DOCSLIB.ORG

G Sites of Special Scientific Interest Screening Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
G Sites of Special Scientific Interest Screening Assessment WRMP19 SEA Environmental Report G Sites of Special Scientific Interest screening assessment SSSIs considered Water dependent sites Sites within 2 km of option located downstream of Option types that require new Option name Sites within 200 m of new reservoir abstraction or Screening narrative Screening decision reference built infrastructure (i.e., pipeline or repair/amendments discharge points, or groundwater, reservoir to existing pipelines supported by target aquifer and water treatment works for groundwater options) abstractions Catchment management CGW-2 Catchment Management N/A None N/A No adverse impacts from water quality improvement No significant impacts likely. Interventions at actions Woodgarston CGW-3 Targeted catchment N/A Pembury Cutting and Pit [all N/A No adverse impacts from water quality improvement No significant impacts likely. management units at favourable condition] actions interventions in the Pembury area Water reuse EFF-35 Effluent reuse to River Brighton to Newhaven Cliffs Brighton to Newhaven Cliffs Brighton to Newhaven Cliffs Proposed pipeline route runs adjacent to Lewes Brooks Measures to avoid significant effects on Lewes (plan Ouse: source – [100% of units at favourable or [100% of units at favourable [100% of units at favourable (no intersection with site) and in close proximity to Brooks and Brighton to Newhaven Cliffs SSSIs alternative Peacehaven (25Ml/d unfavourable – recovering or unfavourable – recovering or unfavourable – recovering Lewes Downs (minimum distance of approximately identified though SEA and recorded in option option) Option) condition] condition] condition] 200m), however no direct impacts and no drainage dossiers. For Lewes Downs this would include impacts anticipated. No significant effects likely either rerouting pipeline east of existing route via Lewes Brooks [93.6% of units at Lewes Brooks [93.6% of following implementation of standard mitigation. the South Downs Way, or potentially the use of favourable or unfavourable – units at favourable or directional drilling to avoid the site.For Brighton recovering condition, 6.5 % at5 unfavourable – recovering Potential significant adverse effect on notified features to Newhaven Cliffs this could include careful unfavourable – declining] condition, 6.5 % at (Kittiwake colonies) and supporting habitat (chalk cliff) timing of construction works and site specific unfavourable – declining] of Brighton to Newhaven Cliffs due to construction measures to ensure no damage to structural Lewes Downs [100% of units at disturbance (pipeline routed approximately 30m from integrity of chalk cliffs. favourable or unfavourable- Lewes Downs [100% of units site at closest point). recovering condition] at favourable or unfavourable-recovering Notified features of Plashett Park Wood sensitive to condition] changes in water quality/availability, however site is not influenced by the Ouse, hence no significant effects Plashett Park Wood [100% of likely. units at favourable or unfavourable-recovering condition] New groundwater abstraction PAGE 1 WRMP19 SEA Environmental Report SSSIs considered Water dependent sites Sites within 2 km of option located downstream of Option types that require new Option name Sites within 200 m of new reservoir abstraction or Screening narrative Screening decision reference built infrastructure (i.e., pipeline or repair/amendments discharge points, or groundwater, reservoir to existing pipelines supported by target aquifer and water treatment works for groundwater options) abstractions NGW-44 Aylesford Newsprint - None Aylesford Pit [all units at Peter’s Pit [all units at Option involves continuation of use of existing No significant effect likely. use of existing unfavourable – declining] favourable condition] groundwater abstraction, and at lower rate of groundwater sources abstraction – no significant effects likely. Holborough to Burham Holborough to Burham Marshes [all units at Marshes [all units at favourable condition] favourable condition] Medway Estuary and Marshes [54% of units at unfavourable-recovering condition, 0.2% at unfavourable – no change, and 46 % at unfavourable- - declining] Surface water RES-24 New Arlington Reservoir, Arlington Reservoir [100% of units Arlington Reservoir [100% of Lewes Downs [100% of units Potential significant adverse impacts from construction Measures to avoid significant effects on Arlington R. Ouse - 26m AOD - at favourable condition] units at favourable condition] at favourable or of new reservoir on Arlington Reserir associated with Reservoir SSSI identified though SEA and 3,900Ml unfavourable-recovering disturbance to over wintering and migrating birds recorded in option dossier. These would include Milton Gate Marsh [76.3% at condition] which, without mitigation, could reduce populations ensuring reservoir design provides valuable new favourable or unfavourable- below target level (50% of existing population, and habitat, careful timing of construction activities to recovering condition, 23.8% Lewes Brooks [93.6% of reduction of >25 % respectively)Pipeline installation minimise disturbance to overwintering and at unfavourable-declining] units at favourable or could also result in the loss of habitats identified in migratory bird populations and further refinement unfavourable – recovering conservation objectives for the site (fen, marsh, to the pipeline routing to make use of existing condition, 6.5 % at swamp). metalled tracked within the site where possible or unfavourable – declining] use of directional drilling. Further detailed habitat There would be no direct impacts on Milton Gate Marsh and species surveys would be required to inform Offham Marshes [all units at during construction or operation, and standard detailed reservoir design and determine detailed favourable or unfavourable- surveys and construction practice can avoid impacts on mitigation and enhancement opportunities. recovering status] this site. Firle Escarpment [96.3% of Notified features of Offham Marshes, Lewes Brooks units at favourable or and Lewes Downs are sensitive to changes in water unfavourable -recovering level and quality. This option proposes to abstract condition] under high water flows only and the Ouse is tidal below the proposed abstraction point at Barcombe, therefore no likely significant adverse effects on Offham Marshes (located approximately 6.5 km downstream of the abstraction point) are anticipated. Lewes Brooks and Lewes Downs are not influenced by the Medway, hence no significant impacts anticipated. PAGE 2 WRMP19 SEA Environmental Report SSSIs considered Water dependent sites Sites within 2 km of option located downstream of Option types that require new Option name Sites within 200 m of new reservoir abstraction or Screening narrative Screening decision reference built infrastructure (i.e., pipeline or repair/amendments discharge points, or groundwater, reservoir to existing pipelines supported by target aquifer and water treatment works for groundwater options) abstractions Notified features of Firle Escarpment not sensitive to changes to water quality or quantity – no pathway of impact. RES-27 Goose Green Reservoir None None Beeding Hill to Newtimber Notified features of Beeding Hill to Newtimber Hill are No significant effects likely (plan - 30mAOD - 7,200Ml Hill [all units at favourable or sensitive to changes in water quality and quantity and alternative unfavourable-recovering channel morphology, but are not influenced by the Adur option) status] and hence no significant effects are anticipated. Adur Estuary [all units at Notified features of Adur Estuary are sensitive to favourable or unfavourable- changes in water quality and quantity and channel recovering status] morphology. However, given the distance between the abstraction point at Wineham and the site (located approximately 16 km downstream) and the fact that the notified features of the Adur Estuary are mainly influenced by the saline/estuarine conditions at the mouth of the Adur estuary, no significant effects are considered likely. RES-31 Broad Oak Reservoir - West Blean and Thorndean Sturry Pit [100% of units at Stodmarsh SSSI [82.3% of Potential significant adverse impacts on West Blean Measures to avoid significant effects on West 36m AOD - 5,126 Ml Woods [90.6% of units at favourable condition] units at favourable or and Thornden Woods from construction which could Blean and Thornden Woods identified though favourable or unfavourable- unfavourable-recovering result in loss of ancient woodland, woodland and open SEA and recorded in option dossiers. These recovering condition, 3.1% at West Blean and Thornden condition, 17.7% at space in the areas adjacent to the SSSI with would include ensuring the reservoir design unfavourable-no change, 6.3% at Woods [90.6% of units at unfavourable-no change] subsequent impacts on connectivity. Habitat loss in provides new habitat for overwintering birds and unfavourable-declining] favourable or unfavourable- surrounding areas could indirectly affect breeding bird, further habitat and species studies to influence recovering condition, 3.1% Sandwich Bay to Hacklinge invertebrate assemblages and heath fritillary detailed mitigation and enhancement East Blean Woods [100% of units at unfavourable-no change, Marshes SSSI [96.5 % of populations within the SSSI. Reservoir design has been opportunities. at favourable or unfavourable- 6.3% at unfavourable- units at favourable or modified to avoid direct loss of SSSI and significant recovering condition] declining] unfavourable
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Asterwildlife Wildfowl on the Lake Langley Country Park Beautiful, Tranquil and Historic with a Variety of Habitats for Wildlife and Year Round Activities for All
    Wildlife walks Berkshirein Our favourite five #AsterWildlife Wildfowl on the Lake Langley Country Park Beautiful, tranquil and historic with a variety of habitats for wildlife and year round activities for all. Buckinghamshire SL0 0LS Green flag Award Lilly Hill Park A green flag awarded, public open space with diverse habitats for birds, bats, insects, wild flowers, grasslands and trees. Bracknell RG12 2RX Flora & Fauna Englemere Pond A lovely Nature reserve on the doorstep, all sorts of flora and fauna to be seen throughout the year and great dog walking routes too. Ascot SL5 8BA Beautiful Bluebells Moor Copse Nature Reserve Peaceful, relaxing, and easy terrain leads up into beautiful Tidmarsh. A little off the beaten path but well worth a visit. Reading RG8 8HE Looking for Lizards Finchampstead Ridges If you walk slowly and quietly on a sunny day you may be lucky enough to spot a common lizard or slow worm basking in the warmth of the sun. Wokingham RG45 6AE Wildlife walks Cornwallin Our favourite five #AsterWildlife Good for Birdwatching Marazion Beach If you’re into bird spotting you’ll love it here plus you’ll find lots of like-minded people to chat to. Don’t forget your binoculars! Marazion TR17 0AA Seal Spotting Godrevy Natural beauty at its best. An easy walk, stunning views and stacks of wildlife. Share the beaches with the seals.......that’s how close to nature you are. South West Coast Path, Hayle TR27 5ED Perfect Ponds Tehidy Country Park For short or long walks, there’s something for everyone. The squirrels are friendly and the ponds have lots of geese, ducks and swans.
    [Show full text]
  • NCA Profile:124 Pevensey Levels
    National Character 124. Pevensey Levels Area profile: Supporting documents www.naturalengland.org.uk 1 National Character 124. Pevensey Levels Area profile: Supporting documents Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment White Paper,1 Biodiversity 20202 and the European Landscape Convention,3 we are revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas North (NCAs). These are areas that share similar landscape characteristics, and which East follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision-making framework for the natural environment. Yorkshire & The North Humber NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform West their decision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The information they contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a East landscape scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage Midlands broader partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will West also help to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. Midlands East of Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features England that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each London area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental South East Opportunity (SEOs) are suggested, which draw on this integrated information. South West The SEOs offer guidance on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix L: SSSI Assessment (Site of Special Scientific Interest Source Pathway Receptor Analysis for Drought Permit Options)
    Our Dry Weather Plan South East Water’s 2021 draft drought plan Appendix L: SSSI Assessment (site of special scientific interest source pathway receptor analysis for drought permit options) March 2021 South East Water Rocfort Road Snodland Kent ME6 5AH Drought Plan | March 2021 Contents 1.1 Groundwater drought permits - site of special scientific interest source pathway receptor analysis 3 1.1.1 Halling No. 8 - site of special scientific interest source pathway receptor analysis 3 1.1.2 Balcombe- site of special scientific interest source pathway receptor analysis 5 1.1.3 Tangier / Chasewood - site of special scientific interest source pathway receptor analysis 6 1.1.4 Southlands / Oaklands - site of special scientific interest source pathway receptor analysis 8 1.1.5 Hackenden - site of special scientific interest source pathway receptor analysis 10 1.2 Surface water - Site of special scientific interest source pathway receptor analysis 11 1.2.1 RIVER OUSE Drought Plan - SSSI Source Pathway Receptor Analysis 2020 11 1.2.2 RIVER CUCKMERE - site of special scientific interest source pathway receptor analysis 14 Annex – Assessment of the hydrological links between the River Cuckmere and the West Dean Brooks. 19 2 Drought Plan | March 2021 1.1 Groundwater drought permits - site of special scientific interest source pathway receptor analysis In support of the assessment of potential effects associated with the drought permit it has been assumed that: • All appropriate infrastructure is in place at the source • Pump testing will have been undertaken and used to confirm the extent of any surface water drawdown and inform the need to re- scope this assessment with respect to potential groundwater effects • Abstracted water meets all quality criteria associated with both Environment Agency consenting requirements and requirements for potable supply • All abstracted water is transferred to supply via existing pipe works 1.1.1 Halling No.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Appraisal of Land to the South of Copyhold Cottages, Wilbees Farm, Arlington
    Ecological Appraisal of Land to the South of Copyhold Cottages, Wilbees Farm, Arlington Carried out by Dr. Colin C.D. Tingle FRES, Environmental Impact Ecologist, and L. Louise Holloway, Restoration Ecologist Contents Summary .............................................................................................................................. 5 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 8 Planning Policy Background.................................................................................................. 9 National Planning Policy Framework ................................................................................. 9 Policy WCS12: Biodiversity ............................................................................................. 10 Policy WCS13: Green Infrastructure ................................................................................ 10 Local Landscape Character Assessment ............................................................................ 11 The Low Wealden Landscape ......................................................................................... 11 Site Description ................................................................................................................... 13 Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 15 Current Status of Site .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • IDB Biodiversity Action Plan
    BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN April 2018 PEVENSEY AND CUCKMERE WLMB – BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN Front cover images (L-R) Kestrel ©Heather Smithers; Barn Owl; Floating Pennywort; Fen Raft Spider ©Charlie Jackson; Water Vole; Otter PEVENSEY AND CUCKMERE WLMB – BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN FOREWORD This Biodiversity Action Plan has been prepared by the Pevensey and Cuckmere Water Level Management Board in accordance with the commitment in the Implementation Plan of the DEFRA Internal Drainage Board Review for IDB’s, to produce their own Biodiversity Action Plans by April 2010. This aims to align this BAP with the Sussex Biodiversity Action Plan. The document also demonstrates the Board’s commitment to fulfilling its duty as a public body under the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006 to conserve biodiversity. Many of the Board’s activities have benefits and opportunities for biodiversity, not least its water level management and ditch maintenance work. It is hoped that this Biodiversity Action Plan will help the Board to maximise the biodiversity benefits from its activities and demonstrate its contribution to the Government’s UK Biodiversity Action Plan targets as part of the Biodiversity 2020 strategy. The Board has adopted the Biodiversity Action Plan as one of its policies and subject to available resources is committed to its implementation. It will review the plan periodically and update it as appropriate. Bill Gower Chairman of the Board PEVENSEY AND CUCKMERE WLMB – BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS & ACRONYMS 1 1
    [Show full text]
  • Working with Others to Restore Wilder Landscapes
    Working with others to restore Wilder landscapes Annual Report of the Wilder Landscapes Project April 2019 – March 2020 F Southgate 0 Contents Introduction 2 Summary of Project Achievements 2019 - 2020 3 Our Work Advising Landowners 4 Catchment & Landscape Scale Work 7 Policy Work & Strategic Advice 19 Linking People and Landscapes 20 Our Volunteers 26 Finance and Fundraising 27 Appendix 30 1 Introduction Sussex Wildlife Trust’s (SWT) Wilder Landscapes project supports local communities to restore wildlife-rich landscapes and the essential natural services that we all need for health and wellbeing. We help to deliver Nature Recover Networks, Natural Flood Management, Climate resilience and Wilding as well as caring for Sussex Wildlife Trust Nature Reserves, and supporting a multitude of other landowners, stakeholders and projects across Sussex. Our Wilder Landscapes projects have been delivering landscape scale conservation for over 19 years. We have also been running an innovative Natural Flood Management project, Sussex Flow Initiative, for over 8 years. With Climate change and biodiversity loss two of the biggest natural crises that we have faced in recorded history, now is the time to take as much positive and practical action that we can. Neither people, nor wildlife can survive without the essential services that our countryside provides including water purification, flood storage, carbon storage, food provision, access to nature health benefits, pollination services and more. We focus on creating community, climate and nature resilience through adaptation, collaboration and innovation. This year we have achieved some fantastic things with the help of local communities and our project partners. We have given wildlife advice on over 22,000 acres of land, for at least 84 unique landowners, and easily reached at least 2,000,000 people through our joint events, media and partnership working.
    [Show full text]
  • North Bexhill
    Report 1 NORTH BEXHILL LANDSCAPE AND ECOLOGICAL STUDY August 2015 Date: Prepared by: Authorised by: File reference: Report 1 First Issue 17.08.2015 RR/CA/SE/SH CS/RR/CA CSA/2572/02 North Bexhill Landscape and Ecological Study Issue Date: August2015 Rev A Doc Ref: CSA/2572/02 Rev B Prepared on behalf of Rother District Council by CSa Environmental Planning. All mapping included in this document has been reproduced from, or is based upon, This report is the copyright of Rother District Council and is for the Ordnance Survey map with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s the sole use of the person/organisation to whom it is addressed. It Stationery Office (HMSO). © Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes may not be used or referred to in whole or in part by anyone else Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. without the express agreement of CSa Environmental Planning. The Ordnance Survey mapping included in this document is provided by Rother District CSa Environmental Planning do not accept liability for any loss or Council under licence from the Ordnance Survey for the purpose of compiling the damage arising from any unauthorised use of this report. North Bexhill Landscape and Ecological Study. Persons viewing this mapping should contact Ordnance Survey copyright for advice where they wish to licence Ordnance This document can be made available in large print or other Survey mapping for their own use. formats. The North Bexhill Landscape and Ecological Study has been prepared by CSa Environmental Planning on behalf of Rother District Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Assessment of Kent 2004
    CHILHAM: STOUR VALLEY Location map: CHILHAMCHARACTER AREA DESCRIPTION North of Bilting, the Stour Valley becomes increasingly enclosed. The rolling sides of the valley support large arable fields in the east, while sweeps of parkland belonging to Godmersham Park and Chilham Castle cover most of the western slopes. On either side of the valley, dense woodland dominate the skyline and a number of substantial shaws and plantations on the lower slopes reflect the importance of game cover in this area. On the valley bottom, the river is picked out in places by waterside alders and occasional willows. The railway line is obscured for much of its length by trees. STOUR VALLEY Chilham lies within the larger character area of the Stour Valley within the Kent Downs AONB. The Great Stour is the most easterly of the three rivers cutting through the Downs. Like the Darent and the Medway, it too provided an early access route into the heart of Kent and formed an ancient focus for settlement. Today the Stour Valley is highly valued for the quality of its landscape, especially by the considerable numbers of walkers who follow the Stour Valley Walk or the North Downs Way National Trail. Despite its proximity to both Canterbury and Ashford, the Stour Valley retains a strong rural identity. Enclosed by steep scarps on both sides, with dense woodlands on the upper slopes, the valley is dominated by intensively farmed arable fields interspersed by broad sweeps of mature parkland. Unusually, there are no electricity pylons cluttering the views across the valley. North of Bilting, the river flows through a narrow, pastoral floodplain, dotted with trees such as willow and alder and drained by small ditches.
    [Show full text]
  • The Landscape Assessment of Kent
    The Landscape Assessment of Kent October 2004 Prepared for Kent County Council by Jacobs Babtie Kent County Council Invicta House County Hall Maidstone Kent ME14 1XX Tel: 01622 221537 Jacobs Babtie Miller House Lower Stone Street Maidstone Kent ME15 6GB Tel: 01622 666000 Produced with the financial support of the European Regional Development Fund Front cover photograph courtesy of Jason Mitchell EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Kentish landscape has evolved over many hundreds of years. It has been created by the interaction of the natural environment and human activities, in particular the combination of physical, biological and cultural influences. Physical influences such as geology and landform, together with the overlying pattern of settlement and land use are key determinants of landscape character. The Landscape Assessment of Kent is a landscape character based study that draws together existing landscape character assessments of the county and updates them to conform to the current guidance. Additional work on the condition and sensitivity of the Kent landscape has been used to formulate character-based strategies to ensure the continued distinctiveness of the Kent landscape. It is intended that the Landscape Assessment of Kent will be used in a variety of forward planning strategies, in land management schemes and in planning control. The objective is to ensure that decisions on the rural landscape are underpinned by a robust and widely accepted assessment of the landscape character. The challenge is to find ways of identifying the important characteristics of the landscape that assist the process of accommodating change, where this is both desirable and practicable, whilst maintaining the links with the past and the natural environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the South-East IAP Report Here
    Important Areas for Ponds (IAPs) in the Environment Agency Southern Region Helen Keeble, Penny Williams, Jeremy Biggs and Mike Athanson Report prepared by: Report produced for: Pond Conservation Environment Agency c/o Oxford Brookes University Southern Regional Office Gipsy Lane, Headington Guildbourne House Oxford, OX3 0BP Chatsworth Road, Worthing Sussex, BN11 1LD Acknowledgements We would like to thank all those who took time to send pond data and pictures or other information for this assessment. In particular: Adam Fulton, Alex Lockton, Alice Hiley, Alison Cross, Alistair Kirk, Amanda Bassett, Andrew Lawson, Anne Marston, Becky Collybeer, Beth Newman, Bradley Jamieson, Catherine Fuller, Chris Catling, Daniel Piec, David Holyoak, David Rumble, Debbie Miller, Debbie Tann, Dominic Price, Dorothy Wright, Ed Jarzembowski, Garf Williams, Garth Foster, Georgina Terry, Guy Hagg, Hannah Cook, Henri Brocklebank, Ian Boyd, Jackie Kelly, Jane Frostick, Jay Doyle, Jo Thornton, Joe Stevens, John Durnell, Jonty Denton, Katharine Parkes, Kevin Walker, Kirsten Wright, Laurie Jackson, Lee Brady, Lizzy Peat, Martin Rand, Mary Campling, Matt Shardlow, Mike Phillips, Naomi Ewald, Natalie Rogers, Nic Ferriday, Nick Stewart, Nicky Court, Nicola Barnfather, Oli Grafton, Pauline Morrow, Penny Green, Pete Thompson, Phil Buckley, Philip Sansum, Rachael Hunter, Richard Grogan, Richard Moyse, Richard Osmond, Rufus Sage, Russell Wright, Sarah Jane Chimbwandira, Sheila Brooke, Simon Weymouth, Steph Ames, Terry Langford, Tom Butterworth, Tom Reid, Vicky Kindemba. Cover photograph: Low Weald Pond, Lee Brady Report production: February 2009 Consultation: March 2009 SUMMARY Ponds are an important freshwater habitat and play a key role in maintaining biodiversity at the landscape level. However, they are vulnerable to environmental degradation and there is evidence that, at a national level, pond quality is declining.
    [Show full text]
  • English Nature Research Report
    Vatural Area: 33. East Anglian Plain Geological Sigaificance: Outstanding (provisional) General geological character: The solid geology of the East Anglian Natural Area is mainly underlain by Jpper Cretaceous chalk. This very pure limestone was laid down on the floor of a tropical sea between 97 md 74 Ma. Locally the chalk is rich in fossils including sea-urchins and bivalves. Overlying much of the ;halk is a complex sequence of Quaternary deposits (deposited over the last 2 Ma) showing changes in Aimate and environment from both cold (glacial) and temperate (interglacial) periods. These sediments hostcompletely obscure the underlying chalk and it is their composition which gives the Natural Area its :haacter. The base of the Quaternary sequence is the early Pleistocene Crag deposits which are marine jcdiments of*shelly muds and sands, often containing temperate marinc molluscan faunas. However, the nost extensive and thickest Quaternary sediments consist of glacial sands, gravels and clays deposited by the 4nglian ice sheet as it advanced across the area around 300,000 to 250,000 years BP. These deposits are ;ollectivcly known as 'boulder clay' and their calcareous nature reflects glacial erosion and transportation of he chalk bedrock beneath. The Anglian glaciation interrupted a well-developed fluvial network of eastward flowing rivers, and patches of these preglacial river gravels are still found within the area. Many localitites show river gravels related to the early development of the River Thames, which crossed this area prior to jiversion by the Anglian ice sheet. These sites are important for Quaternary stratigraphy (including records Jf climate change) because they can be correlated with sedirnents in other parts of Britain and abroad.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Sites Development Plan Document Options Consultation (May 2011) Commentary Report (Revised Edition September 2012
    Kent County Council—Waste Sites Options Commentary Report. Revised Edition– September 2012 Kent Minerals And Waste Development Framework Waste Sites Development Plan Document Options Consultation (May 2011) Commentary Report (Revised edition September 2012 The full responses for the Waste Sites Development Plan Document Consultation can be found at: http://consult.kent.gov.uk/portal/waste-dpd/waste-options?tab=list 1 Kent County Council—Waste Sites Options Commentary Report. Revised Edition– September 2012 This revised edition of the commentary report includes some minor changes to address concerns raised by the Kent Downs AONB unit. Produced by : Planning and Environment Environment and Enterprise Kent County Council Invicta House Tel: 01622 696815 County Hall Email: [email protected] Maidstone Web: www.kent.gov.uk/mwdf Kent ME14 1XX Textphone: 08458247905 The full responses for the Waste Sites Development Plan Document Consultation can be found at: http://consult.kent.gov.uk/portal/waste-dpd/waste-options?tab=list 2 Kent County Council—Waste Sites Options Commentary Report. Revised Edition– September 2012 Contents Page 1. Abbreviations 4 2. Introduction 5 3. Site Proposals 7 4. Responses for Waste Sites DPD 9 5. Energy From Waste 11 6. Hazardous Landfills 27 7. Non-Hazardous Landfill 31 8. Treatment/Materials Recycling Facility Sites for Consideration 35 9. Composting Sites for Consideration 59 10. Household Waste Recycling Centres & Transfer Sites for 75 Consideration 11. Inert/Construction, Demolition and Excavations Landfill & 99 Landraise Sites for Consideration 12. Environmental Improvement to Closed Bio-degradable Land- 129 fill Sites for Consideration 13. Glossary 143 14. Biodiversity Comments Glossary 148 The full responses for the Waste Sites Development Plan Document Consultation can be found at: http://consult.kent.gov.uk/portal/waste-dpd/waste-options?tab=list 3 Kent County Council—Waste Sites Options Commentary Report.
    [Show full text]