DOCSLIB.ORG

United States V. Microsoft Amicus Contributors in Microsoft’S Case Challenging a U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
United States V. Microsoft Amicus Contributors in Microsoft’S Case Challenging a U.S United States v. Microsoft Amicus Contributors in Microsoft’s Case Challenging a U.S. Search Warrant for Emails Overseas Twenty-three amicus briefs supporting Microsoft’s case were filed with the Supreme Court by 289 signatories including Members of Congress, European lawmakers, leading technology companies, media organizations, legal scholars, computer scientists, trade associations and advocacy groups that collectively represent millions of members across 37 countries. Additionally, in December 2017, seven entities filed neutral amicus briefs in Microsoft’s lawsuit that highlight the substantial international interest in this case and the importance of new solutions. Those briefs were filed by the Republic of Ireland, the European Commission on behalf of the European Union, the United Kingdom, the New Zealand Privacy Commissioner, the U.N. Special Rapporteur on the Right to Privacy, former law enforcement, national security and intelligence officials, and E-discovery practitioners. U.S. and European Lawmakers Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) MEP Axel Voss (Germany) Sen. Christopher Coons (D-DE) MEP Claude Moraes (London) Rep. Doug Collins (R-GA) MEP Birgit Sippel (Germany) Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) MEP Gianni Pittella (Italy) Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) MEP Guy Verhofstadt (Belgium) MEP Jan Philipp Albrecht (Germany) MEP Manfred Weber (Germany) MEP Sophie in ‘t Veld (Netherlands) MEP Ska Keller (Germany) MEP Viviane Reding (Luxembourg) Technology Companies Amazon.com, Inc. Mozilla Apple Inc. Oath Cisco Systems, Inc. Reddit, Inc. Dropbox, Inc. salesforce.com, inc. eBay Inc. SAP Facebook, Inc. Verizon Google LLC International Business Machines HP Inc. Corporation (IBM) Trade Groups BSA | The Software Alliance BITKOM Association of German Chambers of The Chamber of Commerce of the TECH IN France Commerce and Industry (Deutscher United States of America Syntec Numérique Industrie- und Handelskammertag e.v. National Association of Manufacturers The Federation of Hellenic Information or “DIHK”) ACT | The App Association Technology & Communications Ibec clg (“Ibec”) Entertainment Software Association Enterprises (SEPE) Polish Confederation Lewiatan Information Technology and Innovation The Association of Electronics, (Konfederacja Lewiatan or “Lewiatan”) Foundation (ITIF) Information and Communications French Business Federation Small Business & Entrepreneurship Technologies, Telecommunications and (Mouvement des Entreprises de France Council Digital Content Companies (AMETIC) or “MEDEF”) Bundesverband der Deutschen Digital Europe Industrie e.V. or “BDI”) Advocacy Organizations Americans for Tax Reform (ATR) Privacy International Italian Coalition for Civil Liberties and Center for Democracy and Technology Artículo 12 Rights (CDT) Asociación por los Derechos Civiles La Quadrature du Net New America’s Open Technology Australian Privacy Foundation Liberty Institute Bits of Freedom Open Net FreedomWorks Foundation Civil Rights Defenders Panoptykon Foundation National Taxpayers Union Derechos Digitales América Latina Red en Defensa de los Derechos Policing Project at NYU Digital Freedom and Rights Association Digitales Digital Rights Ireland Elektronisk Forpost Norge (Electronic Renaissance Numérique Open Rights Institute Frontier Norway) Professor Simon Chesterman Gesellschaft für Freiheitsrechte e.V. European Digital Rights Vrijschrift (GFF) Fundación Datos Protegidos InternetLab Law and Technology Center CEI Fundación Karisma CATO Foundation for Information Policy TechFreedom Research Reason Foundation Hiperderecho American Consumer Institute Human Rights Watch EPIC International Cyber Law Studies in Brennan Center for Justice Korea American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) IPANDETEC Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Restore the Fourth R St Institute Media Organizations Advance Publications, Inc. Freedom of the Press Foundation Online News Association (“ONA”) ALM Media, LLC Gannett Co., Inc. PEN American Center (“PEN America”) American Society of News Editors The International Documentary Radio Television Digital News The Associated Press Media Editors Association (IDA) Association (“RTDNA”) Association of Alternative Newsmedia The Investigative Reporting Workshop The Reporters Committee for Freedom (AAN_ The McClatchy Company of the Press Cable News Network, Inc. (“CNN”) The Media Institute Reporters Without Borders The Center for Investigative Reporting The Media Law Resource Center, Inc. The Seattle Times Company (CIR) (“MLRC”) Society of Professional Journalists (“SPJ”) The Committee to Protect Journalists The Association of Magazine Media, Thomson Reuters Markets Daily News, LP (“MPA”) Tronc, Inc. The E.W. Scripps Company The National Press Photographers The Tully Center for Free Speech The European Publishers Council Association (“NPPA”) Verband Deutscher Zeitschriftenverleger First Amendment Coalition National Public Radio, Inc. (NPR) (“VDZ”) First Look Media Works, Inc. The News Media Alliance VICE Media Forbes Media LLC The News Guild – CWA Vox Media Fox News Network LLC WP Company LLC Academics, Scientists & Legal Experts Professors of Computer Science Azer Bestavros, Boston University John L. Hennessy, Stanford University Ronald L. Rivest, Massachusetts Matt Bishop, University of California at Haym B. Hirsh, Cornell University Institute of Technology Davis Daniel Peter Huttenlocher, Cornell Aviel D. Rubin, Johns Hopkins Matthew Blaze, University of University University Pennsylvania Brian Kernighan, Princeton University Fred B. Schneider, Cornell University Jon Kleinberg, Cornell University Avrim L. Blum, Toyota Technological Edward D. Lazowska, University of Dana S. Scott, Carnegie Mellon Institute at Chicago Washington University Dan Boneh, StanfordUniversity Henry M. Levy, University of Scott Shenker, University of California Eric A. Brewer, University of California Washington at Berkeley at Berkeley Barbara Liskov, Massachusetts Institute Eugene H. Spafford, Purdue University Frederick P. Brooks, Jr., University of of Technology Ivan E. Sutherland, Portland State North Carolina atChapel Hill Darrell Long University of California at University Douglas E. Comer, Purdue University Santa Cruz Michael Stonebraker, Massachusetts Fernando Corbato, Massachusetts Anna Lysyanskaya, Brown University Institute of Technology Institute of Technology Bruce MacDowell Maggs, Duke Eva Tardos, Cornell University David J. Farber, Carnegie Mellon University Donald F. Towsley, University of University Kathleen R. McKeown, Columbia Massachusetts Amherst Nick Feamster, Princeton University University Philip Wadler, University of Edinburgh Edward Feigenbaum, Stanford Nick W. McKeown, Stanford University James H. Waldo, Harvard University University David Maier, Portland State University Dan S. Wallach, Rice University Michael J. Freedman, Princeton John Gregory Morrisett, Cornell Doran K. Wilde, Brigham Young University University University Allan Gottlieb, New York University David A. Patterson, University of John Guttag, Massachusetts Institute of California at Berkeley Technology William W. Pugh, University of J. Alex Halderman, University of Maryland, College Park Michigan Raj Reddy, Carnegie Mellon University Mor Harchol-Baltor, Carnegie Mellon Jennifer Rexford, Princeton University University Nadia Heninger, University of Pennsylvania Professors of Law, Legal & Technical Experts, and Legal Organizations Council of Bars and Law Societies of Enrique Belda Pedrero, Professor of Ronald L. Rivest, MIT Europe Constitutional Law, University of Pamela Samuelson, University of Cassandra Burke Robertson, Case Castilla-La Mancha; Member, Legal California, Berkeley Western Reserve University Advisory Council, Region of CastillaLa Bruce Schneier Fellow and Lecturer, Anthony Colango, SMU Dedman Mancha Harvard Kennedy School School of Law Rosario Serra Cristobal, Professor of Dr. Barbara Simons, IBM Research Austen L. Parrish, Indiana University Constitutional Law, University of (retired), Tonya Lee Putnam, Columbia University Valencia Robert Ellis Smith Publisher, Privacy Robert Sloane, Boston University Miryam Rodriguez Izquierdo, Professor Journal Daniel Solove, George Washington of Constitutional Law, University of Nadine Strossen, New York Law School; University Law School Sevilla Sherry Turkle, MIT Dr. Maja Brkan, Maastricht University Monica Arenas Ramiro, Professor of Edward G. Viltz, Internet Collaboration Professor Céline Castets-Renard, Constitutional Law, University of Alcalá Coalition University of Toulouse de Henares Jim Waldo, Harvard Kennedy School Professor Dr. Mark D. Cole, University Joaquin Sarrion Esteve, Ramon y Cajal Christopher Wolf, Future of Privacy of Luxembourg Researcher, Professor of Constitutional Forum Professor Egbert Dommering, Law, University UNED Shoshana Zuboff, Harvard Business University of Amsterdam German Teruel Lozano, Professor of School Professor Dr. Nikolaus Forgó, University Constitutional Law, University of Murcia Valena Beety, West Virginia University of Vienna Fernando Perez Dominguez, Professor College of Law Professor em. Douwe Korff, London of Constitutional Law, University of Jordan “Jody” M. Blanke, Mercer Metropolitan University Huelva 3a University Professor Dr. Eleni Kosta, Tilburg Monica Martinez Lopez-Saez, Robert M. Bloom, Boston College Law University Predoctoral researcher (FPU-MECD) in School Professor Katalin Ligeti, University of Constitutional Law Jenny E. Carroll, University of Alabama Luxembourg Leire Burguera Ameave, Professor of School of Law Dr. Cristina M. Mariottini, Max Planck Constitutional
Load more

Recommended publications
  • European Parliament 2014-2019
    European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs LIBE_PV(2016)0321_2 MINUTES Extraordinary meeting of 21 March 2016, 15:00 - 18.30 BRUSSELS The meeting opened at 15:06 on Monday, 21 March 2016, with Birgit Sippel presiding. 1. Adoption of agenda LIBE_OJ (2015)0321_1 The agenda was adopted with the following change in the order of business: point 6 had been postponed to a later meeting. 2. Chair's announcements The Chair indicated that interpretation was available in all languages except Gaelic, Danish and Croatian for this meeting. 3. Approval of minutes The following minutes were approved: 30 March 2015 - 1 April 2015 PV – PE573.170v01-00 28-29 May 2015 PV – PE557.308v01-00 2 July 2015 PV – PE560.887v01-00 4. Legal aid for suspects or accused persons deprived of liberty and legal aid in European arrest warrant proceedings LIBE/8/00271 ***I 2013/0409(COD) COM(2013)0824 – C7-0429/2013 The Rapporteur Dennis de Jong (GUE/NGL) presented the state of play of the on- going trilogue negotiations to the committee. Birgit Sippel (S&D) as acting Chair introduced the debate, followed by an intervention of Jan Zwart for the Dutch Council Presidency. PV\1089581EN.docx PE578.836v01-00 EN United in diversity EN 5. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) report "Professionally speaking: challenges to achieving equality for LGBT people" LIBE/8/05990 Presentation by Ioannis Dimitrakopoulos, FRA’s Head of Equality and Citizens’ Rights Department Ioannis Dimitrakopoulos presented the report of the Fundamental Rights Agency. - The following Members took the floor: Bigitt Sippel (S&D), Jean Lambert (Greens/ALE) and Marek Jurek (ECR).
    [Show full text]
  • Green Deal – the Coordinators
    Green Deal – The Coordinators David Sassoli S&D ”I want the European Green Deal to become Europe’s hallmark. At the heart of it is our commitment to becoming the world’s first climate-neutral continent. It is also a long-term economic imperative: those who act first European Parliament and fastest will be the ones who grasp the opportunities from the ecological transition. I want Europe to be 1 February 2020 – H1 2024 the front-runner. I want Europe to be the exporter of knowledge, technologies and best practice.” — Ursula von der Leyen Lorenzo Mannelli Klaus Welle President of the European Commission Head of Cabinet Secretary General Chairs and Vice-Chairs Political Group Coordinators EPP S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe ENVI Renew Committee on Europe Dan-Ştefan Motreanu César Luena Peter Liese Jytte Guteland Nils Torvalds Silvia Sardone Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator the Environment, Public Health Greens/EFA GUE/NGL Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL and Food Safety Pacal Canfin Chair Bas Eickhout Anja Hazekamp Bas Eickhout Alexandr Vondra Silvia Modig Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator S&D S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe EPP ITRE Patrizia Toia Lina Gálvez Muñoz Christian Ehler Dan Nica Martina Dlabajová Paolo Borchia Committee on Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Industry, Research Renew ECR Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL and Energy Cristian Bușoi Europe Chair Morten Petersen Zdzisław Krasnodębski Ville Niinistö Zdzisław Krasnodębski Marisa Matias Vice-Chair Vice-Chair
    [Show full text]
  • The Power of Abstraction
    The Power of Abstraction Barbara Liskov March 2013 MIT CSAIL Software is Complex Systems are big and they do complicated things and they may be distributed and/or concurrent Addressing Complexity Algorithms, data structures, protocols Addressing Complexity Algorithms, data structures, protocols Programming methodology Programming languages This Talk Programming methodology as it developed Programming languages Programming languages today The Situation in 1970 The software crisis! Programming Methodology How should programs be designed? How should programs be structured? The Landscape E. W. Dijkstra. Go To Statement Considered Harmful. Cacm, Mar. 1968 The Landscape N. Wirth. Program Development by Stepwise Refinement. Cacm, April 1971 The Landscape D. L. Parnas. Information Distribution Aspects of Design Methodology. IFIP Congress, 1971 “The connections between modules are the assumptions which the modules make about each other.” Modularity A program is a collection of modules Modularity A program is a collection of modules Each module has an interface, described by a specification Modularity A program is a collection of modules Each has an interface, described by a specification A module’s implementation is correct if it meets the specification A using module depends only on the specification Modularity A program is a collection of modules Each has an interface, described by a specification A module’s implementation is correct if it meets the specification A using module depends only on the specification E.g. a sort routine sort(a) Benefits of Modularity Local reasoning Modifiability Independent development The Situation in 1970 Procedures were the only type of module Not powerful enough, e.g., a file system Not used very much Complicated connections Partitions B.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Ecosy Congress
    10 TH ECOSY CONGRESS Bucharest, 31 March – 3 April 2011 th Reports of the 9 Mandate ECOSY – Young European Socialists “Talking about my generation” CONTENTS Petroula Nteledimou ECOSY President p. 3 Janna Besamusca ECOSY Secretary General p. 10 Brando Benifei Vice President p. 50 Christophe Schiltz Vice President p. 55 Kaisa Penny Vice President p. 57 Nils Hindersmann Vice President p. 60 Pedro Delgado Alves Vice President p. 62 Joan Conca Coordinator Migration and Integration network p. 65 Marianne Muona Coordinator YFJ network p. 66 Michael Heiling Coordinator Pool of Trainers p. 68 Miki Dam Larsen Coordinator Queer Network p. 70 Sandra Breiteneder Coordinator Feminist Network p. 71 Thomas Maes Coordinator Students Network p. 72 10 th ECOSY Congress 2 Held thanks to hospitality of TSD Bucharest, Romania 31 st March - 3 rd April 2011 9th Mandate reports ECOSY – Young European Socialists “Talking about my generation” Petroula Nteledimou, ECOSY President Report of activities, 16/04/2009 – 01/04/2011 - 16-19/04/2009 : ECOSY Congress , Brussels (Belgium). - 24/04/2009 : PES Leaders’ Meeting , Toulouse (France). Launch of the PES European Elections Campaign. - 25/04/2009 : SONK European Elections event , Helsinki (Finland). Speaker on behalf of ECOSY. - 03/05/2009 : PASOK Youth European Elections event , Drama (Greece). Speaker on behalf of ECOSY. - 04/05/2009 : Greek Women’s Union European Elections debate , Kavala (Greece). Speaker on behalf of ECOSY. - 07-08/05/2009 : European Youth Forum General Assembly , Brussels (Belgium). - 08/05/2009 : PES Presidency meeting , Brussels (Belgium). - 09-10/05/2009 : JS Portugal European Election debate , Lisbon (Portugal). Speaker on behalf of ECOSY.
    [Show full text]
  • MIT Turing Laureates Propose Creation of School of Computing an Open Letter to President Rafael Reif
    9/26/2017 The Tech OPINION LETTER TO THE EDITOR MIT Turing laureates propose creation of School of Computing An open letter to President Rafael Reif By MIT Turing Laureates | Sep. 20, 2017 Facebook Dear Rafael, Twitter There comes a time, in the course of scientic evolution, when a discipline is ready to emerge from the womb of its parent disciplines and take its own place in the world. For Reddit computer science, or more accurately, for the eld of computing, this moment is now. Print Born from a combination of mathematics and electrical engineering, with the original intent of speeding up calculations, computer science has grown to encompass all information processing and most communications and now to provide an alternative evolutionary path to intelligence. Computer science is rapidly becoming an essential part of most academic disciplines, and students are voting with their feet. One third of MIT undergraduates are majoring in computer science. This trend is unlikely to slow down anytime soon. We, the 7 active MIT Turing Award winners, therefore write this open letter to recommend that you consider the bold step of establishing a School of Computing at MIT. The new school, a brother to the Schools of Engineering and Science, will allow the eld of computing, with its many https://thetech.com/2017/09/20/turing-laureates-open-letter-to-reif 1/4 9/26/2017 The Tech facets and sub-elds, to grow and interact naturally with the Institute’s scientic and engineering environment. The Tech Submit Campus Life Stories Today the study of computation is housed primarily in the EECS department within the School of Engineering, but departments are limited in their ability to hire and grow.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament: 7Th February 2017 Redistribution of Political Balance
    POLICY PAPER European issues n°420 European Parliament: 7th February 2017 redistribution of political balance Charles de Marcilly François Frigot At the mid-term of the 8th legislature, the European Parliament, in office since the elections of May 2014, is implementing a traditional “distribution” of posts of responsibility. Article 19 of the internal regulation stipulates that the Chairs of the parliamentary committees, the Deputy-Chairs, as well as the questeurs, hold their mandates for a renewable 2 and a-half year period. Moreover, internal elections within the political groups have supported their Chairs, whilst we note that there has been some slight rebalancing in terms of the coordinators’ posts. Although Italian citizens draw specific attention with the two main candidates in the battle for the top post, we should note other appointments if we are to understand the careful balance between nationalities, political groups and individual experience of the European members of Parliament. A TUMULTUOUS PRESIDENTIAL provide collective impetus to potential hesitations on the part of the Member States. In spite of the victory of the European People’s Party (EPP) in the European elections, it supported Martin As a result the election of the new President of Schulz in July 2104 who stood for a second mandate as Parliament was a lively[1] affair: the EPP candidate – President of the Parliament. In all, with the support of the Antonio Tajani – and S&D Gianni Pittella were running Liberals (ADLE), Martin Schulz won 409 votes following neck and neck in the fourth round of the relative an agreement concluded by the “grand coalition” after majority of the votes cast[2].
    [Show full text]
  • Prominence of Expert System and Case Study- DENDRAL Namita Mirjankar, Shruti Ghatnatti Karnataka, India [email protected],[email protected]
    International Journal of Advanced Networking & Applications (IJANA) ISSN: 0975-0282 Prominence of Expert System and Case Study- DENDRAL Namita Mirjankar, Shruti Ghatnatti Karnataka, India [email protected],[email protected] Abstract—Among many applications of Artificial Intelligence, Expert System is the one that exploits human knowledge to solve problems which ordinarily would require human insight. Expert systems are designed to carry the insight and knowledge found in the experts in a particular field and take decisions based on the accumulated knowledge of the knowledge base along with an arrangement of standards and principles of inference engine, and at the same time, justify those decisions with the help of explanation facility. Inference engine is continuously updated as new conclusions are drawn from each new certainty in the knowledge base which triggers extra guidelines, heuristics and rules in the inference engine. This paper explains the basic architecture of Expert System , its first ever success DENDRAL which became a stepping stone in the Artificial Intelligence field, as well as the difficulties faced by the Expert Systems Keywords—Artificial Intelligence; Expert System architecture; knowledge base; inference engine; DENDRAL I INTRODUCTION the main components that remain same are: User Interface, Knowledge Base and Inference Engine. For more than two thousand years, rationalists all over the world have been striving to comprehend and resolve two unavoidable issues of the universe: how does a human mind work, and can non-people have minds? In any case, these inquiries are still unanswered. As humans, we all are blessed with the ability to learn and comprehend, to think about different issues and to decide; but can we design machines to do all these things? Some philosophers are open to the idea that machines will perform all the tasks a human can do.
    [Show full text]
  • Brussels, to the Attention of Members of the European Parliament Who
    CATHERINE ASHTQN ANDRIS PIEBALGS HIGH REPRESENTATIVE MEMBER OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION VICE PRESIDENT OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION DEVELOPMENT Brussels, A(2013)3540142-3819594 To the attention of Members of the European Parliament who signed the letter of 20 November Dear Colleagues, Thank you for your letter of 20 November addressed to both of us as well as to Commissioners Georgieva and De Gucht concerning land acquisitions in Colombia. Land issues axe obviously one of the key dimensions of the decade-old internal conflict in Colombia and therefore deserve close attention on the part of the EU. This is the reason why the EU has been devoting considerable financial resources to funding projects aimed at helping displaced people, at facilitating their return and reintegration and at supporting people at risk in the framework of the land restitution process. Moreover, the EU is also directly contributing to the implementation of the law on victims and land restitution through a project funded in the framework of the instrument for stability. At political level, the issues related to the implementation of the law are also discussed regularly in the framework of the various dialogue fora between the EU and Colombia, including the EU-Coiombia Dialogue on Human Rights. The EU is also engaged in exchanges with the Colombian authorities about mining and natural resources, which have an obvious relation with land use and occupation issues. The EU is hopeful that the current negotiations between the FARC and the Colombian authorities should, if they are successful, contribute to reducing tensions about land in Colombia. We have also been informed that the Colombian institute for Rural Development (INCODER), in charge of the formalisation of land titles, has launched a number of enquiries into a number of cases of alleged undue accumulation of agricultural family units (IJAF), including in the region to which your correspondence refers.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
    [Show full text]
  • A-8-2016-0354 EN.Pdf
    European Parliament 2014-2019 Plenary sitting A8-0354/2016 28.11.2016 *** RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the United States of America and the European Union on the protection of personal information relating to the prevention, investigation, detection, and prosecution of criminal offenses (08523/2016 – C8-0329/2016 – 2016/0126(NLE)) Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Rapporteur: Jan Philipp Albrecht RR\1110883EN.docx PE592.131v03-00 EN United in diversity EN PR_NLE-AP_Agreement Symbols for procedures * Consultation procedure *** Consent procedure ***I Ordinary legislative procedure (first reading) ***II Ordinary legislative procedure (second reading) ***III Ordinary legislative procedure (third reading) (The type of procedure depends on the legal basis proposed by the draft act.) PE592.131v03-00 2/17 RR\1110883EN.docx EN CONTENTS Page DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION ................................. 5 SHORT JUSTIFICATION ......................................................................................................... 6 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS ................................................... 10 ANNEX: LETTER FROM THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS .......................... 14 PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE ................................................................... 16 FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE .................................... 17 RR\1110883EN.docx
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1909.05204V3 [Cs.DC] 6 Feb 2020
    Cogsworth: Byzantine View Synchronization Oded Naor, Technion and Calibra Mathieu Baudet, Calibra Dahlia Malkhi, Calibra Alexander Spiegelman, VMware Research Most methods for Byzantine fault tolerance (BFT) in the partial synchrony setting divide the local state of the nodes into views, and the transition from one view to the next dictates a leader change. In order to provide liveness, all honest nodes need to stay in the same view for a sufficiently long time. This requires view synchronization, a requisite of BFT that we extract and formally define here. Existing approaches for Byzantine view synchronization incur quadratic communication (in n, the number of parties). A cascade of O(n) view changes may thus result in O(n3) communication complexity. This paper presents a new Byzantine view synchronization algorithm named Cogsworth, that has optimistically linear communication complexity and constant latency. Faced with benign failures, Cogsworth has expected linear communication and constant latency. The result here serves as an important step towards reaching solutions that have overall quadratic communication, the known lower bound on Byzantine fault tolerant consensus. Cogsworth is particularly useful for a family of BFT protocols that already exhibit linear communication under various circumstances, but suffer quadratic overhead due to view synchro- nization. 1. INTRODUCTION Logical synchronization is a requisite for progress to be made in asynchronous state machine repli- cation (SMR). Previous Byzantine fault tolerant (BFT) synchronization mechanisms incur quadratic message complexities, frequently dominating over the linear cost of the consensus cores of BFT so- lutions. In this work, we define the view synchronization problem and provide the first solution in the Byzantine setting, whose latency is bounded and communication cost is linear, under a broad set of scenarios.
    [Show full text]
  • Almost Gone: the Vanishing Fourth Amendment's Allowance Of
    GEE- TO PRINT (DO NOT DELETE) 5/21/2019 4:05 PM ALMOST GONE: THE VANISHING FOURTH AMENDMENT’S ALLOWANCE OF STINGRAY SURVEILLANCE IN A POST-CARPENTER AGE HARVEY GEE* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. FOURTH AMENDMENT JURISPRUDENCE AND THE LACK OF POLICE ACCOUNTABILITY IN TRAFFIC STOPS .......... 412 II. BEYOND TERRY V. OHIO: FROM ONE-ON-ONE ENCOUNTERS TO PROACTIVE LARGE-SCALE STOP AND FRISKS ON THE STREETS WITHIN A POLICE STATE ......................................................................................... 417 III. DIGITAL UPGRADE: SURVEILLANCE STATE TECHNOLOGY AND REFRAMING THE SUPREME COURT’S FOURTH AMENDMENT JURISPRUDENCE ........ 420 A. CARPENTER V. UNITED STATES: POSITIONING A RESILIENT FOURTH AMENDMENT ON A PRO-PRIVACY TRAJECTORY IN THE DIGITAL AGE ............................................................. 423 IV. PRIVACY AND THE FOURTH AMENDMENT AFTER CARPENTER: ARGUING AGAINST THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL USE OF STINGRAY SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY ........................................... 430 * The author is an attorney in San Francisco. He previously served as an Attorney with the Office of the Federal Public Defender in Las Vegas and Pittsburgh, the Federal Defenders of the Middle District of Georgia, and the Office of the Colorado State Public Defender. LL.M, The George Washington University Law School; J.D., St. Mary’s School of Law; B.A., Sonoma State University. The author thanks Taylor Francis, Elvira Razzano, Austin Smith, and the Southern California Review of Law and Social Justice for their assistance and hard work in the preparation of this article. 409 410 REVIEW OF LAW AND SOCIAL JUSTICE [Vol. 28:3 A. THE SECRET USE OF STINGRAY SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY BY LAW ENFORCEMENT ................................ 431 B. CALLS FOR A WARRANT REQUIREMENT FOR THE USE OF STINGRAY CELL-SITE SIMULATORS FROM LEGAL SCHOLARS ............................................................................
    [Show full text]