DOCSLIB.ORG

Castle Point Borough Council Local Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Matter 1: Procedural and Legal Requirements Castle Point Borough Council Local Plan Inspectors Matters Issues and Questions (MIQs) MATTER 1: PROCEDURAL AND LEGAL REQUIREMENTS (8th April 2021) 1 Matter 1: Procedural and Legal Requirements Contents Issue: Whether all Statutory and Regulatory requirements have been met? ........................................ 4 Duty to Cooperate .................................................................................................................................. 4 Question 1 ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Question 2 ........................................................................................................................................... 6 Sustainability Appraisal ........................................................................................................................... 9 Question 3 ........................................................................................................................................... 9 Question 4 ......................................................................................................................................... 10 Question 5 ......................................................................................................................................... 10 Question 6 ......................................................................................................................................... 11 Question 7 ......................................................................................................................................... 12 Habitats Regulations Assessment ......................................................................................................... 12 Question 8 ......................................................................................................................................... 12 Question 9 ......................................................................................................................................... 13 Question 10 ....................................................................................................................................... 15 Question 11 ....................................................................................................................................... 18 Local Development Scheme .................................................................................................................. 19 Question 12 ....................................................................................................................................... 19 Community Involvement ...................................................................................................................... 19 Question 13 ....................................................................................................................................... 19 Climate Change ..................................................................................................................................... 26 Question 14 ....................................................................................................................................... 26 Equalities ............................................................................................................................................... 27 Question 15 ....................................................................................................................................... 27 Superseded policies .............................................................................................................................. 29 Question 16 ....................................................................................................................................... 29 2 Matter 1: Procedural and Legal Requirements Please note: Where the Council is proposing modifications to policies or reasoned justifications in the submitted plan these are detailed in the responses as follows: • Additional and new text in Red and underlined • Deleted text is shown by strike though 3 Matter 1: Procedural and Legal Requirements Issue: Whether all Statutory and Regulatory requirements have been met? Duty to Cooperate Question 1 Is there clear evidence that, in the preparation of the Plan, the Council has engaged constructively, actively and on an ongoing basis with neighbouring authorities and prescribed bodies on strategic matters and issues with cross-boundary impacts in accordance with section 33A of the 2004 Act? 1. Section 33(a) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, requires the Council to actively consult and engage with other local planning authorities, the County Council and other prescribed bodies in the preparation of the local plan. 2. To support its response to the MIQs, the Council has produced an ASELA and Strategic Planning and Duty to Cooperate Topic Paper [DTC-008]. ASELA is the Association of South Essex Local Authorities, which consists of Basildon, Brentwood, Castle Point, Rochford, Southend on Sea and Thurrock Councils, plus Essex County Council. 3. ASELA was established in 2018, with a Memorandum of Understanding (DTC-004) and Statement of Common Ground (DTC-005). ASELA was established in part due to the failing under duty to cooperate of the 2016 version of the Castle Point Local Plan. 4. Since then, the Council has been an active partner in ASELA. It acts as the partnerships accountable body, and until the Covid-19 pandemic, hosted most meetings. Council officers lead on strategic projects, such as the South Essex Plan, housing delivery, digital technology, and connectivity, and participates right across the ASELA work programme. 5. ASELA established the Joint Officers Group to collaborate on the South Essex Plan and act as a forum for the discussion and consideration of cross boundary strategic planning issues. In addition, it is the forum through which evidence is jointly commissioned, which has helped inform the preparation of this plan. 6. South Essex has defined itself as a Housing Market Area and a Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) was completed for the area in 2016 (H-003) and updated in 2017 (H-006). The SHMA excludes Brentwood. Brentwood has its own SHMA, which has been used to inform its Local Plan which is in Examination (Brentwood SHMA Part One and Brentwood SHMA Part Two). The South Essex SHMA is under consideration for review, and as part of that review its relationship with the Brentwood SHMA will be explored. 4 Matter 1: Procedural and Legal Requirements 7. In the preparation of the plan, pre-submission, the Council held a round table duty to cooperate meeting in November 2018. This followed attendance at similar style meetings held by Chelmsford City Council in the preparation of their, now adopted, local plan1. 8. In addition, the Council held one-to-one meetings with each of the six South Essex Councils and Essex County Council. These meetings were minuted and has led to the agreement of Statements of Common Ground with Southend-on-Sea, Rochford and Brentwood. Meanwhile, Statements of Common Ground have been drafted with Basildon and Thurrock, but are outstanding at the time of writing. The outcomes of those duty to cooperate discussions are set out below in response to Question 2. 9. With regards to Essex County Council, the Council undertook a series of thematic meetings covering strategic planning, education, public health and social care, transport, flooding and minerals and waste. Essex County Council have additionally provided detail comments and suggested edits to the Plan, including the modifications. 10. In respect of the prescribed bodies, the Council has collaborated in the preparation of the plan, and where possible, having regard to resource availability, agreed statements of common ground. The outcome of these is set out below in response to Question 2. 11. Furthermore, as set out on pages 12 and 13 of the Topic Paper [DTC-008] the Council hosts and participates in a wide range of joint meetings with partners including through the Castle Point and Rochford Local Strategic Partnership and the Castle point Regeneration Partnership, the health bodies, police and blue light services, the voluntary sector, Homes England, business community and Environment Agency. All opportunities are taken to present, explain and discuss the Local Plan and consider the implications for partners and their views on the Plan. 12. As a consequence, the Council has a positive relationship with councils and prescribed bodies who have collaborated positively in the preparation of this plan. In addition, the Council consulted widely at Regulation 19 stage prior to the plan being submitted and offered duty to cooperate meetings will all Essex Councils prior to the submission of the Plan. 13. The Council has published three Duty to Cooperate Reports to take account of each stage of the plan reparation process: CON-001 - New Local Plan Duty to Cooperate Report 2018; CON-002 - New Local Plan Duty to Cooperate Report 2019 CON-003 - Duty to Cooperate Report 2020 1 https://www.chelmsford.gov.uk/_resources/assets/attachment/full/0/1395887.pdf 5 Matter 1: Procedural and Legal Requirements 14. None of the Councils nor prescribed bodies objected to the plan as a failing under the duty to cooperate failing. 15. The Council is satisfied that it has fulfilled the requirements
Recommended publications
  • South Essex Outline Water Cycle Study Technical Report

    South Essex Outline Water Cycle Study Technical Report

    South Essex Outline Water Cycle Study Technical Report Final September 2011 Prepared for South Essex: Outline Water Cycle Study Revision Schedule South Essex Water Cycle Study September 2011 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 01 April 2011 D132233: S. Clare Postlethwaite Carl Pelling Carl Pelling Essex Outline Senior Consultant Principal Consultant Principal Consultant WCS – First Draft_v1 02 August 2011 Final Draft Clare Postlethwaite Rob Sweet Carl Pelling Senior Consultant Senior Consultant Principal Consultant 03 September Final Clare Postlethwaite Rob Sweet Jon Robinson 2011 Senior Consultant Senior Consultant Technical Director URS/Scott Wilson Scott House Alençon Link Basingstoke RG21 7PP Tel 01256 310200 Fax 01256 310201 www.urs-scottwilson.com South Essex Water Cycle Study Limitations URS Scott Wilson Ltd (“URS Scott Wilson”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of Basildon Borough Council, Castle Point Borough Council and Rochford District Council (“Client”) in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by URS Scott Wilson. This Report is confidential and may not be disclosed by the Client or relied upon by any other party without the prior and express written agreement of URS Scott Wilson. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon information provided by others and upon the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested and that such information is accurate. Information obtained by URS Scott Wilson has not been independently verified by URS Scott Wilson, unless otherwise stated in the Report.
  • Internal Draft Version June 2006)

    Internal Draft Version June 2006)

    (Internal Draft Version June 2006) THURROCK LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK (LDF) SITE SPECIFIC ALLOCATIONS AND POLICIES “ISSUES AND OPTIONS” DEVELOPMENT PLAN DOCUMENT [DPD] INFORMAL CONSULTATION DRAFT CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. STRATEGIC & POLICY CONTEXT 4 3. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE BOROUGH 6 4. KEY PRINCIPLES 7 5. RELATIONSHIP WITH CORE STRATEGY VISION, 7 OBJECTIVES & ISSUES 6. SITE SPECIFIC PROVISIONS 8 7. MONITORING & IMPLEMENTATION 19 8. NEXT STEPS 19 APPENDICES 20 GLOSSARY OF TERMS REFERENCE LIST INTERNAL DRAFT VERSION JUNE 2006 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 We would like to get your views on future development and planning of Thurrock to 2021. A new system of “Spatial Planning” has been introduced that goes beyond traditional land-use planning and seeks to integrate the various uses of land with the various activities that people use land for. The new spatial plans must involve wider community consultation and involvement and be based on principles of sustainable development. 1.2 The main over-arching document within the LDF portfolio is the Core Strategy. This sets out the vision, objectives and strategy for the development of the whole area of the borough. The Site Specific Allocations and Policies is very important as it underpins the delivery of the Core Strategy. It enables the public to be consulted on the various specific site proposals that will guide development in accordance with the Core Strategy. 1.3 Many policies in the plans will be implemented through the day-to-day control of development through consideration of planning applications. This document also looks at the range of such Development Control policies that might be needed.
  • A Review of the Ornithological Interest of Sssis in England

    A Review of the Ornithological Interest of Sssis in England

    Natural England Research Report NERR015 A review of the ornithological interest of SSSIs in England www.naturalengland.org.uk Natural England Research Report NERR015 A review of the ornithological interest of SSSIs in England Allan Drewitt, Tristan Evans and Phil Grice Natural England Published on 31 July 2008 The views in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Natural England. You may reproduce as many individual copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with Natural England, 1 East Parade, Sheffield, S1 2ET ISSN 1754-1956 © Copyright Natural England 2008 Project details This report results from research commissioned by Natural England. A summary of the findings covered by this report, as well as Natural England's views on this research, can be found within Natural England Research Information Note RIN015 – A review of bird SSSIs in England. Project manager Allan Drewitt - Ornithological Specialist Natural England Northminster House Peterborough PE1 1UA [email protected] Contractor Natural England 1 East Parade Sheffield S1 2ET Tel: 0114 241 8920 Fax: 0114 241 8921 Acknowledgments This report could not have been produced without the data collected by the many thousands of dedicated volunteer ornithologists who contribute information annually to schemes such as the Wetland Bird Survey and to their county bird recorders. We are extremely grateful to these volunteers and to the organisations responsible for collating and reporting bird population data, including the British Trust for Ornithology, the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, the Joint Nature Conservancy Council seabird team, the Rare Breeding Birds Panel and the Game and Wildlife Conservancy Trust.
  • Tilbury to Southend-On-Sea Nature Conservation Assessment

    Tilbury to Southend-On-Sea Nature Conservation Assessment

    Nature Conservation Assessment for Coastal Access Proposals between Tilbury and Southend- on-Sea Assessment of Coastal Access Proposals between Tilbury and Southend-on-Sea on sites and features of nature conservation concern Thursday 27th February 2020 (Sanderling wintering in Southend-on-Sea – Darren Braine) Page 1 Nature Conservation Assessment for Coastal Access Proposals between Tilbury and Southend- on-Sea About this document This document should be read in conjunction with the published Reports for the Tilbury to Southend-on-Sea Stretch and the Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) for: Special Protection Areas (SPAs): - Thames Estuary and Marshes SPA - Benfleet and Southend Marshes SPA - Outer Thames Estuary SPA Ramsar Sites: - Thames Estuary and Marshes Ramsar - Benfleet and Southend Marshes Ramsar The Coastal Access Reports contain a full description of the access proposals, including any additional mitigation measures that have been included. These Reports can be viewed here: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/england-coast-path-tilbury-to-southend-on-sea A HRA is required for European sites (SPA and Ramsar sites). The HRA is published alongside the Coastal Access Reports. This document, the Nature Conservation Assessment (NCA), covers all other aspects (including SSSIs, MCZs and undesignated but locally important sites and features) in so far as any HRA does not already address the issue for the sites and features in question. The NCA is arranged site by site. Maps 1 to 3 shows designated sites along this stretch of coast. See Annex 1 for an index to designated sites and their notified features for this stretch of coast. This also identifies features that have been considered within any HRA, due to the overlap of notified interests.
  • Local Flood Risk Management Strategy, Appendix D2

    Local Flood Risk Management Strategy, Appendix D2

    Thurrock Local Flood Risk Management Strategy – Strategic Environmental Assessment Scoping Report March 2015 Thurrock Council Civic Offices New Road Grays Essex RM17 6SL JBA Project Manager Claire Gardner JBA Consulting The Library St Philips Courtyard COLESHILL Warwickshire B46 3AD RH16 4NG Revision history Revision Ref / Date Issued Amendments Issued to Draft v0-2 / March 2015 Claire Gardner Final Thurrock Council Environment Agency Natural England English Heritage Contract This report describes work commissioned by Thurrock Council. Rachel Drabble and Laura Thomas of JBA Consulting carried out this work. Prepared by Rachel Drabble BSc (Hons) Environmental Consultant Reviewed by Laura Thomas BA MRes MCIEEM Senior Ecologist Purpose This document has been prepared as a SEA Scoping Report for Thurrock Council. JBA Consulting accepts no responsibility or liability for any use that is made of this document other than by the Client for the purposes for which it was originally commissioned and prepared. JBA Consulting has no liability regarding the use of this report except to Thurrock Council. 2014s1942 Thurrock LFRMS SEA Scoping Report v1.0.docx i Copyright © Jeremy Benn Associates Limited 2015 Carbon footprint A printed copy of the main text in this document will result in a carbon footprint of 223g if 100% post-consumer recycled paper is used and 283g if primary-source paper is used. These figures assume the report is printed in black and white on A4 paper and in duplex. JBA is aiming to reduce its per capita carbon emissions. 2014s1942 Thurrock LFRMS SEA Scoping Report v1.0.docx ii Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 The Local Flood Risk Management Strategy ..............................................................
  • Standing Environment Group for the Greater Thames Estuary

    Standing Environment Group for the Greater Thames Estuary

    Standing Environment Environment Group for the Greater Thames Estuary Arrangements for the provision of environmental advice in pollution incidents affecting sea and estuarial water and shoreline between and including Lowestoft to Ramsgate. Part One - General Overview PENULTIMATE DRAFT 8 September, 2011 M.C. King Greater Thames Estuary Standing Environment Group Operational Guidance Document (version one) July 2004 Page 0 of 91 Table of Contents 1 DISTRIBUTION LIST: ..........................................................................................................................3 2 RECORD OF AMENDMENTS............................................................................................................5 3 PREFACE……………........................................................................................................................6 4 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................................7 5 SCOPE OF THIS DOCUMENT..........................................................................................................7 6 THE STANDING ENVIRONMENT GROUP FOR THE GREATER THAMES ESTUARY ...........................8 6.1 TERMS OF REFERENCE. ............................................................................................................................. 8 6.2 SCOPE OF GROUP FUNCTIONS ................................................................................................................ 8 6.3 AREA OF OPERATION ..............................................................................................................................
  • Thurrock Council As Part of the Development of Its Greengrid Strategy

    Thurrock Council As Part of the Development of Its Greengrid Strategy

    Appendix 1.2.13. INDEX 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 General Introduction 1 1.2 Background 3 2. OVERVIEW OF THURROCK 2.1 Recent Changes 5 2.2 Other Changes, Opportunities and Issues 6 2.3 BAP Resources Within Thurrock 6 2.3.1 Habitats 7 2.3.2 Species 14 2.3.3 Other BAP Issues 18 2.3.4 Summary of BAP Action Points 19 2.4 The Role of Local Wildlife Sites 20 2.5 Discussion of Local Wildlife Sites 21 2.6 Introduction to Wildlife Corridors 22 2.6.1 Corridor Requirements 23 2.6.2 Wildlife Corridors in Thurrock 26 2.6.3 Planning for the Future 28 References and Selected Bibliography Glossary of Abbreviations MAP1 Primary Corridors/Barriers Appendix 1 Development of Local Wildlife Site Selection Criteria In Essex Appendix 2 Species Indicative of Ancient Woodland In Essex Appendix 3 Species Indicative of Old, Unimproved Neutral/Acid Grassland and Marsh In Essex Appendix 4 Indicative Chalk Grassland Plants Appendix 5 Evolution of Local Nature Conservation Initiatives Appendix 6 Local Wildlife Sites Register Appendix 7 Tables and Maps of Potential Local Wildlife Sites Appendix 8 A Review Of Thurrock SSSIs Within The Local Wildlife Site Framework GREENGRID WILDLIFE STRATEGY FOR THURROCK 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 General Introduction Lying at the centre of the Thames Gateway, Thurrock is a key growth area that is set to undergo significant change. The next 15 years will see large numbers of additional houses plus development for employment. The protection and enhancement of those elements of the environment which give Thurrock its positive identity, including its ecological character, will be a critical aspect of the Greengrid and will influence the views of those who live and work in the area, as well as those passing through or considering investing.
  • Sea Wall Biodiversity Handbook by Tim Gardiner, Rob Pilcher and Max Wade

    Sea Wall Biodiversity Handbook by Tim Gardiner, Rob Pilcher and Max Wade

    Sea Wall Biodiversity Handbook Sea Wall Tim Gardiner, Biodiversity Officer at the Environment Agency, Rob Pilcher, Ecology Team Leader for North West England at AECOM and Max Wade, Technical Director (Ecology) at AECOM, have a long standing interest in the ecology and management of sea wall habitats. Their handbook on sea wall biodiversity brings together a wealth of knowledge about this Cinderella habitat based on the authors’ experience of practical management and the flora and fauna of sea walls. The handbook highlights the breadth of plant and animal species living and relying on sea walls and provides practical guidance for managers of sea defences to ensure that their biodiversity value is by conserved and enhanced. Tim Gardiner, Rob Pilcher and Max Wade Rob Pilcher Gardiner, Tim Sea Wall Biodiversity Handbook by Tim Gardiner, Rob Pilcher and Max Wade SeaWall Layout Cvr v1.indd 1 02/09/2015 15:09 SeaWall Layout Txt.indd 4 20/08/2015 15:57 Sea Wall Biodiversity Handbook Sea Wall Biodiversity Handbook by Tim Gardiner, Rob Pilcher & Max Wade © Copyright First published in 2015 by RPS Images are the authors unless labelled. Designed and Printed by Mimeo Limited Units 1-3, The Ermine Centre, Hurricane Close, Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire PE29 6XX. A CIP record is available from the British Lending Library in London. ISBN: 978-0-9546600-4-8 Citation; Gardiner, T., Pilcher, R. & Wade, M. (2015) Sea Wall Biodiversity Handbook. RPS. SeaWall Layout Txt.indd 3 20/08/2015 15:57 SeaWall Layout Txt.indd 4 20/08/2015 15:57 Sea Wall Biodiversity Handbook Acknowledgements Thanks go to those involved with preparation of the case studies, to site managers and their respective organisations for allowing data to be used and for reviewing draft text of the case studies.
  • Essex Coast Recreational Disturbance Avoidance & Mitigation

    Essex Coast Recreational Disturbance Avoidance & Mitigation

    Essex Coast Recreational disturbance Avoidance & Mitigation Strategy (RAMS) Habitats Regulations Assessment Strategy document 2018-2038 Contents Executive Summary 1 Introduction 1 2 Background to the Strategy 11 3 Purpose of the Strategy 25 The Technical Report – Evidence Base 28 4 The Baseline 28 5 Housing planned in the Zones of Influence 38 6 Exploring mitigation options 41 The Mitigation Report 55 7 Overview of Essex Coast RAMS Mitigation Options 55 8 Costed Mitigation Package and Mitigation Delivery 61 9 Monitoring and Review 70 10 Conclusions and next steps 73 11 Abbreviations/Glossary 74 List of Tables Table 1.1: Habitats Sites in Essex relevant to the Strategy Table 1.2: Effects of recreational disturbance on non-breeding SPA birds Table 2.1 LPAs and their relevant Habitats Sites Table 2.2: Options for preparing Essex Coast RAMS Table 2.3: Brief for the Essex Coast RAMS Brief Table 3.1: Planning Use Classes Table 4.1: North Essex visitor survey details Table 4.2: South Essex visitor surveys required to identify impacts on the designated features Table 4.3: Designation features per Habitats site (MAGIC, 2018) and visitor surveys undertaken to assess disturbance Table 4.4: ZOI calculations for Essex Coast Habitats sites Table 5.1: Housing to be delivered in the Essex coast RAMS overall ZoI Table 6.1: Potential for disturbance to birds in Stour Estuary (Essex side only) Table 6.2: Potential for disturbance of birds in Hamford Water Table 6.3: Potential for disturbance to birds and mitigation options in Colne Estuary (including Essex
  • Baseline Document for Maintenance Dredging

    Baseline Document for Maintenance Dredging

    Port of London Authority: Baseline Document for Maintenance Dredging Port of London Authority June 2007 Final Report 9R6602 A COMPANY OF HASKONING UK LTD ENVIRONMENT Burns House Harlands Road Haywards Heath, West Sussex RH16 1PG United Kingdom +44 (0)1444 458551 Telephone Fax [email protected] E-mail www.royalhaskoning.com Internet Document title Port of London Authority: Baseline Document for Maintenance Dredging Status Final Report Date June 2007 Project name Baseline Document for Maintenance Dredging Project number 9R6602 Client Port of London Authority Reference 9R6602/R//Hayw Drafted by Angela Nicholson and Dr Nicola Meakins Checked by Nicola White Date/initials check …………………. …………………. Approved by Daniel Leggett Date/initials approval …………………. …………………. CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Context and Scope of the Baseline Document 2 1.3 Objectives 5 1.4 Methodology 6 1.5 Report structure 6 2 EXISTING DREDGING REGIME 7 2.1 Overview of Activity 7 2.2 Summary of Dredging Operations 7 2.3 Water Injection Maintenance Dredging Operations 9 2.4 Trailer or TSHD Maintenance Dredging Operations 14 2.5 Historic dredging 17 2.6 Other dredging activities 18 3 BENFLEET AND SOUTHEND MARSHES SPA AND RAMSAR SITE 20 3.1 Overview 20 3.2 Conservation objectives 20 3.3 Current conservation status 21 4 THAMES ESTUARY AND MARSHES SPA AND RAMSAR SITE 26 4.1 Overview 26 4.2 Conservation objectives 27 4.3 Current conservation status 28 5 HOLEHAVEN CREEK SITE OF SPECIAL SCIENTIFIC INTEREST 35 5.1 Overview 35 5.2 Current
  • SOUTH ESSEX F T, ! 7

    SOUTH ESSEX F T, ! 7

    :: ; i f - SOUTH ESSEX f T, ! 7. CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSULTATION REPORT ‘I V / • W ISlEOt GI 'A1MOUTH * mEtiotouot < • M U C H IOWRTOH. • umtmc • Etf • HUNT1NGOON 1 • IE W O M ) \ IfSW KM NRA . M U 'O N KEYHEj ; 'UtWICH COICHESIEI* National Rivers Authority V CUC TOH OK SEA (HELMSEOIO Anglian Region IBILLERICA* ^ g Jj»«H A M OM«ctoucH t JW UNW '»ju(|THENOOtl su NOVEMBER 1995 CATCHMENT KEY DETAILS GENERAL Land Area 1841.54 km2 Groundwater WATER Population 1990 678,000 N o additional water available RESOURCES Projected to year 2001 694,000 Surface Water Main Towns and Populations N o additional summer water. Limited winter Southend-on-Sea water availaBle suBject to cessation (Municipal Borough) 167,200 conditions to safeguard the water Canvey Island 35,600 environment and other w’ater users. Basildon (Municipal Borough) 96,400 Stanford-le Hope/Benfleet/ PuBlic Water Supply ABstractions Hadleigh/Thundersley 49,600 Essex & Suffolk Water: There are two Chalk Corringham 32,300 puBlic water supply aBstractions in the Grays 48,100 catchment. These are located at Linford and Rayleigh 28,000 Stifford, and are licensed to aBstract 3728 (Data from Essex County Council, Planning Department) M l/a(l M l/a= 1 million litres) ADMINISTRATIVE County Council: Length of Designated Main River FLOOD DEFENCE DETAILS Essex Fluvial 313.6 km Tidal 101.4 km Borough/District Councils: Length of Main River EmBankment Basildon Brentwood Fluvial 4.5 km Castle Point Chelmsford Length of NRA Tidal Defences 145.4 km Maldon Rochford Area at risk from tidal flooding 97.5 km2 Southend-on-Sea Thurrock Area at risk from fluvial flooding 27.1 knr Unitary Authority: The Anglian Region of the NRA has no NAVIGATION London Borough of Havering statutory Navigation responsiBility within this plan area.
  • Habitat Mapping Report Phase 9 (2016-2021)

    Habitat Mapping Report Phase 9 (2016-2021)

    Anglian Coastal Monitoring Programme Phase 9 (2016 – 2021) Habitat Mapping Project Report: RP049/A/2018 Project: PM_1761 Report version 1.0 March 2018 Version Date Contributor Version_1.0 31/03/2018 Geomatics Crispin Hambidge David White Emma Taylor Isobel Moberly Sally Crudge Lucy North James Ford Authored by: Geomatics Environment Agency Horizon House, Deanery Road, Bristol BS1 5AH Email: [email protected] www.gov.uk/environment-agency © Environment Agency 2018 All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. PM_1761: Anglian Coastal Monitoring Programme Habitat Mapping 2 of 113 Contents 1. Introduction (lead author Environment Agency) .................................................................... 5 Key Aims and Objectives ............................................................................................................. 5 Outputs ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Extent and Location ..................................................................................................................... 6 Overview map............................................................................................................................................................. 6 List of habitat classes mapped .................................................................................................... 7 Shoreline Management Plan Areas ..........................................................................................