DOCSLIB.ORG

Coverage of Designated Sites in England by BTO Bird Monitoring Schemes: a Review to 2005

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Coverage of Designated Sites in England by BTO Bird Monitoring Schemes: a Review to 2005 BTO Research Report 429 Coverage of designated sites in England by BTO bird monitoring schemes: a review to 2005 Authors G.J. Conway, H.Q.P. Crick, R.J. Fuller, M. Handschuh, I.M.D. Maclean, J.H. Marchant, A.J. Musgrove, S.E. Newson, D.G. Noble, M.M. Rehfisch & R.M. Thewlis A report to English Nature January 2006 © British Trust for Ornithology and English Nature British Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk, IP24 2PU Registered Charity No. 216652 CONTENTS Page No. List of Tables ....................................................................................................................................... 3 List of Figures...................................................................................................................................... 3 List of Appendices............................................................................................................................... 3 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 The concept of Common Standards Monitoring................................................................. 5 1.2 Common Standards Monitoring of English ornithological sites........................................ 5 1.3 The objectives of this report.................................................................................................. 7 2 HOW THIS REVIEW HAS BEEN CONDUCTED ........................................................... 9 2.1 Wetland Bird Survey ............................................................................................................. 9 2.2 Breeding Waders of Wet Meadows (BWWM) .................................................................. 10 2.3 Heronries Census ................................................................................................................. 11 2.4 Woodlark, Nightjar, Dartford Warbler and Peregrine surveys...................................... 11 2.5 BTO Register of Ornithological Sites................................................................................. 12 3 APPROACHES TO MONITORING THE QUALITY OF BREEDING BIRD ASSEMBLAGES AT SSSIs ................................................................................................ 13 3.1 Background .......................................................................................................................... 13 3.2 Requirements ....................................................................................................................... 14 3.3 Can existing schemes provide sufficient data?.................................................................. 14 3.3.1 BTO/JNCC/RSPB Breeding Bird Survey........................................................... 15 3.3.2 BTO/RSPB/BWI BirdTrack ................................................................................ 15 3.3.3 BTO/WWT/RSPB/JNCC Wetland Bird Survey................................................ 15 3.3.4 BTO/EN/RSPB Breeding Waders of Wet Meadows.......................................... 16 3.3.5 Single species surveys (SCARABBS) .................................................................. 16 3.3.6 Atlas projects......................................................................................................... 16 3.3.7 Rare Breeding Birds Panel .................................................................................. 16 3.3.8 Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 16 3.4 A suggested approach to assembling lists of breeding species on SSSIs ......................... 17 3.5 Proposal for a pilot study in 2006....................................................................................... 18 3.5.1 Field study design for timed lists......................................................................... 19 3.5.2 Synthesising data from timed lists and supplementary sources ....................... 19 3.5.3 Assessing potential coverage................................................................................ 19 3.5.4 Some general issues............................................................................................... 20 3.6 Resource requirements........................................................................................................ 20 4 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS BY COUNTY AND BY SSSI............................................. 21 5 OVERVIEW OF FINDINGS............................................................................................ 107 5.1 Wetland Bird Survey findings .......................................................................................... 107 5.5.1 Issues surrounding WeBS Core Counts carried out at low tide..................... 109 5.2 Heronries Census findings ................................................................................................ 113 5.3 SCARABBS surveys .......................................................................................................... 113 5.4 Ringed Plover survey findings .......................................................................................... 114 5.5 Breeding Waders of Wet Meadows findings ................................................................... 114 BTO Research Report 429 1 January 2006 Page No. 6 PRIORITIES AND RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................. 115 6.1 Priorities and recommendations for waterbirds ............................................................. 115 6.1.1 Determining count area boundaries.................................................................. 116 6.1.2 Minor adjustments to count area boundaries .................................................. 116 6.1.3 Extension of geographic coverage ..................................................................... 116 6.1.4 Extension of temporal coverage......................................................................... 117 6.1.5 Sites not previously covered............................................................................... 117 6.1.6 Increasing volunteer or professional coverage................................................. 117 6.1.7 Specialist surveys and additional information for difficult species................ 120 6.1.8 Monitoring waterbirds during passage periods............................................... 122 6.2 Heronries Census ............................................................................................................... 122 6.3 Future National Peregrine Surveys.................................................................................. 123 6.4 Future SCARABBS surveys of heathland ....................................................................... 123 6.5 Future national Ringed Plover surveys............................................................................ 128 6.6 Future surveys of species and assemblages of wet habitats............................................ 128 Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................... 134 References........................................................................................................................................ 135 BTO Research Report 429 2 January 2006 List of Tables Page No. Table 1 Summary of coverage of sites differing in biological importance.......................... 107 Table 2 Summary of mean WeBS coverage of SSSIs by English Nature county ............... 108 Table 3 SSSIs for designated for waterbird features for which action is most urgently required..................................................................................................... 115 Table 4 The 57 SSSIs where WeBS coverage may be attained relatively easily using volunteer counters................................................................................................... 118 Table 5 The 29 SSSIs where WeBS coverage could perhaps be attained through volunteer counters................................................................................................... 119 Table 6 Summary of coverage and recommendations for heathland SSSIs, categorised hierarchically by designation type .......................................................................... 125 Table 7 Summary of coverage and recommendations for wet grassland SSSIs, categorised hierarchically by designation type ....................................................... 129 List of Figures Figure 1 The location of SSSIs designated for waterbirds in England.................................. 109 Figure 2 Breakdown of counts of WeBS coastal sections by state of tide............................ 110 List of Appendices Appendix 1 How to use the English SSSIs CSM database ........................................................ 137 Appendix 2 The GIS project file and how to use it .................................................................... 139 Appendix 3 Coverage, importance and priority for each SSSI for which waterbirds are a designated feature........................................................................................... 141 Appendix 4 Nationally and regionally important heronries ....................................................... 149 Appendix 5 Reports and other outputs from the BTO Register of Ornithological Sites ............ 155 BTO Research Report 429 3 January 2006 BTO Research Report 429 4 January 2006
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annex 7: Completed Workbook Trial for New Anglia
    Annex 7: Completed workbook trial for New Anglia RPA | Annexes Local Economic Development and the Environment (LEDE) workbook Local Economic Development and the Environment (LEDE) project researcher workbook April 2013 1 Local Economic Development and the Environment (LEDE) workbook Organizational details Name of LEP: New Anglia Lead responsible officer for LEP Name: Role: Address: Telephone number: Mobile telephone number: E-mail address: Researcher Name: Risk & Policy Analysts Ltd. Organization: Risk & Policy Analysts Ltd. Role: Address: Farthing Green House, 1 Beccles Rd, Loddon, Norfolk, NR14 6LT Telephone number: 01508 528465 Mobile telephone number: E-mail address: [email protected] 2 Local Economic Development and the Environment (LEDE) workbook Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................................. 3 1. One page initial summary ............................................................................................................... 7 1.1. The geographical area of the LEP ............................................................................................ 7 1.2. Description of the economy of the area ................................................................................. 7 1.3. Challenges faced by the economy .......................................................................................... 8 1.4. The plausible future development pathway ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Asterwildlife Wildfowl on the Lake Langley Country Park Beautiful, Tranquil and Historic with a Variety of Habitats for Wildlife and Year Round Activities for All
    Wildlife walks Berkshirein Our favourite five #AsterWildlife Wildfowl on the Lake Langley Country Park Beautiful, tranquil and historic with a variety of habitats for wildlife and year round activities for all. Buckinghamshire SL0 0LS Green flag Award Lilly Hill Park A green flag awarded, public open space with diverse habitats for birds, bats, insects, wild flowers, grasslands and trees. Bracknell RG12 2RX Flora & Fauna Englemere Pond A lovely Nature reserve on the doorstep, all sorts of flora and fauna to be seen throughout the year and great dog walking routes too. Ascot SL5 8BA Beautiful Bluebells Moor Copse Nature Reserve Peaceful, relaxing, and easy terrain leads up into beautiful Tidmarsh. A little off the beaten path but well worth a visit. Reading RG8 8HE Looking for Lizards Finchampstead Ridges If you walk slowly and quietly on a sunny day you may be lucky enough to spot a common lizard or slow worm basking in the warmth of the sun. Wokingham RG45 6AE Wildlife walks Cornwallin Our favourite five #AsterWildlife Good for Birdwatching Marazion Beach If you’re into bird spotting you’ll love it here plus you’ll find lots of like-minded people to chat to. Don’t forget your binoculars! Marazion TR17 0AA Seal Spotting Godrevy Natural beauty at its best. An easy walk, stunning views and stacks of wildlife. Share the beaches with the seals.......that’s how close to nature you are. South West Coast Path, Hayle TR27 5ED Perfect Ponds Tehidy Country Park For short or long walks, there’s something for everyone. The squirrels are friendly and the ponds have lots of geese, ducks and swans.
    [Show full text]
  • Fen Management Strategy - Explains the Role of the Strategy and Its Relationship to Other Documents
    CONTENTS Acknowledgements Purpose & use of the fen management strategy - explains the role of the strategy and its relationship to other documents Summary - outlines the need for a fen management strategy Introduction - Sets the picture of development and use of fens from their origins to present day Approach to producing strategy - Methodology to writing the fen management strategy Species requirements: This section provides a summary of our existing knowledge concerning birds, plants, mammals and invertebrates associated with the Broads fens. This information forms a basis for the fen management strategy. Vegetation resource Mammals Birds Invertebrates Summary of special features for each valley: This section mainly identifies the botanical features within each valley. The distribution of birds, mammals and invertebrates is either variable or unknown, and so has been covered only in a general sense in the section on species requirements. However, where there is obvious bird interest concentrated within particular valleys, this has been identified. The botanical section provides a summary analysis of the fen vegetation resource survey and considers the relative importance of fen vegetation in a local and national context. A summary of the chemical variables of the soils for each valley has also been included. Ant valley Bure valley Muckfleet valley Thurne valley Waveney valley Yare valley The fen resource for the future: Identifies aims and objectives to restore fens to favourable nature conservation state Environmental constraints and opportunities - Using the fen management strategy: - During the fen vegetation resource survey, chemical variables of the substratum associated with various plant communities were measured. The purpose of these measurements was to provide some indication of the importance of substrate to the plant communities.
    [Show full text]
  • NCA Profile:124 Pevensey Levels
    National Character 124. Pevensey Levels Area profile: Supporting documents www.naturalengland.org.uk 1 National Character 124. Pevensey Levels Area profile: Supporting documents Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment White Paper,1 Biodiversity 20202 and the European Landscape Convention,3 we are revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas North (NCAs). These are areas that share similar landscape characteristics, and which East follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision-making framework for the natural environment. Yorkshire & The North Humber NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform West their decision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The information they contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a East landscape scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage Midlands broader partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will West also help to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. Midlands East of Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features England that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each London area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental South East Opportunity (SEOs) are suggested, which draw on this integrated information. South West The SEOs offer guidance on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lake Lothing (Lowestoft) Third Crossing Order 201[*]
    Lake Lothing Third Crossing Chapter 11 of the Environmental Statement R2 - Clean SCC/LLTC/EX/70 The Lake Lothing (Lowestoft) Third Crossing Order 201[*] _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ Document SCC/LLTC/EX/70: Chapter 11 of the Environmental Statement R2 – Clean ________________________________________________________________________ Planning Act 2008 The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 PINS Reference Number: TR010023 Author: Suffolk County Council Document Reference: SCC/LLTC/EX/70 Date: 29 January 2019 Lake Lothing Third Crossing Chapter 11 of the Environmental Statement R2 - Clean SCC/LLTC/EX/70 This page is intentionally left blank Lake Lothing Third Crossing Chapter 11 of the Environmental Statement - tracked Document Reference: SCC/LLTCEX/27 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11 Nature Conservation Scope of the Assessments Introduction This updated chapter 11 of the Environmental Statement describes the assessment of the likely significant effects of the Scheme on biodiversity and nature conservation during the construction and operational. It is supported by Figures 11.1 to 11.7 (APP-150) and Appendices 11A to 11G (APP-183 to APP- 189). The assessment of this topic area considers potential impacts relating to the following aspects: • Statutory and non-statutory designated sites; • Important or protected habitats; and • Legally protected species and/or species of conservation importance. The assessment has incorporated the comments of the Secretary of State (SoS) presented in the Scoping Opinion included in Appendix 6B, as well as those received during the S42 consultation. The assessment should be read in conjunction with Chapter 8: Air Quality; Chapter 12: Geology and Soils, Chapter 13: Noise and Vibration, Chapter 17: Road Drainage and the Water Environment and Chapter 19: Traffic and Transport.
    [Show full text]
  • IDB Biodiversity Action Plan
    BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN April 2018 PEVENSEY AND CUCKMERE WLMB – BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN Front cover images (L-R) Kestrel ©Heather Smithers; Barn Owl; Floating Pennywort; Fen Raft Spider ©Charlie Jackson; Water Vole; Otter PEVENSEY AND CUCKMERE WLMB – BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN FOREWORD This Biodiversity Action Plan has been prepared by the Pevensey and Cuckmere Water Level Management Board in accordance with the commitment in the Implementation Plan of the DEFRA Internal Drainage Board Review for IDB’s, to produce their own Biodiversity Action Plans by April 2010. This aims to align this BAP with the Sussex Biodiversity Action Plan. The document also demonstrates the Board’s commitment to fulfilling its duty as a public body under the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006 to conserve biodiversity. Many of the Board’s activities have benefits and opportunities for biodiversity, not least its water level management and ditch maintenance work. It is hoped that this Biodiversity Action Plan will help the Board to maximise the biodiversity benefits from its activities and demonstrate its contribution to the Government’s UK Biodiversity Action Plan targets as part of the Biodiversity 2020 strategy. The Board has adopted the Biodiversity Action Plan as one of its policies and subject to available resources is committed to its implementation. It will review the plan periodically and update it as appropriate. Bill Gower Chairman of the Board PEVENSEY AND CUCKMERE WLMB – BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS & ACRONYMS 1 1
    [Show full text]
  • G Sites of Special Scientific Interest Screening Assessment
    WRMP19 SEA Environmental Report G Sites of Special Scientific Interest screening assessment SSSIs considered Water dependent sites Sites within 2 km of option located downstream of Option types that require new Option name Sites within 200 m of new reservoir abstraction or Screening narrative Screening decision reference built infrastructure (i.e., pipeline or repair/amendments discharge points, or groundwater, reservoir to existing pipelines supported by target aquifer and water treatment works for groundwater options) abstractions Catchment management CGW-2 Catchment Management N/A None N/A No adverse impacts from water quality improvement No significant impacts likely. Interventions at actions Woodgarston CGW-3 Targeted catchment N/A Pembury Cutting and Pit [all N/A No adverse impacts from water quality improvement No significant impacts likely. management units at favourable condition] actions interventions in the Pembury area Water reuse EFF-35 Effluent reuse to River Brighton to Newhaven Cliffs Brighton to Newhaven Cliffs Brighton to Newhaven Cliffs Proposed pipeline route runs adjacent to Lewes Brooks Measures to avoid significant effects on Lewes (plan Ouse: source – [100% of units at favourable or [100% of units at favourable [100% of units at favourable (no intersection with site) and in close proximity to Brooks and Brighton to Newhaven Cliffs SSSIs alternative Peacehaven (25Ml/d unfavourable – recovering or unfavourable – recovering or unfavourable – recovering Lewes Downs (minimum distance of approximately identified though SEA and recorded in option option) Option) condition] condition] condition] 200m), however no direct impacts and no drainage dossiers. For Lewes Downs this would include impacts anticipated. No significant effects likely either rerouting pipeline east of existing route via Lewes Brooks [93.6% of units at Lewes Brooks [93.6% of following implementation of standard mitigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Action Plan
    BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN April 2018 BROADS IDB – BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN Front cover images (L-R) Marsh Harrier ©Artur Rydzewski; Norfolk Hawker © Milo Bostock; Water Soldier; Water Vole; Berney Marshes ©Mike Page; BIDB Digger BROADS IDB – BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN FOREWORD This Biodiversity Action Plan (Second Edition) has been prepared by the Broads Internal Drainage Board in accordance with the commitment in the Implementation Plan of the DEFRA Internal Drainage Board Review for IDB’s, to produce their own Biodiversity Action Plans by April 2010. As such, the original version was published in January 2010. This revised version aims to continue to align the Broads IDB with biodiversity policy and more specifically, the Biodiversity document for England, “Biodiversity 2020: A strategy for Englands’ Wildlife and Ecosystem Services” and build on the Government’s 25 Year Environmental Plan; A Green Future. In doing so, the document strives to demonstrate the Board’s commitment to fulfilling its duty as a public body under the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006 to conserve biodiversity. Many of the Board’s activities have benefits and opportunities for biodiversity, not least its water level management and watercourse maintenance work. It is hoped that this Biodiversity Action Plan will help the Board to maximise the biodiversity benefits from its activities and demonstrate its contribution to the targets as part of the Biodiversity 2020 strategy and achieve wider environmental improvement within its catchments. The Board has adopted the Biodiversity Action Plan as one of its policies and subject to available resources is committed to its implementation. It will review the plan periodically and update it as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment: Draft Scoping Report
    North Norfolk 2016 - 2036 HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT Draft Scoping Report May 2017 North Norfolk District Council Planning Policy Team Telephone: 01263 516318 E-Mail: [email protected] Write to: Planning Policy Manager, North Norfolk District Council, Holt Road, Cromer, NR27 9EN www.north-norfolk.gov.uk/localplan All documents can be made available in Braille, audio, large print or in other languages. Please contact 01263 516318 to discuss your requirements. Draft HRA Scoping - North Norfolk District Council – Emerging Local Plan Executive Summary Habitats Regulations Assessment is required in accordance with the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010, (amended 2012); in order to ensure that plans and projects do not have a likely significant effect on any European designated sites for nature conservation. Such plans or projects can only proceed if the competent authority is convinced they will not have an “adverse effect on the integrity of a European site”. Where there is uncertainty over the effects then the competent authority will need to demonstrate how these can be avoided and what mitigation can be put in place. A Local Plan is the subject of Habitats Regulations Assessment, which is the responsibility of the plan-making body (in this case North Norfolk District Council) to produce. This scoping report provides the background and review of evidence to support the commencement of screening and the final Habitats Regulations Assessment of the North Norfolk Core Strategy and Site Allocations documents. This report considers: • The European designated sites within and outside the plan area affected. • The characteristics of these sites and their conservation objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • 19 Duncton to Bignor Escarpment SAC
    Submitted to Client: Submitted by: South Downs National Park AECOM Authority Midpoint Alençon Link Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 7PP United Kingdom South Downs National Park Authority Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment July 2018 AECOM South Downs National Park Authority Page ii Prepared by: Isla Hoffmann Heap Checked by: Dr James Riley Senior Ecologist Technical Director Approved by: Dr James Riley Associate Director Rev No Comments Checked Approved Date by by 0 DRAFT IHH JR 05/05/17 1 Following client comments IHH JR 30/06/17 2 Incorporating air quality impact assessment IHH JR 01/08/17 3 Updated to address Pre-Submission Local Plan and IHH JR 13/09/17 incorporate air quality analysis for Ashdown Forest SAC 4 Update to reflect Consultation Comments and policy update IHH JR 16/03/18 5 New report produced in response to Sweetman European MK JR 24/07/18 Court of Justice ruling Midpoint, Alençon Link, Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG21 7PP, United Kingdom Telephone: 01256 310 200 Website: http://www.aecom.com July 2018 Limitations South Downs National Park Authority Local Plan Habitats Regulations July 2018 Assessment AECOM South Downs National Park Authority Page iii AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of the South Downs National Park Authority (“Client”) in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by AECOM. This Report is confidential and may not be disclosed by the Client nor relied upon by any other party without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM.
    [Show full text]
  • Desktop Biodiversity Report
    Desktop Biodiversity Report Land at Balcombe Parish ESD/14/747 Prepared for Katherine Daniel (Balcombe Parish Council) 13th February 2014 This report is not to be passed on to third parties without prior permission of the Sussex Biodiversity Record Centre. Please be aware that printing maps from this report requires an appropriate OS licence. Sussex Biodiversity Record Centre report regarding land at Balcombe Parish 13/02/2014 Prepared for Katherine Daniel Balcombe Parish Council ESD/14/74 The following information is included in this report: Maps Sussex Protected Species Register Sussex Bat Inventory Sussex Bird Inventory UK BAP Species Inventory Sussex Rare Species Inventory Sussex Invasive Alien Species Full Species List Environmental Survey Directory SNCI M12 - Sedgy & Scott's Gills; M22 - Balcombe Lake & associated woodlands; M35 - Balcombe Marsh; M39 - Balcombe Estate Rocks; M40 - Ardingly Reservior & Loder Valley Nature Reserve; M42 - Rowhill & Station Pastures. SSSI Worth Forest. Other Designations/Ownership Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty; Environmental Stewardship Agreement; Local Nature Reserve; National Trust Property. Habitats Ancient tree; Ancient woodland; Ghyll woodland; Lowland calcareous grassland; Lowland fen; Lowland heathland; Traditional orchard. Important information regarding this report It must not be assumed that this report contains the definitive species information for the site concerned. The species data held by the Sussex Biodiversity Record Centre (SxBRC) is collated from the biological recording community in Sussex. However, there are many areas of Sussex where the records held are limited, either spatially or taxonomically. A desktop biodiversity report from SxBRC will give the user a clear indication of what biological recording has taken place within the area of their enquiry.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 4: Details of Natura 2000 Sites Contents
    Contents Appendix 4 1 Data sources 4 2 Allendale Moors 5 3 Alston Shingle Banks 11 4 Appleby Fells 13 5 Arkengarthdael, Gunnerside and Rees Moors 32 6 Arkle Beck Meadows 38 7 Bowes Moor 40 8 Bowlees & Friar House Meadows 46 9 Castle Eden Dene 48 10 Catton Lea Meadow 50 11 Cornriggs Meadow 52 12 Cotherstone Moor 54 13 Cowpen Marsh 60 14 Durham Coast 62 15 Far High House Meadows 65 16 Fothering Holme 67 17 Gingerfields 69 18 Grains O' th' Beck Meadows 71 19 Haggs Bank 73 20 Hannah's Meadows 75 21 Harkers House Meadows 77 Appendix 4: Details of Natura 2000 Sites Contents 22 Helbeck Wood 79 23 Hexhamshire Moors 81 24 Low Redford Meadows 87 25 Lune Forest 89 26 Mallerstang - Swaledale Head 98 27 Mere Beck Meadows 109 28 Middle Crossthwaite 111 29 Middle Side & Stonygill Meadows 113 30 Moorhouse and Cross Fell 115 31 Muggleswick, Stanhope, Edmundbyers Commons & Blanchland Moors 133 32 Ninebanks River Shingle 139 33 Peckriding Meadows 141 34 Rigg Farm and Stake Hill Meadows 143 35 River Eden & Tributaries 145 36 River Nent at Blagill 159 37 Seal Sands 161 38 Seaton Dunes & Common 175 39 South Gare & Coatham Sands 177 40 Swindale Wood 179 41 Tees & Hartlepool Foreshore 182 42 Thrislington Plantation 184 43 Upper Teesdale 186 Appendix 4: Details of Natura 2000 Sites Contents 44 West Newlandside Meadows 210 45 West Park Meadows 212 46 White Ridge Meadow 214 47 Whitfield Moor, Plenmeller and Ashholme Commons 217 48 Williamston River Shingle 224 49 Northumbria Coast EMS 226 50 Teesmouth & Cleveland Coast EMS 233 51 North Pennine Moors SPA 241 52 Northumbria Coast SPA (Durham Coast SSSI) 249 53 Teesmouth & Cleveland Coast SPA 254 Appendix 4: Details of Natura 2000 Sites 1 Data sources 1.1 Data sources and explanations: "Site Name and Designation" is accompanied by site-specific information on vulnerability taken from the relevant JNCC SAC / SPA data forms.
    [Show full text]