date of Examination will be intimated later on. S. No. Name (Mr./Ms) Father's/Husband's Name Correspondence Address Date of Birth C/o suresh Kumar, H.NO. 61, 1 Ms. Vijayta Raghav Mr. Manmohan Raghav Village- Motibagh, Nr. 8.09.1985 Nanakpura, N.D. 21. DB-75 A, DDA Flats, Hari 2 Ms. Shalini Sharma Mr. Gaurav Rana 5.11.1984 Nagar, New Delhi -64 D-8/184, East Gokal Pur, 3 Mr. Deepak Kumar Mr. Atal Singh 2.04.1985 Shahdara North East Delhi-94. WZ-303, Sant Garh, St. No. 18, 4 Ms. Surinder Kaur Mr. Daljeet Singh Ground Floor, M.B.S. Nagar, 15.06.1987 Tilak Nagar, New Delhi -18. E-196, Sector-23, Sanjay Nagar, 5 Ms. Jyoti Mr. Rajesh Kumar 18.02.1988 Ghaziabad, UP - 201002. 57-P, DIZ Area, Gole Market 6 Ms. Richa Bajaj Mr. Kamal Bajaj (Raja Bazar), Sec.-4, New Delhi- 5.05.1982 01. H.No. 50, Krishan Kunj colony, 7 Ms. Neetu Kansal Mr. Manish Kansal 18.04.1987 Laxmi Nagar, Delhi - 92. CBI Academy, Hapur Road, 8 Ms. Bharati Sharma Mr. Kamal Prakash Sharma Kamla Nehru Nagar, 22.02.1990 Ghaziabad, U.P.- 201002. H.No. 6612, Radhey Puri, Ext. 9 Ms. Rekha Mahour Mr. Dinesh Kumar 2.07.1989 No. 2, Krishna Nagar, Delhi -51. A/561, Madi Pur Colony, New 10 Ms. Madhu Bala Lt. Mr. Madan Lal 1.11.1986 Delhi - 63. D-106, Gali No. 5, Laxmi Nagar, 11 Ms. Premlata Mr. Dayaram Sharma 28.7.1990 New Delhi-92.
    [Show full text]