Download Issue (PDF)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download Issue (PDF) ~o/ THE DEMOCRATIC LEFT April 19't~Vol. 111, No. 4 ~217 Edited by MICHAEL HARRINGTON .s Israelis, Palestinians and self-determination by SHLOMO AVINERI with the fact that the PLO is aiming at a completely The current flurry of diplomatic activity in the different solution. Whether through a "salami tactic" Middle East should not obscure the fact that the or through an outright "war of national liberation," fundamental conflict has not neared resolution. This all sections of the PLO are committed to the ultimate is a conflict between two national movements, each destruction of Israel. Not one voice has been raised laying claim to the same piece of land. One of these until now within the PLO suggesting that it will ac- movements, Israeli Zionism, accepts the other's claim cept the existence of Israel as a legitimate body poli- to self-determination. But none of the Arab parties tic in the Middle East. Because of this, the Israeli in the conflict has ever acknowledged Israel's right to moderate, who accepts the idea of national self- exist. That is the fundamental issue. determination on a universal scale as part of his social- The Palestinian Liberation Organization, in par- ist credo, who even accepts the establishment of a ticular, explicitly states in its charter (in paragraph (Continued on page 2) 20) that the Jews are not a nation, but merely a religious group, and hence have no right and no capa- city to sustain a body politic. Consequently, the PLO Notes from a political program calls for the establishment of a "secular" Palestine, in which "Moslems, Christians, and Jews" diary: March 1975 will live together, the implication being that the Jews, not being a nation, deserve only religious freedom. by MICHAEL HARRINGTON This perception has characterized the Arab attitude March 1. New York. The Democratic Socialist Or- to Jewish nationalism from its outset. The tragedy, ganizing Committee National Board meeting was the and intellectual scandal, of this position, is that it busiest we've ever had. Plans were discussed for an denies to the other side that very right-national self- organizers' school in the Midwest in June, a youth determination-thatit claims for itself. conference, a West Coast conference in the fall. There The PLO's denial of the Jews' right to national was a feeling that the opportunities for the Left are self-determination puts Israeli moderates in a tight grea~r than at any time in a generation. Moreover, a corner. On one hand, there is growing Israeli sympathy political consensus emerged in the course of the debate: for Palestinian self-determination, not only among that the times demand a greater emphasis on the intellectuals and journalists. The ruling Labor Party specifically socialist content of our politics. We remain, has gone a long way towards accepting the fact that of course, the partisans of the democratic Left and without solving the Palestinian problem, true concilia- we understand that the basic choice of 1976 will be tion cannot be achieved. Thus, the Israeli Labor between the mass liberal Left and the conservative Party's 1973 election manifesto explicitly spoke of a Right. But within that framework, everybody felt Jordanian-Palestinian solution to the Palestinian quest that the economic crisis is making socialist proposals for self-determination, though not of a separate West more relevant and necessary. Bank Palestinian state. This is a long way from In the middle of the meeting, I had to leave to go former Prime Minister Meir's hard-line statements over to a New Democratic Coalition conference at that "there are no Palestinians." Similarly, the present Chelsea High School. Morris Udall was questioned Prime Minister, Itzhak Rabin, has repeatedly stated by a panel of Congresswoman Elizabeth Holtzman, that it is incumbent upon Israel to help solve the Robert Browne, the black economist, and myself. On Palestinian problem. the whole, Udall made a much better impression on me On the other hand, the Israeli moderate is faced today than he had when he visited the New York delegation at the Kansas City mini-convention. In Shlomo Avineri, author of The Social and Political December he had rattled off a series of one-liners, Thought of Karl Marx, is Professor of Political Science some good, some bad, none serious. Today he re- and Dean of the Faculty of Social Science at the He- sponded to specific questions about domestic eco- brew University of Jerusalem. A volume of essays nomic problems with that informed expertise one finds edited by him on Israel and the Palestinians has been in a practiced Member of Congress. recently published by St. Martin's Press. (Continued on page 5) can be no doubt the Israeli government made a big Israel ... mistake by not stating publicly during the Palestinian (Continued from page 1) debate that it would negotiate with any Palestinian Palestinian entity on the West Bank and Gaza-at group which accepted Israeli existence, an offer the considerable cost to Israel - has great difficulty PLO would have refused to its own detriment), the dressing Palestinian grievances, has great difficulty Israeli government really can not negotiate with a in viewing the PLO as a partner in any future delib- group that explicitly denies Israeli self-determination. erations. It is because the PLO calls only for an What, then, of the Palestinians in the future? The exclusivist, one-sided self-determination, rather than immense publicity achieved by the PLO through its because of the Palestinians' terrorism, that the PLO legitimization by the UN has obscured the fact that is unacceptable from my own socialist point of view. the Palestinian community is not totally represented Yasir Arafat's speech at the United Nations only by Beirut-based guerrilla groups, for there are three confirms this view. Never in his speech did Arafat groups of Palestinians-those under Israeli rule on mention the name "Israel." He only referred to "Zion- the West Bank and in Gaza, those in Jordan east of ism" (within the formula of "Imperialism, Colonialism, the river, and the Beirut-based organizations. The and Zionism") and compared it to French colonialism great majority of the Palestinians, those in the West in Algeria and American imperialism in Vietnam. Bank and in Jordan proper, have basically opted for This puts the Israeli government in a difficult posi- the moderate, diplomatic solution. The West Bank tion. Leaving tactical disagreements aside (there population, for example, much as it would like freedom from Israeli occupation, and as much as it admires PLO-inspired hijackings and murders, is ultimately realistic and moderate and has not, over the years, For an independent Portugal given the PLO that kind of territorial base which a successful guerrilla organization needs for its victory. Recent events in Portugal are disturbing. The Jordanian monarchy has been thoroughly Pales- Parties to the right and to the left of the Por- tinized since 1970, and also represents the moderate tuguese Communists have been banned, and the Palestinian element, ready for a compromise with army has made it absolutely clear that this Israel and aware that it will have to live with the month's election will make little difference in how Jewish state as a neighbor. the country is ruled. As Flora Lewis reported in If the diplomatic moves with Egypt-and possibly the March 22 New York Times, leftists through- even with Syria-are to succeed, this moderate Pales- out Europe are upset by the political turns in tinian-Jordanian factor, pushed aside after Rabat, Portugal. In the words of one French Socialist, must return to center stage. Then a compromise solu- "There is no doubt that the Portuguese Socialist tion, more or less based on 1967 borders, plus security Party is hardest hit by what has happened in guarantees for Israel, may be worked out between Lisbon." Israel, Jordan and the moderate Palestinians of the For our part, we echo Mario Soares' hopes that West Bank. If by that time some of the less radical Portugal can achieve socialism on its own terms, groups within the PLO will change their intransigent that the last colonial power not "trade one impe- and exclusivist position, relinquish their non-accept- rialism for another." ance of Israel and join in the discussion, further steps toward true conciliation would be possible. But the But there can be no question that Portugal PLO in it present structure and its present ideological must solve its own problems without the "help" stance is not and cannot become an element of under- of the United States. James Buckley's crude standing. Peace can only be founded on mutuality and saber-rattling (we should seize the Azores and if reciprocity, not exclusivism and supremacy. D we fail, fire the Joint Chiefs of Staff) is predict- able and wrong. And the more "sophisticated" reasoning of Senator Hubert Humphrey is just as 11,wdeu.M, wrong. He wants us to use American power "to o{ support democratic elements in Portugal." The THE DEMOCRATIC LEFT way we helped "democratic elements" in Viet- Michael Harrington, Editor nam? In Greece? In Chile? In the Dominican Re- Jack Clark, Managing Editor public? Such monstrosities can not be justified Gretchen Donart, Production Manager on the basis that the Kremlin does it, too. People who helped to put this issue out: Humphrey and others who want to demonstrate Harlan Baker, David Bensman, Sheila Srown, Harry the United States' commitment to "democratic Fleischman, Marjorie Gel_lermann, Selma Lenihan, elements" would do better to urge that American Mark Schaeffer, Cynthia Ward. power not be used to maneuver in the internal Signed articles express the views of the author.
Recommended publications
  • The Rise of Syriza: an Interview with Aristides Baltas
    THE RISE OF SYRIZA: AN INTERVIEW WITH ARISTIDES BALTAS This interview with Aristides Baltas, the eminent Greek philosopher who was one of the founders of Syriza and is currently a coordinator of its policy planning committee, was conducted by Leo Panitch with the help of Michalis Spourdalakis in Athens on 29 May 2012, three weeks after Syriza came a close second in the first Greek election of 6 May, and just three days before the party’s platform was to be revealed for the second election of 17 June. Leo Panitch (LP): Can we begin with the question of what is distinctive about Syriza in terms of socialist strategy today? Aristides Baltas (AB): I think that independently of everything else, what’s happening in Greece does have a bearing on socialist strategy, which is not possible to discuss during the electoral campaign, but which will present issues that we’re going to face after the elections, no matter how the elections turn out. We haven’t had the opportunity to discuss this, because we are doing so many diverse things that we look like a chicken running around with its head cut off. But this is precisely why I first want to step back to 2008, when through an interesting procedure, Synaspismos, the main party in the Syriza coalition, formulated the main elements of the programme in a book of over 300 pages. The polls were showing that Syriza was growing in popularity (indeed we reached over 15 per cent in voting intentions that year), and there was a big pressure on us at that time, as we kept hearing: ‘you don’t have a programme; we don’t know who you are; we don’t know what you’re saying’.
    [Show full text]
  • Download/Print the Study in PDF Format
    GENERAL ELECTION IN GREECE 7th July 2019 European New Democracy is the favourite in the Elections monitor Greek general election of 7th July Corinne Deloy On 26th May, just a few hours after the announcement of the results of the European, regional and local elections held in Greece, Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras (Coalition of the Radical Left, SYRIZA), whose party came second to the main opposition party, New Analysis Democracy (ND), declared: “I cannot ignore this result. It is for the people to decide and I am therefore going to request the organisation of an early general election”. Organisation of an early general election (3 months’ early) surprised some observers of Greek political life who thought that the head of government would call on compatriots to vote as late as possible to allow the country’s position to improve as much as possible. New Democracy won in the European elections with 33.12% of the vote, ahead of SYRIZA, with 23.76%. The Movement for Change (Kinima allagis, KINAL), the left-wing opposition party which includes the Panhellenic Socialist Movement (PASOK), the Social Democrats Movement (KIDISO), the River (To Potami) and the Democratic Left (DIMAR), collected 7.72% of the vote and the Greek Communist Party (KKE), 5.35%. Alexis Tsipras had made these elections a referendum Costas Bakoyannis (ND), the new mayor of Athens, on the action of his government. “We are not voting belongs to a political dynasty: he is the son of Dora for a new government, but it is clear that this vote is Bakoyannis, former Minister of Culture (1992-1993) not without consequence.
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook Indiveu – Party Preferences
    Codebook InDivEU – party preferences European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies December 2020 Introduction The “InDivEU – party preferences” dataset provides data on the positions of more than 400 parties from 28 countries1 on questions of (differentiated) European integration. The dataset comprises a selection of party positions taken from two existing datasets: (1) The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File contains party positions for three rounds of European Parliament elections (2009, 2014, and 2019). Party positions were determined in an iterative process of party self-placement and expert judgement. For more information: https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/65944 (2) The Chapel Hill Expert Survey The Chapel Hill Expert Survey contains party positions for the national elections most closely corresponding the European Parliament elections of 2009, 2014, 2019. Party positions were determined by expert judgement. For more information: https://www.chesdata.eu/ Three additional party positions, related to DI-specific questions, are included in the dataset. These positions were determined by experts involved in the 2019 edition of euandi after the elections took place. The inclusion of party positions in the “InDivEU – party preferences” is limited to the following issues: - General questions about the EU - Questions about EU policy - Questions about differentiated integration - Questions about party ideology 1 This includes all 27 member states of the European Union in 2020, plus the United Kingdom. How to Cite When using the ‘InDivEU – Party Preferences’ dataset, please cite all of the following three articles: 1. Reiljan, Andres, Frederico Ferreira da Silva, Lorenzo Cicchi, Diego Garzia, Alexander H.
    [Show full text]
  • Dimensions and Alignments in European Union Politics: Cognitive Constraints and Partisan Responses
    Working Paper Series in European Studies Volume 1, Number 3 Dimensions and Alignments in European Union Politics: Cognitive Constraints and Partisan Responses DR. SIMON HIX DEPARTMENT OF GOVERNMENT LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND POLITICAL SCIENCE Houghton Street London, WC2A 2AE United Kingdom ([email protected]) EDITORIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE: GILLES BOUSQUET KEITH COHEN COLLEEN DUNLAVY ANDREAS KAZAMIAS LEON LINDBERG ELAINE MARKS ANNE MINER ROBERT OSTERGREN MARK POLLACK GREGORY SHAFFER MARC SILBERMAN JONATHAN ZEITLIN Copyright © 1998 All rights reserved. No part of this paper may be reproduced in any form without permission of the author. European Studies Program, International Institute, University of Wisconsin--Madison Madison, Wisconsin http://polyglot.lss.wisc.edu/eur/ 1 Dimensions and Alignments in European Union Politics: Cognitive Constraints and Partisan Responses Simon Hix Department of Government, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom Abstract As the European Union (EU) has evolved, the study agenda has shifted from ‘European integration’ to ‘EU politics’. Missing from this new agenda, however, is an understanding of the ‘cognitive constraints’ on actors, and how actors respond: i.e. the shape of the EU ‘political space’ and the location of social groups and competition between actors within this space. The article develops a theoretical framework for understanding the shape of the EU political space (the interaction between an Integration-Independence and a Left-Right dimension and the location of class and sectoral groups within this map), and tests this framework on the policy positions of the Socialist, Christian Democrat and Liberal party leaders between 1976 and 1994 (using the techniques of the ECPR Party Manifestos Group Project).
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Full Issue (PDF)
    JULY/AUGUSTl 996 VOLUME XXV NUMBER 4 Sl . 50~.,o,_o_ - ... , DEMOCRATIC ,., , . ~ 6 AMA11.~ , ·X 523 1 06 1 PUBLISHED BY THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISTS OF AMERICA -."" M 'Y . E D T 0 R A L DSA's Perspective on the 1996 Elections A STATEMENT FROM DSA's NATIONAL PouncAL COMMITTEE he key goal for progre.ssives an~ socialms in_t~e 1996 elec­ • supporting civil rights by defeating the California Civil T tions is to defeat the Republican right. To do thtS involv~ three Rights Initiative (which would actually take away key rights important usks: for people of color and women); • defeat Bob Dole; • advancing the principle of health care for all by support • retake Congre.ss from the Republicans; and for iniuatives on HMOs; and • enlarge and strengthen the Progressive Caucus in • strengthening the principle of a living wage for all by sup­ Congress. pon for the initiative rai~ing the minimum wage. To most of us on the le.ft the 1996 Presidential race offers little In addttion, the Progress Caucus has developed a •progressive in the way of hope for positive social and economic change. Polls today Prom1~e to America• which includes eleven agenda items from corporate suggest that President Clinton has a commanding lead. But it's far to early responsibility to a living wage to downsizing the military budget. In Wash­ to declare victory. And of course a Ointon victory would be a partial one ington, DSA has been working ~-ith the Caucus and the Committee on at best. Econoffilc Insecunty to develop public bearing~ on issues related w this Four years ago, Clinton won the Presidential election by fo­ agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenger Party List
    Appendix List of Challenger Parties Operationalization of Challenger Parties A party is considered a challenger party if in any given year it has not been a member of a central government after 1930. A party is considered a dominant party if in any given year it has been part of a central government after 1930. Only parties with ministers in cabinet are considered to be members of a central government. A party ceases to be a challenger party once it enters central government (in the election immediately preceding entry into office, it is classified as a challenger party). Participation in a national war/crisis cabinets and national unity governments (e.g., Communists in France’s provisional government) does not in itself qualify a party as a dominant party. A dominant party will continue to be considered a dominant party after merging with a challenger party, but a party will be considered a challenger party if it splits from a dominant party. Using this definition, the following parties were challenger parties in Western Europe in the period under investigation (1950–2017). The parties that became dominant parties during the period are indicated with an asterisk. Last election in dataset Country Party Party name (as abbreviation challenger party) Austria ALÖ Alternative List Austria 1983 DU The Independents—Lugner’s List 1999 FPÖ Freedom Party of Austria 1983 * Fritz The Citizens’ Forum Austria 2008 Grüne The Greens—The Green Alternative 2017 LiF Liberal Forum 2008 Martin Hans-Peter Martin’s List 2006 Nein No—Citizens’ Initiative against
    [Show full text]
  • L'estado Da Índia
    Sandrine Bègue La Fin de Goa et de l’Estado da Índia : Décolonisation et Guerre Froide dans le Sous-Continent Indien (1945-1962) Volume II colecção BIBLIOTECA DIPLOMÁTICA 709 Biblioteca Diplomática Série D: Teses Conselho Editorial Presidente: Professor Doutor Armando Marques Guedes Professor Doutor João Amador Embaixador Leonardo Mathias Professor Doutor Nuno Piçarra General José Luís Pinto Ramalho Professor Doutor António de Vasconcelos Saldanha 710 LA FIN DE GOA ET DE L’ESTADO DA ÍNDIA colecção BIBLIOTECA DIPLOMÁTICA Sandrine Bègue La Fin de Goa et de l’Estado da Índia : Décolonisation et Guerre Froide dans le Sous-Continent Indien (1945-1962) Directeur de thèse : Monsieur Jacques Weber Volume II Jury M. Singaravelou M. A. Dias Farinha M. M.-J. Zins Mme D. Couto M. M. Catala colecção BIBLIOTECA DIPLOMÁTICA 711 Ficha técnica Título La Fin de Goa et de l’Estado da Índia : Décolonisation et Guerre Froide dans le Sous-Continent Indien (1945-1962) – Volume II Autor Sandrine Bègue Coordenação Editorial IDI - MNE Edição Colecção Biblioteca Diplomática do MNE – Série D Ministério dos Negócios Estrangeiros, Portugal Design Gráfico Risco, S.A. Paginação, Impressão e Acabamento Europress, Lda. Tiragem 1000 exemplares Data Maio de 2007 Depósito Legal 257988/07 ISBN 978-972-9245-55-8 712 LA FIN DE GOA ET DE L’ESTADO DA ÍNDIA Table des Matières VOLUME II Chapitre VIII : Une Autogestion Fragile 721 1. L’intégration renforcée de l’Estado da Índia dans la communauté lusotropicale 721 Le «nouveau» statut de Goa selon Salazar 721 Les efforts d’investissements portugais pour le développement de Goa 740 Les mesures de contournement du blocus indien 743 La bataille de l’éducation : empêcher l’exode de la jeunesse goanaise vers l’Inde 756 2.
    [Show full text]
  • SYRIZA, Bloco and Podemos
    Transnational networking and cooperation among neo-reformist left parties in Southern Europe during the Eurozone crisis: SYRIZA, Bloco and Podemos Vladimir Bortun The thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of Portsmouth. March 2019 Abstract European parties to the left of social democracy have always lagged behind the main political families in terms of transnational cooperation at the level of the EU. However, the markedly transnational character of the Eurozone crisis and of the management of that crisis has arguably provided a uniquely propitious context for these parties to reduce that gap. This research project aims to establish whether they achieved that by focusing on three parties that were particularly prone to seeking an increase in their transnational cooperation: SYRIZA from Greece, Bloco de Esquerda from Portugal and Podemos from Spain. For these parties not only come from the member states most affected by the crisis, both economically and politically, but they also share several programmatic and strategic features favouring such an increase. By using a mix of document analysis, semi-structured interviews and non-participatory observation, the thesis discusses both the informal and formal transnational networking and cooperation among the three parties. This discussion reveals four key findings, with potentially useful insights for wider transnational party cooperation that are to be pursued in future research. Firstly, the transnational networking and cooperation among SYRIZA, Bloco and Podemos did increase at some point during the crisis, particularly around SYRIZA’s electoral victory in January 2015. Secondly, since the U-turn of that government in July 2015, SYRIZA’s relationship with both Bloco and Podemos has declined significantly, as reflected in their diverging views of the EU.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Paper 2
    WORKING PAPER 2 The United States and the Portuguese Decolonization (1974 – 1976) Kenneth Maxwell, David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies, Harvard University WORKING PAPER N.º 2 The United States and the Portuguese Decolonization (1974 – 1976) Kenneth Maxwell I The relationships between the United States and Portugal had always had a special cast to them as the result of the Azores base. And one of the most peculiar aspects of the U.S. role in Portugal and the former Portuguese territories in Africa, is that the Azores base not only contributed to the longevity of Portugal’s African empire, but also, because of the economic consequences of the U.S. use of that base to re-supply Israel in 1973, became one of the most important immediate causes of the coup d’état of April 25, 1974, which brought about its demise. Between the 1940s and the 1970s, there had been a succession of quite distinct turning points, particular moments when a variety of possibilities and options existed in the situation on all sides—in Portugal, in the United States, in Europe in general, in South Africa—that might have helped produce some change in Portugal’s intransigent stance in Africa. But on each occasion when a “window for change” occurred, Portugal, rather than compromising in the face of the inevitable, instead took a more stubborn stance. And on each occasion the Azores were an ingredient in the equation.i Between 1944 and 1947 in Portugal, for instance, those opposed to the Salazar dictatorship had expected that a process of democratization would follow the end of the Second World War and the victory of the Allies.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor MI 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 UNNEGOTIATED TRANSITION . SUCCESSFUL OUTCOME: THE PROCESSES OF DEMOCRATIC CONSOLIDATION IN GREECE DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Neovi M, Karakatsanis, B.A., M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • What's Left of the Left: Democrats and Social Democrats in Challenging
    What’s Left of the Left What’s Left of the Left Democrats and Social Democrats in Challenging Times Edited by James Cronin, George Ross, and James Shoch Duke University Press Durham and London 2011 © 2011 Duke University Press All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America on acid- free paper ♾ Typeset in Charis by Tseng Information Systems, Inc. Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data appear on the last printed page of this book. Contents Acknowledgments vii Introduction: The New World of the Center-Left 1 James Cronin, George Ross, and James Shoch Part I: Ideas, Projects, and Electoral Realities Social Democracy’s Past and Potential Future 29 Sheri Berman Historical Decline or Change of Scale? 50 The Electoral Dynamics of European Social Democratic Parties, 1950–2009 Gerassimos Moschonas Part II: Varieties of Social Democracy and Liberalism Once Again a Model: 89 Nordic Social Democracy in a Globalized World Jonas Pontusson Embracing Markets, Bonding with America, Trying to Do Good: 116 The Ironies of New Labour James Cronin Reluctantly Center- Left? 141 The French Case Arthur Goldhammer and George Ross The Evolving Democratic Coalition: 162 Prospects and Problems Ruy Teixeira Party Politics and the American Welfare State 188 Christopher Howard Grappling with Globalization: 210 The Democratic Party’s Struggles over International Market Integration James Shoch Part III: New Risks, New Challenges, New Possibilities European Center- Left Parties and New Social Risks: 241 Facing Up to New Policy Challenges Jane Jenson Immigration and the European Left 265 Sofía A. Pérez The Central and Eastern European Left: 290 A Political Family under Construction Jean- Michel De Waele and Sorina Soare European Center- Lefts and the Mazes of European Integration 319 George Ross Conclusion: Progressive Politics in Tough Times 343 James Cronin, George Ross, and James Shoch Bibliography 363 About the Contributors 395 Index 399 Acknowledgments The editors of this book have a long and interconnected history, and the book itself has been long in the making.
    [Show full text]