Advancing an Integrated Protocol for Rapid Assessment of Catch-And-Release Recreational

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Advancing an Integrated Protocol for Rapid Assessment of Catch-And-Release Recreational Advancing an integrated protocol for rapid assessment of catch-and-release recreational fisheries in the developing world by Shannon Bower A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biology Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario © 2017, Shannon Bower Dedication I dedicate this work to the hidden gods of India, who shine in every run and riffle on the river; to the mahseer, who shared their secrets; and to F., J. and H., who left too soon but shared and inspired so much. Special thanks and boundless gratitude to E., for walking with me, and to B. and F., for believing always. ii Abstract The global recreational fishing sector is the dominant fishing sector in freshwaters of the highly developed world and often more economically powerful than commercial fisheries, yet it is also ignored in international policy and suffers widespread data deficiencies from a lack of research. Despite the magnitude of potential benefits and consequences, little is known about recreational fishing activity, particularly in developing countries. I propose using an integrated rapid assessment protocol that adopts a social-ecological systems (SES) approach to address data deficiencies in catch and release (C&R) recreational fisheries of the developing world. In this work, I use the mahseer (Tor spp.) C&R recreational fishery of the Cauvery River, India as a case study. This dissertation identifies which linkages in the SES are most likely to influence sustainable management of the mahseer recreational fishery. To identify the nature and scope of the knowledge gaps in recreational fisheries of the developing world, I conducted a survey of fisheries professionals to rank knowledge and management needs. The results of the survey confirmed that recreational fisheries are subject to severe data deficiencies that require local level assessment to resolve. I then worked with local stakeholders to prioritize a research agenda that identified the need to research physiological responses of mahseer to C&R and angler behaviours and perspectives as valuable to this fishery. Therefore, I examined the physiological responses of mahseer to C&R, measured mahseer post-release movements, and compared the responses of mahseer caught multiple times through simulated capture processes. Finally, I conducted angler surveys to identify angler behaviours, perspectives, and information sources, then used expert interviews to place this information in local context. Overall, results show that mahseer are robust to C&R, but larger mahseer are likely to experience negative consequences post-release, and effects of combined stressors may be cumulatively interacting. There are iii opportunities to improve relationships among management organizations, angling groups and local communities to improve information flow and benefit-sharing throughout the mahseer fishery. The integrated rapid assessment protocol provides essential baseline data on biological and social responses to recreational fishing activity, and acts as a roadmap to guide future research and management efforts. Keywords: conservation social science, data deficiencies, fish conservation, freshwater fisheries, India, mahseer, social-ecological systems iv Acknowledgements I would like to acknowledge the contributions of many individuals to this body of work. I extend my sincere gratitude to my supervisor, Dr. Steven J. Cooke, for offering countless pieces of advice, an extraordinary amount of trust, and unwavering support. Thanks go out too to my essential collaborators, Dr. Andy Danylchuk and Dr. Rajeev Raghavan, for never failing to offer invaluable perspectives, limitless assistance, and enthusiasm. My formidable committee consisting of Drs. Jeremy Kerr, Douglas Beard, and John Dettmers offered much-needed advice and kept me on track throughout the process. It has been my great pleasure to collaborate with numerous professors, fisheries professionals, fellow students, volunteers, and anglers along the way on everything from manuscript writing to reel repair, and I am grateful to have worked with and learned from each and every one of you. Special acknowledgements go out to Shireen Bliss, Vivian Nguyen, Jacqueline Chapman, Petra Szekeres, Jill Brooks, Sascha Clark-Danylchuk, Lisa Donaldson, Trina Rytwinski, Jessica Taylor, Robert Lennox, Dan Struthers, Jake Brownscombe, Jason Thiem, and Nick Lapointe for hours spent in and on the water, and hours spent talking fish in the office and the pub. I extend special thanks to frequent collaborators from recreational fishing organizations operating in India, including the Coorg Wildlife Society, the Wildlife Association of South India, the All India Game Fishing Association, the Mahseer Trust, Pelagic Tribe, Metaphoronline.In, and the Karnataka Fisheries Department for all of the support and assistance generously offered. In particular, I owe Sandeep Chakrabarti, Derek D’Souza, Aiyappa C.P., Shyam Aiyappa, Adrian Pinder, Steve Lockett, Saravanan Shanmugam, Alexis Greenwood, and Marcus Greenwood a debt I could never repay, as this work truly could not have been completed without you. This work tells the story of the fish of the gods who live in the river, and the people who live by those stories. I hope I have done them justice. v Thesis Format and Co-authorship This dissertation consists of eight full chapters, including six data chapters in manuscript format. Two are currently published in peer-reviewed journals, two are currently under review in peer- reviewed journals, and the two remaining data chapters are currently being prepared for submission to peer-reviewed journals. As such, there is some repetition throughout the various chapters (particularly in the introductions to each chapter). All chapters in this dissertation reflect my research, however, many co-authors contributed to each study. Below, I list my contributions, and those of my co-authors, to each chapter. Chapter 2. Knowledge gaps and management priorities for recreational fisheries in the developing world Bower, S.D., Aas, O., Arlinghaus, R., Beard, T.D. Jr., Cowx, I.G., Danylchuk, A., Friere, K., Potts, W., Sutton, S., and Cooke, S.J. In Review. Knowledge gaps and management priorities for recreational fisheries in the developing world. Fish and Fisheries I designed the study, collected and analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. All co-authors contributed to manuscript editing. Cooke, Aas, Arlinghaus, Potts, Friere, and Sutton additionally contributed to survey design. Cowx and Beard contributed to identifying potential respondents. Chapter 3. Involving recreational fisheries stakeholders in development of research and conservation priorities for mahseer (Tor spp.) of India through collaborative workshops Bower, S.D., Danylchuk, A.J., Raghavan, R., Clark-Danylchuk, S., Pinder, A., Alter, A., and S.J. Cooke. 2017. Involving stakeholders in development of research and conservation priorities for mahseer (Tor spp.) of India using hands-on research participation and workshops. Fisheries Research. 186(3):665-671. vi I designed the study, collected and analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. All co-authors contributed to manuscript editing. Danylchuk and Cooke additionally contributed to study design. All authors participated in conducting workshops and Raghavan, Pinder, and Alter were integral to organizing workshops. Chapter 4. Rapid assessment of the physiological impacts caused by catch-and-release angling on blue-finned mahseer (Tor sp.) of the Cauvery River, India Bower, S.D., A.J. Danylchuk, R. Raghavan, S. Clark-Danylchuk, A. Pinder and S.J. Cooke. 2016. Rapid assessment of the physiological impacts caused by catch-and-release angling on blue-finned mahseer (Tor sp.) of the Cauvery River, India. Fisheries Management and Ecology. 23: 208-217. I designed the study, collected and analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. All co-authors contributed to manuscript editing. Danylchuk and Cooke additionally contributed to study design. All authors participated in field work. Chapter 5. Identifying sub-lethal behavioural responses of Tor khudree to catch-and- release recreational angling using radio telemetry Bower, S.D., Mahesh, N., Raghavan, R., Danylchuk, A.J., and Cooke, S.J. (In Review). Sub- lethal responses of mahseer (Tor khudree) to catch-and-release recreational fishing. Fisheries Research, WRFC8 Special Issue. I designed the study, collected and analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. All co-authors contributed to manuscript editing. Danylchuk and Cooke additionally contributed to study design. Mahesh participated in field work and was integral to organizing logistics. vii Chapter 6. Consequences of simulated multiple catch and release events on reflex impairment, ventilation rate, and body condition in Tor khudree Bower, S.D., Raghavan, R., Danylchuk, A.J., Szekeres, P., and Cooke, S.J. (In Prep). Consequences of simulated multiple catch and release events to whole body impairment and body condition in Tor khudree. I designed the study, collected and analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. All co-authors contributed to manuscript editing. Cooke additionally contributed to study design. Szekeres participated in field work. Chapter 7. Angler perceptions and expert knowledge of the Cauvery River mahseer (Tor khudree) catch-and-release recreational fishery in Karnataka, India Bower, S.D., Raghavan, R., Danylchuk, A.J., Potts, W.N., Sutton, S., and Cooke, S.J. (In Prep).
Recommended publications
  • District Disaster Management Plan 2019-20 Ramanagara District, Ramanagara
    GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA DISTRICT DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN 2019-20 RAMANAGARA DISTRICT, RAMANAGARA - 1 - CHAPTER-1 DDMP INTRODUCTION 1.0 Introduction Disaster management has been an evolving discipline particularly in India over last one decade. With increasing frequency and intensity of disasters and large number of people coming in their way, the subject needed a more systematic attention and a planned approach. Disaster management Act, 2005 provides mandate for development of comprehensive disaster management plan at national, state and district level. In particular, there is a need to have a comprehensive plan at district level, which is the cutting edge level for implementation of all policy guidelines and strategies. There has also been a significant change in understanding of disaster management from Global to grassroots levels in last few years. Hyogo Framework for Action and later Disaster Management Act, 2005, brought a paradigm shift in disaster management from a reactive relief based approach to a more proactive disaster risk reduction approach. The evolving understanding of the subject of disaster management, lessons learnt from the past disasters and the mandate provided by Disaster Management Act, 2005 to DDMA's to develop comprehensive disaster management plan provides an excellent opportunity to develop an effective and pragmatic District Disaster Management Plan (DDMP) for Ramanagara. 1.1 Rationale for District Disaster Management Plan (DDMP) Disaster causes sudden disruption to normal life of a society and causes damages to property and lives to such an extent that normal social and economic mechanisms in the society are disrupted and community will not be able to cope up with the situation without external aid.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage of Mysore Division
    HERITAGE OF MYSORE DIVISION - Mysore, Mandya, Hassan, Chickmagalur, Kodagu, Dakshina Kannada, Udupi and Chamarajanagar Districts. Prepared by: Dr. J.V.Gayathri, Deputy Director, Arcaheology, Museums and Heritage Department, Palace Complex, Mysore 570 001. Phone:0821-2424671. The rule of Kadambas, the Chalukyas, Gangas, Rashtrakutas, Hoysalas, Vijayanagar rulers, the Bahamanis of Gulbarga and Bidar, Adilshahis of Bijapur, Mysore Wodeyars, the Keladi rulers, Haider Ali and Tipu Sultan and the rule of British Commissioners have left behind Forts, Magnificient Palaces, Temples, Mosques, Churches and beautiful works of art and architecture in Karnataka. The fauna and flora, the National parks, the animal and bird sanctuaries provide a sight of wild animals like elephants, tigers, bisons, deers, black bucks, peacocks and many species in their natural habitat. A rich variety of flora like: aromatic sandalwood, pipal and banyan trees are abundantly available in the State. The river Cauvery, Tunga, Krishna, Kapila – enrich the soil of the land and contribute to the State’s agricultural prosperity. The water falls created by the rivers are a feast to the eyes of the outlookers. Historical bakground: Karnataka is a land with rich historical past. It has many pre-historic sites and most of them are in the river valleys. The pre-historic culture of Karnataka is quite distinct from the pre- historic culture of North India, which may be compared with that existed in Africa. 1 Parts of Karnataka were subject to the rule of the Nandas, Mauryas and the Shatavahanas; Chandragupta Maurya (either Chandragupta I or Sannati Chandragupta Asoka’s grandson) is believed to have visited Sravanabelagola and spent his last years in this place.
    [Show full text]
  • UPSC Preparation
    UPSC Preparation Mekedatu Project Mekedatu Balancing Reservoir and Drinking Water Project has both financial and social benefits as it proposes a plan to provide drinking water for nearly 100 lakh people with an additional benefit of generating 400 MW power. Therefore, this project is proposed with an aim to conserve water, prevent energy shortage and provide drinking water facilities to Bangalore cities and surrounding areas in Cauvery basin. Facts about Mekedatu Project for UPSC Brief Facts about Mekedatu Project - UPSC Prelims What is the full name of the project? Mekedatu Balancing Reservoir and Drinking Water Project What will be the total developmental period of the 4 years (i.e., 48 months) entire proposed project? Among which two states, Mekedatu project has Karnataka and Tamil Nadu caused disputes? What is the total cost estimated for the proposed Rs 9,000 crores project? Background The possibility of developing power from Mekedatu project has been under examination since 1948, when Kollegal territory was a part of Madras Presidency. However, this project wasn’t examined till the reorganization of the States in the year 1956. After 1956, initially this project was investigated by the Hydro-Electric Project Investigation Department of GoM and then on by the Karnataka Power Corporation Limited (KPCL) from the year 1986 onwards. KPCL prepared a report titled “Mekedatu Hydroelectric Project – Project Report” in July 1996. However, the further consideration of the same got delayed at that time, directing Government of Karnataka to wait for the Award of the Hon’ble Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal (CWDT). The subject of sharing of the waters was adjudicated by the Hon’ble Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal (CWDT).
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Environmental Examination: Kollegal–Hannur Road
    Karnataka State Highways Improvement III Project (RRP IND 42513-014) Initial Environmental Examination January 2017 IND: Karnataka State Highways Improvement Project III Kollegal to Hanur Road Prepared by Project Implementation Unit, KSHIP, Government of Karnataka for the Asian Development Bank CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ i A. Introduction .................................................................................................................... i B. Objectives of the IEE ..................................................................................................... i C. Description of the Project ............................................................................................... i D. Policy, Legal and Administrative Framework ................................................................. v E. Description of the Environment ................................................................................... vii F. Analysis of Alternatives ............................................................................................... xii G. Anticipated Impacts and Mitigation Measures ............................................................. xii H. Public Consultation ................................................................................................... xviii I. Environmental Management Plan .............................................................................. xix J. Conclusion
    [Show full text]
  • Mekedatu Balancing Reservoir and Drinking Water Project Is A
    MEKEDATU BALANCING RESERVOIR AND DRINKING WATER PROJECT, RAMANAGARA AND CHAMARAJANAGARA DISTRICTS OF KARNATAKA Mekedatu Balancing Reservoir and Drinking Water Project is a multipurpose project aiming at providing drinking water facilities to Bangalore Metropolitan area and surroundings and also generation of 400 MW hydro-electric power. Karnataka being the eighth largest State in India with a population of 6,10,95,297 as per 2011 Census is blessed with major perennial Rivers such as Krishna and Cauvery besides 13 West flowing Rivers. However, the State is still under drought and facing drinking water scarcity besides facing acute power shortage. As a measure to conserve water, preventing energy shortage and provide drinking water facilities to Bangalore cities and surrounding areas in Cauvery basin, Cauvery Neeravari Nigam Ltd., Government of Karnataka is planning to build a balancing reservoir across River Cauvery near Mekedatu which will utilize the natural bed slope of the river from Shivanasamudra to State border. The project on successful implementation will enable in regulating the flow and ensuring that the downstream commitment of allowing 177.25 TMC which includes 10 TMC towards environmental flow to Tamil Nadu is met along with the drinking water facilities to the areas deprived of drinking water needs in Karnataka. The objectives of Mekedatu Balancing Reservoir and Drinking Water Project include; i. Utilizing additional 4.75 TMC of water to provide drinking water facility to Bengaluru Metropolitan Region, its adjoining area etc by way of proposing a scheme to tap water from the foreshore of the intended Mekedatu Balancing Reservoir and Drinking water project. ii.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2008-09 July 2009
    GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT (MAJOR AND MEDIUM) ANNUAL REPORT 2008-09 JULY 2009 INDEX SL. PAGE CONTENTS NO. NO. 1 INTRODUCTION 5 2 ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE 6 3 ACHIEVEMENTS OF WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT DURING 2008-09 7 4 ACCELERATED IRRIGATION BENEFIT PROGRAMME 9 5 SPECIAL REHABILITATION PACKAGE 15 6 WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION 16 7 CENTRAL MECHANICAL ORGANISATION 25 8 KARNATAKA ENGINEERING RESEARCH STATION 28 9 WATER AND LAND MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE (WALMI) 33 NIGAM 10 KRISHNA BHAGYA JALA NIGAM LIMITED 34 10.1 UPPER KRISHNA PROJECT 35 10.2 BAGALKOT TOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, BAGALKOT 45 11 KARNATAKA NEERAVARI NIGAMA LIMITED 49 11.1 AN OVERVIEW OF PROJECTS UNDER THE CHIEF ENGINEER, IRRIGATION 50 (NORTH), BELGAUM 11.1.1 GHATAPRABHA PROJECT 51 11.1.2 HIPPARAGI IRRIGATION PROJECT 52 11.1.3 MARKANDEYA RESERVOIR PROJECT 53 11.1.4 DUDHGANGA IRRIGATION PROJECT 54 11.1.5 LIFTING OF HIRANYAKESHI WATERS INTO G.R.B.C CANAL 55 11.1.6 BELLARYNALA PROJECT 56 11.1.7 SRI RAMESHWARA L.I. SCHEME 57 11.2 AN OVERVIEW OF PROJECTS UNDER THE CHIEF ENGINEER, MALAPRABHA 58 PROJECT ZONE, DHARWAD. 11.2.1 MALAPRABHA PROJECT 59 11.2.2 HARINALA IRRIGATION PROJECT 60 11.2.3 KALASA NALA AND BANDHURNALA PROJECT 61 11.2.4 JAVALUHALLA L.I. SCHEME 62 11.2.5 BENNIHALLA L.I. SCHEME (5 NOS.) 63 11.2.6 KOLACHI L.I. SCHEME 64 11.2.7 KONNUR L.I. SCHEME 65 11.2.8 SHIGGAON L.I. SCHEME 66 11.3 AN OVERVIEW OF PROJECTS UNDER THE CHIEF ENGINEER, IRRIGATION 67 CENTRAL ZONE, MUNIRABAD 2 SL.
    [Show full text]
  • Y SIVARAJAVEL IAS ACADEMY 1 Monthly Current Affairs Are Published at Free of Cost on Behalf of Our SIVARAJAVEL IAS ACADEMY with the Best Teachers
    PB SIVARAJAVEL IAS ACADEMY SIVARAJAVEL IAS ACADEMY 1 Monthly Current Affairs are published at free of cost on behalf of Our SIVARAJAVEL IAS ACADEMY with the best teachers. This can be used by students who are preparing for TNPSC and all kinds of state competitive examinations. Join the following web address to download it for free. Website : www.sivarajavelias.com Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/Sivarajaveliasacademy Instagram : https://www.instagram.com/sivarajavel_ias_academy Telegram : https://t.me/sivarajavel_ias_academy Twitter : https://twitter.com/sivarajavel_ias Kindly share your feedback [email protected] HEAD OFFICE No.97, AF Block, Shanthi Colony, 12th Main Road, Anna Nagar West, Chennai – 600 040. Ph: 9626364444, 9626369899 Branches TIRUNELVELI TRICHY No.106B, 3rd Floor, Gilgal Complex, No.143, 4th Floor, VOC ground Opposite, Trivandrum Lakshmi Complex, Salai Road, Road, Palayamkottai – 627 002 Thillai Nagar, Trichy-18 Ph: 9626252500. Ph: 9751500300, 9786500300 2 SIVARAJAVEL IAS ACADEMY SIVARAJAVEL IAS ACADEMY 3 INDEX TAMILNADU NEWS 4 NATIONAL NEWS 11 INTERNATIONAL NEWS 38 COVID NEWS 40 ECONOMY NEWS 41 PROGRAMS AND YOJANAS 46 SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 52 ENVIRONMENT 56 REPORTS AND INDICES 61 SPORTS NEWS 65 PERSONALITIES 67 AWARDS 71 DEFENCE NEWS 73 BOOKS AND AUTHORS 76 IMPORTANT DAYS 78 TNPSC BITS 89 2 SIVARAJAVEL IAS ACADEMY SIVARAJAVEL IAS ACADEMY 3 NEWS AMILNADU T The history of the elected legislature in Tamil Nadu began with the Justice Party rule CENTINARY YEAR OF THE during the British regime. ELECTED LEGISLATURE IN TAMILNADU HISTORY OF TAMILNADU LEGISLATURE The first elected legislature in the State, originally called the Madras Legislative Council, was established in 1921 under the Government of India Act, 1919.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Environmental Examination
    Bengaluru Smart Energy Efficient Power Distribution Project (RRP IND 53192) Initial Environmental Examination Document Stage: Final Report Project Number: 53192-001 and 53192-003 October 2020 India: Bengaluru Smart Energy Efficient Power Distribution Project Prepared by Bengaluru Electricity Supply Company Limited (BESCOM), Government of Karnataka for the Asian Development Bank. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 2020) Currency Unit – Indian rupee (₹) ₹1.00 = $0.0136 $1.00 = ₹73.80 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank BMAZ – Bangalore Metropolitan Area Zone BESCOM – Bengaluru Electricity Supply Company Limited CEA – Central Electricity Authority CPCB – Central Pollution Control Board, Government of India DPR – detailed project report EA – executing agency EIA – environmental impact assessment EMoP – environmental monitoring plan EMP – environmental management plan EPC – engineering, procurement, and construction ESC – environment and social cell GHG – greenhouse gases GRM – grievance redress mechanism IA – implementing agency ICC – Internal Complaints Committee IEE – initial environmental examination MOEFCC – Ministry of Environment, Forests & Climate Change, Government of India PMU – project management unit RoW – right of way SF6 – sulfur hexafluoride WEIGHTS AND MEASURES km – kilometer (1,000 meters) kV – kilovolt (1,000 volts) kW – kilowatt (1,000 watts) NOTES In this report, "$" refers to US dollars unless otherwise stated. This Initial Environmental Examination Report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area Table of Contents Executive Summary i I.
    [Show full text]
  • Mekedatu Project: River Cauvery
    Mekedatu Project: River Cauvery drishtiias.com/printpdf/mekedatu-project-river-cauvery Why in News Recently, the Karnataka government has decided to challenge before the National Green Tribunal (NGT) its decision to appoint a joint committee. The joint committee is supposed to look into allegations of unauthorised construction activity taking place in Mekedatu, where Karnataka had proposed to construct a dam across the Cauvery. Mekedatu, meaning goat’s leap, is a deep gorge situated at the confluence of the rivers Cauvery and its tributary Arkavathi. Key Points 1/5 Mekedatu Project: The Rs. 9,000 crore project aims to store and supply water for drinking purposes for the Bengaluru city. Around 400 megawatts (MW) of power is also proposed to be generated through the project. It was first approved by the Karnataka state government in 2017. It received approval from the erstwhile Ministry of Water Resources for the detailed project report and is awaiting approval from the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC). The approval from MoEFCC is crucial because 63% of the forest area of the Cauvery Wildlife Sanctuary will be submerged. In 2018, Tamil Nadu approached the Supreme Court (SC) against the project even if Karnataka had held that it would not affect the flow of water to Tamil Nadu. In June 2020, during the Cauvery Water Management Authority’s meeting, Tamil Nadu reiterated its opposition to the project. Reasons for Opposition by Tamil Nadu: Tamil Nadu is opposed to any project being proposed in the upper riparian unless it was approved by the SC. Karnataka has no right to construct any reservoir on an inter-state river without the consent of the lower riparian state i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Karnataka Draft Annual Plan
    GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA KARNATAKA DRAFT ANNUAL PLAN 19 8 7 - 8 8 PLANNING DEPARTMENT NOVEMBER 1986 Sub. NatioB»l ^ rIi , National Institute of Educatio»»| IP I n T11 Trf ,a n d A m in is tr a tio n 17-B ,Sri A ur b Doe. N o..i!^ Dttc. m m LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To The Secretary, Planning Commission^ Government of India, Yojana Bhavan, Samsadmarg, NEW DELHL Sir, With reference to your letter received here on 3-9-86 requesting the State Government to send the Annual Plan proposals for 1987-88, Kamataka^s Draft Annual Plan for 1987-88 is submitted ' for the consideration of the Planning Commission, Yours faithfully, D,M. Nanjundappa Commissioner Sc Secretary to 'Vidhana Soudha' Government of Karnataka, Bangalore, Planning &. Institutional O ctober 20, 1986, Finance Departments, CONTENTS Page No. I REVIEW OF ANNUAL PLAN 1986-87 1 n REVIEW OF DISTRICT PLANS 1986-87 19 A. Development in the Districts 21 B. Review of the District Plans ^1 m STATE PLAN : 1987-88 - AN OUTLINE U7 IV DISTRICT PLANS : 1987-88 77 A. Zilla Pari shad and Mandal Panchayat Plans 79 B. District Plans 83 V AGRICULTURE AND ALLIED SERVICES 87 A. The Approach 89 B. Agriculture 90 C. Soil Conservation 112 D. Horticulture 121 E. Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Services 148 F. Diary Developinent 160 G. Animal Health and Veterinary Biologicals 162 H. Fisheries 1 6S I. Forest 175 3. Agricultural Education and Research 180 K. Marketing and Quality Control 182 L. Storage and Warehousing 185 M. Investment in Agricultural and Financial Institutions 186 VI IIURAL DEVELOPMENT 187 VH CO-OPERATION 195 vm IRRIGATION AND FLOOD CONTROL 203 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Conservation and Sustainability of Nandi Hill Ecosystem
    REPORT ON THE CONSERVATION AND SUSTAINABILITY OF NANDI HILL ECOSYSTEM BANGALORE ENVIRONMENT TRUST COMMONS CELL AND CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL LAW RESEARCH AND ADVOCACY NATIONAL LAW SCHOOL OF INDIA UNIVERSITY 12 FEBRUARY 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Contents Page No. Acknowledgments 3 PART I – INTRODUCTION 4-9 A. THE CONTEXT – GENESIS OF THE RESEARCH WORK 5 B. OBJECTIVES OF THE RESEARCH 6 C. METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH 6 D. INSTITUTION AND THE RESEARCH TEAM 7 1. THE INSTITUTION 7 2. THE RESARCH TEAM 9 PART II – THE REPORT 10-55 A. INTRODUCTION 11 B. SIGNIFICANCE OF NANDI HILL ECOSYSTEM 14 C. ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION AND ENQUIRY 16 i. Tourism 16 ii. Governance 19 iii. River Conservation and Groundwater Depletion 20 iv. Forest Fires 23 v. Land Grabbing 24 vi. Sand Mining and Quarrying 25 vii. Airport and the issues around it 26 D. SCIENTIFIC AND OTHER EXPERT SOLUTIONS 28-30 E. LEGAL AND POLICY ANALYSIS 31 a. In Re Green Belts 31 b. Laws regarding Forests 33 c. Groundwater Conservation 37 d. Tourism and Ecosystem 38 e. Forest Fire 39 f. Land Grabbing 40 F. CONCLUSIONS AND PROPOSED SECTOR WISE SOLUTIONS 42-62 i. Tourism 42 o Short term solutions 43 o Long term solutions 44 ii. Governance 47 o Long term solutions iii. River Conservation and Groundwater Depletion 49 o Long term solutions 50 iv. Forest Fires 54 o Long term solutions 54 v. Land Grabbing 56 o Long term solutions 56 vi. Sand Mining and Quarrying Short term solutions 58 o Long term solutions 58 vii. Airport and issues around it 61 CONCLUSION 61 G.
    [Show full text]
  • Karnataka GIS Overview & Status Report
    Overview and Status Report Karnataka GIS Overview & Status Report KARNATAKA STATE REMOTE SENSING APPLICATIONS CENTRE Dept. of Information Technology, Bio-Technology and Science & Technology “Doora Samvedi Bhavana”, Major Sandeep Unnikrishnan Road, Doddabettahalli, Bengaluru - 560097. Ph No.: +91 80 29720557/58, Fax: +91 80 29720556 August 2017 Contributors: KGIS - Mission Team © Karnataka State Remote Sensing Applications Centre Karnataka GIS - Overview & Status Report As on 31st August 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................. 1 B. OVERVIEW OF KARNATAKA-GIS ................................................................................ 6 1. Background …………………………………………………………………………….6 2. Introduction …………………………………………………………………………….6 3. Objectives …………………………………………………………………………….7 4. Expected Benefits ........................................................................................................... 7 5. Components of KGIS .................................................................................................... 8 5.1 Asset ........................................................................................................................... 9 5.1.1 Version - 1 ...................................................................................................... 10 5.1.2 K-GIS Spatial Framework ............................................................................ 10 5.1.3 Version - 2 .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]