DOCSLIB.ORG

Minutes of the Sitting of 10 November 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Minutes of the Sitting of 10 November 2010 27.1.2011 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 25 E/1 Wednesday 10 November 2010 IV (Notices) NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2010-2011 SESSION Sittings of 10 and 11 November 2010 BRUSSELS MINUTES OF THE SITTING OF 10 NOVEMBER 2010 (2011/C 25 E/01) Contents Page 1. Resumption of the session . 2 2. Approval of the minutes of the previous sitting . 2 3. Statements by the President . 2 4. Composition of Parliament . 3 5. Corrigendum (Rule 216) . 3 6. Composition of committees and delegations . 3 7. Documents received . 4 8. Action taken on Parliament’s positions and resolutions . 8 9. Texts of agreements forwarded by the Council . 8 10. Oral questions and written declarations (submission) . 8 11. Transfers of appropriations . 9 12. Implementing measures (Rule 88) . 10 13. Order of business . 11 14. Upcoming EU-US summit and Transatlantic Economic Council - EU-US Data Protection Agreement (debate) . 12 C 25 E/2 EN Official Journal of the European Union 27.1.2011 Wednesday 10 November 2010 Contents (continued) Page 15. EU external strategy on Passenger Name Record (debate) . 13 16. Alternative investment fund managers ***I (debate) . 14 17. Single Market Act (debate) . 15 18. Innovation partnerships (debate) . 15 19. Strengthening the OSCE: a role for the EU (debate) . 16 20. Amendment of Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders of Member States and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement ***I (debate) . 17 21. One-minute speeches on matters of political importance . 17 22. Demographic challenge and solidarity between generations (short presentation) . 17 23. Implementation of the Research Framework Programmes (short presentation) . 18 24. Agenda of the next sitting . 18 25. Closure of the sitting . 18 ATTENDANCE REGISTER . 19 MINUTES OF THE SITTING OF 10 NOVEMBER 2010 IN THE CHAIR: Jerzy BUZEK President 1. Resumption of the session The sitting opened at 15.05. 2. Approval of the minutes of the previous sitting The minutes of the previous sitting were approved. 3. Statements by the President The President condemned the violent attack on the journalist Oleg Kashin in Moscow during the night of Friday 5 to Saturday 6 November 2010 and welcomed the fact that Mr Medvedev, the President of the Russian Federation, had swiftly called for those guilty to be brought to justice. The President said that on 31 October 2010, for the first time in two years, a demonstration had been held in Moscow without the police intervening. He expressed Parliament’s hope that this was an indication that public life in Russia was becoming democratic. On the same day, Christians in the Syriac Catholic cathedral in Baghdad in Iraq had been the victims of a terrorist attack. On behalf of Parliament, the President called for an end to religious violence in the region. 27.1.2011 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 25 E/3 Wednesday 10 November 2010 Concerning the award of the Nobel Peace Prize on 10 December 2010, the President expressed his disapproval of the Chinese authorities’ attempts to put pressure on the European ambassadors, to dissuade them from attending the ceremony. The European Parliament considered human rights throughout the world to be inalienable. Parliament would be represented at the ceremony by the head of the European Union’s delegation in Norway. * * * The following spoke: Luigi Berlinguer on the recent floods in Venice and the collapse of the House of the Gladiators in Pompeii. 4. Composition of Parliament Ramón Jáuregui Atondo had informed the President that he had been appointed a member of the Spanish Government with effect from 21 October 2010. Parliament took note of this and, in accordance with Article 7(1) of the Act on the election of members of the European Parliament by universal suffrage and with Rule 4(1) and (4), established that his seat would be vacant with effect from 21 October 2010. 5. Corrigendum (Rule 216) The committee responsible had forwarded the following corrigendum (P7_TA-PROV(2010)0227(cor01)) to a text adopted by Parliament: Corrigendum to the position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 17 June 2010 with a view to the adoption of Directive 2010/…/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2003/71/EC on the prospectus to be published when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading and 2004/109/EC on the harmonisation of transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market (Text with EEA relevance) P7_TA-PROV(2010)0227 - (COM(2009)0491 – C7-0170/2009 – 2009/0132(COD)) ECON Pursuant to Rule 216(4) of the Rules of Procedure, this corrigendum would be deemed approved unless, not later than 48 hours after its announcement, a request was made by a political group or at least 40 Members that it be put to the vote. The corrigendum was available on the Séance en direct site. 6. Composition of committees and delegations The President had received requests from the S&D Group for the following appointments: DEVE Committee: Ricardo Cortés Lastra to replace Enrique Guerrero Salom Delegation to the EU-Mexico Joint Parliamentary Committee: Ricardo Cortés Lastra The appointments would be deemed ratified if there were no objections before the approval of these minutes. C 25 E/4 EN Official Journal of the European Union 27.1.2011 Wednesday 10 November 2010 7. Documents received The following documents had been received: 1) from the Council and Commission: — Proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of a Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Solomon Islands (09335/2010 - C7-0338/2010 - 2010/0094(NLE)) referred to responsible: PECH opinion: DEVE, BUDG — Proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of a Voluntary Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Cameroon on forest law enforcement, governance and trade in timber and derived products to the European Union (FLEGT) (12796/2010 - C7-0339/2010 - 2010/0217(NLE)) referred to responsible: INTA opinion: DEVE, ENVI — Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on roll-over protection structures mounted in front of the driver’s seat on narrow-track wheeled agricultural and forestry tractors (codification) (COM(2010)0610 - C7-0340/2010 - 2010/0302(COD)) referred to responsible: JURI In accordance with Rule 124(1), the President said he would consult the European Economic and Social Committee on this proposal. — Proposal for a Council and Commission decision on the conclusion of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Serbia, of the other part (15619/2007 - C7-0341/2010 - 2007/0255(NLE)) referred to responsible: AFET opinion: INTA — Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2000/25/EC as regards the provisions for tractors placed on the market under the flexibility scheme (COM(2010)0607 - C7-0342/2010 - 2010/0301(COD)) referred to responsible: ENVI In accordance with Rule 124(1), the President said he would consult the European Economic and Social Committee on this proposal. — Proposal for a Regulation (EU) […/….] of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002 establishing a European Maritime Safety Agency (COM(2010)0611 - C7-0343/2010 - 2010/0303(COD)) referred to responsible: TRAN opinion: ENVI, BUDG, ITRE In accordance with Rule 124(1), the President said he would consult the European Economic and Social Committee on this proposal. 27.1.2011 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 25 E/5 Wednesday 10 November 2010 — Proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2010/005ES/Comunidad Valenciana Natural Stone from Spain) (COM(2010)0617 - C7-0344/2010 - 2010/2250(BUD)) referred to responsible: BUDG opinion: EMPL — Proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2010/009ES/Comunidad Valenciana - Textiles from Spain) (COM(2010)0613 - C7-0345/2010 - 2010/2251(BUD)) referred to responsible: BUDG opinion: EMPL — Proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2010/016 ES/Aragón - Retail trade from Spain) (COM(2010)0615 - C7-0346/2010 - 2010/2252(BUD)) referred to responsible: BUDG opinion: EMPL — Proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Sunshine Supplement
    April 2010 János Áder calls on the EU to do more to tackle The sunshine vitamin D deficiency supplement Vitamin D deficiency in focus Anja Weisgerber wants to raise awareness of the importance of vitamin D Consumers need more information on the food they eat, says Jo Leinen In association with Special supplement April 2010 EDITORIAL TEAM Managing editor In association with Brian Johnson Martin Banks Martha Moss Louise Tait Kevin McCann International Press Centre Boulevard Charlemagne 1 Box 2 Brussels 1041 Tel +32 (0)2 285 0828 [email protected] www.theparliament.com VITAMIN D EDITORIAL BOARD Editor 4 Heated debate Catherine Stihler MEP János Áder is calling on the EU to make the prevention and treatment of vitamin D deficiency a top priority Editorial board Jorgo Chatzimarkakis Romana Jordan Cizelj 5 Feeling the benefit Eija-Riitta Korhola Jan Olbrycht Werner Christie says dealing with vitamin D deficiency in Europe would bring big rewards Alojz Peterle Struan Stevenson 6 All together now Inese Vaidere Politicians and doctors should work together to raise awareness of vitamin D deficiency, writes Konstanty Radziwill PRODUCTION John Levers 7 In the loop Tel +44 (0)20 7091 7524 Jo Leinen says consumers need more information to prevent vitamin D deficiency in Europe Kazimierz Kapusniak ADVERTISING AND 8 Pushing the agenda SPONSORSHIP SALES The time for talking is over, argues Jim Higgins, as he tells Kevin McCann about the need to act decisively on vitamin D Director Paul Sanders deficiency Tel +44 (0)20 7091 7658 Andrew Oliver 9 A call to action Tel +44 (0)1273 690 045 Anja Weisgerber talks to Martin Banks about the need to raise awareness about the importance of vitamin D Sandra Fernandez Monica Barbosa 10 The big issue Philip Beausire Tel +44 (0)20 7091 7661 The importance of vitamin D is set to move rapidly up the political agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament: 7Th February 2017 Redistribution of Political Balance
    POLICY PAPER European issues n°420 European Parliament: 7th February 2017 redistribution of political balance Charles de Marcilly François Frigot At the mid-term of the 8th legislature, the European Parliament, in office since the elections of May 2014, is implementing a traditional “distribution” of posts of responsibility. Article 19 of the internal regulation stipulates that the Chairs of the parliamentary committees, the Deputy-Chairs, as well as the questeurs, hold their mandates for a renewable 2 and a-half year period. Moreover, internal elections within the political groups have supported their Chairs, whilst we note that there has been some slight rebalancing in terms of the coordinators’ posts. Although Italian citizens draw specific attention with the two main candidates in the battle for the top post, we should note other appointments if we are to understand the careful balance between nationalities, political groups and individual experience of the European members of Parliament. A TUMULTUOUS PRESIDENTIAL provide collective impetus to potential hesitations on the part of the Member States. In spite of the victory of the European People’s Party (EPP) in the European elections, it supported Martin As a result the election of the new President of Schulz in July 2104 who stood for a second mandate as Parliament was a lively[1] affair: the EPP candidate – President of the Parliament. In all, with the support of the Antonio Tajani – and S&D Gianni Pittella were running Liberals (ADLE), Martin Schulz won 409 votes following neck and neck in the fourth round of the relative an agreement concluded by the “grand coalition” after majority of the votes cast[2].
    [Show full text]
  • Association of Accredited Lobbyists to the European Parliament
    ASSOCIATION OF ACCREDITED LOBBYISTS TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT OVERVIEW OF EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT FORUMS AALEP Secretariat Date: October 2007 Avenue Milcamps 19 B-1030 Brussels Tel: 32 2 735 93 39 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.lobby-network.eu TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction………………………………………………………………..3 Executive Summary……………………………………………………….4-7 1. European Energy Forum (EEF)………………………………………..8-16 2. European Internet Forum (EIF)………………………………………..17-27 3. European Parliament Ceramics Forum (EPCF………………………...28-29 4. European Parliamentary Financial Services Forum (EPFSF)…………30-36 5. European Parliament Life Sciences Circle (ELSC)……………………37 6. Forum for Automobile and Society (FAS)…………………………….38-43 7. Forum for the Future of Nuclear Energy (FFNE)……………………..44 8. Forum in the European Parliament for Construction (FOCOPE)……..45-46 9. Pharmaceutical Forum…………………………………………………48-60 10.The Kangaroo Group…………………………………………………..61-70 11.Transatlantic Policy Network (TPN)…………………………………..71-79 Conclusions………………………………………………………………..80 Index of Listed Companies………………………………………………..81-90 Index of Listed MEPs……………………………………………………..91-96 Most Active MEPs participating in Business Forums…………………….97 2 INTRODUCTION Businessmen long for certainty. They long to know what the decision-makers are thinking, so they can plan ahead. They yearn to be in the loop, to have the drop on things. It is the genius of the lobbyists and the consultants to understand this need, and to satisfy it in the most imaginative way. Business forums are vehicles for forging links and maintain a dialogue with business, industrial and trade organisations. They allow the discussions of general and pre-legislative issues in a different context from lobbying contacts about specific matters. They provide an opportunity to get Members of the European Parliament and other decision-makers from the European institutions together with various business sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • A-8-2016-0354 EN.Pdf
    European Parliament 2014-2019 Plenary sitting A8-0354/2016 28.11.2016 *** RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the United States of America and the European Union on the protection of personal information relating to the prevention, investigation, detection, and prosecution of criminal offenses (08523/2016 – C8-0329/2016 – 2016/0126(NLE)) Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Rapporteur: Jan Philipp Albrecht RR\1110883EN.docx PE592.131v03-00 EN United in diversity EN PR_NLE-AP_Agreement Symbols for procedures * Consultation procedure *** Consent procedure ***I Ordinary legislative procedure (first reading) ***II Ordinary legislative procedure (second reading) ***III Ordinary legislative procedure (third reading) (The type of procedure depends on the legal basis proposed by the draft act.) PE592.131v03-00 2/17 RR\1110883EN.docx EN CONTENTS Page DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION ................................. 5 SHORT JUSTIFICATION ......................................................................................................... 6 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS ................................................... 10 ANNEX: LETTER FROM THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS .......................... 14 PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE ................................................................... 16 FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE .................................... 17 RR\1110883EN.docx
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix to Memorandum of Law on Behalf of United
    APPENDIX TO MEMORANDUM OF LAW ON BEHALF OF UNITED KINGDOM AND EUROPEAN PARLIAMENTARIANS AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION LIST OF AMICI HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND AND MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT House of Lords The Lord Ahmed The Lord Alderdice The Lord Alton of Liverpool, CB The Rt Hon the Lord Archer of Sandwell, QC PC The Lord Avebury The Lord Berkeley, OBE The Lord Bhatia, OBE The Viscount Bledisloe, QC The Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury The Rt Hon the Baroness Boothroyd, OM PC The Lord Borrie, QC The Rt Hon the Baroness Bottomley of Nettlestone, DL PC The Lord Bowness, CBE DL The Lord Brennan, QC The Lord Bridges, GCMG The Rt Hon the Lord Brittan of Spennithorne, QC DL PC The Rt Hon the Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville, CH PC The Viscount Brookeborough, DL The Rt Hon the Lord Browne-Wilkinson, PC The Lord Campbell of Alloway, ERD QC The Lord Cameron of Dillington The Rt Hon the Lord Cameron of Lochbroom, QC The Rt Rev and Rt Hon the Lord Carey of Clifton, PC The Lord Carlile of Berriew, QC The Baroness Chapman The Lord Chidgey The Lord Clarke of Hampstead, CBE The Lord Clement-Jones, CBE The Rt Hon the Lord Clinton-Davis, PC The Lord Cobbold, DL The Lord Corbett of Castle Vale The Rt Hon the Baroness Corston, PC The Lord Dahrendorf, KBE The Lord Dholakia, OBE DL The Lord Donoughue The Baroness D’Souza, CMG The Lord Dykes The Viscount Falkland The Baroness Falkner of Margravine The Lord Faulkner of Worcester The Rt Hon the
    [Show full text]
  • En En Draft Agenda
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2009 - 2014 Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs LIBE(2011)0131_1 DRAFT AGENDA Meeting Monday 31 January 2011, 15.00 – 18.30 Tuesday 1 February 2011, 9.00 – 12.30 Brussels Room: JAN 4 Q 2 1. Adoption of agenda 2. Chair's announcements and announcements concerning coordinators' recommendations 3. Approval of minutes of meeting of: 2 June 2010 PV – PE445.931v01-00 31 January 2011, 15.00 – 15.45 In camera 4. Europol's role in the framework of the EU-US TFTP Agreement and state of play of operational and strategic agreements of Europol (specific focus: the agreement on exchange of personal data and related information that Europol has with the US) LIBE/7/05204 Presentation by Rob Wainwright (Director of Europol) OJ\854891EN.rtf PE456.880v02-00 EN United in diversity EN 31 January 2011, 15.45 – 16.15 5. Establishment of an evaluation mechanism to verify application of the Schengen acquis LIBE/7/04537 ***I 2010/0312(COD) COM(2010)0624 – C7-0370/2010 Rapporteur: Carlos Coelho (PPE) Responsible: LIBE – Opinions: BUDG – Decision: no opinion Presentation by the Commission 31 January 2011, 16.15 – 16.50 Joint debate 6. 2009 discharge: EU general budget, Section III - Commission LIBE/7/03674 2010/2142(DEC) SEC(2010)0963[01] – C7-0211/2010 Rapporteur for the Simon Busuttil (PPE) PA – PE454.527v01-00 opinion: DT – PE454.719v01-00 Responsible: CONT – Jorgo Chatzimarkakis (ALDE) PR – PE450.662v01-00 Consideration of draft opinion Deadline for tabling amendments: 3 February 2011, 12.00 7. 2009 discharge: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights LIBE/7/04037 2010/2168(DEC) SEC(2010)0963[12] – C7-0228/2010 Rapporteur for the Simon Busuttil (PPE) PA – PE454.528v01-00 opinion: Responsible: CONT – Georgios Stavrakakis (S&D) PR – PE450.717v01-00 Consideration of draft opinion Deadline for tabling amendments: 3 February 2011, 12.00 8.
    [Show full text]
  • TTIP-Letter-To-Schul
    Mr. Martin Schulz, President of the European Parliament European Parliament Bât. Paul-Henri Spaak, 09B011 60, rue Wiertz B-1047 Bruxelles 7 July 2016 Dear Mr. Schulz, In anticipation of the 14th round of negotiations between the EU and US for the Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) planned to start on 11 July in Brussels, we are writing to you on behalf of over 65 organisations representing consumers, farmers, not-for-profit health insurers, environmental and general public interest groups to express our serious concerns that the European Commission is failing to respect the European Parliament’s 2015 Resolution on TTIP. 1 Today, we released new analysis, which demonstrates that the European Commission continues to ignore critical aspects of the European Parliament’s Resolution on TTIP, in particular regarding recommendations related to protecting public health, the environment, and democracy. 1. Negotiating on and affecting EU chemicals and pesticides rules The European Parliament has called on the European Commission not to negotiate on issues “where the EU and the US have very different rules” and not to allow regulatory cooperation to affect future standards in such areas. However, the European Commission has continued to negotiate on issues that will affect legislation on chemicals, pesticides, and cosmetic products, whether directly or through regulatory cooperation. This is particularly worrying because the European Commission is already lowering current EU standards of protection (such as on limits to pesticide residues in food) in order to remove barriers to trade. 2. Respect for the EU regulatory system The European Parliament has called on the European Commission “to fully respect the established regulatory systems on both sides of the Atlantic”.
    [Show full text]
  • Bewerber Der FDP Zur Europawahl 2009 Auf Der Gemeinsamen Liste Für Alle Länder Platz Name Landesverband Ergebnis in % 1 Dr. Si
    Bewerber der FDP zur Europawahl 2009 auf der gemeinsamen Liste für alle Länder Platz Name Landesverband Ergebnis in % 1 Dr. Silvana Koch-Mehrin, MdEP Baden-Württemberg 95,29 2 Alexander Graf Lambsdorff, MdEP Nordrhein-Westfalen 96,98 3 Dr. Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, MdEP Saarland 90,20 4 Dr. Wolf Klinz, MdEP Hessen 89,20 5 Gesine Meißner, MdL Niedersachsen 72,85 6 Alexander Alvaro, MdEP Junge Liberale 90,53 7 Holger Krahmer, MdEP Sachsen 87,76 8 Michael Theurer, MdL Baden-Württemberg 88,02 9 Nadja Hirsch Bayern 91,55 10 Jürgen Creutzmann, MdL Rheinland-Pfalz 69,16 11 Alexandra Thein Berlin 74,41 12 Britta Reimers Schleswig-Holstein 71,99 13 Matthias Purdel Thüringen 81,53 14 Alexander Plahr Nordrhein-Westfalen 67,18 15 Norbert Meyer Niedersachsen 82,33 16 Franz Prockl Bayern 87,62 17 Dr. Kornelia Kimpfel Brandenburg 67,31 18 Friedrich Hülsenbeck Sachsen-Anhalt 90,22 19 Tom Eich Baden-Württemberg 67,39 20 Dr. Fridjof Matuszewski Mecklenburg-Vorpommern 74,90 21 Christian Stratmann Nordrhein-Westfalen 84,78 22 Christopher Knaf Baden-Württemberg 86,09 23 Alexander Schreiber Nordrhein-Westfalen 85,56 24 Richard Böhringer Bayern 87,93 25 Hubertus Rau Niedersachsen 86,88 26 Dirk Pfeil Hessen 86,61 27 Sven Strumann Nordrhein-Westfalen 85,30 28 Michael Weis Rheinland-Pfalz 85,30 29 Martin Müller Baden-Württemberg 86,09 30 Maximilian Conrad Nordrhein-Westfalen 85,04 31 Dr. Jens Maceiczik Bayern 87,93 32 Klaus Gerhard Trybuhl Niedersachsen 86,09 33 Dipl.-Ing. Andree Saatkamp Nordrhein-Westfalen 85,04 34 Lasse Becker Hessen 87,66 35 Annick Moiteaux Baden-Württemberg 86,61 36 Boris Böhme Berlin 85,83 37 Ulrike Schultz Nordrhein-Westfalen 85,56 38 Kirstin Funke Schleswig-Holstein 85,56 39 Horst Farr Bayern 87,14 40 Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • En En ***I Report
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2009 - 2014 Plenary sitting A7-0034/2013 7.2.2013 ***I REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on procurement by entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (COM(2011)0895 – C7-0007/2012– 2011/0439(COD)) Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection Rapporteur: Marc Tarabella RR\926628EN.doc PE483.470v03-00 EN United in diversity EN PR_COD_1amCom Symbols for procedures * Consultation procedure *** Consent procedure ***I Ordinary legislative procedure (first reading) ***II Ordinary legislative procedure (second reading) ***III Ordinary legislative procedure (third reading) (The type of procedure depends on the legal basis proposed by the draft act.) Amendments to a draft act In amendments by Parliament, amendments to draft acts are highlighted in bold italics. Highlighting in normal italics is an indication for the relevant departments showing parts of the draft act which may require correction when the final text is prepared – for instance, obvious errors or omissions in a language version. Suggested corrections of this kind are subject to the agreement of the departments concerned. The heading for any amendment to an existing act that the draft act seeks to amend includes a third line identifying the existing act and a fourth line identifying the provision in that act that Parliament wishes to amend. Passages in an existing act that Parliament wishes to amend, but that the draft act has left unchanged, are highlighted in bold. Any deletions that Parliament wishes to make in such passages are indicated thus: [...]. PE483.470v03-00 2/296 RR\926628EN.doc EN CONTENTS Page DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION................................
    [Show full text]
  • Special Report
    SPECIAL REPORT Key points for the 8th term of the European Parliament (2014-2019) Madrid, November 2014 BARCELONA BOGOTÁ BUENOS AIRES LIMA LISBOA MADRID MÉXICO PANAMÁ QUITO RIO J SÃO PAULO SANTIAGO STO DOMINGO KEY POINTS FOR THE 8TH TERM OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT (2014-2019) 1. THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 1. THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2. THE LATEST ELECTION The European Parliament has, since its creation in 1962 in the 3. MAIN ISSUES IN THE context of the evolution of European integration, become the LEGISLATIVE AGENDA European Union (EU) Institution to have gained more power and 4. SPANISH DELEGATION relevance in the decision-making process of the Union. Indeed, over the years, it has gained increasingly important powers, legitimized 5. CONCLUSIONS and differentiated by the fact that it is the only EU Institution to be 6. APPENDIX 1: COMPETENCES elected by universal suffrage. 7. APPENDIX 2: CURRENT COMPOSITION OF THE It has evolved from being a mere advisory body to having the COMMITTEES power to co-legislate, together with the Council, in more than 85 legislative areas, exercising legislative powers as well as powers 8. APPENDIX 3: THE CURRENT of budgetary and political control. It also wields a considerable BUREAU OF THE EUROPEAN amount of political influence, and its competences include those PARLIAMENT of electing the President of the European Commission, vetoing the 9. APPENDIX 4: EUROPEAN appointment of the College, and even forcing the resignation of the PARLIAMENT DELEGATIONS entire Commission after a motion of no confidence. AUTHORS The official headquarters of the Parliament are in Strasbourg, where the main plenary sessions are held.
    [Show full text]
  • Brochure Template
    Through a glass darkly 1 Briefing note June 2014 The new European Parliament: what to expect From 22 to 25 May 2014, Europeans went to the polls. Many of them went to express their dissatisfaction. Although the majority of the incoming 751 MEPs remain broadly supportive of the EU, both they and those who need to engage with the European Parliament will have to adapt to the increased power of a disparate anti-EU and anti- establishment minority over the next five years. This briefing provides an overview of the election results* at the EU level and what happens next, further analysis on results in France, Germany, Greece and the UK, a look at the key outgoing and incoming MEPs, and an examination of the selection procedures for the new leaders of the European Commission, European Parliament and European Council. The election results The election saw a marked rise, of about 10%, in the number of MEPs elected from anti-EU and anti-establishment parties from both ends of the political spectrum. They won around 230, or 31%, of the 751 seats, compared to 164, or 21%, of the 766 seats in 2009. What remains to be seen is whether the newly -elected MEPs will join existing, or form new, political groups in the Parliament (see below for more information on the importance of political groups and how they are formed). Despite their decreased numbers, the pro-Europeans remain the dominant force in the European Parliament. Their four groups – the centre-right, the centre-left, the liberals and the greens – won 521, or 69%, of the 751 available seats.
    [Show full text]
  • Ms Viviane Reding Vice-President of the European Commission Commissioner for Justice, Fundamental Rights and Citizenship B-10409 Brussels Belgium
    Ms Viviane Reding Vice-President of the European Commission Commissioner for Justice, Fundamental Rights and Citizenship B-10409 Brussels Belgium 10 September 2013 Dear Vice-President Reding Pre-trial detention in the EU As the European Commission, Council and Parliament have recognised, ‘excessively long periods of pre-trial detention are detrimental to the individual, can prejudice cooperation between the Member States, and do not represent the values for which the European Union stands’.1 We are writing to you now to follow-up on the European Union’s work to tackle this problem and to urge the Commission to continue its work in this area beyond the current legislative programme, including developing a timeframe for tabling a legislative proposal setting common minimum standards for the use of pre-trial detention in the EU. We understand that the European Commission is at this stage intending to focus on monitoring the implementation of three Framework Decisions: the European Supervision Order (ESO); the Prisoner Transfer Framework Decision; and the Framework Decision on the application of mutual recognition to judgments and probation decisions and is not currently proposing legislation. We take note of this emphasis on effective implementation but would highlight that only one of the three Framework Decisions, the ESO, has the potential to impact on pre-trial detention. While it may go some way to alleviating problems faced by non-nationals by enabling them to return home while awaiting trial, even this is very limited in scope. In addition, the three Framework Decisions are all pre-Lisbon measures and the European Commission therefore currently has no enforcement powers if problems with their implementation are identified.
    [Show full text]